2008 Budget Reaches National Assembly

2008 BUDGET REACHES NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

Panorama.am
17:33 04/10/2007

The National Assembly has already received the proposed budget figures
for 2008 at their unscheduled meeting on Monday. Discussions will
continue until November, but from October 29 the permanent committee on
finance and budgeting will meet regularly to study the budget outline.

The budget for 2008 has been finalized. Planned is 744.7 million dram
of income and 820.8 of expenses, with a deficit of 76 billion dram. A
raise in minimum wages is foreseen, by 5,000 dram, up to 25 thousand
dram. Also foreseen is a raise of wages for doctors and teachers,
city workers, diplomatic workers, all by an average of 60 per cent.

European Parliament Follows Pro-Turkish Policy

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FOLLOWS PRO-TURKISH POLICY

PanARMENIAN.Net
04.10.2007 16:49 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The European Armenian Federation (EAFJD) states
that the European Parliament is following a pro-Turkish policy,
the EAFJD chairperson, Hilda Tchoboian told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter.

"The European Parliament Foreign Relations Committee did not pass
the resolution on the EU-Turkey relations. Calls to recognize the
Armenian Genocide and put an end to the policy of denial don’t find
understanding among European parliamentarians. The topic was not
discussed at the October 3 session.

Actually, the reports prepared by Ria Oomen-Ruijten was not
amended. The final voting will be held October 24. We are planning
to issue objections to the resolution. The EAFJD will sit October
15-16 to work out a statement referring both to Hay Dat and Armenia’s
foreign policy.

As reported earlier, European Parliament deputies proposed
236 amendments aimed at improving the draft resolution on the
EU-Turkey Relations. The draft text of this document, prepared by
Mrs. Oomen-Ruijten (Christian-democrats, Netherlands), came under
criticism – including within her own political party, the EPP –
because of its laconic wording that evaded most of the key issues:
the sociocultural rights of Kurds, the occupation of Cyprus, the
EU’s absorption capacity and the enduring racist forces in the upper
echelons of the Turkish government

BAKU: Mger Mikaelyan: Azeri Team’s Balls Did Not Pass Thorough The G

MGER MIKAELYAN: AZERI TEAM’S BALLS DID NOT PASS THOROUGH THE GATES

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Oct 4 2007

"We got prepared for the match against Azerbaijan very seriously. We
paid much attention to the psychological training. Armenian sportsmen
were well aware of the importance and principality of the match",
Armenian national women team (U-19) head coach Mger Mikaelyan was
quoted as saying.

Armenian head coach was pleased with draw result against Azerbaijan
team.

"Azerbaijan has a very skilled team. As far as I know they have two
Russian footballers. I can say that we had not so much time to hold
training. Despite this our team played well".

Armenian coach doubted the goals of Azeri team. "Azerbaijan team
was winning the match 2-0 in the first half. They also had chance to
score penalty. But our keeper Anna Karapetyan disappointed them.

Moreover, I doubt that two goals of Azeri team".

Mikaelyan explained the failure in the match Armenia 0-13 Scotland
with lack of experience.

Is Azerbaijan Trying To Present Karabakh As A Terrorist Organization

IS AZERBAIJAN TRYING TO PRESENT KARABAKH AS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION?

Karabakh Open
Oct 3 2007

"Azerbaijan is trying to present Karabakh as a terrorist organization,
even though after the declaration of independence our country has
been following the track for state building and creation of its
own system of defense," said Member of Parliament Vahram Atanesyan,
chair of the Committee of External Relations, in a news conference
on October 2. "In addition, Azerbaijan is likely to destroy Karabakh
as a hotbed of terrorism," he said.

He said waging a war against Karabakh will mean recognition of NKR,
and "in order to avoid this legal trap, Azerbaijan decided to use
the term "antiterrorist effort"."

