Pashinyan congratulates Biden on July 4, lauds U.S. support to Armenia’s territorial integrity,sovereignty and democracy

 11:29, 4 July 2023

YEREVAN, JULY 4, ARMENPRESS. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has sent a congratulatory message to the President of the United States of America Joe Biden on the occasion of Independence Day.

The letter reads as follows,

“Honorable Mr. President,

On behalf of the Republic of Armenia and myself, I warmly congratulate you and the friendly people of the United States on Independence Day.

The United States and its people have gone through the difficult task of building a state by uniting around the idea of independence, forming a vision of a democratic future, and overcoming difficulties together. Continued US leadership in democracy contributes to the promotion of the fundamental values of freedom, equality, and inalienable human rights in many countries.

Active Armenian-American bilateral relations in recent years are promising, especially in the areas of democratic reforms, strengthening the rule of law and fighting corruption. I am happy to record that we have cooperation based on mutual trust between our governments, which gives an opportunity to effectively address the existing challenges and further strengthen the connection between our states and peoples.

We highly appreciate the position of the United States in supporting the territorial integrity, sovereignty and democracy of the Republic of Armenia, which was demonstrated in practice during the years 2021-2022. We also highly appreciate the efforts of the USA in the direction of establishing long-lasting and sustainable peace in the South Caucasus, normalizing Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, and addressing the rights and security of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh. The Republic of Armenia continues to adhere to the peace agenda for the sake of the inviolability of the territorial integrity of the Republic of Armenia, for the sake of independence, sovereignty and long-term peaceful development in the region.

Mr. President, I once again congratulate you on Independence Day and wish you and the American people prosperity, peace and continued progress.”

CoE: Turkey Using Sweden’s NATO Membership Bid To Extend Repression

Hamdi Firat Buyuk
Sarajevo
BIRN

June 23, 202314:57

Council of Europe report says Turkey’s government uses many tactics to repress its critics abroad – and they include blocking Sweden’s NATO membership bid.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (right) and Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson attend a press conference after their meeting in Ankara, 8 November 2022. Photo: EPA-EFE/NECATI SAVAS

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe’s latest report, “Transnational repression as a growing threat to the rule of law and human rights”, says Turkey employs various strategies to hound its critics abroad, including an attempt to trap Sweden over its NATO membership bid.

“The Assembly specifically calls upon Turkey to end its intimidation of Bulent Kenes, to recognise and respect the decision of the Swedish Supreme Court and curtail its policy of using its veto on Sweden’s membership to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) as a tool of transnational repression,” the report written by Christopher Chope, a British member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, PACE, said.

Kenes was a former editor-in-chief of Today’s Zaman newspaper in Turkey, a paper affiliated with exiled government critic Fethullah Gulen. Following a failed coup attempt in Turkey in 2016, Kenes, like tens of thousands of others, found refuge abroad in Sweden, obtaining political asylum there.

Gulen, a Muslim preacher living in the US, denies any connection with the coup attempt but Ankara defines his network as the “Fethullahist Terrorist Organisation”, or FETO for short, a classification Western countries do not accept.

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government recently pushed Sweden to extradite political refuges including Kenes in return of its approval for its NATO membership bid.

Despite all calls and warnings, Erdogan still has not approved Sweden’s membership bid amidst Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine.

“This behaviour is unacceptable to all those who support the rule of law and serves as an example of the type of pressure which some countries seek to exercise over others to pursue what is essentially another aspect of transnational repression. Even prior to the Turkish Government’s statement a pro-government newspaper had revealed Mr Kenes’s home address and published secretly taken photos in November 2022. Bulent Kenes is one of the founders of the Stockholm Centre for Freedom,” the report added.

Emre Turkut, a postdoctoral researcher at the Hertie School’s Centre for Fundamental Rights in Berlin, said the West should be prepared for autocrats’ unprincipled tactics.

“Erdogan’s pursuit of political interests that undermine human rights in return for Sweden’s NATO membership shows that the right plans must be made against authoritarian regimes. Authoritarian regimes do not have principles. Turkey has already lost its consciousness of being a democratic state that respects human rights,” Turkut told BIRN.

