Germany to provide necessary assistance to forcibly displaced persons from Karabakh, says German official

 19:01,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 22, ARMENPRESS. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan received Niels Annen, Parliamentary State Secretary at the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development of Germany.

The Prime Minister expressed satisfaction with the resumption of the negotiations on Armenian-German development cooperation, which had not happened since 2014. Nikol Pashinyan highlighted the inclusion of Armenia in the framework of the "BMZ-2030" reform strategy by the German government. According to the Prime Minister, recently a new dynamic has been recorded in the relations between the two countries, there is a great potential to expand cooperation and the Armenian government is interested in fully realizing it, the Prime Minister’s Office said in a readout.

Niels Annen noted that the resumption of the Armenian-German intergovernmental negotiations is a conscious decision of the German government, taking into account the steps and reforms aimed at the development and strengthening of democracy in Armenia.

 Mr. Annen added that within the framework of the "BMZ-2030" reform strategy, it is planned to implement projects with Armenia in the areas of economic promotion, energy, vocational education, tourism and other directions. According to the Parliamentary State Secretary at the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development of Germany, the above-mentioned programs will contribute to increasing the interest of German companies to operate in Armenia.

The humanitarian problems of more than 100,000 forcibly displaced people from Nagorno-Karabakh as a result of Azerbaijan's ethnic cleansing policy, as well as the steps taken by the Armenian government to overcome them were discussed.

Niels Annen noted that he had a meeting with people forcibly displaced from Nagorno-Karabakh in Ararat region and added that the German government is preparing to provide the necessary assistance to contribute to the solution of existing problems.

The sides exchanged ideas on the processes taking place in the region.




Genocide Education in the 21st Century: “Rebuilding the Ship While Sailing on the Water”

“Where Do We Go From Here? Genocide Education in the 21st Century” Symposium at Rowan University, New Jersey

TORONTO—On November 10, 2023, the International Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies (A Division of the Zoryan Institute) and the Rowan Center for the Study of Holocaust, Genocide, and Human Rights, hosted the symposium, Where Do We Go From Here? Genocide Education in the 21st Century at Rowan University in New Jersey.

Over the past few years, the editors of Genocide Studies International (GSI), an academic journal owned, operated and sponsored by the Zoryan Institute and published by the University of Toronto Press (UTP), started questioning the effectiveness of genocide education today, given the prevalence of human rights abuses, the polarization of societies, and the global rise in hate-based violence, authoritarianism, and a general apathy from the international community. To address this question, the editors conceptualized a symposium to bring together leading scholars and educators of North America in the field of Genocide Studies to discuss the shortcomings of genocide education, what “good” genocide education means, and how we can begin to chart a path forward.

From l-r: Dr. Alex Alvarez, Dr. Arthur Anyaduba, Dr. Joyce Apsel, Dr. Deborah Dwork (front), Dr. Jim Waller, Dr. Jennifer Rich (front), Dr. Björn Krondorfer, Kate Simola, Megan Reid, Dr. Khatchig Mouradian and Dr. Henry Theriault

With the troubling times we face globally today, including the invasion of Ukraine, the blockade of the Berdzor (Lachin) Corridor and dissolution of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh), the Gaza conflict, the civil war in Libya and the mass killings in Darfur, just to name a few, the timing for this symposium could not have been any more poignant. The ability to be able to make sense of, understand and critically analyze the world around us has never been more crucial.

Quality education is at the center of this, and this symposium acted as a starting point to opening important discussions surrounding these issues in a closed, safe space with some of the leading voices in genocide education.

The primary objective of genocide education has been commonly perceived as a means of raising awareness about the heinous crime in order to mobilize masses to help prevent genocides and atrocities of the future. Yet, despite the efforts of scholars, educators and academic institutions like the Zoryan Institute, the famous saying of “never again” has proven to be an empty slogan.

“Learning about genocide doesn’t have a moral or political advantage, it rather helps us understand the world around us differently.”

Prof. Deborah Dwork, Director of the Center for the Study of the Holocaust, Genocide, and Crimes Against Humanity at the Graduate Center at CUNY, opened the day’s discussion by situating the symposium and the conversation in a post-October 7 world. She highlighted the need to explore and perhaps redefine what the actual goals of genocide education are, noting that if the objective with this education thus far has been prevention, then education is clearly failing. Dr. Dwork commented: “Learning about genocide doesn’t have a moral or political advantage, it rather helps us understand the world around us differently.”

Dr. Joyce Apsel, Academic Board Member of the Zoryan Institute, Course Director of the Institute’s Genocide and Human Rights University Program (GHRUP), and Professor of Humanities in Liberal Studies at New York University, discussed the need for genocide education to be studied through a human rights lens, which she framed as “human rights” and “human rights wrongs.” Prof. Apsel also raised the need to avoid framing genocide as a singular event, but as a process that continues to impact societies long after the height of the violence ends.

Dr. Jim Waller, a faculty member of GHRUP and the Dodd Chair in Human Rights Practice at the University of Connecticut, cemented this notion by stating that the word “post-genocide” should be removed from the academic vocabulary, as there is no clear end date to the impacts of genocide.