"Azerbaijan’s intention, which was voiced by the minister of defense
and endorsed by the political parties, is part of the Azerbaijani
military doctrine which has been drafted and proposed to the
parliament. Azerbaijan will adopt the doctrine which involves an
aggressive approach against NKR and Armenia," the member of parliament
said. Vahram Atanesyan thinks Karabakh should draw the attention of
the international community to this aggressive military doctrine and
emphasize that this political document bears hostility toward NKR
aspiring for independence.

"Certainly, it is not an innovation for the Azerbaijani policies.

However, it should be noted that by imitating negotiations mediated
by the OSCE Minsk Group, Azerbaijan is all the time pursuing the
goal of solving the problem of Karabakh through military ways,"
Vahram Atanesyan said.

"Baku is trying to make the international community believe that
there are terrorist organizations in NKR which impede the peace
settlement of the Karabakh conflict. However, the international
community should make sure that there have never been terrorists in
NKR, and the security of NKR is guaranteed by the Defense Army, which
is under the political control of the elective government. Moreover,
during the Karabakh-Azerbaijani conflict Baku resorted to international
terrorists and mercenaries, which is condemned by the international
community," Vahram Atanesyan said.

The member of parliament listed the names of POWs captured
by the Karabakh side: Atillah Gumac (Turkey), Gennady Kutikov,
Yuri Velichenko, Alexey Suslo, Bakhtiar Baberdjani (Afghanistan),
and others.

"Considering that the mercenaries usually do not surrender, we may
judge about the number of mercenaries in the Azerbaijani army.

According to the Afghan POW, about 2500 Afghan mojahedeen served in
the Azerbaijani army, each got 5000 dollars a month. In addition, the
Afghans also supplied narcotics to Azerbaijani soldiers. According to
the NKR government agencies, Rovshan Djavadov, the minister of internal
affairs of Azerbaijan there, hired mercenaries, who also plotted the
attempt against President Aliyev. As to Chechen insurgents fighting
against Karabakh, even the Azerbaijani media wrote about them,"
the member of parliament said.

The war cannot start tomorrow but we should mind that the targets
are clearly outlined in the Azerbaijani military doctrine, and "at
the same time an anti-terrorist propaganda has been launched." The
member of parliament said Karabakh must work out its doctrine of
national security.

Tigran Torosyan: "Mark Given To Activities Of Current Authorities By

TIGRAN TOROSIAN: "MARK GIVEN TO ACTIVITIES OF CURRENT AUTHORITIES BY RA FIRST PRESIDENT DID NOT DIFFER FROM WHAT SOUNDED BEFORE"
Author: Meliqian Gayane
Editor: Eghian Robert

Noyan Tapan News Agency, Armenia
Oct 3 2007

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 3, NOYAN TAPAN. The most important part of the
recent speech made by Levon Ter-Petrosian, the first President of
the Republic of Armenia, was not the mark given to the activities of
the current authorities, as it did not differ at all from the various
marks sounded up to now in that respect. This opinion was expressed
by Tigran Torosian, the Speaker of the RA National Assembly and the
Deputy Chairman of the Republican Party of Armenia.

"It is quite another thing that the first RA President said that all
the problems set in front of Armenia are connected with the settlement
of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, but he also said in a distinct way
that he cannot offer any solution with regard to this problem, that
is to say, it is the same situation as was in autumn 1997 or at the
beginning of 1998," Tigran Torosian said. According to him, this is
the most important extract of the speech of Levon Ter-Petrosian and
the most important statement of a question in terms of the problems
of Armenia.

The NA Speaker also stressed that "the ominous provisions that sounded
in 1998, according to which Armenia would appear in a blocade in
1-2 years all in all, economy would pull down, we would lose Nagorno
Karabakh, to name but a few," did not come true during these years in
connection with the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. In
the conviction of Tigran Torosian, in contrast to those provisions,
a qualitative difference has been recorded in the conflict settlement
process: the international community and the co-Chairmen of the
OSCE Minsk Group have mentioned for many times that the problem
will be regulated within the frameworks of not only the principle of
territorial completeness, but also the right of self-determination
of nations.