While the CoE report calls on Turkey to stop using Sweden’s NATO membership in its international repression, Turkish members of the PACE objected to the link being made.

“Sweden’s NATO membership is not related to the report. Negotiations for Sweden’s membership continues on the basis of a trilateral memorandum signed by Turkey, Sweden and Finland. Negotiations for Finland’s membership were successfully finalised. Sweden’s membership is expected to be concluded successfully in the near future,” Turkish parliamentarians from Erdogan’s ruling Justice and Development party, AKP, wrote.

Former editor-in-chief of the Turkish daily ‘Cumhuriyet’, Can Dundar, in Berlin, Germany, 28 September 2018. Photo: EPA-EFE/CLEMENS BILAN

Turkey’s strategy to use NATO membership issues forms only part of Erdogan’s government’s campaign to repress critics abroad.

“Reportedly, the number of incidents of physical transnational repression committed since 2014 reached 854 by the end of 2022. These acts were committed by 38 governments in 91 countries around the world. The most prolific perpetrators of transnational repression are, according to the non-governmental organisation Freedom House, the governments of China, Turkey, Russian Federation, Egypt and Tajikistan,” the report added.

Other tactics of Turkey listed by the report include manipulation of Interpol’s red notice system, manipulation of counter-terrorism financing mechanisms as well as renditions.

“The Turkish campaign has been found to rely on renditions, abuse of extradition proceedings, Interpol Red Notices and anti-terror financing measures, and co-opting other States to deport or transfer persons unlawfully,” the report noted, using examples of Kosovo and Moldova from which Turkey brought several Turkish citizens who are alleged members of Gulen’s network.

Turkut said transnational repression is nothing new for Turkey.

“The government has been using different transnational repression tools especially since the 1990s. After 2015, it became a very common systematic,” Turkut said, underlying Turkey’s backward trend in democracy, the rule of law and human rights.

According to Turkut, Turkey uses three major tactics in its transnational repression.

“First, by signing anti-terrorism agreements or security cooperation agreements with the countries it was able to … create… a legal infrastructure for the extradition of wanted dissidents. Secondly, in countries that are usually democratic countries, where this infrastructure could not be provided, legal applications were made for the extradition of the dissidents, and these applications were rejected in many countries such as the UK, the US and Belgium,” Turkut said.

Turkut said the third tactic includes various forms.

“Turkey has used various strategies to conduct a massive transnational repression across borders to supress dissidents. These include passport cancellations, Interpol notices, forced abductions and similar. All of these are fundamentally against human rights,” Turkut added.

According to a Freedom House, quoted by the report, Turkey has so far rendered 58 people including alleged Gulenists, Kurdish fugitives and other critics from 17 countries.

Turkish journalists who live abroad are also specifically hunted by the Turkish government.

“NGOs have also highlighted the role of the Turkish intelligence agency in threats and intimidation of Turkish opposition members and journalists in exile and called on States to prevent any co-operation with the Turkish secret service,” the report underlined, citing the case of a senior Turkish journalist, Can Dundar.

Dundar, then editor-in-chief of the daily Cumhuriyet, left for Germany in June 2016 after being sentenced to prison for leaking national security information.

“Since going into exile, he has faced numerous threats. He and other Turkish journalists in Germany have received protection from German authorities,” the report added.

Travel: Memories of Armenia: The Wings of Tatev


June 28 2023
Memories of Armenia: The Wings of Tatev

By Catherine Tsounis


Who holds the record for Longest non-stop double track cable car in the world? It is in a country struggling to maintain its independence . A poor nation materially, the first Aryans or “Ancient people”, Armenia has the longest reversible aerial tramway built in only one section at the Tatev monastery. Its majestic view is unforgettable.

