Yerevan accuses Azerbaijani President of irresponsible behavior

Arminfo, Armenia

ArmInfo. In Yerevan, they reacted to the statements of the President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev at the first meeting of the new convocation of the Milli Majlis.   Thus, the press secretary of the Armenian Foreign Ministry, Anna  Naghdalyan, responding to Aliyev’s remarks regarding Armenia, in  particular, noted:

“The President of Azerbaijan made an extensive  speech at the first meeting of the new parliament, which clearly  expressed hatred of Armenia and the Armenian people. Azerbaijani  authorities are trying hide the low level of legitimacy of the recent  parliamentary elections, the inability to carry out political and  democratic reforms behind aggressive, baseless and fictitious  statements, which apart from Armenia and Armenia and retirement homes  of the people, are also sent to European countries, European  institutions, international observation missions, monitoring  elections in Azerbaijan “.

At the same time, Naghdalyan expressed particular concern about the  fact that the Azerbaijani authorities are trying to play the  religious card in their baseless accusations, on the one hand  accusing European countries of violating the rights of migrants on  religious grounds, and on the other – voicing calls for religious  solidarity in the context of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict .

“The propaganda of a hostile attitude towards the Armenian people by  the President of Azerbaijan, accompanied by new historical and  geographical” discoveries, “fundamentally contradicts Azerbaijan’s  commitments in recent years to create favorable conditions and  prepare peoples for peace.  From this point of view, it must be noted  that the low level of democracy and the protection of human rights  seriously hinder the advancement of the peace process on the  Nagorno-Karabakh settlement, in particular, the implementation of the  agreements reached within the framework of this process.  The  attempts of the top leadership of Azerbaijan to legitimize themselves  by spreading hatred towards the people of the neighboring state and  distrust of the international community are irresponsible and can  jeopardize peace and security in the region, “the Armenian Foreign  Ministry spokeswoman summed up.  Recall that Aliyev during his speech  to the new parliament, referring to the Karabakh conflict, pointed  out the importance of intensifying efforts in all organizations and  conducting offensive diplomacy. “In connection with international  activities, I want to say that our deputies are represented in  several international organizations. Of course, activity there was  quite high in previous years. And now it should be even higher,  because we must bring the realities of Azerbaijan. Especially we must  bring the historical the realities connected with the  Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The Armenian side cannot put forward a  single serious argument against our arguments, because the truth is  on our side. After I said in Munich about Kurekchaysko I’m aware of a  peace treaty in Armenia, I know that this treaty is being crammed in.  It is clearly indicated who, when concluded this treaty. And there is  no talk of the Armenian people there. On the one hand, Russian  General Tsitsianov, and on the other, Ibrahim Khan, moreover, Ibrahim  Khan is written in Russian. Here’s the real  story, “Aliyev assured, while once again deciding to attribute all  the historical territories of Armenia to Azerbaijan, which was  created as a state in the early 20th century.

