Present-Day Armenian-Turkish Border Illegal In The Context Of The In

PRESENT-DAY ARMENIAN-TURKISH BORDER ILLEGAL IN THE CONTEXT OF THE INTERNATIONAL LAW: ARMENIA HISTORIAN

ArmInfo
2009-05-27 16:15:00

The present-day Armenian-Turkish border is illegal in the context of
the International Law, Ashot Melkonyan, Director of History Institute
at the National Academy of Armenia, told media, Wednesday.

He is sure that there is a precondition to normalization of the
Armenian-Turkish relations though our leadership persuades the people
of the opposite. ‘The issue of recognition of Turkey’s territorial
integrity is in shadow, but still on agenda. The Moscow and Kars
treaties of 1921 signed by the Soviet Russia and Kemalist Turkey have
no force. These are illegal documents since none of those states was a
subject of the international law then. Now, we should not give force to
these documents. I hope our leadership will be wise enough not to go
on such step’, the historian said. Melkonyan is sure that if Armenia
does not recognize the conditions of the above treaties, Turkey may
resort to diplomatic tricks to force Armenia recognize its borders
under relevant resolutions of the UN recognizing the territorial
integrity of Turkey. ‘The USA has always had the map of Armenia and
Turkey drawn in 1920 by President Woodrow Wilson. No one has cancelled
that map yet, so it has no lost force’, the historian said.

ANKARA: Davutoglu: Minsk Group Not Able To Make Progress

DAVUTOGLU: MINSK GROUP NOT ABLE TO MAKE PROGRESS

Today’s Zaman
May 26 2009
Turkey

Hours before his visit to the Azerbaijani capital for an official
visit, Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu underlined that the
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group
of countries, mediating talks between Yerevan and Baku to resolve
the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute, has yet to make progress. Davutoglu’s
remarks came late on Sunday while speaking with the Anatolia news
agency in Damascus, where he represented Turkey at the 36th session
of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the Organization of the Islamic
Conference (OIC).

Recalling that he would depart on Monday from Damascus for Baku with
his Azerbaijani counterpart, Elmar Mammadyarov, who also participated
in the OIC meeting, on board his private plane, Davutoglu noted that
the Nagorno-Karabakh issue has remained unresolved for 17 years.

"We will head to Baku together on board the same plane. This has turned
out to be something like ‘one state, two nations’; ‘one nation, two
delegations’," Davutoglu said, in apparent reference to the common
motto of "one nation, two states" reigning in Turkey and Azerbaijan.

Davutoglu, whose visit to Baku will be his second official visit upon
being appointed to his current post earlier this month, had traveled
by private plane to Damascus on Saturday morning accompanied by
a delegation of diplomats from his ministry. "It is not possible
to disagree with [Azerbaijani President Ilham] Aliyev’s remarks
concerning the performance of the Minsk Group," Davutoglu said,
referring to Aliyev’s recent remarks in which he reiterated the
inefficiency of the 17-year activity of OSCE Minsk Group, created to
bring together a conference on conflict settlement. "As a matter of
fact, the historical record exposes this [fact]. Because no progress
has been made, it is now necessary to rescue this issue from being in
the status of a frozen conflict. Turkey will continue its efforts,"
Davutoglu said.

Boxing: Irish face tough test in Armenia

Boxing: Irish face tough test in Armenia

Independent.ie
Saturday May 23 2009

THE IABA’s remarkable sequence of having won medals at every
international tournament they have entered — including the Olympic
Games — since November 2007 will be put to the test in Armenia over
the next week.

A six-strong Irish squad are in Armenia for the AIBA World Junior
Championships which starts in Yerevan today.

The championships have attracted a record 51 nations and Irish coach
Jim Moore reckons it is going to be tough.

"We have put in a lot of preparation and we are quietly confident, but
it will be tough."