I remember Tatev because I was the only person of the Holy Martyrs 2018 Pilgrimage who was not warned and drank poisonous juice that landed me in a hospital without adequate plasma. A life experience that had a happy ending, because Father Abraham Malkhasyan sang an Armenian religious hymn, blessing me at the hospital. It was destiny for me to experience all, overcome and remember “The Wings of Tatev” in 2023. Every traveler has an experience that changed their life. Seeing historic Armenia helped me appreciate my Greek heritage. It is the longest reversible aerial tramway built in only one section the Aegean and Western Anatolia because of the courageous Orthodox Armenian people, the backbone of the Byzantine education, spiritual and military establishments.

Flying over the gorge located at the Syunik region, south of Yerevan, presented a once in a lifetime view. The manufacturer is the Doppelmayr/Garaventa Group of Austria/Switzerland. In the middle of nowhere, the Caucasus mountains, one sees Western technology. “The Wings of Tatev” was built within the framework of the Tatev Revival Project. The project was conceived by Ruben Vardanyan and Veronika Zonabend. The aerial tramway was officially launched on 16 October 2010., where it set the Guinness World Record for the longest non-stop reversible aerial tramway.1

The Tatev Gateway is noncommercial. It has one goal: the restoration of Tatev Monastery and the development of the local community. – Tatev, that means “give wings.”2 Flying across the gorge was like having wings.

Special appreciation to Rev. Dr. Abraham Malkhasyan of Holy Martyrs Apostolic Armenian Church in Bayside, NY, the Pilgrimage leader Aram Ciamician and photographer Lara Ciamician, Zarmi Megherian and Armenian mentors scholar Mardo Anastasian and community activist Carol Anastasian.

Reference:

1. st1yle=”margin:0px auto 26px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.6″>2. st1yle=”margin:0px auto 26px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.6″>https://hellenicnews.com/memories-of-armenia-the-wings-of-tatev/

New Book Traces Origins of Armenian Immigration to U.S.

“A Kaleidoscope of Armenian Immigration to America: Origins of a Modern Diaspora” book cover


Social historian, Gary A. Kulhanjian’s latest book, titled “A Kaleidoscope of Armenian Immigration to America: Origins of a Modern Diaspora,” has been published.

Kulhanjian was born to Armenian immigrant parents and raised in New York City later Teaneck, New Jersey. He now lives in California with his family. His maternal grandmother lived in Fresno, California for many years.

Kulhanjian is a retired educator who taught at the secondary and collegiate levels in several institutions. His publications include: introductions of other books, articles, book reviews, journal entries and encyclopedia entries, and in other sources. He holds three degrees in higher education.

The saga of the Armenian immigrants’ experience connects them to the mainstream of American civilization with other groups who sought refuge and opportunities in America. The book reveals different patterns of a kaleidoscope in time frames they created a new diaspora.

The scope of the book is made up of a Forward written by retired New York State Judge Michael Boyajian. The book includes: the Introduction, seven Chapters, Appendix, and other features. Each chapter has Notes which synthesize the length of research for the volume. It took five years to write and decades of research. The book is unique for several reasons which are noteworthy since it can be listed under several titles as a history, social science, ethnic studies, and immigration. Suffice it to say, it is a subject which overall can be manifested under American or Armenian studies.

The information in the book is gathered from primary and secondary sources. Beside the sources mentioned the material was researched online for documentation from internet materials. The author includes interviews with many living immigrants and/or their descendants. Some of the sample questions are also included which were asked of immigrants and descendants. In some cases, immigrants were taped during the question- and- answer interviews. The author selected several photos of his family and extended family. Some well-known and not well-known Armenian immigrants are also in the photo section of the book.

Three chapters do not appear in similar books about the Armenian immigrants. They are titled: “Old Ships And Odyssey Of Transoceanic Travel,” “Diversity Of Armenian Immigrants,” and “An Untold Testimonial Story.”

