"Heritage" Party: 2010 Draft State Budget Of Armenia Is Unacceptable

"HERITAGE" PARTY: 2010 DRAFT STATE BUDGET OF ARMENIA IS UNACCEPTABLE AND MYOPIC

Noyan Tapan
Nov 13, 2009

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 13, NOYAN TAPAN. The 2010 draft state budget of
Armenia is unacceptable and myopic, as it does not aim at implementing
an anticrisis policy, is said in the November 13 statement of
"Heritage" Party’s parliamentary faction.

"Heritage" notes that the burden of the state debt prevails in the
2010 state budget of the RA, and the share of mining industry as
well as the share of construction and service sectors in the economic
infrastructures are dominant. The budget serves the officials and the
oligarchical-monopolistic vicious system and shows the authorities’
inability to fight the shadow economy and force big business to
pay the full amount of taxes. The budget does not contribute to the
development of various branches of the Armenian economy, especially
the industry, the agrarian sector, and SMEs. It is not conducive to
the efficiency of agricultural produce sale and processing sector,
which makes the development of diversified production impossible.

Underlining that the 2010 state budget’s deficit exceeds 4.5folf the
2009 index, "Heritage" says the budget is unable to ensure solution
of social problems of the country’s population and to raise the living
standard of the poor and the vulnerable groups.

"Heritage" faction is deeply concerned about the negative and declining
nature of the 2010 state budget presented by the government and the
authorities’ incapacity to overcome the challanges facing the Republic
of Armenia," the statement reads.

Dashnak Genocide Bill Stalls In Armenian Parliament

DASHNAK GENOCIDE BILL STALLS IN ARMENIAN PARLIAMENT
Irina Hovannisian

Armenialiberty.org
Nov 13 2009

Armenia — David Harutiunian, chairman of the parliament committee
on legal affairs.

A key committee of the National Assembly effectively rejected on
Friday a proposal by the opposition Armenian Revolutionary Federation
(Dashnaktsutyun) to criminalize public statements denying that the
1915 massacres of Armenians in Ottoman Turkey constituted genocide.

Armenia’s Criminal Code already carries heavy fines and up to four
years’ imprisonment for public denial of genocides and "other crimes
against humanity." An amendment tabled by Dashnaktsutyun last month
would extend the maximum punishment to five years and apply it to
anyone "denying, playing down, approving or justifying the genocide
of Armenians in Ottoman Turkey and Western Armenia."

Dashnaktsutyun leaders acknowledge that the bill is directly connected
with the recent agreements to normalize Armenia’s relations with
Turkey that have been strongly condemned by the nationalist party.

They say it is specifically directed against a Turkish-Armenian
"subcommission" of historians envisaged by one of the agreements.

It would be tasked with studying the extermination of the Ottoman
Empire’s sizable Armenian population. Dashnaktsutyun and other
critics of the deal say the very existence of such a body would
call into question the fact of the genocide, a claim denied by the
Yerevan government.

In a written opinion submitted to the Armenian parliament committee
on legal affairs this week, the Ministry of Justice objected to the
Dashnaktsutyun bill and essentially upheld the existing Criminal Code
clause relating to genocide denial. The committee on Friday postponed
the bill’s consideration by at least two months, meaning that the
proposed amendment will not reach the parliament floor before February.

The committee chairman, David Harutiunian, made no secret of his strong
opposition to the measure, saying that it would create "extremely
serious problems" in the ongoing Turkish-Armenian negotiations. He
said its passage would lead the Turkish authorities to resume heavy
enforcement of a controversial law makes it a crime to "insult the
Turkish nation." The law, watered down last year, has been used in
the prosecution of prominent Turks who have questioned the official
Turkish version of the events of 1915.

Harutiunian also argued that by adopting the amendment drafted by
Dashnaktsutyun the National Assembly would give the impression that
there is now a "serious movement" within Armenian that denies the
genocidal character of those events. "Besides, I believe Armenia’s
position on this issue is so strong that we don’t need any additional
tools of defense in the shape of criminal liability," the former
justice minister said at a committee meeting. "The stronger party
doesn’t need such tools."

