Armenian parliamentary standing committee approves bill on ratifying EAEU-Serbia free trade deal

Save

Share

 11:07,

YEREVAN, APRIL 12, ARMENPRESS. The Armenian parliamentary standing committee on regional and Eurasian integration affairs approved the bill on ratifying the free trade agreement between the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and Serbia.

Deputy minister of economy of Armenia Varos Simonyan introduced the bill at today’s session of the standing committee.

“The bill proposes to ratify the free trade agreement between the EAEU, its members and Serbia, which was signed in Moscow on October 25, 2019”, the deputy minister said.

The agreement contains tools for regulation of obligations aimed at ensuring the stability, predictability and transparency of the trade processes.

Armenia, as well as the other member states of the Eurasian Economic Union, will have an access to the Serbian market with privileged customs duties and tariff advantages. In order to improve the access to the EAEU market, additional export opportunities have been created for all member states of the Union at the expense of making some concessions to the Serbian side.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

April 7 – World Health Day

Save

Share

 10:49, 7 April, 2021

YEREVAN, APRIL 7, ARMENPRESS. The World Health Organization has declared April 7 as the World Health Day symbolizing the establishment of the structure in 1948.

This year this day is being celebrated under the following title: “Building a fairer, healthier world”.

“Our world is an unequal one. As COVID-19 has highlighted, some people are able to live healthier lives and have better access to health services than others – entirely due to the conditions in which they are born, grow, live, work and age.

All over the world, some groups struggle to make ends meet with little daily income, have poorer housing conditions and education, fewer employment opportunities, experience greater gender inequality, and have little or no access to safe environments, clean water and air, food security and health services. This leads to unnecessary suffering, avoidable illness, and premature death. And it harms our societies and economies.

This is not only unfair: it is preventable. That’s why we are calling on leaders to ensure that everyone has living and working conditions that are conducive to good health.  At the same time we urge leaders to monitor health inequities, and to ensure that all people are able to access quality health services when and where they need them. 

COVID-19 has hit all countries hard, but its impact has been harshest on those communities which were already vulnerable, who are more exposed to the disease, less likely to have access to quality health care services and more likely to experience adverse consequences as a result of measures implemented to contain the pandemic”, the World Health Organization said in a statement.

Asbarez: Deadline Extended for Armenian Caucus Arts Scholarships

April 8, 2021



California Armenian Legislative Caucus Scholarship flyer

The deadline for the California Armenian Legislative Caucus’ two scholarship contests for the 2021 commemoration of the Armenian Genocide has been extended. California high school students in 9th through 12th grade are invited to participate in an essay contest and/or a visual arts contest to increase greater awareness of the Armenian Genocide on its anniversary.

All winners will be contacted directly and announced to mainstream and Armenian media by the California Armenian Legislative Caucus on Friday, June 25. All winners will be awarded scholarships and receive special recognition from the members of the Armenian Caucus. Original artwork will be requested from visual arts applicants if they are selected as a finalist, for possible display in the California State Capitol.

Criteria for each contest are detailed below. Students may enter both contests, but submissions must be entered separately.

Essay Scholarship Awards:

First Place: $1,000

Second Place: $750

Third Place: $500

Visual Art Scholarship Awards:

First Place: $1,000

Second Place: $750

Third Place: $500

Submission Deadline for both contests is Tuesday, June 15. Any submissions sent after the deadline will not be accepted.

Essay Criteria:

Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Twitter have grown exponentially, especially during the 2020 pandemic. Many individuals, businesses and organizations use Facebook and other platforms to share various information, including the news. It is important that this information is factual, unbiased and true. The spread of falsified, distorted and inaccurate information on social media can be dangerous, especially when this information is circulated amongst millions of users.

In 2018, Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, stated that he did not think that Facebook should censor or remove what “Holocaust deniers”—as he called them—posted on their accounts because he said that there are things that various people get wrong. However, in October 2020, he changed his decision and stated that Facebook would now ban content that distorts or denies the Holocaust, due to an increase in anti-Semitic violence.

