Turkish Military Seeks Armenia Detente

TURKISH MILITARY SEEKS ARMENIA DETENTE

Armenpress
Feb 13 2007

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 13, ARMENPRESS: The assassination of a prominent
Turkish-Armenian journalist, Hrant Dink, on 19 January 2007 in
Istanbul renewed attention on Turkey’s troubled relations with its
small neighbor, Armenia, according to an article in Jane’s Information
Group’s magazine.

It says the record of Turkish-Armenian relations has been blighted
by both Ankara’s refusal to extend normal diplomatic relations to
Yerevan and a trade embargo and transport blockade, imposed on Armenia
in 1993 in support of Azerbaijan in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

The article says a group of Western-trained young officers brought into
senior posts within the Turkish military’s General Staff authored a
preliminary, semi-official internal study in late 2006 that presented
several new strategic initiatives, including a reconsideration of
Turkey’s long-standing hesitance toward addressing the stalemate
with Armenia.

Such recognition has to date been limited to a rather narrow circle
of Turkish elite, defined by a generally progressive, pro-Western
orientation. In the wake of Dink’s murder, however, there has been
a surprising public outpouring of sympathy for Armenians that has,
at least temporarily, bridged the historic enmity between the two
neighbors. This has also triggered a political shift, with public
opinion presently driving and defending a reassessment of Turkey’s
policies regarding Armenia.

For the Turkish government, the Armenian issue offers a new sense of
political advantage, whereby any improvement in its relations with
Armenia can offer a welcome respite to the recent round of vocal
European opposition to Turkish EU membership aspirations.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Consultations On Karabakh Issue Expected In Paris

CONSULTATIONS ON KARABAKH ISSUE EXPECTED IN PARIS

ArmRadio.am
14.02.2007 11:32

Today in Paris the Co-Chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group Matthew Bryza,
Yuri Merzlyakov and Bernard Fassier will start the recurrent
consultations, featuring the Personal Representative of the OSCE
Chairman-in-Office Ardrzej Kasprzyk.

Ardrzej Kasprzyk told Azeri APA agency that the steps to be taken in
the negotiation process son the Karabakh conflict settlement will be
discussed during the two-day consultations. Reference will made also
to the issue of arranging the meeting of Armenian and Azerbaijani
Foreign Ministers in March.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

The Hague: All Ministers, State Secretaries Known

ALL MINISTERS, STATE SECRETARIES KNOWN

NIS News Bulletin, Netherlands
Feb 14 2007

THE HAGUE, 15/02/07 – Premier Jan Peter Balkenende has completed his
new cabinet consisting of Christian democrats (CDA), Labour (PvdA)
and small Christian party ChristenUnie. The names of all 16 ministers
and 10 state secretaries are known.

The most striking names are Ronald Plasterk, to be Education Minister
for PvdA, and Ab Klink, Health Minister for CDA. Plasterk is a TV
personality and columnist at De Volkskrant newspaper as well as a
genetics professor. Klink is chairman of the CDA’s academic bureau
and one of the devisors of the healthcare system introduced by the
outgoing cabinet.

Other noteworthy names are Ella Vogelaar (PvdA), to be Integration and
Urban Renewal Minister, and Jacqueline Cramer (PvdA), the incoming
Environment Minister. Former communist Vogelaar is chairman of
Unilever’s supervisory board. Cramer is a professor of sustainable
entrepreneurship.

Conspicuously absent among ministers is Amsterdam Alderman Ahmed
Aboutaleb (PvdA). He was tipped as the first Muslim minister, but
will only be Social Affairs State Secretary. It is unclear why PvdA
withdrew him from Education or Integration at the last minute.

Earlier, he was to have been Social Affairs Minister, but this option
disappeared when CDA won this post.

Most other ministers were already more or less known. Balkenende will
be premier, PvdA leader Wouter Bos Finance Minister and ChristenUnie
leader Andre Rouvoet Youth and Family Minister. Bos and Rouvoet will
also be Vice-Premiers.

CDA parliamentary leader Maxime Verhagen will be Foreign Minister,
and ChristenUnie Senator Eimert van Middelkoop, Defence Minister.

PvdA MP Bert Koenders will be Development Cooperation Minister. PvdA
MP Frans Timmermans will be European Affairs State Secretary, carrying
the title of Minister abroad.

