Yerevan Zoo Gets Ready For The Opening Of The Season

YEREVAN ZOO GETS READY FOR THE OPENING OF THE SEASON

ARMENPRESS
APRIL 29, 2009
YEREVAN

The Yerevan zoo gets ready for the opening of the season. This year
it will too open on May 1.

Director of the zoo park Sahak Abovian told Armenpress that
at present renovation is being conducted in the zoo to meet the
visitors on a proper level. According to him, this year’s works of
main reconstruction of the park will probably kick off in the second
half of the year.

There are 2 200 animals of 210 types in the Yerevan zoo. The number
of visitors to the zoo exceeds 150 000 each year.

Tendencies Of Process Acceleration Outlined In Nagorno Karabakh Sett

TENDENCIES OF PROCESS ACCELERATION OUTLINED IN NAGORNO KARABAKH SETTLEMENT PROCESS

NOYAN TAPAN
APRIL 28, 2009
YEREVAN

Tendencies of process acceleration are outlined in the Nagorno Karabakh
settlement process. OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs stated at the April 27
press conference. They expressed the hope that the meeting of RA and
Azeri Presidents to be held on May 7 in Prague will be constructive.

MG French Co-chair Bernard Fassier drew attention to much activation of
Co-chairs’ visits to the region and three meetings between Presidents
of Armenia and Azerbaijan in the past months. "There are reasonable
hopes for progress, and these hopes prompt us that Prague meeting
will be constructive. Everything depends on the two Presidents’ will,"
B. Fassier stated.

American Co-chair Matthew Bryza also expressed an analogous point
of view.

At the same time he refuted the assertion that U.S. State Secretary
Hillary Clinton made a statement about the possibility of that
problem’s solution within a month. "My leader stated that the conflict
may be solved within several months," he said.

According to MG Russian Co-chair Yuri Merzliakov, there are
all conditions for ensuring advance in the process of conflict
settlement. As to the possibility of Nagorno Karabakh conflict
settlement in the nearest time, Y. Merzliakov noted that time
predictions is the most difficult thing. In his words, everything
will depend on the decision the sides, in particular, Presidents
of Armenia and Azerbaijan, will make on the fundamental or basic
principles of settlement. The Russian diplomat said that after
coordination of these principles by the sides work will be done to
work out a peaceful agreement.

"Madrid principles" remain on the table, the Presidents continue
discussing them, discussion of many of these points is planned during
Prague meeting," B. Fassier stated. In his words, if necessary, a new
meeting between Serzh Sargsyan and Ilham Aliyev will be organized in
early June in Saint Petersburg. He also expressed conviction that both
Presidents intend to prepare the public opinion in their countries
for the purpose of forming an atmosphere of good neighborly relations.

M. Bryza said that both Presidents proceed from the fact that an
agreement on Nagorno Karabakh settlement should be balanced and
based on principles of self-determination, territorial integrity and
exclusion of use of force.

Assembly Letter to President Obama Expresses Disappointment

Armenian Assembly of America
1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202-393-3434
Fax: 202-638-4904
Email: [email protected]
Web:

PRESS RELEASE

April 27, 2009
Contact: Michael A Zachariades
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (202) 393-3434

ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA EXPRESSES DISAPPOINTMENT IN
APRIL 24TH COMMEMORATIVE STATEMENT

Vice-President Biden phones Assembly Chairman

Washington, DC – On April 24, 2009, Armenian Assembly of America
(Assembly) Chairman Hirair Hovnanian, sent a letter to President Barack
Obama expressing profound disappointment that the President had omitted
the word Genocide in his commemorative statement on the occasion of the
94th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.

That same afternoon, Vice-President Joseph Biden, Jr. telephoned
Chairman Hovnanian and they exchanged views on the history and status of
Armenian-American community efforts to obtain affirmation by the U.S.
government of the Armenian Genocide.

