NKR: PROGRESS IN SETTLEMENT

PROGRESS IN SETTLEMENT
Azat Artsakh – Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
22 July 05
The visit of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs to the region is over.
Summing up the results with the journalists in Yerevan, in the
evening of July 15 they flew back to their countries, regretting that
they could not accept the offer of the president of Armenia Robert
Kocharian to have a holiday near Lake Sevan, only the Russian
co-chair could not refuse the tempting offer. As to the official part
of the visit, the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs Youri Merzlyakov
(Russia), Stephen Mann (US) and Bernard Fassier (France) met with the
president of Armenia Robert Kocharian. The personal representative of
the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Andrzej Kasprzyk participated in the
meeting as well. They discussed issues concerning the present stage
of the settlement of the Karabakh conflict. The co-chairs informed
the RA President about the consultations in Baku and Stepanakert. The
OSCE co-chairs also met with the foreign minister of Armenia Vartan
Oskanian. After the official meeting the co-chairmen gave a press
conference. During the press conference in Yerevan they stated that
their visit aimed to clarify the pivotal elements in the settlement
of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. During the press conferences in
Baku, Stepanakert and finally in Yerevan they stated that there is
progress in negotiations, however, according to the Russian co-chair,
they need to clarify the formulations, which they did during their
meetings in the region. Reluctant to give any details about the
negotiations, the mediators only mentioned that there is progress in
the talks which was favoured by the willingness of both parties to
compromise. What does this suppose: holding a referendum in Karabakh,
returning territories or anything else? The negotiations being
confidential, the mediators did not tell anything. Moreover, they
asked the journalists not to ask similar questions. While the
co-chairs keep silent in order not to harm the talks, the Azerbaijani
mass media announce to the world that at present the issue of
returning territories is discussed. According to the Azerbaijani
, the question of returning five of the regions controlled
by Nagorno Karabakh Republic has been decided; it is no more a
subject of the talks mediated by the OSCE Minsk Group. According to
the same source, when the OSCE Minsk Group Russian co-chair Youri
Merzlyakov said, “in the talks for the settlement of the Karabakh
conflict a perfect agreement has been reached only on one element”,
he meant the issue of returning those five regions agreed to by the
parties. In the May 12 statement of the Azerbaijani State Agency the
anonymous source said that Armenia agreed to pull out its military
forces from the adjacent regions of NKR. The plan of gradual
withdrawal of the Armenian troops from the 7 regions of the occupied
zone was discussed during the meeting of the foreign ministers of
Armenia and Azerbaijan with the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs in London.
The Azerbaijani side extended the suggestion of changes into the
programme to the co-chairs who discussed it with Vartan Oskanian.
Then the summation, to which Armenia agreed, was extended to Baku.
The plan based on the formula 5+1+1 supposes the withdrawal of troops
from five regions first: Kubatlu, Zangelan, Fizuli, Jabrail and
Aghdam. After this the parties will sign a peace agreement. Then the
Armenian forces will be withdrawn first from Kelbajar, then from
Lachin. The same source mentions that the Azerbaijani side insisted
on the introduction of the following point in the document. “If after
signing the agreement the withdrawal of the troops does not take
place in the scheduled time, the signed document will automatically
lose its effect.” It does not matter whether anyone believes the
Azerbaijanis’ ravings or not. And there is no need to repeat once
again that before conceding any territory the Armenian party will
first settle the issue of the status of Nagorno Karabakh, let alone
the return of Armenian Getashen, Shahumian and other territories
occupied by Azerbaijan.
CHRISTINE MNATSAKANIAN.
22-07-2005

