UN GA President Labels Georgia As Aggressor, Slams U.S.

UN GA PRESIDENT LABELS GEORGIA AS AGGRESSOR, SLAMS U.S.

PanARMENIAN.Net
17.09.2008 18:28 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ A new session of the United Nations General Assembly
has opened in New York, with a sharp attack on the United States by
the assembly’s new president.

Former Nicaraguan foreign minister Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann mentioned
the United States by name only a few times, but made it clear who
his target was.

D’Escoto says it is "undeniable" that some members of the Security
Council have "an addiction to war," and he says they are threatening
international peace and security. In a scarcely veiled reference
to President George W. Bush’s administration, d’Escoto also said no
nation has the right "to decide on its own which states are sponsors
of terrorism, and which are not."

"It is a sad but undeniable fact that serious breaches of the peace
and threats to international peace and security are being perpetrated
by some members of the Security Council that seem unable to break
what appears like an addiction to war," he said.

"By now, over 1.2 million people have died as a direct consequence
of that aggression and occupation," d’Escoto said about the U.S.-led
war in Iraq.

"They think they can operate the veto power without thinking about
the consequences," France Presse quoted the UN GA new president as
speaking to a Security Council representative.

Asked by an American reporter whether Russia violated the UN Charter
by intruding into Georgia, he said that it was Georgia that committed
an act of aggression against South Ossetia and violated UN Charter.

As reported by the UN news center, a team comprising representatives
of key United Nations agencies is heading to South Ossetia and other
areas affected by the recent conflict in Georgia, the world body
announced today, adding that a broader fact-finding mission to the
region is also being planned.

The objective of the 17 to 20 September mission "is to gain first-hand
knowledge of the humanitarian and human rights situations and needs on
the ground, including the position of those displaced by the conflict
and other vulnerable groups," according to a statement issued by
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s spokesperson.

The UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) estimates some 192,000
people were forced to flee their homes during the conflict that began
on 8 August and involved Georgia, South Ossetian and Russian forces.

The upcoming mission, coordinated with the Russian and Georgian
authorities, will visit Moscow, South Ossetia and Tbilisi. The results
will feed into the revision of the nearly $59 million humanitarian
flash appeal launched by the UN and its partners on 18 August to aid
victims of the conflict.

Session Of Commission Coordinating Works Within The Framework Of Arm

SESSION OF COMMISSION COORDINATING WORKS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF ARMENIA’S COOPERATION WITH EUROPEAN ESTABLISHMENTS TAKES PLACE

ARMENPRESS
Sep 16, 2008

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 16, ARMENPRESS: Session of the commission set up
to coordinate the works within the framework of cooperation of Armenia
with the European establishments took place today chaired by the head
of the commission, Secretary General of the National Security Council
Arthur Baghdasarian.

Presidential press service told Armenpress that during the session the
participants discussed issues on Armenia’s cooperation with European
establishments. Armenian deputy foreign minister Gegham Gharibjanian,
deputy economy minister Vahe Danielian, deputy defense minister Ara
Nazinian made reports on the events held by the EU programs and NATO
Individual Partnership Action Plan Program.

The commission decided to take into consideration the reports and
assign the ministries to present reports over the work conducted
by now as well as prepare suggestions for the implementation of the
commitments assumed by Armenia.

Arthur Baghdasarian presented the priorities of the work carried out
with the EU and European establishments and expected that effective
work will be carried out for the implementation of the programs. He
said the president of the country will control the implementation of
the work.

Turkey Will Never Recognize Armenian Genocide To Improve Relations W

TURKEY WILL NEVER RECOGNIZE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE TO IMPROVE RELATIONS WITH YEREVAN, AKP MEMBER SAYS

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
15.09.2008 17:44 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Turkey will never recognize the Armenian Genocide
to improve its relations with Yerevan, said an executive of the ruling
Justice & Development (AK) Party.

Speaking at the panel discussion "Whither Turkey" hosted by the
Eastern Institute during the Krynica Economic Forum, one of the most
prestigious forums in Eastern Europe, in Polish capital city of Warsaw,
Egemen Bagis, deputy chairman of the AK Party, said, "Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan proposed Armenia to establish a joint
commission with the participation of the third countries and to open
archives. Armenia has not yet given a response to Turkey’s proposal."

"Turkish President Abdullah Gul’s paying a visit to Armenia upon
invitation of Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan is the most concrete
sign of Turkey’s good-will. On the other hand, more than one million
documents examined upon directives of Turkey proved that those bitter
events were not genocide, but a civil war during a world war," he said,
the Anatoly news agency reports.

