How Russia is Building Its Leverage in the Caucasus

Asia Times
By M.K. Bhadrakumar
Jan. 17, 2021
A meeting of the leaderships of Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan in the
Kremlin on January 11, exactly two months after the ceasefire in the
44-day Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, can be seen as a robust push by
Moscow to consolidate its diplomatic achievement.
The ceasefire has gained traction and this is the opportune moment for
Russia to flesh out other aspects that were agreed by the three
countries on November 10 in Moscow.
A statement issued after Monday’s meeting underscored an agreement to
establish a tripartite Working Group of Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan
at the deputy-prime-minister level, assisted by sub-groups of experts,
on the following lines:
“The Working Group, by March 1, 2021, will submit for approval at the
highest level by the Parties a list and a schedule for the
implementation of measures involving the restoration and construction
of new transport infrastructure facilities necessary for the
organization, implementation and security of international traffic
carried out through the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of
Armenia, as well as transportations carried out by the Republic of
Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia, which require crossing the
territories of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of
Armenia.”
From subsequent remarks by the president of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev,
his country would have a rail link with Nakhchivan, the Azerbaijani
exclave that borders Turkey and Iran, for the first time in more than
three decades, and landlocked Armenia would get rail links with Russia
and Iran.
From available details, the focus is on a road corridor from mainland
Azerbaijan to Nakhchivan through the 42-kilometer strip that the
Armenian district of Zengezur forms between them. For years, Azeri
mainlanders have been forced to travel to Nakhchivan via Iran and to
Turkey via Georgia.
Armenia, on the other hand, would stand to gain from an all-weather
land route to Russia via Azerbaijan.
The revival of the old rail networks dating back to the late 19th
century – the 1878 Treaty of San Stefano – and the 1921 Treaty of Kars
between Russia and Turkey is also being mentioned.
In principle, a reopening of the 877km Kars-Baku rail link running
through Nakhchivan and Armenia and connecting Russia’s North Caucasus
is possible, which could also be extended southward to the Iranian
city of Tabriz. Turkey fancies all this as a “a strategic corridor”
that would give it direct access to the gas and oil-rich Caspian basin
and Central Asia – and further beyond to China.
Evidently, Russia calculates that “any economic and infrastructure
agreements take on a political nature. If it is about transport
corridors, it means security and some sort of cooperation between the
Armenian and Azerbaijani ethnic groups,” Andrei Kortunov,
director-general of the Russian Council on International Affairs, put
it.
Kortunov estimated that although Monday’s agreements did not address
the core issue, namely, Nagorno-Karabakh’s status as such, which is
“hanging in the air,” the sides are moving in the right direction.
To quote the influential Moscow-based think-tanker, “Even the limited
agreements that have been reached make it possible to say that the
meeting [on Monday] was successful. Transport was taken as a neutral,
technical aspect of relations. With the first step made, the second
and thirds steps are to follow. So the opening of transport
communications should be followed by issues of the exchange of
prisoners, return of refugees, and co-living of two ethnic groups.”
But things are not going to be velvet-smooth. According to Kortunov,
Turkey’s absence from (non-participation in) the Moscow dialogue is
quite demonstrative. He explains tactfully, “It means that Turkey is
an important neighbor that cannot be absolutely excluded from what is
currently going on in the South Caucasus, but the Russian leadership
has once again demonstrated that the key role in this settlement and
post-settlement steps will be played by Moscow.”
For the present, there is a plausible explanation for keeping Turkey
out and looking in, while Moscow assembles the peace blocks. Turkey is
not liking it but is being pragmatic. But if Ankara succeeds in
establishing diplomatic relations with Yerevan, the calculus changes
overnight.
Equally, there are two other critical variables – the political future
of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and, second, Aliyev’s
dalliance with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Again, Iran cannot be liking its exclusion either. The fact of the
matter is that in the disjointed regional tapestry of the past three
decades, Armenia and Azerbaijan have had no choice but to use Iranian
territory for transit, and Tehran is reluctant to give up that
geopolitical trump card.
Above all, while as of now, the Western powers remain passive, the
attitude of the incoming US administration of Joe Biden remains the X
factor.
Last month, the US Congress legislated that “not later than 90 days
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National
Intelligence shall submit to the congressional intelligence committees
a written assessment regarding tensions between the governments of
Armenia and Azerbaijan, including with respect to the status of the
Nagorno Karabakh region.”
Congress has specifically directed the DNI to provide assessment on
the following lines:
    An identification of the strategic interests of the United States
and its partners in the Armenia-Azerbaijan region;
    A description of all significant uses of force in and around the
Nagorno-Karabakh region and the border between Armenia and Azerbaijan
during calendar year 2020, including a description of each significant
use of force and an assessment of who initiated the use of such force;
    An assessment of the effect of US military assistance to
Azerbaijan and Armenia on the regional balance of power and the
likelihood of further use of military force; and,
    An assessment of the likelihood of any further uses of force or
potentially destabilizing activities in the region in the near to
medium term.
Clearly, Washington is gearing up for a geopolitical struggle in the
Caucasus. Moscow probably senses this. And that would explain the
haste with which it is pushing infrastructure development in the South
Caucasus to create equities, while the Biden administration is still
in its infancy.
Russia is pursuing a trajectory to strengthen its position while
keeping the eventuality of having to engage with the Western powers at
some point within the framework of the Minsk Group.
President Vladimir Putin touches base with his French counterpart
Emmanuel Macron every now and then, the two countries being co-chairs
(along with the US) of the Minsk Group. Conceivably, Russia may be
open to working with the West on Nagorno-Karabakh but safeguarding its
legitimate interests. The big question is whether in the present
security environment, that is a realistic expectation.
Meanwhile, US analysts have lately been highlighting China’s growing
involvement in the South Caucasus. In the World Bank’s estimation,
since 2005, Chinese trade turnover with Armenia, Azerbaijan and
Georgia increased by around 2,070%, 380% and 1,885% respectively.
Chinese investments are also increasing, given the Belt and Road
Initiative’s seamless potential to generate business. With the recent
completion of the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railroad, China’s footprint will
rise further, and such economic presence will eventually translate as
political influence.
The geographical location of the South Caucasus countries makes them
viable transit routes for Chinese and European goods. One Chinese
scholar even described Azerbaijan recently as a “pivotal country” in
the BRI’s China-Central Asia-West Asia Economic Corridor. China is
developing a trade route via Kazakhstan that crosses the Caspian from
the Kazakh port of Aktau to Baku, which it visualizes as a BRI hub.
For the US, on the other hand, the Caucasus is vital turf for lighting
fires on Russia’s periphery, for navigating the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization’s expansion eastward, for establishing itself in the
oil-rich Caspian, for controlling one of China’s main trade arteries
to the European market, and for curbing Iran’s influence in the
region.
What should worry Washington most is that there is sufficient
convergence between Russia and China to keep the Caucasus out of the
US geopolitical orbit, especially as NATO is consolidating in the
Black Sea region.
*
M K Bhadrakumar is a former Indian diplomat.
 