www.day.az

ANCA: House Bill Seeks to Block US Aid for Railroad Project Excludin

Armenian National Committee of America
888 17th St., NW, Suite 904
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: (202) 775-1918
Fax: (202) 775-5648
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet:
PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 21, 2005
Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
Tel: (202) 775-1918
ANCA WELCOMES LEGISLATION BLOCKING U.S. AID FOR
CAUCASUS RAILROAD PROJECTS THAT EXCLUDES ARMENIA
— Measure Would Protect U.S. Taxpayers from having
to Subsidize High-Cost Route Circumventing Armenia
WASHINGTON, DC – The Armenian National Committee of America
(ANCA) welcomes the introduction of legislation in the House of
Representatives prohibiting U.S. assistance for the building of
railroads traversing the Caucasus that circumvent Armenia. The measure,
entitled the “South Caucasus Integration and Open Railroads Act of
2005,” is being introduced by Congressman Joe Knollenberg (R-MI),
Frank Pallone (D-NJ), and George Radanovich (R- CA).
“We welcome this effort to protect U.S. taxpayers from subsidizing an
ill-advised and over-priced railroad project that – at the insistence
of Turkey and Azerbaijan – has been designed to exclude Armenia,” said
Aram Hamparian, Executive Director of the ANCA. “Constructing this
railroad around Armenia runs directly counter to U.S. foreign policy
and – as if that wasn’t bad enough – makes absolutely no financial
sense – which is precisely why its sponsors will surely turn to the
American taxpayer to foot the bill.”
The text of the legislation notes “the exclusion of Armenia from
regional economic and commercial undertakings in the South Caucasus
undermines the United States policy goal of promoting a stable and
cooperative environment in the region.” In its operative section,
the legislation prohibits U.S. assistance “to develop or promote any
rail connections or railway-related connections that do not traverse
or connect with Armenia, but do traverse or connect Baku, Azerbaijan;
Tbilisi, Georgia; and Kars, Turkey. Specific forms of U.S. assistance
prohibited would include: foreign economic and development aid,
Overseas Private Investment Corporation, Trade and Development Agency,
and the Export-Import Bank.
The ANCA raised this issue publicly as early as June 10th of this
year when Communications Director Elizabeth S. Chouldjian posed a
question to the Foreign Minister of Armenia, Vardan Oskanian, during
his briefing at a National Press Club. Minister Oskanian expressed
the Armenian government’s “concern about this recent consideration by
Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey to build a new railroad from Kars to
Tbilisi, linking to an existing Azerbaijani line. They are planning
on spending something from $600 million to $1 billion to put that
railroad in place. The problem is that there is such a railroad in
the region. There is an existing Kars, Gumri, which is an Armenian
city, Tbilisi, and next to Azerbaijan. The railroad is sitting there,
rusting now for fifteen years, because Turkey, for political reasons,
does not allow the trains to cross the Turkish Armenian border. Now,
having that in place and thinking of building a new one and spending
$600 million is nonsense.” He closed his comments, by stressing that,
“It is in no one’s interest – not the U.S. or European Union or the
countries involved. I have raised this issue with the Administration
and they understand, they promised to follow this, and to try to talk
them out of engaging in this type of senseless, useless activity.”
In May of this year, the president of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliev, Georgian
President Mikheil Saakashvili, and Turkey’s President Akhmed Nedget
Sezer announced their intention to construct the railway corridor
linking Turkey, Tbilisi, and Baku. The project would effectively
replace the Kars-Gyumri railroad route, which has been blockaded
by Turkey for more than a decade. The governmental and commercial
interests involved in the project, estimated at between $600 million
and $1 billion, will almost certainly turn to the U.S. government for
financial support, subsidies, favorable lending terms, and low-cost
risk insurance, as they did for the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline route.
#####

www.anca.org

WB Yerevan Office’s head is ready to discuss issues related toelectr

ARKA News Agency
July 19 2005
WORLD BANK YEREVAN OFFICE’S HEAD ROGER ROBINSON IS READY TO DISCUSS
ISSUES RELATED TO ASSISTANCE TO PROGRAM OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT IN
ARMENIA WITH WB AUTHORITIES
YEREVAN, July 19. /ARKA/. World Bank Yerevan Office’s Head Roger
Robinson is ready to discuss the issues related to assistance to the
program of electronic government in Armenia with the WB authorities,
Armenian Government’s Press Service reports quoting Robinson as
saying Tuesday at his meeting with Armenian Prime Minister Andranik
Margaryan. Noting that this idea is acceptable to the WB and this
program could be successfully implemented in other countries, Robinson
expressed hope that the WB administration would give its consent for
the program implementation.
The sides discussed further programs of Armenia’s cooperation with the
WB, their coordination by the RA Government, as well as the necessity
of including programs being implemented and expected to be launched
in one comprehensive program.
In this context, the RA Premier expressed a hope that the
implementation of the idea of E-Government will greatly contribute to
the resolution of the problem of coordination and create favorable
conditions for the private sector. Margaryan pointed out that the
Prime Minister’s Advisor for Information technologies and Cooperation
with International Organizations will be in charge of coordinating
the WB’s programs in Armenia. He stressed that the RA Government
attaches importance to the right assessment of potential and terms
of efficient implementation of programs. P.T. -0–

