Presidents Of Armenia And Latvia Attend Festive Event Dedicated To 5

PRESIDENTS OF ARMENIA AND LATVIA ATTEND FESTIVE EVENT DEDICATED TO 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF MATENADARAN’S FOUNDATION

Noyan Tapan
Dec 9, 2009

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 9, NOYAN TAPAN. A festive event dedicated to the
50th anniversary of the foundation of the Matenadaran – the Armenian
Repository of Ancient Manuscripts – took place in Yerevan on December
9. Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan and Latvian President Valdis
Zatlers, who is on a three-day state visit to Armenia, participated
in the event.

Director of the Matenadaran Hrachia Tamrazian stated that with the
donation of businessman Sergey Hambartsumian, the Matenadaran will
soon grow into a new scientific research complex to be three times
as large as the current one.

The Catholios of All Armenians Karekin II expressed satisfaction at
the fact that the country’s authorities take care of the Matenadaran
with its great legacy of translations, scientific and literary works.

None Of The Three Death Cases Was Of A/H1N1

NONE OF THE THREE DEATH CASES WAS OF A/H1N1
Alisa Gevorgyan

"Radiolur"
10.12.2009 15:23

The healthcare institutions in Armenia continue working in emergency
regime. Accoridng to Vahan Poghosyan, Head of the Healthcare Management
Department of the Ministry of Health, the ambulatory clinics will be
open even on weekends. The healthcare institutions have been provided
enough of Tamiflu, which will be distributed to citizens in case
of necessity.

The Ministry of Health keeps under control the epidemic situation in
the country. A hot line has been opened at the ministry (52-88-72,
56-53-23).

According to Vahan Poghosyan, there’s no need to panic. It’s simply
necessary to be alert and take all measures to prevent flu.

Head of the Inspection for Hygienic and antiepidemic Surveillance
of the Ministry of Health Artavazd Vanyan assures that positive
trends have been registered after the schools and kindergartens were
closed up.

"Be sure that we are going to have an abrupt decline on December
12-13. Let’s meet next week to see that I’m right," chief
infectiologist of Armenia Ara Asoyan said.

Ara Asoyan assured also that none of the death cases over the past
three days was of swine flu.

RA Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian To Take Part In Meeting Of Eas

RA FOREIGN MINISTER EDWARD NALBANDIAN TO TAKE PART IN MEETING OF EASTERN PARTNERSHIP FOREIGN MINISTERS

Noyan Tapan
Dec 7, 2009

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 7, NOYAN TAPAN. RA Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian
will leave for Brussels on a short visit to take part in the meeting
of Eastern Partnership Foreign Ministers on December 8.

Noyan Tapan was informed about it by the RA Foreign Ministry Press
and Information Department.

Tehran Police Opens Fire To Disperse Demonstrators

TEHRAN POLICE OPENS FIRE TO DISPERSE DEMONSTRATORS

PanARMENIAN.Net
07.12.2009 21:15 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Iranian security agents started releasing air shots
to disperse anti-government demonstrations, according to one of local
reformers’ Web site.

"Security forces started shooting in the air to disperse demonstrators
from Enghelab Square. Sporadic clashes between police and protestors
continue," MIGnews.com reports with reference to Mowjcamp portal.

Police and special services were earlier reported to be using bludgeons
and tear gas.

Manifestations were taking place on the two squares of Iranian capital,
as well as in Tehran University.

Demonstrators are being arrested.

Remarks By President Obama And Prime Minister Erdogan Of Turkey Afte

REMARKS BY PRESIDENT OBAMA AND PRIME MINISTER ERDOGAN OF TURKEY AFTER MEETING

The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
December 07, 2009

PRESIDENT OBAMA: I want to extend the warmest of welcomes to Prime
Minister Erdogan. I’m glad that I, personally, and the American
people have a chance to reciprocate the wonderful hospitality that
was extended to me when I visited Turkey in April.

As I said when I had the great honor of addressing the Turkish
Parliament in Ankara, I am strongly committed to creating the best
possible relationship between Turkey and the United States.

