Bird flu outbreack in Turkey

Bird flu outbreack in Turkey

ArmRadio.am
09.02.2007 14:30

Turkish officials have confirmed that there has been an outbreak of
avian influenza in the country’s south-east.

Turkey’s agriculture ministry said at least 170 chickens had died in
a village in the province of Batman.

The ministry said it was checking if the bird deaths were caused by
the H5N1 strain of avian influenza. It is believed wild birds spread
the disease.

The country culled more than 1.3 million birds last year in an effort
to control the spread of the virus.

"Strict quarantine measures have been taken in an area of 10km
(6.2 miles) around the village where the disease was identified,"
the ministry said in a statement.

Turkey saw the first human deaths from H5N1 outside Asia, in January
2006, when 12 people were infected, four of whom later died.

More than 80 people have died of H5N1 bird flu since the disease’s
resurgence in December 2003 – most of them in South-East Asia.

RA Budgetary Expenditures Grow By 14.9% In 2006

RA BUDGETARY EXPENDITURES GROW BY 14.9% IN 2006

Noyan Tapan
Feb 08 2007

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 8, NOYAN TAPAN. In 2006, expenditures of more than
454.1 bln drams (about 1 bln 91 mln 482 thusand USD) were made at
the expense of RA state budgetary resources, which secured a 98.2%
execution of the annual program. According to the RA Ministry of
Finance and Economy, 76.8% of allocated resources was used for current
expenditures financing, 19.7% – for capital expenditures financing and
3.5% – for net crediting. Budgetary expenditures grew by 14.9% or over
58.9 bln drams in 2006 on 2005. This growth was mainly conditioned by
an increase in capital expenditures, purchase of services, transfers
and salaries. Current expenditures made up the largest part of the
overall expenditures: over 348.9 bln drams was allocated for their
financing in 2006, which ensured the annual program’s execution
by 98.5%. Cuurent expenditures grew by 12.5% or 38.8 bln drams on
the previous year. 11.5% of current expenditures was made to pay
salaries of state institutions’ employees of the total amount of
40.2 bln drams. The annual program of the government was executed by
99.1%. Allocations for salaries grew by 20.9% on the previous year,
which was mainly conditioned by the increase of civil servants’
salaries since January 1, 2006.

Border Demarcation Between Armenia And Georgia Under Way

BORDER DEMARCATION BETWEEN ARMENIA AND GEORGIA UNDER WAY

ArmRadio.am
08.02.2007 13:50

The next meeting of the working group on demarcation of the
Armenian-Georgian border will be held in Tbilisi. RA Foreign Minister
Vartan Oskanian told Armenpress that both sides are interested in
the rapid completion of the demarcation works.

Last time border demarcation between Armenia and Georgia was held
February18 and September 2, 1929 with partial modifications on March
19, 1935.

Thereafter the border underwent partial modifications in 1938, 1945,
1958 and 1963.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union the border demarcation works
between Armenia and Georgia started in 1995. A commission was created,
which works up until now.

Armenia Can Hamper Kars-Akhalkalaki-Tbilisi-Baku Project Implementat

ARMENIA CAN HAMPER KARS-AKHALKALAKI-TBILISI-BAKU PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

PanARMENIAN.Net
07.02.2007 16:29 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Kars-Akhalkalaki-Tbilisi-Baku railroad
project is economically ungrounded and targeted at deepening of
Armenia’s blockade, vice-speaker of the Armenian National Assembly
Vahan Hovhannissian told reporters today. "This is a mere political
project. Turkey hopes that with exploitation of the railway will
alleviate pressure as regards opening of the Armenian-Turkish
border. However, it’s an erroneous calculation, since we clearly
understand that the project has nothing in common with economy and
communications," he said adding that Armenia is capable to hamper its
implementation. "If we succeed in fining correct diplomatic solutions
the implementation may at least be protracted," the vice-speaker said.

"The project is hard to implement. Some sectors should lie though
out-of-the-way places. Furthermore, it will be hard settle the
financial issues, especially after the U.S. ban," he said. "Armenia
should work for a similar decision by the European Union. The
whole Armenian diplomatic system should work in this direction,"
the vice-speaker underscored, reports newsarmenia.ru.

