RPA vice-chair accusing Armenia`s authorities of lies

ARMINFO
Marianna Mkrtchyan

ArmInfo. Armen Ashotyan, Vice-Chairman of the Republican Party of Armenia (RPA), has accused Armenia’s authorities of lying about Yerevan having allegedly  recognized Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity back in 1991. 

Speaking live on Facebook and commenting on the statement by Armenian  FM Ararat Mirzoyan and Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan that on  December 8, 1991, Yerevan and Baku signed the Agreement on  cooperation between independent states actually recognized each  other’s territorial integrity, Mr Ashotyan stated the claim is false.  And it can easily proved if one looks through the documents on the  CIS formation. 

“Nikol Pashinyan’s priority goal is clean himself of the blood and  sins of the Artsakh war, and he stops at nothing and keep on lying,”  stated Ashotyan. 

“The thesis that Armenia signed the Agreement on cooperation between  independent states thereby recognizing Azerbaijan’s territorial  integrity is false,” he said.  In this context, Mr Ashotyan stated  that the agreement was signed by Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, and  Armenia and Azerbaijan could not have signed it, as Minister Mirzoyan  claims.   

“In fact, official Yerevan signed the document in February 1992, and  official Baku in September 1993.  With reference to the point on  territorial integrity, it does not emphasize that Armenia and  Azerbaijan joined the CIS later by signing the so-called Alma Ata  Declaration,” Mr Ashotyan said.  

Also, the Agreement contains the phrase “inalienable right to  self-determination.” 

“My question: if Mr Mirzoyan erroneously refers to the agreement on  CIS and speaks of territorial integrity, why does not he refer to the  ‘inalienable right to self-determination’, which is part of the  agreement? Moreover, beside the Agreement on CIS and Declaration on  accession to the CIS, there is a third fundamental document, the CIS  Charter, approved in 1993. And Article 3 of the Charter defines  ‘inalienable right of people to self-determination’,” Mr Ashotyan  said. 

In this context, the RPA vice-chairman pointed out that the RA  Supreme Council ratified the Agreement on cooperation with  reservations.   

     In particularly, the RA Supreme Council, in the fourth paragraph of  the preamble to the Agreement replaced the phrase “inalienable right  to self-determination” with “inalienable right of people to self-  determination.” So the wording of the first paragraph of Article 5  was as follows: “The High Contracting Parties recognize and respect  the right of nations to self-determination, each other’s territorial  integrity and inviolability of borders.” 

“Nikols are ignoring the principles of importance for Armenia and  disseminating pro-Azerbaijani ideas.  Active diplomatic processes  related to Nagorno-Karabakh are under way and are being concealed  from the people. We must stop it. Artsakh has always been and must  remain Armenian,” Mr Ashotyan said. 

On March 15, Armenian FM Ararat Mirzoyan stated that Yerevan applied  to the OSCE MG co- chairmanship for negotiations over a peace  agreement with Azerbaijan. Speaking of the five points of  Azerbaijan’s proposals, he stressed that any negotiations must be  held without preconditions. 

“As regards the proposals such, the two countries actually recognized  each other’s territorial integrity and agrees that they have no  mutual territorial claims by signing the Agreement on cooperation  between independent states on December 8, 1991,” Mr Mirzoyan said. 

Before Armenians flourished in Bombay and Calcutta, they found a thriving home in Surat

Scroll, India
March 1 2022
HISTORY REMEMBERED

Asbarez: Congress Calls for $45 Million in U.S. Aid to Armenia; Additional Oversight on U.S. Aid to Azerbaijan

ANCA Continues Campaign for Increased U.S. Aid to Artsakh as Azerbaijani Attacks Escalate

WASHINGTON—The House and Senate have agreed to send $45 million in U.S. aid to Armenia and $2 million in de-mining assistance for Artsakh as part of the Fiscal Year 2022 Foreign Aid Bill adopted this week by the U.S. House. The sweeping appropriations measure also calls for a report assessing the possibilities of additional attacks against Artsakh (Nagorno Karabakh) by a South Caucasus country and additional oversight of how funds to Armenia and Azerbaijan are used, reported the Armenian National Committee of America.

