Series Of Events Dedicated To The Armenian Genocide

SERIES OF EVENTS DEDICATED TO THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

ArmRadio.am
21.03.2007 16:38

During 2007-2008 the Armenian Diaspora Research Center will organize
a number of events in France dedicated to the 1915 Armenian Genocide,
founder and president of the Center Jean-Clod Kebajyan told ArmInfo.

He informed that the Center has already provided archive materials
for an exhibition in Monmartry Museum to be held in a month. It will
be devoted to the Armenian movement organized by famous poet Arshak
Chobanyan after the Armenian massacres of 1894 in Sasun.

In Jean-Clod Kebajyan’s words, such events are welcomed not only by
Armenians but also the French.

There Are Five Main Reasons Why The Bush Administration Doesn’t Want

THERE ARE FIVE MAIN REASONS WHY THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION DOESN’T WANT CONGRESS TO ENDORSE THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION: ZAMAN

Arminfo
2007-03-21 23:02:00

There are five main reasons why the Bush administration doesn’t want
Congress to endorse the Armenian genocide resolution, says Zaman
(Turkey) in its article Why Does White House Oppose the Armenian Bill?

1) History: Accepting the resolution and further recognition of the
tragedy the ethnic Armenians experienced during the Ottoman period
would harm American efforts to bring its relationship with Turkey to
the next level. 2) Yerevan: Identical letters from Condoleezza Rice
and Robert Gates noted that endorsement of the resolution would
complicate the aim of normalizing the situation between Ankara
and Yerevan. 3) Congregation: Two months have passed since Hrant
Dink’s murder. The slow advance of the investigation into the case
and the increasing anxiety among Armenians is a reason for worries
in America. 4) Nationalism: Official congressional records show
the Bush’s administration believes that Turkey is going through an
"identity crisis" and that "some new nationalism has turned into
joint components of Turkey’s political spectrum." 5) Cooperation:
It is felt that if the resolution were to be endorsed, Ankara could
limit its cooperation with Washington.

Open Society Is Open To Everyone

OPEN SOCIETY IS OPEN TO EVERYONE
Lusine Musaelyan

KarabakhOpen
20-03-2007 16:31:41

The Open Society NGO was set up in 2005. The coordinator of the
organization Naira Hayrumyan says the goal of the NGO is contained in
the name of the society – to promote an open society. Naira Hayrumyan
thinks in Karabakh the society is not open in two aspects. "The first
is the internal political aspect.

Usually we do not discuss the problems publicly which concern the
public, although this is what democracy implies. Decisions are made,
it is not important if they are good or bad decisions, which are not
discussed with people. We would like to fill in this gap. The second
is the foreign political aspect.

As an information unit, Karabakh is closed to many. The world has very
vague idea of what Karabakh is, and continues to think that the people
who live here are fighting all the time." Naira Hayrumyan says Open
Society works towards both directions. "As to the foreign situation, we
conduct public polls on urgent topics and discuss them in round-table
meetings and electronic forums," said Naira Hayrumyan. She underlined
the debate over the Karabakh settlement organized by the NGO after
the release of the reports of the International Crisis Group. "We
conducted a poll, large-scale debates on the reports and conveyed
the opinion of the Karabakh society to the international community
on the proposals of the mediators," Naira Hayrumyan said. "In order
to open Karabakh for the world information sphere our organization
set up the website with the help of which we
present Karabakh to the world the way it is in reality," said the
coordinator of the organization.

In answer to the question how the organization is sustained, Naira
Hayrumyan said: "We do not think that public activities require
immense funds.

Moreover, the members of the organization are people who are ready
to work without pay, they follow their principles. As to financing,
last year KarabakhOpen and a few other non-governmental media got
government assistance, which was spent on the English version of
the website. I hope this year government assistance will continue,
otherwise we will have to close the English version.

We got a small grant from the International Alert to set up the column
Third Sector in the framework of the Resource Center of Stepanakert.

We do the rest of the work on a voluntary basis," According to Naira
Hayrumyan, the members of the organization are mainly related to
journalism. Although the Open Society is open to everyone.

www.karabakhopen.com

In Darfur, ‘Never again’ means again

CT_liotta18_03-18-07_HA4R2LF.1e842c4.html

Provide nce Journal

In Darfur, ‘Never again’ means again

01:00 AM EDT on Sunday, March 18, 2007

P. H. Liotta

EIGHTY-FIVE YEARS AGO, the poet T. S. Eliot began his masterpiece "The
Waste Land" with the line that "April is the cruellest month." Although
Eliot was writing about madness – including the madness that was the
First World War – his lines resonate today for very different reasons.