This year’s essay prompt asks contestants to write a letter to Mark Zuckerberg, urging that Facebook take the same course of action against denial and distorted posts regarding the 1915 Armenian Genocide as they have with the Holocaust. Reflect on Facebook’s updated Community Standards regarding the Holocaust:

**Please note that Section III. Objectionable Content, Sub Section 12. Hate Speech, Tier 1 includes much more content that is not allowed on Facebook. The information above is limited to just the specific content regarding the Holocaust for your reference on where the policy language can be found. There is more information listed under this sub section.

All submissions must be received by the California Armenian Legislative Caucus electronically on or before the submission deadline of Tuesday, June 15 at [email protected].

Please include your name, age, address, high school and grade along with the teacher’s name, email address and subject area at the top of the essay.

Please save submissions using your name as the document title and email as an attachment to [email protected]Any submissions sent after the deadline will not be accepted.

Visual Art Criteria:

This year’s theme is “Human to Human Interaction.” All applicants must develop their submission in keeping with this theme.

  1. Personal statement (300-500 words) explaining the artwork and how it connects to the theme of human-to-human interaction. In the top left corner, applicant must include: name, age, primary address, high school, grade, teacher’s name and subject (if applicable), phone number, and email address (this information will not count as part of the total word count).
  2. Only two-dimensional, visual art submissions will be accepted. Submission types are limited to drawings, paintings, photographs, digital illustrations, and graphic design.
  3. Submissions may not exceed an 11×17 frame and must weigh less than 25 pounds.
  4. Submissions may not include any nudity, excessive and/or graphic violence, racial slurs, derogatory and/or offensive language, profanity, and may not make use of or replicate existing artwork. All submissions must be original work created by the applicant.

Submission Contents

  1. Email subject, as well as titles of the attached document, must be formatted as follows: “CALC – Student Name – Title of Piece” (e.g. CALC – William Saroyan – The Time of Your Life).
  2. Submissions must include the personal statement and meet the criteria listed.
  3. Submissions must include a high-definition photograph of the artwork, be sure to take a close up picture with enough lighting for the reviewers to see the detail of the work. It is acceptable to submit up to five photos. Be aware of the lighting of the piece and provide different angles to showcase the depth of the artwork.
  4. Submissions must include one recent high-definition photograph of the applicant, suitable for publication (e.g. cap and gown photos, professional headshots, or quality photographs/close-ups of the applicant).

All submissions must be received by the California Armenian Legislative Caucus electronically on or before the submission deadline of Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at [email protected].

Please include your name, age, address, high school, and grade along with the teacher’s name, email address and subject area at the top of the essay.

Please save submissions using your name as the document title and email as an attachment to [email protected]Any submissions sent after the deadline will not be accepted.

For Historical Context for Both Contests:
http://www.Armenian-Genocide.org

Mark Zuckerberg’s original statement regarding “Holocaust deniers” from 2018:
https://www.vox.com/explainers/2018/7/20/17590694/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-holocaust-denial-recode

Authorities should have demanded our prisoners before ceding Karvachar district, the parent of a missing soldier says

Panorama, Armenia
April 9 2021

Parents of Armenian prisoners of war (POWs) being held in Azerbaijan are determined to stay outside the Ministry of Defense and continue their protest until they receive responses to all their questions. 

“We will stay here and not go home. We demand the immediate return of our sons, yet we have not been received by anyone in the past two days,” one of the parents told reporters. In his words, if the authorities worked hard for the return of the prisoners, they would have probably yielded a result. 

“It is said that Azerbaijan refused to leave the prisoners yesterday. That is the answer repeated all the time. Our response is why then did you cede Karvachar region? You should have demanded the captives before handing the region over to them,” said the parent. He added he had not heard about his son since October 14, 2020. 

“He had been serving a month and half when he was taken to combat positions. No one is responsible for that. I assume he has been taken captive as we received a phone call from Azerbaijani number and informed he was with them. If he was not in Azerbaijan how could I get the call?” the parent was asking. 

‘Armenia is facing a demographic catastrophe’

Mercator
March 29 2021
The ancient nation in the Caucasus is in danger of disappearing

The 22-metre high statue of Mother Armenia in the capital, Yeveran / BIGSTOCK

“Armenia is facing a demographic catastrophe,” Nune Pashayan, a health department official, told a news conference last week. The government plans to triple funding for reproductive programs.

Mr Pashayan cited a number of statistics. The fertility rate is 1.6 children per woman (and needs to be 2.1 to maintain the population). According to the latest data, 14.9% of women and 9.5% of men are infertile.

Eduard Hambardzumyan, founder of the Fertility Center and president of the Reproductive Health Association, told local media that Armenia is caught between high infertility and low rate of fertility. The Armenian population is currently about 2.9 million. By the end of the 21st century, its population could be halved – 1.5 million fewer Armenians. This is a “creeping genocide”, he said ominously.

Bad as this sounds, the figures could actually be worse. Apparently the official statistics include hundreds of thousands who have emigrated for work and live in the country only for a few weeks a year.

There is another problem. According to UNICEF, “Armenia has one of the highest rates of gender-biased sex selection in the world.” In 2018, 111 boys were born in Armenia for every 100 girls.

Armenia, about the size of Belgium or the American state of Maryland, is a landlocked nation in the Caucasus region. Wedged in between Turkey, Georgia, Russia, Iran and Azerbaijan, it is located in one of the most volatile parts of the world, geopolitically speaking. Small as it is, it is fighting a forever war with its neighbour Azerbaijan over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. Thousands of soldiers and civilians have died and hundreds of thousands have been displaced by ethnic cleansing.

In a fascinating overview of Armenia’s demographic woes in Eurasia Daily Monitor last year, Armen Grigoryan noted that previous presidents had predicted a vibrant and growing population. Former president Serzh Sargsyan (2008–2018) declared in 2017 that by 2040 the population could be 4 million. His successor, Nikol Pashinyan, suggested in 2019 that by 2050 it could be 5 million.

Immediately after the catastrophic explosion in Beirut in August last year, a thousand Lebanese Armenians moved to Armenia. But immigration from the large Armenian diaspora in Russia, the United States, France, Canada, Argentina, Belgium, Germany, Poland, Spain and Syria is unrealistic if there is high unemployment.

In 2018, an editorial in Armenian Weekly, an English-language publication, declared sombrely:

“The first 30 years of independence set in motion a demographic crisis so deep and lasting that it is unclear whether anything can be done today to rectify it. The resulting national security issues for Armenia are so serious as to jeopardize the viability of the country for the next 30 years.”  

Armenia has suffered, endured and survived disaster after disaster. It has been conquered by the Sassanid Persians, the Romans, the Parthians, the Byzantines, the Arabs, the Seljuk Turks, the Ottoman Turks, the Safavid Persians, and the Russians. But its people have survived and maintained their proud and distinctive culture. The Armenian alphabet, invented by the scholarly monk Mesrop Mashtots in 405AD, is unique, with its 39 letters. It was the first nation in the world – in 301AD – to adopt Christianity as a state religion. Around the world, Armenians of the diaspora have contributed to cultural and social life – from influencer Kim Kardashian to crooner Charles Aznavour to business magnate Kirk Kerkorian.

After 2,500 years, is this great record of suffering, faith, creativity, energy and achievement destined to flicker out in the global demographic winter? If not, it will take more than government subsidies for IVF to revive Armenians’ desire to have large families.

“Slaves to Turkey”: A former child soldier on Turkey’s teenaged Syrian mercenaries

Panorama, Armenia
March 29 2021
Politics 13:01 29/03/2021Region

American reporter Lindsey Snell published another article about the use of mercenaries by Turkey in various wars. In the article on North Press Agency, the journalist reveals that Turkey has recruited young children and made them mercenaries. The full article is below. 

In 2012, as the revolution in Syria exploded, Fajr Maaliki (a pseudonym) was 12 years old and in the 6th grade. Maaliki’s large extended family stretched across the Idlib countryside, and when the Free Syrian Army (FSA) formed to fight against the Syrian government, many of his relatives joined. “Around 40 of the men in my family became FSA fighters. My father didn’t join the FSA, but he supported them.”

Maaliki was 13 years old when pro-government militias neared the outskirts of his village and he first took up arms. “I went with my cousins,” he recalled. “At this point, none of us had really had any training. It didn’t matter. We went and we fought.”

Maaliki was supposed to take an Arabic exam at school the day he went to his first battle. “I missed that exam and didn’t go back to school again,” he said. “When I got home that night, my mother cried and begged me not to fight again, but of course, I did.” Maaliki’s male relatives had no issue with his young age. Neither did his first FSA commander, who praised him for leaving school to join the fight.

Much of Maaliki’s teen years unfolded on Syrian battlefields. “There were some dangerous times. When I was 14 years old, I was fighting in a battle in the northern countryside of Aleppo. My faction was besieged by the Assad regime, and many of them were killed. I was stuck in one place for three days with one other boy my age. We ate from the garbage. When the siege was finally broken, I think we were both surprised to get out alive.”

Maaliki says roughly a dozen teenagers from his village joined the FSA in the first two years of the war. “Fighting seemed more important than anything else. Back then, there weren’t as many child soldiers in the Syrian opposition as there are now, but it wasn’t uncommon,” he said.

In September 2014, ISIS was approaching the peak of its power in Syria. The group had started to fight against the Free Syrian Army and Al-Nusra Front, Syria’s al-Qaeda affiliate, despite having previously allied with both in the fight against Syrian government forces. While embedded with the FSA on a reporting trip, I visited the frontlines against ISIS in the northern countryside of Aleppo for an MSNBC documentary. As I filmed the fighters preparing for battle, I saw a boy who looked no older than 13 years old carrying an AK-47. “Can you ask him how old he is?” I asked one of the English-speaking fighters.

“This is my brother,” he replied. “He’s 17. He just looks younger.”

In 2014, the United States launched the Train and Equip Program, which aimed to provide training and weaponry to select “moderate” factions of the FSA to enable them to fight ISIS. One of the key factions selected was Harakat Hazm, which had thousands of fighters in and around Aleppo and Idlib.

In March 2015, Al-Nusra Front attacked Harakat Hazm, effectively dissolving the faction. The weapons and other aid given to Hazm by the US government were stolen by Nusra. Nusra became more powerful in Idlib and Aleppo, erecting checkpoints outside of their own territories and exerting more control over FSA factions.

While ISIS’ brutality became universally known, both through its actions in Syria and Iraq and in the slickly-produced propaganda films it proudly disseminated, Al-Nusra Front, Syria’s al-Qaeda affiliate, seemed almost gentle by comparison. “Nusra was kinder to the civilians than ISIS, and they offered higher salaries and better training for fighters than the Free Syrian Army, so they became more popular. Many FSA fighters left to join Nusra,” Fajr Maaliki said. “And then, Nusra started to recruit children.”

Maaliki said that Abdullah al-Muhaysini, a Saudi Arabian salafist cleric who served as a leader in Al-Nusra Front, became a fixture at mosques in Maaliki’s area. “He would come with Nusra fighters from each neighborhood, and they would meet with men to encourage them to join Nusra. They held camps to preach to local children and recruit them to fight, too.”

In a video filmed at a youth indoctrination event in Idlib, Muhaysini said that boys joining Nusra should be at least 15 years old. Maaliki says he personally knew several boys who began fighting for Nusra when they were 13 or 14. “In 2016, when the major battle between the Assad regime and the Syrian opposition for Aleppo started, my FSA faction went there to fight. We were fighting alongside Al-Nusra Front, and I ran into a Nusra member I’d met before. His name was Mustafa Waasel. He was killed by shelling in that battle, in the first week of June 2016. He was 14 years old when he died.”

Maaliki continued to fight for the Syrian opposition as the years dragged on. “2016 and 2017 were the hardest years for me. The Syrian opposition factions were not paying fighters consistently. I couldn’t buy shoes. I could barely buy food. I was 16 and 17 years old at the time,” he said.

Then, in December 2017, most factions of the Free Syrian Army were merged into the so-called Syrian National Army (SNA), which was under the direct supervision and support of the Turkish government. “After this, the payments to fighters were made more consistently. We were hopeful that things would improve for the Syrian opposition. But then, the Afrin operation began,” Maaliki said.

In January 2018, Turkey launched Operation “Olive Branch,” attacking the predominantly Kurdish city of Afrin in northern Syria. The Turkish Air Force bombed the city, and the Turkish-backed SNA factions unleashed a ground offensive. “As Turkey started recruiting more men to fill these SNA factions for their Afrin operation, they started recruiting more children, too,” Maaliki said. “And that continues to this day. There are so many children among the SNA factions now.”

Maaliki says the SNA fighters were misled about the true purpose of the operation in Afrin. “The Turks told us the YPG [a predominantly Kurdish, US-allied militia] and ISIS were working together to fight us from Afrin. They said the YPG wanted to do what Israel has done; to create a state within Syria just for the Kurds, and that they would try to occupy Idlib, and the Aleppo countryside, all the way to Latakia.

“But when I was in Afrin after the invasion began, I saw how the SNA factions robbed the civilians, and kidnapped them, and raped women,” Maaliki continued. “I saw Turkey occupy Afrin. We were not fighting Assad in Afrin. The battle had nothing to do with our revolution against the Syrian regime.”

Eventually, Maaliki was assigned to work as a prison guard in Afrin. “There was a very old man arrested by the Hamza Division [faction of the SNA],” he recalled. “He was too old to even walk properly. I asked one of the commanders why he had been arrested, and he said the man planned to plant a bomb in one of our military points. I knew this wasn’t true. I could tell by looking at the old man that he wouldn’t be able to do anything like this.

“When I was left alone with the man, I asked him what really happened,” Maaliki continued. “He told me the Hamza Division men had stormed his home for the purpose of stealing it. They arrested him, but before they brought him to the prison, they raped his daughter in the next room.”

The prisoner gave Maaliki the exact location of his home in the Ashrafieh neighborhood or Afrin. “Go there,” the prisoner told him. “You will see that there are soldiers in my home. You will know I am telling the truth.”

A short time later, Maaliki left the SNA, returned to Idlib. He considers himself an activist now, and he closely monitors the situation in his and other opposition-held areas. “Right now, I have estimated that there are more than 500 children between the different factions,” Maaliki said. “It is because of their extreme poverty. They aren’t fighting for a cause. They are just trying to survive. Turkey is preying on all of them.”

Maaliki began collecting photos and information on child militants in the SNA. “I felt bad for them, because I was a child who fought, and I don’t want them to have the experiences I did. But they’re in a worse situation than I was. When the war started, I could read. Most of the child fighters today cannot read. Many of their fathers have died fighting. They are being taken advantage of by Turkey and the corrupt SNA commanders.”

Before Maaliki left Afrin in 2018, he recalls walking by a headquarters for the Sultan Murad faction of the SNA. “I heard music and laughing, so I stopped to look in the windows,” he said. “I thought I saw two women dancing in front of three Sultan Murad commanders. But once I looked more closely, I saw that they were young boys dressed in women’s clothing.” Maaliki said that once the men began raping the two boys, he could no longer bear to watch and fled the scene.

Maaliki says the practice of Syrian opposition commanders sexually abusing male children has existed since the beginning of the war in Syria, but that it is more common now than ever before. He cites Turkey’s involvement in the Libyan conflict as a major factor.

In December 2019, Turkey struck a deal with the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord (GNA) and began deploying thousands of Syrian National Army militants to Tripoli and Misrata. In interviews conducted with Libya-based SNA members, they revealed that the GNA forces have gone to great lengths to keep the majority of them apart from the local civilian population.

“Now that Turkey has sent the SNA factions to Libya, there are SNA commanders who don’t have access to women,” Maaliki said. “They are away from their wives. And they have brought young boys to Libya who are there for the sole purpose of being sexually used by them. They call them al-firakh [baby birds]. The practice is completely accepted among the SNA, and the young boys don’t know any better.”

In March 2020, a report by human rights organization Syrians for Truth and Justice alleged that Turkey recruited child soldiers to send them to Libya. Maaliki bristles at its mention. “Each SNA faction that sent men Libya had a quota of fighters to fill. So naturally, child soldiers ended up among the militants in Libya,” he said.

“It is not that Turkey recruited the children for Libya. It is that for years, there have been child soldiers in the SNA and the FSA. This issue existed long before Turkey sent the first Syrian to Libya, and it will exist long after the last Syrian leaves Libya,” Maaliki said. “Do the Syrian children who are fighting only matter when they leave Syria? Because it should be clear that when Turkey sent SNA to Azerbaijan [to support Azerbaijani forces in their attack on Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2020], there were children among them, as well.”

Fajr Maaliki doesn’t have high hopes for the future of Syria or its youth. “Our revolution is dead. The Syrian National Army are just mercenaries for Turkey. Erdogan has sent us to Libya, to Azerbaijan. There are many rumors about where the SNA will be sent next. The young generation, those who were babies when the war started, are illiterate, uneducated, and naive. I think they will remain slaves to Turkey.” 

Opinion: With Armenian captives at issue, conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh continues to rankle

Washington Post
March 30 2021
March 29, 2021 at 7:58 p.m. EDT

This column has been updated.


Despite a nudge from a senior State Department official, Azerbaijan has so far refused to return more than four dozen Armenian prisoners who were captured after a bloody war for control of the disputed enclave known as Nagorno-Karabakh.

The prisoner issue is a bitter legacy of the battle last fall in which Azerbaijan’s forces, backed by Turkish-made drones, regained control of much of the mountainous region that is officially part of Azerbaijan but had been governed by its majority-Armenian population since a 1994 war for independence. Armenia says it lost more than 4,000 soldiers — a huge number for the small, embattled nation.

Russia brokered a peace deal last November and dispatched peacekeeping troops, reinforcing its dominance in the Caucasus region. But aftershocks of the conflict continue to reverberate, especially in Armenia, where Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan — whose government was rocked by the military defeat — faces parliamentary elections in June.

U.S. officials say that 52 Armenians are still held by Azerbaijan, despite earlier exchanges of prisoners. (An Armenian official said his government estimates that the number of captives is much higher, around 200.) The government in Baku claims that these detainees were not combatants in the war but entered the disputed territory in late November after the cease-fire and are terrorism suspects, an allegation that Armenia denies.

Philip Reeker, acting assistant secretary of state for Europe, raised the issue of the captives with Azerbaijan’s foreign minister, Jeyhun Bayramov, during a telephone call in February and requested that the International Committee of the Red Cross be allowed to visit the prisoners. The ICRC was promptly granted access.

U.S. officials continued in the following weeks to advocate the release of detainees. “We hope to see more detainees released,” said a senior Biden administration official. “We’re not negotiating, but we’re urging them to exercise goodwill,” he said, noting that implementing the cease-fire and prisoner swaps was Russia’s responsibility, as mediator between the combatants.

Observers had hoped that Azerbaijan might release the Armenian captives as a goodwill gesture at the time of the Nowruz holiday on March 20. Azerbaijan’s president, Ilham Aliyev, granted amnesty for 148 captives, including journalists, opposition politicians and human rights activists. But the Armenian detainees remained in custody.

“The Azerbaijanis have been pressing their false narrative that these people are not POWs but criminals because they were captured after the war,” Varuzhan Nersesyan, Armenia’s ambassador to Washington, said during an interview. Nersesyan said that since the war ended Nov. 10, “there has been no real attempt at normalization or reconciliation” by Azerbaijan. For that reason, he argued, the three co-chairs on the Minsk Group that oversees diplomacy on Nagorno-Karabakh, — the United States, France and Russia — should all remain involved.

Members of Congress have begun to press Azerbaijan on the issue. A group led by Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, introduced a bill March 16 calling on Azerbaijan to immediately release all Armenian POWs and captured civilians. The measure has 42 co-sponsors in the House.

“It is unacceptable that more than 100 days after the end of the war in Nagorno-Karabakh . . . Armenian service members and civilians remain in Azerbaijani custody, where little is known of their condition, treatment, or well-being,” Schiff said in a statement when the bill was introduced.

Human Rights Watch issued a report on March 19 alleging that Azerbaijani forces had abused Armenian POWs after the war, based on interviews with four former prisoners. Nersesyan, the Armenian ambassador, argued that Azerbaijani forces have also been destroying or damaging churches and religious artifacts in areas they captured during the war.

Elin Suleymanov, Azerbaijan’s ambassador to Washington, said during an interview Monday that Azerbaijan rejected the Human Rights Watch findings but that any serious allegations of prisoner mistreatment would be investigated. He also disputed accounts of damage to Armenian religious sites and cited counterclaims of past damage to Azeri mosques. “There is a lot of pain on both sides, and we need to acknowledge that,” he said.

The prisoner issue will gain additional emotional significance in April, the month when Armenians annually commemorate the mass killings that took place in 1915. Ian Bremmer, a prominent international commentator, tweeted recently that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan “will be incensed by the Biden administration’s move to acknowledge the Armenian genocide.”

An administration official queried Monday responded: “As a presidential candidate, President Biden commemorated the 1.5 million Armenian men, women, and children who lost their lives in the final years of the Ottoman Empire. He said then that we must never forget or remain silent about this horrific campaign. We will forever respect the perseverance of the Armenian people in the wake of such a great tragedy.”

Another administration official said a final decision about formal presidential recognition of the massacre hasn’t been made yet. This year’s commemoration will be especially poignant because of Armenia’s defeat in the Nagorno-Karabakh war last year, and the anguish that followed.

Read more:

While Armenia and Azerbaijan fought over Nagorno-Karabakh, their citizens battled on social media

The fighting in Nagorno-Karabakh is about local territories and wider rivalries

: How to stop a war between Armenia and Azerbaijan

: What’s needed for a first step toward peace for Armenia and Azerbaijan

writes a twice-a-week foreign affairs column for The Washington Post. His latest novel is “The Paladin.” 

Armenian media under attack or undergoing long-needed reforms?

JAM News
April 1 2021
    Gegham Vardanyan, Yerevan

Armenian media riled by new bill

A recent media bill put forward by the Armenian government is purportedly aimed at combating disinformation, but the opposition says it can be regarded as an attempt to restrict freedom of _expression_.

During a rally on February 25, 2021, Armenian PM Nikol Pashinyan, together with like-minded people gathered on the Republic Square, chanted “down with velvet!”, with ‘velvet’ symbolising the policy of ‘love and tolerance’ announced in Armenia by the new authorities after the 2018 revolution.

‘Velvet’ was then equated with the refusal to use repression in any sphere. But after the defeat by Azerbaijan in the 2020 war, Pashinyan and his team declare ‘an end to velvet.’

This _expression_ fully corresponds to the attitude of the ruling political force towards the media. Why?

Back in 2018, Nikol Pashinyan, during a discussion of the government’s programme, said that 90% of media outlets belong to the former authorities, and this estimate has not changed over the past two years.


  • Are PM-announced snap elections in Armenia in violation of constitution?
  • IRI poll reveals Armenian gov’t still enjoys considerable support

The government and Pashinyan’s political team in parliament have initiated a veritable ‘parade’ of legislative changes affecting the work of journalists and media.

The latest example is a bill raised proposed by Vice-Speaker of the National Assembly Alen Simonyan “On Amendments to the Civil Code of Armenia”. It assumes a threefold increase in monetary compensation for insult and slander, which will amount to 3 and 6 million drams, respectively ($5670 and $11340).

Alen Simonyan himself, during the discussion of the law in the National Assembly, also made a mention of ‘an end to the velvet attitude…[which] is now unacceptable…freedom of speech should not be confused with rudeness and paid slander…Any resource that is engaged in rudeness or slander is criminal.”

Human rights organization Freedom House has responded to this initiative.

“It is a shame that the Armenian government encourages fines that can restrict freedom of _expression_ and threaten the financial viability of media resources in the country,” the organization said in a March 26 statement.

More than 10 journalistic organizations in Armenia also responded to this initiative of the authorities. Their joint statement said:

“These changes will cause significant damage to freedom of speech and _expression_, the ability of media resources for objective criticism will be limited. In addition, it can be a signal for the courts and spur them to take more stringent decisions against media outlets.”

MPs did not accept criticism of the bill from journalists and experts. But it is no coincidence that the statement raises the question of the courts. The annual report of the Committee to Protect Freedom of _expression_ states that 74 media cases were considered in courts during the year. Most of them, or rather 61, were instituted on the basis of insult and slander.

The media community appealed to the president of Armenia with an appeal not to sign the law and send it to the Constitutional Court to determine its compliance with law.

The poster reads: “Long live the revolution of love and solidarity.” Photo from ArmDaily.am website

Reactions from journalists

Over the past year, media organizations in Armenia have had many reasons to address statements to the authorities.

In just a year, there were almost such 30 statements, six of them related specifically to the legislative changes; there was also an appeal due to restrictions on the work of the press during the coronavirus epidemic.

Moreover, the topic of insults and slander is not limited to this change, which has almost come into force.

The prosecutor’s office has posted on the website edraft.am, which was created to discuss bills in society, another initiative, which provides for the criminal prosecution of insulting or defamatory officials of state and local bodies.

The prosecutor’s office offers for public insult or slander of a civil servant in the media or, for example, on social media, a punishment in the form of a fine in the amount of 500,000 to 3 million drams ($1000-5670) or imprisonment up to two years.

Armenian journalistic organizations reacted harshly to this initiative, stating that this bill is “a logical continuation of a number of legislative initiatives of the authorities over the past few months which try to restrict freedom of speech and media activities.”

Another initiative to establish new rules on the media field was proposed by MPs from the ruling My Step faction. This bill is better known in Armenia as “the law against anonymous sources”.

It provides for a ban on the use of anonymous sources; violators face a fine of 500,000 drams (about $1,000 dollars). And in case of a repeated violation, the amount of the fine is doubled.

An “anonymous source” in the bill is described as “a domain registered on the Internet, a hosted site, or a profile on an Internet site or application, the identity of the owner of which is hidden from readers.” One of the authors of the bill, MP Vahagn Hovakimyan, explains that by ‘anonymous sources we mean fakes”.

And by ‘fakes’ the representatives of the ruling force mean, first of all, Telegram channels, the authors of which are unknown.

In the post-war period, the Armenian media really has a mechanism by which information published in anonymous Telegram channels is disseminated in the press. However, they are not always false.

Sometimes there are blatant misinformation attempts, sometimes it’s only the half-truth, and sometimes it’s reality. The problem is that news sites don’t waste time checking the details of Telegram channels before publishing.

The authors of the bill explain that they intend to ban not the use of anonymous sources, but “advertising” of anonymous Telegram channels. Journalists can use information from these channels without specifying the source – as if it were their own information and media content.

This initiative also received criticism from the journalistic circles of Armenia. The human rights defender discussed the draft law with media experts and said that it offers “episodic” solutions that could cause serious problems in the field of journalism in the future.”

The appeals, demands and statements of journalists and human rights organizations have not yet influenced Pashinyan’s team. The bills have been put into circulation and step by step are approaching the moment of approval.

Armenia is still in shock after losing the war. People are disenchanted with state propaganda during the war. Official announcements, media publications do not inspire confidence.

This is proved by a study by the International Republican Institute (IRI), published in March this year, according to which 50% of the residents of Armenia do not trust any media at all.

The ruling political force does not have enough media resources for the internal political struggle, and it intends to fight for those who have not yet decided in news sources.

The new legislative initiatives are an attempt by Pashinyan’s team to establish new rules for the work of journalists and the information field. These rules may also be aimed at combating disinformation, but can be seen as attempts to restrict freedom of _expression_.

President Sarkissian, Speaker of Parliament and top brass visit Yerablur cemetery to honor fallen troops

Save

Share

 10:39, 2 April, 2021

YEREVAN, APRIL 2, ARMENPRESS. President Armen Sarkissian, Speaker of Parliament Ararat Mirzoyan, Defense Minister Vagharshak Harutyunyan, the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces Lt. General Artak Davtyan and other high ranking officials visited the Yerablur military cemetery on April 2 to pay tribute to the 2016 April War victims, as well as the 2020 Nagorno Karabakh war victims.

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan sent flowers and a wreath to the cemetery. He was unable to personally visit Yerablur because he is in self-isolation.

“Today we mourn and are proud of our brave soldiers, who fell for our country on the line of duty during the 2016 Four Day war and the latest 44-day war. If we hadn’t learnt lessons from the April War, the latest 44-day war would’ve had a different outcome. We could’ve lost Artsakh entirely,” said Lt. General Davtyan.

Photos by Gevorg Perkuperkyan

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Chiefs of General Staffs of Armenian, Russian Armed Forces discuss military-technical cooperation

Save

Share

 19:17, 1 April, 2021

YEREVAN, APRIL 1, ARMENPRESS. Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Armenia Artak Davtyan held a telephone conversation with his Russian counterpart Valery Gerasimov, ARMENPRESS was informed from the official website of the Russian Defense Ministry.

The sides discussed issues referring to ensuring regional security and peace, as well as the current stage and future opportunities of military and military-technical cooperation between the two countries.