Juries Return In Eurovision Revamp

JURIES RETURN IN EUROVISION REVAMP

The Press Association
Sept 15 2008
UK

Juries are to return to next year’s Eurovision Song Contest, it has
been announced, following criticism of tactical voting by former
eastern bloc countries.

The world-famous contest has been labelled a politically-motivated
farce because of the decision by some countries to vote together.

Sir Terry Wogan had threatened to quit the commentating job he has
held for 37 years because of the repeated tactical voting. Now it
has been announced that the 2009 final, due to take place in Moscow,
will feature votes from viewers as well as a jury.

Sir Terry had called for a return to juries to judge the contest
after Russia won this year’s contest, while the UK, with Andy Abraham,
came last.

Russia received the maximum 12 points from former Soviet states
Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus and Armenia, as well
as Israel.

The UK has only finished in the top 10 once in the last 10 contests
and has finished outside the top 20 four times in that period.

Sir Terry has criticised the contest for becoming "ridiculous",
stating: "The UK and the BBC has to decide whether they want to
take part anymore. I don’t want to be presiding over yet another
debacle… Russia were going to be the political winners from the
beginning."

A BBC spokeswoman said: "We are waiting with interest to hear the
details of how the mix of jury and telephone voting will work."

Ruurd Bierman, chairman of the Eurovision reference group, said:
"We strongly believe in televoting as a way of measuring the opinion
of our millions of viewers across Europe. After the public debate
about neighbour and diaspora voting, we decided to give the national
juries a say in the outcome of the 2009 Eurovision Song Contest."

Svante Stockselius, executive supervisor of the Eurovision Song
Contest, said: "Nothing is more democratic than the vote of the
public. But a jury takes the opportunity to listen to the songs
several times, before they make up their minds. In Belgrade, we saw
a difference in judgment of the public and the back-up juries, and
we believe a combination will make the show more interesting."

Europe and Moscow, the Danger Hour

Corriere della Sera, Italy
Sept 11 2008

Europe and Moscow, the Danger Hour

by Alberto Ronchey

If Mikheil Saakashvili’s Georgian Government made a mistake in the
August war with its military operation against separatism in South
Ossetia, Vladimir Putin has made an even more serious mistake with the
prolonged invasion of Georgia, a fully sovereign country. That is the
prevailing opinion where the apportionment of blame is concerned. But
what are the consequences?

For the time being the international dispute seems to be restricted to
posturing: witness the display of fleets in the Black Sea, as well as
Russia’s recent decision to deploy 7,600 troops in the separatist
regions. Putin has exposed the excessive whimsicality and the
inconsistencies in Western diplomacy. But now, according to an
analysis conducted by several observers, there are some dangerous
unknowns looming for Moscow. Pro-Russian South Ossetia, drunk on
triumph, may clash with restless Ingushetia. Chechnya appears to have
been tamed, but not completely and in any case only after the
demolition of Groznyy, an experiment that cannot be repeated in any
other situation. The way Russia is looming over the Caucasus, posing
as "big brother," is sparking not only apprehension but mistrustful
responses also on the part of the Armenians and of the Azeris. And
that is not all. Once South Ossetia’s and Abkhazia’s independence from
Georgia has been sanctioned by decree from Moscow, we may well wonder
how many still latent rebellions or how many disputes over the right
to secede may hit the Russian Federation itself, with its myriad
ethnic groups spread out over as many autonomous republics on two
continents.

The August war has also caused Moscow some more or less "collateral"
financial damage. Finance Minister Aleksey Kudrin himself acknowledged
that in the first two days after the invasion of Georgia, some 7
billion dollars worth of foreign capital was taken out of Russia. Then
it was learned that over the days following the invasion Moscow’s
currency reserves dropped by some 16.4 billion dollars. Naturally, the
energy superpower still has huge resources to bring effective pressure
to bear in furthering its influence on the international stage, albeit
not without risk. Yet despite Putin’s optimism, Russia’s domestic
economy does not appear to be at all stable, with inflation running at
14.7 per cent.

In strategic and geopolitical terms, the biggest controversy today is
over whether or not to take Georgia into NATO along with Ukraine (and
this, despite the fact that Ukraine is split between pro-Russians and
pro-Westerners). There is no majority of European governments in
agreement over the issue, because it is an issue that demands special
caution. Pushing NATO’s western borders even closer to Russia entails
the danger of triggering an exasperated spurt of national pride on
"Greater Russia’s" part. And we are not just talking about Putin’s or
the military oligarchy’s neonationalism, but about a grassroots
sentiment centuries old.