Specifically, as we approach yet another April we might do well to
remember that, aside from being National Poetry Month, April is also the

month when some of the most extreme cases of genocide took place in the
last century. Thirteen years ago, beginning in April in the African
nation of Rwanda, 800,000 people died in the course of 100 days. Many
who died were cut down by people they knew, neighbors and sometimes even

former friends. During those 100 days, the United States stood by as the

slaughter unfolded. The United Nations, meanwhile, proved diplomatically

hobbled and failed to mandate effective intervention by U.N.
peacekeepers in Rwanda.

Eighty-two years ago, countless numbers died following the April arrest,

and subsequent deportation and murder, of Armenian intellectuals during
the last days of the Ottoman Empire. Even today, in reference to these
events, the word "genocide" is never used in Turkey. During a February
2005 interview, for example, Nobel Laureate Orhan Pamuk stated that
"Thirty thousand Kurds and a million Armenians were killed in these
lands and nobody but me dares to talk about it." In a subsequent BBC
article he was quoted as saying, "What happened to the Ottoman Armenians

in 1915 was a major thing that was hidden from the Turkish nation; it
was a taboo. But we have to be able to talk about the past." As a result

of these statements, charges were brought against Pamuk for "insulting
Turkishness." These charges were eventually dropped, but the sting of
speaking of forbidden topics remains.

When genocidal events took place in the 20th Century – the Holocaust,
the killing fields of Cambodia, the al-Anfal campaign against the Kurds
in Iraq, the brutal disintegration of Yugoslavia – major powers stood by

as thousands, and sometimes millions, died. Powerful states often took
the frail excuse that intervention in such events was not in the
"national interest." While failing to militarily intervene, these same
powerful states also failed to exert effective political, diplomatic, or
economic pressure on offending parties; when states did act,
unfortunately, it was often too little, too late – and safer.

In every case of horrendous human-rights atrocities in recent history,
state leaders and the international community have loudly proclaimed in
the aftermath, "Never Again" – never again should such abuses be allowed
to take place without the world taking action.

Yet another genocide is taking place in the world today: in the Darfur
region of western Sudan. Since the campaign of state-sponsored violence
began, hundreds of thousands have died and 2½ million people have been
displaced. An undermanned and under-resourced African Union peacekeeping
force has faced immense challenges in Darfur, waiting for an already
authorized U.N. force to deploy. Humanitarian aid is frequently
obstructed as famine drives mortality rates to frighteningly high
levels. Violence against the people of Darfur includes gang-rapes,
torture, and executions where children have been beheaded or thrown
alive into fires and tossed down wells.

Some advocates speak openly today of "human security," wherein
individual citizens be accorded sovereign rights and privileges in the
same manner that states have been accorded sovereignty since the
Westphalian system took hold centuries ago. Human security is about
protecting people; equally, human security provides peoples the
opportunities for progress – through education, disease reduction, clean

water, and livable communities. In short, human security is the
cornerstone and the building block for stability, security, and
sustainability.

The classically Western argument that democracies protect, promote, and
enforce human rights is sorely tried when conflicts such as genocide
take place in our globalized, interconnected, and often interdependent
lives. When powerful states, such as the United States, fail to act in
any meaningful way when gross human atrocities take place, Americans
undermine their very legitimacy as a global leaders.

It is now approaching three years since former Secretary of State Colin
Powell declared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that
events in Darfur amounted to genocide. Since then, little actual
movement to change the course of events has taken place. Yet necessary
action does not entail just military intervention or peace enforcement.
(While it is true that 5,000 peacekeepers could have stopped the
genocide in 1994 in Rwanda, a country the size of Maryland, military
forces alone cannot compel a better outcome today in Darfur, which is
the size of California.) States must also leverage political,
diplomatic, and economic power.

The good news is that individual citizens can, and do, make a
difference. Student-led groups such as STAND (an anti-genocide
coalition) and the Genocide Intervention Network, and faith-based,
humanitarian, and human- rights organizations such as "Save Darfur,"
have worked doggedly to generate attention and pass on knowledge. Simple

acts such as writing letters and calling a congressman can help change
the way things are.

In the aftermath of the Rwandan genocide, some White House officials in
the Clinton administration commented that they did not hear from the
American public. The voice of outrage today, however, is louder.
Political leaders need to choose to hear that voice.

It is time we remember what happened in Rwanda – and what is still
happening today in Africa and elsewhere. Perhaps it is also time that we
be honest with ourselves as to why powerful states and international
entities always fail to act when the time comes for action. Until we do,

"Never Again" will mean only "Again and Again."

