Pashinyan chairs Security Council meeting on regional situation

Armenia13:50, 9 March 2026
Read the article in: العربيةEspañolفارسیFrançaisՀայերենქართულიRussianTürkçe中文

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan chaired a Security Council meeting, his spokesperson said on Monday.

Pashinyan’s spokesperson, Nazeli Baghdasaryan, said the session was attended, among others, by Speaker of Parliament Alen Simonyan.

“The situation in the region was discussed. The prime minister was briefed on the progress in implementing the instructions issued earlier,” Baghdasaryan said on social media.

Read the article in: العربيةEspañolفارسیFrançaisՀայերենქართულიRussianTürkçe中文

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Lemkin Institute: Statement on Aliyev’s Recent Holocaust Analogy

Mar 12 2026
Statement on Aliyev’s Recent Holocaust Analogy 
March 12, 2026

The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention expresses grave concern over recent remarks by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in which he compared Armenian political detainees and prisoners of war to Nazi leaders convicted at the Nuremberg trials. During a 13 February interview with France 24 TV channel, Aliyev stated: “[c]alling for the release of the former [Nagorno-]Karabakh leaders is the same thing, even worse. Their crimes are worse than what the Nazis did during World War II.” Aliyev then argued that requests that he release Armenian detainees are akin to asking the Allies to free Nazi officials before their sentences. This statement is particularly dangerous in the context of the Israel-U.S. war of aggression against Iran, which has catapulted Azerbaijan into a position as a critical wartime ally, granting President Aliyev even greater impunity than he has thus far enjoyed.

Aliyev’s comparison does not reflect historical reality. It distorts it. It weaponizes it.

Aliyev’s comments were made just a few days after his meeting with U.S. Vice President JD Vance, in which Vance raised the issue of releasing Armenian hostages still being held by Baku. Aliyev’s comments demonstrate his ongoing disrespect for U.S. leadership, whose small requests on behalf of Armenians he routinely dismisses. His rhetoric is further a prime example of “mirroring,” a common tactic used by leaders accused of serious abuses of international law. While there is absolutely no credible evidence that any of the Armenians currently being held by Baku have committed any crimes, much less crimes against humanity and genocide (some of them are in fact POWs that Azerbaijan was supposed to return to Armenia in 2020), Aliyev and his government stand accused by credible observers and international legal experts, including at the Lemkin Institute, of genocide and crimes against humanity for conduct in Nagorno-Karabakh.

In September 2023, Azerbaijan’s military attacked and invaded the Republic of Artsakh, a de facto independent state with a population that was 99 percent Armenian, resulting in the forced displacement of the entire population of the region – more than 100,000 Armenians. Independent experts, including former International Criminal Court Prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo, have determined that Azerbaijan’s prior 10-month blockade and the September military assault demonstrated genocidal intent. The Lemkin Institute’s 127-page report, Risk Factors and Indicators of the Crime of Genocide in the Republic of Artsakh: Applying the UN Framework of Analysis for Atrocity Crimes to the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict, published on 5 September 2023, discusses Azerbaijan’s genocidal intent towards Artsakh Armenians in detail. The International Association of Genocide Scholars later also found that Azerbaijan had committed acts of genocide against Armenians. As part of its attack, Azerbaijan took many officials in the Artsakh government hostage. They have since been subjected to inhumane conditions of detention and show trials.

The Lemkin Institute considers President Aliyev to be the leader of a genocidal state – a state whose institutions are suffused with genocidal ideology, whose policies are formed by genocidal agendas, and whose genocidal rhetoric serves as an important ballast for domestic legitimacy. President Aliyev has institutionalized genocidal Armenophobia across state agencies and public life. Before 2023, he frequently referred to Armenians as “dogs,” “jackals,” “rabbits,” and terrorists in public speeches. After the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war, he built a “Trophy Park” in Baku to celebrate Azerbaijan’s supposed victory in the war, which included dehumanizing wax models of dead and dying Armenian soldiers with exaggerated, grotesque features that Azerbaijani visitors were encouraged to mock. Being one of the most openly and unapologetically racist acts of the 21st century, the Trophy Park garnered some attention and criticism in the Western world, and Azerbaijan was forced to remove the figures. However, the Trophy Park itself remains, as does the genocidal Armenophobia that informed it.

It appears that in exchange for a green light from the international community to invade Artsakh, the Azerbaijani President has had to tone down his Armenophobic rhetoric. Now, instead of shouting epithets, he pursues false charges against the Armenians still in his control and justifies his illegal actions by comparing them to Nazi war criminals and architects of genocide. The only “crime” committed by the Armenian representatives of the former Artsakh government being held in Baku is that they exercised their right to self-determination and sought to protect the Armenian residents of the enclave – whose presence dates back four thousand years – from Azerbaijani aggression. Unfortunately, the leaders of the world seem all too willing to countenance international crimes from the now respectable genocidal dictator whom their appeasement has enabled, even granting him the honor of hosting COP29 in 2024.