Turkey is a NATO ally, which means that we are pledged to defend each
other. There are strong ties between our countries as a consequence
of the Turkish American community that has been established here. We
have had the opportunity to work together during this recent financial
crisis, given Turkey’s role as a member of the G20. And given Turkey’s
history as a secular democratic state that respects the rule of law,
but is also a majority Muslim nation, it plays a critical role I think
in helping to shape mutual understanding and stability and peace not
only in its neighborhood but around the world.

During the course of our discussions here, we’ve had the opportunity
to survey a wide range of issues that both the United States and
Turkey are concerned about. I thanked Prime Minister Erdogan and the
Turkish people for their outstanding contributions to stabilizing
Afghanistan. We discussed our joint role in helping Iraq achieve the
kind of independence and prosperity that I think has been advanced as a
consequence of the election law finally being passed over the weekend.

We discussed issues of regional peace, and I indicated to the Prime
Minister how important it is to resolve the issue of Iran’s nuclear
capacity in a way that allows Iran to pursue peaceful nuclear energy
but provides assurances that it will abide by international rules
and norms, and I believe that Turkey can be an important player in
trying to move Iran in that direction.

And we discussed the continuing role that we can play as NATO allies
in strengthening Turkey’s profile within NATO and coordinating more
effectively on critical issues like missile defense.

I also congratulated the Prime Minister on some courageous steps
that he has taken around the issue of normalizing Turkish/Armenian
relations, and encouraged him to continue to move forward along
this path.

We reaffirmed the shared commitment to defeat terrorist activity
regardless of where it occurs. I expressed condolences to the Prime
Minister and the Turkish people for the recent terrorist attack
that was taken there and pledged U.S. support in trying to bring the
perpetrators of this violence to justice.

And finally, I complimented the Prime Minister for the steps that
he’s taken, often very difficult steps, in reintegrating religious
minorities and ethnic minorities within Turkey into the democratic
and political process, and indicated to him that we want to be as
supportive as possible in further steps that he can take, for example,
assuring the continuation of the Halki Seminary and addressing the
vital needs of continuing the ecumenical patriarchy within Turkey.

Over all, just to summarize, I am incredibly optimistic about the
prospect of stronger and stronger ties between the United States
and Turkey that will be based not only on our NATO relationship,
our military-to-military relationship, our strategic relationship,
but also increasing economic ties.

And one of the concrete outcomes of this trip is to follow through on
discussions that I had with both Prime Minister Erdogan and President
Gul in Turkey to stand up a strategic working group around economic
issues and improving commercial ties. That will be launched with
the participation of Secretary of Commerce Locke and our U.S. Trade
Representative Ambassador Ron Kirk, along with Turkish counterparts.

And we think that there is enormous potential for us to grow trade
and commercial ties between the two countries.

Turkey is a great country. It is growing in influence around the
world. And I am pleased that America can call Turkey a friend, and
I’m pleased that I’m able to call Prime Minister Erdogan personally
a friend. I’m grateful for his trip here and look forward to many
years of collaboration with him to observe both the prosperity of
the American people and the Turkish people.

Thank you.

PRIME MINISTER ERDOGAN: (As translated.) Thank you very much. I’m very
grateful for the hospitality that both myself and my delegation have
been shown since our arrival here. And I would like to once again
express my thanks for that hospitality.

The fact that the President visited Turkey on his first overseas trip
and that he described and characterized Turkish-U.S. relations as a
model partnership has been very important for us politically and in
the process that we all look forward to in the future as well. And
important steps are now being taken in order to continue to build
on our bilateral relations so as to give greater meaning to the term
"model partnership."

Of course, there are many sides to the development of this relationship
— be it in the economic area, in the areas of science, art,
technology, political areas and military areas.

We have also appointed two people from our side to act as counterparts
in order to liaise with their American counterparts to continue on
this process. Those two people are the Deputy Prime Minister, Mr. Ali
Babacan; and the Minister of State responsible for economic affairs,
Mr. Zafer Caglayan on the Turkish side. I do believe that this group
is going to work to take the Turkish-American relations forward,
not just in the economic area, but in all areas in general.

We, of course, have — we take joint steps on regional issues. This
is in the Middle East, in Iraq, with respect to the Iranian nuclear
program. We continue to have joint activity in Afghanistan, and the
Turkish armed forces have taken over the command of the forces there
for a third time with the additional support that we have sent to
Afghanistan in the last couple of months. And there are steps that we
have taken with respect to training activity and other activities in
the context of provisional reconstruction teams, and we continue on
that. We’ve had an opportunity to continue discussing those issues
during our visit here.