Breaking News: Armenian Genocide Resolution (H.Res.106) To Be Consid

BREAKING NEWS: ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION (H.RES.106) TO BE CONSIDERED BY KEY COMMITTEE ON OCTOBER 10TH

DeFacto Agency, Armenia
Oct 2 2007

The House Foreign Affairs Committee is set to mark up the Armenian
Genocide Resolution (H.Res.106) on Wednesday, October 10th, reported
the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA.) Committee discussion
and adoption of the resolution will set the stage for subsequent full
House consideration of the key human rights measure.

Armenian American activists are encouraged to voice their
support for the Armenian Genocide resolution by participating
in the ongoing ANCA Congressional Call-In Campaign by visiting:
t?alertid=10340906&type=TA
The Committee discussion and vote will be webcast live at
v=close. The specific
time of the Committee meeting is yet to be announced.

To remind, introduced on January 30th by Rep. Adam Schiff along with
Representative George Radanovich (R-CA), Congressional Armenian
Caucus Co-Chairs Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Joe Knollenberg (R-MI),
Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) and Rep. Thaddeus
McCotter (R-MI), the Armenian Genocide resolution calls upon the
President to ensure that the foreign policy of the United States
reflects appropriate understanding and sensitivity concerning issues
related to human rights, ethnic cleansing, and genocide documented
in the United States record relating to the Armenian Genocide. The
resolution is cosponsored by 226 Members of Congress from 39 states.

A similar resolution in the Senate (S.Res.106), introduced by
Assistant Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Sen. John Ensign
(R-NV) currently has 31 cosponsors, including Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid (D-NV) and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton (D-NY).

Over the past nine months, Armenian Americans and human rights
advocates have joined with Members of Congress in educating their
colleagues about the Armenian Genocide and the importance of proper
recognition of this crime against humanity. The ANCA has mounted
several national grassroots initiatives including the highly successful
"Click for Justice" and "Call for Justice" campaigns as well as the
"End the Cycle of Genocide" Advocacy Days, cosponsored with the
Genocide Intervention Network.

The Armenian Genocide resolution is supported by a broad-based
coalition of over 50 human rights, religious, civic, and ethnic
organizations, including the (in alphabetical order): American
Federation of Jews from Central Europe (New York, NY), Bulgarian
Institute for Research and Analysis (Bethesda, MD), Center for Russian
Jewry with Student Struggle for Soviet Jewry (New York, NY), Washington
Chapter Czechoslovak National Council of America (Washington, DC), etc.

http://capwiz.com/anca/callalert/index.t
http://foreignaffairs.house.gov/index.asp?subna

Perhaps It Is First President’s Message To West

PERHAPS IT IS FIRST PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE TO WEST

Lragir, Armenia
Oct 2 2007

The leader of the Christian Democratic Party Khosrov Harutiunyan
stated on October 2 at the Hayatsk club the ex-president’s address on
September 21 was rather a message to the west. Khosrov Harutiunyan
thinks Levon Ter-Petrosyan is thereby trying to offset the lack of
resource for running in the presidential election. Khosrov Harutiunyan
means the lack of the public and political resource of the first
president.

"At the moment Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s political resource is meager.

His public resource is as meager. And by the way, it is objective. If
you walk about the city, meet citizens, many think if Ter-Petrosyan
were to speak up, he should have first of all said why he stumbled
many years ago to continue, which he failed to do. By the way,
we should be frank that usually expectations from the strong, the
major, the powerful are greater. The first president of Armenia has
his peculiar role in the history of independent Armenia with its
achievements, victories and also failures. And if today the attitude
of the society is meant, I assure you that many were waiting for
Ter-Petrosyan’s self-criticism, if I may say so, whether he took
his time to assess for himself what he succeeded and what he failed,
and whether the reasons were objective or subjective. Unfortunately,
the society has heard nothing so far," Khosrov Harutiunyan says.