The story of ships is about old and new ships which many Armenians traveled on emigrating from several ports. The difficulties of travel and hardships they endured is synthesized along with old and new studies which were included here. In the diversity of the immigrants’ chapter, the author emphasizes the type of work occupations and who specific immigrants were upon their arrival. The chapter about the untold testimonial pertains to Kulhanjian’s family and their escape from death after many on his paternal side and maternal side did not escape the Armenian Genocide. Some arrived over one hundred years ago. Those relatives who survived were able to find some solace and security in America. It is a case study for many, and every Armenian has a story of their family’s experience emigrating from the Ottoman Empire and elsewhere. Two of his relatives wrote brief essays of their fathers who were survivors of the Armenian Genocide and were the Kulhanjian brothers.

Another case study, readers can find informative is that of a “mail-order bride,” who came to America after her family was extirpated in the Armenian Genocide. The author discusses other sources on the subject also. He interviewed the Armenian woman in her later years, and she gave him documents about her experience.

In reading the book, he uses chronology in parts of the text; however, he primarily relies on a thematic approach of the material that is written about. The volume includes Armenian American scholars and others who have done research on immigrants and immigration not just about Armenians. He incorporates other minorities, and their experiences in coming to America and living in a new environment. He believes there are parallels and differences of various groups. He also draws from the body of research on studies made about Armenians. Some historians think Armenians had little in common with other groups and others believe they did.

Some immigrants, who were not interviewed but written about, were found in the research. The interviewees were quite extraordinary to Kulhanjian. However, the last chapter done in a chronological format of mini-biographies pertaining to dozens of biographies researched for the book. The impact of the personal interviewees was more emotional for the author. Kulhanjian thinks at present his volume in the English language is one of longest studies on Armenian immigration to America. The Armenian experience is a manifestation of history, like other immigrants, which solidified them to the story of American civilization in a modern diaspora.

Armenpress: Azerbaijani military again spreads fake news, warns Armenian ministry of defense

 09:34,

YEREVAN, JUNE 29, ARMENPRESS. Azerbaijan has again falsely accused the Armenian Armed Forces of opening fire at their military positions on the border in a renewed disinformation campaign, the Ministry of Defense of Armenia warned Thursday.

“The statement disseminated by the Ministry of Defence of Azerbaijan as if on June 28 from 10:35 p.m. to 11:15 p.m. the units of the Armenian Armed Forces opened fire against the Azerbaijani combat positions located in the eastern and southwestern parts of the border is disinformation,” the Ministry of Defense of Armenia said in a statement.