Sweeney planning to kick up a ‘Storm’

UNBEATEN Mayo cruiserweight Michael ‘The Storm’ Sweeney has his final
fight before starting a US campaign next month when he meets
Lancashire’s Mark Nilsen at the Events Centre in Castlebar tonight,
WRITES THOMAS MYLER.

"Michael cannot afford to lose this one as he makes his pro debut on a
national television card in Texas on June 16," said his Dublin manager,
Tommy Egan.

Irish superfeatherweight champion Eddie Hyland has a six-rounder
against Latvia’s Juris Ivanovs while Dublin lightweight Oisin Fagan
makes his first appearance since being stopped by Amir Khan in December
when he meets Bulgarian Assen Vassilev.

Lynch secures top-class crown

LEON Lynch and Gary Molloy were the first two boxers to be crowned
champions as a top-class National Youth Championships concluded with 15
finals at the National Stadium.

Lynch won after his 48kg clash with Blaine Dobbins was stopped in the
second round and Molloy emerged victorious over Chris Phelan, winning
by a four-point margin.

Michelle Chambers claimed a bantamweight title for Castlebar in the
first female final with a 6-1 win securing the 54kg Irish crown.

Sean McComb won Belfast’s first belt after beating Dublin Docklands
bantamweight Glen Holmes 7-4.

Book Review: Witness in the Armenian killing fields

Globe and Mail, Canada
May 23 2009

Witness in the Armenian killing fields

by KEITH GAREBIAN
BOOK REVIEW; HISTORY; Pg. F11

ARMENIAN GOLGOTHA
A Memoir of the Armenian Genocide, 1915-1918
By Grigoris Balakian
Translated by Peter Balakian with Aris Sevag
Knopf, 505 pages, $42

More than one million Armenians were exterminated by the Ottoman Turks
in the first genocide of the 20th century, in what Raphael Lemkin (a
Polish Jew and legal scholar who invented the term after the Second
World War to describe race-murder) regarded as the template for
genocide in the modern era, and what we can now see as the paradigm
for the Jewish Holocaust and for genocides in Ukraine, Cambodia,
Rwanda, the Balkans and Darfur.

My father was Armenian, and one of a multitude of orphaned victims of
the Ottoman scourge. He was not yet 5½ when pan-Turkic ideology flamed
into race-murder on April 24, 1915. He barely remembered his own
father’s face. He certainly did not remember any of his grandparents
or their names. What he remembered of his mother was a woman dying as
much of a broken heart as from starvation and thirst in the desert
leading to Der Zor (widely known as "the Auschwitz of the Armenian
genocide").

My father had an older sister who survived with him, but their
youngest sister was given to a Kurdish farmer and his barren wife, and
their other sister, a girl also younger than my father, was abandoned
to her fate during the nightmarish trek. He could not remember her
name when he recounted the tale to me near the end of his
life. Children themselves, he and his eldest sister had had no
alternative but to abandon this little girl whom they could not feed
or care for while they were forced to eat grass or animal
excrement. His final image was of a little starving girl, with curly
hair, crying by herself beside an inhospitable tree, where she was
probably soon taken as prey by scavenging dogs or wolves.

There is irony in the fact that my father was named Adam, though I
believe he had his own views on Original Sin. For him, the fall of man
was dated April 24, 1915, when hundreds of thousands of Armenians were
forced from their homes to be tortured and slaughtered by Turks. My
father survived, but his survival, like those of other Armenians who
after the First World War dispersed to other countries – defeating the
Ottoman plan to exterminate their race, carried burdens of traumatized
hearts.

The Ottoman plan for ethnic cleansing was brilliantly evil. The Turks
eliminated the intelligentsia so that Armenians would have no active
leaders. They eliminated able-bodied men so that Armenians would have
no militia. They eliminated the old so that Armenians would have no
memory. They eliminated the young so Armenians would have no future.

They were wrong in the final calculation. Memory and hope for the
future live in seminal texts such as Grigoris Balakian’s Armenian
Golgotha, a massive memoir first published in Armenian in 1922 and now
making its debut in English via the graces of Balakian’s distinguished
great-nephew, author Peter Balakian.