Former Justice Minister Piet Hein Donner (CDA) will be Social Affairs
Minister. The present Justice Minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin (CDA)
is staying at this post. For the PvdA, former Nijmegen mayor Guusje
ter Horst is the new Home Affairs Minister.

CDA MEP Camiel Eurlings is Transport Minister and CDA MP Gerda Verburg,
Agriculture Minister. Current Education Minister Maria van der
Hoeven (CDA) is switching to Economic Affairs. Her State Secretary,
carrying the title of Trade Minister abroad, will be former PvdA MP
Frank Heemskerk.

PvdA MP Nebahat Albayrak is Justice State Secretary. This appears
risky, as she was earlier the subject of controversy about the
Armenian genocide in Turkey at the beginning of the 20th century,
on which she took no clear position. With Albayrak and Aboutaleb,
the PvdA has two Muslims in the government.

PvdA MP Jet Bussemaker is Health State Secretary. PvdA deputy
parliamentary leader Sharon Dijksma is Education State Secretary.

This department will have a second State Secretary, for whom the
choice has fallen on CDA party chairman Marja van Bijsterveldt.

The treasurer of the CDA executive, Jan Kees de Jager, will be Finance
State Secretary, responsible for tax policies. Mayor Ank Bijleveld
(CDA) of Hof van Twente is Home Affairs State Secretary.

Cees van der Knaap (CDA) stays on as Defence State Secretary.

The only State Secretary supplied by ChristenUnie is Tineke Huizinga.

She goes to Transport and Public Works. Huizinga is currently an MP.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.nisnews.nl/public/150207_1.htm

Armenian Genocide At The Berlin Film Festival

ARMENIAN GENOCIDE AT THE BERLIN FILM FESTIVAL
By Wolfgang Hobel and Alexander Smoltczyk

Der Spiegel Online, Germany
Feb 14 2007

‘The Lark Farm’ Wakens Turkish Ghosts

The film "The Lark Farm" is sure to stir up controversy at this year’s
Berlin Film Festival. It takes a close look at Turkey’s most sensitive
taboo — the 1915 genocide against the Armenians. Extra security has
been brought in for the Wednesday evening premiere.

All that was missing at the Festival Palace was the wave cheer, given
the level of enthusiasm with which Dieter Kosslick, the festival’s
director, staged the opening gala of the 57th Berlin International
Film Festival last Thursday. Once again, Kosslick has managed to
position the German capital as a world-class film city, and this
year’s Berlinale again vies with past festivals in its relentless
determination to deliver euphoria.

Photo Gallery: Controversial Film at the Berlin Film Festival Click
on a picture to launch the image gallery (3 Photos) The French film
"La Vie en rose," the first film on the festival’s schedule, matched
the effusive mood of the event. In the film, director Olivier Dahan
tells the life story of singer Edith Piaf, sumptuously portraying
her descent into drug addiction and disastrous love affairs. The
president of the festival’s jury Paul Schrader — himself a writer,
director and film critic — has said he sees film as a kind of museum,
or cultural memory bank. It’s an interpretation that clearly applies
to this year’s festival.

Steven Soderbergh’s black-and-white drama "The Good German," provides
a good example. George Clooney portrays an American reporter in
post-World War II Germany who is tragically in love with a beautiful
but mysterious woman (Cate Blanchett). The American thriller "The Good
Shepherd," starring Angelina Jolie, Matt Damon and Alec Baldwin and
directed by Robert De Niro, is a story about the early days of the
CIA. In the historical drama "Die Falscher" ("The Counterfeiters"),
Austrian director Stefan Ruzowitzky describes how inmates at the
Nazi concentration camp in Sachsenhausen were forced to print British
pound notes in a counterfeiting workshop.

Taboo in Turkey

But there is one film that will encounter little competition for
being the most important and stirring contribution to the culture of
reminiscence. It deals with the Turkish genocide of the Armenians, a
topic that is still considered taboo in Turkey. Indeed, sentiments on
the issue are so strong that representatives of the Turkish government
are still trying to convince others to avoid the topic as well. Last
week, for example, Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul made it
clear that relations between his country and the United States could
be seriously jeopardized by a resolution proposed in the US Congress
that would officially condemn the 1915 genocide committed by the Turks.

"If this resolution is approved," Gul threatened representatives of
the Bush administration, which is seeking a strategic partnership
with Turkey, "why should we continue to support one another?"