Other key takeaways from the symposium included the importance of considering the positionality of the educator, the significance of introducing genocide education across various disciplines, and ways to garner empathy from students and make genocide education hit closer to home.

Prof. Jennifer Rich, Academic Board Member of the Zoryan Institute and co-editor of GSI, and the Director of the Masters of Arts in Holocaust and Genocide Education, was the lead coordinator and the moderator for the symposium. When asked about the key take-aways of the symposium, she said: “The rich exchange of ideas that took place at the symposium was an important, exciting first step. I am certain that there will be any number of followup conversations as we grapple with our core question of, ‘Where do we go from here?’”

Reflecting on the discussions had and the daunting task ahead of improving the future of genocide education, Dr. Adam Muller, co-editor of GSI and the Director of the Peace and Conflict Studies graduate programs at the University of Manitoba, quoted notable author Willard Van Orman Quine, stating that we are “rebuilding the ship while sailing on the water.” This quote seems to perfectly summarize the position we are in today, addressing present day turmoil while simultaneously needing to repair genocide education, or “the ship,” without being able to fully tear it down and start anew.

In reflecting on the symposium, the Zoryan Institute is currently confronting the following foundational questions for its own work: How do we effectively address major conflicts within classrooms and public forums while navigating the complexities of censorship and potential repercussions for open discourse? How has the failure of the international community to prevent human rights atrocities, and the indifference for these crimes, shaped how we approach genocide education going forward? How are we able to rebuild the ship, while keeping the boat afloat during turbulent waters?

From l-r: Dr. Henry Theriault, Dr. Deborah Dwork, Dr. Arthur Anyaduba, Dr. Joyce Apsel, Dr. Jennifer Rich, Dr. Jim Waller, Dr. Björn Krondorfer, Dr. Khatchig Mouradian

This symposium will act as the first of many discussions on this topic as we grapple with the big overarching questions that were left unanswered. While exploring these fundamental questions, and others raised during the symposium, the Institute questions whether it should redirect its objectives for its work from prevention, towards promoting equity, tolerance, understanding and reconciliation through education, scholarship and research.

All eight panelists will prepare academic papers to be featured in an upcoming special issue of GSI, which is expected to be released in Fall 2024.

Zoryan Institute and its subsidiary, the International Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies, is a non-profit organization that serves the cause of scholarship and public awareness relating to issues of universal human rights, genocide, and diaspora-homeland relations. This is done through the systematic continued efforts of scholars and specialists using a comparative and multidisciplinary approach and in accordance with the highest academic standards.