“The FY22 foreign aid bill represents yet another missed opportunity for a robust U.S. aid package – of at least $50 million – in direct humanitarian aid to the more than 100,000 Armenians ethnically cleansed by Azerbaijan from Artsakh,” said ANCA Executive Director Aram Hamparian. “This long-overdue aid – which we are already working to secure in the FY23 bill – is desperately needed within Artsakh to help Armenian families rebuild their lives and resettle in safety upon their indigenous homeland.”

The FY22 foreign aid bill specifies that “not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence, consistent with the protection of intelligence sources and methods, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report assessing the likelihood of a South Caucasus country taking military action against another country (including in Nagorno-Karabakh or any other disputed territory). Such report shall include an indication of the strategic balance in the region, including with respect to the offensive military capabilities of each South Caucasus country.”  The committees that would receive the report include the Senate and House Committees on Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Armed Services. The South Caucasus countries referenced in the bill are Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia.

The report accompanying the FY22 foreign aid bill instructs that “prior to the initial obligation of funds appropriated under title IV of the Act for assistance for Armenia and Azerbaijan, the Secretary of State shall consult with the Committees on Appropriations on the proposed uses of such funds.”  This would include specific oversight of U.S. military funding to Azerbaijan, which was the subjecting of a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, requested by Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Menendez (D-CA), which revealed that the State Department consistently failed to inform Congress of the impact of over $164 million in assistance to Baku on the military balance between Azerbaijan and Armenia.  

Last week, in letters to Senate and House Appropriations Committee Chairs and Ranking Members, Congressional Armenian Caucus Co-Chairs Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Jackie Speier (D-CA), Vice-Chair Adam Schiff (D-CA), and Representatives Anna Eshoo (D-CA) and Jim Costa (D-CA) called for $50,000,000 to be “made available for assistance in Nagorno-Karabakh, used to provide humanitarian assistance and resettlement support to the Armenian victims of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, both those residing in and those displaced from Nagorno-Karabakh. Such assistance will help to meet basic human needs, including maternity healthcare and drinking water programs.”  

The ANCA, in letters to over 20 key Senate and House members, made the case for sending $50 million in U.S. aid for Artsakh, noting “As you and your professional staff are aware, since Azerbaijan’s attack against Artsakh, the U.S. Agency for International Development has delivered negligible humanitarian aid to over 90,000 displaced Armenians. This is not acceptable and inconsistent with America’s broad, rich, and deep tradition of assisting victims of war crimes.”

Over 50,000 ANCA Rapid Responders have already contacted their Senators and Representatives in support of expanded U.S. aid to Artsakh and Armenia. To take action, visit anca.org/aid.

The ANCA’s calls for expanded aid to Artsakh come as Azerbaijan continues its shelling of Khramort and Nakhichanik of the Askeran region of Artsakh and the villages of Khnushinak and Karmir Shuka of the Martuni region in Artsakh.  Earlier this week, Armenian Sergeant Hrach Arami Manasaryan was killed by Azerbaijani gunfire on the western Armenia-Azerbaijan border in Armenia’s Ararat Province.

AW: Musical artist Ara Topouzian wins 2022 Michigan Heritage Award

Ara Topouzian

EAST LANSING, Mich. – The Michigan Traditional Arts Program of Michigan State University has announced that musician Ara Topouzian is among the 2022 Michigan Heritage Awards honorees in the annual statewide program recognizing artists, practitioners and community organizers working in the folk and traditional arts and everyday culture in Michigan. 

“I would like to thank Michigan State University and the Michigan Traditional Arts Program for honoring me with this award,” said Topouzian, a resident of Bloomfield Hills in Oakland County, in a written statement to the Weekly. “I am very proud to be an Armenian and to be part of a vibrant arts community in Michigan. A sincere thank you to all those that have supported my musical achievements over the years and contributed to this nomination as well!”

Topouzian, who plays the kanun (an ancient harp instrument), was recognized for his achievements in traditional Armenian music performance.

The Michigan Heritage Award (MHA) is the state’s highest distinction to honor individuals and groups who have dedicated themselves to the teaching, preservation, presentation and growth of their traditional art form. This includes familial, cultural, ethnic, religious, occupational and regional traditions. 