FROM THE MAGAZINE Find out how you can reprint this DER SPIEGEL
article in your publication. Close to a century after the Armenian
genocide, the issue remains explosive. When Turkish novelist and Nobel
laureate Orhan Pamuk had the courage to write about the genocide, he
was promptly taken to court by ultra-nationalists. After the murder
of Armenian-Turkish journalist Hrant Dink, Pamuk, fearing for his
own life, fled abroad.

The Armenian genocide is sure to become a hot-button issue in Berlin
— home to about 250,000 Turks — where legendary directors Paolo
and Vittoria Taviani will premiere their new film "The Lark Farm"
on Wednesday evening. It is a shocking film about the genocide and
the film’s distributor is nervous. The festival management, fearing
riots, has hired additional security.

Bundles of flesh

It is a film filled with vivid images and meaningful gestures. In one
scene, a Turkish soldier stands awkwardly next to an opulently set
table. He carefully picks up the soup bowl, lifts it into the air,
pauses for a moment, and then slowly pours the soup over the damask
tablecloth. The horror begins with the insignificant, setting the
stage for the unimaginable in the most polite of ways.

In another scene, Turkish servants suddenly refuse to unload the
truck belonging to their Armenian masters, saying that it’s too
late in the day for work. A short time later, the masters, already
earmarked for slaughter as enemies of the people, have been reduced
to sobbing bundles of flesh as they beg for their lives. Such is how
genocide begins.

In their past masterpieces, "Padre Padrone" (1977) and "Notte di
San Lorenzo" ("The Night of San Lorenzo") (1982), Italian directors
Paolo and Vittorio Taviani, both well into their seventies, dealt with
the human effects of persecution and political violence — and with
the desire to rebel against fate. While "The Night of San Lorenzo,"
an episode from the Italian resistance movement against Mussolini’s
fascist militia, managed to describe the senselessness of violence
with the tools of absurdist comedy, "The Lark Farm" is a deeply
dark melodrama.

In the political inferno the film portrays, Moritz Bleibtreu and Paz
Vega are perfectly cast as tragic lovers. "It is not a film against
Turkey, on the contrary," they say, and rightfully so. But the editors
who published the Danish cartoons that so inflamed the Muslim world
were also in the right. "The Lark Farm" could well become the political
scandal at this year’s Berlinale.

Obedience, cowardice, expediencey and vileness

The screenplay, based on a novel by Antonia Arslan — a literature
professor who now lives in Padua — deals with the history of Arslan’s
family. The novel portrays the Avakians, a respected middle-class
Armenian family that lives in a provincial city, hoping that things
will not take a turn for the worse. The film begins with intimate
scenes of beautiful faces and women wearing long dresses, filmed
in the light of a Vermeer painting. The family patriarch has died,
and even the Turkish Colonel Arkan (Andre Dussollier) bows to pay
his respects to the deceased.

NEWSLETTER Sign up for Spiegel Online’s daily newsletter and get the
best of Der Spiegel’s and Spiegel Online’s international coverage in
your In- Box everyday.

But then Arkan receives his orders from Istanbul, orders he promptly
obeys. In only a few scenes, the directors depict the mixture of
obedience and cowardice, of expediency and vileness that has always
made ethnic cleansing and pogroms possible.

The men and boys are crucified, castrated and hacked to pieces, and
the women are sent on a starvation march into the deserts of eastern
Anatolia. Nazim, a beggar (played by Palestinian filmmaker Mohammed
Bakri), betrays his masters but then regrets it and attempts to at
least help the women. Youssuf (Moritz Bleibtreu), a Turkish soldier,
is drawn to the family’s proud surviving daughter (Paz Vega) and falls
in love with her. In an attempt to flee, Nunik sacrifices herself
to enable her nieces to escape. When Youssuf receives his orders —
"Throw them into the fire first, then cut off their heads" — he
decapitates Nunik to save her from being burned alive.

The outstanding performances — and the sheer incomprehensibility
of the events — keep the film from descending into sentimentality,
despite the costumes and the over-abundance of stage blood. The
Tavianis have managed to produce images the film’s viewers will regret
having seen, because these are the kinds of images one has trouble
forgetting. This is both the film’s achievement and its curse.

Watching the film is almost unbearable. According to some eyewitnesses,
soldiers gave Armenian mothers the option of killing their newborn
boys themselves. Others say that women were forced to place their
babies in a rucksack and stand back-to-back with another woman,
their arms interlocked and… One doesn’t want to know or see what
actually happened.