RFE/RL Armenian Service – 11/22/2023

Wednesday, 
Armenia Signals Readiness ‘To Reengage’ In Peace Process After Azerbaijan’s 
‘Direct Talks’ Offer
The Armenian Foreign Ministry building in Yerevan (file photo)
Armenia has reaffirmed its readiness to “re-engage in negotiations” with 
Azerbaijan to establish peace between the two countries, its Foreign Ministry 
said on Wednesday in response to Baku’s offer of “direct talks” with Yerevan. Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry called on November 21 for direct negotiations with 
Armenia in a “mutually acceptable” venue, including at the Armenian-Azerbaijani 
border. Baku’s call came after what appears to be Baku’s rejection of Western mediation 
efforts in the process of settling relations with Armenia. It also followed the announcement by Armenia’s Foreign Ministry that Yerevan had 
submitted another proposal on a peace agreement to Azerbaijan following Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian’s call on November 18 for “intensifying diplomatic 
efforts to achieve the signing of a peace treaty.”
In its statement today the Armenian Foreign Ministry emphasized that official 
Yerevan is ready to re-engage in negotiations, having as a benchmark “mutual 
recognition and respect for each other’s territorial integrity without 
ambiguities, implementation of the further border delimitation based on the 
[1991] Alma-Ata Declaration and the latest legitimate Soviet maps, the 
unblocking of the region’s infrastructures based on the principles of full 
respect for the sovereignty, jurisdiction, reciprocity and equality of the 
states.”
It said that “despite all the complications and challenges” official Yerevan 
sees “a real possibility of establishing peace between the two countries, which 
can be realized if there is political will on both sides, and the Armenian side 
has that will.”
The Armenian ministry stressed that “one of the expressions of this will is also 
the fact that Armenia proposed to Azerbaijan to hold a meeting of border 
delimitation commissions on the state frontier between the two countries.”
Earlier, Azerbaijan accused Armenia of delaying its reply to Baku’s proposal on 
a peace agreement submitted to Yerevan in September for more than two months. Stressing that Yerevan submitted its sixth proposal related to the draft peace 
agreement to Baku on November 21, the Armenian Foreign Ministry said: “While, 
after receiving the latest Azerbaijani proposals, Armenia was considering them 
and was ready to continue negotiations on the draft agreement, on September 19 
Azerbaijan carried out a large-scale military attack against the people of 
Nagorno-Karabakh, which led to the forced displacement of the entire Armenian 
population of Nagorno-Karabakh.”
The Azerbaijani leadership appeared to be avoiding meetings with the Armenian 
side held with Western mediation after Baku established full control over 
Nagorno-Karabakh in the one-day lightening offensive in September. Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev and Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian 
were scheduled to meet on the sidelines of the EU’s October 5 summit in Granada, 
Spain, for talks mediated by French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor 
Olaf Scholz, and European Council President Charles Michel. Pashinian had hoped that they would sign there a document laying out the main 
parameters of an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty. However, Aliyev withdrew 
from the talks at the last minute. Baku cited France’s allegedly “biased position” against Azerbaijan as the reason 
for skipping those talks in Spain. The Azerbaijani leader also appears to have canceled another meeting which the 
EU’s Michel planned to host in Brussels in late October. Most recently Azerbaijan refused to attend a meeting with Armenia at the level 
of foreign ministers in Washington after allegedly “one-sided and biased” 
remarks by a senior U.S. official made during a congressional hearing on 
Nagorno-Karabakh. That meeting had reportedly been scheduled to take place on 
November 20. The Armenian ministry also stressed today that the Azerbaijani side did not 
participate in the meetings at the level of the countries’ leaders first in 
Granada and then in Brussels. It said that “those five-way and three-way meetings had previously been agreed 
upon, and Yerevan considered it to be more efficient to present [its latest 
proposals] to Azerbaijan during those meetings.”
“Nevertheless, in order to prevent attempts to deadlock the negotiation process 
and achieve lasting peace in our region, the Republic of Armenia constructively 
conveyed its observations on the [draft] agreement,” the statement said. Armenia ‘Inclined’ To Continue Talks With Azerbaijan Through EU Mediation
        • Astghik Bedevian
European Council President Charles Michel hosts talks between Armenian Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in Brussels, May 
14, 2023. Yerevan is inclined to continue talks between the leaders of Armenia and 
Azerbaijan in the Brussels format, through the mediation of President of the 
European Council Charles Michel, an ally of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian in parliament said on Wednesday. Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry called on November 21 for direct negotiations with 
Armenia in a “mutually acceptable” venue, including at the Armenian-Azerbaijani 
border. Baku’s call came after what appears to be Baku’s rejection of Western mediation 
efforts in the process of normalizing relations with Armenia. Responding to the statement from Baku, Armenia’s Foreign Ministry today 
reaffirmed Yerevan’s readiness to “re-engage in negotiations” with Baku to 
establish peace between the two South Caucasus nations. In particular, it mentioned a possible meeting at the state frontier of Armenian 
and Azerbaijani members of commissions involved in border delimitation and 
demarcation processes, something that it said Yerevan had already proposed 
earlier. The Armenian ministry stopped short, however, of mentioning the 
possibility of direct Armenian-Azerbaijani talks at the highest level. Sargis Khandanian, who represents the pro-government Civil Contract faction and 
heads the Armenian National Assembly’s Foreign Relations Commission, told 
RFE/RL’s Armenian Service today that the main principles for 
Armenian-Azerbaijani normalization, including mutual recognition of territorial 
integrity and borders based on a 1991 declaration signed by a dozen former 
Soviet republics, including Armenia and Azerbaijan, after the collapse of the 
USSR, and the sovereign jurisdictions of the states over transportation links 
passing through their territories, were agreed upon by the parties in July when 
the latest round of EU-mediated talks was held between Pashinian and Azerbaijani 
President Ilham Aliyev. “Based on this logic, it is necessary to ensure the continuity of those 
negotiations and continue meetings at the level of the countries’ leaders 
through the mediation of the European Union, in particular, European Council 
President Charles Michel,” Khandanian said. “But we saw that Azerbaijan rejected both meetings that were scheduled in 
Granada and Brussels. Nevertheless, Armenia continues to adhere to this logic 
and wants to achieve settlement within this framework,” the pro-government 
Armenian lawmaker said. A member of the Armenian opposition, meanwhile, pointed to dangers in 
Azerbaijan’s offer. Armen Rustamian from the Hayastan faction said that by 
boycotting Western platforms Aliyev wants to achieve face-to-face meetings or 
meetings through Russia’s mediation “in order to get what he wants” under the 
2020 Moscow-brokered ceasefire agreement for Nagorno-Karabakh, namely, a land 
corridor to Azerbaijan’s western exclave of Nakhichevan via Armenia. “He has already got what he needed from the West and he doesn’t have any 
problems there. That’s why he says: if you want to continue calling me to the 
West with your logic, I won’t come. Your alternative is either to return to the 
field of the [Moscow-brokered] trilateral agreements or we negotiate face to 
face,” Rustamian said. Germany Announces Aid To Armenia
Parliamentary State Secretary at Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic 
Cooperation and Development Niels Annen (L) and Armenia’s Minister of Economy 
Vahan Kerobian at a joint press conference in Yerevan. . The government in Berlin will provide 84.6 million euros (about $92.2 million) 
in aid to Armenia in the form of grants and loans, a German official announced 
on Wednesday. Speaking at a joint press conference with Armenia’s Minister of Economy Vahan 
Kerobian in Yerevan, Parliamentary State Secretary at Germany’s Federal Ministry 
for Economic Cooperation and Development Niels Annen said that “it is a clear 
message to the whole world that Germany and Armenia are opening a new way of 
cooperation.”