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 03/10/2020

                                        Tuesday, 
Armenian Soldier Killed At Border With Azerbaijan
An Armenian serviceman was killed at the border with Azerbaijan on Tuesday, 
Armenia’s Ministry of Defense reported.
It said that the incident occurred in the afternoon at the southwestern border 
with Azerbaijan’s Nakhijevan exclave and that 26-year-old contract soldier 
Zohrab Simonian was fatally wounded in the chest after a shot fired from 
Azerbaijani military positions.
The incident comes days after Armenia and Azerbaijan traded accusations over 
fresh border fighting that left at least one Azerbaijani soldier killed and one 
Armenian soldier injured.
On March 6, the Armenian military claimed to have thwarted an Azerbaijani 
commando raid on one of its positions along the northeastern section of 
Armenia’s border with Azerbaijan.
According to the Defense Ministry in Yerevan, an Azerbaijani “sabotage” unit 
attacked the outpost but was repelled by Armenian soldiers deployed there, 
“suffering losses” as a result.
Azerbaijan’s State Border Guard Service, whose troops protect that section of 
the border, denied the attempted incursion. It said that Armenian troops opened 
“intensive” fire on some of its positions from heavy machine-guns and sniper 
rifles earlier that day.
Armenia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a statement later on Tuesday, 
describing the latest ceasefire violation as “yet another attempt of Azerbaijan 
to intentionally escalate the situation on the Armenian-Azerbaijani state 
border.”
“Regular attempts by Azerbaijan to escalate the situation on the state border 
with Armenia, to expand the geography of escalation and refrain from applying 
the existing mechanisms of de-escalation attest to the deliberate nature of 
Azerbaijan’s attempts to undermine regional security and peace,” it said.
“Such actions of Azerbaijan demonstrate that the establishment of international 
risk reduction mechanisms is an important priority of the Nagorno-Karabakh peace 
process, and the implementation of agreements reached in that regard is a 
necessary condition for the advancement of the peace process.”
Armenia and Azerbaijan have been locked in a conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh for 
years.
A war in the early 1990s in which some 30,000 people were killed left ethnic 
Armenians in control of the region.
Diplomatic efforts to settle the conflict have brought little progress.
Armenian, Russian PMs Discuss ‘Global Economy’ Processes
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian (L) and Russian Prime Minister Mikhail 
Mishustin, Kazakhstan, Jan. 31, 2020
Processes taking place in the global economy have become a subject of discussion 
during a telephone conversation between Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian 
and his Russian counterpart Mikhail Mishustin.
The conversation was reported by Pashinian during a constitutional referendum 
campaign rally in the southern town of Kapan on Tuesday.
“I’ve had a telephone conversation with Prime Minister of the Russian Federation 
Mikhail Mishustin. We discussed the processes taking place in the global market 
and economy, and our plans,” the Armenian prime minister said, without 
elaborating.
Pashinian took a vacation today to start a series of rallies ahead of the April 
5 referendum in which his political team seeks the termination of powers of 
seven of the nine judges of the Constitutional Court, including the body’s 
chairman Hrayr Tovmasian.
His remarks at the rally in the provincial town came amid growing concerns among 
Armenians about the economic situation in Russia fueled by plummeting oil prices.
The Russian ruble continued to depreciate on Tuesday reaching a four-year low 
against the U.S. dollar amid a nearly 30-percent plunge in international oil 
prices –the largest decline since 1991.
Russia is one of the key trade and economic partners of Armenia. According to 
Armenia’s Statistics Committee, the Russian market accounted for nearly 28 
percent of Armenia’s exports (worth over $730 million in absolute terms) in 2019.
Armenian Economy Ministry spokeswoman Anna Ohanian told RFE/RL’s Armenian 
Service (Azatutyun.am) on Monday that the Armenian government was conducting “a 
comprehensive analysis” of the global and regional economic trends influenced by 
the falling oil prices and the tumbling Russian ruble in order to send “correct 
signals” to local manufacturers and exporters.
She said that changes taking place in Russia cannot but have an effect on the 
Armenian economy, which is a member of the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union, 
a post-Soviet trade bloc also including Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.
“The Russian Federation is one of our main trading partners. The Eurasian 
Economic Union, and Russia in particular, are a market for a considerable amount 
of our exports. Naturally, changes taking place there cannot but have an effect 
on our economy. Other things being equal, a depreciating ruble may have an 
impact on the competitiveness of Armenian manufacturers as compared to other 
main producers,” Ohanian said.
Pashinian Starts Rallies In Provinces Ahead Of Referendum
        • Artak Khulian
        • Sargis Harutyunyan
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian addresses a campaign rally in Meghri, 
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian took a vacation on Tuesday to get 
actively engaged in political campaigning ahead of next month’s constitutional 
referendum in which citizens will be asked to approve the termination of powers 
of several High Court judges.
Pashinian and his political team believe Constitutional Court Chairman Hrayr 
Tovmasian and six other judges elected before the 2015 constitution was fully 
enforced in April 2018 must be removed from office and new judges must be 
elected to replace them in order to maintain the spirit of the constitution.
To this end, the pro-government My Step faction in parliament initiated the 
constitutional amendment in February amid objections from opposition groups, 
including the extra-parliamentary former ruling Republican Party of Armenia 
(HHK) that alleged that Pashinian is simply seeking to gain control over the 
Constitutional Court and thus tighten his hold on power.
The HHK and other opposition parties have abstained from taking part in the ‘No’ 
campaign ahead of the April 5 referendum, considering the holding of the 
referendum itself unconstitutional.
Tovmasian and other judges to be affected by the change have also accused the 
government of putting pressure on the judiciary in an attempt to jeopardize its 
independence.
In his speech at today’s rally in Meghri Pashinian described the Constitutional 
Court as “the only remaining institution in Armenia that is not in compliance 
with the current constitution.”
“The Constitutional Court today does not represent the people. I urge you to go 
to polling stations on April 5 and confirm that you are sending home this old 
Constitutional Court, which had patronized all electoral frauds in Armenia in 
the past,” Pashinian said.
Pashinian earlier claimed that Tovmasian, who co-authored the 2015 constitution, 
had struck a deal with the then government to be elected chairman of the 
Constitutional Court only days before the new constitution was to be fully 
enforced.
Running the court under the previous constitution allows Tovmasian, who is now 
49, to hold the post until he is 65, that is until 2035. By contrast, had 
Tovmasian been elected after April 9, 2018, he would be confined to just one 
six-year tenure.
In his speech in Meghri Pashinian said: “Under the new constitution the election 
of the Constitutional Court’s chairman should be held once every six years and 