P. H. Liotta, an occasional contributor, is executive director of the
Pell Center for International Relations and Public Policy at Salve
Regina University. Those interested in attending the public screening of
the film Darfur Diaries on March 25 at the Jane Pickens Theater, in
Newport, should contact the Pell Center at (401) 341-2927 or
[email protected], as seating is limited.

http://www.projo.com/opinion/contributors/content/

NKR Government Allocated 700mln AMD For The Realization Of A Mortgag

NKR GOVERNMENT ALLOCATED 700MLN AMD FOR THE REALIZATION OF A MORTGAGE CREDITING PROGRAM

Mediamax Agency, Armenia
March 19 2007

Yerevan, March 19 /Mediamax/. 700mln AMD is allocated from the state
budget of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR) for the realization of
a mortgage crediting program.

Mediamax reports that the NKR Prime Minister Anushavan Danielian said
this, answering the questions of the visitors of the "Azat Artsakh"
newspaper’s website. He noted that the possibility to improve the
housing conditions will be given not only to young families, but also
the citizens, which will be chosen by the expert commission.

"The Nagorno-Karabakh Republic is the only country in the region,
which, at the expense of the state budget, took up the realization
of a mortgage crediting program on preferential terms – by a 6%
annual interest rate and up to 20 years time to run", Anushavan
Danielian stated.

The NKR government is also working out a social mortgage program,
the realization of which is planned to start in 2008.

Projet de DC d’installer un radar dans le Caucase inquiete l’Armenie

Le Monde, France
18 mars 2007 dimanche

Le projet de Washington d’installer un radar dans le Caucase inquiète
l’Arménie

par Christophe Chtelot

LA PROPOSITION américaine d’installer dans le Caucase un radar de son
bouclier antimissile n’est pas sans inquiéter l’Arménie. Le projet de
l’agence américaine de défense antimissile ne précise pas vers quel
pays caucasien se porterait son choix. Ni quand. Mais ce ne sera
sûrement pas dans ce petit pays enclavé, voisin de l’Iran et de la
Géorgie et également frontalier de l’Azerbaïdjan et de la Turquie,
avec lesquels Erevan n’entretient plus de relations diplomatiques.

Autant dire qu’" il n’est pas dans notre intérêt de créer de
nouvelles lignes de divisions dans une région instable ", explique au
Monde Serge Sarkissian, ministre de la défense de l’Arménie, lors
d’une visite à Paris, mardi 13 et mercredi 14 mars. " Nous n’avons
d’ailleurs pas reçu de proposition américaine ", ajoute le ministre.

Si cette ancienne république soviétique entend pourtant préserver ses
relations avec Washington, on y est surtout très sensible à ne pas
froisser l’allié – et fournisseur énergétique – russe. Et Moscou a
très tôt fait savoir sa ferme opposition au projet américain
d’agrandissement de son bouclier avec l’installation d’éléments de
défense en République tchèque et en Pologne.

Sceptique sur l’avenir de la proposition américaine pour le Caucase,
le ministre arménien explique toutefois que " le niveau de
compréhension et de consultation " entre les deux puissances sera
déterminant. Et, dans ce jeu, l’Arménie sait qu’elle ne pèse pas
lourd, même si M. Sarkissian défend une " politique d’équilibre "
faite de " collaboration avec l’OTAN tout en approfondissant – les –
relations avec la Russie ".

EQUILIBRISME DIPLOMATIQUE

Un autre élément complique le numéro d’équilibrisme diplomatique
arménien : les relations privilégiées qu’Erevan entretient depuis
longtemps avec Téhéran. Or le bouclier antimissile servirait à
protéger les Etats-Unis contre une attaque de missiles balistiques de
longue portée tirés par ce que Washington définit comme des "
Etats-voyous ", parmi lesquels figure en bonne place l’Iran,
partenaire économique essentiel pour une Arménie dénuée de ressources
énergétiques.

Poussée à son paroxysme, la politique américaine d’endiguement de
l’Iran pourrait avoir des conséquences dramatiques pour l’Arménie.
Mais on en est encore loin. La construction du gazoduc
irano-arménien, dont la première section devrait être inaugurée
prochainement, n’est d’ailleurs pas remise en question. En revanche,
la finalisation des travaux de ce projet, censé abaisser le degré de
dépendance énergétique de l’Arménie vis-à-vis de la Russie, se fera "
probablement avec des capitaux russes ", reconnaît M. Sarkissian,
également coprésident de la commission gouvernementale arméno-russe.

The Hague: State Secretary Albayrak May Be Prosecuted In Turkey

NIS News Bulletin, Netherlands
March 16 2007

State Secretary Albayrak May Be Prosecuted In Turkey

THE HAGUE, 17/03/07 – Justice State Secretary Nebahat Albayrak may be
prosecuted in Turkey. A Turkish lawyer, Kemal Kerincsiz, wants to sue
her for insulting the Turkish identity.

Kerincsiz brought a case earlier against writer Orhan Pamuk and
journalist Hrant Dink, who was assassinated in January. In the case
of Dink, the case led to a conviction. An Istanbul court dropped the
case against Pamuk under international pressure.