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 06/20/2023

                                        Tuesday, 
Belarus Leader Says Armenia’s Discontent With CSTO ‘Justified’
        • Heghine Buniatian
Belarus - Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko visits a military-industrial 
complex facility in the Minsk Region, June 13, 2023.
Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko on Tuesday urged the Russian-led 
Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) to address serious security 
concerns of Armenia and other CSTO member states.
Armenian leaders have repeatedly accused Russia and other ex-Soviet states 
making up the alliance of not fulfilling their obligation to defend Armenia 
against Azerbaijani attacks. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian threatened last 
month to pull his country out of the alliance “if we conclude that the CSTO has 
left Armenia.”
Lukashenko said the CSTO is “very often” rightly criticized by its member states 
as he addressed the foreign ministers of Russia, Belarus, Armenia, Kazakhstan, 
Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan who gathered in Minsk for a regular session.
“For instance, Kyrgyzstan has been asking us to help settle the border conflict 
with Tajikistan,” he said. “Very justified complaints -- and there is sometimes 
no question about that -- are presented to us by Armenia.”
“I won’t comment on whether or not these complaints are justified,” he went on 
after a pause. “But I will say that problems do exist and they are very serious 
problems. Unless we address these problems, we will always rebuke each other, 
express dissatisfaction with the overall functioning of the organization.”
“Therefore, no matter how we twist or turn, we need to also dive into problems 
facing CSTO members Armenia, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan,” Lukashenko added, 
warning that failure to do so could deepen what he called Western interference 
in conflicts in the former Soviet Union.
The remarks contrasted with Lukashenko’s earlier statements on Armenia’s 
conflict with Azerbaijan. As recently as last October, the long-serving 
strongman bluntly opposed any CSTO intervention in the conflict. Azerbaijan is 
not an adversary of Belarus and its President Ilham Aliyev is “totally our guy,” 
he said, sparking a fresh war of words between Yerevan and Minsk.
Lukashenko, who has a warm personal rapport with Aliyev, had repeatedly raised 
eyebrows in Armenia in the past with his pro-Azerbaijani statements and arms 
supplies to Baku.
Armenian Defense Chief Again Visits France
France - French Armed Forces Minister Sebastien Lecornu (right) meets Armenian 
Defense Minister Suren Papikian, Paris, .
Armenia’s Defense Minister Suren Papikian met with his French counterpart 
Sebastien Lecornu in Paris on Tuesday for further talks on closer military ties 
between their countries.
The Armenian Defense Ministry said the two men discussed “the current state of 
implementation of understandings” reached by them during Papikian’s previous 
trip to France that took place last September. Security in the South Caucasus 
was also on the agenda of the talks, the ministry said without giving details.
France’s Armed Forces Ministry did not immediately issue a statement on the 
talks.
Papikian’s September trip to Paris came in the wake of large-scale fighting on 
the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. He met with Lecornu the day after French 
President Emmanuel Macron received Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian. Macron blamed 
Azerbaijan for the hostilities and said Azerbaijani forces must “return to their 
initial positions.”
A delegation of French defense officials visited Armenia in October, holding 
separate talks with Papikian, Armenian army chief Eduard Asrian and 
High-Technology Minister Robert Khachatrian. The Defense Ministry in Yerevan 
likewise said at the time that they discussed the implementation of Papikian’s 
and Lecornu’s “understandings.”
No details of those agreements have been made public so far. It remains unclear 
whether France, which is regularly accused by Azerbaijan of making pro-Armenian 
statements, is ready to provide any military assistance to Armenia.
“We certainly support the peace talks that have started with Azerbaijan, but 
France must help Armenia to defend and protect itself!” Christian Cambon, the 
chairman of the French Senate’s committee on defense and foreign affairs, 
tweeted after meeting with Papikian on Monday.
The Armenian minister attended the opening ceremony of the Paris Airshow earlier 
on Monday.
Pashinian Again Defends Handling Of Karabakh War
        • Ruzanna Stepanian
NAGORNO-KARABAKH -- Bursts of explosions are seen from Stepanakert during 
fighting between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces near Shushi (Susa), November 5, 
2020
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian on Tuesday again defended his handling of the 
2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh, effectively shifting blame for its outcome onto 
Armenia’s top military brass.
Pashinian admitted that he could have stopped the war in Nagorno-Karabakh three 
weeks before the Armenian-Armenian ceasefire brokered by Russia on November 9, 
2020. He claimed that he rejected an earlier truce accord because it was even 
less favorable for the Armenian side.
Pashinian made the comments as he publicly testified before an ad hoc commission 
of the Armenian parliament amid continuing statements by opposition politicians 
and other critics holding him primarily responsible for Azerbaijan’s victory in 
the six-week war that left at least 3,800 Armenian soldiers dead.
The commission, boycotted by opposition lawmakers, was set up last year with the 
stated aim of examining the causes of Armenia’s defeat, assessing the Armenian 
government’s and military’s actions and looking into what had been done for 
national defense before the hostilities. It has since questioned dozens of 
current and former government officials as well as military officers. All of 
them except Pashinian testified behind the closed doors.
In a joint statement released on Monday, the two opposition alliances 