British Amb. & staff thank Armenians for their support followingLond

BRITISH AMBASSADOR AND STAFF THANK ARMENIANS FOR THEIR SUPPORT FOLLOWING LONDON BOMBINGS
ArmenPress
July 18 2005
YEREVAN, JULY 18, ARMENPRESS: The British Ambassador in Armenia,
Thorda Abbott-Watt and the embassy staff thanked today in a message
all those who have sent messages of sympathy and support following the
bombings in London on 7 July. “They have valued deeply the kindness
of their friends in Armenia,” the message said.
In response to the letter which President Kocharian sent to British
Prime Minister Tony Blair on the day of the bombings, the Ambassador
on Friday sent the President the following letter: “Your Excellency
I should like to thank you sincerely for your warm and timely message
of sympathy to the Prime Minister following the bombing in London on
7 July. This is a sad time for all of us.
Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families. But
we deeply appreciate the fact that our friends share our sense of
loss and outrage at this cowardly attack. We have been moved by the
sympathy and kindness of Armenians of all walks of life, including
those who left flowers and candles anonymously in front of the Embassy
last week. Your support means a great deal to us in these troubled
times. Thank you again.’

Coordinated Element Of Karabakh Problem Concerns Return Of 5District

COORDINATED ELEMENT OF KARABAKH PROBLEM CONCERNS RETURN OF 5 DISTRICTS: BAKU MEDIA
YEREVAN, JULY 15. ARMINFO. The issue for returning to Azerbaijan 5
districts of the territories controlled by Nagorno Karabakh Republic
has been agreed on and will no longer be discussed by OSCE Minsk Group,
Day.az reports APA as learning from diplomatic sources.
When Russian OSCE MG co-chair Yuri Merzlyakov said that “only one
element of the peace talks has been agreed on” he meant the above
issue. In APA May 12 report the source says that Armenia has agreed
to withdraw its troops stage by stage from the areas around NKR.
The source says that “the plan of phased withdrawal of Armenian troops
from 7 territories of the occupation zone” was discussed during the
London meeting of the Azeri and Armenian FMs with OSCE MG. The plan
“5+1+1” envisages Armenian troops withdrawal first from Gubadli,
Zangilan, Fizuli, Jebrail and Agdam, then peace agreement conclusion
and then withdrawal from Kalbajar and later Lachin.
The source says that Azerbaijan insists that “unless after the
conclusion of the agreement the troops are withdrawn from the
territories according to the schedule the document will automatically
lose force.”

Armenian paper critical of government’s stance in talks with OSCEmed

Armenian paper critical of government’s stance in talks with OSCE mediators
Ayots Ashkar, Yerevan
15 Jul 05
Text of Sarkis Gevorkyan’s report by Armenian newspaper Ayots Ashkar
on 15 July headlined “Who and how meets the co-chairmen”
The “preliminary submission” of new proposals on the settlement of
the Karabakh issue to the communities of Azerbaijan, Armenia and
Nagornyy Karabakh on the eve of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen’s
visit to the region proves the fact that the so-called Key West-2
[reference to talks between the Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents in
Florida’s Key West in 2001] programme will have much more complicated
and far-reaching goals.
Let us try to understand what is its preliminary impact on the
political and public sphere in Armenia, Azerbaijan and Nagornyy
Karabakh.
Azerbaijan. Our enemy has made good preparations to make the US
programme on the settlement of the Karabakh issue serve its own
purposes. The following fact proves this that instead of meeting
[Azerbaijani President] Ilham Aliyev and [Azerbaijani Foreign Minister]
Elmar Mammadyarov, the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen for about two
hours held a meeting with representatives of the so-called “executive
authorities of Shushi [Susa] and Lachin [Lacin]”.
The negotiations conducted in Baku however showed that the
demonstration of Azerbaijan’s “constructive stance” did not have that
big effect on the mediators. Moreover, programmes of this type, which
are aimed at “demographic aggression”, cannot but have a response
in Armenia.
Thus, the negotiations in Baku showed that the leadership of Azerbaijan
was trying to benefit on the new US programme. The tense election
atmosphere in that country however hindered the use of cunning steps of
this kind. The situation is different in Armenia or Nagornyy Karabakh.
For this reason, when the co-chairmen arrived in Yerevan and
immediately left for Stepanakert [Xankandi], Baku’s “constructive
stance” was replaced with an official statement about preserving
Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity and a hue and cry of the Azerbaijani
opposition that simply rules out the “delayed referendum”.
Armenia. Neither the authorities nor the opposition tried to present
any “constructive counter evidence” at meetings with the co-chairmen.
The reason for this is that in fact the public equates the incumbent
authorities with Karabakh and the Karabakh issue. That is why, only
few people believe that at some stage the authorities may take moves
against Karabakh’s vital interests.
Karabakh. Incidentally, today Stepanakert takes responsibility for
settling the problem of the liberated territories [seven Azerbaijani
districts around Karabakh occupied by Armenia] and refugees, making the
mediators realise that the levers of this problem are in its hands. At
the same time, Nagornyy Karabakh compares the problem of the possible
return of Azerbaijani refugees with the problem of the restoration
of the rights of 500,000 Armenians expelled from Azerbaijan.
Thus, the following situation occurred before the co-chairmen’s Yerevan
talks: in Baku they were simply deceived, first demonstrating unlimited
constructive stance and then denying everything. In Karabakh, it was
explained to the co-chairmen that everything they were negotiating
about was, in fact, under Karabakh’s control and therefore they have
to deal with Stepanakert.
In this case, how should the co-chairmen be met here in Yerevan? We
think Yerevan should draw attention of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen
to the following:
a) to demand that talks must be conducted with representatives of the
executive authorities of Shaumyan and Getashen districts of Karabakh
[Azerbaijan’s Goranboy District and Caykand village respectively]
as only logical counter-balance to the fact that they had a meeting
with representatives of the “Shushi and Lachin executive authorities”;
b) to stress that it is absolutely unacceptable for Yerevan to mention
the point about the opening of the border with Armenia by Turkey in
any agreement on the Karabakh settlement as Turkey may use it as a
serious lever to exert pressure on Armenia in the Karabakh issue;
c) to explain to the co-chairmen that it is impossible for the
Karabakh authorities to separately resolve the problem of the liberated
territories and refugees’ return.
After presenting these three principled problems, Armenia could freely
demonstrate its readiness to accept suggestions of the co-chairmen
and put entire responsibility for the future of the said US programme
on the conflict settlement on the Azerbaijani side.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ASBAREZ Online [07-15-2005]

ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
07/15/2005
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP:// 1) Mediators Look Forward to Next Armenian-Azeri Summit 2) Reps. Matsui, Strickland Join Congressional Armenian Caucus 3) Intellectuals Concerned with Fate of Armenian Monuments in Turkey 4) Author Uncovers Armenian Genocide's Hollywood Link 5) Skeptik Sinikian 1) Mediators Look Forward to Next Armenian-Azeri Summit (RFE/RL)--International mediators on Friday, ended another round of shuttle diplomacy on a cautiously optimistic note. The French, Russian, and US diplomats acting under the aegis of the OSCE Minsk Group reiterated, after longer-than-planned talks with Armenian President Robert Kocharian, that though a compromise peace deal is visible, there are no guarantees. "We have made a considerable degree of progress in the past year in discussing these issues between the sides," the group's American co-chair, Steven Mann, told a joint news conference in Yerevan. "We still have difficult issues before us, but I believe that objective conditions exist for that type of solution before the end of the year." "But there are very difficult issues that are still on the table and real gaps between the two sides," he added without elaborating. "So although the possibility exists to resolve the conflict, there is no guarantee that it will happen." Mann's Russian counterpart, Yuri Merzlyakov, described the mediators' meeting with Kocharian as "very open and substantive," saying that it focused on the unspecified "key elements of the basis of the future settlement." Merzlyakov said the main result of the troika's visit to Baku, Stepanakert and Yerevan was a confirmation of Kocharian's next meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev. The Armenian-Azerbaijani summit will take place in the Russian city of Kazan in late August shortly after another meeting of the two countries' foreign ministers, he said. When asked whether the co-chairs anticipate a breakthrough in Kazan, Merzlyakov replied, "We very much hope that this will happen, but not everything depends on us." "These are two very serious men," Mann said for his part. "So I, for one, have the expectation that this will be a detailed and, I hope, very productive discussion." Arkady Ghukasian, the president of the Mountainous Karabagh Republic, told journalists in Stepanakert on Friday that Azerbaijan has adopted a "more constructive" stance and has toned down its militant rhetoric. "Today Azerbaijan is expressing readiness to discuss topics that were closed for them in the past," Ghukasian said, singling out the pivotal issue of Karabagh's future status. "The Azeri leadership is discussing that issue today both with the mediators and the leadership of Armenia," he said. Azerbaijan's Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov insisted on Friday that the negotiating process is being held "on the basis of Azerbaijan's territorial integrity and the country's constitution." The search for peace, however, could be complicated by Azerbaijan's parliamentary elections and a constitutional referendum in Armenia that are scheduled for this November. "Theoretically, these events should have no impact on the negotiating process," said Bernard Fassier, France's chief Karabagh negotiator. "But that is a theory. I can't predict what will happen in practice in the political life of both countries during the pre-election campaign." 2) Reps. Matsui, Strickland Join Congressional Armenian Caucus WASHINGTON, DC (ANCA)--Support continued to grow for Armenian issues on Capitol Hill this week as Representatives Doris Matsui (D-CA) and Ted Strickland (D-OH) announced their membership in the Congressional Armenian Caucus. The latest additions bring the Caucus to over 140 members. "We are gratified that Representatives Strickland and Matsui have joined the Congressional Caucus and look forward to continuing to work closely with the body to further increase its membership and promote Armenian American community concerns," stated Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) Executive Director, Aram Hamparian. Rep. Strickland joined 98 of his Congressional colleagues this week in cosponsoring the Armenian Genocide resolution (H.Res.316), lead by Representatives George Radanovich (R-CA), Adam Schiff (D-CA), and Congressional Armenian Caucus Co-Chairs Joe Knollenberg (R-MI) and Frank Pallone (D-NJ). In 1997, soon after his first election to office, Rep. Strickland voted in support of the Radanovich-Pallone amendment, which maintained US restrictions on aid to Azerbaijan until it lifts its blockades of Armenia and Mountainous Karabagh. The six-term congressman serves on the powerful House Energy and Commerce as well as the Veterans' Affairs committee. A native of Lucasville, Ohio, Rep. Strickland received a Ph.D in Counseling and Psychology and served as a minister, a psychologist, and a college professor prior to his election to the House of Representatives. "I am happy to be part of a group that supports a free and independent Armenia," said Rep. Strickland. "It is important for Members of Congress to recognize the tragic history of the Armenian people, and work toward a future which allows for a secure, sovereign nation for all Armenians." Rep. Doris Matsui (D-CA) is a first term congresswoman representing the Sacramento area. She succeeded her husband, Rep. Robert Matsui, who had been a long-time supporter of Armenian American concerns and a member of the Armenian Caucus. Rep. Robert Matsui tragically lost his battle against a form of bone marrow cancer in January, 2005. Within months of her election to office, Rep. Doris Matsui began active support of Armenian American concerns, cosigning the Congressional letter to President Bush urging him to properly characterize the Armenian Genocide as 'genocide.' She is also a cosponsor of the Armenian Genocide Resolution (H.Res.316). "I am pleased to join the Armenian Caucus and look forward to working with the Caucus on a range of political and educational activities," noted Rep. Matsui. 