Another important area, of course, is energy. Turkey is a transit
country for energy issues. And the agreement has been signed for
Nabucco and we are ready to take some important steps with respect
to Nabucco.

We continue to talk with Azerbaijan. I do believe that positive
progress will be made in this area. In addition to Azerbaijan, of
course, there is the importance of companies like Statoil, Total,
and British Petroleum and others.

We have also discussed relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia,
which is of great importance. This is important in the context of
Turkish-Armenian relations. We have discussed the Minsk Group and what
the Minsk Group can do — the United States, Russia, and France — to
add more impetus to that process. I can say that to have more impetus
in the Minsk process is going to have a very positive impact on the
overall process, because the normalization process between Turkey and
Armenia is very much related to these issues. As the administration
in Turkey, we are determined to move forward in this area.

Another important issue with respect for us in Turkey is the fight
against terrorism. And there was a statement that was made in this
very room on the 5th of November 2007, which was very important in
that context, because at the time we had declared the separatist
terrorist organization as the common enemy of the United States,
Turkey, and Iraq, because terrorism is the enemy of all mankind.

Our sensitivity and response to terrorism is what we have displayed
when the twin towers were hit here in the United States. Wherever
a terrorist attack takes place our reaction is always the same,
because terrorism does not have a religion — a homeland. They have
no homeland, no religion whatsoever.

We have also had opportunity to discuss what we can do jointly in
the region with regard to nuclear programs. We as Turkey stand ready
to do whatever we can to ensure a diplomatic solution to the nuclear
issue in our region. And we stand ready as Turkey to do whatever we
can do with respect to relations between Israel and the Palestinians,
and Israel and Syria, because I do believe that, first and foremost,
the United States, too, has important responsibility in trying to
achieve global peace.

And we, too, must lend all kinds of support that we can in our regions
and — in our respective regions and in the world in general in trying
to achieve global peace, because this is not the time to make enemies,
it’s the time to make friends. And I believe that we must move hand
in hand towards a bright future.

Thank you once again.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Thank you.

All right, where’s Ben Feller? There you are.

Q Thank you sir. I’d like to ask you briefly about a domestic issue,
that being the economy, heading to your speech tomorrow. Do you support
the use of federal bailout money to fund job creation programs? Is
that an appropriate use of that money? Is that something that you
plan to support tomorrow?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: You know, Ben, it would be a mistake for me to step
on my speech tomorrow by giving you the headline today.

Q Not that big a mistake. (Laughter.)

PRESIDENT OBAMA: But let me speak generally about what we’ve seen.

On Friday we got the best jobs report that we’ve gotten in a very
long time. And it significantly beat expectations. At minimum, it
showed that for all practical purposes, we’ve stopped losing jobs. And
that’s consistent with the fact that in the third quarter we saw the
economy grow.

My first job when I came into office was to make sure that we got
the financial crisis under control and that we tried to limit the
devastating effects that it was having on the real economy. We have
had a very tough year, and we’ve lost millions of jobs. But at least
now we are moving in the right direction.

What my speech tomorrow will focus on is the fact that having gotten
the financial crisis under control. Having finally moved into positive
territory when it comes to economic growth, our biggest challenge now
is making sure that job growth matches up with economic growth. And
what we’ve seen is, is that companies shed jobs very quickly, partly
induced by the panic of what was happening on Wall Street, and they
are still tentative about hiring back all those people who were laid
off. Also what we’re seeing is some long-term trends where companies
are becoming so efficient in terms of productivity that they may feel
that they can produce the same amount of goods or services without
as many employees.

So those present some particular challenges, given the fact that
we lost over 3 million jobs just in the first quarter of this year
before any of the steps we took had a chance to take effect.

With respect to TARP specifically, I think you saw stories today and
you’ve seen stories over the last several weeks that TARP has turned
out to be much cheaper than we had expected, although not cheap. It
means that some of that money can be devoted to deficit reduction.

And the question is are there selective approaches that are consistent
with the original goals of TARP — for example, making sure that small
businesses are still getting lending — that would be appropriate in
accelerating job growth?

