Well-Oiled Friendship Or Political Pipe Dream?

WELL-OILED FRIENDSHIP OR POLITICAL PIPE DREAM?
Ruben Zarbabyan, RT

Russia Today
86
Nov 14 2008

A meeting to discuss the diversification of Europe’s energy supply
in under way in Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan. Members of the GUAM
Organisation for Democracy and Economic Development are in talks with
several Baltic and Black sea countries as well as with global energy
players. RT looks at the summit’s visitors and its agenda.

With Turkey, Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Romania,
Bulgaria, the U.S., Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Georgia, and the EU
being represented in Baku, it is easier to point out those who won’t
be at the Baku Energy Security Summit: Russia.

This hardly comes as a surprise, as all the issues on the agenda are
more or less related to reducing the reliance on Russia as an energy
supplier, whose role is being reduced every year, according to experts.

Combating the reliance on Russia since 1918

While some GUAM members are building the pipe, others are running away.

Picture by Vladimir Kremlev Russia’s monopoly on energy supplies to
Europe has long been a concern for the latter, and seeking to diversify
its sources of hydrocarbons, Europeans have set their sights on the
Caspian countries.

It is known that the late British Empire made a desperate attempt to
gain control over the region by invading Baku during the Civil War in
the Soviet Union as early as 1918, and since then Caspian oil hasn’t
become less popular.

With proven oil reserves in the Caspian Basin (belonging to Azerbaijan,
Russia, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan) comparable in size to the North
Sea’s, it is the sole source of oil available in the region apart
from Russia.

The biggest obstacle preventing the delivery of Caspian oil to
European consumers is transportation. Since the 1960s Russia has had
major pipelines connecting it with Europe through Ukraine, while the
first non-Russian pipeline transferring oil from the Caspian Basin –
the 1,768-kilometre-long Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan – started operating in
May 2005.

Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan started operating in 2005 Of course passing through
countries with many frozen conflicts, it’s hardly the most reliable
route in the world. A major blast in Turkey’s Erzincan Province,
attributed to the Kurdistan Workers Party, disrupted its for 19 days
in August 2008.

And even while intact, the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan supplies only 1 per
cent of global demand, so the energy supply to Europe still remains
a major work area for some former Soviet countries.

Eleven-yeal-old organisation becomes useful at last

Energy issues gave purpose to the GUAM Organization for Democracy and
Economic Development, an organization formed in 1997 by four former
Soviet republics – Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova.

It was created with a broad list of functions to combat Russian
influence in the region, but remained largely unused, before the
Orange Revolution in Ukraine and Mikhail Saakshvili’s coming to power
in Georgia.

After that GUAM intensified its cooperation within eight working
groups: power engineering, transport, trade and economics, information
and telecommunications, culture, science and education, tourism,
fighting terrorism, organized crime and dissemination of drugs.

However, energy has been, is and will remain the main area of
cooperation and the driving force of the organisation. GUAM members
became the key participants of the pro-Western energy summits held in
Krakow in May 2007, in Vilnius in October 2007 and in Kiev in May 2008.

Two-day Baku Energy Summit is the fourth.

Key transportation corridor to be discussed

Euro-Asian Oil Transportation Corridor The main agenda of the summit
includes:

– re-exportation of Turkmen and Kazakh oil and gas resources to
Europe, bypassing Russia through Azerbaijan; – sustainability of energy
sources and routes; – safety and protection of hydrocarbon pipelines;
– acceleration of energy projects.

A big topic at the summit will be the Euro-Asian Oil Transportation
Corridor, which is basically an enlarged version of the project to
extend the Odessa-Brody oil pipeline from Ukraine to Poland.

Completed in 2001 up to Brody near the Polish border, that pipeline
remained empty for three years as Russia chose to sell its own oil,
instead of transferring Kazakh oil to Odessa. In 2004, Russian oil
companies began to transfer oil from Brody to Odessa.

However, Ukraine still looks to extend this pipeline so that it can
carry Azerbaijani oil arriving from the Georgian port of Supsa to
Odessa and then take it to the Polish refinery at Plock and potentially
to the port of Gdansk.

The proposed Nabucco pipeline Some 500 kilometres of pipeline have
to be built for that to happen.

The Nabucco pipeline will be discussed as well.

Members come, members go

Of course geopolitical issues are never far away from energy.

Internal problems that exist in each of the GUAM countries remain
obstacles to an efficient integration process.

Ukraine’s Crimea has a Russian population of 70 per cent, and faces
additional problems with Crimean Tatars who seek the establishment
of a national autonomy.

Azerbaijan is still short of solutions on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue,
and doesn’t have control over several areas near it.

In Moldova, the situation of the breakaway Transdniester region remains
unresolved – 16 years after it started. Russian peacekeeping forces
have been stationed there.