“The Michigan Heritage Awards are modeled after the National Heritage Fellowships awarded by the National Endowment for the Arts. Similar programs exist in most states, serving to reflect and celebrate the diversity of cultural expressions found in the United States. Since 1985, over 130 Michigan artists and  cultural organizations have received Michigan Heritage Awards,” explains Micah Ling, public programs coordinator for the Michigan Traditional Arts Program. 

The remaining awardees include:

– Alfred Bruce Bradley of Flint (Genesee County) for community leadership in tap dance
– Drs. William (1933-2017) and Yvonne Lockwood of Chelsea (Washtenaw County) for  documentation, preservation and publication of Michigan traditional art, folklife and culture
– Ukrainian Bandurist Chorus of the Detroit Metro Area (Wayne County), for community organizing, supporting and promoting Ukrainian bandura music 

Awardees were selected after a review of nominations by an independent panel of traditional arts specialists and practitioners. 

“We receive nominations both from groups with whom we have existing relationships, like past participants in our apprenticeship program or fieldwork documentation projects, and from new  connections,” noted Ling. “It is always exciting to see which Michiganders and traditions will be nominated and selected.”

Michigan Traditional Arts Program director Marsha MacDowell recognizes that “the program widens public awareness about the breadth and depth of traditional arts and culture in the state.”

A virtual celebration will be held this summer. An in-person celebration will be announced at a later date. 

 The Michigan Traditional Arts Program is a statewide program “to advance cross-cultural understanding and equity in a diverse society through the documentation, preservation, and presentation of traditional arts, folklife, and everyday culture in Michigan.” MTAP is headquartered at MSU’s Residential College  in the Arts and Humanities and is supported by MATRIX: Center for Digital Humanities and Social  Sciences, MSU’s Office of University Outreach and Engagement, and the Michigan State University Museum.




CivilNet: Nagorno-Karabakh and the Russian invasion of Ukraine

CIVILNET.AM

01 Mar, 2022 10:03

Early in the morning of February 24, Russia launched a large-scale invasion in Ukraine, muddling the international order which had evolved since the end of the Cold War. In a new article, CivilNet analyst Tigran Grigoryan discusses the challenges this new geopolitical reality will pose for Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh.

Credits: Ruptly

Armenia: Donbass recognition not on the table

Feb 23 2022

PanARMENIAN.Net – The recognition of Ukraine’s breakaway regions of Donetsk and Luhansk are not on the table, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Vahan Hunanyan said on Wednesday, February 23.

When asked by Armenpress whether he considers the recognition of the self-proclaimed People’s Republics of Donetsk and Luhansk by Armenia possible, Hunanyan said “there is no such issue on the agenda.”

The spokesperson also said that Yerevan wants issues between “the two friendly states” – Russia and Ukraine – to be resolved through diplomatic dialogue, negotiations, and in accordance with the norms and principles of international law and the UN Charter.

“We hope for the necessary steps to be undertaken towards reducing the tension and resolving the situation peacefully,” he added.

Western allies imposed economic sanctions on Russia after President Vladimir Putin recognized the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk in eastern Ukraine as independent states.