A muffled silence

This is what Vittorio Taviani has to say about it: "The murder of
the innocent has been a part of theater history since the Greeks,
since Shakespeare. Three years ago we discovered the Armenian tragedy,
almost by accident, when we read the book by Antonia Arslan. We wanted
to tell it with the means at our disposal."

Arsinee Khanjian, a Canadian of Armenian heritage who lost part of
her own family, plays the role of Armineh Avakian. In one scene the
severed head of her husband is thrown into her lap. "She was adamant
about acting in our film. She felt that it was a sort of obligation
to her murdered great-grandparents. We promised her that we would
only shoot this scene once, and without rehearsal," says Paolo
Taviani. "According to the script, she was supposed to scream. But
all that came out was a muffled silence. We left it that way."

The Armenians were Christians, often educated and affluent. As such,
they made for the ideal fifth column when the Ottoman Empire attacked
Russia. But the Ottomans lost the war. According to the official
version in Ankara, the Armenians had to be resettled during the war,
and most of them died as a result of disease and at the hands of
Kurdish tribes. But many contest that version.

"One million Armenians were murdered. This is something hardly anyone
dares to say," said Orhan Pamuk prior to his winning the Nobel Prize in
Literature. His words immediately made Pamuk the victim of nationalist,
hate-mongering propaganda. The persecution and murder of the Armenian
minority remains the foremost trauma of the founding of modern Turkey.

It was, in fact, the "young Turks," those who were eager to found a
new and modern state, who issued the orders which led to the deaths
of the Armenians. Recognizing the genocide as such would be tantamount
to admitting that the spiritual founders of modern Turkey were men who
today would be easily convicted of war crimes by the International War
Crimes Tribunal in The Hague. And yet the majority of officers charged
with crimes against the Armenians were promptly released after the war.

Efforts in vain

For the past 70 years, Hollywood studio Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer has had
plans to film the Armenian epic "The Forty Days of Musa Dagh," by
Czech-born poet, playwright and novelist Franz Werfel. And Sylvester
Stallone has likewise recently indicated he would be interested
in making the movie. But the project was repeatedly shelved for
political reasons. Keeping NATO’s eastern flank happy was apparently
more important that bringing justice to a minority that had already
been heavily decimated.

Even today the European Union avoids using the word "genocide,"
anxious not to cast a shadow on the negotiations over Turkey’s bid
for EU membership.

The film is an Italian-French-Bulgarian-Spanish co-production.

Turkey’s delegate to the European film fund Eurimage attempted to
put a stop to the Taviani project. But this time Turkey’s efforts
were in vain.

Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

l/0,1518,466427,00.html

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiege

Support Turkey To Win In Iraq

SUPPORT TURKEY TO WIN IN IRAQ
by by Scott Sullivan

The Conservative Voice, NC
Feb 14 2007

Republicans should ignore the White House happy talk that it is
winning the war on terrorism. Instead, the US is losing Turkey as an
ally and is surrendering Iraq to Iran.

US-Turkish relations will reach the point of no return with the vote
on the Armenian genocide resolution, now scheduled in April. This
resolution is favored to pass. With this vote the Congress will deeply
alienate Turkey, a key NATO ally in the war on terrorism.

Meanwhile, the White House is further alienating Turkey by favoring
Iran and the Kurds in Iraq, especially the Kurds by awarding them
control of the oil-rich city of Kirkuk. US decisions on Armenian
genocide and Kirkuk will humiliate Turkey. The Turkish government will
retaliate against the Kurds, a response that could easily derail US
plans for Iraq and the US war on terrorism in general.

To begin with Iraq, Turkey sees US policy in Iraq as hostile and
directed and in favor of Iran and the Kurds. Turkey looks behind the
White House rhetoric against Iran and notes that the US and Iran
are now quietly cooperating in support of Prime Minister Maliki’s
government. Turkey anticipates that this US-Iranian cooperation
will deepen as pressure builds in Congress, thanks to the Democrats,
for an early withdrawal of US troops.

To be specific, the US needs to find a partner so that it can hand
over power as it withdraws from Iraq. From Turkey’s perspective,
the new US partner in Iraq will be Iran, not Turkey.

Even more alarming from Turkey’s perspective is the fear that
Kurdistan also benefits from US policy. In fact, the new state of
Kurdistan, under US military protection, is already emerging on Iraq’s
territory. Turkey is concerned that this new Kurdistan will encourage
rebellion by Turkey’s own Kurds and the PKK. A PKK insurgency in
Turkey claimed 30,000 lives in the mid-1990’s.