The long narrative starts in August, 1914, at the outbreak of the
First World War. Born in 1876 in Tokat (a small, multicultural Turkish
city), Balakian, whose father was a merchant and whose mother was a
writer, is in Constantinople after having studied engineering in
Saxony and theology in Berlin, making him fluent in German. Russia has
declared war on the Ottoman Empire, and the Muslims have proclaimed
jihad against Christians to incite religious war against the Allies,
but also inflaming anger toward Armenians, who are resented for their
skills and crafts and regarded the way Jews would be in Nazi Germany:
as despicable vermin contaminating the nation.

Draconian laws go into effect, radically curtailing Armenian civil
liberties and rights. In February, 1915, interior minister Mehmet
Talat informs German ambassador Hans Freiherr von Wangenheim that he
is going to resolve the Armenian Question by eliminating the
Armenians. As the Germans observe developments, Balakian, along with
about 250 other cultural leaders, is arrested and deported to a prison
in central Turkey.

Deportation was, of course, a code word, just as the phrase "take care
of the Armenians" was a euphemism. By the end of 1915, three-quarters
of the Ottoman Armenians were wiped out, and in many villages and
towns, entire Armenian populations were massacred. Balakian does not
censor the horrors: children forcibly Islamized; political leaders
hanged; death squads, armed with axes, cleavers, knives and rocks,
cutting and hacking away at arms, legs and necks, then throwing the
bodies into ditches and covering them with lime; young girls beheaded
like sheep when they do not submit to sexual advances; suckling
infants dismembered; faint screams of children being eaten alive by
wild animals after having been abandoned. The sequence of atrocities
is the Armenian Passion in the religious sense of suffering, and Der
Zor (where the killings exceeded 400,000) is the ultimate place of
skulls, or Golgotha.

Balakian’s prose is hot, unlike Primo Levi’s (in Survival in
Auschwitz), which is as cool as a scientist observing laboratory test
tubes and chemicals. It recreates wrenching moments: a scene of
schoolboys pleading with him to be rescued from Turkish mobs; a train
ride generating tormented anxiety and melancholy; a German nurse who
embraces the decapitated body of a six-month-old infant; Armenians
kissing skulls of the dead; four elderly Armenian women uttering a
vehement curse worthy of a tragic Greek chorus. The prose is not
overheated, however, except when Balakian is pious (quoting from the
Scriptures) or sentimental (indulging in purple prose or paeans to
nature).

Weighted with eyewitness accounts and distinguished by Balakian’s
prodigiously sharp memory, this book is not a scholar’s history, of
course, but an educated prelate’s, with an enviable grasp of Ottoman
and European history. It explains German and European imperialist
designs on Turkey and Turkish resentment, and how Turkey exploited the
chaos of war (as Peter Balakian shows in his introduction).

But the author points his finger as well at his own people, condemning
a minority of Armenian traitors, but also revealing how the Armenians’
openness of mind and heart victimized them. Many Armenians found it
hard to believe that they could be so viciously hated. There were a
few brave uprisings – in Zeytoun, Musa Dagh, Van and Sardarabad, for
instance – but the Ottomans used these isolated cases as a pretext for
their atrocities.

Despite times of utter despair and pessimism, Balakian survives after
living like a wild animal for almost four years in mud, rain and
snow. Three things help him: his patriotism, of course; his role as
unofficial leader of the deportees; and his knowledge of German. In
the course of his adventure, he poses as a German worker on the
Berlin-Baghdad railway, a German Jew, a German engineer, a German
soldier and a Greek vineyard worker.

But there are also good-hearted, sympathetic Turks who come to his
rescue and to that of some other fortunate Armenians. So his book is
not a wholesale condemnation of Turks, though it probably won’t be
read by most Turks, who still can’t accept responsibility for one of
history’s greatest crimes against humanity. It should be, of course,
for how could a people be expected to understand and atone for a story
they have never been officially permitted to know?