“Armenia has once again proven that it is committed to democracy, a democratic 
society,” the German official stressed. The announcement came after two-day intergovernmental negotiations focused on 
developing Armenian-German cooperation that were held in Yerevan on November 
21-22. Earlier this week, the United States announced more than $4.1 million in 
additional humanitarian assistance for Armenians affected by the situation in 
Nagorno-Karabakh. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), through which the 
assistance will be provided, said that this funding will increase “life-saving 
food assistance and provide humanitarian protection and emergency shelter” for 
almost 74,000 out of more than 100,000 Armenians displaced from Nagorno-Karabakh 
after Azerbaijan’s military operation in September. It said that the additional funding brings total U.S. humanitarian assistance 
for the Nagorno-Karabakh response to nearly $28 million since 2020. Meanwhile, the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations announced on Wednesday 
that it will deliver 40 tons of humanitarian aid to Armenia for “citizens who 
were forced to leave the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh.”
It said that the aid, which includes food, blankets and a mobile power station, 
is organized at the direction of the president of Russia and on behalf of the 
government of the Russian Federation. Moscow Sees ‘Camouflaged’ Efforts By Yerevan To Change Foreign-Policy Vector
Maria Zakharova, an official representative of the Foreign Ministry of Russia 
(file photo)
Russia sees a “radical change” in Armenia’s foreign-policy orientation despite 
what its Foreign Ministry’s spokesperson has described as Yerevan’s attempts to 
“camouflage” it with its rhetoric. At a press briefing in Moscow on Wednesday Maria Zakharova jibed at statements 
made by Armenian officials, including Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, about 
“diversifying of Armenia’s foreign policy without changing the vector.”
“One would also like to hear how they see it in practice,” Zakharova said, as 
quoted by Russia’s TASS news agency. She said the kind of rhetoric is “a blatant attempt to hide true intentions.”
“It is clear that the matter concerns a radical change in the republic’s 
orientation in foreign affairs,” she said, claiming that Yerevan is changing its 
foreign-policy vector “clearly at the suggestion or prompting of the West.”
“On the other hand, they are trying to camouflage it in every possible way, 
thinking that this way they can maintain the same level of assistance and 
special relationship. This is all so visible and clear that it is impossible to 
hide it all behind such words or formulations,” Zakharova said. In his recent public remarks Pashinian has criticized Russia, a formal military 
and political ally of Yerevan, for failing to come to Armenia’s aid in its 
disputes with Azerbaijan, including a series of recent deadly border clashes as 
a result of which Armenia says some of its territories were occupied. Tensions between Armenia and Russia rose further after Azerbaijan’s September 
19-20 military offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh that led to the exodus of the 
region’s virtually entire ethnic Armenian population. Armenia, in particular, 
blamed Russian peacekeepers deployed in Nagorno-Karabakh under the 2020 
ceasefire agreement between Moscow, Baku and Yerevan for failing to protect the 
local Armenians. Pashinian defended his government’s policy that he said was aimed at 
diversifying relations in the security sphere as he addressed the parliament in 
Yerevan on November 15. The day before that the Armenian leader announced his decision not to attend an 
upcoming summit of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), a 
Russia-led defense bloc of six former Soviet countries that also includes 
Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. Earlier this year Armenia also declined to participate in CSTO military drills, 
while hosting joint exercises with the United States military in Yerevan. This 
and several other moves by Yerevan drew angry reactions from Russia that has 
accused the Pashinian administration of systematically “destroying” relations 
with Moscow. During today’s press briefing Russia’s Zakharova lamented Yerevan’s decision not 
to attend the CSTO’s November 23 summit and meetings at the level of ministers 
prior to it. “We do not believe that it meets the long-term interests of the Armenian people 
and will contribute to the strengthening of security and stability of this 
friendly country,” she said. At the same time, Zakharova said that Armenia is not going to block the work of 
the CSTO’s statutory bodies or prevent the approval of documents that have 
already been agreed. “This essentially leaves the door open for Yerevan and allows it to join the 
work in the future, and we hope that [our] Armenian ally will use this 
opportunity in the near future,” she concluded. Another Armenian Official To Skip CSTO Event
Նոյեմբեր 22, 2023
Armenian Parliament Speaker Alen Simonian attending the European Conference of 
Speakers of Parliaments of the Council of Europe in Dublin, the Republic of 
Ireland, September 29, 2023. Armenian Parliament Speaker Alen Simonian said on Wednesday that he will not 
attend an upcoming event of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) 
as Armenia’s prime minister and other officials have skipped the Russia-led 
defense bloc’s meetings being held in Minsk, Belarus, this week. Simonian said that he had informed his CSTO colleagues that he would not attend 
the event that he said is scheduled for December. “There is no answer from them until now. And I think there won’t be. I am sure 
that the reasons for my not participating are clear to them,” said Alen 
Simonian, denying, at the same time, that this amounts to “freezing of 
relations.”
“Armenia does not have a decision to withdraw from the CSTO, but I believe that 
my participation in the given event is not appropriate in the current situation. And the situation is that the CSTO does not fulfill its obligations and did not 
fulfill its obligations in the past either,” the Armenian parliament speaker 
said. Earlier this month Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian announced that he 
will not attend the CSTO summit due to be held in Minsk on November 23. Armenia’s foreign minister and defense minister are not attending the meetings 
of their colleagues gathering in the Belarusian capital on Wednesday either. CSTO Secretary-General Imangali Tasmagambetov said earlier this week that 
official Yerevan had asked to remove the issue of providing military assistance 
to Armenia from the summit agenda. Armenia had appealed to the CSTO for military assistance in September 2022 
following two-day deadly border clashes with Azerbaijan that Yerevan said 
stemmed from Baku’s aggression against sovereign Armenian territory. The Russia-led bloc that also includes Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and 
Tajikistan did not publicly call Azerbaijan the aggressor and refused to back 
Armenia militarily, while agreeing to consider sending an observation mission to 
the South Caucasus country. At the CSTO summit held in Yerevan in November 2022 Armenia declined such a 
mission, saying that before it could be carried out it needed to give a clear 
political assessment of what Yerevan said was Azerbaijan’s aggression and 
occupation of sovereign Armenian territory. Explaining his decision to skip the Minsk summit, the Armenian prime minister 
told the parliament in Yerevan earlier this month that the “fundamental problem” 
with the CSTO was that this organization had refused “to de-jure fixate its area 
of responsibility in Armenia.”
“In these conditions this could mean that by silently participating [in the 
summit] we could join the logic that would question Armenia’s territorial 
integrity and sovereignty. We can’t allow ourselves to do such a thing, and by 
making such decisions [not to attend CSTO gatherings] we give the CSTO and 
ourselves time to think over further actions,” Pashinian said. During the November 15 question-and-answer session in parliament the Armenian 
leader refused to be drawn into the discussion of whether Armenia planned to 
formally quit the CSTO, nor would he speak about any security alternatives to 
membership in this organization. “We are not planning to announce a change in our policy in strategic terms as 
long as we haven’t made a decision to quit the CSTO,” Pashinian said. Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin, on Wednesday 
again lamented the decision by the Armenian leader not to attend the Minsk 
summit of the CSTO. But he added, according to Russia’s TASS news agency, that 
the Kremlin expects that “Armenia will continue its work within the framework of 
the organization.”
Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc. 1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