Turkey is now fearful that their worst fears about US policy are
justified as the US and Iraq prepare to turn over the oil-rich city
of Kirkuk to Kurdistan via a referendum scheduled for December of
this year (Kirkuk is located just outside Kurdistan’s territory and
is claimed by Kurdistan). Kurdistan’s acquisition of Kirkuk would
be an enormous humiliation for Turkey, as has been made clear by
repeated statements from the Turkish government, largely ignored by
the Bush Administration.

Turkey’s concerns over Kirkuk will be magnified by Turkey’s defeat
at the hands of congressional democrats on the Armenian genocide
resolution. It now appears a sure bet that congress will pass an
Armenian genocide resolution before Kirkuk passes into Kurdistan’s
control.

In sum, Turkey faces a crisis due to the Kirkuk referendum and the
congressional vote on the Armenian genocide resolution. So far,
the White House has given no sign that it can help with Congress on
the genocide resolution and refuses to postpone Kirkuk’s referendum
in December.

Turkey can do little or nothing about the Armenian genocide
resolution. Indeed, Speaker Pelosi, Senator Biden and Senator Reid all
conspicuously snubbed Turkish Foreign Minister Gul when he requested
meetings last week to discuss the resolution.

Turkey can, however, do something about the Kirkuk referendum.

Indeed, Turkey’s defeat on the genocide resolution greatly increases
the pressure on Turkey’s government to block the referendum, as it
has vowed to do. Turkey has both the military capability and the
influence in Kirkuk’s political affairs to block the referendum.

In short, Turkey’s actions on Kirkuk will derail President Bush’s
plan for Iraq and his war on terrorism, where Iraq is the centerpiece,
as Bush has often stated. Bush’s policy in Iraq of handing over power,
while withdrawing forces, to Iran and Kurdistan will go by the wayside,
a victim of Democratic Party activism against Turkey and Turkey’s
retaliation against Kurdistan. For those who had doubts about the
Bush plan for Iraq all along, these developments will come as welcome
relief. Iran and Kurdistan will be the big losers.

le/22794.html

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.theconservativevoice.com/artic

A Turkish Murder Echoes Throughout The West

A TURKISH MURDER ECHOES THROUGHOUT THE WEST

Assyrian International News Agency, CA
Feb 14 2007

Fifty-three-year old Turkish-Armenian journalist, editor and columnist
Hrant Dink was slain by gunfire in Istanbul on January 19, 2007. He
was not only a courageous outspoken member of the Armenian minority
in Turkey, he was husband to Rachel, who read aloud her letter to
him at his funeral, and the father of several children.

According to eyewitnesses, Dink was shot three times at point blank
range in the back of his head by a young man who shouted, "I shot the
unbeliever!" before he fled the scene. Reports are that the three-shot
assassination style is that of the Turkish Hezbollah.

How could a seventeen-year old teenager be so manipulated by
nationalistic agitation as to commit a cold-blooded murder?

Turkey has mourned the untimely death of Dink, editor of the
Turkish-Armenian weekly journal Agos, and the loss of such an
important voice for its political conscience. But how sincere was
the public weeping for him? Before his death, he was treated by the
media and politicians as a public enemy because of his comments about
Turkish-Armenian relations and the massacres of Armenians during
the First World War which he characterized as genocide. We cannot
but suspect that for some Turkish politicians, the condemnation of
Dink’s assassination was motivated not by his death itself but by
fear about the consequences of this atrocity for potential Turkish
entry into the European Union.

The murder reflected the toxic political atmosphere in Turkey. For
a lot of journalists "paragraph 301" of the common law remains
significant, in that it bans supposed insults to Turkish national
identity. Even the Nobel Prize-winning Turkish author Orhan Pamuk
was charged under this law, and Dink himself was prosecuted three
times for insulting Turkishness. In fact, he received numerous death
threats from Turkish nationalists who accused him of treason. Public
prosecutor Kemal Kerincsiz must listen to the voices of those who
blame his judicial career for the murder, since he charged Hrant
Dink under the same law. Kerincisiz rejects any complicity in Dink’s
death and defends his action against Dink as well as this clause in
the law which, in the present author’s opinion, should be abolished
for the sake of Turkish intellectual freedom.