represented in the National Assembly described Pashinian’s upcoming testimony as 
a political “show” which they said is aimed at whitewashing his wartime 
incompetence and disastrous decision making.
Opposition leaders have said, among other things, that the Armenian side would 
have lost less territory and suffered fewer casualties had Pashinian agreed to 
Azerbaijan’s terms of a ceasefire communicated through Moscow on October 19-20, 
2020.
Russian President Vladimir Putin made similar claims on November 17, 2020 one 
week after the ceasefire brokered by him stopped the hostilities. Putin said 
that under the October 20 deal proposed by him and accepted by Baku, the 
Armenian side would have retained control over the strategic Karabakh town of 
Shushi (Shusha) in return for agreeing to the return of Azerbaijanis who had 
lived there.
Pashinian again claimed on Tuesday that the return of the Azerbaijani refugees 
would have restored Azerbaijani control of Shushi because “they were supposed to 
have a separate road connecting Shushi to Azerbaijan.”
“This means without exaggeration that it was about handing over Shushi to 
Azerbaijan,” he told the panel comprising only members of his Civil Contract 
party.
Armenia - Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian testifies before a parliament 
commission, .
Pashinian further declared that the October 2020 deal rejected by him also 
called for an extraterritorial corridor that would connect Azerbaijan to its 
Nakhichevan exclave through Armenia’s Syunik province.
Putin did not mention such a provision in his November 2020 interview with the 
Rossiya-24 TV channel.
“Prime Minister Pashinian told me openly that he viewed [the return of 
Azerbaijanis to Shushi] as a threat to the interests of Armenia and 
Nagorno-Karabakh,” he said at the time. “I do not quite understand the essence 
of this hypothetical threat. I mean, it was about the return of civilians to 
their homes, while the Armenian side was to have retained control over this 
section of Nagorno-Karabakh, including Shusha.”
Shushi was captured by Azerbaijani forces three days before the subsequent truce 
agreement halted the war. Azerbaijan agreed to stop its military operations in 
return for an Armenian pledge to withdraw from three districts around Karabakh. 
Baku regained control over four other districts, which had been occupied by 
Karabakh Armenian forces in the early 1990s, during the 2020 war.
Pashinian appeared to blame the Armenian army’s General Staff for the fall of 
Shushi, saying that it falsely denied reports about Azerbaijani troops closing 
in on the Karabakh town overlooking Stepanakert. He said he was taken aback when 
the then General Staff chief, Onik Gasparian, informed him on November 7, 2020 
that it was captured by Azerbaijani forces.
“This was tough news for me because in all my conversations, instructions, 
orders, consultations, I had said that Shushi should be kept and I had received 
assurances that it will be kept,” he said.
Gasparian appeared before the parliamentary commission last month. His long 
testimony has not been publicized.
The army top brass led by Gasparian accused Pashinian of incompetence and 
demanded his government’s resignation in a February 2021 statement. Pashinian 
rejected the demand as a coup attempt before sacking the general.
U.S.-Armenian Joint Venture ‘Undeterred’ By Azeri Gunfire
        • Artak Khulian
Armenia - The site of a metallurgical plant constructed in Yeraskh, June 15, 
2023.
Representatives of a U.S.-Armenian joint venture said on Tuesday that it will 
continue to build a metallurgical plant in an Armenian border village despite 
systematic gunfire from nearby Azerbaijani army positions.
The construction site in Yeraskh, a village 55 kilometers south of Yerevan, has 
come under cross-border fire on a virtually daily basis for the past week amid 
heightened tensions at various sections of the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. Two 
Indian nationals working there were seriously wounded on June 14.
The U.S. State Department expressed serious concern over the “gunfire from the 
direction of Azerbaijan” targeting the “U.S.-affiliated company.” And several 
dozen foreign diplomats, including the Yerevan-based ambassadors of France, 
Germany and China, made a point of visiting Yeraskh on June 15. Nevertheless, 
Azerbaijani troops stationed less than one kilometer from the under-construction 
plant continued to shoot at it in the following days, according to local 
residents.
In a show of defiance, the joint venture set up by an Armenian investor and GTB 
Steel, a company registered in Sri Lanka and reportedly owned by a U.S. citizen, 
hoisted Armenian and U.S. flags at the construction site on Tuesday. Its chief 
executive, Tiran Hakobian, said it is thus making clear that “we will not go 
anywhere from here and will continue the plant’s construction.”
“We will carry on with the works regardless of whether or not they will shoot at 
us,” Hakobian told reporters. “At some point, they [the Azerbaijanis] will 
understand that we will not leave and will not play by those rules of the game.”
According to the Armenian Defense Ministry, Azerbaijani forces again opened fire 
at the Yeraskh site late in afternoon, hours after the flag hoisting ceremony. 
Baku denied that.
The investors have pledged to invest $70 million in the project and create as 
many as 1,000 jobs in the rural community.
The Azerbaijani government protested against the project one week before the 
outbreak of the daily gunfire. It claimed that building the industrial facility 
without its permission is a violation of international environmental norms.
Yerevan brushed aside that claim. The Armenian Foreign Ministry said last week 
that Baku’s “false concerns” are a smokescreen for impeding economic growth and 
foreign investment in Armenia.
Armenia’s largest gold mine also located on the border with Azerbaijan was 
likewise targeted by systematic Azerbaijani gunfire this spring. The Russian 
owner of the Sotk gold mine announced earlier this month that it has no choice 
but to end open-pit mining operations there and put many of its 700 workers on 
unpaid leave.
Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