Armenian CB Board Permitted "Converse Bank" To Establish A UTS Trans

ARMENIAN CB BOARD PERMITTED "CONVERSE BANK" TO ESTABLISH A UTS TRANSFER SYSTEM

Mediamax agency, Armenia
via Banks.am
Feb 7 2007

Yerevan, February 8 /Mediamax/. The Board of the Central Bank of
Armenia gave "Converse Bank" a permission to establish and realize
the activities of the Armenian payment and account system "United
Transfer System" (UTS).

As Mediamax was told in the CB press service, the decision was made
February 6, during the session of the CB Board.

The CB Board also made changes and amendments in the document
"On minimal conditions of realizing inner control in the banks",
"Regulation of bank activities, the basic economic norms of banking
activities" and "Code of rules on regulating the market of securities".

Lost In Translation? It’s The L.A. Way

LOST IN TRANSLATION? IT’S THE L.A. WAY

UCLA International Institute, CA
Feb 7 2007

Three students, under the aegis of the Center for World Languages,
part of the International Institute, launched a monthly online journal
Feb. 1 that celebrates L.A. and its astonishing linguistic diversity.

I still have ties to my heritage, but I also feel like L.A. is my
town.This article was first published in UCLA Today.

With more than 54% of Angelenos speaking a language other than English
at home, Los Angeles is a modern-day Babel, where a profusion of more
than 100 languages flows fluidly across neighborhood boundaries and
zip codes.

In Chinatown, you see signs in Spanish as well as English and
Vietnamese. In Glendale, the din of public conversation can turn
instantly from English to Armenian. In Long Beach, you might be
surprised to hear … Dutch?

In this multilingual metropolis, immigrant families strive to
simultaneously communicate in an English-dominant society and still
retain the language of their homeland. It’s a city where biracial
marriages prove challenging to communication between offspring and
their grandparents.

To tell these stories, three students, under the aegis of the Center
for World Languages, part of the International Institute, launched a
monthly online journal Feb. 1 that celebrates L.A. and its astonishing
linguistic diversity.

In "LA Language World: a Global City Speaks," readers meet a couple
who came to Los Angeles from Armenia six years ago. While they can
barely speak English, their 4-year-old daughter prefers it, to their
dismay. Her sentences are in English, with only a sprinkling of
Armenian words.

"Her parents cannot understand why this has happened," said Margarita
Hirapetian, a fourth-year English major who speaks Armenian and
Russian and wrote about the family’s linguistic struggle.

In "Love’s Labors Considered," UCLA alumna Julia Robinson Shimizu
writes about her and her son’s struggle to speak Japanese, the
native language of her husband, Ichiro. "As a family, we have done
our best to communicate in Japanese – to respect Ichiro’s language
and culture and to align with the bicultural compass of our lives,"
Shimizu writes. "When our small family sits down to dinner, and our
son relates an adventure or opinion in his halting Japanese, I often
nod or disagree and interject my own opinions while Ichiro sits back
and scratches his head, utterly unable to understand our truncated
Japanese jibberish."

"Every story we write has two elements in common – Los Angeles and
language," said Kevin Matthews, senior writer for the International
Institute and the journal’s editor, who came up with an idea
for a linguistic journal last October. Then Susan Bauckus, staff
researcher for the Center for World Languages, suggested: Why not
look at language – the way people learn it and use it – from a human
interest perspective?

To unearth these stories, the three students, who learned to
speak their parents’ native language while growing up at home, came
forward without promise of class credit, only a desire to reveal this
oft-overlooked aspect of L.A.

"I still have ties to my heritage, but I also feel like L.A. is my
town," said Hirapetian. "I want to tell these stories about all the
different people and cultures that are here" because of "what has
happened to me personally."

Stephanie Tavitian, a third-year international development studies
major, was raised by an Arab-Armenian father and Salvadoran mother.

While she speaks fluent Spanish, she has experience in and out of
the classroom with Armenian, Arabic and Japanese.

Tavitian sat in on a class at El Sereno Middle School in East Los
Angeles to watch a teacher help students who speak Chicano-English
learn standard English.

Her story opens a window on LAUSD’s Academic English Mastery
Program that helps youngsters who speak non-standard English succeed
academically without demeaning their language.