The killing of journalists has a dreadful history in Turkey. Abdi
Ipekci and Ugur Mumcu were among the famous victims of aggression
based on nationalist fantasies as well as religious intolerance. In
fact, today, critics still live in great danger in Turkey. Sadly, the
Turkish-Islamist construction of national identity diverts people from
seeking the recovery of cultural and political pluralism in Turkey,
a very great loss indeed.

Many Turkish people paid their last respects to the Turkish-Armenian
journalist who always supported dialogue between Armenians and Turks
and who refused to leave Turkey even though he received threats. The
slogans "We all are Hrant Dink" and "We all are Armenians" stand as
evidence for Dink’s high reputation as a prominent intellectual in
Turkey. The impressive demonstrations express nothing less than the
highest appreciation of Hrant Dink’s commitment to freedom of opinion
and democracy.

Regrettably, however, Turkey must accept the reality that nationalist
groups celebrated this unspeakable crime. They showed publicly that
the nationalist image is more important to them than a human life.

Acclaim for the murder of Hrant Dink showed that the Turkish propensity
for extremism has changed, but that the bloody tradition persists. The
nationalists saw Hrant Dink as a separatist, who risked the unity and
alleged honor of the country. Important politicians like premiere Recep
Tayyip Erdogan and President Ahmet Nedet Sezer were absent from the
funeral. The political barriers were too high to be overcome. Other
items on their agendas seemed more important for them. Erdogan thus
indicated that the bullets which killed the 53-year old journalist
and publisher were aimed at all Turkish citizens.

Conspiracy theorists in Turkey very quickly argued that foreign
influences are inflicting political harm on the country. Still,
the people ask: why do dissidents fear for their lives?

How could a seventeen-year old teenager be so manipulated by
nationalistic agitation as to commit a cold-blooded murder? After his
arrest he said that Dink described Turkish blood as unclean, and had
to pay for it. The assassin came from the margins of the nationalist
milieu, where teenagers are misused and dissidents are attacked.

Other suspects were also arrested, as well they should be; there
is certainly more behind the murder of Dink than a simple act by an
enraged teenager.

The claim that the crime was not political, which Turkish politicians
want people to accept, has no ring of truth. The young assassin is a
child of this nationalistic rhetoric that describes Turks as honest,
hard-working and accomplished. But proof of such an identity cannot
be found in Turkish society, or in its bloody history, even after
the formation of the republic.

What this will mean for Turkey’s acceptance into the European Union
remains to be seen; but the shots fired into Hrant Dink’s head were
certainly heard throughout the West.

By Ali Sirin Source

FamilySecurityMatte rs.org Contributing Editor Ali Sirin is a German
journalist in the Alevi Muslim community. This text was translated by
Hasan Canoglu and is distributed by the Center for Islamic Pluralism
in Washington and London

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.FamilySecurityMatters.org

Russia To Modernize Armenia Base

RUSSIA TO MODERNIZE ARMENIA BASE
By Emil Danielyan

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Feb 14 2007

Russia plans to modernize the weaponry and other equipment of its
troops stationed in Armenia, a top Russian military official said on
Wednesday at the start of a three-day visit to his country’s closest
regional ally.

General Vladimir Mikhaylov, commander-in-chief of the Russian Air
Force, said Moscow is already repairing technical facilities as part
of a "gradual re-equipment" of its military base headquartered in
the Armenian city of Gyumri. The Russian military intends to supply
it with new equipment, he told reporters in Yerevan, refusing to go
into details.

Mikhaylov’s comments will likely be welcomed by official Yerevan which
regards the Russian military presence as a key element of Armenia’s
national security doctrine. As recently as in late December, Defense
Minister Serzh Sarkisian expressed hope that the Russian base will be
modernized this year with "the most modern weapons." Sarkisian said
he will be "twice as happy" if some of those weapons are transferred
to the Armenian army.

The Gyumri base has already been boosted with some of the hardware
belonging to Russian troops that are being pulled out of neighboring
Georgia. The transfer was completed late last year amid protests
from Azerbaijan.

Mikhaylov arrived in Yerevan to preside over an annual meeting of the
air defense chiefs of Russia, Armenia and four other ex-Soviet states
making up the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). The
meeting will be followed by the inauguration of the newly upgraded
Russian-Armenian system of air defense which was launched almost
eight years ago.