"I don’t see that confidence about our strength," Vahan Hovannisian,
the leader of the Dashnaktsutyun faction in the parliament, countered,
referring to President Serzh Sarkisian’s conciliatory policy towards
Turkey. He said the October 10 signing of the Turkish-Armenian
protocols in Zurich was "a sign of weakness" on the part of Yerevan.

Consuelo Vidal Is Leaving Armenia Wit Pleasant Memories

CONSUELO VIDAL IS LEAVING ARMENIA WIT PLEASANT MEMORIES

ArmInfo
2009-11-12 18:02:00

ArmInfo. Today, President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan received UN
Resident Coordinator/UNDP Resident Representative to Armenia Consuelo
Vidal who is completing her diplomatic mission in our country.

As the Armenian presidential pres service reports, S. Sargsyan thanked
C. Vidal for the work done in the Republic over four years and the
assistance to the development programmes in Armenia. The president
attached great importance to the programmes carried out by different
UN agencies and said: ‘The matter concerns not only the funds. The
experience, involvement and an opportunity for comparison are much
more important’.

For her part, C. Vidal expressed gratitude for Armenia’s excellent
cooperation with UNDP. According to her, she is leaving the country
with the most pleasant memories. UN Resident Coordinator added that
she will remain Armenia’s friend forever. The parties exchanged
opinions concerning proportional development of Armenia’s regions,
as well as the forthcoming population census in 2010.

Central Bank Of Armenia Leaves Refinancing Rate Unchanged At 5%

CENTRAL BANK OF ARMENIA LEAVES REFINANCING RATE UNCHANGED AT 5%

ARKA
Nov 11, 2009

YEREVAN, November 11, /ARKA/. The Central Bank of Armenia (CBA) decided
Tuesday to leave unchanged its refinancing rate at 5%, the CBA’s press
office said to ARKA. The press office said inflation rate grew by 0.5%
in October against September. As a result the annual inflation rate
rose to 3.5%.

A statement by the Central Bank said inflation behavior and processes
in macroeconomic environment were in tune with its earlier forecasts.

Moderate external inflationary pressures continued throughout the
period caused by the growing trend of world prices for mining and
some food products.

On September 8, 2009 the Central Bank of Armenia lowered the
refinancing rate by 0.25 percentage points to 5%. It was the seventh
consecutive lowering of the refinancing rate since March 3 when the
Central Bank reversed to the floating exchange rate of the national
currency Dram against hard currencies raising also the refinancing
rate by one percentage point to 7.75%.

ANKARA: Historic Breakthrough Controversies: Will Azerbaijani Lands

HISTORIC BREAKTHROUGH CONTROVERSIES: WILL AZERBAIJANI LANDS BE FREE SOON?
By Leila Alieva

Today’s Zaman
1-109-historic-breakthrough-controversies-will-aze rbaijani-lands-be-free-soon-by-leila-alieva.html
N ov 10 2009
Turkey

Turkish President Abdullah Gul (L) with his Armenian counterpart,
Serzh Sarksyan (R), before their meeting in Turkey on Oct. 14.

The Caucasus region is once more at the eve of events of historical
significance — a century-old conflict between Armenia and Turkey
may be coming to an end.

While leading politicians and the public in Europe and the US are
watching events with excitement and judicious appraisal, the nearly 1
million Azerbaijani internally displaced persons (IDP) and refugees
wonder with growing concern whether the chances for their right to
return to their lands and homes will decrease with these much-praised
developments.

The biggest controversy is developing around opening the Armenia-Turkey
border, as there are opposing opinions as to whether it will have a
positive or negative effect on the resolution of the major conflict
in the region.

While Azerbaijan’s lack of economic relations with Armenia does not
cause any questions, Turkey’s closure of its borders with Armenia,
rightly perceiving the escalation of war in 1992-1993 as a threat
to regional security, intentionally or unintentionally came as
a counterbalance to Russian military involvement on the side of
Armenia and sanctions of the US government, which denied any aid to
the democratically elected government of Azerbaijan.

However, the absence of economic relations with Armenia has an even
deeper meaning, which can be understood in the context of the root
causes of post-Soviet conflicts. The Soviet centralized economy
deprived the Caucasian republics of a sense of interdependency on
each other. All ties and trade relations between the republics were
mediated by Moscow through an authoritarian command system, which led
to the republics’ underestimation of the degree of their dependence
on each other. Armenia, for instance, was sure that regardless of
the state of affairs with Azerbaijan, that nation would supply oil
or gas to the republic, even at the expense of their own citizens,
under pressure from Moscow.