‘Which Future Do We Have?’: Stories from Refugees in Armenia

Nov 21 2023
  • Population: 3 million
  • People in Need: 27,000
  • People Facing Hunger: 690,000
  • Program Start: 2018

Nearly 22,500 refugees in Armenia will experience a mental health condition following the recent conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, according to a recent estimate by the World Health Organization. September marked the rapid escalation of a decades-long conflict in Armenia and Azerbaijan, forcing more than 100,000 refugees to flee their homes. Families were forced to make dangerous journeys and arrived in Armenia with little food, water, or shelter.

“These refugees arrived with nothing,” said Marcella Maxfield, Action Against Hunger’s Regional Director for South Caucasus. “Facing an uncertain future, they are now in desperate need of emergency assistance—for both urgent needs like food and water and necessities like bedding, medicine, mental healthcare and psychosocial support.”

Prior to the sudden violence, many ethnic Armenians lived in an autonomous small enclave region or “oblast” called Nagorno-Karabakh. It’s been home to around 120,000 people for decades. But when Azerbaijan launched a sudden offensive at the end of September, nearly all ethnic Armenians left in an exodus. The military offensive was preceded by a nine-month blockade, during which most families in Nagorno-Karabakh faced severe hunger, little electricity, and constant fear.

After a nearly 30-year bid for independence, the de facto authorities in Nagorno-Karabakh agreed to disband its government and armed forces following the attack.

Most of the population was forced to abandon their homes and relocate to the Armenian border province of Syunik, especially in the town of Goris. The journey was long and exhausting. There was only one escape route out of Nagorno-Karabakh: a winding mountain road. Many people were already weak and underprepared after enduring a nine-month blockade, where most families were only allocated small food rations. The forced mass departure only exacerbated many illnesses or cases of malnutrition.

After three days in the car with very little food or water—or, in some cases, hours of walking miles and miles—many grew malnourished or fell ill. Some of the most vulnerable or eldest of the group died along the way.

Today, many refugees have spread out in larger cities like Yerevan, Kotayk and Ararat. Armenia is now faced with an extensive refugee crisis; 1 in 30 people throughout the country is a refugee. More than half of the refugees are women and girls, nearly one third are children, and nearly one fifth are elderly. Their whole lives are uprooted. In the coming weeks, they will have to restart their lives: finding a home, a job, and personal belongings, since most arrived with practically nothing.

The conflict has sparked a mental health crisis, too. Yet even with little to their names, they are showcasing resilience, strength, and hope. Here are their stories.

Anoush, 38 

When Anoush was forced to flee her home on September 26, she only had time to bring three things—the last of her onions and potatoes and a few winter coats. She left with her husband and her son and traveled for two days before reaching Goris. They had nothing to eat, and out of desperation, asked people in passing cars for water to survive the long trek.