Senior April Girouard, who grew up learning French and Dutch, takes
a look at a linguistics mystery: Why do Hollywood celebs give their
offspring such other-worldy monikers as Moxie Crime Fighter and
Audio Science?

Bill Gates’ Keynote Address To The Government Leaders Forum Europe 2

BILL GATES’ KEYNOTE ADDRESS TO THE GOVERNMENT LEADERS FORUM EUROPE 2007

eGov monitor, UK
Feb 5 2007

In his keynote address to GLF Europe 2007, Bill Gates talks about
how technology is revolutionising the way children are being taught
in schools, from new forms of interactivity to software that can
empower people.

Well, good morning. It’s very fitting that we’re here in Scotland,
and we’re certainly appreciative of the incredible hospitality that
we’ve had here. But I think it’s appropriate in many different ways.

Of course, we have the example of Carnegie, who was not just a great
philanthropist, but also believed in education and empowerment. His
example of funding libraries has been a great example for Microsoft
and my foundation as we’ve gone out to libraries around the world
and gone from just having books to now having PCs that connect up to
the Internet.

Carnegie was also incredible in terms of reforming education, both
graduate education and undergraduate education, and realizing that
it wasn’t just quantity, it was also quality.

Perhaps Carnegie is most famous for a rule of challenge for me,
which is that he who dies rich dies disgraced. And so I’m working on
avoiding that. (Laughter.) But it’s a high responsibility.

Also from Scotland, of course, we have Adam Smith, and even though
he’s best known for his pronouncements about the benefits of trade and
capitalism, he was also a great philosopher talking about philanthropy
and caring for your fellow man.

In fact, just last year in June, when my good friend Warren Buffett
made a commitment of most of his fortune to the foundation that my
wife and I run, a rather unbelievable gift, actually the biggest ever
in the world, I gave him a first edition of Adam Smith’s book that
talked about our responsibility for caring for your fellow man. So
he was a great thinker thinking ahead in many, many different ways.

Certainly the things going on here in Scotland today really fit the
themes of our conference. I had a chance yesterday afternoon to go
and tour the University of Edinburgh, and see some of the things
they’re doing in what they call regenerative medicine. That’s taking
stem cell technology and using it in new ways to cure some of the
toughest diseases. And the way they’re going about it, the level of
investment, using the new tools, also working in close cooperation
with small startup businesses or existing businesses to draw their
skills in, I think it’s a great paradigm for how advances really will
take place. And so there’s a lot of great reasons that we’re here.

I’m also very honored to share the podium with Chancellor Brown. He
and I have had a chance to partner and work on a lot or things,
because we have a lot of beliefs in common. In fact, everything the
Chancellor said about education really I want to second that. It is
the key investment that governments make, it is the key thing that
determines the future, and there’s a lot of reasons we ought to be
optimistic about that.

Gordon and I were recently down at the World Economic Forum
working on issues of government involvement in these global health
activities. And certainly the last several years have been fantastic
because of partnerships like the ones that we’ve had together, people
like Bono coming in. We’ve managed to really not just tell the sad
story of what’s not being done but also to get more resources and to
start to really make a difference. And that’s why the story of the
vaccine fund GAVI is a great one because governments have stepped up,
and it’s provable that that’s making a difference.

So, having people understand that aid done well can really work is
critical, because we want broad support for these things, and in many
countries that’s missing because of the cynicism about the image that
people have had of aid in the past.

And so there’s some exciting things that we are working on together,
and we both bring a huge level of optimism to what can be achieved.

Of course, this week is a big week for Microsoft. We’ve been working
many years on some new products that just got launched officially
yesterday, worldwide availability in 39,000 outlets and online of
what we call Windows Vista and Office 2007.

And I don’t want to focus on those, but they’re a great example of
the pace of innovation that creates new opportunities. Windows Vista
has a particular focus on things like safety so that parents can have
their kids go out on the Internet and they can feel comfortable about
that. The reason why is that you can determine what type of software
your kid runs, you can determine when they use the machine, you can
also go back and look at their activity log. Now, you have to decide
up to what age that’s appropriate for your kids, and every family
may have different policies, but I love the idea of being able to
see where my daughter has been going and have a chance to discuss
with her what sort of things she’s seen on the Internet, and make
sure that I’m always aware of those activities.