Meta Oversight Board upholds decision to leave Armenian POW video on Facebook

June 14 2023
 14 June 2023

Footage alleged to show injured Armenian soldiers being captured by their Azerbaijani counterparts will remain on Facebook, after Meta’s Oversight Board decided to uphold an earlier decision by the company.

The video, which was published on Facebook in October 2022, was not removed from the platform at the time despite violating Facebook’s Coordinating Harm and Promoting Crime Community Standard. Meta, Facebook’s parent company, cited the video’s newsworthiness and argued that public interest in seeing the content outweighed the risk to the captured soldiers’ safety and dignity. 

Meta’s Oversight Board launched an investigation into the case in March of this year. 

The video was not widely shared following its publication on the platform, and it remains unclear whether it remains on Facebook or has since been taken down.

According to Meta, the video was published on a page which identified itself as documenting Azerbaijani war crimes committed against Armenians in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, and appeared to show prisoners of war being captured.

‘The video shows people who appear to be Azerbaijani soldiers searching through rubble. The video has been edited so that their faces cannot be seen. They find people in the rubble who are described in the caption as Armenian soldiers. Some appear to be injured, others appear dead. They pull one solider [sic] from the rubble, who cries out in pain. His face is visible and he appears injured’, the description of the video by the board read.

The video reportedly ends with an unseen person berating an injured soldier sitting on the ground in Russian and Turkish.

The video was published less than a month after the September 2022 Two-Day War between Armenia and Azerbaijan, which took place within Armenia, and resulted in Azerbaijan gaining territories and the two sides losing around two hundred soldiers in total.

In the weeks following the conflict, footage appearing to show Azerbaijani soldiers committing war crimes appeared online, including the mutilation of female soldiers and the execution of a group of Armenian soldiers.

Graphic evidence of war crimes in the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict has in recent years frequently been published online, especially on platforms such as Telegram, which exercise little control over the content published. In some cases those posting celebrate the pictured actions, while others share the footage to discredit the other side. 

A number of Telegram channels were created during the September fighting, sharing images and video of dead and wounded Armenian soldiers, as well as Armenian prisoners of war. 

Tuesday’s decision by Meta’s Oversight Board found that Meta ‘correctly applied the newsworthiness allowance’ in deciding to allow the video to remain on Facebook, while adding a ‘mark as disturbing’ warning screen to it. 

‘These decisions were consistent with Meta’s values and human rights responsibilities’, the decision reads.

The text of the decision also notes that it sets a precedent for Meta, raising ‘important questions’ about Meta’s content moderation in conflict situations, particularly in relation to revealing the identities and locations of prisoners of war. 

While the decision notes that such footage could expose those pictured to immediate harm, it adds that it can also contribute to public debate and raise awareness of ‘violations of international human rights and international humanitarian law’. 

‘It can also build momentum for action that protects rights and ensures accountability’, the board stated. ‘Meta did not have evidence that videos of this kind were producing […] negative effects but did see evidence that international organisations were using such videos to increase pressure on Azerbaijan to end mistreatment of prisoners of war.’