Before the violence escalated, Anoush and her family endured a nine-month blockade in Nagorno-Karabakh with little food. They relied on pasta and rice for months, and desperately stocked up on as much medicine as possible for their son’s allergies. In May, Anoush ran out of flour, and she resorted to baking bread out of a mix of different cereals. She and her neighbors began baking bread in a shared outdoor fireplace—no electricity was available. To start a fire, she had to collect wood from the forest, since no fuel was to be found either.

During the rare months that the schools were open, Anoush’s son had to do homework during the day. At night there was only candlelight, which reinforced his anxiety about the ongoing blockade.

Anoush is a trained psychologist, and in Nagorno-Karabakh, she worked in a university and center for elders.

“After the blockade started, all that my patients could think about was the situation. There was chaos. Everyone forgot why they were coming to the psychologist in the first place and could only think about the blockade,” she said. “Before the blockade, I told my patients to look forward to the future. After the blockade, I could not say that anymore. Which future did we have?”

This is the third time Anoush has been displaced. In 2020, her house in Nagorno-Karabakh was destroyed during the conflict. She and her family rebuilt it, but “now, we are not going to be able to reconstruct anything.”

Now, Anoush lives in a small apartment in Goris. She is still in survival-mode—she used to love making toys and baking desserts, but no longer has any interest. Each night, she sleeps next to her son.

“My son is still afraid of the bombardments,” she said. “He does not want to sleep alone.”

Nora, 26

Nora fled the conflict on September 25 with her whole family—her grandmother, aunt, niece, newborn cousin, mother, father, husband, sisters, and brother. They arrived three days later in Goris. For the last two days of their journey, they had nothing to eat. They were forced to resort to drinking water from lakes and rivers in the surrounding mountains. Throughout the entire trip, Nora said that no one was able to sleep for even one hour.

During the blockade, Nora was pregnant, but she miscarried due to acute stress and malnutrition. Access to health services was limited, and it took Nora over an hour and a half to walk to work. They relied mostly on the potatoes they grew themselves.

Now, Nora lives with a family member in a city called Parakar, in Armenia. Her apartment has no electricity, gas, or water. They have a small reserve of savings to buy food, but it is already running low.

Nora worries for her seven-year-old brother, who has already suffered so much for someone so young.

“He needs psychological support. He cannot sleep because he still hears the bombarding.”

Nora has one wish—to return home. “I want to go back to Nagorno-Karabakh,” she said.

Armine and Sasun, 44

Armine and Sasun have leaned on each other for over two decades. Without each other to rely on—or without the kindness of friends—they would have had to suffer through challenges and conflicts alone.

The pair met in childhood. They grew up as neighbors and even went to the same kindergarten. They have been together for 23 years now and have a son and daughter. Armine and Sasun have endured many seasons of life by each other’s side.

In 2009, Armine and Sasun met a soldier in Armenia by chance. The soldier, who wishes to remain anonymous, immediately bonded with Armine and Sasun and the three became very good friends. They all stayed in touch for years, and in 2020, when the first conflict broke out, Armine and Sasun took refuge in the soldier’s home in Goris. Armine’s brother was killed during the war, and the soldier offered a safe place for the family to stay and mourn.

The soldier repeated the same hospitality and kindness in September 2023, when Armine and Sasun fled Nagorno-Karabakh. Armine is especially grateful for their soldier friend, who has hosted four families since September. Right when the conflict broke out, the soldier opened up her home to 17 people. Now, only four remain: Armine, Sasun, and their children.

For months prior to the conflict, Armine and Sasun had already been living off meager food rations during the blockade. They were given vouchers to buy food, but the amounts were hardly sufficient—three kilograms of vegetables, two kilograms of fruit, two kilograms of potatoes and a small amount of bread. Armine and Sasun were expected to divide this portion amongst the entire family. If they didn’t use the vouchers to buy food within a two-week period, they missed their opportunity— and there would be no telling when the next round of vouchers would arrive. It was expensive, too: even though they had vouchers, they still had to purchase the food themselves. A single cabbage could cost over $16.

Just like the soldier had done for them, Armine and Sasun tried their best to lend a helping hand to others in their town. “There were exchanges, and people helped each other as much as possible,” Sasun said.

Armine agreed, adding that her son once went to buy bread and stood in a queue until 5am. On the way home, however, he gave the bread away to a disabled man that was struggling.

“We were taking care of each other. It would have been impossible to survive if we had not supported each other.”

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Armine and Sasun were forced to flee Nagorno-Karabakh on Sep. 26 with barely any notice. Their apartment was completely destroyed by the war. They were on the road for two days and only had one loaf of bread to share between them. The soldier greeted them with open arms when they arrived in Armenia.

“These are my friends: how could I not invite them to my house?” she said. “Even before this war, during the blockade, we tried to be in touch as much as possible to try and help them.”

The soldier said that it makes her happy to be surrounded by people. “The doors of my house were always open,” she said. “Your hearts and doors should always be open. When the house is empty, my soul is empty. We do not care about our money and savings, we care about hospitality. Helping each other.”