3) Intellectuals Concerned with Fate of Armenian Monuments in Turkey YEREVAN (Armenpress)--Members of the Armenian intellectual community on Friday welcomed the Armenian government's efforts seeking international recognition of the Armenian genocide, but urged it to condemn the wanton destruction of Armenian monuments within the Turkey's borders. Institute of Oriental Studies Turkish Division head, Ruben Safrastian, said thousands of Armenian cultural monuments are today subject to a policy of willful neglect and destruction on the part of Turkish authorities. This policy violates Turkey's commitments under the 1923 Lausanne Treaty, which clearly notes that "the Turkish government undertakes to grant full protection to the churches of Turkish nationals belonging to non-Moslem minorities." Safrastian said Armenian authorities must make full use of relevant international legislation to stop the barbaric policy of Turkey and urged Armenian authorities to raise this issue at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), saying PACE would not hesitate to offer its support. He said Turkey has also signed various treaties that provide for the protection of monuments. These treaties include the 1954 Hague treaty and the UNESCO treaties of 1970 and 1972. He said Turkey actively uses these treaties to sue for possession of cultural artifacts that originate within its territory. 4) Author Uncovers Armenian Genocide's Hollywood Link Ed Minassian investigates why a big studio, poised to take on a big production of Forty Days of Musa Dagh, dropped the project; he ventures not only into MGM archives and the authors personal papers, but also the State Department's file on the matter. By Brooke Bryant MORAGA( Knight Ridder)--As a child in the 1930s, Ed Minasian often found refuge in the movie theater across the street from the three-story tenement where he grew up in Massachusetts. "From our window I could see the Grace Episcopal Church, and next to it was the Capitol Theater. On some Sundays, I chose the latter over the former," Minasian said. At 10 cents a show, it was the best entertainment value of the day, and the darkened theater offered an escape from everyday woes. There was plenty to escape from: The Depression was in full swing on one side of the ocean, Adolf Hitler was coming to power on the other, and in the Armenian community he grew up in, the memory of the atrocities committed against his people during the genocide that began in 1915 was still fresh. Turkish forces, trying to purge Turkey of Armenians, caused the deaths of 1.5 million people in outright killings or in forced deportations that led to starvation during World War I. The Turkish government denies the genocide occurred. For someone of Armenian descent, it rarely takes long for the conversation to circle around to the genocide 90 years ago. For Minasian, it takes no time at all for the conversation to circle around to movies. The 80-year-old Moraga, California, resident, who lost siblings during the mass killings, has spent 24 years researching the place where those two circles intersect: 1930s Hollywood. His findings, which he hopes to publish in a book, detail how the Turkish government managed to squelch repeated attempts by MGM studios to make a movie about the genocide. The Armenian community--scattered throughout the world after the genocide - had hoped the film would finally bring international attention to their plight, and he felt the loss keenly. "All of us knew, yes, Turkey had something to do with stopping that movie from being made, but we never knew who, what, when, where, why?" Minasian said. "Well, I found out." He was 10 when the book that piqued MGM's interest--Franz Werfel's "The Forty Days of Musa Dagh"--came out in 1934. It quickly topped the best-seller charts, but it was another 10 years before he finally sat down to read it. By then Minasian was in the Air Force, "stationed in a godforsaken place in west Texas called Rattlesnake Army Air Base," where they trucked in girls from nearby towns on the weekends to dance with the GIs. "None of us ever got to finish a dance, because we were always cut in, but I had plenty of time to read in my off hours," he said. He found the book at the base library. "I read that book more often than any other book. I used to read it every April... because April is the anniversary of the genocide." Werfel's novel is a fictionalized account of the following events: Having heard about the soaring death tolls on the forced "death marches" to the Syrian desert, the villagers of Musa Dagh decided to resist Turkish forces. Nearly two months later, the survivors were rescued by the French, who spotted their distress banners from nearby ships. The villagers were relocated to the Middle East, where they formed a community in the Anjar area of present-day Lebanon, says Barlow Der Mugrdechian, a professor of Armenian Studies at Fresno State University who knows of Minasian's project. The incident is "a well-known story to the Armenians." But the book, written by an Austrian Jew as Hitler was gaining influence, had an even broader appeal. It was embraced with particular enthusiasm by Jews who saw it as an inspirational