This raises a complex dilemma for the West. Might failing to further
expand NATO placate the Russian patriots, who are irritated enough as
it is with "the volteface of history" which smashed Moscow’s
traditional power in the nineties? Or might Western moderation not
encourage the nationalist extremists also in their claiming the right
to enforce a return to the doctrine of "limited sovereignty" on their
neighbours? Faced with questions like that, we must steer clear of
formulating a hasty response.

[translated from Italian]

Attention Of Pace To Armenia Declines Because Of Georgian Events

ATTENTION OF PACE TO ARMENIA DECLINES BECAUSE OF GEORGIAN EVENTS

Noyan Tapan

Se p 12, 2008

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 12, NOYAN TAPAN. A brief dicsussion on Armenia
at the September 11 sitting of the PACE Monitoring Committee was
conditioned by the fact that the attention to Armenia has declined as
a result of the conflict between Georgia and South Ossetia. This was
pointed out by representatives of various political forces of the RA
National Assembly during the September 12 parliamentary briefings.

The member of "Prosperous Armenia" faction Naira Zohrabian said that
Armenian authorities have made progress in the fulfilment of PACE
resolutions 1609 and 1620 which is evident from the fact that the
problem of Armenia will not be discussed by urgent order at the PACE
plenary session scheduled for late September.

In the opinion of the member of "Orinats Yerkir Party" faction
Hovhannes Margarian, some progress has been registered, although
there are numerous unsolved problems. The deputy said that the CE
Commissioner for Human Right spoke about the necessity to create
a fact-finding group of experts to conduct an inquiry into the
March 1 events. The group will be composed of an equal number of
representatives of the ruling coalition, "Heritage" faction and the
Armenian National Congress.

In the words of the member of "Heritage" faction Zaruhi Postanjian,
progress in the fulfilment of the indicated points of PACE resolitons
is out of the question. Moreover, the addition that the parliament
passed yesterday to the Law on Television and Radio was a regress.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=117377

Serzh Sarsgyan: Attempts To Change OSCE MG Format Can Cause Serious

SERZH SARSGYAN: ATTEMPTS TO CHANGE OSCE MG FORMAT CAN CAUSE SERIOUS PROBLEMS

PanARMENIAN.Net
11.09.2008 16:55 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian President Serzh Sarsgyan met Thursday
with Greek Foreign Minister’s commissioner Nicolaos Kalantzianos,
the RA leader’s press office told PanARMENIAN.Net.

"I arrived in Armenia to discuss your expectations from Greek
presidency in the OSCE next year and also to exchange views on recent
regional developments," Mr Kalantzianos said.

For his part, President Sargsyan said that Armenia attaches importance
to cooperation with the OSCE, whose Minsk Group deals with resolution
of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. "The state of neither peace nor
war has been maintained for 14 years thanks to the MG, which has the
potential to resolve the conflict, while attempts to transfer the
process to other instances can cause serious problems," he said.

The two also discussed the Armenian-Greek cooperation.

World Vision Armenia To Mark 20th Anniversary On Sep 15

WORLD VISION ARMENIA TO MARK 20TH ANNIVERSARY ON SEP 15

ARKA
Sep 10, 2008

YEREVAN, September 10. /ARKA/. The World Vision Armenia NGO marks its
20th anniversary on September 15, the organization’s press service
reports.

WVA works in six Armenian regions and 130 communities in Yerevan,
assisting over 22,000 children and families. WVA programs aim
at improving the country’s healthcare system, fostering economic
development, protecting children and preserving Christian traditions.

Local officials, guests form Diaspora, international donors,
representatives of local and foreign non-profit organizations, as well
as WVI President Dean Hirsch and WVA Country Director Mark Kelly will
participate in the September 15 reception.

The organization will briefly introduce the guest to its achievements
and nearer-term goals. WVA will show a short documentary on
the problems of rural children and inmates of Gyumri and Yerevan
children’s homes.

World Vision Global Fund has granted $7.2mln to WVA to help Armenia’s
Healthcare Ministry carry out HIV/AIDS prevention programs.

USAID has donated $6.2mln to WVA programs in Armenia’s remote regions.

Razmik Zohrabian: Rams Never Lead An Army Of Lions

RAZMIK ZOHRABIAN: RAMS NEVER LEAD AN ARMY OF LIONS

Noyan Tapan

Se p 10, 2008

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 10, NOYAN TAPAN. The Republican Party of Armenia
(RPA) made a decision about inexpediency of the further activities of
Tigran Torosian as the speaker of the RA National Assembly based on
the tactics of the party’s personnel policy, the deputy chairman of
RPA Razmik Zohrabian said at the September 9 press conference at Hayeli
Club. "We decide our personnel policy themselves within the party. Our
party has strict regulations and discipline, and we all must obey it,"
he added, not explaining the reason for the "inexpediency".