And I will be addressing that tomorrow. But I do think that, although
we’ve stabilized the financial system, one of the problems that we’re
still seeing all the time — and I heard about it when it was in
Allentown just this past week — was the fact that small businesses
and some medium-sized businesses are still feeling a huge credit
crunch. They cannot get the loans that they need to make capital
investments that would allow them to then expand employment. And so
that’s a particular area where we might be able to make a difference.

Is there somebody in the Turkish delegation that wants to call on
a reporter?

Q Mr. President, is there any new and concrete U.S. action plan for
disarmament and the elimination of the PKK terror organization in
northern Iraq? Thank you, sir.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, what the Prime Minister and I have discussed
is coordinating closely in dealing with the problem of the PKK. We
have stated before and I have reaffirmed since I came into office
that the United States considers PKK a terrorist organization, and
that the threat that it poses not only in Turkey but also in Iraq
is one that is of deep concern. And as NATO allies, we are bound to
help each other defend our territories. More broadly, I think that
it is important for us to have a consistent position with respect to
terrorism wherever it takes place.

So we discussed how we can coordinate militarily. I will tell you
that with respect to the issue of the PKK, I think that the steps
that the Prime Minister has taken in being inclusive towards the
Kurdish community in Turkey is very helpful, because one of the
things we understand is, is that terrorism cannot just be dealt with
militarily; there is also social and political components to it that
have to be recognized.

With respect to Iraq, I think the degree to which the Kurdish
population within Iraq feels effectively represented within the
central government in Baghdad, to the extent that we can resolve some
long-term pressing issues like Kirkuk, the more I think that Kurds
will recognize that their interests are not in supporting any kind of
military activity but rather in working through conflicts politically,
in a way that allows everybody to be prosperous. And that’s the kind
of process that we would encourage.

Okay? Thank you very much, everybody. Happy holidays.

Armenian Foreign Minister To Participate In The Meeting Of The Forei

ARMENIAN FOREIGN MINISTER TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING OF THE FOREIGN MINISTERS OF THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES

ARMENPRESS
Dec 7, 2009

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 7, ARMENPRESS: Armenian Foreign Minister Edward
Nalbandyan is leaving for Brussels on a short time visit to participate
in the December 8 meeting of the foreign ministers of the Eastern
Partnership countries, Press and Information Department of the Foreign
Ministry reported.

National Security Service Of Armenia Prevents Attempt To Smuggle Big

NATIONAL SECURITY SERVICE OF ARMENIA PREVENTS ATTEMPT TO SMUGGLE BIG AMOUNT OF GOLD FROM TURKEY

ArmInfo
2009-12-07 14:17:00

ArmInfo. The National Security Service of Armenia has prevented an
attempt to smuggle a big amount of gold from Turkey.

The press center of the Service reports that they have detained
Armenak Tigranyan, resident of Gyumri, who tried to smuggle the
gold from Turkey. Tigranyan and Zatik Boyajyan from Yerevan went to
Istanbul and bought 8.5kg of goldsmithery. Tigranyan hid the gold
in the engine of Chrysler car and Dec 5 carried it via Bavra customs
point on the Armenian-GEorgian border.

Russia Can Gradually Become Key Player In Caucasus: Azerbaijan Diplo

RUSSIA CAN GRADUALLY BECOME KEY PLAYER IN CAUCASUS: AZERBAIJAN DIPLOMATIC ACADEMY FOREIGN POLICY PROGRAMS DIRECTOR

Today.Az
07 December 2009 [11:57]

Trend News interview with the director of foreign policy programs of
Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy Fariz Ismailzade.

You attended one of the most prestigious political forums Wilton park.

What are your impressions of the forum? What issues were on the focus
of attention at this conference?

Wilton park conference, conducted since 1946, is one of the most
prestigious forums in the world, uniting well-known experts, political
scientists and representatives of the political elite at different
times. The current conference was devoted to the South Caucasus. It
was attended by Deputy Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan Araz Azimov, the
ambassador of Azerbaijan to the UK Fakhraddin Gurbanov, Deputy Prime
Minister of Georgia, Minister for Reintegration Timur Yakobashvili,
First Deputy Minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration of
Georgia Tamara Berchuashvili, EU Special Representative for South
Caucasus Peter Semneby, Deputy Foreign Minister of Armenia Karina
Kazanyan, well-known experts Svante Cornell, Brenda Shaffer, Oksana
Antonenko, Sabina Fraser, John Roberts. The main topics of discussion
at the conference were conflicts, the main issue – the opening of
Turkish-Armenian border and the consequences of the Georgian war.