He says it reduces Ter-Petrosyan’s resource, which he is trying to
offset with a message to the foreign organizations. "I may be mistaken
but it is a supposition which I can make," Khosrov Harutiunyan says. He
says it is not accidental that the first president’s speech was
based on the two problems which Armenia committed to solve before the
international organizations: the settlement of the Karabakh conflict
and battle against corruption. In addition, Khosrov Harutiunyan says
corruption, misconduct existed in the early 90s as well. Khosrov
Harutiunyan says the society’s current disappointment also stems from
the years of government of the All-Armenian Movement. "Many yielded
to the temptation of power. We witnessed a state inside the state,
the domineering role of the person, use of public administration
for their own, including non-political purposes. In other words,
corruption, protectionism, defiance of the law, is not the epidemic
of the past 5 or 6 years," Khosrov Harutiunyan says.

He says it allows thinking that Ter-Petrosyan hopes to get the support
of the international organizations to boost his resource.

However, Khosrov Harutiunyan discerns other reasons for concern. He
says since Ter-Petrosyan’s speech sparked passions rather than made
think, there is concern that the benchmark of the political struggle
in Armenia may drop low, and a confrontation may occur like in the
presidential election in 1996. Khosrov Harutiunyan says expectations
from the West may create conditions for a revolution in Armenia which
Armenia does not need.

Tales From The ‘Black Garden’

TALES FROM THE ‘BLACK GARDEN’
By Stephanie Holmes

BBC News, UK
Sept 28 2007

The lives of thousands of young Azeris and Armenians have been scarred
by the bitter conflict over a mountainous region whose name means
"Black Garden".

Some 30,000 people were killed during the war over Nagorno-Karabakh
in the early 1990s, and little progress towards peace has been made
since a 1994 ceasefire.

The struggle for the mainly Armenian-populated region of Azerbaijan
remains unresolved, and hundreds of thousands of people are waiting
to return to their former homes.

For nearly 20 years Azeris and Karabakh Armenians have had no contact
with one another.

But a group of young journalists from both sides, who grew up during
the war, are now taking part in a project that brings them together
to make short documentary films.

They explore the impact of war on the two communities and the
absurdities of daily life under the conditions of frozen conflict.

Massive expulsions

The shared background for all the film-makers is what Laurence
Broers, an expert on the South Caucasus with conflict resolution group
Conciliation Resources, describes as the "massive mutual expulsions"
caused by the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

One million Azeris were driven out of Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding
regions by Armenian forces, or fled homes in Armenia.

Some 400,000 Armenians were also displaced from Azerbaijan or the
border regions of Armenia.

Twenty-year-old Suzanna Seyranyana, a Karabakh foreign language
student, was apprehensive about meeting Azeris through the project.

"Before, I thought that the Azeris were our enemies, I never thought
I’d be able to sit down with them, to have a cup of tea and a chat,
but during the project I met Azeris for the first time and they’ve
become my friends. I didn’t feel any barriers between us," she said.

A dream

"I realised that it is not our fault," she continued. "People aren’t
guilty – neither Azeris nor Armenians. It was war. It feels like a
dream, sitting with them, talking to them."

The films were made in the richly fertile mountainous region. Photo:
Conciliation Resources

Yet there is reluctance, by both Armenians and Azeris to remember,
recount and relive their experiences of childhood.

"I was five years old when the war broke out. I saw everything. I lived
in a shelter for about two years. There was no light, no nothing. It
was awful. I don’t want to remember that period," Suzanna said,
speaking quietly.

Vafa Farajova, a bright-eyed 31-year-old Azeri teacher and journalist
explained: "We have forgotten our childhood and school-years."

But she still has vivid memories of abandoning her home in Zangelan,
one of seven districts surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh occupied by
Armenian forces during the conflict.