As a Labour (PvdA) MP, Albayrak supported a motion in 2004 in which
the Lower House unanimously called on the Dutch government to press
for international recognition of the Armenian genocide. In Turkey, it
is forbidden to say that the Turkish regime massacred hundreds of
thousands of Armenians around 1915.

Kerincsiz said on TV programme Een Vandaag that Albayrak committed
treason against the Turkish state by supporting the motion. He
threatened to have her prosecuted for this. Albayrak in fact watered
down her views in 2006 by stating that it was not up to her but to
scientists and lawyers to judge whether genocide can technically be
spoken of.

Albayrak said via her spokesman she would wait and see whether a
complaint will actually follow. As well as Dutch nationality, she has
a Turkish passport. Party for Freedom (PVV) MP Geert Wilders has in
recent weeks cast doubts on her loyalty because she is also subject
to Turkish law. A Lower House majority considered this nonsense.

On Friday, Wilders requested clarification by the government about
the case Kerinsciz threatens to bring. If he does, Premier Jan Peter
Balkenende will have to press Albayrak to give up her Turkish
nationality after all or resign as state secretary, Wilders said in
written questions to the premier.

Home Affairs Minister Guusje ter Horst had repeated Thursday evening
that she considers the debate on dual nationality a "non-issue".
During a meeting in Amersfoort on cultural diversity within the
police, she said Turkish and Moroccan officers are just as loyal as
others. "We do not count passports, we count quality." Ter Horst
presented the 2007 Diversity Prize to the Amsterdam police corps.

Pan-national resource needed to meet demographic challenges

Pan-national resource needed to meet demographic challenges

17-03-2007 13:53:44 – KarabakhOpen

`The demographic state in Karabakh is normal but there are more
challenges to meet. We have a number of programs, for the territory
of the second Armenian state allows having a bigger population,’ said
Member of Parliament Karen Grigoryan elected from the region of
Kashatagh.

The member of parliament thinks in order to level the demographic
situation in both Armenian states a pan-national strategy of use of
the financial and other resources of the Diaspora is needed. It is
necessary to restore the economy, the infrastructures, and here we
need unity in all, he said.

U.S. government doesn’t respect moral aspect Armenian Genocide issue

PanARMENIAN.Net

U.S. government doesn’t respect moral aspect Armenian Genocide issue
16.03.2007 14:49 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian National Committee of America Executive
Director Aram Hamparian commented on the statement issued by the
U.S. embassy in Yerevan. Hamparian reiterated that
Ambassador-designate Richard Hoagland has denied the Armenian
Genocide.

`He has replied in writing to Senators Kerry and Boxer that there was
no genocide and has questioned the Armenian killings in the Ottoman
Empire. Secondly, if you wish to understand the position of the U.S.
government, you have to clearly understand the position on this issue
crucial to Armenians.

They can play with words, but what matters to us is the
legislation. It is very sad that the U.S. government does not respect
the moral aspect of the issue. In this respect, the US foreign
relations department lags behind the U.S. Congress, the American
society, the American media and the states. We call on the American
authorities to recognize the Armenian Genocide but the Administration
continues to defend the Turkish interest.

Both in Yerevan and Washington, representatives of the U.S. government
know that the policy conducted in this field is not fair, and that
policy is more pro-Turkish and pro-American,’ Aram Hamparian said. He
conveyed hope that everybody in the U.S. embassy in Yerevan talks
about Armenian Genocide as sincerely and bravely as John Evans did.

Situation in USA around mineral water Jermuk needs specification

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
March 16 2007

SITUATION IN USA AROUND MINERAL WATER "JERMUK" NEEDS SPECIFICATION

YEREVAN, March 15. /ARKA/. The situation in the USA around mineral
water "Jermuk" needs specification, said RA Deputy Foreign Minister
Arman Kirakosyan, commenting on the prohibition of selling the
mineral water in the USA.
"It is necessary to specify why in the USA there is such a situation
with "Jermuk" after seven years since it has been exported in 2000,"
Kirakosyan said.
"Perhaps only one specific consignment of the mineral water was of
different quality, however, it needs concretization," said
Kirakosyan. He pointed out that reporters should have an essential
role in this issue.
Several days ago the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the United
States Department warned the American consumers that the mineral
water "Jermuk" is dangerous for health. The widespread statement said
that, in particular, "during several days the use of arsenic can
affect kidneys, liver, skin, cardiovascular system, and its
continuous usage may lead to cancer and death." After the USA, Canada
and Hong Kong also prohibited the "Jermuk" sale.
The RA Minister of Agriculture and "Jermuk" producers treat it an
unfair competition aiming to withdraw the Armenian mineral water from
the American market. L.M. -0–