the same person cannot be elected for more than one term. But according to their 
interpretation, the next election should be held in 2035. It would be the same 
if we as a bloc that was elected to parliament for five years concocted some law 
that would allow us not to hold the next elections until 2035 because of some 
‘legal practice’ or something like that.”
Speaking at a rally in the town of Kapan, Syunik’s provincial center, Pashinian 
emphasized that the vote of Armenian citizens in the upcoming referendum will be 
a sovereign decision.“There is no force in the world that can challenge the 
decision of Armenia’s sovereign citizen,” stressed the prime minister, comparing 
the upcoming ballot with the 1991 referendum in which an overwhelming majority 
of Armenians voted in favor of gaining independence from the Soviet Union.
Pashinian visited several other towns in Armenia’s southern Syunik province and 
held rallies there today. He is expected to proceed with the campaign and hold 
more public rallies in other provinces of the country in the coming days.
The ‘No’ campaign in the current referendum is represented by a group of lawyers 
who have said they will not engage in public campaigning, but will limit their 
campaign to Facebook posts about alleged violations and reports to the Central 
Election Commission.
Former deputy Justice Minister Ruben Melikian, who represents the ‘No’ campaign, 
complained on Tuesday about what he described as yet another case of the prime 
minister using his administrative resource to promote his political campaign. 
He, in particular, pointed to the fact that Pashinian went to Syunik on board a 
helicopter that is assigned to the prime minister by law. “Using the helicopter 
citizen Nikol Pashinian got an advantage in his campaign over the opposite 
side,” Melikian claimed.
Earlier, the representative of the ‘No’ campaign also criticized Pashinian and 
other members of his political team for allegedly campaigning in their official 
capacity. The officials shrugged off the criticism.
Teenage Victim Of Domestic Violence Regains Consciousness In Armenian Hospital
        • Susan Badalian
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian (R) and Health Minister Arsen Torosian (L) visit 
13-year-old Nazeli Khachatrian in hospital, Yerevan, March 8, 2020
A teenage girl from Gyumri who was severely beaten up by a man who had also 
beaten her mother to death has regained consciousness, according to a hospital 
official in Yerevan.
Nazeli Khachatrian, 13, has been treated for multiple traumas, including a brain 
injury, in an intensive care unit of Yerevan’s Surb Astvatsamayr Medical Center 
since last week.
The girl allegedly tried to intervene to stop the beating of her mother by her 
cohabitant on March 5. Her 43-year-old mother succumbed to her injuries later 
that day.
Police arrested a 28-year-old man in Gyumri. He was later charged with 
manslaughter and “premeditated infliction of severe harm to other persons’ 
health.” The man faces up to 10 years in prison under the charges.
The case has shocked the Armenian public, renewing the debate in the country 
about the need to make domestic violence a more specific crime in the penal code.
A group of civil activists held a march in Gyumri on Monday raising their 
concerns about cases of domestic violence and what they described as 
indifference that exists in society towards the problem.
World Vision’s child protection program manager Aida Muradian believes it is 
necessary that domestic violence be separated from beatings in the criminal 
code. “We are dealing with the case of domestic violence, but this is not 
reflected in the indictment. Why is it so important?.. Because the victim of 
domestic violence is subjected to violence by a member of her own family. As a 
rule, the victim of domestic violence is in a certain dependence on the 
perpetrator -- be it emotional, economic or some other form of dependence. This 
means that these are significant circumstances that affect the case, and they 
cannot simply be ignored,” she said.
On March 8, International Women’s Day, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian 
together with Health Minister Arsen Torosian visited 13-year-old Nazeli in the 
hospital’s intensive care unit when she was still switched to an artificial 
ventilation apparatus.
“Many of us took with pain the news about this girl and her killed mother, but 
let’s admit that this girl and her mother have also become victims of the 
opinion that violence in general and violence against women in particular can 
have some justification,” Pashinian wrote in a Facebook post later that day.
Gevork Derdzian, of Yerevan’s Surb Astvatsamayr Medical Center, cautioned on 
Monday that despite regaining consciousness and having said a few words, “the 
condition of the girl still remains heavy, as she has multiple injuries.”
Nazeli, according to the hospital spokesman, is under doctors’ strict 
supervision.
The teenager, whose father died two years ago, has now become an orphan. Her 
other close relatives have refused to adopt her, but according to child custody 
workers in Gyumri, there are people who are ready to take care of the girl.
Armenians Urged To Return From Italy Over Coronavirus
Italy - A man wearing a protective mask passes by the Coliseum in Rome on March 
7, 2020
Armenian citizens who are currently in Italy have been urged to “urgently 
suspend their trips and return to Armenia” because of the spread of the new 
coronavirus (COVID-19) in this part of Europe.
In a statement issued on Tuesday Armenia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs also 
urged Armenian citizens to strictly refrain from visiting Italy “given the 
measures being taken by the Italian authorities aimed at preventing the spread 
of COVID-19.”
Authorities in Yerevan also called upon citizens who are currently in Italy to 
remain in constant contact with Armenia’s embassy in Rome.
Later on Tuesday the Irish budget airline Ryanair, which entered Armenia’s civil 
aviation market earlier this year, announced suspension of all flights from 
Yerevan to Italy and back until April 8.
Italy appears to have become the hotbed in Europe for COVID-19, a new 
coronavirus infection that broke out in China late last year, affecting more 
than 100,000 people and killing over 4,000 people globally since then.
The whole of Italy, a country of some 60 million people, has been placed under 
quarantine, as the Italian authorities have stepped up efforts to tackle the 
coronavirus outbreak that has affected more than 9,000 people and left 463 dead 
in the country.
Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte announced late on Monday that he was 
extending restrictions on travel, which had been in place in the north, 
throughout the country.
Earlier, authorities in Armenia also urged citizens to temporarily avoid 
visiting Iran, China, South Korea, Japan and EU countries (particularly Italy, 
Germany, France and Spain) over coronavirus risks, except in urgent cases.
Armenia reported its first and yet only coronavirus case on March 1. A 
29-year-old citizen of Armenia who had been evacuated from coronavirus-hit Iran 
along with scores of others had tested positive and was hospitalized. Thirty-one 
other citizens who may have had close contact with the infected person had also 
been placed under a two-week quarantine in a disused hotel in Armenia’s resort 
town of Tsaghkadzor.
No new coronavirus cases have been reported in Armenia since then as the country 
tightened control at its border with Iran and re-introduced entry visas for 
Iranian citizens.
Armenia’s universities and schools resume classes on March 9 one week after 
being closed by the government following the confirmation of the first 
coronavirus case.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2020 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

Armenia temporarily suspends visa-free regime with Iran in coronavirus precaution

Save

Share

 11:35, 2 March, 2020

YEREVAN, MARCH 2, ARMENPRESS. The Armenian Government is heightening and extending the restrictions on communication with Iran in a precautionary measure against the novel coronavirus, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan announced after a session of the task force on preventing the disease.

“Taking into account the epidemiological situation in our region we have made a decision to prolong and heighten the restrictions in the direction of the Armenian-Iranian border communication. We will begin a process on temporarily restoring a visa regime with Iran, and the visa regime will come into force within five days. We are in constant contact with our Iranian colleagues, we are offering our support to the good people and government of Iran in overcoming this difficult situation. We will support the friendly people and government of Iran as much as we can,” the PM said.

By the previous regulations, Iran and Armenia had a visa-free regime.

Edited and translated by Stepan Kocharyan

Armenian President holds meeting with Russian Ambassador

Save

Share

 16:40, 6 March, 2020

YEREVAN, MARCH 6, ARMENPRESS. President Armen Sarkissian received today Ambassador of Russia to Armenia Sergei Kopyrkin, the Presidential Office told Armenpress.

The sides exchanged views on the cooperation between Armenia and Russia in various areas.

Ambassador Kopyrkin thanked for the recent evening of Russian romance organized at the Armenian Presidential Palace within the frames of presidential series of concerts, which was dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the victory of Great Patriotic War. The officials also considered the possibility to hold joint events on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the Great Victory.

The Armenian President and the Russian Ambassador also discussed expanding the cooperation in the fields of science, education and new technologies.

Edited and translated by Aneta Harutyunyan




Asbarez: CASPS to Celebrate 25 Years of Service

March 6, 2020

CASPS 25th anniversary celebrations are set for Mar. 15

GLENDALE—The Committee for Armenian Students in Public Schools looks forward to its milestone gathering of community members, classmates, awardees, families, and District and School Board members, for a fun and relaxing celebration. CASPS’ 25th anniversary celebrations will be held on Sunday, March 15 at 4 p.m. at Glen Arden Club, located at 357 Arden Ave, Glendale, CA 91203.

During the celebratory evening, Principal of Clark Magnet High School Lena Kortoshian will receive a CASPS Service Award, honoring her for more than 20 years of collaboration with CASPS and her selfless dedication to all students. Please join us in enjoying good food, wine, live music, and friendship in support of Armenian youth.

For 25 years, CASPS has addressed the socio-educational needs of immigrant children in public schools. It has consistently honored its mission with professionalism and attention to the success of each and every student it has served since 1994. CASPS’ approach to assistance is marked with its ability to involve and work with administrators, school districts, parents, and students alike. Over the years, this small grass roots organization has served thousands of students and their families with services such as group counseling, tutoring, leadership training, encouraging art, leading effective parenting discussions, and much more, all in the best interest of our youth.

Nikol Pashinyan: If we decide that a referendum should be held on Amulsar mine operation, we will inform about it

Arminfo. Armenia
March 4 2020

ArmInfo. If we decide that a referendum should be held on the operation of the Amulsar mine, we will inform about this. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan  stated this in the parliament.

He noted that if to this day there has been no initiative then the  government does not consider it necessary.  “If the legislation of  Armenia makes it possible to resolve this issue through a referendum,  then the citizens of the country can raise the issue of its need  through civil initiative. This issue is considered exclusively in the  legal framework. And all the provisions of this law should be  examined. We will discuss this issue again,” Pashinyan said.  Amulsar  field is the second largest reserve in Armenia. According to the  company, the deposit contains about 73733 kg of gold with an average  grade of 0.78 g per ton, and 294.367 tons of silver with an average  grade of 9.29 g per ton. It is located in the south-east of the  country, 13 km from the spa town of Jermuk, between the rivers Arpa  and Vorotan.

It should be noted that despite the assurances of the Lydian company  that about $ 300 million has already been invested in the development  project of the Amulsar gold deposit, environmentalists do not share  the government’s enthusiasm about the attractiveness of the mine’s  operation plan. Environmentalists fear that the exploitation of the  field, during which sodium cyanide will be used, may lead to the  oxidation of water in rivers. Contaminated waters will become  unsuitable for drinking and irrigation and may cause irreparable harm  to the mineral springs of Jermuk and the ecosystem of Sevan.  Since  the end of 2018, the road to the field has been blocked by  environmental activists. The company in December last year announced  that it was starting the delisting of its shares on the Toronto Stock  Exchange, where they were quoted, and in fact announced a default. 

“We are ready”, says Armenian top medic as healthcare system gears up for worst-case scenario

Save

Share

 18:32,

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 24, ARMENPRESS. The Ministry of Healthcare has assessed the capacity of medical organizations and hospitals to evaluate the level of preparedness for a possible outbreak of the novel coronavirus in Armenia and all medical facilities have been given instructions, National Center for Disease Control and Prevention Director Artavazd Vanyan said at a news conference.

“Methodologic guidelines provided by the World Health Organization have been developed, translated, localized and given to all hospitals. We have also assessed the capacities of the medical organizations, as to what extent they are ready, what capabilities they have. The capacities are entirely assessed, and the ministry has issued an instruction for filling in the respective gaps. We are implementing this process,” Vanyan said.

He said they have conducted the assessment for a worst-case scenario, i.e. outbreak with large numbers of confirmed cases. The number of protective suits and masks and other items have been evaluated. “Wherever we see that the number is not enough we add capacity. It’s not that we have a problem. If we were to have cases, we are ready for it. I am speaking about an outbreak, a pandemic, we are considering the preparedness for the development of the most dangerous cases,” he said.

He said authorities are currently looking into the lack of protective masks in pharmacies. Vanyan said the Ministry of Healthcare has acquired around 160,000 masks and is now seeking to acquire more for healthcare workers.

So far, there haven’t been any novel coronavirus cases in Armenia.

 

Edited and translated by Stepan Kocharyan




Joint meeting of the Security Councils of Artsakh, Armenia held in Stepanakert

Aysor, Armenia
Feb 22 2020

On 22 February Artsakh Republic President Bako Sahakyan together with Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan partook at the joint meeting of the Security Councils of the two Armenian republics held in Stepanakert.

In his speech President Sahakyan touched upon a range of issues on domestic and foreign policies, particularly, related to the recent foreign political developments, army-building, realization of a number of strategically important socioeconomic projects in the republic’s southern regions.

Bako Sahakyan noted that the projects were ambitious, however, quite realistic, expressing his confidence that by joint efforts, systematic and consistent approach to the implementation of the activities, these projects would be brought to life.

Asbarez: Pashinyan, Aliyev Discuss Karabakh during Panel in Munich

February 18,  2020

After a brief meeting on the margins of the Munich Security Conference, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan discussed the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict resolution process on Saturday in an unusual panel discussion during which the two leaders answered questions from the audience.

The moderator of the discussion, veteran Eurasian security policy expert Celeste Wallander, first allowed Aliyev to make opening remarks, during which the Azerbaijani president, citing obscure treaties claimed that Armenians did not exist in the Caucasus, perhaps attempting to bolster his long-standing claims that he will “reclaim Yerevan.”

Below is a readout of the Pashinyan’s responses provided by the prime minister’s press office.

Pashinyan retorted by saying: “I would ask President Aliyev not to go that far into history because when Armenian King Tigran the Great was negotiating with Pompeus, there was no such country in the South Caucasus and in the world in general named Azerbaijan. Therefore, I do not think that it is right to go that far back in history, since I can go even further and start from 405 BC, for example, but I would not do so because I do not think that it is the right way to go.