Any shift in the world’s geopolitical balance (like the recognition of
Kosovo, Abkhazia and South Ossetia) is destined to have a big impact
on GUAM. Its failure to accomplish anything significant has already
lost it some members. But it continues to gain new ones.

In 1999, the organisation was renamed GUUAM due to the membership of
Uzbekistan, who signed its charter in 2001 only to withdraw in 2005,
after the country’s President, Islam Karimov, failed to attend the
summit in Chisinau, Moldova.

A similar situation is now on the cards with Moldova’s president,
Vladimir Voronin, who failed to show up at GUAM summits for two years
in a row and is absent at Baku too.

Meanwhile, GUAM also looks for new members, after giving Turkey and
Latvia a permanent observer status in 2005. After Kazakhstan and
Turkmenistan reacted on the idea of joining GUAM without enthusiasm,
the organisation turned their sight on countries in Eastern Europe.

That’s why Bulgaria’s President, Angel Marin, Lithuania’s Valdas
Adamkus, Poland’s Lech Kaczynski, Romania’s Traian Basescu,
Latvia’s Valdis Zatlers, Turkey’s Abdullah Gul, as well as Estonia’s
Prime-Minister, Andrus Ansip, Hungaria’s Ferenc Gyurcsany, Greece
Development Minister, Christos Folias and top energy officials from
Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan are all at the energy summit discussing
their roles in the development of alternative energy routes.

U.S. Energy Minister Samuel Bodman is there too to encourage them,
while his EU counterpartj, Andris Piebalgs, who left Baku just days
ago, is back again to stress the importance of the Nabucco pipeline
project.

http://www.russiatoday.com/features/news/332

President Of Cyprus To Visit Armenia In 2009

PRESIDENT OF CYPRUS TO VISIT ARMENIA IN 2009

ARKA
Nov 14, 2008

YEREVAN, November 14. /ARKA/. President of Cyprus Demetris Christofias
is to pay an official visit to Armenia in 2009, Speaker of Cypriot
House of Commons Marios Garoyan at a press conference held jointly
with the Speaker of Armenian Parliament Hovik Abrahamyan Thursday.

Issue on mutual opening of embassies is to be discussed during
the visit.

Both countries, their governments and foreign ministries are concerned
over the issue and the final decision may be made during the visit,
Garoyan said.

Swiss President: Armenian Genocide Should Be Studied By Historians,

SWISS PRESIDENT: ARMENIAN GENOCIDE SHOULD BE STUDIED BY HISTORIANS, BUT ITS DENIAL SHOULD BE PUNISHED

PanARMENIAN.Net
12.11.2008 14:47 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The President of the Swiss Confederation has backed
Turkey’s calls for a study of the Armenian Genocide, saying the
dispute over history should be settled by historians, not politicians.

Pascal Couchepin is on a visit to Turkey on occasion of the 80th
anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between
Switzerland and Turkey. He had talks with President Abdullah Gul on
Monday and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Parliament Speaker
Koksal Toptan on Tuesday.

To Turkey’s dismay, the Swiss leader defended his country’s laws
penalizing denial of the Armenian Genocide during a news conference
with Gul. He said the laws were passed 20 years ago with the principal
purpose of punishing denial of the Holocaust and that the Swiss
judges had the flexibility to interpret laws according to different
circumstances, Today’s Zaman reports.

The lower house of the Swiss Parliament recognized the Armenian
Genocide in a 2003 vote, causing strain in bilateral relations
with Turkey.

Last year, Dogu Perincek, a Turkish politician and the leader of the
Workers’ Party (IP), was charged of denial of the Armenian Genocide.

Armenia-EU Relations Discussed At The President’s Office

ARMENIA-EU RELATIONS DISCUSSED AT THE PRESIDENT’S OFFICE

armradio.am
13.11.2008 15:15

The whole framework of Armenia-EU relations was discussed during RA
President Serzh Sargsyan’s working consultations, featuring members
of the National Security Council of the Republic of Armenia, members
of Government, heads of a number of interested agencies.

The President of the republic presented the details of his visit
to Brussels and posed certain issues connected with the further
development of cooperation with the European Union.

Serzh Sargsyan noted that the agenda of the visit to Brussels was
very rich: during three days he had more than twenty meetings with
the leadership of the European Union and gave interviews to leading
European media.

The primary impression from the talks was that the European structures
and their representatives are obviously satisfied with the level of
relations with Armenia and secondly, there is willingness to continue
deepening the relations and implement more daring programs.

The President said that during the meetings reference was made to
common political issues, Armenian-Turkish relations, settlement of
the Karabakh conflict. However, the main topic of discussion was the
Armenia-EU Action Plan.