"When we fled, all the routes to Baku were closed, all the districts
were occupied by Armenians so we had to escape across the river,
via Iran," she said.

"We left everything – our home, everything… We didn’t take my
clothes, my pictures, my dresses or shoes. I felt awful, I cried. I
kept asking God ‘Why? Why?’ Armenians and Azerbaijanis had had
such good relations. Every day, every hour, I asked ‘Why?’ Nobody
answered me."

Sense of the absurd

Making the films, which involved joint training sessions, gave them
the chance to express their frustration about a conflict they see
as senseless.

Many of the films combine sadness with humour. Photo: Conciliation
Resources

A film by Azeri journalist Madina Nik-Najat, titled "The Bug-gobblers",
unravels how conflicts begin, and the role of seemingly irrelevant
differences in behaviour.

It juxtaposes members of two neighbouring groups, explaining why
they simply cannot get on, mentioning different speeds of talking
and methods of baking bread. The audience at a screening in London’s
Institute of Contemporary Arts laughed out loud.

Madina describes the film as "almost a comedy, showing that conflict
will be present whenever there is difference".

Vafa’s film introduces the audience to a former solider, blinded in
battle, who bears the scars of the bullet which robbed him of his
sight at his temple.

He has rebuilt his life. He has returned to university to become a
teacher, got married and had a child but, asked if he would return
to the battlefield, he replies unhesitatingly: Yes.

The project, organised partly by Conciliation Resources, aims to
develop dialogue between young people from both sides of the conflict.

The idea is that the films will be shown to both Armenian and Azeri
audiences, but there is no guarantee that this will happen.

Sevak Hayrapetyan, a 26-year-old Armenian student, nonetheless says
he hopes the films may help increase understanding between Azeris
and Armenians.

"The war was incomprehensible for me," he says.

"I don’t know if this project will help end the stalemate but these
are at least small steps."

A War Of Declaratios And Threats: Nagorno-Karabakh: Passions Are Esc

A WAR OF DECLARATIONS AND THREATS: NAGORNO-KARABAKH: PASSIONS ARE ESCALATING AGAIN
Andrei Korbut
Translated by Elena Leonova

Agency WPS
Source: Voenno-Promyshlennyi Kurier, No. 37, September 26, 2007, p. 3
What the Papers Say Part A (Russia)
September 27, 2007 Thursday

An update on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and
Azerbaijan; The Nagorno-Karabakh peace talks appear to be frozen
indefinitely. Meanwhile, gunfire is being heard more and more
frequently in the conflict zone; and some politicians, especially in
Azerbaijan, are saying that the Nagorno-Karabakh problem should be
solved by force.

The co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, dealing with Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict regulation, visited Nagorno-Karabakh, Armenia, and Azerbaijan
on September 16-18. Their meetings with the leaders of these countries
were apparently aimed at furthering the negotiation process. But
when they visited Yerevan, Baku, and Stepanakert, all they heard
were words about being prepared to support the efforts of conflict
regulation mediators. In other words, these meetings failed to produce
any sensational news. The Minsk Group co-chairs – Yuri Merzlyakov
(Russia), Matthew Bryza (USA), and Bernard Fassiet (France) – failed
to reach agreement on a new round of negotiations at any level. Both
Baku and Yerevan maintain that now is not the appropriate time to
talk of a meeting between the presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia.

In short, the peace talks appear to be frozen indefinitely.

Meanwhile, gunfire is being heard more and more frequently in the
conflict zone; and some politicians, especially in Azerbaijan, are
saying that the Nagorno-Karabakh problem should be solved by force.

In fact, the spirit of armed force is already perceptible in this
process. According to the Azeri Defense Ministry, the ceasefire in
the conflict zone was broken 256 times between January and August of
2007. In other words, gunfire is recorded at least once a day along
the dividing line between Armenian and Azeri troops.