Beyond mirroring, President Aliyev’s remarks are illustrative of another common and very effective tactic employed by genocidal states – what psychologists call DARVO: Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender. Aliyev denies credible allegations of atrocity. He attacks Armenians as supposed war criminals. He then reverses reality by portraying Azerbaijan as the real victim and Armenians as existential threats. Such rhetoric does more than increase tensions. It encourages people to see genocide as justified.

Aliyev’s remarks constitute a dangerous form of genocide denial. In a few sentences that diminish the Holocaust, he simultaneously denies the destruction of Armenian life in Nagorno-Karabakh. He denies responsibility for the mass forced displacement his government engineered. And he inexcusably minimizes the Holocaust by abusing its memory as cover for his overall genocidal aims in the South Caucasus. The Holocaust, it must be remembered, was a systematic attempt to annihilate European Jewry and is one of the most comprehensive and all-encompassing genocides in human history. Six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis and millions more people were killed in the global war that the Nazis started. It is impossible for any international crime to be “worse than” the Holocaust, or, to quote Aliyev, “worse than what the Nazis did.” Invoking it to justify the continued detention of Armenian prisoners who were defending their homeland diminishes the Holocaust’s unique history and moral weight.

Genocide prevention requires accuracy. It does not allow leaders to use false comparisons to distract from present abuses. The international community must push back against President Aliyev’s ongoing genocidal rhetoric against Armenians and sovereign Armenian territory in order to support clarity within discussions of genocide. It must not tolerate his genocidal denial.

The continued detention and prosecution of Armenian prisoners in Azerbaijan raise serious concerns under international humanitarian law. The Third Geneva Convention requires humane treatment and prohibits coercive prosecutions of prisoners of war. Throughout the entire process of the trial, there has been evidence of torture of the Armenian prisoners by the relevant Azerbaijani agencies. Amnesty International and others have expressed concerns over the rights of the captured former leaders of Artsakh, particularly in terms of their right for fair trial. Azerbaijan must either release these detainees or provide transparent legal proceedings consistent with its international obligations.

History shows that perpetrators of atrocity often rely on extreme rhetoric to legitimize extraordinary measures. They cast targeted groups as criminals, terrorists, or existential enemies. They invoke past traumas to justify present repression. They frame collective punishment as a moral necessity. Such patterns function as early warning indicators of further abuse.

The Lemkin Institute calls on the Azerbaijani government to cease its dehumanizing, genocidal rhetoric against Armenians, to refrain from using the Holocaust to justify its crimes, and to release all Armenian prisoners immediately. Since President Aliyev has himself stated that he will not do this, the international community must pressure him to do so. Coordinated pressure must be placed specifically on the person of President Aliyev, who relies a great deal on the good graces of the Western world in particular for his continued power. If the Western world does not act and continues to embolden the Azerbaijani President, they will face even worse problems down the road. The greater the impunity extended to President Aliyev, the more he will seek to realize his dreams of a “Greater Azerbaijan” encompassing the current independent Republic of Armenia.

Genocide prevention requires clarity. Leaders who project their own actions onto victims promote mass atrocity rather than address it. They undermine justice rather than uphold it. The international community must not allow historical memory to be manipulated in service of ongoing genocidal agendas.

Pashinyan accused of fighting ‘Karapetyan’s image’ as court extends his house

Panorama, Armenia
Mar 14 2026

Armenia’s Anti-Corruption Court has extended by one month the house arrest of businessman and philanthropist Samvel Karapetyan, the prime ministerial candidate of the opposition Strong Armenia party.

Party council member Narek Karapetyan denounced the decision, alleging that Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan was seeking to compete “only against Karapetyan’s image” in the upcoming elections, describing the government’s approach as “fighting against a shadow”.

“But despite this, he will lose even this fight,” Karapetyan said, promising that the party would soon unveil its next steps. He insisted that “in three months, Samvel Karapetyan will be Armenia’s prime minister”.

Sonia Shiragian’s un[real] visit to Armenia

MediaMax, Armenia
Mar 14 2026

In December, I “unearthed” the article “Visit to Armenia,” published in The New Yorker in 1963. At the time, I hadn’t read it in its entirety, but I felt it was interesting and sent it for translation.

This week I finally found the time to read the translation – the day after writing this bittersweet column. I had barely gone through a few paragraphs when tears came to my eyes. Sonia Shiragian’s story was so beautiful and moving, so full of love for her father and his friends living in 1930s New York. Maria Sadoyan has translated it in such a way that you simply cannot believe the text was not originally written in Armenian. 