An advance in the operating system also lets us do revolutionary things
in terms of communications. And the impact of these communication
advances are quite fundamental. I mean, after all, the traditional
newspaper readership in rich countries is dropping quite rapidly, and
in some ways we could see that as a scary thing, because after all,
why are people informed voters, why do they understand the issues,
participate in the debates in an intelligent way? Well, historically
that’s the print media or media delivered on paper has been a key
part of that. Now, more and more that same media, and new media that
has emerged delivered in digital form is a key element.

And so the opportunity of people with a common interest to find each
other, the opportunity that even if you don’t own a printing press
that you can share your ideas, that is really changing the world.

And so every time the software moves forward, this idea of empowering
people to create new things is quite amazing.

And once upon a time, if you looked at a typeset document you could
say, oh, this must have come from a government or a big company.

Well, today, we don’t think that anymore, because anyone with a PC
can make a great looking document.

With Windows Vista now you have high-definition movie editing
capability, so your kids at night can make the same sort of special
effects and transitions that you would have thought that only a huge
Hollywood budget would allow to be possible in the past.

And so these kinds of releases move up that next level, and certainly
the young people are embracing these things in an incredible way.

Communications and collaboration is changing, and it’s changing for
the better. Distance matters a lot less than ever before. That’s a
statement that I’ve made in many speeches, but it was brought home
to me in a pretty strong way; I was meeting with the leadership from
Iceland yesterday, and we were talking about, well, distance used
to be a big problem, but now I actually play bridge with people from
Iceland as much as any country in the world, and I certainly couldn’t
have done that before.

Also I was meeting with leaders from Armenia, and we were talking about
their borders, and we were realizing that the Internet connection
is the thing that allows them to reach out and really not have
geographical issues or border issues be as limiting as they would
have been in the past.

Today, when we think of communication, we think of the phone, but the
phone is changing rapidly. It’s gone from being just a device of voice
communication to now one where you have information on the screen, you
can connect up to many people, and telephony is giving way to where on
the screen we can look at documents together, edit those together. Even
things like phone numbers will be laughable and obsolete the same way
that a record is today, because we won’t need to work in that fashion.

The PBX that you buy today to do voice communications will completely
go away as we use the Internet and the personal computer with the
magic of software to do that in a better way. When you go back to
your office, you’ll be able to look at your screen, see who called
while you were gone. Depending on who it is, you can give them the
right to look at your schedule and find a time when you will be there,
and connect up.

And so communication that’s been so difficult won’t be that way
at all. In fact, the promise that we can do meetings at a distance
and share documents and work with each other in a better way, that
videoconferencing dream has not been realized, but it will through
the hardware and software advances that are just rolling out now.

The Scottish Parliament here is a good example of using these modern
approaches. They take the debates, the committee meetings and they put
those up on the Web, so you can watch them as they’re taking place,
and go back and look at them later. As we apply advanced software
to be able to take the voice and automatically build a transcript,
you’ll be able to go and search those meetings and find exactly the
part you’re interested in. In fact, accountability for politicians
will be at a whole new level because you’ll be able to search and
look at everything they’ve said on a topic, and so the ability to
say one thing to one group and another thing to another group won’t
be quite as effective in the future, and perhaps that’s a good thing.

One of the breakthroughs that we’ve been investing in for a long,
long time is this speech capability, interacting with the computer
through speech. And where the quality of that keeps going up, there are
some groups and cases where it is starting to be used. For example,
if you’re in your car and you want to navigate through music or who
you want to talk to, or if you’re somebody who the keyboard doesn’t
work because you have Repetitive Stress Injury or something like that,
the software we’ve built in to Windows makes that very possible.

I do believe that as we improve the microphones and the software
quality, even for things like dictation, that will be very, very
important.

We also have a new level of collaboration where people with common
interests can go up and find each other and share information.

Gordon Brown talked about things like MySpace where that’s happening
at a consumer level. But it’s also happening at a business level.

Things like this Scottish Public Petitions Committee where people can
come in and say what their grievance is, and that finds its way to
the people who are interested, that’s using a digital community to
connect, to get feedback, to make things work in a better and more
efficient way.