He drew a parallel with a football team: when the coach changes
a player, it does not mean that he plays badly. According to him,
T. Torosian worked quite well, while holding that post, and there is
no problem of justifying or not justifying. "The chairman proposed,
while the executive body discussed and agreed," he noted. In the
words of R. Zohrabian, the party has a strong leader who unites many
leaders. "A strong person should lead the strong, it never happens
that rams lead an army of lions. We obey a strong leader, especially
as he is the president of the country and knows many state secrets,
maybe there is something that was not said at the executive body,
this is the right of the country’s president," he said.

To recap, the decision to replace T. Torosian by a newly-elected deputy
of the National Assembly, the former chief of the RA presidential
staff Hovik Abrahamian has to be approved at the sitting of the RPA
board scheduled for September 16.

R. Zohrabian did not consider the visit of Turkish President Abdullah
Gul to Armenia as a diplomatic victory. "It was just a start of
relations, and we welcome it," he said.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=117270

Project Russia And Domino Effect

PROJECT RUSSIA AND DOMINO EFFECT
by Sergei Markedonov

WPS Agency, Russia
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
September 10, 2008 Wednesday

WILL SELF-DETERMINATION OF ABKHAZIA AND SOUTH OSSETIA SET A PRECEDENT
FOR SEPARATIST MOVEMENTS IN THE POST-SOVIET ZONE?; Recognition of
South Ossetia and Abkhazia will have no effect on other countries
but may be used against Russia itself.

A precedent was set by which the borders of the former republics
of the erstwhile USSR could be altered. What the post-Soviet world
counted on as unfaltering ever since December 1991 is history now. The
argument that Russia alone recognized two formerly Georgian autonomies
carries no weight. Turkey alone recognized the Turkish Republic of
North Cyprus in 1983, but this formation has been a major player in
the Black Sea – Mediterranean Sea politics ever since. The fact that
South Ossetia and Abkhazia are recognized by a permanent member of
the UN Security Council that wields veto power, an Atomic Club member,
and a global player to boot only strengthens their positions.

The self-determination of South Ossetia and Abkhazia raises some
delicate questions. Will it set a precedent for separatist or
nationalist movements on post-Soviet territory? Will the recognition
of Abkhazia and South Ossetia by Moscow cause the so called Domino
Effect in Russia itself and particularly in the Russian Caucasus? The
ethnic-political situation in Georgia is anything but ideal because
its Javakhetia has predominantly Armenian population, Kvemo Kartli is
mostly Azerbaijani, and the Panki Gorge is where the Kista Chechens
have always lived.

Practically every CIS state has its own skeleton in the "ethnic"
cupboard. Moldova and Azerbaijan have unsolved territorial conflict
areas on their territories. Wayward Trans-Dniester region and
Nagorno-Karabakh meanwhile design their own tactics and strategies
of getting the coveted international recognition. Situation in the
Russian Caucasus (Ingushetia, Dagestan) is quite volatile too.

Russians in Ukraine and Kazakhstan, Uzbeks in Kyrgyzstan, Ukrainians in
Moldova, representatives of Caucasus peoples in Russia and Azerbaijan
do not always feel at home in their new post-Soviet countries for
various reasons (which does not really matter.) Hence the quite
reticent reaction in the post-Soviet republics to the recognition of
Abkhazia and South Ossetia as sovereign states.

Squashing emotions over the so called Domino Effect, however, we
must admit that successful self-determination of South Ossetia and
Abkhazia is going to have no visible effect on territorial integrity
of any state in Eurasia.

It will take grave administrative and political errors for
separatism to revive in Russia. Errors are made of course, and
not just in the Caucasus alone. Fortunately, the situation is not
yet irreversible. Success of Project Russia depends on ourselves –
powers-that-be and civil society – and on nobody else. A precedent,
however, is a different matter. Sure, formally recognizing two Georgian
autonomies as foreign states, the Kremlin took certain risks and knew
it. After all, this precedent may be used against Russia any moment
now. The Caucasus these days is in grave danger from radical Islam,
closeness of the regional authorities and their disinclination to apply
modern methods of governance and initiate a dialogue with society.

It is necessary to draw a line between the policy of the United
States (and, to a lesser extent, the EU) we will have to try and
negate on the one hand and the demand for political modernization of
the country. The absence of this "division" will only facilitate the
degradation of the Russian officialdom. It and only it will make the
precedent explode in Russia’s face.