In fact, this perception has developed in the post-Soviet era.

Regardless of their occupation and ethnic cleansing of Nagorno-Karabakh
and seven more regions of Azerbaijan, Armenia was sure that there
always would be Moscow, Brussels or Washington to pressure Azerbaijan
to restore economic relations without reciprocal acts of compromise
by Yerevan. In this sense, Turkey’s act of closing its borders was an
important signal to Armenia: one cannot enjoy the fruits of cooperation
with neighbors without respect for their borders and sovereignty.

A great deal of aid from the US since 1991 and significant aid from
Europe, along with remittances and investments from the diaspora,
has somewhat neutralized the effect of the absence of trade with
its neighbors and fed into Armenia’s feeling that it is possible to
survive without regulating relations with its neighbors.

And the last meaning of the closed borders is that although it
bears a character of sanctions it is an alternative to a military
way of resolving the conflict. Thus, the opening of the borders by
Turkey may weaken the effect of the trade sanctions as a peaceful
regulator of international relations by narrowing the space for
non-military conflict resolution and increasing the chances of a
forceful confrontation seeking the return of the lands.

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict broke out in the course of the collapse
of the Soviet Union, the first conflict to create deep divisions in
the region and prevent South Caucasus states from uniting, unlike
the Baltic states. After the open and bloody war which marked the
beginning of the two states’ independence, the conflict reached its
long-standing stalemate, which froze developments in the region in
terms of security, politics and economics.

Since then, the South Caucasus knot has represented a complex
mixture of local, regional and international interests, where the
most pressing issue of the primary victims of the conflict — those
displaced and deported — has been largely left behind the scenes of
political intrigue.

Conflict overshadowed by rapproachment

The issue of ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan
somehow became overshadowed by the resolution of historically tense
Armenian-Turkish relations, mainly because the latter was on the
agenda of more powerful actors and thus seemed easier to resolve.

The ongoing processes in the region create an impression that for
Europe, the issue of how Turkey addresses its past and its Christian
neighbor has been more important than the fact of Armenia’s present
occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh and seven more regions of the other
neighboring state. Indeed, while an open intervention by Russia in
Georgia caused immediate reactions from the European Union, followed
by the dispatch of a monitoring group and intense negotiations with
Russia at the highest level of the EU, the resolution of the Karabakh
conflict was given to the framework of the Organization for Security
and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the mechanism of which contributed
to the "frozenness" of the status quo, where military advances by one
party (Armenia) in violation of the state border of Azerbaijan are used
as a bargaining tool in negotiations. This created a precedent, which
probably inspired Russia 14 years later to move into the territory
of another Caucasus state.

The secrecy of the Armenian-Turkish bilateral negotiations was the
one of the causes of reservations related to the generally positive
assessment of this process, which may, according to the promoters of
this rapprochement, create a favorable environment for the resolution
of the Karabakh conflict. But the opposite is also true: it may
not necessarily lead to the quick resolution of the conflict if
it legitimizes selective recognition by Armenia of its neighbors’
borders, weakens the effect on the economy and makes the party
violating borders more intransigent.

Moreover, if the Armenian-Turkish rapprochement, which contains an
important provision on border recognition, remains without similar
recognition in the other case — the recognition of Azerbaijan’s
borders by Armenia — it looks as if one party — Turkey — is
resolving its historical issues with Armenia at Azerbaijan’s expense.

In this political context, the recently observed tensions in
Azerbaijani-Turkish relations would look quite natural, if not the
extreme form of its expression and the fact that it took place at
the level of state actors. The incident with the national flags could
signal an emotionally charged popular reaction, if not the unanimously
expressed opinion of 40 prominent public leaders in Azerbaijan who in
a recently issued statement announced that they found it unacceptable
that the flags had been removed from monuments, Turkish enterprises and
educational institutions in Baku and noted that "the people of Turkey
can be sure that nothing and nobody can spoil our brotherly relations."

This confirms a major flaw in the international approach to resolving
conflicts in the region, where the public plays very little role,
if at all, in the "big deals" between the actors in the region.