I want to be clear that the hardware enablement that allows us
to move forward is moving at an incredible pace. It’s what we call
exponential improvement. You’ve often heard about that as Moore’s Law,
the doubling in transistors every couple of years. That’s happening
in communications speed, the speed of data we can move over an optic
fiber, the capacity of the disk. These things are not slowing down. And
when we couple it with these high resolution screens whose price is
coming down, and now the high-definition generation of TV, movies,
games, but also business insight, that screen technology makes a big
difference as well.

In the years ahead, what we call the tablet computer that you’ll able
to hold in your hands, that will be as thin and as light as a tablet,
although it’s not yet that good, it will be available, and it will be
available for hundreds of dollars. It will be able to record audio,
it will be able to let you take your notes on it, you can leave your
notes in handwriting or have them be recognized, and that will become
the common tool that people who go to meetings use, students when they
go to classes use, and, in fact, as we move the curriculum online,
they won’t need textbooks at all, they’ll make that transition.

We’re also building services up in the Internet, so that, for example,
if you used to have files on your PC, and you were worried about losing
them, we’ll automatically back them up on the Internet for a very,
very low cost. And if you connect up to another PC, you can access
that information. So, whether it’s photos or documents, they’ll be
available to you everywhere. In fact, even if you don’t have your PC
with you, if you pick one up in a waiting room or borrow someone’s,
as soon as you authenticate and say who you are, your information will
come down and be there. Even if you’re moving from your phone to your
PC, your data will be there with you, and we call this user-centric,
which is a very key advance to drive these things forward.

Now, TV itself is about to change. In many of the countries of Europe
these new high-speed networks are being built, and so instead of
TV being over the air, it comes over the Internet. Well, why is that
better? Well, it means that any information you want, whenever you want
it, is accessible. So, if there’s a topic you care about, the lecture
will show up in your TV guide because it knows your interests, or if
you have a kid who’s in some sport or an interest in that, that will
show up there as well. As you watch the news, any topic of interest,
you can ask for more information or skip over something about a sport
you’re not that interested in, and make good use of your time.

Interactivity is probably where this changes the most, where if
you’re learning a topic you can test your knowledge, you can get more
background information. And so interactive TV has long been discussed,
we’re finally building the infrastructure, the very high-speed Internet
that can carry these high-definition video signals that will make
that possible, and there will be a flowering of creativity around that.

For companies as we think about this, the way we reach out to consumers
and other businesses, the way we do training, the way we do meetings
at a distance, all of these things can be radically changed.

Let me now focus in on education, and some of the things that are
possible there. It’s important to be humble when we think about
technology and education, because there were many pronouncements made
when television came along that it would dramatically improve education
or when we had videotapes or when we had the first software applied
to education, computer-aided instruction, and it really didn’t make
a huge difference. But I would claim that we are now on the verge of
something where technology will make a difference.

You know, when you think about why does somebody go to a great
university, when I signed up to go to Harvard, what was it that was
attractive to me. Well, they had great lectures, incredible people,
Nobel Prize winners that a small group of us could go and listen to.

Well, that’s no longer going to be exclusive to students of the top
institutions. Those lectures, enough universities will put them out
on the Internet for free that you will be able to get that without
that exclusive tuition.

Then there’s the idea of accreditation that the university by giving
you a diploma, testing your knowledge, that that has a certain
reputation advantage. Well, there’s no reason now that that should
be coupled together with the place that you go and take the courses.

Accreditation can be done electronically online, and organizations
can have a reputation for doing that in a strong way.

We also have things like the discussion groups where you sit with
other students and talk, and that’s probably the most important part of
education. It’s motivational, it gets you over the parts that you’re
confused about. But even there, being able to connect up people at
a distance and have technology play a role is interesting in that.

Many of the community colleges in the United States have now said we’ll
just use those lectures that are online, and we’ll put our money and
energy into the interactive, smaller study groups, and so that we
can just be better at that, because that’s what we’re all about is
mapping this knowledge into skills that help people in jobs.

And so the very way that education thinks of its different elements,
technology allows for more specialization and improvement there.