Erdogan Has a Lot Riding on the Russia-Ukraine Crisis

WPR
By Iyad Dakka
Feb. 23, 2022
As the threat of war between Russia and Ukraine looms ever larger,
Turkey finds itself between a rock and a hard place. It does not want
to antagonize Russia, with which it shares strategically vital
interests, but it also needs to show its support for Ukraine and its
NATO allies in the face of the greatest threat to European security in
the post-Cold War era. This has forced Turkey to walk a finely
calibrated diplomatic tightrope over the past month.
During his visit to Kyiv on Feb. 3, Turkish President Recep Tayiip
Erdogan proclaimed his support for Ukrainian sovereignty, reiterated
his opposition to the annexation of Crimea and signed a landmark free
trade agreement to signal Turkey’s commitment to the long-term
relationship with Ukraine. This was balanced, however, with an offer
to defuse the situation by convening a trilateral summit with Russian
President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in
Ankara or Istanbul. Erdogan continues to press this proposal with
Putin.
The urgency and importance of Erdogan’s diplomatic overtures are
understandable. Ankara has sunk its economic teeth into Ukraine and
could end up being one of the main economic losers if Russia invades.
In 2021, Turkey became the largest foreign investor in Ukraine, with
investments in excess of $4 billion. There are currently over 700
Turkish companies operating on the ground. In the past five years,
Turkish exports to Ukraine have nearly doubled to $2.6 billion, while
imports have risen sharply from $2.8 billion to $4.4 billion.
Bilateral cooperation is moving particularly quickly in the defense
and aerospace sectors. Since 2019, Kyiv has acquired an estimated
dozen Bayraktar drones, Turkey’s flagship military export at the
moment. The Ukrainian navy has also ordered two MILGEM Ava-class
corvettes, which will be jointly produced on Turkish and Ukrainian
soil. The two sides have already signed an agreement to build training
and maintenance facilities for Turkish drones in Ukraine, and they
have followed this up by signing an agreement for the joint production
of next-generation drones that will leverage Turkish avionic and
Ukrainian jet-engine technology.
Turkey understands full well that regime-change in Ukraine would put
these investments and strategic commercial relationships at risk. But
despite the flurry of diplomacy, Turkey’s room for maneuverability is
somewhat limited, and its diplomatic influence in resolving this
crisis is likely to be modest. There are a few reasons for this.
First, what Russia ultimately wants from Ukraine can only truly be
provided by the United States and major European powers. Washington,
Paris, Berlin and London are the only players that can work with
Russia to establish a new European security architecture. And Russia
is unlikely to provide Ankara any free diplomatic wins when it views
Turkey as a peripheral player in this crisis. Reports that Erdogan
wanted to mediate have been circulating for almost a month. When asked
if it had anything further to add such a potential meeting, the
Kremlin seemed rather blasé about the idea, simply stating it had no
details to share. One would think that if Russia felt Turkey’s good
offices were instrumental to achieving even some of its objectives,
this meeting would have already happened.
Second, the balance of interests in this crisis overwhelmingly tips
toward Russia. Put another way, despite Turkey’s economic interests,
Ukraine is not, and will not become, a national security red line for
Ankara. By contrast, the Kremlin views a potential NATO-allied Ukraine
as an unacceptable outcome that must be prevented at all costs. The
cold and hard facts are that Russia will go to war to ensure Ukraine
doesn’t ever join NATO, whereas Turkey could live with a Ukraine under
Russian domination if it ultimately had to. This is the quiet part
that the Turks won’t say out loud anytime soon.
Finally, there is a structural imbalance of power in the Black Sea
region that heavily favors Moscow. The Turkish fleet in the Black Sea
is relatively modest, and this imbalance has further tilted in favor
of Russia since its annexation of Crimea in 2014, which allowed Moscow
to expand its anti-access/area denial zone in the area. And while
Turkey would like its NATO partners and Ukraine to help counterbalance
Russian hegemony in the area, Ankara wants this to be managed smartly
and carefully. The Turks do not want any regional security deals
between Russia and NATO to undermine the 1936 Montreux Convention—a
historic treaty that grants Turkey full sovereignty over the Bosphorus
and Dardanelles straits while governing the flow of merchant and
military vessels into the Black Sea. Echoing these concerns at the
NATO ministerial meeting last week, Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi
Akar stated that the Montreux Convention had brought  “balance,
stability and security in the Black Sea. ... We have explained and
continue to explain on every occasion that this is of vital
importance.”
Of course, none of this means Turkey and Russia will not continue to
engage on Ukraine. Despite viewing Ankara as a peripheral diplomatic
actor in this crisis, Russia does have things to discuss. For example,
it wants the Turks to slow or stop advanced weapons transfers to the
Ukrainians, including Bayraktar drones. The Kremlin would also welcome
Turkish pressure on NATO from the inside, particularly when it comes
to further socializing the West to Russia’s long-term security
interests. These things alone will entice the Russians to keep the
lines of engagement open with Ankara and will, on the surface at
least, ensure that Erdogan is never given a hard “no” when it comes to
his offers to mediate.
For Turkey, the diplomatic efforts are worth pursuing regardless of
their prospects for success. Ankara sees an opportunity to recalibrate
its reputation as a stabilizing regional power, after a decade of
being accused of reckless militaristic adventurism in Syria, Libya and
the Eastern Mediterranean. There is also a domestic play at stake for
Erdogan. At a time when the Turkish economy is reeling under the
weight of inflation, and with an eye to the 2023 presidential
elections, the ruling Justice and Development Party, or AKP, wants to
leverage the crisis to bolster Erdogan’s image as a wise and capable
leader. Erdogan’s AKP party spokesperson made this clear when he
claimed, “The most important countries of the world are able to put
forward an approach that can address one side of this crisis. But our
president is putting out diplomacy that appeals to both sides of the
crisis."
But most important, perhaps, is the possibility that Erdogan and Putin
might make things work despite all odds. They have, after all,
perfected the art of “transactional geopolitics”—the ability to make
micro-deals even when they disagree on the big picture. This way of
doing business has held up relatively well in various geopolitical
theatres, from Syria and Libya to the Caucasus. This potentially
explains why Turkey allows its companies to trade with Crimea and
Abkhazia, despite its official position in support of the territorial
integrity of Ukraine and Georgia, respectively. There’s very little
reason to expect that Ukraine will change the name of the game between
Ankara and Moscow.
*
Iyad Dakka is a fellow with the Centre for Modern Turkish Studies at
Carleton University’s Norman Paterson School of International Affairs
in Ottawa, Canada.
 