We read Sonia Shiragian’s story in today’s Armenia – an Armenia that Pashinyan calls “real” and does not hide the fact that he has launched an uncompromising struggle against memory. Sonia writes about what Armenians living in New York and dreaming of Armenia felt about a hundred years ago:

My father was not religious, but in speaking of Armenia he used the word “paradise” often. There were two paradises. One was a spot in the heavens above us with which the ancestral homeland could favorably be compared; the other, even more remote-I could, after all, see the sky-was Armenia itself. The two pictures blended in my imagination. Paradise descended to earth, and Armenia became a hallowed place on the roof of the world. There Mount Ararat-a lustrous, fragrant, green gold at its base-reached up so high into the heavenly blue that its peak was always covered by the whitest, purest snow. Noah’s ark had come to rest upon that peak, and there life had started all over again-the animals had marched down the mountain, the people had built fires and danced around Lake Sevan. 

What would those people do if they knew that a hundred years later the mention and depiction of Mount Ararat in the independent Armenia they longed for would become a problem?

I finished reading, wiped away my tears, and began looking for photos for the material. And then I was stunned: it turned out that Sonia Shiragian was the daughter of Arshavir Shiragian, a participant in Operation Nemesis. The very man about whom our Gohar Nalbandyan wrote an article two years ago for her Special Case series – “The most agile ‘fidget’ of Nemesis, Arshavir Shiragian.”

Even back then, looking at Arshavir’s photographs, I thought that the man who executed Jemal Azmi embodied Armenian nobility. And that article mentioned that Arshavir’s daughter had written a moving piece about her father for The New Yorker in the 1960s. Thus, the circle is closed.

Read Sonia Shiragian’s story. Read it and understand that memory and dreams can be killed only if you are willing to put up with it. 

I am more than certain that if Nikol Pashinyan and his teammates read this column, they will first grin, then assume a serious _expression_ and say: “These are emotions, and peace must be built cold-bloodedly.” And I will respond that it is emotions that create states and it is emotions that help states straighten their backs. Study history instead of fighting against it. 

Ara Tadevosyan is the director of Mediamax

https://mediamax.am/en/column/121671/

Verelq: “Kamurj” and Pan-Armenian Public Alliance will cooperate

“Kamurj” civic initiative and Pan-Armenian public alliance signed a memorandum of cooperation.

The cooperation of structures is aimed at consolidating the potential of Armenia and the Diaspora, protecting national interests, and forming a civil society with a clear position.

The “Kamurj” civic initiative and the Pan-Armenian public alliance will build strong and viable bridges, implement joint projects for the benefit and welfare of our country and people.

“Bridge” civil initiative




Seven Armenian artists gather in İstanbul ‘Meydan’ exhibition


UN chief calls on Hezbollah, Israel to stop the war

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres called on Israel and Hezbollah to “stop the war” at the start of a visit to Beirut, saying it was “no longer the time of armed groups.”

“My strong appeal to those parties, to Hezbollah and to Israel, is for a ceasefire to stop the war and… allow Lebanon to become a country independent… where its authorities have the monopoly on use of force,” Guterres said.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Defense Minister Papikyan meets EU Military Committee Chairman

Military19:52, 13 March 2026
Read the article in: العربيةFrançaisՀայերենRussian

On March 13, the Minister of Defence of the Republic of Armenia Suren Papikyan met with the Chairman of the EU Military Committee, General Sean Clancy in Brussels, the ministry said.

During the meeting issues related to military education, exercises, involvement in missions within the framework of cooperation between the EU and the Republic of Armenia in the field of security and defence, as well as other questions of mutual interest were discussed.

The parties also discussed a number of issues related to regional and international security.

Read the article in: العربيةFrançaisՀայերենRussian

Published by Armenpress, original at 

Armenpress: Foreign Intelligence Service warns of risk of foreign interference

Politics18:34, 13 March 2026
Read the article in: English

Armenia’s Foreign Intelligence Service has warned of a risk of foreign interference in the country’s upcoming June 7 parliamentary elections, saying intelligence indicates that “various actors” are attempting to meddle in the electoral process by pressuring Armenians abroad to support certain political forces.

In a statement issued exclusively to Armenpress on March 10, the service said it had received intelligence that, in a foreign country, various actors presenting themselves as representatives of that country’s special services were attempting to exert pressure on individuals of Armenian origin and citizens of the Republic of Armenia engaged in economic activities there.

According to the statement, they were allegedly attempting to induce them to undertake actions supporting certain political forces that have declared their intention to participate in the upcoming parliamentary elections in Armenia.

On the same day, the Police of Armenia’s Ministry of Internal Affairs said that, based on the statement issued by the Foreign Intelligence Service, a report had been sent to the Investigative Committee of the Republic of Armenia, which subsequently initiated criminal proceedings.