We do think that a huge part of education, and many of you I have sat
and talked to about education have highlight this, that the role of
the teacher remains central and fundamental. And so how do we get them
excited about education, how do we get them to renew their skill set,
which after all when they went to college these tools weren’t there,
and they have to have a concern that if the students are more adept
at these tools than they are, that they won’t be able to maintain
control or the authority that they need to have. And so a lot has to
be invested in them and encouraging them to move forward on that.

Microsoft is very involved in education, things like our Partners in
Learning programs, our Innovative Teachers Forums. We have student
contests, like the Imagine Cup. An interesting focus we have now is
on working with governments around the world on the design of new
schools. This is not totally new to us. In Singapore we’ve had an
initiative there where they use tablets and do amazing things. Here in
the United Kingdom we’re partnered with a lot of these schools that are
under the program called Building Schools of the Future Initiative,
which we think is very exciting and four or five of those are really
pushing the limit and doing new things. In the United States we have
partnerships like the one in Philadelphia where actually a whole
new school was built around the ideas of if you take technology as
a given how can that work.

Well, what are some of the common elements of these things? Well,
empowering the student with a PC, a tablet type that will be very
inexpensive, training the teachers, changing the curriculum — that’s
a challenging one because you need to get to scale to do that really
well — and involving not just the students but also the parents
and the teachers by having Web sites so you can see your student’s
progress, their assignments, their schedule, and so the community
sees all these different things, and you can engage your child in a
discussion about what’s going on at school.

I’m very lucky that my daughter goes to a school that’s been using
laptop computers for over a decade now, and they’ve completely over
that time they’ve gotten better year by year, and the engagement in
learning is really quite phenomenal. The way math is done, the math
achievements have gone up very substantially, and not just for the
top 20 percent — this happens to be a girls’ only school — for the
entire class. The biggest change has actually been for that bottom
20 percent. So, there’s a lot that can be done there that makes a
very big difference.

One of the things that I think has been underestimated is actually
giving people tools to create curriculum. In the past we’ve thought of
that as a very monolithic process. You have companies that write these
textbooks, they go through an approval process, some things make it,
some things don’t. Well, here we can take all of the material on the
Internet, and use that as a starting point. We can take encyclopedias
like Wikipedia or Encarta as a starting point.

But we can also give teachers tools so they can take the information
and craft it, organize it so it fits for their school.

The Gates Foundation and some of the high school work we do in the
United States, and one of the things that’s been very successful is
having high schools that people can pick that have a theme, a theme
of science, a theme of construction, a theme of art, and all of the
topics are taken and motivated, you know, why should you learn math?

Well, at a construction school they use it to teach you how to keep
the building from falling down or how to not bid in a way that’s
going to put you out of business. And so you can take what students
have been unclear why should they learn these things, and bring them
into real life examples in a very strong way.

Well, how can you make that even better? Well, if the teacher can
take the material that’s out there, and add a little bit of their own
ideas, and then put that back into a community, a digital community
where it’s shared, we’re building on each other’s work. And so it’s
not just the way textbooks have done to date, it’s a much different
thing, and it involves pictures and animations and today’s news and
it can be put into a context.

And so for the first time teachers will be learning from each other.

In fact, we can actually take this idea of Webcasting and have the
classes where things are done well, and have people look at that,
comment on that, review it. And it takes the teacher’s job, which today
is a fairly isolated job, and lets everyone benefit from best ideas.

In fact, if we said today the best math teacher ever was somebody
150 years ago, we probably couldn’t prove that was wrong. And that
seems very strange with all these advances; how can we not have some
objective way of saying that, yes, we’ve made progress? And so now
we have the foundation that’s going to make that possible.

One of the things we want to do is scale up this idea of innovative
schools. And so actually we’ve got a new initiative that we’ve got 12
countries that are joining in on to actually do innovative schools
in each of those locations. And we’re not saying that these will be
identical. In fact, part of the goal here is to experiment and try
different things. After all, in the realm of government seeing what
other people are doing and benefiting from that is one of the ways
that improvements are made.

So, here we have many different countries — Germany, UK, France,
Finland, a number of others — all saying that they are willing to
put an investment in, and we’ve put our top technology people in,
who have been involved in these projects, and try and actually do
different and new things that build on these technological advances.

I do think it’s important to remember that the kids coming into
these schools, you know, when they go home at night they’re using
Xbox Live and talking to their friends, playing with their friends,
they’re editing high-definition movies. And so if all we do with them
is they come back into the classroom and there’s a chalkboard there,
that teacher has a hard time living up to the level of sort of drama
and richness that they’re getting in that digital world.

And yet the teacher is fundamental; I’m in no way downplaying the
importance of the role the teacher has. And so we have to back them
and get behind them, particularly the teachers who embrace the new
capabilities. The incentive systems to make that work will obviously
be different around the world, but it’s time to really start the
experimentation.

And so it’s exciting to be part of it. There are so many different
things that come under this e-government label, but the first and
foremost, as we heard from Gordon Brown, and certainly I want to
second that, are the things we can do to improve the education system.

Thank you.

http://www.egovmonitor.com/node/9312

The End Of An Era In The Armenian Genocide Debate: Will Recognition

THE END OF AN ERA IN THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE DEBATE: WILL RECOGNITION LEAD TO A TURKISH POLICY TRANSFORMATION?
By Mehmet Kalyoncu

Balkanalysis.com, AZ
Feb 5 2007

If Turkey gives up its opposition to potential US recognition of the
atrocities between Turks and Armenians that took place during World
War One as ¦Á ¡°genocide,¡± will its diplomatic hand ultimately be
strengthened? The following article argues that this just might be
the case.

What should have happened ninety-two years ago in 1915 is finally
likely to happen in 2007. Both Houses of the U.S. Congress are expected
to pass a resolution that recognizes the bitter WWI experience of
the Turkish Armenians as genocide after it is discussed in the House
Foreign Relations Committee in April. Ankara reflexively and as usual
warned Washington that bilateral relations may be damaged to a degree
never before seen. A similar resolution was stopped in the year 2000
due to Turkish diplomatic pressure. But times have changed.

For many Turks, passing the resolution will verify their suspicions
of the unfaithful friendship of the United States. Ankara is right
when it maintains that bilateral relations would be damaged severely
during a period in which the United States needs a reliable ally
in the Middle East. Nevertheless, by acknowledging the distinction
between recognizing the so-called Armenian genocide and letting the
U.S. Congress recognize it, Ankara could actually benefit by letting
the latter happen.

A sizeable part of the Turkish public, from officials to intellectuals
and ordinary men on the street, view the recognition of the so-called
Armenian genocide by the US Congress as an opportunity to break free
from an area of coercion in the United States¡¯ allegedly unfaithful
friendship, and from an almost century-long hysteria surrounding
the question of ¡°what if the United States recognizes the so-called
genocide?¡± In this regard, the recognition of the so-called genocide
seems to present a more of a threat to the interests of the United
States than to those of Turkey.

Recognizing the So-Called Armenian Genocide

Mr. Turgut Ozal, former President and Prime Minister of Turkey, was
among the first who sought to get rid of the hysteria by signaling
a tacit approval of recognizing the so-called genocide in 1991.

However, Ozal had to back up when political opponent Suleyman Demirel,
some high-ranking generals and the secular establishment accused him
of not being sensitive to this most important national matter. Nuzhet
Kandemir, then Turkish Ambassador to the US, ironically and yet
somehow proudly notes that he managed to convince Ozal to believe
that such an approval would not serve the Turkish national interests.
[1] More ironically, Ilter Turkmen, former Minister of Foreign Affairs,
suggests that Ozal did not in fact believe in what he said, but just
seemed so in order to stimulate a debate when he asked if it would
not be better for Turkey to recognize the so-called genocide. [2]

It is not clear whether Ozal thought the same way, but today it seems
like the ¡°genocide card¡± is destined to lose its value dramatically
as a foreign policy instrument against Turkey once the United States,
the long-time strategic ally of Turkey, recognizes the so-called
Armenian genocide. For so many years, thinks the majority of the
Turkish public, especially the Western European countries and the
United States have exploited the genocide question as a stick to beat
Turkey when the carrot did not indulge her. Today, US recognition is
likely to make the genocide issue much less effective as a foreign
policy instrument; with the threat of it gone, Turkey will be freed of
a longstanding preoccupation in its relations with the United States.