The Board’s decision was largely welcomed by Armenian media experts. Some, however, expressed concerns about the psychological effects of such content and its use in ‘hybrid’ warfare. 

‘I still think that the video should not be allowed on the platform, as it constitutes information war against the Armenian society’, cyber security expert Artur Papyan wrote on Twitter. However, he described the board’s counter-arguments as ‘valid’ and deemed the judgement a ‘balanced’ one, especially in the context of similar cases in Ukraine and elsewhere. 

https://oc-media.org/meta-oversight-board-upholds-decision-to-leave-armenian-pow-video-on-facebook/

Armenia should seek BRICS observer status, says analyst

 11:34,

YEREVAN, JUNE 17, ARMENPRESS. Armenia should consider joining BRICS as an observer in the initial phase and get involved in regional mega projects, according to analyst Mher Sahakyan.

Speaking to ARMENPRESS, the analyst and expert on China said that although Armenia can’t be compared with BRICS countries in terms of its opportunities and size of the economy, it should nevertheless seek to gain an observer status in the organization in order to be present in multilateral relations, to be involved in the markets of the member states.

Four BRICS members have embassies in Armenia, and Russia – one of the main actors in BRICS – is Armenia’s main strategic ally, Sahakyan said.

The Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov had said that nearly 20 countries are seeking to get BRICS membership.

BRICS is an association of five regional economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. All five states are members of the G20. The BRICS were originally identified for the purpose of highlighting investment opportunities and had not been a formal intergovernmental organization.

“We are now in a multipolar world order where BRICS is carrying out its important work. This platform was created for discussing geopolitical and global economic issues and finding mutually beneficial solutions, because it has brought together countries that don’t agree with the approaches of the West and are trying to have their independent policy. It’s no coincidence that countries which already have certain influence in their region such as Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Egypt want to join the organization,” Sahakyan said.

Nonetheless, some of the BRICS countries continue to closely cooperate with the U.S., for example India, which is both a BRICS member and a Quad group member, with the latter being mostly comprised of China rivals – the U.S., Japan and Australia. Recently India also rejected the NATO+ platform, refusing to take anti-Russia steps.

“Nevertheless, BRICS is not an alliance, the members seek to be independent actors. These are no longer the countries against which the U.S. can use the carrot and stick policy. Particularly China has powerful levers capable of imposing corresponding sanctions against the American side in response to sanctions imposed against it. After all, BRICS is an arena enabling developed countries to counter the U.S. by bypassing the ban on cooperating with Russia and China. Several African countries who don’t want to get cut off from such a circle are also displaying such conduct,” he said.

Lawmaker rules out extraterritorial corridor through Armenia

 13:14,

YEREVAN, JUNE 14, ARMENPRESS. Armenia will never negotiate around providing a corridor to Azerbaijan through its territory, a lawmaker said Wednesday.

Sargis Khandanyan, the Chair of the Parliamentary Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters that the topic on the “Zangezur corridor” wording is closed for Armenia.

“The topic of the made up “Zangezur corridor” wording is closed for the Republic of Armenia. This is obvious, as well as acceptable and understandable also for the parties who are mediating in the negotiations,” he said, ruling out a corridor through Armenia’s territory. He said Armenia will never negotiate around such issue.

Khandanyan added that Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s statements cause concern because they aren’t conducive to the negotiations process.

Customs duties from EEU budget drop, says Armenian finance minister

 16:00, 5 June 2023

YEREVAN, JUNE 5, ARMENPRESS. In 2022 Armenia received 28 billion dram less from the Eurasian Economic Union’s (EEU) single customs budget compared to 2021, finance minister Vahe Hovhannisyan said on June 5.

Hovhannisyan told lawmakers at a joint committee hearing on the 2022 budget report that a decrease has been recorded in terms of customs duties from the EEU.

“Customs duties dropped 56 billion 685 million drams, which is 28 billion dram less than in 2021. In 2021 that amount stood at 84 billion 839 million drams. This is due to the decrease of overall imports in the entire EEU market in 2022,” Hovhannisyan said.