The positive event — the signing of the Armenian-Turkish protocols
— initiated from above rather than from below, besides lacking the
specific vision of its implication for the major regional conflict,
may have little influence in geopolitical terms on long-term stability
and its short-term humanitarian implications. This is even more so
if the interests of the primary victims of the current situation —
refugees and IDPs from the occupied territories and other victims of
the conflict — are not viewed as the most pressing issue today.

In this regard, the uncertain outcome of the resolution of the Karabakh
conflict and the long awaited Turkish-Armenian rapprochement comes at
too high a cost for those who have been suffering from the present,
not the past, conflict.

————————————— —————————————–
*Leila Alieva is the president of the Center for National and
International Studies in Baku.

http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-19248

No Panic, Health Minister Says

NO PANIC, HEALTH MINISTER SAYS

news.am
Nov 10 2009
Armenia

Do not spread panic, just be cautious. The situation is under
control in Armenia," RA Minister of Health Harutyun Kushkyan stated,
addressing the public. According to him, Armenia has laboratories
for identifying the A/H1N1 virus, as well as sufficient amount of
medicines for swine flue.

The Minister said that the Armenian companies importing medicines are
ready to import the necessary amount of vaccines, as the World Health
Organization promised vaccines to Armenia next year. "The Ministry of
Health is negotiating with the WHO for changing the terms of supply,
as the first swine flue cases have been registered in Armenia,"
Kushkyan said. The Minister said that special vaccines, with minimum
side effects, will be purchased for children.

As regards the swine flue cases registered in Armenia, the Minister
pointed out that lab tests of two Armenian and one Iranian citizen have
proved positive. The Iranian citizen later left Armenia, but the two
Armenian citizens are still in hospital and will be discharged in two
or three days. Kushkyan pointed out that the patients’ tests have been
sent to London, but the final results will be available in a month.

Maestro Michel Legrand Concert At Boston Symphony Hall

MAESTRO MICHEL LEGRAND CONCERT AT BOSTON SYMPHONY HALL

AZG DAILY
11-11-2009

Culture

Legendary French-Armenian composer, virtuoso pianist and multiple
Oscar winner Michel Legrand will be playing a rare Boston engagement
at Symphony Hall in Boston (300 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston) on
Wednesday, November 18, at 8:00 pm. He will be joined by Quebec
recording star MARIO PELCHAT and special guest Dionne Warwick. They
will be accompanied by a quartet of brilliant musicians including
Catherine Michel (harp), a soloist with Opera de Paris. The concert
is a mixture of classical movie tunes by Maestro Legrand, as well as
jazz and Hollywood hits, built around the romance and nostalgia of
the French ‘chanson’.

Tickets available at are $45.00 – $75.00 For more
information visit:

www.bso.org
www.maestrartist.com.

Iraq Latest Crucible For Harvard Mediation: Negotiations Solve Triba

IRAQ LATEST CRUCIBLE FOR HARVARD MEDIATION: NEGOTIATIONS SOLVE TRIBAL DISPUTES
by James F Smith

Boston Globe
Nov 9 2009
MA

CAMBRIDGE – No longer locked in one big war, Iraq has become a land
of a hundred little wars. And this promised to be one more of them,
as two well-armed tribes clashed over a coveted swath of land.

One tribe brandished a promise to 2,000 acres from the current Iraqi
government. The other pointed to a like promise from the regime of
Saddam Hussein. Guns were raised, shots fired. There seemed no ground
for compromise, beyond the familiar local remedy: blood.

But then something extraordinary happened. The tribes agreed to
negotiate and, with the help of the local mayor and others, crafted
a deal giving both sides enough land to meet their needs.

"They began thinking of their relationship instead of thinking about
revenge upon each other," said Sa’ad Al-Khalidy, one of those who
arranged the intervention.

If it sounds like a chapter ripped right out of a dispute mediation
manual, well, it was. And the book was written in Cambridge.

The blood not spilled in central Iraq was another victory for the
mediation movement spawned by Harvard Law School guru Roger Fisher,
coauthor of the 1981 book "Getting to Yes." The Boston area has become
a global hub for teaching conflict resolution theory and practice
for uses in law, diplomacy, and business in farflung places.