Coming to the status of Nagorno-Karabakh as a state, I would rather disagree with President Aliyev, because the Caucasian Bureau made a legitimate decision that Karabakh should be part of Armenia, but after that the decision was reversed in Moscow on the personal initiative of Joseph Stalin. It seemed like a plot, an arrangement between Stalin, Lenin and Ataturk. Karabakh has never been part of an independent Azerbaijani state. Karabakh was handed over to Azerbaijan in the process of forming the Soviet Union. And when we are talking about territorial integrity, we have to decide which country we are talking about.

My question is whether Azerbaijan respected the territorial integrity of the Soviet Union when it broke away from the Soviet Union just as Nagorno-Karabakh did. If you think that I am now speaking about a country that does not exist any longer – I mean the Soviet Union – I would counter by saying that either the Soviet Republic, of which Nagorno-Karabakh used to be part, is inexistent; there is no Soviet Socialist Republic of Azerbaijan, and that is true. Nagorno-Karabakh gained independence from both the Soviet Union and Soviet Azerbaijan in the same way as Azerbaijan broke away from the Soviet Union.

As for Khojalu, in the mid-1990s, former President of Azerbaijan Ayaz Mutalibov said in an interview with Russian Nezavisimaya Gazeta newspaper that Khojalu’s provocation was organized by the Azerbaijani opposition with a view to ousting him from power.

As regards the UN Security Council documents, let us see what those documents implied after all? They called for an unconditional and immediate ceasefire, that is, to stop violence and hostilities. And when we look at UN Security Council Resolution 8.8.4, we can see that it says that Azerbaijan was the one to have violated the ceasefire, due to which it lost territories. And I deem it important to state that Azerbaijan failed to respect the provisions of the Security Council Resolution.

I think that instead of repeating over and over the same things for the past 25 or 30 years, the Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders ought to come up with new approaches and ideas, as I am afraid that the international community is tired hearing the same things.

When I became Prime Minister following a non-violent people’s revolution, I realized that it is impossible to settle a long-standing conflict in one or two steps. And I felt that in order to resolve this conflict we need revolutions. And I started the process of micro-revolutions.

Next time I have the opportunity to address the audience, I will try to explain the importance of micro-revolutions in the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process that I have initiated. Thank you.”

Question – You are in this international audience: there are many experienced negotiators who have been working on this challenge for almost 30 years trying to bring about a peaceful settlement of the dispute. What would you like the international community to do to help you advance the option that you believe is a just and peaceful solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict?

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan – There is a very specific contribution that the international community can make, namely to make it clear, to stress that there can be no military solution to the Karabakh conflict. If someone thinks otherwise and says that there is a military solution to the conflict, I think the people of Nagorno Karabakh will answer that the conflict is already resolved. However, I think that we need a lasting peace.

Armenia does not represent Nagorno-Karabakh in the negotiation process, but I know that Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh are ready to make real efforts to achieve a lasting peace in our region. And as the Prime Minister of Armenia, I consider this situation not only my responsibility for the security of my country, but I see it as my responsibility for regional and global security.

And I suggest that President Aliyev, too, should perceive this situation as a common task. That is, to achieve a lasting peace and stability and to view this situation not only as a matter of our national agenda, but also as a matter of global and regional security. And our responsibility, our duty is to do our best in order to contribute to global security. I can assure you that Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh are ready for it.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan responded to the remarks made by President Ilham Aliyev: “I would like to make some comments. First of all, the UN Security Council resolutions do not feature the wording “Armenian troops,” we read “local Armenian forces” there. That is, people in Nagorno-Karabakh formed self-defense forces and, therefore, there is no mention of the Armenian army in the texts of UN Security Council resolutions. As for the victims, yes, it is a tragedy, it is a conflict and thousands of people died as a result of that conflict, both Armenian and Azeri, and that is a fact.

However, I myself have read ex-president Ayaz Mutalibov’s interview in Nezavisimaya Gazeta, and I think we can find it on the internet. As for historical facts, there is a book, entitled “Nagorno-Karabakh: legal aspects.” What I said about city names and ethnic cleansing can be found in that very book and in history textbooks.

There was a Shahumyan region where there is no Armenian living now, though formerly it used to be populated solely by Armenians. Shahumyan region now has an Azerbaijani name, which is a very difficult word for me to utter. In addition, President Aliyev noted that an Azeri soldier was killed by an Armenian, while earlier today an Armenian soldier was wounded by an Azerbaijani sniper. And our mutual task is to stop this process.”

Question – I am a researcher at the Max Planck Institute for International Law. President Aliyev mentioned the role of international law. My question is addressed to both speakers. Why not submit the dispute to the International Court of Justice by special agreement?