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict began in 1988, when the mostly
Armenian-populated Nagorno-Karabakh announced its secession from
Azerbaijan. On December 10, 1991 – only a few days before the Soviet
Union’s official break-up – Nagorno-Karabakh held a referendum in
which 99.89% of its residents voted for complete independence from
Azerbaijan. This was followed by widespread armed conflict, as a
result of which Azerbaijan lost control of Nagorno-Karabakh and some
adjacent regions. After a ceasefire came into effect on May 12, 1994,
miltary action in the conflict zone was halted. By then, 25-30,000
people had been killed and around a million people had been forced
to leave their homes.

The ceasefire is supposed to be still in effect – but the speeches of
politicians are taking an increasingly militant turn. For example,
Azeri politician Vafa Guluzade suddenly proposed that Turkey should
send "a couple of divisions" to Nakhichevan and aim them at Yerevan;
he alleged that Russia has troops in Armenia – so why shouldn’t Turkey
have troops in Azerbaijan?

Such statements may seem extremist, but observers are getting the
impression that the official leadership of Azerbaijan – President
Ilham Aliyev – is also inclined to pursue a military solution to
the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. In a recent interview with Verslo
Zinios/Business News and Verslo klase/Business Class (Lithuania),
Aliyev said: "If we are 100% certain that negotiations will lead to
nothing, we have every right under international law to re-establish
our territorial integrity by any means we choose, up to and including
military force – and we make no secret of that. We should be prepared
for that, and we are preparing for that." Aliyev said that Azerbaijan
will increase its military spending in 2008, from the present level of
around $1 billion a year. "That’s a lot of money. But we are living
in a state of war – our lands have been occupied – so we must spend
however much is necessary on this area," said Aliyev.

BAKU: Azerbaijan Accuses Armenia Of Obstructing Cooperation Of Borde

AZERBAIJAN ACCUSES ARMENIA OF OBSTRUCTING COOPERATION OF BORDER GUARDS OF SOUTH CAUCASUS COUNTRIES (VIDEO)

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
Sept 25 2007

Azerbaijan, Baku / Trend corr. K.Zarbaliyeva / Implementation of the
regional projects of border guards services of the South Caucasus
countries have been complicated due to the ongoing occupation of the
Azerbaijani territories by Armenians, Elchin Guliyev, the chief of
the State Frontier Service of Azerbaijan, said on 25 September.

The conflict between the two countries of South Caucasus began in 1988
due to territorial claims by Armenia against Azerbaijan. Armenia has
occupied 20% of the Azerbaijani land including the Nagorno-Karabakh
region and its seven surrounding Districts. Since 1992, these
territories have been under the occupation of the Armenian Forces. In
1994, Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement at which time
the active hostilities ended. The Co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group
( Russia, France and USA) are currently holding peaceful negotiations.

During the meeting of the Task Group within the framework of the
International conference on frontier issues in Baku, Guliyev noted
that measures have been taken to increase border control in compliance
with the State program on Efficient Frontier Guard Development of
Azerbaijan for 2006 and 2010.

The full program will be carried out by 2009.

The Azerbaijan Frontier Service participates in two projects. One of
them is held on a national level, the second within the framework of
the European Neighbourhood Policy through the support of the European
Commission on provide assistance to the South Caucasus countries to
establish the system of integrated frontier management.

The relevant issue of discussions at the meeting will be the theory and
experience of integrated frontier management, the agenda of the 16th
plenary meeting of the international conference on frontier issues,
functioning of Task Groups and many other issues.

The representatives of frontier services of the US, Germany, Belarus,
Great Britain, Bulgaria, Turkey, Hungary, Poland and many other
countries, international migration organizations, agencies FRONTEX
and BODERPOL will participate at the meeting.

Azerbaijan joined the International conference on frontier issues in
2002. Presently, Azerbaijan is the member of three Task Groups and
the head of one of them.