Breaks In Mobile Communication Provided By Armentel Company Triggere

BREAKS IN MOBILE COMMUNICATION PROVIDED BY ARMENTEL COMPANY TRIGGERED BY SYSTEM MIGRATION

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
Dec 4 2007

YEREVAN, December 4. /ARKA/. Breaks in mobile communication provided by
ArmenTel Telecommunication Company are triggered by system migration.

The company’s press office told ARKA News Agency that some subscribers
have their mobile telecommunication cut off because of migration
(transition from one system to another).

To check whether they have communication or not, subscribers have to
switch off and then switch on their telephone sets.

ArmenTel apologizes to its subscribers for inconveniences.

Russian Vympelcom (Bee Line trademark) became ArmenTel’s 100-percent
shareholder in April 2007.

ArmenTel has 608.500 subscribers for stationary telecommunication
and 452,000 mobile communication subscribers.

Karine Minasyan: Searching for missing a problem, needs financing

Karine Minasyan: Searching of the missing is a problem which should be
taken to heart so that to decide to finance it

2007-12-01 00:37:00

ArmInfo. Searching of the missing is a problem which should be taken to
heart so that to decide to finance it, Armenian coordinator of the IWG
on searching of the missing and refugees and release of the war
prisoners at the Karabakh conflict zone Karine Minasyan told ArmInfo
correspondent.

, – the coordinator said. She also added that ICRC is implementing
certain work in this direction. Though it seemsstrange, but the IWG
accumulated such a big experience in this sphere that it can do even
more than the ICRC. ‘The ICRC has got more finance and material
potential. Though our principles coincide, it is first of all
confidentiality, impartiality and neutrality, nevertheless we are more
flexible, mobile and we have more potential in this sense’. Difference
in the approaches of getting the
information may be also added to this. Relatives of the missing should
apply to the ICRC to get information. As for the IWG, it will start
searching only if a man which has got information allied to it.

A Conflict-Laden Administration Searching Out Trouble

A CONFLICT-LADEN ADMINISTRATION SEARCHING OUT TROUBLE
By Jonathan Schwartz, Columnist

Binghamton University Pipe Dream, USA
Oct 30 2007

I was bored the other day, daydreaming about more ways that our
government could create some new enemies, when a brilliant idea came
to me. Why don’t we dig up some of the most unpleasant memories in
the modern history of our most important Middle Eastern ally, Turkey,
and drag their nearly century-old wrongdoings back through the mud at
one of the most critical junctures in U.S. foreign policy history,
ignoring the threats of permanently strained relations from their
generals in the process? Well, they must be reading my thoughts down
there in Washington, D.C., because sure enough, Congress went and
stole my idea.

When I first read of this news, I was furious, not because anyone
actually likes us very much in the Middle East these days short of
our good friends, the Saudis. But for a while there, Turkey was at
least willing to be drawn on the same map as us.

Continued instability in the northern region of Iraq in the post-Saddam
era has drawn the ire of the Turkish government who is now voicing
its dissatisfaction with the United States’ lenient approach to the
Kurdish rebels in northern Iraq. Recently, attacks from a particular
Kurdish rebel group based in northern Iraq, the PKK, on Turkish
soldiers have led to talk of a Turkish military incursion into
Northern Iraq citing Americas inability to guarantee them security,
something that Washington would rather not have to deal with.

But despite all that, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi felt that we
hadn’t quite irked the Turks as much as we possibly could.

She thought that now would be the most opportune time to come out and
say to the people of Turkey, "By the way, right now, 90 years later,
you are going to take responsibility for the actions of a regime
most of you were never alive to even remember. This concludes the
reaffirmation of our moral superiority, just in case you thought our
two countries were on an even playing field."

There exists resounding and irrefutable evidence supporting the
conclusion that a mass-genocide was perpetrated on the Armenian
population by the Turkish regime between 1915 to 1917. There’s even
a Wikipedia article aptly named "The Armenian Genocide." No one in
tune with the actual facts of history denies these horrific events
occurred. Certainly, I’m in no way insinuating that this didn’t happen.

What I am insinuating is that a non-binding resolution from the United
States Congress on this matter is not a wise foreign policy decision
at this time.

Turkey’s assistance on both the military and intelligence fronts of the
war in Iraq are vital to any sort of winning campaign that may still
yet ensue. Turkey’s supportive voice on the world stage is vital in
the fight being waged on America’s image in the media. And the fact
that we feel the need to blame an entire population for a regime that
many of their grandparents died to overthrow despite these obvious
consequences serves as an example of poor politics.