PRESS RELEASE – Statement From The Office of AUA President

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Statement from the Office of AUA President 

As the political climate in Armenia continues to remain tense, leading to frequent clashes of political opinions both inside and outside of AUA, the University reaffirms its apolitical stance as an institution. We remain deeply committed to the right to free speech and encourage our staff and faculty to freely share their opinions as individuals. In the email below, addressed to the AUA community on December 23, 2020, AUA President Dr. Karin Markides affirmed this position. 


Date: December 23, 2020

Subject: Respecting Our Diversity of Opinions

In this time of extraordinary stress in our society, I want to express again my praise for the high standard of dedication that students, faculty, and staff continue to use to ensure quality education despite the unprecedented conditions. 

As an educational institution, AUA has a broad and diverse constituency, including faculty, staff, students, alumni, and the administration and trustees. Each member of this institution will have his/her own political opinion, and we encourage them to discuss, elaborate, and communicate their views in a respectful manner. However, while respecting the diversity of opinions among our constituency, as an institution we do not align with any particular political view. It should be widely understood that AUA does not take or condone any particular political positions, and it will continue its mission of supporting the welfare of Armenia and the education of its students. 

 

At AUA, faculty are encouraged to take their individual knowledge, interpretations, views, and opinions outside of the university. With this letter, I reinforce that this individual societal contribution is desired, expected and commendable and it will strengthen AUA as a trustworthy institution, as long as it is without doubt that the word is from individual faculty, staff, or students and who are not speaking for the institution.