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan – We, too, are committed to the negotiation process, to the peace process, and I think that the negotiations should take place in the OSCE Minsk Group format. As I said, we are prepared to make real efforts to change the situation and reach a solution to the conflict. But no one asked me about those mini revolutions I have made in the negotiation process.

My principled approach is as follows: it is impossible to solve this conflict in one or two steps. I feel that we need micro-revolutions in order to translate them into mini-revolutions after which we will have a breakthrough in the negotiation process.

What was that micro-revolution? In September 2018, I announced that any solution in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict should be acceptable to the people of Armenia, the people of Karabakh and the people of Azerbaijan. This is a micro-revolution because I am the first leader of Armenia who says that any solution should be acceptable for the people of Azerbaijan as well. I am not only the only leader of Armenia, but also I am the only one from the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan who says that any solution should be acceptable for all sides. And now a year has passed since that Revolution. This is a very important micro-revolution.

The next revolution is that during one of my press conferences I called on Armenian and Azeri social media users not to use social media to insult and threaten each other. I called on social media to use new technologies to try to understand each other better.

This is another approach, and I have tried to speak directly to the people of Azerbaijan. I do not mind if President Aliyev speaks to the Armenian people. However, the President of Azerbaijan is refusing to speak to the people of Karabakh.

But we are faced up with a very strange fact: President Aliyev is reluctant to talk to Nagorno-Karabakh’s representatives, which is a very strange fact. It is impossible to solve the Karabakh conflict without talking to the people of Karabakh, is it?

By the way, Nagorno Karabakh was twice recognized by the OSCE as a party to the conflict and a negotiating party. It happened on March 24, 1992 and at the 1994 OSCE Summit in Budapest. Thank you.

Question – Russia is one of those countries that are trying to find a solution. One suggestion was that maybe the status issue should be left over at this point, and the mediators should be trying to do something that the parties might agree upon, for example, concerning the formation of a corridor, the territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh, and so on. Do you see any possibility for an intermediate solution?

The question was first answered by President Ilham Aliyev, to which Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan responded, saying: “By the way, we have managed a mutual micro revolution on either side, and I hope to have the opportunity to dwell thereon. When we first met in Dushanbe, the capital of Tajikistan, we just made a mini-revolution together with President Aliyev. Our meeting was followed by an unprecedented fall in tensions and we were able to create a direct line for communication and exchange of information. I must admit that President Aliyev was a co-author in this case.

President Aliyev talks about territories, while for Karabakh it is a matter of security. We need to understand why today’s status quo was established, because when Nagorno-Karabakh tried to exercise its right to self-determination, hostilities began against the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh, and the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh were forced to organize themselves for self-defense.

President Aliyev referred to Shushi and Stepanakert, which is the capital of Nagorno-Karabakh. Stepanakert used to be shelled from Shushi for many years in a row. Civilians used to live in underground shelters for a long time, and that is the truth. Now, it is impossible for anyone to compromise Karabakh’s security.

President Aliyev spoke about Azerbaijan’s armed forces. My son is doing his military service in Nagorno-Karabakh; he went there as a volunteer. He went to defend his compatriots because he knows history very well; he knows what has been going on since 1988. I mentioned Shahumyan region, where the population was 100% Armenian, now there is not a single Armenian living there. We also remember the fate of Nakhichevan, where there was a huge Armenian population. Nakhichevan is an autonomous republic within Azerbaijan, and now there is no Armenian there.

Also, President Aliyev says that Nagorno-Karabakh is not a party to negotiations and to the conflict, but Azerbaijan has twice signed agreements with Nagorno-Karabakh. For the first time in 1994, it was a ceasefire agreement between Armenia, Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijan. The defense ministers signed the document. Three months later. in July, 1994 they reaffirmed that the ceasefire should be maintained until a political settlement is reached.”

At the end of the discussion, responding to Azerbaijani President’s statement, Pashinyan said: “Mr. President, it was not too constructive, but I would say that in the times of Tigran the Great there were only two nations in our region – Armenians and Georgians. And this was the case not only in the times of Tigran the Great, but also during the rule of the Bagratides and the Arshakunis. It can be found in any history book. I am happy for this discussion. I would like to reaffirm that Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh are ready to make real efforts to resolve the conflict.”

[see video]

Azerbaijani press: Analyst says Yerevan responsible for Armenian saboteur’s death

By Abdul Kerimkhanov

Analyst of The Baku Network think tank Elkhan Alаsgаrov has said that Yerevan bears the responsibility for the death of Armenian saboteur Manvel Saribekyan about whom the European Court of Human Rights recently passed a ruling.

The saboteur in question – Armenian citizen Manvel Saribekyan – was detained on 11 September 2010, with several espionage equipment, while a group of Armenian saboteurs were prevented on the north-west direction of the line of contact of the armed forces of Armenia and Azerbaijan. Saribekyan committed suicide a month later while in prison.