I wonder who made America the voice of the world that gets to say,
"What you did was wrong, we condemn it, you should be ashamed;
anytime you’d like to apologize, we’ll be here." That’s basically
all a non-binding resolution does. No action is taken, no sanctions,
no anything. Simply, it is legislation being passed in this case for
the sake of wagging our finger at someone else.

That we feel as though we in America are in a position to be the
judges, or worse, the writers of history, might explain why everyone
outside the States is so angry. Until we decide to step off our high
and mighty, our image throughout the world will continue to suffer.

Unfortunately, with the current set of elected officials on both
sides of the political spectrum, this seems very unlikely.

/display_article.php?id=5997

http://www.bupipedream.com/pipeline_web

Turkish Ambassador Will Warn U.S. Administration

TURKISH AMBASSADOR WILL WARN U.S. ADMINISTRATION OF "ANKARA’S INDIGNATION" ABOUT GENOCIDE RESOLUTION

PanARMENIAN.Net
22.10.2007 15:45 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Turkish Ambassador to the United States, Nabi Sensoy
returned to Washington yesterday after consultations that followed
adoption of the Armenian Genocide resolution by the U.S. House Foreign
Affairs Committee.

Ambassador Sensoy said he will warn U.S. administration of "Ankara’s
indignation" about the Genocide resolution, the Turkish Daily News
reports.

Gates Expresses Concerns About Armenian Resolution, Turkish Action

CQ Federal Department and Agency Documents
REGULATORY INTELLIGENCE DATA
October 18, 2007 Thursday

GATES EXPRESSES CONCERNS ABOUT ARMENIAN RESOLUTION, TURKISH ACTION

WASHINGTON, Oct. 18, 2007 – Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates told
reporters today he’s concerned the pending congressional resolution
regarding Armenian genocide "has the potential to do real harm to our
troops in Iraq." He also called on Turkey to refrain from military
action into Iraq, which he said "would create an international crisis
and further undermine stability in Iraq."

Speaking at his first news conference with new Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff Navy Adm. Michael G. Mullen, Gates expressed concerns
about a congressional resolution that declares Ottoman Turks’
1915-1917 killings of Armenians a genocide.

President Bush reiterated his own concern over the measure during a
news conference yesterday. He called on Congress not to vote on the
resolution, which has heightened tensions between the United States
and Turkey.

"It has the potential to do real harm to our troops in Iraq and would
strain, perhaps beyond repair, our relationship with a key ally in a
vital region in the wider war on terror," Gates said today.

Gates said neither he nor Armenian Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan
raised the issue during their meeting this morning at the Pentagon.

He told reporters that the measure, if passed, could drive a serious
wedge between the United States and Turkey that hampers U.S. efforts
in Iraq. He recalled Turkey’s reaction when the French parliament
passed a similar resolution in 2006; Turkey responded by cutting off
military-to-military relationships.

The U.S. war effort could suffer greatly if Turkey reacted similarly
to a U.S. measure, Gates said. "I don’t think the Turks are bluffing.
I think it is that meaningful to them. I think they see implications
in terms of reparations and perhaps even borders," he said.

Gates said he believes there’s "a very real risk" of Turkey putting
restrictions on use of Incirlik Air Base in the southeastern part of
the country if the resolution passes. He noted that 70 percent of
U.S. air cargo, one-third of its fuel and 95 percent of
mine-resistant, ambush- protected vehicles bound for Iraq transit
through Incirlik. "So there are real consequences here, and I think
people are beginning to think about that," he said.

The secretary said the issue boils down, not so much to the substance
of the issue, but to timing and consequences.

Meanwhile, the United States and other countries are negotiating with
Turkey to urge its leaders not to send troops across the border into
Iraq to confront terrorists launching attacks into Turkey.

The Turkish parliament voted yesterday to approve military action.
The one- year authorization gives the green light for Turkey’s
military to move into the Kurdish region of Iraq to go after members
of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, or PKK, who have been launching
attacks into Turkey.

Gates urged Turkey to exercise restraint, citing the instability the
action would create in Iraq and the region. "We recognize the harm
and heartbreak caused by terrorist attacks across the Iraqi border
into Turkey and are working with both governments to rein in the
activities of the PKK," he said. "We recognize that Turks are being
killed by this organization — innocent Turks, both soldiers and
civilians."

The United States wants to help the Turks deal with the PKK, he said,
and will pass specific intelligence it gets about the group to the
Turks. "I think that if we were to come up with specific information,
that we and the Iraqis would be prepared to do the appropriate
thing," he said.

Gates said he plans to discuss the matter when he meets with Turkish
National Defense Minister Mehmet Vecdi Gonul in Europe. "We are
determined to work with the Turks in trying to reduce this threat to
the Turkish people and the Turkish army," he said.