The mediators in the Iraqi tribes’ dispute had all been recently
trained in methods developed by Fisher, whose landmark work in the
1960s and 1970s lives on in the many graduate school programs and
companies that he and his students have forged.

Dispute resolution programs now offer master’s and even doctoral
degrees at some campuses, among them the University of Massachusetts
at Boston, MIT, Tufts, and Brandeis. The Program on Negotiation at
Harvard Law School is a renowned source of expertise in the field.

Conflict management experts from the Boston area also helped tackle
vexing international stalemates, from Northern Ireland to South Africa,
Kosovo to China.

No wonder that when the State Department wanted to encourage Iraq
to move toward a culture of mediation and away from war, it turned
to Conflict Management Group, or CMG, the nonprofit consulting firm
launched by Fisher in Cambridge in 1984 that is now part of the
international development and relief group Mercy Corps.

A total of 73 municipal officials and tribal sheiks from across
Iraq underwent intensive training by CMG staffers in May and June in
mediation and negotiation skills. The effort, funded by a $2.5 million
State Department grant, grew out of a successful pilot program in
southern Iraq that trained 19 mediators.

Already, the newly trained mediators have helped local officials tackle
dozens of conflicts, mostly over scarce resources such as farmland, oil
income, electricity and water as well as numerous family disputes. The
goal is to build a national network of respected local negotiators.

Few countries have as much conflict to manage as Iraq. But Iraq has
little tradition of mediation, said Arthur Martirosyan, who lives in
Belmont and has run the Iraqi training program for CMG since 2006.

Traditionally, arbitration of disputes is left up to local sheiks,
whose decisions – picking one claim over another – often leave behind
festering anger.

Martirosyan came to Cambridge in 1991 to work with Fisher at CMG,
after getting a master’s degree from Yale. An ethnic Armenian born
in the former Soviet republic of Georgia, Martirosyan has used his
negotiation and language skills to mediate conflicts in Chechnya and
other regional hotspots as well as the Middle East.

Martirosyan returned to Iraq last month to train 24 more Iraqi
mediators, most of whom are tribal sheiks or municipal council
officials. He will also offer refresher courses to program graduates –
reflecting his conviction that good mediating skills take practice,
like playing the piano.

Khalidy, the coordinator for central and southern Iraq based in
Diwaniyah, said he has seen remarkable achievements by participants in
the pilot program, who went through five intensive rounds of classes.

Sixteen of them are full-time mediators, and have helped solve 32
disputes, ranging from an inheritance claim to a tense standoff
involving 50 abducted police officers, all of whom were released
safely.

"In many conflicts, they have been changed from enemies into partners
against the problem, not against each other," Khalidy said by phone
from Iraq.

Some successes are small. He described one mediation between two
families: one household with young girls built a privacy wall that
blocked sunlight from reaching the neighbor’s house. They had argued
for months, and were close to blows. A mediator helped them cool
down, and get away from their hardened positions. They came up with
a solution: The family that built the wall paid for a skylight for
the neighboring house.

The training uses methods that Fisher devised over decades of academic
study and popularized in "Getting to Yes," published in 1981. The
book has been translated into 18 languages – including a new edition
in Iraqi Arabic for this project.

Liza Baran, a Ukrainian who is Mercy Corps’ program manager for
the negotiation project in Iraq, said the sheiks appreciate the
step-by-step, common-sense approach that Fisher shaped. The bottom-line
goal is to help the parties identify their own interests, and the
other side’s interests – and then figure out ways to serve both sides.

"It’s kind of like getting the ABCs," Baran said. "Here is a whole
set of very systematized tools which you can apply, and it works."

Fisher, who is 88, lives in Cambridge and still goes to his Harvard Law
School office several days a week. Specialists in the field note that
some of his early ideas have been challenged and the field has evolved
dramatically in recent years, but no one doubts his seminal role.

Paul Cramer, a Harvard Law graduate who lives in Wellesley and is a
conflict management specialist for Accenture, the business consulting
firm, has traveled to Iraq with Martirosyan to conduct the training.

He said Iraqis had become used to having solutions imposed by a
dictatorship – and they quickly grasped Fisher’s premise that merely
defending entrenched positions was getting them nowhere.