“It is Yerevan that should be blamed for his tragic death, rather than only Baku. Obviously, the death of Saribekyan, as well as common political goals behind the accusations made against Baku concerning the violation of the international law, do not concern the Armenian authorities,” Elkhan Alаsgаrov said.

Commenting on the Armenian Foreign Ministry’s statement about Saribekyan, Alasgarov noted that Yerevan seeks to mislead the international community.

“The main thesis of the [Armenian MFA’s] document is that, allegedly, the threat is upon life of every Armenian who falls under the control of the Azerbaijani authorities, regardless of his/her status. Thus, the Armenian Foreign Ministry is disseminating a new myth that upon the decision concerning Saribekyan’s case, the ECHR ‘confirmed the impossibility of Karabakh Armenians living in Azerbaijan as this poses a threat to their lives,’” Alasgarov noted.

“While recognizing the jurisdiction and legitimacy of the ECHR and rejoicing at the decision regarding Saribekyan’s case, Yerevan should recognize not only other decisions of the European Court, but also four UN resolutions and numerous resolutions of international organizations,” he stressed.

Furthermore, Alasgarov believes no positive changes occurred in the ideology of the Armenians with Pashinyan’s coming to power.

“The ruling by the ECHR quite resembles primitive statement of criminal Robert Kocharyan, who is in the Yerevan prison, about the “genetic incompatibility of Azerbaijanis and Armenians” and the slogan by fascist Garegin Nzhdeh that ‘there shouldn’t be a day without fighting the Turk’,” the analyst said.

Instead of preparing the Armenian people for reconciliation, he noted, Pashinyan’s team uses rhetoric that cuts off all roads leading to peace.

“The Armenian side still hasn’t learned that false theories have sad consequences,” Alasgarov stressed.

Alasgarov pointed out that Yerevan must recognize the rulings by the ECHR on numerous violations of human rights in the occupied Azerbaijani territories.

“Without recognition of the rights, first of all, of hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijani IDPs violated by the invaders in Nagorno-Karabakh and seven surrounding districts, as well as compensation for the damage caused to them, it is better for the Armenian Foreign Ministry to keep silent about the Saribekyan case,” Alasgarov said.

He called the previous decision of the European Court of Human Rights, issued regarding the case of Chiragov and Others v. Armenia, as one of the most important decisions in connection with the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict that have been accepted till now.

Alasgarov said that the peculiarity of the decision is that it is the first judicial document in connection with the Karabakh conflict, in which Armenia is recognized as the culprit of the crimes committed.

“The European Court of Human Rights-ECHR, the most authoritative court of the world, adopted a decision on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, in which it confirmed the fact of occupation of Azerbaijani territories and the fact that Armenia is an occupying country. The European Court has entrusted all responsibility for the violation of human rights in the occupied territories upon Armenia, which is to restore human rights, in the first place, of the hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijanis from Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent regions,” Alasgarov stated.

He considers that ECHR’s decision puts before Yerevan the obligation to unconditionally withdraw the Armenian forces from the conflict zone.

“In addition, Armenia must pay compensation in the “Chiragov and Others v. Armenia” case. At the same time, this payment will set a precedent, which will entail claims from 800,000 internally displaced persons regarding the payment of compensation to them by Armenia,” he said.

Alasgarov further recalled the verdict of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg dated 17 December 2013, in the case of “Perincek v. Switzerland”.

“The European Court decided that, unlike the Holocaust fact proven in the legal field, the narrative about the so-called “Armenian genocide” is not a historical fact, but a fiction of one of the parties, and by no means the only one,” Alasgarov told.

Speaking about opinion of international academic circles on the so-called “Armenian genocide”, he said that there is no consensus, it is unlikely to be reached, and any criminal prosecution for expressing an opinion is a violation of the articles of the European Convention on Human Rights.

“Over the course of many years of practice of the ECHR, not a single case of non-enforcement of its decisions by member states of the Council of Europe has been recorded. Otherwise, according to the Statute of the Council of Europe, this can lead to suspension of a state’s membership and, in the end, in accordance with the decision of the Committee of Ministers, to expulsion from the Organization,” Alasgarov added.

He noted that Armenia’s unwillingness to comply with the judgments of the ECHR regarding the “Perincek v. Switzerland” case, to stop the unilateral interpretation of the so-called “Armenian genocide”, as well as restoring the rights of hundreds of thousands of Azerbaijani IDPs, the case “Chiragov and Others v. Armenia”, is a clear evidence of Yerevan’s rejection of international law.

Abdul Kerimkhanov is AzerNews’ staff journalist, follow him on Twitter: @AbdulKerim94 

Follow us on Twitter @AzerNewsAz