Stressing the wish of our county to come closer to Europe, Serzh
Sargsyan said that "as a first step the Armenian side proposes that
the contacts between our citizens are made easier by freeing up visa
rules to bring about the best conditions for trade and commerce.

According to the President, an agreement was reached on creating a
sub-commission with the EU Commission on Justice, Freedom and Security
and it will be established in the near future.

Noting that both parties are willing to deepen the relations, the
President said: "We should view these works not as a commitment,
but as an activity that will provide an opportunity to continue the
reforms in our country."

In the President’s opinion, the new Action Plan will, most probably,be
signed within the framework of the European Eastern Policy and will
have two peculiarities: first, the component of regional cooperation
will be more obvious and second, different volume and depth of
cooperation will be set for participants of the neighborhood policy
depending on how much the country is ready for it.

The President demanded to take the formation of the new program most
seriously and instructed the Ministers and the heads of corresponding
agencies to establish personal control over the works related to
their spheres.

During the consultations Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian presented
the process of implementation of the Action Plan, the works done in
different directions in 2008, noting that those are the continuation of
the actions launched in 2007. The Minister said Armenia will submit a
report on the work done in 2008 during the20sitting of the EU Council
of Ministers on December 9, 2008.

Secretary of the National Security Council Arthur Baghdasaryan referred
to the activity of the interdepartmental commission on cooperation
with European structures and noted that a new ambitious package
of actions has been formed on the basis of suggestions of all the
interested Ministries and agencies, which can serve as a good basis
for further discussions and cooperation.

Sargsyan, Gul Likely To Meet Before October 2009

SARGSYAN, GUL LIKELY TO MEET BEFORE OCTOBER 2009

PanARMENIAN.Net
11.11.2008 17:05 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ During talks with European Commission President
Jose Manuel Barroso, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan discussed a
possibility of another meeting with Turkish leader Abdullah Gul, the RA
President’s spokesman Samvel Farmanyan told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter.

As to meeting with Aliyev, he said, "The Armenian President met lately
with his Azerbaijani counterpart and a new meeting makes no sense now."

In an interview with Euronews, President Sargsyan said he doesn’t rule
out that the meeting with Mr Gul can take place before October 2009,
when a game between Armenian and Turkish soccer teams is scheduled.

Meanwhile, the Azeri Press Agency quoted Turkey’s Ambassador to
Azerbaijan Hulusi Kilic today as saying that "a trilateral meeting
between Presidents of Azerbaijan, Turkey and Armenia is expected till
the yearend in Turkey."

Turkish Foreign Ministry said Turkey doesn’t plan trilateral talks
between leaders of Armenia, Turkey and Azerbaijan.

"Of course, we would be pleased by visits of the Presidents of
Azerbaijan and Armenia. But Turkey doesn’t plan a meeting of the kind,"
said Burak Ozugergin, spokesman for the Turkish MFA, the Anatolia
news agency reports.

Earlier, some Turkish media circulated reports that "Turkish President
Abdullah Gul is readying to take another bold step to contribute to
regional peace in the Caucasus by soon hosting a trilateral summit
with the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan."

S. Sargsyan Says Karabakh Conflict Regulation Possible If Azerbaijan

S. SARGSIAN SAYS KARABAKH CONFLICT REGULATION POSSIBLE IF AZERBAIJAN RECOGNIZES THE RIGHT OF KARABAKH PEOPLE TO SELF DETERMINATION

ARMENPRESS
Nov 11, 2008

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 11, ARMENPRESS: "For a long time we are saying that
Karabakh conflict regulation is possible if Azerbaijan recognizes the
right of Nagorno Karabakh people to self determination, if there is
a land border between Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh and if there are
international guarantees ensuring the security of Nagorno Karabakh",
Armenian President Serzh Sargsian said in an interview to French Le
Monde daily, speaking on prospects of Karabakh conflict regulation.

Referring to the question of the French correspondent on "de facto"
common border between Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh, the Armenian
president noted that "it must have the same status as Nagorno
Karabakh".

What The Opposition Concludes

WHAT THE OPPOSITION CONCLUDES

Lragir.am
14:58:51 – 10/11/2008

Endorsing the pause in rallies which Levon Ter-Petrosyan has declared,
the leader of the Social Democratic Hnchak Party Lyudmila Sargsyan
stated November 10 at the Iravunk de facto press club that thereby
Levon Ter-Petrosyan showed that the state is more important than
the change of government. Lyudmila Sargsyan noted earlier that the
current government led by Serge Sargsyan has put out Karabakh and the
liberated territories to sale. In that case, why did the opposition
stop instead of struggling against that, the reporters asked?

According to Gurgen Yeghiazaryan, a member of the Social Democratic
Hnchak Party, the pause of the opposition intends to enable the
government to take its time to think and act. "But we see that they do
not take their time to think and act," Gurgen Yeghiazaryan said. The
reporters asked what conclusions the opposition draws from the failure
of the government to use the chance that the opposition gives. "If
the opposition draws conclusions, of course," the reporters added.

Gurgen Yeghiazaryan said the opposition definitely draws conclusions
and is attentively following the current process to see what
developments will take place. Gurgen Yeghiazaryan assured that the
opposition will not keep neutral and watch how Karabakh is being
sold out. By the way, Gurgen Yeghiazaryan said little time is left
till the end of the process, evidence to which is Serge Sargsyan’s
statement during his visit to Brussels. Yeghiazaryan also says that
Serge Sargsyan looked bad in Brussels.

Yeghiazaryan also stated that the Europeans want to get our lands
as soon as possible, and they intend to do that through the current
government, for which reason they have tolerated the illegitimate
government of Armenia in the recent years.

Ex-Foreign Minister Comments And Underlines

EX-FOREIGN MINISTER COMMENTS AND UNDERLINES

Lragir.am
16:24:34 – 10/11/2008

In an interview with Radio Liberty the ex-foreign minister of Armenia,
the founder of the Civilitas Foundation Vardan Oskanyan said the
positive thing about the three-party declaration signed in Moscow is
that the necessity for settling the Karabakh conflict through talks
is underscored. At the same time, Vardan Oskanyan said it would be
desirable if a point on non-use of force in the settlement of the
conflict were included in the document.

"I think that was the initial purpose of the Armenian side. Perhaps
it failed," Vardan Oskanyan said.

According to him, the most vulnerable point of the document for the
Armenian side is that the settlement of the conflict should be based
on the international law and the documents and decisions passed in
the framework of it. Vardan Oskanyan says it would be desirable if
there were not for the second part of that pronouncement because
Azerbaijan will refer to the principle of territorial integrity and
the four resolutions of the UN Security Council and the resolution
of the UN General Assembly.

With regard to Serge Sargsyan’s foreign policy, Vardan Oskanyan
said the expression of his opinion is not a harsh criticism. "I am
not opposition, I do not have a political party, I am not in the
political sphere of Armenia yet. But I have a foundation and I am
a citizen of the Republic of Armenia, and I want to be part of the
civil society which will demand real reforms from the government,"
Vardan Oskanyan said.

Commenting on the rumors about the possible return of Robert Kocharyan
to politics, according to which Vardan Oskanyan intends to set up a
political party for that purpose, the ex-foreign minister said he met
with Robert Kocharyan, ex-speaker Tigran Torosyan, ex-defense minister
of NKR Samvel Babayan but they are not negotiating the creation of
a political party.

BAKU: US Department Of Sate Welcomes Moscow Meeting Of Presidents Of

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE WELCOMES MOSCOW MEETING OF PRESIDENTS OF AZERBAIJAN AND ARMENIA

State Telegraph Agency of the Republic of Azerbaijan
November 4, 2008 Tuesday

US Department of State spokesman Mark Toner said that official
Washington welcomes the Moscow meeting of the Presidents of Azerbaijan
and Armenia.

He noted the United States hopes for continuation of negotiations
on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement within the framework
of Basic Principles. We are pleased with the parties` obligation
to continue the talks. In September, the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs
met in New-York on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, while
this weekend in Moscow. We are hopeful for continuation of talks
for peaceful settlement of the conflict within framework of Basic
Principles, he emphasized.

NKR Foreign Minister Georgy Petrossyan’s Commentary On The Moscow

NKR FOREIGN MINISTER GEORGY PETROSSYAN’S COMMENTARY ON THE MOSCOW DECLARATION

Ministry of Foreign Affairs
2008-11-07 08:29
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic

Adoption of the declaration by Presidents of Russia, Armenia and
Azerbaijan testifies readiness of the Russian Federation to act as
an effective mediator in the Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement.

The meeting may be regarded as an attempt to clarify the stance of
Azerbaijan and Armenia concerning the prospects of Nagorno Karabakh
conflict settlement via political methods, taking into consideration
the changed situation in the region after the known developments in
August, 2008 as well.

The settlement process of past years has demonstrated that the
participation of the most concerned part, the Nagorno Karabakh
Republic, a state that was established in full correspondence with
the international law, will make the negotiations more effective.

If Azerbaijan is really interested in the conflict settlement, then
it should have sat down to talks long ago, instead of trying to exert
pressure upon the Nagorno Karabakh Republic via different international
instances and countries, and misleading the international community.

Anyway, the NKR’s freedom, independent status and the people’s
security conditioned by it are the absolutely interdependent bases
of the NKR policy.