Mullen said he’s encouraged to see Turkish and Iraqi government
leaders addressing the problem. "Hopefully there can be some positive
outcome from that engagement," he said.

ANKARA: Sanctions Against US Won’t Affect Congressmen, Expert Warns

SANCTIONS AGAINST US WON’T AFFECT CONGRESSMEN, EXPERT WARNS
Serkan DemÝrtaÞ

Turkish Daily News, Turkey
Oct 9 2007

Egemen Baðýþ’s statements that Turkey can cut its logistic support
for American troops stationed in Iraq are not considered very
productive. ‘I do not think that it will have an impact on the
congressmen’s decision’ Faruk Loðoðlu says

Ahead of a crucial vote in the United States Congress, Turkey’s
threats on cutting logistic support and strategic cooperation with
the U.S. if the genocide bill is approved, will have no affect on
members of the Congress, experts warn.

"The sanctions related with Iraq can create a sort of excitement
among the Congressmen but I do not think that it will have an impact
on them," said retired Ambassador, Faruk Loðoðlu, now head of the
Ankara-based Eurasia Strategic Studies center (ASAM), whose last
posting was to Washington D.C. Congress’ Foreign Affairs Committee is
expected to approve Wednesday a bill which characterizes the incidents
in 1915-1916 in eastern Anatolia as genocide and Speaker Nancy Pelosi,
a known supporter of the Armenian cause, could then decide to bring
it to the House floor for a vote. Many believe that it is very likely
that the bill will be approved if put to a vote in the House.

Turkey has been trying hard to stop the process in Congress, through
an intense diplomatic campaign aimed at the U.S. Administration and
Israel. The messages sent to U.S. officials were that the two long-time
allies’ relations could be seriously hurt if the bill is approved.

Cutting off support?

"For example, the Americans depend on Turkey for a large part of their
logistic support in Iraq. We would be obliged to cut this support,"
Egemen Baðýþ, deputy leader of the Justice and Development Party
(AKP) who left for Washington D.C. yesterday to lobby the congressmen,
was quoted by daily Hurriyet.

But Baðýþ softened his words at a press conference he held before his
departure. "Turkey has a lot of options but it is not my responsibility
to evaluate which of them could be used. The daily Hurriyet has
exaggerated the scenarios. But we will be doing everything to stop
the approval of the bill," he said.

Among the mentioned sanctions are closing the Ýncirlik base,
in Turkey’s south to the American military to supply its troops
in Iraq and Afghanistan, not allowing the withdrawal of American
troops through Turkish territory, and suspending some of the military
equipment purchases.

Government has to decide

But according to Loðoðlu, threatening the members of Congress with
such sanctions is not likely to work. "In general, I may say that
such threats won’t have any influence on the congressmen’s decision,"
he said.

"What is important here is the government’s will and its purpose.

Is it going to be good or bad? I always think that before applying
such sanctions, they have to be analyzed on scales: Who will be most
hurt by the sanctions? Us or them? They have to be applied if it is
going to be the other party who will be hurt most," he added.

Loðoðlu underlined that the U.S. has many allies in the region and
can use their bases in some other countries. The U.S. has established
military bases in Bulgaria and Romania after Turkey’s rejection of
a U.S. request to use Turkish bases and territory.

"Instead we should inform the congressmen about the U.N.’s Convention
on Genocide and Turkey’s proposal to Armenia for establishing a
joint commission of historians to analyze the incidents. We may not
convince many of them but we can shake their position a little bit,"
the retired ambassador said.

The recognition of the Armenian genocide in the parliaments of third
countries is one of the most serious problems Turkey is faced with in
the international arena. A dozen or so countries, including Turkey’s
allies in NATO, have recognized the events in 1915-1916 as genocide.

–Boundary_(ID_QYfQV4hC1p6kTALVJ0eB2w)- –

BAKU: British MP Believes He won’t be Permitted to Visit Azerbaijan

TREND

21.09.2007 18:41:54

British Parliamentarian Believes He Will not be
Permitted to Visit Azerbaijan

Great Britain, London /corr. Trend G.Ahmadova,
A.Gasimova / The member of the Chamber of Community of
the British Parliament, Steven Pound, said that he
would like to visit Baku after his scandalous visit to
the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic which is
in reality the occupied territory of Azerbaijan.

`I would like to visit Azerbaijan, but due to my visit
to Karabakh, I can not do this,’ Pound mentioned in a
response to the protest letter of the representatives
of the Azerbaijani diaspora in London.

Pound and several of his colleagues visited Karabakh
at the end of last month. After his visit Pound said
publicly that Karabakh has been Armenian land for
millenniums, causing the Azerbaijani diaspora in
London to protest.