Keith Garebian is completing Children of Ararat, a poetry manuscript
on his father and the Armenian genocide.

Related Reading

TWICE A STRANGER

The Mass Expulsions That Forged Modern Greece and Turkey

By Bruce Clark, Harvard University Press, 274 pages, $24.95

In the wake of the First World War, the break-up of the Ottoman Empire
saw more than two million people expelled from their homelands to
comply with the treaty of Lausanne, which "solved" the problem of
religious minorities by forcing all Christians to move from Turkey to
Greece, and all Muslims from Greece to Turkey.

PARADISE LOST

Smyrna 1922: The Destruction of Islam’s City of Tolerance

By Giles Milton, Sceptre, 426 pages, $18.95

In the early part of the 20th century, Smyrna, on Turkey’s Aegean
shore, was considered a beacon of tolerance. In 1922, after three
years of war with Greece, the Turkish army moved in and, over the next
two weeks, burned and sacked the city. Milton interviewed survivors
and collected unpublished letters, journals and other eyewitness
testimony. (This book will be published in Canada in July.)

THE WORLD AND DARFUR

International Response to Crimes Against Humanity in Western Sudan

Edited by Amanda F. Grzyb, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 349 pages

Grzyb, a University of Western Ontario scholar, has collected the work
of 10 experts to comment on and analyze the conflict between the
International Criminal Court and Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir,
whom the ICC has charged with crimes against humanity. Al-Bashir has
countered by expelling international aid agencies from Darfur and
Northern Sudan.

The ‘Common Ground’ Myth

THE ‘COMMON GROUND’ MYTH
By Julia Duin

The Washington Times
May 21 2009

Unfortunately I was out last week because of shoulder surgery and was
only able to observe l’affaire Notre Dame from my living room couch.

Despite my OxyContin-addled brain, a lot did not seem right about this
picture of President Obama, resplendent in a royal blue academic gown,
waxing eloquent about life issues at a Catholic campus. Especially
about "common ground" on an issue that has none.

Does this "common ground" idea really work? On peripheral issues,
yes. On life-and-death issues, no.

Plus, I wondered, to what other audience has the president lectured
as to needing to find "common ground" with their opponents?

When he goes to Egypt in a few days, will he lecture his Muslim
listeners on finding common ground with Jews?

Did he tell the mostly Muslim Turks in April they need to find
common ground with the Orthodox Christian Armenians? And, during his
well-publicized July 2007 speech at a Planned Parenthood banquet, did
he tell his listeners they need to find common ground with pro-lifers?

It seems that one side of the debate is always told it needs to move
to the center on a given issue, while the other side is told it needs
to stand firm.

"So let’s work together to reduce the number of women seeking abortions
by reducing unintended pregnancies," the president said Sunday at Notre
Dame. But how does one do so? One way is through contraception, which
the Catholic Church opposes. Another is through abstinence education,
which the Obama administration opposes and is doing everything in
its power to defund.

"Let’s honor the conscience of those who disagree with abortion,
and draft a sensible conscience clause," he went on to say. Wait
a minute; the Bush administration overhauled the conscience clause
last year, partly for the benefit of Catholic hospitals and medical
professionals. And the Obama administration has been working nonstop
to rescind it.

As I listened to TV clips of his speech, I kept on thinking there
was a huge disconnect somewhere.

Maybe it’s that some issues don’t have a common ground. Life-and-death
issues have a problematic way of being black and white.

Either you abort an unborn child or save it. An unborn child is either
human or not.

Or, either Saddam Hussein was a villain and killed thousands of Kurds,
or he was not and did not.

Or close to 6 million Jews were killed by the Nazis, or they were not.

The president did allow that both sides of the abortion debate have
"irreconcilable" views, but he did not take the next step of saying
that some views are more right than others. When he appealed to the
Golden Rule as a principle uniting all faiths, he did not add that
treating others as we wish to be treated might include allowing that
other a right to be born.