I was surprised by the position of the Turkish side, particularly
the Professor of Turkish Middle East Technical University Hussein
Bakhcha, who claimed that the border between Turkey and Armenia should
be opened. However, the Azerbaijani delegation insisted that exactly
closing borders is a stimulus for Armenia to solve the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict and liberate the occupied territories. This view was supported
by Brend Shaffer and Svante Cornell. The Armenian delegation insisted
that the issue of opening the borders should be considered separately
from the issue of Nagorno-Karabakh settlement.

Regarding the statement by the Armenian delegation that the people
of Karabakh have the right to self-determination, the British expert
Stephen Bolt noted that the right to self-determination belongs to the
African and Asian countries, which fought for independence in 1960,
and is not acceptable to the issue of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Much attention was also paid to the Georgian war in 2008. The Georgian
side presented its plan to resolve the situation. The first step
to resolve the situation should be the demilitarization of the
territories, the second – it is people’s diplomacy, the third –
to find ways of cooperation between Georgia and South Ossetia.

The last panel of the forum was devoted to questions of democratization
in South Caucasus countries. Negative aspects of democratization in the
region were reflected in the speech by the head of the International
Crisis Group Sabina Fraser. My speech focused on the fact that the
process of democratization in South Caucasus is a long way, which
can not be performed for 18 years of independence of these countries.

During the forum, were also made recommendations for the EU for
cooperation with countries of South Caucasus.

Upon completion of the conference, I made a number of conclusions.

Firstly, the EU does not understand our realities and our internal
problems. Secondly, in my opinion, the West is too optimistic about
the opening of Turkish-Armenian border, believing that it is even
useful for the peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

All our arguments that the situation is only getting worse from
obstinacy of Armenia have not led to results. In my opinion, the
forum took place on a too optimistic note and the West does not
understand how Armenia is ill with nationalism and creates problems
in any negotiation process.

What is the role of the West in the South Caucasus now, after the
war in Georgia, where many geopolitical accents were removed?

After President Obama came to power, a certain lowering is felt in
the U.S. interest in Georgia. Bush relied on Georgia, but now the U.S.

fully focuses on the normalization of relations between Turkey and
Armenia, giving preference to this project in the region. Both the
U.S. and the EU and Russia are ready to support processes that will
help Armenia in the future leave the economic isolation. With regards
to the issue of Nagorno-Karabakh, still the West does not insist
on the liberation of Azerbaijani territories occupied by Armenians,
believing that this can be achieved after the opening of borders.

According to the West, to solve two issues at once is more difficult
than one after the other, and therefore, yet our position on the
linkage of opening borders and the Nagorno-Karabakh issue is not in
their understanding and support.

Such a policy of the West and Turkey can get into question the
existence of such a strategically important project as Nabucco, and
Azerbaijan gradually can increase the volume of gas supplies to Russia.

Do you think Turkey is not afraid of losing Azerbaijan?

According to Turkey, Azerbaijan should not be jealous for rapprochement
of Ankara and Yerevan, but in my opinion, there is a potential threat
for Turkey to lose Azerbaijan.

It needs to understand that Ankara’s foreign policy priorities are
changing and Azerbaijan is no longer the only strategic ally in the
region. In my opinion, Turkey is connected with Russia by even closer
partnership than with Azerbaijan.

Why does the process of ratification of the protocols by the Turkish
Parliament is delayed?

Turkey underestimated Azerbaijan. The Turkish government thought that
it would easily pass the protocols through parliament, not expecting
such an active and sharp reaction from Azerbaijan. In my opinion,
this was an absolutely correct position of official Baku, because
after such a reaction, the Turkish government had to reckon with the
opinion of Azerbaijan.

The mistake of the ruling Turkish party was that they expected progress
in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. They did not consider that Armenia
will not make compromise in the Nagorno-Karabakh issue. Closer to
April, pressure on Turkey will increase and eventually, Ankara can
give up its positions and open borders, changing the tone of its
political statements.

What is Russia’s role in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement
and in the South Caucasus?