A member of the Azerbaijani diaspora in London
reported to Trend that after the protest letter, Pound
mitigated his position and promised to deeply study
the issue and expressed his consent to fight for
objectivity.

Commenting on Pound’s statement, the Press Secretary
of the Foreign Ministry of Azerbaijan, Khazar Ibrahim,
did not exclude the possibility of permitting the
British parliamentarian to visit Azerbaijan.

`He illegally visited Azerbaijani territories. In
addition, if he has positive intentions and wants to
recognize his error, the issue of permitting him to
visit Azerbaijan may be considered,’ Khazar Ibrahim
said.

The British parliamentarian said that his visit to
Karabakh in September was aimed at only becoming
familiarized with the realities there. In Karabakh he
was received by the so-called Speaker of the
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic’s Parliament, Ashot Gulian.

The protest letter sent to Pound, after his statement
that Karabakh is Armenian territory, provided
historical facts testifying that Karabakh belongs to
Azerbaijan, proof of ethnical cleansing of
Azerbaijanis in Karabakh, Khojali, and other
Azerbaijani regions.

The conflict between the two countries of the South
Caucasus began in 1988 due to territorial claims by
Armenia against Azerbaijan. Since 1992 Armenia has
occupied 20% of Azerbaijani land including the
Nagorno-Karabakh region and its seven surrounding
districts. In 1994, Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a
ceasefire agreement at which time the active
hostilities ended. The co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk
Group ( Russia, France, and the US) are currently
holding peaceful negotiations.

NKR Elections Can Serve As Example For Many States

NKR ELECTIONS CAN SERVE AS EXAMPLE FOR MANY STATES

PanARMENIAN.Net
10.07.2007 15:47 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "European structures do know that elections in NKR
are held more transparently than in other states of the region. This
deprived them of the possibility to influence on Karabakh,"
political scientist Levon Melik Shahnazaryan told a news conference
in Yerevan. The recurrent presidential election in NKR is another
move towards independence of Nagorno Karabakh, according to him.

"Change of President in Karabakh is exercised according to the
Constitution which was adopted via a national referendum. I should
say that the NKR population is very politicized and it makes a choice
proceeding from the security interests. In this view, elections can
serve as example for many states," he said

Antelias: CathCil in Conf. on "Islamic World, Victim Of Terrorism"

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

Armenian version:

THE CATHOLICOSATE OF CILICIA PARTICIPATES IN THE CONFERENCE ON
"ISLAMIC WORLD, A VICTIM OF TERRORISM"

The first international conference on the "culture of resistance" was
recently held under the name of "Islamic World, a Victim of Terrorism" in
Tehran. The conference was organized by World Forum for Proximity of Islamic
Schools of Thought and presided by Ayatollah Mohammad-Ali Taskhiri. The
conference, held on May 1 at the International Center of Conferences of
Islamic Countries, included a speech by the President of the Islamic
Republic of Iran, Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

An invitation to attend the conference was also sent to His Holiness Aram
I, who delegated Archbishop Sebouh Sarkissian, Primate of the Diocese of
Tehran, to participate in the event on behalf of both the Catholicosate of
Cilicia and the Diocese. Speaking in Arabic, Archbishop Sebouh greeted the
President of the Republic and the conference attendants on behalf of His
Holiness Aram I. He then delivered a lecture in English on "Terrorism and
Christianity."

The Archbishop highlighted that the whole world has become a victim of
terrorism and highlighted the role of religions in producing a culture of
peace and coexistence through joint efforts and dialogue.

"Degrading any religion or a religious belief is terrorism. Crimes are
committed in the name of religion and human rights but in reality they have
nothing to do with religion, because religion seeks to guide people towards
happiness, love, peace and mutual respect," he said.

The conference attendants included lecturers and officials from several
Arab, African and European countries, as well the United States, Canada and
Australia.

http://www.cathcil.org/
http://www.cathcil.org/v04/doc/Armenian.htm

Nalbandian Celebrates First Victory In The Australian Open

NALBANDIAN CELEBRATES FIRST VICTORY IN THE AUSTRALIAN OPEN

ArmRadio.am
16.01.2007 12:16

Only in an additional set Argentinean Armenian tennis player David
Nalbandian defeated Yanko Tipsarevich of Serbia in the first round
of the Australian Open held in Melbourne. David Nalbandian lost in
the first two sets 6:7 and 4:6, but managed to celebrate victory in
the next two sets, scoring 7:6, 7:0.

The tournament is the first in the series of four largest tennis
tournaments.

Let us remind that the 8th best tennis player of the world David
Nalbandian is participating in the competition with a knee injury.