As an institution, AUA is governed by trust and an understanding of and commitment to university policies. This collective trust needs continuous processing, and the level of trust can be measured by the undivided support of the AUA community on an institutional level. When the social contract is protected and developed, it will allow for faculty, students, and staff to express individual views on any issue.

It is sad to find that the social contract at AUA is challenged by its own leaders and other honorable members of our community. This contract is defined by our jointly developed policies, and it needs to stay on higher ground and withstand any threats of mistrust. The senior AUA community owes this to the next generation and to the lifelong learners that choose AUA for their education. We all need to live up to this standard, by supporting each other and the AUA brand.

We all understand and respect the pain and emotions that surge through our society, and as a university, we follow the guidelines set by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), in situations when our ideas are considered threatening to religious, political, or social agendas. “When teachers speak or write in public, whether via social media or in academic journals, they are able to articulate their own opinions without the fear from institutional restriction or punishment, but they are encouraged to show restraint and clearly specify that they are not speaking for their institution. In practice, academic freedom is protected by institutional rules and regulations, letters of appointment, faculty handbooks, collective bargaining agreements, and academic custom.” At AUA, these institutional rules are clearly stated in our portfolio of policies. 

Kind regards,

Margarit Hovhannisyan | Communications Manager

Margarit Hovhannisyan|: Communication manager

+374 60 612 514,  

mhovhannisyan  

__________________________________________

American University of Armenia

Republic of Armenia, 0019, Yerevan, Marshal Baghramyan Ave. 40:00

40 Baghramyan Avenue, Yerevan 0019, Republic of Armenia

The ARPA Institute presents: Yervant Zoryan and Raffi Kassarjian on Saturday, January 16 at 10:00 AM PST, on ZOOM

Dear Friends and Compatriots,

 
Please join the ARPA Institute‘s upcoming discussion with the esteemed technologists Yervant Zoryan and Raffi Kassarjian. They will discuss the war and the big picture of what technologies should be developed in Armenia?”The event will be moderated by ARPA Board member Dr. Ani Shabazian.
 
Saturday, January 16, 2021 at 10:00AM, PST (EST 1:00pm, Yerevan 22:00):
 
ZOOM Link and login credentials:
 
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/ 5388322794?pwd= MWJVSU5oTHFnWHJHclcrbDcxMXJiQT 09 
Meeting ID:         538 832 2794
Password:           381750 
 
Or you can join via Facebook Live!
 
https://www.facebook.com/ ARPAInstitute 
 
Thank you for your continued support of the ARPA Institute and we hope that you will join the webcast!
Prior ARPA Lectures (Just click on the title):

1. Consequences of the War in Artsakh and its Implications , Eric Hacopian
2 Artsakh war and its consequences, Arman Grigoryan
3. Armenia in 2600 Years of World Cartographic Heritage, by Rouben Galchian
4. Assessment of the Military Offensive by Azerbaijan and Turkey , Anna Ohanyan, Nerses Kopalyan and Arman Grigoryan, Moderator Hon. Armen Baibourtian, Consul General of Armenia.
Warm regards,
The ARPA Institute Board
 

Armenia: protests over alleged Pashinyan-Aliev meeting, rumored territory surrender

JAM News
Jan 8 2021

    JAMnews, Yerevan
  

For several days now, Armenia has been caught up in persistent discussions of a proposed meeting of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and President Ilham Aliyev that is to take place in Moscow. 

Telegram channels have even announced the date of the meeting – January 11, all despite the fact both of the sides are yet to confirm their attendance.  

Armenian media is also covering the meeting extensively, reporting on how preparation for the PM’s visit to Moscow is in full motion and reporting on the specific documents that Pashinyan is to sign. 

According to various reports, the documents that have allegedly already been sent to the Armenian Ministry of Justice include the following clauses:

  • a corridor will be opened through Armenia, connecting Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan,
  • some territories of Armenia will be transferred to Azerbaijan,
  • Armenian troops will be withdrawn from Nagorno-Karabakh.

A picket near the Ministry of Justice demanding the authorities refute information ‘about the signing of another humiliating agreement with Azerbaijan’ was held earlier today.

Amidst the ongoing unrest, Nikol Pashinyan posted on his Facebook page about the priorities of Armenia and the order of implementation of the points of the trilateral agreement on the ceasefire in Karabakh signed with Azerbaijan on the night of November 10, 2020. His post was regarded by many as a response to the spreading rumours about the surrender of the territories and a corridor through Armenia to Nakhichevan.


  • The biggest headlines in Armenia in 2020
  • Everything known about Armenian PoWs in Azerbaijan


What the prime minister said

Nikol Pashinyan stated that the top priority for Yerevan is the full implementation of the 8th clause of the agreement – on the exchange of prisoners, hostages and detainees, as well as the bodies of the deceased. Only after that is fully set into motion would the Armenian authorities be ready to consider resuming the transport and economic communications in the region.

According to PM Pashinyan this would involve cargo transportation from Armenia to Russia and the Islamic Republic of Iran via the territory of Azerbaijan, and transport communications from Azerbaijan to Nakhichevan via the territory of Armenia.

“I, once again draw attention to the fact that the November 10 statement does not mention ‘corridor’, neither in relation to ‘Meghri’ nor to any other territory of Armenia.”

“The choice of communication routes from Armenia to Russia and from Azerbaijan to Nakhichevan is a separate topic for negotiations, the effectiveness of which will depend heavily on the exchange of prisoners, hostages, other held persons, the bodies of the deceased, as well as the increasing of the scale and effectiveness of the search for those reported as missing”, wrote the Armenian PM. 

Unrest at the Ministry of Justice

Former Deputy Minister of Justice and the head of human rights organization, Legal Way, Ruben Melikyan made an urgent appeal to organise a picket outside of the Ministry of Justice building.

He commented on Nikol Pashinyan’s post, specifically on the part of it that mentions the trilateral agreement on Karabakh which does not contain words ‘Meghri’ or ‘corridor’ going through the territory of Armenia. According to Melikyan, the same document does not say anything about the Armenian village of Shurnukh, but “the enemy had reached it too.”

The human rights activist was referring to approximately 12 houses in Shurnukh village of the Syunik region of Armenia that were transferred to Azerbaijan on January 5 in the process of redrawing the borders between the countries.

Melikyan called on the authorities to officially refute the information that on January 11th “it is planned to sign another humiliating agreement with Azerbaijan.”

As a result, Minister of Justice, Rustam Badasyan came out to the protesters and assured them that there were no “secret agreements” made with Azerbaijan:

“I reaffirm that the Ministry of Justice holds no agreements with Azerbaijan, and any speculations about it are completely false.”

Badasyan urged the public not to trust the telegram channels, as in recent years, disinformation has often been spread to cause panic among the residents of the country.

Azerbaijan Archbishop: Our Holy Mission Is to Keep Peace

Christianity Today
Jan 5 2021
In exclusive interview, head of Russian Orthodox Church in Baku invites defeated Armenians into economic cooperation after Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and laments lost ethnic fraternity.
|
Image: Aziz Karimov / Getty Images
Archbishop Alexander of the Baku-Azerbaijan Diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church prays during a 2020 Easter service at the Holy Myrrhbearers Cathedral in Baku, Azerbaijan.

Editor’s note: CT’s previous coverage of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict can be found here.

The saying is clear: To the victor go the spoils.

And morally, with it comes the burden of peace.

In November, Christian-heritage Armenia surrendered to Muslim-majority Azerbaijani forces besieging the Caucasus mountain area of Nagorno-Karabakh. The ceasefire agreement ended a six-week war that cost each side roughly 3,000 soldiers, and left unsettled the final status of the Armenian-populated enclave they call Artsakh.

Azerbaijan, however, recovered the rest of its internationally recognized territory, including the historic city of Shushi. The first Karabakh war ended in 1994, and displaced hundreds of thousands from their homes on both sides.

Archbishop Alexander, head of the Russian Orthodox Church in Azerbaijan, reached out to CT to promote a process of reconciliation.

It will not be easy.

Azerbaijanis returning to Adgam, left in ruins by Armenian occupation for 25 years, will see for the first time the damage to their once 30,000-populated city. Its mosque was relabeled “Persian,” while 63 of Nagorno-Karabakh’s 67 mosques are said to be razed to the ground.

Meanwhile, Catholicos Karekin II, head of the Armenian Apostolic Church, issued a plea to save the ancient heritage of Armenian church properties lost in the war. In 2005, a gravesite containing sixth-century khatchkar crosses was destroyed in the Azerbaijani enclave of Nakhchivan.

Azerbaijan has pledged to preserve them. But the United Nations’s cultural arm UNESCO stated that its authorities have failed to respond to several requests to deploy an independent fact-finding mission.

Meanwhile, members of Azerbaijan’s Christian Udi minority were dispatched to hold services in the ninth-century Dadivank Monastery. The Udi are related to the Caucasian Albanian Christians, assimilated into other ethnic groups a thousand years ago. But Azerbaijan maintains the churches of the region are actually “Albanian,” and not Armenian in origin.

International academics find it difficult to examine all the historical sources. But one nonaligned expert stated the theory has “little currency outside of Azerbaijan,” calling it “bizarre.”

Efforts at reconciliation must also overcome the trauma of war.

Azerbaijan stated that 100 civilians were killed in the shelling of populated areas, while Armenia stated at least 55 civilians were killed. Human Rights Watch condemned the use of cluster munitions on both sides.

Amnesty International has similarly documented video footage showing mistreatment of captured soldiers—including decapitations.

Alexander, elevated to archbishop in 2012, is not a neutral peacemaker.

Early in the war, he signed an Azerbaijani interfaith letter congratulating President Ilham Aliyev on his military victories. A later letter pledged that Azerbaijan was not seeking the displacement of Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh, and offered them autonomy.

But after the war, amid claims of Azerbaijan erasing Armenian cultural heritage, a third letter endorsed the Albanian origin of churches, and defended the nation’s multireligious character.

Aliyev has since retracted the offer of autonomy.

Of Azerbaijan’s 10 million population, 96 percent are Muslim—roughly two-thirds Shiite and one-third Sunni. Alexander’s Russian Orthodox represent two-thirds of Christians, while over 15,000 Jews date back to the Old Testament era.

A peacemaker, however, does not need to be neutral, only committed.

Speaking through a translator, Alexander described his experience of past good relations between Armenians and Azerbaijanis, his hope for future economic cooperation, and his present willingness to meet with Catholicos Karekin II:

What is your vision for reconciliation?

We are both eastern Christian communities, and we have much in common.

At the same time, 1,500 years of separation between the Eastern Orthodox church and the Armenian Apostolic church has complicated relations. We have holy books and traditions in common, but we are not in fellowship.

Both of us have been living among Muslims since Islam was introduced in our region. But the manner of living has been very different. The Orthodox church in Azerbaijan found a way to live together with Muslims, but Armenians did not.

Relations were not always like this. Thirty years ago, many Armenians lived here in Azerbaijan, and they had their own churches where they could pray. The proof of these good relations are mixed marriages between them. Peoples in the same geographical areas have to find ways to live together, and not focus on their differences.

This is the main principle for how future relations between these two nations can be built. France, Germany, and Poland are an example. They endured many wars, but now they are all in one European Union.

What is Azerbaijan prepared to do to heal the wounds of this conflict?

Peace between the countries is a way to avoid the isolation Armenia suffers, with Azerbaijan, and perhaps with Turkey.

Transportation networks can be built, helping Armenian development. Political, economic, and cultural areas of cooperation exist with the south Caucasus nation of Georgia. Azerbaijan has repeatedly invited Armenia into this network, with the one condition of returning the occupied territories.

Azerbaijan has a high level of multicultural acceptance, and preserves its religious monuments. The Armenian churches and libraries in Baku are kept safe. In the case of a peace agreement, these can be used again, as they should. This will also help the spiritual and religious reconciliation.

In Matthew, Jesus says if your brother has something against you, then you must go to him to be reconciled. Armenians have issues against Azerbaijanis. Even if they are wrong, how can Azerbaijani Christians reconcile in Christ after this conflict?

Unfortunately, Armenians have lied to themselves.

Baku had a whole Armenian quarter in the Soviet era, living in better condition than other citizens. I travel to Russia, Georgia, Belarus, and other nations, and I see that Armenians raised in Baku communicate with Azerbaijanis as friends. They are very sorry they had to leave.

In the modern Christian world, unfortunately, there is no unity. We have a lot in common, but we cannot pray together. It is a great sorrow and pain of modern Christianity. When I meet Armenians, we discuss many things, but we cannot pray together.

Are you able to make a phone call to Catholicos Karekin II?

I know him, and we have had many discussions. But I don’t have his phone number [smiling].

What would you want to say to him now, in order to help make peace?

I would tell him he has respect in Azerbaijan as a religious leader. He can do a lot to reduce the tensions and hate that Armenians have toward Azerbaijan. So much depends on him.

What would you want the Catholicos to say or do in this time of conflict?

It is a time to stop discussions about negative issues, and to discuss common ground together—what unites us, not divides. Our common ground can be a common future: cooperation in economy, culture, and human rights.

In order to have peace with God, we must confess our sins. In times of war, both sides have sinned against each other. If you agree, what is it that Azerbaijan can apologize for, and seek forgiveness?

It is complicated. Islam as a religion has no confession. Of course, both sides did many negative actions.

As for confession, there is the example of Poland and Germany. They needed 50 years to understand that they were wrong during World War II. This is why we need peace, the building of new life. Only after this can we gain such a realization.

We need years, maybe a dozen years. That is why it is difficult to speak of confession right now.

Many Armenians are fearful of a new genocide. It does take many years to create peace, but God is greater than politics. Spiritual peace can come before political peace. Perhaps neither Islam nor the government have the capacity for confession. But it might help Armenians if you were able to confess some of the sins of your nation.

I carefully listened to your question.

But when the word genocide is used, we should be very careful. We have very sad facts about the actions of Armenian forces on the territory of Azerbaijan. We have thousands of Azerbaijanis killed from the Armenian side, so to whom should we address the word genocide?

Azerbaijanis still remember its ethnic character. That is why I think it is impossible to use the term in this situation. We will have accusations from both sides.

If there is to be peace and reconciliation, especially between Christians, then Armenians must apologize for their role. But what can be said from the Azerbaijan side, as the victorious party in this current conflict?

It is an interesting question.

We remember that in the first Karabakh war, Azerbaijan lost.

The victory of Armenia was due to the several problems going on in the Soviet Union. When it collapsed, countries appeared without military forces. Armenia won because the Soviet military forces left, and we did not have our own. But Armenia had prepared their own military forces.

That is why they won the first war, without resistance from the Azerbaijani side.

But these bloody events did not happen according to the will of Azerbaijani people, it was the will of ex-Soviet leadership.

In the first Karabakh war, we cannot say that Azerbaijan bears responsibility for these events. It was the Soviet leadership that created the negative situation in the south Caucasus.

In 1990, our cathedral church was totally destroyed by a missile. That has nothing to do with Azerbaijanis or Armenians. It is the responsibility of the Soviet military that entered Baku.

People from those times must confess. Both Azerbaijan and Armenia are their victims. So it is ridiculous to say that Azerbaijanis and Armenians cannot live together. Azerbaijanis do not have hate in their heart.

But as for the lands and the territory, the rule is strict. What is mine is mine, and yours is yours. That is why we had this recent war.

Jesus also said that when your brother sins against you, you must go to him privately. Armenians have sinned against Azerbaijanis. Will you be willing to go to Armenia and speak with the Catholicos?

I could speak to him face-to-face, in private. If the conditions are right, I will go.

The Bible also says: Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God. Our holy mission is always to keep peace.

But it is better to do it on neutral ground.

Beside the Catholicos, there is also a nation. Citizens of Armenia are very tense at this moment. They have made many negative statements against the Catholicos, their prime minister, President Putin, and of course against Azerbaijan.

But a meeting in a neutral place is possible.


Armenian government plans to launch new projects for assisting Artsakh people

Save

Share

 15:25, 5 January, 2021

YEREVAN, JANUARY 5, ARMENPRESS. President of Artsakh Arayik Harutyunyan received today Armenia’s Minister of Labor and Social Affairs Mesrop Arakelyan, the Presidential Office told Armenpress.

Issues relating to solving the social problems of the residents of Artsakh who remained without shelters due to the recent war and have temporarily settled in Armenia were discussed during the meeting.

The Artsakh President highlighted the importance of social assistance programs being implemented by the Armenian government, expressing hope that they will manage to ensure a secure social environment for the Artsakh people with joint efforts.

Minister Arakelyan assured that assisting the people of Artsakh is one of the main priorities of the ministry and added that the government is planning to launch new projects for that purpose.

Weather forecast in Armenia

Save

Share

 14:56, 2 January, 2021

YEREVAN, JANUARY 2, ARMENPRESS. The ministry of emergency situations reports that in the daytime of January 2, on January 3-7 no precipitation is expected in Armenia.

The air temperature will not change considerably.

TURKISH press: Ancient Urartian caves of Tunceli to be restored in eastern Turkey

The cave rooms photographed in Tunceli, eastern Turkey, Dec. 29, 2020. (DHA Photo)

Ancient Urartian cave rooms in the Çemişgezek district of eastern Turkey’s Tunceli are expected to boost tourism in the city. The cave rooms, which were carved out by ancient people to create a settlement area, will be restored thanks to a project by the local district municipality.

Located in the hidden paradise of Tağar Creek Valley, the prehistoric cave rooms are a natural and archaeological protected site. Although the cavernous holes attract thousands of visitors every season of the year, they are mostly in ruins and have been targeted by treasure hunters for many years. Çemişgezek Municipality has embarked on a project to restore the caves back to their former glory.

Mehmet Güder, district governor of Çemişgezek, authorized the project that was approved by the Fırat Development Agency, a state-funded organization to help the local development of the region. The restoration and the related environmental planning consist of a suspension bridge for ease of accessibility, a walking trail, decorative lighting and restoration of the caves while protecting their historical texture.

“The project will boost tourism in the district that is home to cultural, historical and natural attractions,” Güder said. “We are working extremely hard on this project to ensure that the caves which were human-made nearly 3,000 years ago during the Urartu civilization, a ninth-century B.C. kingdom located in modern-day eastern Anatolia, are accessible and enjoyable to the public. Thankfully Fırat Development Agency has greenlit the project in recent days and efforts will continue according to plan,” he said.

Historically several names have been given to the mountain houses in these caves, including “Derviş (Dervish) cells” and “den holes.” The ancient architects of the caves are thought to be from the Urartian civilization.

The scenic view from a cave room in Tunceli, eastern Turkey, Dec. 29, 2020. (DHA Photo)

The settlement complex consists of four stories and features 25 rooms with natural heating systems and long corridors with large scenic windows. The topmost flat, called “Bey Odası” (“Bey’s Chambers”), is a stone kiosk of sorts with an indoor pool but is almost impossible to reach due to the narrow stairs and corridors. There are also underground water reservoirs that collect fresh rainwater that seeps through the rock. Whether these reservoirs are natural or human-made is unknown.

The caves are one of the most intriguing and fascinating sights in Tunceli. Güder stated that they are determined not to alter the natural and historical texture of the site and will be using wood for the restoration project. “We have plans for a wooden suspension bridge, a walking trail with wooden railing and external installations of lighting.”

“We have acquired approval from Erzurum Cultural and Natural Heritage Preservation Foundation, for the project,” he added. “This project will boost tourism in Çemişgezek and Tunceli, and will be an important part of our regional and national heritage.”

Putin, Macron discuss situation in Nagorno Karabakh

Public Radio of Armenia
Dec 22 2020

Russian President Vladimir Putin had a telephone conversation with President of the French Republic Emmanuel Macron.

The situation around Nagorno-Karabakh was thoroughly discuss. The President of Russia stressed that the situation in the region is stabilizing, and the agreements, enshrined in the Statement of the leaders of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia – are generally being consistently implemented.

The parties emphasized the successful work of the Russian peacekeepers, providing, at the request of Baku and Yerevan, the ceasefire and the safety of the civilian population.

They reaffirmed their mutual readiness to continue coordination on various aspects of the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement, in particular, within the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group.

Among the most urgent issues were the humanitarian problems associated with the return of refugees, the restoration of infrastructure, the preservation of religious and cultural monuments, in particular through the International Center for Humanitarian Response.


​Aliyev says resolutions supporting Artsakh mean nothing to Azerbaijan

News.am, Armenia
Dec 24 2020
 
 
Aliyev says resolutions supporting Artsakh mean nothing to Azerbaijan
21:45, 24.12.2020
 
President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev has declared that he views the allegations against Baku in the resolutions that several Western countries adopted after the military conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh as groundless, RIA Novosti reported.
 
“Let the countries having adopted those resolutions against us open their eyes and see. Open your eyes, hypocritical politicians. Your deputies have adopted a resolution. Those resolutions mean nothing to us, they are pieces of paper. However, the fact of the matter is that they are making groundless allegations against us,” he said.