Mikhaylov’s deputy, Lieutenant-General Aytech Bizhev, revealed recently
that Russia helped to modernize Armenia’s anti-aircraft capabilities
last year. He said Armenian specialists will now be able to operate
the Russian S-300 missile systems that were deployed in Armenia in
the late 1990s.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenia Should Look For Common Interests With Regional Neighbors

ARMENIA SHOULD LOOK FOR COMMON INTERESTS WITH REGIONAL NEIGHBORS

PanARMENIAN.Net
13.02.2007 14:11 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ In connection with recognition of Kosovo’s
independence a collision of interests of superpowers is possible,
stated expert of ‘Kavkaz’ Analytical Center Manvel Sargsyan. In his
words, Russia may recognize independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia,
which will lead to fundamental changes in the region. The expert also
underlined that Kosovo’s independence will not become a precedent
for the Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement, though it will reflect
on the solution generally. Manvel Sargsyan also stressed the negative
influence on Karabakh issue, which proceeds from Azerbaijan’s isolation
policy of Armenia. In his words, taking into account the current
stage of Karabakh process Armenia should look for common interests
with regional neighbors. "Iran and Russia are our allies, but we do
not have wide spectrum of strategic interests with these countries,"
stated the expert underlining the necessity to establish relations
with regional neighbors, particularly with Turkey. "For example,
Armenia could recognize the North Cyprus Republic in response if
Turkey recognized the independence of Nagorno Karabakh," Manvel
Sargsyan underscored.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Baku May Be Preparing Ground For Non-Constructive Stance On Karabakh

BAKU MAY BE PREPARING GROUND FOR NON-CONSTRUCTIVE STANCE ON KARABAKH

PanARMENIAN.Net
13.02.2007 17:12 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "Strangely the Moscow meeting of Armenian and
Azeri FMs Vartan Oskanian and Elmar Mamedyarov is being commented 20
days after," stated Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Arman Kirakosyan
commenting on his Azeri counterpart Araz Azimov, who labeled ministers’
meeting as a "step back". "We have already had a chance to label
the last stage of talks as constructive and hopeful, the Co-Chairs
agree with this. Most probably, the Azeri Deputy Foreign Minister
on the eve of the coming meeting between FMs prepares ground for
non-constructive stance for Baku," Arman Kirakosyan underlined,
the RA MFA press office reports.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Richard Hovannisian to Speak for NAASR on Feb. 23

PRESS RELEASE
National Association for Armenian Studies and Research
395 Concord Avenue
Belmont, MA 02478
Phone: 617-489-1610
Fax: 617-484-1759
E-mail: [email protected]
Contact: Marc A. Mamigonian

NAASR TO PRESENT ILLUSTRATED LECTURE BY PROF. RICHARD G. HOVANNISIAN

The National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR) will
present an illustrated lecture by Dr. Richard G. Hovannisian entitled
"The Changing Landscape of Historic Western Armenia: Reflections on a
Journey Into the Past," on Friday, February 23, at 8:00 p.m., at the
First Armenian Church Auditorium, 380 Concord Avenue, Belmont, MA.

Dr. Hovannisian is the Armenian Educational Foundation Professor of
Modern Armenian History at the University of California, Los Angeles.
He is the author of the four-volume history The Republic of Armenia,
Armenia on the Road to Independence, and has edited and contributed to
more than twenty books including The Armenian Image in History and
Literature, The Armenian Genocide in Perspective, The Armenian Genocide:
History, Politics, Ethics, The Armenian People from Ancient to Modern
Times, Remembrance and Denial, Looking Backward, Moving Forward, and six
volumes on historic Armenian cities and provinces. He was elected to
the National Academy of Sciences of Armenia in 1990.

The landscape of Historic Western Armenia is ever changing. The mystical
names of the villages, towns, and provinces of a now-vanished generation
remain deeply imbedded in the minds and hearts of many descendants. But
how similar are the imagined homeland and the existing landscape?

After many years of hesitation, Dr. Hovannisian set out on a quest to
reconcile the "imagined" with the "real." His travels took him through a
part of the historic provinces from Trebizond on the Black Sea to
Baiburt, Erzerum, Kemakh, Agn, Kharpert, Dersim, Palu, Mush, Bitlis, and
Van. He will present his impressions in an illustrated presentation in
this special event for the Greater Boston audience.

Following the discussion there will be a reception at the NAASR Center
and the Bookstore will be open. The NAASR Center and Headquarters is
located opposite the First Armenian Church and next to the U.S. Post
Office. Parking is available at the First Armenian Church and around
the NAASR building and in adjacent areas on Concord Avenue.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress