Series examines genocide through Armenian experience

Billerica Minuteman, MA
May 12 2005
Series examines genocide through Armenian experience
By Margaret Smith/ Staff Writer
Thursday, May 12, 2005
For Armenians worldwide, April 24, 1915 is a date seared into their
collective consciousness as the darkest day in the history of their
3,000-year-old civilization.

The date marks what survivors and their descendants recall as
the beginning of arrests, mass-killings and deportations of
Armenians, including women and children, from their homes in Turkey –
then part of the Ottoman Empire. Survivors would tell of being
forcibly marched through harsh desert terrain to Syria.

In all, an estimated 1.5 million are reported to have died, many
>From hardships suffered on the trek.

By 1923, the Armenian population in Turkey fell from 2.5 million
to 100,000, according to some estimates.

This year marks the 90th anniversary of the killings. Although
the number of people who bore first-hand witness is rapidly
dwindling, the episode has gained more attention as historians and
scholars grapple with the ramifications of genocide.

An event series at the Patrick J. Mogan Cultural Center at 40
French St. in Lowell focuses on genocide – as well as the experiences
of the Armenian refugees who settled in the United States.

The events are a collaborative effort of several organizations,
including the Merrimack Valley Armenian Genocide Committee, the
Lowell National Historical Park, the University of Massachusetts at
Lowell and Project SAVE Armenian Photograph Archives, Inc.

For Levon Chorbajian, a Billerica resident since 1979, the
struggles of Armenians have personal meaning.

“I would like people to understand genocide is currently an
international problem and issue,” said Chorbajian, whose parents, the
late Walter and Antoinette Chorbajian, managed to escape the carnage
as children.

Chorbajian, a professor of sociology at UMass Lowell and one of
the event organizers, will moderate a forum on global issues of
genocide Thursday, May 19 at 7 p.m. at the Mogan Center.

The Mogan Center is also the host of an exhibit of artifacts,
works of art, photos and archives depicting the experiences of
Armenian victims, refugees and descendants. The exhibit is on display
until June 17.
“It’s taken the third and fourth generation to really activate the
interest,” said Ruth Thomasian, executive director of Project SAVE, a
Watertown-based organization dedicated to the preservation of
photographs and other artifacts depicting the experiences of Armenian
refugees. She added, “These people who experienced it – and their
children – just wanted to forget about it.”

Thomasian recalled speaking with a 98-year-old survivor now
living in New York. “A woman said, ‘For me, that is life, and for you
that is history.'”

Debate endures

The motivations for the killings remain the subject of
emotionally-charged debate. The Turkish government maintains these
actions were part of the country’s efforts to defend itself from
pro-Russian corroborators during World War I.

For years, many survivors refused to talk about the trauma they
had experienced or witnessed. Chorbajian said his parents, however,
was an exception. “My family talked about it very freely. It was a
frequent topic of conversation. I’m grateful I learned about this,”
Chorbajian said, adding that his family’s stories influenced his
career choice as a professor who researches, teaches and writes about
genocide issues.

The United Nations anti-genocide convention, first adopted in
1951, declared acts of genocide a crime whether committed in peace or
during times of war.

The definition of genocide includes acts committed with the
intention of destroying a national, ethnic, racial or religious
group; including killing members of a group, causing bodily or mental
harm to group members; deliberately inflicting conditions calculated
to bring about the group’s demise; imposing measures intended to
prevent births within the group and forcibly transferring children to
another group.

The Armenian genocide remains a painful point of contention
between Armenians and present-day Turks, even as it slips from living
memory, Chorbajian noted.
One of the events in the series, “The Other Side of Genocide,” a
lecture by series coordinator Mehmed Ali, executive director of the
Mogan Center, will focus on at issues that have faced the Turkish
community. The lecture takes place Tuesday, May 17 at 7 p.m. at the
center.

Chorbajian said one fear is that a public acknowledgement by the
Turkish government might lead to demands for reparation from
survivors or their descendants.

Chorbajian said he thinks an apology from Turkey would be more
important than compensation.

Whether to seek reparations, however, is something the Armenian
community must decide for itself, he said.

An ongoing tragedy

Chorbajian said it’s important to note that during episodes of
government-sanctioned mass-killings – including those in Turkey
-there are those who have given shelter or safe passage to would-be
victims. Many Turks, for example, warned or offered help their
Armenian neighbors even though doing so might have cost them their
own lives.

Similar responses during the Holocaust and the Rwandan civil war
were the subject of the acclaimed films, “Schindler’s List” and
“Hotel Rwanda.”

However, a troubling recurrence, he said, is the world
community’s inability to respond effectively. He cited the inaction
of United Nations officials in Rwanda as one example.

A complete schedule of commemorative events at the Mogan Center
and elsewhere can be found on the Web site of St. Vartanantz Armenian
Church of Chelmsford. For more information, visit the Web at
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.stsvartanantz.com.

OSCE media freedom rep proposes changes to new Turkish penal code

OSCE media freedom representative proposes changes to new Turkish penal code
AP Worldstream
May 11, 2005
WILLIAM J. KOLE

A trans-Atlantic media watchdog praised Turkish authorities Wednesday
for postponing the adoption of a new penal code and expressed hope
that nearly two dozen provisions he contends would undermine press
freedoms will be amended.
Miklos Haraszti, media freedom representative for the 55-nation
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, told Turkish
Justice Minister Cemil Cicek in a letter that Turkey’s decision to
hold off on enacting the changes was “both principled and practical.”
“I hope that all potential restrictions on the freedom of the press
will be fully removed at the end of the revision process,” Haraszti
said.
The Turkish parliament’s Justice Commission is expected to reconsider
the draft by June 1.
Haraszti sent Cicek a detailed review of the chapters of the draft
code which the Vienna-based OSCE’s media office contends could hinder
free discussion of public issues and pose a threat to press freedoms
in mostly Muslim Turkey, which is pushing for membership in the
European Union.
He outlined 23 provisions in three main areas: freedom of the media
and freedom of expression; access to and disclosure of information;
and the threat to free discussion of public affairs from defamation
and insult provisions.
“Your legislature now has the opportunity to contribute to the
creation of a penal code that is not only in conformity with
international media freedom commitments, but also serves as a model
for modern democracies,” Haraszti said.
EU officials recently have expressed concern that Turkish reform
efforts slowed after the bloc agreed in December to start membership
talks this October.
On March 31, Turkish lawmakers agreed to delay implementation of the
new penal code by two months following criticism from groups fearing
the legislation would threaten press freedoms.
Hoping to appease EU concerns and boost its chances of joining,
parliament hastily reformed Turkey’s 79-year-old penal code last
September to increase rights and freedoms. But press groups say other
changes threaten press freedoms and could result in tough prison terms
for journalists, and they have been lobbying to have the code changed.
Press groups say the legislation has vague language that could make it
easier to crack down on journalists, as well as containing provisions
that would make it more difficult to cover events such as legal
proceedings.
One article calls for prison sentences for those who disregard the
state’s “fundamental national interests.” The draft asserted that
calling for the withdrawal of Turkish soldiers from Cyprus or saying
that Armenians were subjected to genocide during World War I should be
considered an offense.
Criticizing state symbols also would remain a crime.
Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan, who has made EU membership a top
priority, is under increased pressure for what many say is his lack of
commitment to press freedoms.
He successfully sued a political cartoonist who lampooned him by
drawing him as a cat entangled in yarn and recently filed a lawsuit
against a satirical weekly that portrayed him as a variety of animals.
Journalists strongly criticized Erdogan earlier in March after he
accused the Turkish media of “tipping off” the EU about police
violence at a protest where women were beaten and kicked, after the
scenes were repeatedly shown on television.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Putin: Friendship b/w CIS peoples cannot be destroyed