Narine, 46

Narine has been displaced twice now. The first time was in 2020, during which her whole family moved to Yerevan, Armenia’s capital city. They stayed in a hotel for 44 days. Her son joined the army to fight on the border, and Narine experienced a severe mental health crisis. “I was very bad psychologically,” she said. “I was depressed.”

After a month and a half, Narine returned home to Nagorno-Karabakh. She only experienced a short period of peace before her life was disrupted again. During the long blockade, there was no transportation, no fuel, and little access to healthcare. She said the drug stores were empty and she was barely able to find painkillers. “The closest hospital was over 15 miles away from our house. I have a heart illness and am unable to walk such long distances.”

Food was also scarce—like many others during the blockade, Narine relied on the mandated 200 grams of bread per family member. She mostly survived on a diet of potatoes and poorly made bread, which she whipped up out of what little ingredients she could find.

“The bread we made was almost black, but at least we had that,” she said. “We were hungry.”
When Narine fled to Goris, she could only bring a few items: clothes for her six kids and a little bit of bread, cheese, and water—only enough to sustain her for one day. Her supply ran out quickly during the long journey to Armenia. Now, Narine can barely afford rent for an apartment in Goris. She has little money and is quickly losing hope.

Action Against Hunger’s Response

Action Against Hunger has responded to emergencies in South Caucasus since 1993. Today, our teams are on the ground in Kotayk, Ararat, Vayots Dzor, Yerevan, and Syunik, assessing needs and providing urgent assistance.

Since the onset of the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, we have been carrying out emergency preparedness and response projects to support displaced people. Today, we’re coordinating multipurpose cash and voucher assistance, supporting nutrition initiatives, offering protection and legal assistance, establishing child-friendly and breastfeeding spaces, helping people find homes and livelihoods, and more. We are providing cash and voucher assistance for 3,500 households and mental health and psychosocial support for 1,500 individuals across the country.

We are partnering with local community centers and ensuring that we offer safety and support to as many refugees as possible.

Rubio’s Armenian Protection Act Heads to the House After Passing in the Senate

Floridian Press, FL
Nov 21 2023

MATEO GUILLAMONT

|
NOVEMBER 21, 2023

Washington, D.C.- Senators Gary Peters’ (D-MI) and Marco Rubio’s (R-FL) bipartisan Armenian Protection Act has successfully passed in the Senate.

Last September, Azerbaijan launched a military invasion into the Armenian-held  Nagorno-Karabakh ethnic enclave and seized control of the area. 

Hundreds of thousands have been forced to flee and hundreds have been killed or injured. 

The military offensive was preceded by a 9-month siege of Nagorno-Karabakh, which reportedly prevented the flow of medical supplies and food. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in February ordered Azerbaijan call-off its blockade, which Azerbaijan failed to do. 

A group of bipartisan Senators had penned a letter to Secretary of State Anthony Blinken and Secretary of the Treasury Jannet Yellen requesting immediate sanctions on the Azerbaijan government. 

Absent action from the White House, the Armenian Protection Act would cut all US aid to Azerbaijan until blockades and offensive acts towards Armenia and the Nagorno-Karabakh region cease.

“U.S. taxpayer dollars should not be going towards Azerbaijan, a nation that has brought instability to the region,” said Senator Rubio in support of the bill’s passage. 

The Armenian Assembly of America, an advocacy group seeking to increase US-Armenia relations and bolster US support of Armenian public institutions, welcomed the bill’s passage. 

“We commend Senator Peters along with Senator Rubio for this bipartisan legislation,” stated Congressional Relations Director Mariam Khaloyan. “Passage of this Bill sends a strong message in the face of Azerbaijan’s genocidal policies against the Armenian people,” Khaloyan continued.

Earlier in November, Armenian Apostolic Church leaders met with Congressmembers in the House of Representatives to lobby for American support of Armenia 

Given the bi-partisan support for the Armenian Protection Act in the Senate, its speedy passage in the House is expected.

 

No decision on withdrawal from Moscow-led bloc, says senior Armenian lawmaker

TASS, Russia
Nov 22 2023
Armenian Prime Nikol Pashinyan announced earlier that he would not take part in the CSTO summit in Minsk

YEREVAN, November 22. /TASS/. Yerevan is not leaving the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), Armenian National Assembly (parliament) President Alen Simonyan told reporters.

"Armenia has not made a decision to withdraw from the CSTO," he said, commenting on Armenian officials’ refusal to participate in CSTO events scheduled to be held in the Belarusian capital of Minsk on November 23.

Armenian Prime Nikol Pashinyan announced earlier that he would not take part in the CSTO summit in Minsk. The country’s foreign and defense ministers also refused to participate in CSTO events. Parliament speaker Alen Simonyan, in turn, said that he would not attend a session of the CSTO Parliamentary Assembly in December. Armenia has also recalled its ambassador to the CSTO and has not appointed a new head of its diplomatic mission.

When commenting on Armenian officials’ refusal to participate in CSTO events in Minsk, Russian Presidential Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that Mosow expected Yerevan to continue working in the organization.

President of Iraq visits Armenia

 17:22,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 21, ARMENPRESS. President of Iraq Abdul Latif Rashid has arrived to Armenia.

The Iraqi President will have meetings with President of Armenia Vahagn Khachaturyan, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Speaker of Parliament Alen Simonyan.

President Abdul Latif Rashid was welcomed at the Zvartnots Airport in Yerevan by Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan.

[see video]

USAID to provide $4.1 million in additional humanitarian aid to people affected by the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh

 17:57,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 21, ARMENPRESS. The United States, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID),on November 21  announced more than $4.1 million in additional humanitarian assistance for people affected by the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh.

The Armenian mission of the US Agency for International Development said in a statement that  this additional funding brings total U.S. humanitarian assistance for the Nagorno-Karabakh response to nearly $28 million since 2020.

“Azerbaijan’s military operation in Nagorno-Karabakh between September 19 and 20 displaced more than 100,000 people into neighboring Armenia and generated significant humanitarian needs.

With this additional assistance, USAID is supporting efforts on the ground to provide urgently needed humanitarian assistance for almost 74,000 vulnerable refugees and displaced persons from Nagorno-Karabakh who are sheltering in Armenia. This funding will increase life-saving food assistance and provide humanitarian protection and emergency shelter. 

The U.S. stands with civilians affected by Azerbaijan’s military operation and supports the Armenian government’s efforts to help those in need,’’ reads the statement.

Putin calls for joint global efforts to end Israeli-Palestinian conflict

 19:11,

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 21, ARMENPRESS. Russian President Vladimir Putin finds it necessary to unite the efforts of the  international community in finding a political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The international community should join forces to find a political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Russian President Vladimir Putin said, Tass reports.

"Russia’s position is consistent and does not change with the situation. We urge the international community to join forces in order to ease tensions, ensure a ceasefire and find a political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," he noted, addressing an extraordinary summit of the BRICS group (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), Tass quoted the Russian President as saying.

Armenia may deliver 200 ballistic missiles and S-300s to Ukraine

Bulgarian Military
Nov 21 2023

Among Russian bloggers, there is concern that Armenia may become an unexpected donor to Ukraine. The Russian Telegram channel Militarist [TCM] reports that “Yerevan intends to hand over the launchers of the Tochka-U missile system and 200 missiles to Ukraine.”

  • Pinaka Mark-II guided missile to face Israel’s HAROP in Armenia
  • Kyiv rejected the free Bastion APCs and they went to Armenia
  • Russia stole APCs and IFVs from Armenia and sent them to Ukraine

According to TCM, Washington has asked Yerevan [the capital of Armenia] to provide Ukraine with Osa-K air defense systems, which are also in service with the Armenian army.

The United States and Great Britain have long traveled the world in search of remaining Soviet standard weapons that could be sent to Ukraine, writes TCM.

“And given Pashinyan’s general pro-Western course, this news does not seem incredible. He may find a ‘moral justification’ for this act in the fact that Russia sells arms to Azerbaijan,” commented the Russian blogger on Telegram.

TCM fears that Armenia, the USA, and Washington will not limit themselves to the already mentioned Soviet weapon systems. Armenia has at least five divisions of S-300PS and at least as many S-300 PTs. “Armenia also has five divisions of Iskander ballistic missile systems,” TCM also wrote.

“By the way, given the specifics of Ukrainian logistics, it can be assumed that Point-U from Armenia may already be in Ukraine,” the Russian blogger suggests.

The OTR-21 [Yochka-U] is a streamlined mobile missile launcher system, specifically created to operate seamlessly within land combat scenarios. However, the 9K52 Luna-M missile system is somewhat larger and lacks the precision of the OTR-21. Yet, the OTR-21 excels in size and accuracy, making it a formidable navigation tool. 

This missile can hit enemy targets such as control posts, bridges, and storage facilities with precision. It can target troop concentrations and airfields as well. The fragmented warhead can be replaced with a nuclear, biological, or even chemical weapon. The solid propellant ensures ease of maintenance and deployment. 

The 9K33 Osa showcases an integrated 9A33 transporter-launcher and radar vehicles capable of detecting, tracking, and engaging aircraft independently or with the help of regimental surveillance radars. Its transporter vehicle, the VAZ-5937, boasts full amphibious capability and air mobility. The ground coverage is estimated to be around 500 km. 

The S-300, developed by the former Soviet Union, is a long-range surface-to-air missile system series. It was industrially produced by NPO Almaz for the Soviet Air Defence Forces as a defensive measure against air raids and cruise missiles. Even today, the S-300 is considered one of the most effective anti-aircraft missile systems in operation. 

The S-300 system has been adopted by Russia, Ukraine, other countries of the former Eastern Bloc, as well as Greece and Bulgaria. It also finds use in China, Iran, among other nations in Asia. 

This missile system is fully automated but can also allow manual observation and operation. Each associated radar signifies targets for the central command post. The command post then scrutinizes the data it obtains from the targeting radars to sift out false targets. The command post also offers both active and passive target detection modes. Its missiles can cover a maximum range of 40 kilometers [or approximately 25 miles] from the command post.