The issue became one of the most widely discussed topics in the public sphere, with different political forces interpreting the information in different ways.

Armenpress has addressed the Foreign Intelligence Service with several questions in order to clarify additional details.

– Your statement of March 10 did not contain any details, but it sparked heated public discussions on various aspects. Opinions and assessments were diverse, but the prevailing view was that the Foreign Intelligence Service’s statement should be clear so that people can orient themselves and that such statements should not cause alarm.

– The lack of details typical of intelligence service publications is, as a rule, due to the priority of protecting their activities, sources and methods. This does not mean, however, that clear operational information has not been and is not being transmitted to the competent law enforcement bodies of the Republic of Armenia. This is also evidenced by statements made by both the Police of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Armenia and the Investigative Committee of the Republic of Armenia.

As for the claims about alarm, the Service’s goal is to inform our compatriots about such seemingly illegal processes. Within the framework of the powers vested in it by law, the Service carries out actions to prevent and counter the materialization of foreign threats against the Republic of Armenia and its citizens, and this statement should be perceived as one such action. Therefore, the circles carrying out such seemingly illegal actions may have reason to be alarmed.

– Since the statement says that pressure is being exerted on the citizens of the Republic of Armenia to support certain political forces, we also ask you to clarify which forces you are referring to, as the opposition interprets the statement as allegedly “preparing the ground for actions against the opposition” or “trying to provide an advantage for the ruling power.”

– The mandate of the Service is defined by law and includes the protection of the individual, society and the state from external threats, as well as the collection and processing of information for this purpose. Therefore, the mandate of the Service is not conditioned or constrained by the alignment of political forces or the wishes of those forces, neither the ruling nor the opposition. According to the available information, the pressure is aimed at securing support for certain opposition forces.

– Based on your statement, the Investigative Committee initiated criminal proceedings, stating that representatives of various political forces, large businessmen and criminal authorities are exerting pressure on citizens of the Republic of Armenia while acting on behalf of the special services of that country. Does the Investigative Committee have any information on whether the special services of that country are involved in this process? Can we say that in this case we are also dealing with the threat of external interference in the upcoming elections in the Republic of Armenia?

– The information received indicates that these actions pose a risk of external interference in the upcoming democratic elections in our country.

– We would also like to ask you to provide information on what work the Foreign Intelligence Service has carried out since the announcement and what new details, if any, have become known.

– The Service continues to take measures within the framework of its powers to address the issues set before it by law and, naturally, cooperates with all state bodies of the Republic of Armenia.

Read the article in: English

Published by Armenpress, original at 

We want one thing, yours is to thank Aliyev. Abovyan: Ruby

CP member R. Rubinyan spoke again. Unfortunately, these people do not imagine the rules of normal coexistence, norms of a humane game. I have to answer.

Whatever accusations are leveled against any opposition force or leader, any of them.

1. Artsakh was not handed over

2. The Azerbaijani army did not leave Jermuk and Armenian territories

3. He did not sacrifice five thousand victims, he did not sacrifice an entire generation

4. He did not turn a whole people against each other

5. He did not organize attacks against the Armenian Apostolic Church at the behest of the Turks

6. He did not say thank you to Aliyev, who killed thousands of Armenian boys.

7. He did not say thank you to Aliyev, who destroyed our cities and villages, and to Aliyev, who turned Amaras and Gandzasar into a barn.

8. The soul of Enver Pasha glorified Erdogan did not receive pre-election support from the government

9. He did not promise the “return” of 300,000 Azerbaijanis to Armenia

10. …The list of other achievements of this government is left to R. Rubinyan.

We want one thing. to form a new government that, instead of thanking Aliyev, will negotiate with dignity to solve complex problems peacefully, to get guaranteed peace. What we want is a dignified settlement and mutually beneficial progress of relations with Turkey and all neighbors.

What we want, yes, is mutually beneficial, long-term and deep cooperation with Russia, USA, EU, Belarus, China, Iran, India and everyone who considers us friends, as a result of which our country will have guaranteed peace and our people will have a prosperous life.

I apply to R. Rubinyan. the reason for your outburst is understandable. the numbers of the last public opinion poll and the public mood towards you forced you to express that text. But I have a direct question. Is it a shame to have normal relations with Russia and Belarus, or to say thank you day and night to Aliyev, who killed you and destroyed your cities and villages? Thank you for what?


Political analyst Arman Abovyan



https://verelq.am/hy/node/170792?fbclid=IwY2xjawQh0alleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEeHIQIZS13wS2XyHcNHHO1vPKtDzN_bn6Ij-u5gUYqBNOfYrIW1mnJG8uvW24_aem_RmCXu4MPvN4ZniQAsQA85Q