In his letter to President Obama, Mr. Hovnanian reminded the President
of his repeated promises to recognize the Armenian Genocide. Hovnanian
wrote, "Your use of Mets Yehern [Great Catastrophe] was an inadequate
substitute for Armenian Genocide," adding, "It was a regrettable retreat
from the expressed promises you made as a candidate…and in so doing,
may have taken a step backwards in genocide prevention around the
world."

The letter also pledged that the Assembly and the Armenian-American
community will pursue the prompt passage of House Resolution 252, and
requested that the President support the resolution which reaffirms the
United States record on the Armenian Genocide.

Additionally, Hovnanian cautioned that actions resulting from the
framework recently announced by Armenia and Turkey must be "distinct and
separate from the issue of the Armenian Genocide." He further requested
a meeting with President Obama to discuss problems and concerns of the
Armenian-American community regarding relations with Armenia.

Established in 1972, the Armenian Assembly of America is the largest
Washington-based nationwide organization promoting public understanding
and awareness of Armenian issues. The Assembly is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt
membership organization.

###
NR#2009-042

Editor’s Note:

Full text of the letter to President Obama
2009/AAAlettertoPresidentObama.pdf

http://aaainc.org/fileadmin/aaainc/pdf_1/Q2_
www.aaainc.org

Ruben Safrastyan: Obama excelled his predecessors

PanArmenian News, Armenia
April 24 2009

Ruben Safrastyan: Obama excelled his predecessors

25.04.2009 14:44 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ U.S. President Barack Obama excelled his
predecessors in his annual April 24 statement and this fact is
welcome, an Armenian professor said.

`Obama employed the term Genocide, which is used by Armenians and has
no legal power, while Genocide is the term used in international
law. Nevertheless, I think progress has been fixed and adoption of the
Armenian Genocide resolution will not be opposed by the White House
any longer,’ Ruben Safrastyan, director of the NAS RA Institute of
Oriental Studies, told PanARMENIAN.Net.

At that, he thinks that the joint statement issued by the Armenian and
Turkish Foreign Ministries was not the key reason for Obama’s not
saying `genocide’.

`Turkey is an important ally for U.S. in case with Afghanistan and
Iraq. The Armenian-Turkish relations have nothing to do with it,’
prof. Safrastyan said.

One step closer to cremation law

One step closer to cremation law
By Anna Hassapi

Cyprus Mail
25 April 2009

THE COUNCIL of Ministers has decided to include a provision allowing
Cypriot citizens to be cremated on the island, in a proposed bill
rights currently being prepared by Law Commissioner Leda Koursoumba.

In February, the Interior Ministry’s permanent secretary, Lazaros
Savvides, told the Cyprus Mail that the bill to allow cremation in
Cyprus should be ready for approval by the Council of Ministers in the
first half of this year.

Cypriots were previously prohibited from opting for cremation, while a
2006 Council of Ministers Decision allowed foreign nationals who die on
the island to be cremated ` even though legislation existed on the
establishment of crematoria.

`We have decided to amend the decision and a draft law is being
prepared at present, to give this right to all citizens without
exception, whether they are European, third country or Cypriot
nationals,’ Interior Minister Neoclis Sylikiotis told the state
broadcaster yesterday.

The amendment was deemed necessary to redress the inequality in the
current law that allows foreign nationals residing in Cyprus to be
cremated, but forbids Cypriots from doing so.

`In 2006, a Council of Ministers Decision provided for the creation of
a committee to prepare the legislation on cremating the dead.

`The decision, however, excluded Cypriots from th is right, which was
considered to constitute discrimination,’ Sylikiotis explained.

The legislation will also address practical matters such as the
location and management of crematoria.

`At the same time we are preparing an amendment on how crematoria will
be operated ` either by the state, public or private organisations so
that the cremation and embalmment are carried out in ways that do not
affect the environment or public health.

`Such measures have already been in place for years in other European
countries. In Greece it has been in force since 2008 following a
Presidential Order,’ he said.

Greece was actually a late starter in allowing cremation compared to
other European countries. In France, a 1789 order declared cremation
legal, while an actual law on cremation was passed in 1887. In the UK
cremation has been legal since 1884, in Spain since 1945 and in Germany
since 1934.

Cyprus Church won’t perform funerals for cremated

IN CYPRUS, the Orthodox Church does not recognise cremation as a
religiously acceptable practice, although it agrees that the state has
the right to allow it.

The Interior Ministry had requested the opinion of Archbishop
Chrysostomos II in 2007. In his reply, the archbishop explained that
while the Church recognises the right of its members to choose between
a burial according to church rules or cremation, those who opt for
cremation lose the right to a church funeral service.

The main religious argument against cremation is that the body should
not be destroyed so that it can be resurrected when the day of
resurrection arrives. The Anglican Church, however, disagrees on this
point based on the argument that when people die they receive a new,
spiritual body.

`I would say cremation is an acceptable option, because although the
body is a magnificent gift from God, when we die we receive
resurrection and a new body ` therefore we do not need the old one,’
explained Reverend Michael Crawford, of the Anglican church of South
East Cyprus, which is based in Paralimni.

Reverend Crawford presented the theological grounds for this belief
from an extract of Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians: `42 So also
is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown a perishable body, it is
raised an imperishable body; 43 it is sown in dishonour, it is raised
in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; 44 it is sown
a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural
body, there is also a spiritual body.’

Indicative of the controversial status of cremation, however, is the
fact that church officials in other Cyprus-based churches were unable
to provide an opinion on cremation.

Specifically, the Mail contacted the Armenian Prelacy of Cyprus, and
the Latin Catholic Church in Nicosia and Limassol. Priests and fathers
from these churches, however, were unable to supply the church stance,
answering that they did not know the official position.

Obama marks Turkish atrocity, not genocide

The Age, Australia
April 26 2009

Obama marks Turkish atrocity, not genocide

April 26, 2009

WASHINGTON. President Barack Obama marked the 94th anniversary of the
killings of more than a million Armenians by Ottoman Turks without
describing the violence as genocide, a term US ally Turkey rejects.

Mr Obama recalled "one of the great atrocities of the 20th century" in
a statement on Friday, the annual day of remembrance by Armenians. He
said his personal view of what happened had not changed. Mr Obama said
during his election campaign that the killings constituted genocide.

The President said he strongly supported efforts by Turkey and Armenia
to normalise relations.

The Armenian Government has accused Ottoman Turkey of genocide against
Armenians. The Turkish Government says massacres took place in a kind
of civil war.

BAKU: Russian President Says Encouraging Sides’ Steps To Settle NK C

RUSSIAN PRESIDENT SAYS ENCOURAGING SIDES’ STEPS TO SETTLE NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT

Trend
April 22 2009
Azerbaijan

The steps taken by Armenia and Azerbaijan to resolve the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict are encouraging, the discussions are held
in right direction, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said after
the meeting with Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan, the RIA Novosti
reported.

"We are on the right direction of discussions. My contacts, including
with the Azerbaijani President, have proved that the sides are ready
to take steps in constructive direction to solve the challenge. I
think that these steps are encouraging," Medvedev said.

"Much has been done in this direction recently. I mean the meeting
between the presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia in Moscow on November
2, 2008. A Declaration was signed aftermath of the meeting. This
Declaration is a valuable basis for resolution of the conflict,"
he said.
Content-Type: MESSAGE/RFC822; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-Description:

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: "Katia M. Peltekian" <[email protected]>
Subject: BAKU: Russian President says encouraging sides’ steps to settle NK conflict

Trend, Azerbaijan
April 22 2009

Russian President says encouraging sides’ steps to settle Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
23.04.09 17:22

The steps taken by Armenia and Azerbaijan to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict are encouraging, the discussions are held in right direction, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said after the meeting with Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan, the RIA Novosti reported.

"We are on the right direction of discussions. My contacts, including with the Azerbaijani President, have proved that the sides are ready to take steps in constructive direction to solve the challenge. I think that these steps are encouraging," Medvedev said.

"Much has been done in this direction recently. I mean the meeting between the presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia in Moscow on November 2, 2008. A Declaration was signed aftermath of the meeting. This Declaration is a valuable basis for resolution of the conflict," he said.

Interview: Serj Tankian

INTERVIEW: SERJ TANKIAN
Beatrice Male

Cherwell Online

April 23 2009

Serj Tankian, the multi-million selling Grammy Award-winning musician,
best known for his work with System of a Down, came to Oxford last
Wednesday 22nd April to talk to an issue very close to his heart:
genocide. Screamers is a film that follows the band, all of whom are
descendents of survivors of the Armenian genocide, as they tour and
it points out the horrors of modern genocide that began in Armenia
in 1915 and continue to the present day.

The screening of the film, put on by a partnership of the University’s
Development Office and the Aegis society, gave an opportunity
for students to ask Serj and other panellists Raffy Manoukian –
London-based philanthropist and donor to the University who helped
fund the film – and Professor Theo van Lint – Oxford’s professor of
Armenian Studies and Fellow of Pembroke College – their questions in
a panel discussion. We caught up with Serj before the event:

Have you had much time to see Oxford? I’ve been to Oxford before! We
actually played about an hour away in Reading over the summer and
stayed in Oxford overnight. It was beautiful.

Not spent much time here today then just been travelling? No we’ve just
got here and have been travelling all day. Haven’t had any time to eat-
[eats]

Do you know particularly or have any relationship with the other
two men that are on the panel with you at the talk: Raffy Manoukian
[London-based philanthropist] and Professor Theo van Lint [Calouste
Gulbenkian Professor of Armenian Studies and Fellow of Pembroke
College]?

I Know Raffy really well- I met him because he worked with the BBC
on the production behind Screamers. I met him through that and became
since then and he’s been very very active in promoting awareness about
genocide. In terms of pushing the film as well getting distribution for
it and screenings and working with different non-profit organisations
he’s done a great job. He’s done a lot to be respected.

How did you get involved with making the film?

I was approached by the film maker Carla Garapedian a number of years
ago and she was keen on getting System of a Down involved in making a
film about genocide. So I met with her and I was really interested in
presenting the similarities of different genocide and holocaust because
I see a connection between them all. She was down for that idea which
was cool and I thought that the uniqueness of the experience of the
Armenian genocide in terms of it being denied by the perpetrators
still after 94 years.

Urm, so, we kind of had a meeting of minds and I said OK let me
go back to the other guys from SOAD and see if they are willing to
participate and they were so we, you know, as a band we didn’t do
anything differently than we did on a regular basis: our concerts, our
activism, our meetings with congressional delegates. Everything that
we do we did anyway we would do anyway with or without the film. We
allowed her access so that she could film it and tied that into her
story. So the film is really about genocide but it involves the band.

A lot of your song writing is affected by your politicization- how
did this politicizing come about?

The hypocrisy of the denial of genocide in a well known democracy
was the first spark for my politicization as a young adult and made
me wonder how many truths there are out there that are being denied
for economical or geo-political interests. Since then I’ve found a
lot of others truths or injustices I might say that need shedding of
light. So that was the first trigger for me growing up.

Was your primary motivation for making this film to raise awareness
of the genocide issues surrounding it?

When I first decided to be involved with the film, one of the primary
reasons was to raise awareness of the Armenian genocide another was
to raise awareness of the human disease of this genocide in general. I
think we haven’t realised the importance of prioritizing the reaction
to genocide intervention to genocide as a global society and we still
allow different interests to supersede intervention regarding genocide-
Sudan being a prime example of our times today and how we- when I say
‘we’ I am primarily referring to the western nations and governments-
have not really interfered in a major way.

Like you see Sudan collaborating a number of years back with the CIA
and US intelligence on Al Qaeda authorities within the country because
obviously Bin Laden had spent a quite a bit of time there and it’s
purported that Bin Laden was there after it was known that genocide
was going on- this was after George Bush Jnr. called the atrocities
genocide within Sudan. So you start to think and think OK I guess
for America that meant that fighting terror was more important than
helping victims of genocide and that is a prime example of how our
priorities are misplaced.

Are any of your songs particularly relevant to the issue of genocide?

System of a Down has two songs that touch upon genocide: one is
from the first album we ever made and one is from the last album
that we ever made. The songs are ‘P.L.U.C.K’ and the other ‘The
Holy Mountains’.

Do you think that you could have been part of such a film if you
didn’t have your status as a musician?

I would have wanted to have been part of such a film if I weren’t
a musician- I’m not sure that anyone would be interested in asking
me though!

So, do you consider it important for musicians such as yourself and
Tom Morello to speak out on political issues? Do you think that it
is an important voice?

I think every artist has his or her own vision- I think that it is
important for every artist to follow that vision. I don’t think every
artist should be political. I think that … I’ve always said that
a really great love song is more important than any political song
ever written: it can change the world in much more interesting ways
than any political song. However, that said, I think that music is
a great narration of our times. It’s a great truthsayer of our times.

You listen to Bob Dylan’s music of the sixties and on and you see
that it’s a great way of presenting some truths and a great way
of fighting injustice and power through the arts. So, I think it’s
definitely been part of my vision in life to always, you know, kind of
bring certain topics to the forefront- you know, whether it’s through
music or through conversation. Every artist has their own vision and
I respect that.

Which love songs and political songs do you think are the best ones
for conveying their message?

One of my favourite – I don’t know whether you can call it a love song
– but one of my favourite songs is ‘Yesterday’ by Paul McCartney as
one of those songs that is changing. It is a change oriented type of
song. It makes you think back in time but it also paraphrases life in
such a beautiful way. But there are a lot of beautiful love songs. I
think more sixties- because that’s when a lot of great lovin’ was
going on [laughs]. The Summer of Love and a free and open society. But
there’s a lot of good stuff being written today or quite recently.

Are there any up-and-coming bands or those of the past that are
particularly good at conveying their political message?

There’s a lot more bands touching upon political subjects today than
there were, I would say, six or seven years ago. All I remember
is that right after 9/11, certain parties, myself inclusive, Tom
Morello [Rage Against the Machine] inclusive were questioning some
of the actions that were taken and some of the ‘gung-ho’-ness of the
flag-waving involved. I appreciate authenticity and emotion in any
type of situation but there was a lot of fear-induced flag-waving
going on if that makes sense.

Also reactions that were prevailing: ‘Let’s cut them down’ that kind of
stuff- very illogical type of response which I guess is acceptable for
a tragedy. However, I don’t think that most people understand that the
sources of those tragedies were injustices themselves from elsewhere-
that it stemmed from somewhere and it didn’t just come out of thin
air as a tragedy. It came as a reaction to foreign policy of the US,
Britain and a lot of nations post WW2 and 1 having to do with the
Armenian genocide and other topics. There are a lot of things that
if we go back in history and look at how we’ve interacted as nations
we can see how things are affected by that today.

Last term, there was a motion put to Oxford University Student Union
amounting to a condemnation of the actions in Gaza. This provoked
fierce debate amongst colleges as to whether it was the place of the
student union to put forward a strong opinion on political issues-
do you think that Student Unions should?

Most activism has started in universities. Historically, you look
at the sixties, seventies, eighties, and I think university students
are at a prime age and period of cognisant recognition of the world
around them to be able to stand up for things and still have the
youthful romanticism necessary to not be sceptical enough to actually
put in their time and efforts to do so. I think that it is a very
promising thing.

I don’t like sceptics of activism; we have plenty of it ourselves
in what I do and what Tom Morello does- people saying ‘why should we
listen to you you’re musicians and not foreign policy experts. I say
I’m a human being beyond my particular job description and I happen
to be involved in a number of things that include American foreign
policy and I read a lot about that and I have so for the last 25
years so that doesn’t make me an official expert but I’ll sit down
with an official expert and I’ll have a good repartee, you know?

Is there anything else that you think is particularly important to
say in relation to Oxford students?

I went to university myself – I didn’t go to Oxford [laughs] but I
went to Southern California University. It was a time of growth of the
mind. I personally don’t think that you learn anything constructive in
University. I think what you learn in University is to allow yourself
to learn. I think that that’s what you learn. You learn to be open
to things and to allow things to enter your mind without critically
cutting it down and that openness to learning. You’ll retain some
of the knowledge obviously but I think the average is about fifteen
percent if at all. I certainly don’t remember anything that I learnt
from my business degree in college except maybe a few quotes or
something like that from funny professors if anything.

But I think it’s important, though, to have the community where you’re
able to communicate with other people about things happening not just
domestically but around the world and having like I said the lack of
scepticism to be involved in standing up for what you truly believe in.

http://www.cherwell.org/content/8659

"Echo Moskvy" Launches An Anti-Armenian Campaign

"ECHO MOSKVY" LAUNCHES AN ANTI-ARMENIAN CAMPAIGN

PanArmenian News
April 23 2009
Armenia

"Echo Mpskvy" Russian radio station yesterday dedicated the one of
its broadcasts to Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan. The campaign
launched last evening by Alexander Boudberg, was full of all kinds
of old and new labels, explicit hints and blunt demagogy.

The insolent provocative tone of the program was not something new. The
allegations on Shoushi being the "Azerbaijan’s ancient capital", the
hints on the Armenian President’s biography being similar to that
of African dictators, the tragic moment of praying to God during
the Khodjalu massacres (organized with the active involvement of
the Russian troops), allusions to former Armenia premier Andranik
Margaryan’s death unmasked the "well-informed" Editor-in-Chief of
the broadcast and revealed the true image of the first-class radio
station declaring its (and not only its) political preferences in an
open and explicit manner.

Nargiz Asadova’s statements on the conflict being a special
operation launched by Russian special services, Andrey Yakovlev
and Benediktov’s statement on Moscow’s intention to use pressures
against the RA President for the country’s possible participation
in the NATO trainings in Georgia almost became a specific kind of
know-how. Alexander Boudberg again started provocative statement,
considering President Sargsyabn’s upcoming visit extremely difficult
and stressing the importance of Russia’s strategic partnership with
Azerbaijan.

The investigation into the RA President’s personal life ended with
Nikolay Toyitskiy’s malicious statements expressing strong concerns to
spoil his Russian by pronouncing the awkward surname. He was all the
time sticking to the Communist past of the second and third Armenian
Presidents (forgetting about Heydar Aliev’s biography).

Such propaganda is intended to convince the public that Azerbaijan,
a country rich in energy resources and other reserves, will be a
better strategic partner compared to Armenia. But there’s one our
Russian colleagues forget: the establishment of closer ties with Baku
cannot bear a momentary and "instrumental" character for Azerbaijan
seeking to achieve the settlement of the Karabakh conflict the way
it desires. And it’s quite possible that those who

101 Congressmen Have Already Expressed Support To Resolution On Arme

101 CONGRESSMEN HAVE ALREADY EXPRESSED SUPPORT TO RESOLUTION ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE IN U.S. CONGRESS

NOYAN TAPAN
APRIL 23, 2009
YEREVAN

101 Congressmen have already expressed support to the Resolution on
Armenian Genocide in U.S. Congress. Arpi Vardanian, the Director of
the Armenian Assembly of America (AAA) Armenian Office, reported at
the April 23 press conference. She expects U.S. President Barack Obama
to keep his preelection promise and to pronounce the word "genocide"
in his April 24 address.

According to A. Vardanian, recognition of the Armenian Genocide is
necessary for restoring the history of not only Turkey, but also the
U.S. "I wish the U.S. to recognize its own history admitting that
in those years it provided much assistance to people experiencing
the Genocide."

A. Vardanian said that they are for establishment of relations between
Armenia and Turkey and opening the border. She welcomed the joint
statement of RA and Turkish Foreign Ministers meanwhile refraining
from expressing an opinion about the "road map" mentioned in that
statement due to not being well-aware of the details.