And Martin Luther King, who the president quoted, did not waste
his energies trying to reach common ground with his racist
persecutors. Instead, he took prophetic stances against them.

Here in Washington on May 8, Archbishop Raymond Burke, a top Vatican
official, tore into Notre Dame, saying its invitation to Mr. Obama was
"a source of the greatest scandal." In this "death" culture, he added,
it’s the nature of Catholicism to be countercultural.

Not jostling for common ground.

Generous Serge Azatich

GENEROUS SERGE AZATICH

LRAGIR.AM
15:56:52 – 22/05/2009

The amnesty, on the possibility of which the NA Speaker Hovik
Abrahamyan dwelt the other day, saying that Serge Sargsyan will
declare an amnesty on May 28, David Hakobyan considers this step an
act of generosity.

He stated that he had told Serge Sargsyan the words of Alexander of
Macedonia who says that the generosity is the generosity of gifted
persons, and added that he is happy that Serge Sargsyan thought about
his words. David Hakobyan thinks that Serge Sargsyan will declare
amnesty not for political proposes but in order to unite the nation.

In answer to the question of the reporters, what he thinks about the
statement of the opposition according to which, after the release of
the political prisoners the opposition is ready to cooperate with the
government. David Hakobyan stated that he is against the cooperation
with the government, which leads a foreign policy contradicting the
national interests.

BAKU: French Embassy In Turkey: Normalization Of Turkey-Armenia Rela

FRENCH EMBASSY IN TURKEY: NORMALIZATION OF TURKEY-ARMENIA RELATIONS AND SOLUTION TO NAGORNO KARABAKH CONFLICT ARE SEPARATE PROCESSES

APA
May 20 2009
Azerbaijan

Ankara – APA. French embassy in Turkey issued a statement on the
visit of OSCE Minsk co-chair Bernard Fassier to Ankara, APA reports
quoting Turkish news agencies. The statements says that France supports
normalization of relations between Turkey and Armenia and together
with other co-chairs of OSCE Minsk Group Russia and US makes efforts
for fair solution to Nagorno Karabakh conflict.

"Normalization of Turkey-Armenia relations and solution to Nagorno
Karabakh conflict are parallel processes and should progress at the
necessary rate. Improvement to be made in one of these two processes
will be a very positive step for the entire region. France considers
that the normalization of Turkey-Armenia relations will have positive
influence on the settlement of Nagorno Karabakh conflict and other
conflicts in the region."

RA Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan Met With NKR President Bako Sahaky

RA PRIME MINISTER TIGRAN SARGSYAN MET WITH NKR PRESIDENT BAKO SAHAKYAN

Tue sday, 19 May 2009

The Prime Minister of Armenia said to be pleased with the existing ties
of cooperation between the Republic of Armenia and the Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic and appreciated those coordinated steps taken by the two
governments to mitigate the impact of the global crisis.

During the meeting, the parties exchanged views on economic reform
underway in the NKR.

The President of the NKR noted that the programs supported by partners
from Armenia have shaped an atmosphere of effective interaction to
bring about tangible results.

The meeting was attended by NKR Prime Minister Ara Haroutunyan.

http://www.gov.am/en/news/item/4653/

Tomasz Knothe: Opinion That Russia Opposes Eastern Partnership Erron

TOMASZ KNOTHE: OPINION THAT RUSSIA OPPOSES EASTERN PARTNERSHIP ERRONEOUS

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
20.05.2009 19:21 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The opinion that Russia opposes the Eastern
partnership is erroneous, Poland’s Ambassador Tomasz Knothe said.

"I am surprised to hear this, as all EU member countries deny Russia’s
opposition to the initiate. Russia and EU have developed their own
program aimed to simplify the visa system," he said.

According to Ambassador Knothe, actions and statements by certain
countries create an impression that Russia stands against the Eastern
Partnership.

Jay Parini: A Survivor Of The Armenian Massacre Turns Trauma To Test

JAY PARINI: A SURVIVOR OF THE ARMENIAN MASSACRE TURNS TRAUMA TO TESTAMENT

History News Network

M ay 19 2009

[Jay Parini is a novelist, poet, and professor of English at Middlebury
College. His latest book, Why Poetry Matters, was published last year
by Yale University Press.]

… Peter Balakian, a poet and professor of English at Colgate
University, has written movingly about the Armenian genocide in Black
Dog of Fate: A Memoir (Basic Books, 1997) and The Burning Tigris: The
Armenian Genocide and America’s Response (HarperCollins, 2003). In
the latter, he focused on the genocide itself, offering a good deal
of fresh archival research (including interviews with survivors)
revealing the origins and inhumanity of efforts to erase the population
of Armenian Christians within the Ottoman Empire. It was a conflict
that had simmered for two decades, although its roots lay deep in
the Middle Ages, when Turks invaded what was the Armenian homeland,
in Asia Minor. By 1915, Armenian Christians imagined themselves an
integral part of the Turkish state. They served largely as merchants
and middlemen, and their part in the economy perhaps gave them a false
sense of their own position. Certainly the idea of "ethnic cleansing"
was beyond their imagination.

Grigoris Balakian, the great-uncle of Peter Balakian, was a priest
(later bishop) in the Armenian Apostolic Church. He was among the key
intellectuals of his time and place, and he was one of the Armenian
leaders arrested in 1915 and deported to the interior. In 1918 he
wrote a shocking and brilliant memoir of the genocide, an eyewitness
account of a high order. Now, at last, it has been translated (by his
nephew, with Aris Sevag) in Armenian Golgotha (Knopf). It’s a memoir
that will fit well on a shelf beside the poems of Anna Akhmatova and
the memoirs of Vasily Grossman, Primo Levi, and Elie Wiesel. And it
defines what we have come to think of as "Holocaust memoirs."

It seems strangely ironic that, a couple of years back, the
Anti-Defamation League, headed by Abraham Foxman, actually backed
the Turkish government in its efforts to suppress historical truth by
dissuading Congress from recognizing the Armenian genocide. Foxman,
apparently under pressure, later changed his mind on that. Those who
commit genocide bank on the fact that the future has a weak memory,
or so it would seem. There is a natural instinct at work in the human
mind, which tries to erase the memory of pain.

Pain suffuses this book by Father Balakian, his own and that of
others. He recalls a conversation with a young Armenian woman who said
to him, "Oh, Reverend Father. There’s no pain that we haven’t suffered;
there’s no misfortune that hasn’t befallen us." Going on to lament that
even bowing to pressure to convert to Islam did not save her people,
she asks in anguish, "Oh, where is the God proclaimed by us? Doesn’t
he see the infinite suffering we have endured?"

In scene after scene, the unspeakable is spoken. The priest describes
one ghastly massacre outside of Sungurlu that occurred on August 20,
1915. More than 70 carriages conveyed a cluster of Armenian women,
girls, and small boys to a lonely valley by a bridge an hour and half
from the town. When the caravan reached the appointed area, police
officers and soldiers joined a wayward gang of Turkish slaughterers,
setting to work with a vengeance that is scarcely believable. "Just
as spring trees are cut down with bill-hooked hedge knives," writes
Balakian, "the bloodthirsty mob attacked this group of more than four
hundred with axes, hatches, shovels, and pitchforks, hacking off their
appendages: noses, ears, legs, arms, fingers, shoulders. … They
dashed the little children against the rocks before the eyes of their
mothers while shouting ‘Allah, Allah.’"

The situation of the Armenians was often so dire, he wrote, that
"in exchange for a piece of bread, Armenian mothers, known for their
maternal devotion, sold their beloved sons or daughters to the first
comer, Christian or Muslim." That wasn’t cruelty or indifference;
given the fact of certain death, there was at least a chance that
the child could survive in other hands. There was also the fact of
starvation, which was how so many came to grief in those terrible
years, while the world turned a blind eye….

http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/85708.html