PUTIN: FRIENDSHIP BETWEEN CIS PEOPLES CANNOT BE DESTROYED
RIA Novosti, Russia
May 08, 2005
MOSCOW, May 8 (RIA Novosti) – Friendship between the CIS peoples
cannot be torn up or destroyed, Russian President Vladimir Putin
said confidently.
According to him, relations with Commonwealth countries is “our
kith-and-kin boundless ties.” Putin gave high marks for the CIS summit
held on Sunday.
“I value highly today’s meeting of CIS heads of state and thank those
who took part in it for the constructive nature of the meeting,”
the Russian president said.
Putin pointed out that a spirit of unity exists between the
Commonwealth countries. “We are to solve all problems together,”
he concluded.
The informal CIS summit (it was not attended by the presidents
of Georgia and Azerbaijan: the former because Russia did not give
dates for the withdrawal of its military bases from Georgia, and the
latter because he did not want to sit at the same table with the
Armenian president, hero of Karabakh, whom Baku holds personally
responsible for numerous victims among civil population during
an armed conflict over Nagorny Karabakh) adopted a declaration on
humanitarian cooperation. The declaration says among other things
that CIS states will pay priority attention to cooperation in the
humanitarian area, including culture, national traditions, languages,
science, education, archives, information and mass communications,
sport and youth movement.
“The states, proceeding from their understanding of the importance of
the humanitarian ingredient in the development of integrative processes
on the post-Soviet space, will consider the possibility of concluding
an agreement on humanitarian cooperation between CIS states, which will
define appropriate mechanisms for joint efforts,” the document notes.
The states will make humanitarian cooperation within the CIS framework
more effective by drawing on the experience and principles of activity
of the corresponding international organizations, including UNESCO,
and will also examine the possibility of creating an interstate fund
of humanitarian cooperation.
The CIS states will encourage forums of creative intellectuals of
the Commonwealth countries and give them the required support.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: Turkish premier criticizes Belgian stance on Armenian genoci

Turkish premier criticizes Belgian stance on Armenian genocide doubters
Anatolia news agency
5 May 05
Ankara, 5 May: Turkish Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister
Abdullah Gul left for Kyrgyzstan on Thursday [5 May].
Speaking to reporters prior to his departure, Gul said: “Turkish Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Armenian President Robert Kocharyan
may have a meeting (in Moscow or Warsaw), but at the moment there is
no any scheduled meeting.” [Passage omitted]
Gul said that there had been attempts in some European countries
considering opposition against the so-called Armenian genocide a crime.
“A dangerous development has occurred in Belgium recently. I held
talks with Belgian Foreign Minister Karel de Gucht and told him that
such an attempt contradicts basic principles of Europe. They are
trying to prevent people from explaining their ideas and showing
historical facts.”
Belgian parliament has approved a motion and submitted it to the
Senate. The motion envisages an imprisonment from eight days up to
a year and a fine of 26 up to 5,000 euros for a person who rejects
so-called Armenian genocide. [Passage omitted]
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Abu Dhabi: FM official receive Turkmenistan Ambassador,Armenian offi

FM official receive Turkmenistan Ambassador, Armenian official
Emirates News Agency
May 3, 2005 Tuesday 1:17 PM EST
Abu Dhabi, May 03 — Foreign Ministry’s Assistant Under Secretary for
Specialisation Affairs, Ahmed Abdul Rahman Al Jarman, received here
today at his office Ambassador of Turkmenistan, Gurbannazar Nazarov..
During the meeting, they discussed cooperation and exchange of visit
between officials from the two countries..
The Ministry’s Director of Consular Affairs, Ali Mohammed Al Zar’ouni,
also received at his office today the Director of the Department of
Consular Affairs at the Armenian Foreign Ministry, Tigran Sabrania..
During the meeting, which was held in the presence of the Armenian
Ambassador, Arshak Boladian, they discussed various issues of
cooperation between the two countries, including consular issues..
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Live Review: System of a Down in San Francisco

LiveDaily.com
April 26 2005
Live Review: System of a Down in San Francisco

by Rob Evans
liveDaily Editor

Published: April 26, 2005 01:29 PM
Unlikely rock success story System of a Down launched a brief
guerilla tour Monday (4/25) in San Francisco to hype their highly
anticipated “Mezmerize/Hypnotize” album project, playing a frenzied
90-minute club set that touched on material from throughout the
group’s seven-year career.
The show at The Fillmore opened with the new single “B.Y.O.B.,” and
its chorus, “Everybody’s coming to the party/Have a real good time,”
seemed to be taken literally by the crowd. But like most SOAD songs,
the hook is the sugar that delivers tough medicine–in this case an
anti-war message: “Why don’t presidents fight the war?/Why do they
always send the poor?”
SOAD has become masterful at this slight of hand, getting their
highly political messages across by mixing breakneck, hardcore beats,
slowing down into a brief melody, and cranking right back up again.
In concert, it’s evident that the spot-on rhythm section of Shavo
Odajian and John Dolmayan is the engine that makes this formula go.
It’s also clear that the fans are listening to the lyrics, because,
at times, the crowd’s sing-alongs top the volume of the music coming
from the stage.
When the band launched into its best-known song, “Chop Suey,” the
crowd jumped up and down in unison, testing the structural stability
of this historic club’s hardwood floors. And, for much of the night,
a good 25 percent of the floor was claimed by slam-dancers in the
pit.
System of a Down’s Serj Tankian isn’t your typical frontman. He’s got
the requisite lanky physique, but his slightly awkward movements on
stage, along with his mop of curly hair, evoke ’80s-era Howard Stern
more than Robert Plant. Nonetheless, he’s the perfect voice for this
group, able to deliver a death-metal chant before switching into
theatrical vocal sections that conjure Freddie Mercury.
Though his bandmates are all business on stage, guitarist and
principal songwriter Daron Malakian–in between his scattershot
licks–is the SOAD member most likely to smile, and to interact with
the crowd.
“We’re here to kill rock and roll,” Malakian said at one point during
the set. But the truth is, this group of Armenians from Los Angeles
is one of a handful of popular rock acts with the stuff to save it.
Their upcoming “Mezmerize” album is due May 17; its companion set
“Hypnotize” will hit stores sometime in the fall.
Sure, they’re prone to a few Spinal Tap-ish excesses–some of their
pseudo-Middle Eastern vocal exercises border on the ridiculous, and a
few extended instrumental sections come across as Bollywood
soundtrack fodder–but rock and roll is all about excess, as proven
over and over again by System forefathers like Queen and Led
Zeppelin. Not being afraid to sometimes look silly is half the
battle.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenian leader, officials commemorate 1915 massacre victims

Armenian leader, officials commemorate 1915 massacre victims
Arminfo
24 Apr 05
YEREVAN
The Armenian president has visited the Tsitsernakaberd memorial to the
victims of the 1915 Armenian genocide in Ottoman Turkey.
The president was accompanied by Prime Minister Andranik Markaryan,
members of government, Catholicos of all Armenians Garegin II, the
speaker of parliament, Artur Bagdasaryan, and prominent
representatives of the diaspora. They laid wreaths at the eternal
fire. The catholicos held a commemorative mass at the eternal fire.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Diese “Ereignisse” im Osten

taz, die tageszeitung
23. April 2005
Diese “Ereignisse” im Osten
von EBERHARD SEIDEL
Am 24. April 1915 ließ die jungtürkische Regierung des Osmanischen
Reiches die gesamte armenische Elite in Istanbul verhaften. Mehr als
600 Intellektuelle wurden nach Anatolien deportiert, die meisten in
der Folge ermordet. Der 24. April gilt als der Beginn der
systematischen und planmäßig durchgeführten Vertreibung und
Vernichtung der Armenier, die damals auf dem Gebiet der heutigen
Türkei gelebt haben.
ie Ermordung von rund 800.000 der knapp zwei Millionen in der Türkei
lebenden Armenier wird von vielen als der erste Völkermord des an
Genoziden so reichen 20. Jahrhunderts gesehen. Von vielen, aber nicht
von allen. Denn im Gegensatz zum Völkermord an den europäischen
Juden, der für die Völkergemeinschaft eine feststehende Tatsache ist,
gilt dies für die Massenmorde in den Jahren 1915 bis 1917 nicht. Er
ist bis heute nicht in das Weltbewusstsein eingedrungen. Während der
Nachfolgestaat des NS-Regimes den Holocaust zugegeben und die
Verantwortung für die Folgen übernommen hat, bestreitet die türkische
Republik, die Rechtsnachfolgerin des Osmanischen Reiches, bis heute
jegliche Schuld.
Die “Ereignisse” im Osten des Osmanischen Reiches seien unvermeidbare
Begleiterscheinungen militärischer Aktionen gegen armenische
Separatisten im Verlauf des Ersten Weltkriegs gewesen, lautet die
offizielle türkische Sprachregelung.
Auch in Deutschland ist der Völkermord an den Armeniern ein
Randthema. Das ist verwunderlich, denn kein westliches Land war so in
das Geschehen verwickelt wie das deutsche Kaiserreich, das in den
Jahren 1914 bis 1918 der wichtigste Verbündete der jungtürkischen
Regierung war. Deutschland war es auch, das den beiden
Hauptverantwortlichen des Genozids, Talaat Pascha und Enver Pascha,
zur Flucht verhalf – sie konnten sich so der Verantwortung vor dem
Istanbuler Kriegsgerichtshof entziehen.
Verwiesen sei an dieser Stelle auf das kürzlich von Wolfgang Gust
herausgegebene Buch “Der Völkermord an den Armeniern 1915/1916.
Dokumente aus dem Politischen Archiv des Auswärtigen Amtes” (zu
Klampen Verlag). Darin sind Akten dokumentiert, die die
Mitwisserschaft und in einigen Fällen auch die Mittäterschaft
deutscher Militärberater an den Deportationen der Armenier belegen.
Das Hamburger Institut für Sozialforschung hat die inzwischen zum
Standardwerk avancierte Studie “Armenien und der Völkermord. Die
Istanbuler Prozesse und die türkische Nationalbewegung”
dankenswerterweise neu aufgelegt. Der Autor Taner Akcam analysiert
darin die türkische Haltung zum Völkermord anhand türkischer Quellen.
Einen besonderen Stellenwert räumt Akcam dabei den Protokollen der
Kriegsgerichtsprozesse ein, die in Istanbul zwischen 1919 und 1921
gegen die Verantwortlichen des Genozids stattgefunden haben.
Die Istanbuler Prozesse waren der historisch erste Versuch,
Menschenrechtsprinzipien mit Hilfe einer internationalen
Strafgerichtsbarkeit durchzusetzen. Dieser fehlgeschlagene Vorläufer
der Nürnberger Prozesse wurde vor allem auf Druck der alliierten
Siegermächte USA, England und Frankreich durchgeführt. 17
Todesurteile wurden verhängt, von denen drei vollstreckt wurden. Nach
Auffassung des Kriegsgerichtshofes gab es keinen Zweifel, dass es
sich bei den Vertreibungen 1915 bis 1917 um einen geplanten
Massenmord gehandelt hat.
Dieser Auffassung hat sich auch der spätere Gründer der türkischen
Republik, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, zunächst angeschlossen – eine
moralische oder gar rechtspolitische Bedeutung hat er dem allerdings
nicht beigemessen. Von Atatürk ist folgende Einschätzung überliefert:
“Die Ermordung von Menschen und ähnliche Verbrechen kommen in
Amerika, Frankreich und England ebenso vor, doch nur die Türkei wird
für das Massaker an 800.000 ihrer Staatsbürger zur Rechenschaft
gezogen.”
Ab 1920 verloren die Istanbuler Prozesse selbst bei den Gegnern der
Jungtürken den anfänglich durchaus vorhandenen Rückhalt. Denn mit dem
Vertrag von Sèvre (August 1920) nahmen die Alliierten dem Osmanische
Reich faktisch die nationale Souveränität. Sie stellten das Land
unter ihre Militär- und Finanzkontrolle, erzwangen große
Gebietsabtretungen in Europa und in Ostanatolien. Und die Griechen
versuchten große Teile Westanatoliens zu besetzen.
ür Atatürk, der sich an die Spitze der Widerstandsbewegung stellte,
hatte die nationale Souveränität jetzt Vorrang vor einer Aufarbeitung
des Verbrechens. Er drohte 1920/1921, sämtliche in seiner Hand
befindlichen englischen Gefangenen hinzurichten, falls der unter der
Kontrolle der Alliierten stehende Kriegsgerichtshof in Istanbul
weitere Todesurteile vollstrecken sollte. Während der folgenden
Befreiungskriege kämpfte eine Reihe von Verantwortlichen des
Völkermordes an seiner Seite, später übernahmen sie hochrangige
politische Ämter in der neu gegründeten Republik.
Taner Akcams Buch ist ein Aufruf an die armenische, vor allem an die
türkische Seite, endlich die Dokumente zur Kenntnis zu nehmen. Sein
eigener Ansatz, der in der Türkei seit Jahren zumindest in
zivilgesellschaftlichen Kreisen zustimmend debattiert wird und mit zu
einer veränderten Sicht beiträgt, ist ein hoffnungsvoller Beginn. Er
unterwirft den Türkismus und die Pläne zur (muslimischen)
Homogenisierung des christlich-muslimischen Anatoliens ebenso einer
kritischen Bewertung wie die Autonomiebestrebungen eines kleinen
Teils der Armenier während des Zerfallsprozesses des Osmanischen
Reiches.
Wo Akcam sich um eine betont sachliche Darstellung bemüht, stellt der
Journalist und Politikwissenschaftler Rolf Hosfeld das Leid der Opfer
in den Vordergrund. “Operation Nemesis. Die Türkei, Deutschland und
der Völkermord an den Armeniern” ist eine glänzend geschriebene
Abhandlung. Eingehend untersucht Hosfeld die Entstehung des
türkischen Nationalismus als Wurzel des Völkermords an den Armeniern.
Auf vielen Seiten, gestützt auf Niederschriften von Zeitzeugen,
schildert er minutiös, auf welche Weise die Menschen getötet wurden.
Er benennt die Täter – Regierung, Verwaltungsbeamte, Militär,
paramilitärische Gruppen, kurdische und tscherkessische Banden, aber
auch ganz normale Bürger – und die Profiteure.
Der Völkermord war, so Hosfeld, eine gigantische Enteignung und
Umverteilung von Reichtum – weg von den christlichen Minderheiten der
Griechen und Armenier, die zu diesem Zeitpunkt mehr als 25 Prozent
der Bevölkerung stellte, hin zur muslimischen Majorität auf dem
Gebiet der heutigen Türkei. Vor dem Völkermord befanden sich 66
Prozent des Binnenhandels, 79 Prozent der Industrie- und
Handwerksunternehmen und 66 Prozent der akademischen Berufe in den
Händen der christlichen Minderheiten. Danach spielten sie keine Rolle
mehr. Diese Umverteilung setzte die Mittel für eine “ursprüngliche
Akkumulation” einer entstehenden türkischen Bourgeoisie frei.
ewichtige Teile der Funktionseliten und des Bürgertums der jungen
türkischen Republik sind mit dem Genozid verknüpft. Das erklärt die
Staatsdoktrin in dieser Frage seit 1923, entschuldigt allerdings
nichts. Immerhin, so Hosfeld, steht der Paragraf 305 des
Strafgesetzbuches, nach dem die Anerkennung des Völkermords an den
Armeniern als staatsfeindliche Propaganda geahndet werden kann,
inzwischen zur Diskussion. Auch fordern Wissenschaftler und
Journalisten wie der Chefredakteur des Massenblattes Hürriyet ein
Ende der Leugnungspolitik.
Wie die weitere Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema in der Türkei
aussehen wird, bleibt abzuwarten. Zumindest für die aktuelle Debatte
in Deutschland ist Rolf Hosfelds Abhandlung ein wichtiger Beitrag.
Denn er macht auch deutlich, dass Deutschland bei der noch
ausstehenden Versöhnung zwischen Türken und Armeniern nicht abseits
stehen kann. Es muss sich noch eingehender Rechenschaft über seine
Mitverantwortung am Genozid ablegen.
Taner Akcam: “Armenien und der Völkermord. Die Istanbuler Prozesse
und die türkische Nationalbewegung”. Hamburger Edition, Hamburg 2004,
430 Seiten, 16 Euro
Rolf Hosfeld: “Operation Nemesis. Die Türkei, Deutschland und der
Völkermord an den Armeniern”. Verlag Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Köln 2005,
351 Seiten, 19,90 Euro
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: Turkey causes disappointment in Europe: Lagendijk

Turkey causes disappointment in Europe: Lagendijk
NTV MSNBC, Turkey
Lagendijk said that government’s suggestion of setting up committee to study
the so-called Armenian genocide was positive.
April 5- The breaking up of a Women’s Day rally by Turkish police and the
call by a governor to confiscate the books of well known Turkish writer
Orhan Pamuk had been caused great disappointment in Europe, a senior EU
official said Tuesday.
Speaking to private television station NTV, Joost Lagendijk, the head
of the EU-Turkey Mixed Parliamentary Commission, said that the government’s
not having put forward a concrete reaction to these issues could not be
explained within EU, he said
The order by the governor of Isparta’s Sütçuler to confiscate Orhan
Pamuk’s books due to his having made a statement on the Armenian issue has
created a completely different perception about Turkey, Lagendijk said.
These are very sad events, he said, adding that these incidents are
more important than passing new laws.
Lagendijk criticised the government attitude to the incidents, saying
that either the Prime Minister or the Foreign Minister could have a
statement.
“(They could have said) Ok we do not agree with the views of Orhan
Pamuk but he is free to give his own views,” Lagendijk told NTV.
On the issue of Ankara signing the expansion of the customs union for
new members of the bloc, Lagendijk said that although this would not mean
Turkey politically recognises Greek Cypriot side it would mean giving green
light to recognition.
–Boundary_(ID_9CReqUoOZdSeq8amP8KAcg)–
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Antelias: Pope John Paul II: outstanding figure in modern Christendo

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:
PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon
Armenian version:
POPE JOHN PAUL II: OUTSTANDING FIGURE IN MODERN CHRISTENDOM, ONE OF
THE MOST COURAGEOUS SPIRITUAL LEADERS OF OUR TIME
His Holiness Aram I made the following statement expressing his
profound sadness following the announcement by the Holy See of the
death of His Holiness Pope John Paul II:
“His Holiness Pope John Paul II will remain an outstanding figure
in the modern history of world Christendom. In fact, his relentless
effort to make the Gospel of Christ a living reality in the life of
people, his unyielding prophetic witness to make the moral values
the guiding principles of human societies, his firm commitment to the
cause of Christian unity, his openness to other religions with a clear
vision of living together as a reconciled community in the midst of
diversities, and his continuous advocacy for justice, human rights
and freedom made him an exceptional figure of great achievements. As
moderator of the World Council of Churches central committee and as
the Armenian Catholicos of Cilicia, I had the privilege to meet His
Holiness on different occasions and witnessed the strength of his
faith, the depth of his wisdom and the clarity of his vision.”
##
The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates
of the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about
the history and the mission of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may
refer to the web page of the Catholicosate,
The Cilician Catholicosate, the administrative center of the church
is located in Antelias, Lebanon.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress