Armenian Ambassador Meets Dutch Minister Of Development Cooperation

ARMENIAN AMBASSADOR MEETS DUTCH MINISTER OF DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION

armradio.am
13.01.2010 18:04

Armenian Ambassador to Belgium and the Netherlands Avet Adonts
had a meeting with the Minister of Development Cooperation of the
Netherlands, Albert Koenders.

During the meeting the Minister referred to the reforms implemented
in the EU structures, underlining the urgency of modernization of
the relations between the European Union and its partner countries.

Minister Koenders emphasized the active cooperation between the
Netherlands and Armenia in the implementation of the World Bank and
IMF programs. He proposed to reconsider the existing resources and
program implementation tools to ensure greater efficiency.

At the request of the Dutch Minister, Ambassador Adonts presented
Armenia’s economic policy and the government programs targeted at
the stabilization of economy.

Defense Ministers Of Armenia And Russia Discuss Issues Of Regional S

DEFENSE MINISTERS OF ARMENIA AND RUSSIA DISCUSS ISSUES OF REGIONAL SECURITY

PanARMENIAN.Net
13.01.2010 18:44 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ On January 13, a working meeting was held between the
RA Defense Minister Seyran Ohanyan, currently on a visit to Moscow,
and the Russian Minister of Defense Anatoly Serdyukov. During the
meeting the sides discussed prospects of developing military and
military-technical cooperation between Russia and Armenia, as well
as issues of regional security. The issue of preparation of Armenian
soldiers in the universities of the RF Defense Ministry was also
discussed.

As Anatoly Serdyukov said, "Armenia-Russian relations in the military
sphere are of a strategic nature," press office of RA Ministry of
Defense reported.

Yerevan District Electoral Commission No. 10 Recounts Votes

YEREVAN DISTRICT ELECTORAL COMMISSION NO. 10 RECOUNTS VOTES

PanARMENIAN.Net
13.01.2010 19:48 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Considering the 11 appeals submitted by Ara
Simonyan (National Unity) and Editor-in-Chief of Haykakan Zhamanak
Nikol Pashinyan (currently under arrest), Yerevan District electoral
commission No. 10 started Tuesday vote recounting procedures in 3
polling stations.

Thus, after a vote recount in polling stations 10/7, 10/14 and 10/30,
the number of valid voting ballots increased by 5 and number of
inaccuracies – by 12. The votes cast in favor of candidates David
Hakobyan and Nikol Pashinyan increased by 1 and 5 respectively.

According to CEC preliminary reports, a winning candidate in January
10 elections is Ara Simonyan who received 7622 votes.

The other candidates – David Hakobyan (Marxist Party) and Nikol
Pashinyan – received 299 and 5023 votes respectively.

BAKU: Turkey’s PM Called On Russia To Play A Greater Role In Resolvi

TURKEY’S PM CALLED ON RUSSIA TO PLAY A GREATER ROLE IN RESOLVING THE NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT

Trend
Jan 13 2010
Azerbaijan

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan during the talks with
his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin on Wednesday expressed the
hope that Russia played a more active role in resolving the problem
of Nagorno-Karabakh, TRT Russian reported.

In turn, Putin expressed readiness to provide full support in this
matter.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
armed forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan since 1992,
including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and 7 surrounding districts.

Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group – Russia, France, and the U.S. –
are currently holding the peace negotiations.

Turkey’s PM Hopes Israel To Be In Favor Of Peace

TURKEY’S PM HOPES ISRAEL TO BE IN FAVOR OF PEACE

PanARMENIAN.Net
14.01.2010 13:14 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said
that they expected Israel to be more fair in the region and to be in
favor of peace.

After his arrival from Moscow, Prime Minister Erdogan told reporters
at the airport that, at this point, it was Israel which should
array itself.

"Israel should be more fair and should be in favor of peace in the
region," he said.

Prime Minister Erdogan said that Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak,
who is also the leader of one of the political parties forming the
current coalition government, would pay a visit to Turkey to hold
talks with Turkish national defense and foreign ministers, AA reported.

Grandchild Of ‘Crimson Sultan’ Goes To Court For Mosul Oil

GRANDCHILD OF ‘CRIMSON SULTAN’ GOES TO COURT FOR MOSUL OIL

Hurriyet
Jan 10 2010
Turkey

Beyzade Bulent Osman, grandson of Ottoman Sultan Abdulhamit II,
is preparing to go to court to claim the rich oil reserves of Mosul.

Osman, who calls himself an Ottoman of French origin, also has
thoughts on the association of his grandfather with the Armenian issue:
‘I am on the side of the truth, but we need to look to the future now’

‘Mosul’s oil [reserves] were not purchased by the money of the
state but with money Abdulhamit owned personally.’ DAILY NEWS photo,
Hasan ALTINIÅ~^IK

Beyzade Bulent Osman, grandson of Ottoman Sultan Abdulhamit II,
known as the "Crimson Sultan," is preparing to go to court to claim
oil reserves around the city of Mosul in northern Iraq.

Osman is the son of Abdulhamit II’s youngest daughter, Naime Sultan,
who spent the last years of her life in exile after the fall of the
Ottoman Empire. Osman spoke to the Hurriyet Daily News & Economic
Review at his modest house in the TeÅ~_vikiye neighborhood of Istanbul.

"My mother lived her last days dealing with financial problems, as
many of our family members did since everything that belonged to my
grandfather was confiscated, including his personal items," Osman said.

Osman’s father had been exploring legal avenues to claim the rights
to the Mosul oil reserves until his death, yet those efforts had been
fruitless, he said. "Mosul’s oil [reserves] were not purchased by
the money of the state but with money Abdulhamit owned personally,"
Osman said.

He criticized Britain’s stance on the issue. "My family was promised
by Britain during World War I that the income would be shared.

Unfortunately, this promise was not kept," he said. "I have been in
contact with top officials in Ankara about the matter and the legal
process will be started as soon as possible."

Osman recounted the story of his grandfather’s purchase of Mosul’s
oil reserves based on the details he heard from his grandmother.

"Abdulhamit II noticed the British were paying frequent visits to
Iraq and consulted palace bureaucrats on the issue," he said. "The
civil servants told him to see Kalust Gulbenkian, a member of the
Ottoman-Armenian community who was studying at Galatasaray High
School. He later made an international name for himself as an oil
tradesman."

According to Osman, Abdulhamit summoned Gulbenkian, who told the
sultan that Britain was using Iraq’s oil to power their cars. "My
grandfather happened to be the owner of the oil reserves of Mosul
thanks to Gulbenkian," he said.

The Armenian issue and the Crimson Sultan

The world knows Sultan Abdulhamit II as a key name related to
the Armenian issue and the events of 1915, recognized as genocide
by many countries, a claim Turkey rejects. "I am on the side of
truth," Osman said on the issue. "The French and the Germans had
also slaughtered each other, came into conflict but still managed to
establish dialogue. We have to leave history behind us and look ahead."

Osman also said his family "owed their lives" to French-Armenians
after their exile from Turkey. "We were penniless," he told the Daily
News. "Our Armenian friends helped us. There was an Armenian lady
who welcomed us to her chateau and we lived there for a long time. I
cannot deny the good deeds Armenians have done for my family."

The Ottoman dynasty was ordered into exile with a law passed by the
Turkish Parliament on March 3, 1924. While their assets were seized,
the members of the imperial family were given 2,000 pounds sterling
each and special "one-way passports" that could not be used to enter
the country again. The first to go into exile was the last caliph,
Abdulmecid, while the last to leave was Fatma Sultan, daughter of
Sultan Murad V.

Born in France, Osman is now 80 years old. He said he witnessed his
grandmother crying many times when he was a child. Only learning
Turkish later in life, he said: "My grandmother and mother wanted
us to learn Turkish. They thought Mustafa Kemal Ataturk would be
unsuccessful in his cause and that we would return to the old days. My
father, however, was a republican by all means and was supportive of
Ataturk’s principles."

All suffering from financial problems, exiled members of the Ottoman
dynasty dispersed to the world’s major cities, including Paris, London
and New York. Only in 1952, under then-Prime Minister Adnan Menderes,
were some members allowed to return to Turkey, he said.

"That law opened the path for women to return to Turkey and become
citizens once more. Men, on the other hand, were only able to win
this right in 1974 through a general amnesty granted by the late
Prime Minister Bulent Ecevit," he said.

Heir as a Michelin employee

Osman defines himself as "an Ottoman of French origin" and said Turkey
should "rehabilitate the reputation of the Ottoman dynasty."

He said his life had been hard but that changed after applying for
a job at Michelin. "During my time with Michelin, I worked in every
country that used to be a part of the Ottoman Empire," he said. "I
first visited Istanbul during the 1990s, shortly after my father’s
passing."

RA CC Members In Retiring Room To Take Decision On Protocols

RA CC MEMBERS IN RETIRING ROOM TO TAKE DECISION ON PROTOCOLS

PanARMENIAN.Net
12.01.2010 11:48 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Members of the Constitutional Court of the Republic
of Armenia were handed ARF Dashnaktsutyun’s juridical conclusion on
the Armenian-Turkish protocols, said Gagik Harutyunyan, CC chairman.

"The CC will follow procedure. The documents are presently in the
retiring room and the decision will announced," he said, adding that
all documents regarding the protocols will be taken into consideration.

As a PanARMENIAN.Net correspondent reported from the scene, the CC
members are presently in the retiring room to reach a verdict. It’s
not known yet how long the discussion will last.

The protocols aimed at normalization of bilateral ties and opening of
the common border between Armenia and Turkey were signed in Zurich
by Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian and his Turkish
counterpart Ahmet Davutoglu on October 10, 2009, after a series of
diplomatic talks held through Swiss mediation.

The Armenian Revolutionary Federation Dashnaktsutyun is an Armenian
political party founded in Tiflis (Tbilisi, the capital of Georgia)
in 1890 by Christapor Mikaelian, Stepan Zorian, and Simon Zavarian
The ARF has the largest number of members from the political parties
present in the Armenian Diaspora, having established affiliates in
more than 200 countries.

The ARF Dashnaktsutyun led the effort toward the establishment of
the first Armenian Republic in 1918 and was the party in power for
the duration of its existence. Following the Sovietization of Armenia
in 1920, the ARF-Dashnaktsutyun was banned by the Communists and its
leadership exiled.

In the Diaspora, the ARF Dashnaktsutyun fought Soviet rule over
Armenia and championed the cause of Armenian rights and independence;
it played a leading role in organizing a social and cultural framework
aimed at preserving the Armenian identity.

The ARF Dashnaktsutyun officially re-emerged in Armenia during the
dissolution of the USSR, in 1990.

On December 28, 1994, the activities of the ARF-Dashnaktsutyun were
"temporarily suspended" by the Armenian authorities. In view of
the political nature of the anti-ARF interdictions by the Armenian
authorities, the ARF continued to operate in Armenia. On February 9,
1998, less than a week after the resignation of the then president
Ter-Petrossian, the Justice Ministry lifted the ban on the ARF
Dashnaktsutyun.

Special Court On Armenian Genocide Issues To Be Established In Franc

SPECIAL COURT ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ISSUES TO BE ESTABLISHED IN FRANCE

Noyan Tapan
Jan 11, 2010

PARIS, JANUARY 11, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. A special judicial
structure on Armenian Genocide issues will be established in France to
attend to the issue of Armenian Genocide and crimes committed against
mankind. The Foreign and Justice Ministers of France reported this
in their joint article published in the Le Monde French newspaper,
Marmara reported. The issue of establishing the judicial structure will
be placed on French parliament’s agenda in the first three months of
2010. The Ministers stressed that the authors of the Genocide or those
committing a crime against mankind should be condemned and punished
without fail.

BAKU: Armenian clerical leader expected at Baku summit

AzerNews Weekly, Azerbaijan
Jan 6 2010

Armenian clerical leader expected at Baku summit

06-01-2010 23:12:45

Armenian Catholicos Garegin II is expected to visit Baku to attend a
meeting of world clerical leaders in April. The event has been
initiated by the Caucasus Muslims Office (CMO), Azerbaijan’s senior
clerical body, according to Rahima Dadashova, the CMO spokeswoman.
The two-day summit, which will be arranged jointly with the Russian
Orthodox Church, will be joined by clerics representing the Islamic,
Christian, Jewish and other traditional creeds.
Dadashova said the first such summit was held in Moscow in 2006 and
attended by up to 200 clerical leaders from 49 countries. The scope of
territory from which invitees arrive may be further expanded at the
event due in the Azerbaijani capital, she added.*

Why lobbies don’t matter

Ha’aretz, Israel
Dec 31 2009

Why lobbies don’t matter

By Yossi Shain and Neil Rogachevsky

The signing of a peace treaty between Armenia and Turkey in October
was a little-noticed milestone. Since the Ottomans deported and
murdered Armenians in World War I in what Armenians and much of the
world call the Armenian Genocide, Armenians have not been fond of
Turkey. For its part, Turkey has long disputed both the genocide and
the Armenian presence in Nagorno-Karabakh, an enclave in Azerbaijan, a
close Turkish ally. Though signed pledges do not guarantee peace, the
U.S.-brokered pledges to reestablish ties and open borders could well
prove to be the beginning of the end of this intractable conflict.

The pledges were made in the face of some resistance in both
countries, but particularly among the Armenian diaspora and its
leaders. The so-called "Armenian lobby," which was thought in the
1990s to determine both U.S. and Armenian government policy in the
Caspian Sea, staunchly opposed the deal and mobilized the community
against it. In Los Angeles the week before the signing, Armenian
President Serzh Sargsyan was confronted by around 12,000 protesters.
One prominent Armenian-American declared the agreement "the latest
entry in the ledger of crimes committed, and covered up, against the
Armenian nation." Nevertheless, opposition from the Armenian Diaspora
did not stop Turkey and Armenia from coming to terms.

The Armenian lobby’s failure to block the treaty is instructive when
one considers that other mythically powerful diaspora group known as
the "Israel lobby." The Israel lobby has long been thought to exert
vast influence on U.S. policy in the Middle East. In the extreme
version of this view, it is only the foot-dragging of hawkish
pro-Israel groups like AIPAC that has stymied American efforts to
improve the prospects for peace in the Middle East.

Many believers in the power of lobbying have expressed hope that new
dynamics in the American Jewish community could shift U.S. policy in
the Middle East. Finally, there is a president who has pledged a more
"evenhanded" policy between Israelis and Palestinians, and the
American Jewish community remains firmly in his camp. Furthermore, a
new dovish Israel lobby called J Street, which held its inaugural
conference in November to great fanfare, was formed with the explicit
task of supporting U.S. President Barack Obama’s Middle East policy –
or in the words of J Street founder Jeremy Ben-Ami, "to be the
president’s blocking back."

In short, if ever there were a time in which America could "change
course" in the Middle East, it would seem to be now. Obama, supported
by J Street and the American Jewish community at large, can lean on
Israel with no domestic political cost, so American policy in the
Middle East can finally become more rational and effective.

But so far, there has not been much progress. A year into Obama’s
term, the situation in the Middle East – particularly on the
Israeli-Palestinian front – looks as intractable as before. The
parties remain as far from each other as ever on the so-called "core
issues" such as the future of Jerusalem and the Palestinian right of
return. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas of the Fatah
faction has said he will not run for a new term. Without him, Fatah’s
control over the West Bank, tenuous at the best of times, could become
still weaker.

Over in Gaza, Hamas is deepening its control and does not seem to be
moderating its position with the necessities of governing, as some
experts had hoped. Meanwhile, Israel’s settlements in the West Bank,
thought by some to be an obstacle to peace, continue their "natural
growth." If there is progress on Israel-Palestine any time soon, it
doesn’t seem that it will come by way of U.S. diplomacy.

Both the successful signing of an Armenian-Turkish accord and the
inability of Israelis and Palestinians to achieve one indicates that
the power of lobbies to influence events, and even U.S. policy, has
been highly exaggerated. The Armenian diaspora could not stop the
Armenian government from concluding a deal. Despite its alleged power
on Capitol Hill, the Armenian lobby could not dent American enthusiasm
for blessing this new opening in the Caucasus. Earlier, it had been
thought that the Armenian lobby was hindering an accord. But it turns
out the moment for such an accord was just not right. Now, with
Turkey’s serious push for European Union membership and Armenia’s
desire to benefit from the end of the Turkish blockade, conditions
have become favorable for a deal.

Similarly, the Obama administration faces no politically relevant
opposition from American Jews on its Middle East policy. But no
progress has been made, despite this administration’s new orientation,
because the sides aren’t ready. The situation, to use the old phrase,
is not ripe. Ignorance of those conditions could lead one to believe
that a little bit of lobbying can make all the difference – and to a
vast over-estimation of the power of ethnic lobbying over U.S. policy.
But, happily or unhappily, reality has other ideas.

With all the attention on lobbying, shuttle diplomacy and the like,
genuine small achievements in Israel-Palestine have gone unnoticed.
Checkpoints have been removed in the West Bank, the Palestinian
economy in the West Bank has grown steadily, and robust civil society,
slowly but surely, continues to grow in the West Bank. These
encouraging signs may one day make the situation ripe for agreement.
Should that materialize, let’s not allow any lobbying organizations to
take much credit for it.

Prof. Yossi Shain heads Tel Aviv University’s Hartog School of
Government. Neil Rogachevsky is a doctoral student at Georgetown
University. The two are writing a book on American foreign policy and
the myth of the Jewish lobby.

5.html

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/113892