Azerbaijan’s mistake is that we still believe that Russia can somehow
influence on Armenia. However, Armenia plays its game, and as far
as we do not count on the support of President Medvedev, Armenia is
unlikely to make compromise in the issue of status of Nagorno-Karabakh
in the coming months. However, in the near future, Azerbaijan can
really get closer with Russia and the situation in the region can
change. If earlier in the Caucasus there were clear alliance ligaments:
Russia-Armenia, Turkey – Azerbaijan, West – Georgia, after the Georgian
war, the accent changed. And now Azerbaijan considers Russia as a
strategic ally. At the moment everything is going to ensure that Russia
becomes stronger, and the West’s position in the South Caucasus is
weakening. Now, Turkey and Russia become major players in the Caucasus.

A Stamboul Train full of writers

A Stamboul Train full of writers
Twenty European writers recently hopped on a train to Istanbul. What
were they up to, wonders Michael Prodger

By Michael Prodger

Daily Telegraph/UK
Published: 5:30AM GMT 06 Dec 2009

The most evocative of destinations: Istanbul Photo: GETTY
The journey to Istanbul by train has a venerable and generally
murderous literary history: as Agatha Christie’s Murder on the Orient
Express, Graham Greene’s Stamboul Train, Ian Fleming’s From Russia
With Love found their way on to the bookshelves they also chugged into
the subconscious. While the Orient Express covered the route with a
thick layer of glamour and romance these novels added a frisson of
danger. They ensured that emerging from a sleeper car in the Sirkeci
station, the pink faux-palace on the edge of the Golden Horn that
marks the end of the line, is still the most evocative way to arrive
in the most evocative of destinations.

Perhaps something of this rich history was in the minds of the British
Council and Literature Across Frontiers when they dreamed up the Word
Express project that took place in October. This saw some 20 young
European writers embarking on trains in Ljubljana, Bucharest and
Sarajevo and winding through the Balkans, stopping off along the way
to give readings and supervise writing workshops. The three groups
joined up in Thessaloniki before starting out on the last leg to
Istanbul. Once there they met up with a cluster of Turkish writers and
spent five day attending various literary events and taking part in
the Istanbul Book Fair and the Tanpinar Literature Festival.

Harmony was not necessarily assured. After all, the participants
included writers from Serbia and Bosnia Herzegovina, Turkey, Greece
and Armenia, Bulgaria and Israel ` states with a history of ethnic
violence or mutual hatred and distrust. Something of the region’s
tangled animosities was hinted at by the novelist Ognjen SpahiÄ? who,
at one event, announced he would be reading one of his short stories
in his native Montenegrin: he then wryly pointed out that Montenegrin
is the same as Serbian, Bosnian and Croatian but with the break up of
the Balkans his countrymen felt they had to have their own language
too.

Of course, part of the idea of Word Express is to use the lingua
franca of literature to calm national antagonisms. And among the
individual authors themselves it was remarkably ` and speedily `
effective. Days of close proximity – and the rocking of the trains –
turned a disparate selection of poets, novelists, playwrights and
filmmakers into an enthusiastic phalanx of mutually supportive
writers. Their enthusiasm was for each other as well as their shared
project.

The project itself, while encompassing all those noble but nebulous
supranational aims (building trust and understanding, encouraging
collaboration, generating dialogue etc), is also designed to produce
more concrete results. The writers have been pairing up and the
results of their collaborations will be published as part of stage two
next year ` new stories and dialogues emerging from the trip,
translations of each other’s work, film and video pieces. The profile
of the project, it is hoped, will also help attract publishers for the
other informal spin-offs that will emerge along the way.

Although this seems a relatively modest outcome for such a big venture
this is not, according to the Turkish novelist BariÅ? MüstecaphoÄ?lu,
the way to judge its success. As he points out, Britain has exported
the idea that the `creative industries’ have real economic heft. And
in Eastern Europe it is a valuable commodity because writers and
artists there have far less access to funding and support than their
British peers. Word Express, thinks MüstecaphoÄ?lu and others, is not
just about introducing writers to each other but about introducing
them to the decision makers of their own countries and showing that,
whatever the worth of their work, they nevertheless have real economic
worth.

As a final destination it is harder to get to than Istanbul but Word
Express has at least put it on track.