He recalled one mediation by a sheik named Gazzi, who was called in
after a showdown between tribes over a murder. The usual solution would
be for the tribe to hand over the killer or go to battle. Gazzi helped
mediate one cooling-off period, and then another, giving the tribes
time to meet and express their longer-term interests. They finally
agreed to spare the young killer, lowering tensions in the whole
community and clearing the way to progress on their deeper conflicts.

Martirosyan said that building a network of Iraqi negotiators who can
then train others will extend the reach of the mediation far beyond
what foreigners could achieve trying to mediate cases themselves. He
said he is also talking to Iraqi universities, and several have said
they want to develop courses and exchanges with American institutions.

"I think negotiation is going to be an important skill set for Iraq,"
Martirosyan said. "People talk about the US exit strategy. I think
to a large degree it will depend how skilled the politicians are,
whether Kurds or Arabs . . . There are issues that will require a
lot of creative negotiation."

Unveiling of The Centennial Logo of The ARS

PRESS RELEASE

ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY OF WESTERN U.S.A., INC. REGIONAL EXECUTIVE
517 W. Glenoaks Blvd.
Glendale, CA 91202-2812
Contact: Rita Hintlian
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: (818) 500-1343
Fax: (818) 242-3732
Web Site:

A Century of Service
UNVEILING OF THE CENTENNIAL LOGO OF THE ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY

GLENDALE, California (November 6, 2009)- The Armenian Relief Society
(ARS) is turning 100 years old in 2010. To commemorate the ARS
Centenary, a Centennial logo has been created. This new logo will be
used in all 26 countries where the ARS has regions and chapters. The
ARS of Western U.S.A., Inc., Regional Executive Board will be the host
of the logo unveiling ceremony, under the auspices of the ARS Central
Executive Board.

The logo unveiling ceremony will be held on Thursday, November 12,
2009, at 6:30 pm, at the ARS of Western U.S.A., Regional Headquarters,
517 West Glenoaks Blvd., Glendale, CA 91202. This by invitation only
red carpet event will provide a preview to those events, which will be
hosted by other ARS entities on various continents.

`We are very pleased that our Region is hosting the ARS Centennial
logo unveiling ceremony. This is our chance to share our passion for
service locally and globally,’ said Sossie Poladian, Chair of the ARS
of Western U.S.A., Regional Executive Board. She added, `The essence
of service by the ARS has not changed. We continue to adapt to provide
compassionate culturally sensitive services.’

The ARS was founded in New York City in 1910, and the first ARS
chapters in the west were in Fresno and Los Angeles. The ARS of
Western U.S.A., Inc. became a separate entity from the East Coast and
Canada in 1984, with established headquarters in the City of Glendale.

The Western U.S.A. continues to make a difference locally and globally
to assist those in need. The Social Services offices and Child, Youth
& Family Guidance Center offer culturally sensitive services to help
guide those seeking help to resolve their personal issues, adapt to
their new environments and become more productive members of society.

Centennial celebrations planned for the year 2010 are a chance for ARS
members and supporters to come together as one big family, to
collectively remember those who came and passed leaving a legacy, and
to pull their strength together to embark on new paths for the next
century.

For more information about the Armenian Relief Society of Western
U.S.A., Inc., please check our web site at

www.arswestusa.org
www.arswestusa.org.

NATO Not To Side With Any Party

NATO NOT TO SIDE WITH ANY PARTY

news.am
Nov 6 2009
Armenia

NATO welcomes Armenia-Turkey reconciliation, NATO Special
Representative for the Caucasus and Central Asia Robert Simmons stated,
Nov. 6, 2009. According to him, the establishment of Armenia-Turkey
relations will be cost-effective for both states.

"Despite the closure of borders, the trade carries on, however
after the border opening the countries will be able to open up new
markets," Simmons outlined. Besides, the establishment of relations
will contribute to the stabilization of situation in such a complex
region as South Caucasus is, with numerous frozen conflicts like
Russia-Georgia and Karabakh. NATO cannot get involved with the
normalization process or side with any party, Simmons noted.

"Hopefully, Armenia-Turkey Protocols will be ratified, as they are
not interrelated with other issues. As for Karabakh dispute, it is
being settled within the framework of OSCE Minsk Group," Simmons said,
adding that Armenian and Azerbaijani Presidents should concentrate
on the expeditious resolution of Karabakh conflict.