tale, and Germany quickly banned the book. "I say, look, if the world had responded to the Armenian genocide, there might not have been a Holocaust," Minasian says. When MGM bought the rights, intending to bring the story to the screen with the help of Hollywood greats like producer Irving Thalberg and Armenian director Rouben Mamoulian, Armenians everywhere were ecstatic, he recalled. "That wonderful book is going to be made into a movie, and that movie will play all over the world, and finally our story of the genocide will get out." The celebration was short-lived. MGM soon dropped that project and several subsequent attempts over the next few decades. It was widely rumored that the deal collapsed under pressure from the Turkish government, and in 1981, Minasian decided to find out exactly what had happened. Over the next decades, Minasian sifted through archives from Armenian newspapers, Hollywood institutions and the US State Department to piece together a picture of the doomed flick's fate. Between raising a family and pursuing a teaching career, he has written articles on the topic published by the National Association for Armenian Studies and a 300-page manuscript he hopes to publish soon. "He's done a rather thorough study of this whole issue," says UCLA professor Richard Hovannisian, a leading scholar of Armenian studies. Turkey's role in the movie's demise isn't a matter of speculation; it's well-documented in diplomatic correspondences in the US State Department archives, he said. "(The movie) would have attracted worldwide attention on the screen, so the quashing of the work was a blow to historical memory." In his quest to document who dealt that blow, Minasian was granted rare access to MGM's archives by the studio's story editor Samuel Marx, and he spent more than a week sifting through four grocery carts filled with files on the Musa Dagh movie. He dictated the interesting bits into his tape recorder. It took nearly three years after that to transcribe the recordings into notes. Over the years, he also read through Werfel's papers housed at UCLA and the scripts kept by the American Film Institute. To cap it off, he used the Freedom of Information Act to get the State Department's file on MGM and the Musa Dagh movie. Minasian knows he faces a few publishing hurdles. To begin with, he's an unknown author with no agent, and also, he's been told his subject is "esoteric" and "passe." He figures he may end up self-publishing the book. His passion for film is one of the forces driving the project, evident in the old movie posters lining his walls. Conversations about almost anything can lead back to movies, from the book Minasian just finished reading ("The Da Vinci Code," whose movie version will star Tom Hanks) to Armenia's early embrace of Christianity (which elicits a reference to the recent Crusades flick "Kingdom of Heaven"). When "Sideways" came out last year, Minasian was the first to spread the word throughout the local Armenian community: Some of the final scenes feature an Armenian-American wedding, filmed at a real Southern California Armenian church. For Minasian, the genocide isn't just history, it's family history. His parents both survived the massacre but lost their first spouses and some of their children. His mother was 19 when she watched the men in her village, including her first husband, marched away by Turkish soldiers, carrying the shovels to dig their own graves. His mother and sister joined the long line of Armenians forced to march toward the Syrian desert with only as much food and water as they could carry. His father was already living in the United States, hoping to send for his first wife and three children back in Turkey, when the massacre began. Only one daughter from that marriage survived, and when Minasian met her in 1976, she told him about a brother he had never heard of, who died of typhus at age 3 on one of the forced marches. Minasian, who still wonders why his father never mentioned the little boy, now carries a copy of the child's picture in his wallet. His work is a tribute to them. "I see it as my legacy for my folks, who were survivors, and so many of the people I came to know in my youth and even now," he said. "You see, we're not fighting for vengeance, we're fighting for justice. We want the Turkish government to own up to what they did." 5) Skeptik Sinikian SILENCE OF THE TURKISH LAMBS Attention: No sheep or other types of livestock were intentionally harmed in the production of this column. However, I did spill some coffee on the wool sweater I was wearing. I've read my share of peculiar news in my lifetime and that's not including my regular dose of the Weekly World News. (This week's exclusive about a woman who was raped by a leprechaun is worth a read. There's even a picture of her green baby. Don't believe me? Visit ). But I digress. I have to thank Armen Abrahamian for bringing to my attention the news story that inspired this week's column. After reading his forwarded article, and verifying the source, I laughed uncontrollably for 3 minutes straight. Here's the headline from the Associated Press which appeared on Friday, July 8, 2005. "450 Sheep Jump to Their Deaths in Turkey." In what is probably the most ridiculous/peculiar news story of all time, 1500 sheep jumped off of a cliff in the village of Gevas, located in Van province in eastern Turkey, for absolutely no reason according to witnesses. Only 450 of them died as the remainder of the flock who leaped to their demise came to land upon a soft, cuddly, fluffy PILE OF DEAD SHEEP! Again, I am not making this up. But seriously, am I the only one to suspect that the shepherds claiming innocence in this incident might not be telling the entire story? I've seen better liars while partying in Aruba! I'm waiting for reports to surface detailing that the sheep were being chased by a shepherd with a penchant for "buggery" and a video camera. I can just imagine the police interrogation. Turkish Police: So Efendi, explain what happened again. Gevas Shepherd: We were sitting on that hill over there, sipping coffee, minding our own business, when all of a sudden we heard a series of "thud" sounds--1500 to be exact. TP: What were the sheep running away from? Was anything running after them? GS: Uh?.I don't know. It happened very fast. TP: And is this your DVD copy of "Sheeps Gone Wild" and "Very Baaaaad Sheep?" GS: Uh? (hanging head in shame)--yes. Yes, it is. TP: Can I borrow it? I promise I'll get it back to you. In spite of the "shear" stupidity and obscurity of this story, I do feel bad for such a great loss of fine sheep. After all, Stalin once remarked that, "One death is a tragedy; a million is a statistic." Just think of how many gyro or shawerma sandwiches that would have made! But here's another sad statistic that made me think. According to AP, "the estimated loss to families in the town of Gevas tops $100,000, a significant amount of money in a country where average GDP per head is around $2,700." Every family had an average of 20 sheep and now, only a few are left with sheep making times very difficult for the people of Gevas. A GDP per head of around $2,700--wow! Let the good times roll! Free Sheepskin seat covers for EVERYONE! Let me put that statistic in perspective. The average GDP for the European Union is approximately $26,900. So Turkey, which aspires to become a member of the European Union, has a GDP that is one tenth that of the EU. Needless to say, our Turkish friends are not ready for Prime Time yet. In fact, I'd suggest they stabilize their economy by counseling their livestock in order to prevent any other future mass suicide attempts. Wait! I have a brilliant idea. Someone get the Turkish Foreign Minister on the phone right away! I checked to see how much a sheep would cost if I wanted to buy one. (WHAT? I was curious! Like you've never wanted to buy a sheep? Stop judging me and read on!) Apparently, a good sheep (who knows what constitutes "good") costs anywhere between $200 to $1000. By my rough calculations, we can buy back the province of Van or a few of the towns/villages or whatever with about 1500 sheep or approximately anywhere between 300,000 to 1.5 million dollars. We can start a brand new program like the United Nations's Oil for Food Program. Sheep for Land! It's so simple, it has to work. And after Armenians have repatriated to their ancestral lands, the Europeans can have Turkey--pathetic GDP, sheep and all. Former US Ambassador to Turkey, William B. Macomber once wrote that "It has always seemed unfortunate to me that the people of the United States and the people of Turkey, whose nations are important allies, do not know one another better. Too often each thinks of the other in the simplified terms of cultural stereotype." Simplified terms? Stereotypes? I am not a person who will prejudge or generalize any individuals or groups. But you have to admit that the sheep story doesn't really help Turkey gain points in the eyes of Europe. Much of Turkey is still backwards, extremely rural, and apparently can't even raise sheep. How can a country that can't take care of livestock and much less its own poverty stricken populace, expect to earn a seat in the EU? The Turks want to play the race/religion card against the Europeans every chance they get. But all a European has to do to see that there's incompatibility between Turkey and Europe is to visit Turkey's Ministry of Tourism Website. There's a whole section on "Curses." Yes, curses. Here's what the official government website has to say about curses. "Curses are an essential component of everyday life, and an important element of popular wisdom." Good to know. Next time I'm in Turkey I'll be sure to use such cultural gems as "May your blood boil in August, but your cooking pot in winter, mistaking a white dog for a sheep!" That was an actual Turkish curse. How is the average French or Irish citizen or any other EU member going to relate to someone who hails from a nation whose official Ministry of Tourism boasts four different curses about lice on its website. Lice! Here they are in no particular order and here's the link (): -May you be crawling with lice (pretty self explanatory if you ask me) -May you get lice (apparently the first one was not very direct) -May lice eat your back and a dog your bread (the dog's a nice touch in this one, I didn't see it coming but it works well with the whole lice theme) - I hope you get lice and fleas (just in case the dog that ate your bread was wearing a flea collar) I'm still perplexed by the whole story but it has provided me some food for thought. In researching the validity of the facts, I came across some information that has raised more questions than it has answered. In fact, I'm going to delve deeper into Turkish culture and hopefully bring to you some more gems. Stay tuned! Skeptik Sinikian is looking for a few good sheep to begin the Sheep for Land Program. Any Turkish shepherds interested can contact him at [email protected] or visit his blog at <; All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and subscription requests. (c) 2005 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved. ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through mass media outlets.