MFA Armenia strongly condemns prosecution of Artsakh’s President and two former Presidents of Armenia by Azerbaijan

Save

Share

 20:37,

YEREVAN, 21 FEBRUARY, ARMENPERESS. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia has issued a statement over initiating criminal prosecution against President of Artsakh Arayik Harutyunyan and two former Presidents of Armenia Robert Kocharyan and Serzh Sargsyan by Azerbaijani authorities and declaring them internationally wanted, strongly condemning these trumped-up and anti-Armenian persecutions, as well as the abuse of international legal procedures, ARMENPRESS was informed from the MFA Armenia.

“Recently it became known that the Azerbaijani authorities have initiated criminal prosecution, have declared an international search for Artsakh President Arayik Harutyunyan, former Presidents of Armenia Robert Kocharyan and Serzh Sargsyan.

“We strongly condemn these criminal prosecutions initiated by Azerbaijan on these trumped-up and anti-Armenian grounds, as well as similar abuses of international legal procedures,” the statement said.

According to the Armenian MFA, instead of trying to find the people involved in the extrajudicial killings of Artsakh civilians, the forced disappearances of Armenian prisoners of war, as well as the criminal networks that brought terrorists to the region, Azerbaijan is pursuing its anti-Armenian policy in Nagorno Karabakh with a new impetus, making new attempts to raise tensions on Armenia-Azerbaijan border.

The Armenian Foreign Ministry calls on Azerbaijan to seek solutions in the constructive field, to take steps to protect the rights and well-being of all the peoples of the region, while reaffirming the Republic of Armenia’s commitment to making efforts for peaceful coexistence and mutual tolerance in the region”.

Central Bank of Armenia: exchange rates and prices of precious metals – 21-02-22

Save

Share

 17:30,

YEREVAN, 21 FEBUARY, ARMENPRESS. The Central Bank of Armenia informs “Armenpress” that today, 21 February, USD exchange rate down by 0.30 drams to 478.70 drams. EUR exchange rate down by 0.82 drams to 543.80 drams. Russian Ruble exchange rate down by 0.10 drams to 6.22 drams. GBP exchange rate up by 0.17 drams to 652.66 drams.

The Central Bank has set the following prices for precious metals.

Gold price down by 15.95 drams to 29143.57 drams. Silver price up by 2.62 drams to 365.83 drams. Platinum price up by 174.28 drams to 16791.1 drams.

"Artsakh is Armenia" banner paraded during Marseille–Qarabag match

Feb 18 2022

PanARMENIAN.Net – Members of the Armenian community of France paraded a banner that read “Karabakh/Artsakh is Armenia” during a match between Olympique de Marseille and Azerbaijan’s FC Qarabag on Thursday, February 17.

FRA Nor Seround posted pictures and videos from the match, showing community members waving said banner and Armenian tricolors.

The organization staged a similar campaign back in 2014.