WWW.ASBAREZ.COM
www.weeklyworldnews.com/features/sex/61273
www.Sinikian.blogspot.com.

Announcement of The NGOs About The Revised Draft Constitution

ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS ABOUT THE REVISED
DRAFT CONSTITUTION
A1+
13-07-2005
On July 7, 2005, the RA authorities sent the revised draft
constitution to the Venice Commission and on August 29 a NA special
session will be convened to discuss the draft.
Several non-governmental organizations have made announcements about
the revised draft constitution. Among them are the Yerevan Press Club,
the Armenian Union of Journalists, the non-governmental organization
`Internews’, the Committee defending free speech right, the
non-governmental organization `Investigating Journalists’, the
investigating center `Tim’, and the `Asparez’ club of journalists of
Gyumri.
The announcement of the non-governmental organizations refers
especially to a point according to which the RA National Assembly is
to appoint the embers of the body regulating the work of the e-Media.
According to the announcement, the corresponding clause of the revised
draft constitution which has been sent to the Venice Commission, does
not give the best solution of the issue of freedom and independence of
the Mass Media and does not fully express the principles of `agreed
conclusions’.
It is also mentioned in the announcement that the Constitution must
include a clause prohibiting any form of censor. It calls the National
Assembly to include the offered clauses in the draft which will be
represented for the second reading.

Armenian-Russian agreement on volunteer migration prolonged

PanArmenian News
July 13 2005
ARMENIAN-RUSSIAN AGREEMENT ON VOLUNTEER MIGRATION PROLONGED
13.07.2005 05:13
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Today the Federation Council has ratified the
Armenian-Russian interparliamentary protocol, which prolongs the
validity of the agreement regulating the process of volunteer
migration of citizens. The document garnered support of 148 senators.
The agreement was signed in August 1997 with a 5-year term and the
possibility of prolongation for 5 more years. It determines the order
of migration of the citizens, who wish to settle in Russia and
Armenia. The migrants are freed of limitations for bringing in and
removing their property as well as customs duties. The protocol on
the agreement prolongation was signed March 4, 2004, Rosbalt news
agency reports.

Armentel Completes Digitization of ATEs of 4th, 5th, 6th Districts

ARMENTEL COMPLETES DIGITIZATION OF ATE OF 4TH, 5TH AND 6TH DISTRICTS
OF YEREVAN’S NORK COMMUNITY
YEREVAN, JULY 8. ARMINFO. The ArmenTel telecom company has completed
the digitization of the automatic telephone exchanges of the 4th, 5th
and 6th districts of Yerevan’s Nork community.
Since July 1 the residents of the area will pay for their intracity
phone calls per minute.
In Feb-Mar 2005 ArmenTel spent $12 mln on the modernization of the ATE
of 7th, 8th and 9th Nork districts. In 2004 the company digitized
68.4% of Yerevan (216,400 subscribers) and 37.7% of Armenia (265,000).