Although there is no unanimity among them, some in the media and
secular circles have speculated about the aftermath of the genocide
recognition and foresee potential sanctions against Turkey. These
speculations are often countered in the public debate by questions
such as: What happened after France long ago passed the resolution in
its parliament? What happened even after France declared it a crime
not to recognize the so-called Armenian genocide? Would the case be
any different with the United States?

International criminal law does not provide a guideline to deal with
historical atrocities, argues Swedish historian Bertil Dun¨¦r. [3]
Yet international law suggests the creation of an international
expert body representing both historians and the legal profession
to investigate such historical cases, and arrive at an eventual
condemnation of the responsible party or parties. This is actually
not much different from what Turkey, especially during the AK Party
government, has been advocating.

Whether the U.S. recognition makes any difference is something to
be seen in the future. However, it is not difficult to argue for now
that such recognition will have implications at multiple levels.

Possible Implications of the US Congress¡¯ Recognition

Turkey and Armenia are likely to gain from the US recognition of
the so-called genocide, while the United States is likely to lose in
the long term. First of all, the recognition will bring an end to a
prolonged era throughout which Turkey has suffered continuous hysteria
when considering the implications of the United States recognizing
the so-called Armenian genocide. Consequently, by the end of its de
facto liability to the United States for not recognizing the so-called
genocide, Turkey is likely to increase its bargaining power against
the US in their bilateral relations. Secondly, Turkish foreign policy,
which has essentially revolved around three issues throughout the
republic¡¯s history (defending against Armenian genocide allegations,
Cyprus, and relations with Greece), is likely to gain momentum that
could be developed down lesser-explored avenues such as increasing
bilateral relations with non-Western states.

Armenia has suffered profound economic hardship since the break-up
of the USSR. Some of this would have been lessened had the country
been able to develop economic relations with its immediate neighbor
to the west. However, the Armenian Diaspora¡¯s continuous efforts to
inflict pain on Turkey in the international arena have not helped in
this capacity. Beside its occupation of Azerbaijani territory adjoining
Karabagh, Armenia¡¯s constitutionally certified territorial claims on
areas of Eastern Turkey caused Turkey to impose a blockade on Armenia,
shutting off Yerevan¡¯s road and rail links to the West. [4]

However, with the Turkish people¡¯s overwhelming show of sympathy
following the recent murder of Turkish Armenian intellectual Hrant
Dink, Armenia¡¯s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Arman Kirakosyan
stressed his government¡¯s readiness to open full diplomatic relations
with Turkey unconditionally. [5] Such a gesture hints that in the
absence of the Diaspora influence, Turkey and Armenia are likely to
sort out the problems hindering the two countries¡¯ ability to engage
in bilateral political and economic relations.

What is in it for the United States?

What are the pros and cons of the US recognizing the so-called Armenian
genocide? Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) notes, ¡°[t]o truly dedicate
ourselves to improving human rights across the world, our government
must first learn from and properly condemn the mistakes of the past¡[6]
in order to express the rational behind his introduction of the
Armenian Genocide Resolution. He is right in that the U.S. government
should learn from and properly condemn the mistakes of the past, but
it hardly needs to look at the mistakes of others or go that far back
into history when it has more than enough of its own indiscretions
to use for that educative purpose. Understandably, however, Pallone
may not be able to distinguish between his own electoral interests
and the US national interests.

US-Turkish relations are unlikely to radically change due to the
Congress¡¯ recognition of the so-called genocide. Nor is Turkey
likely to take any radical action against the United States for that
matter, given the fact that it needs the US support to deal with the
Kurdish PKK separatists and the looming crisis in northern Iraq,
over Kirkuk. Nevertheless, the very fact that the United States
recognizes the so-called genocide would entail structural changes in
Turkey¡¯s foreign policy orientation, which would indirectly rather
than directly impact the US-Turkish relation in the long term.

Diminishing Influence of the ¡°White Turks¡±

There are likely to be losers on the Turkish side of the debate as
well once the so-called genocide is recognized by the US Congress.

These will include mainly the exclusivist and elitist secular
establishment in the state apparatus, its extension within the Ministry
of Foreign Affairs in Ankara, and their contacts in Washington,
who have been reportedly lobbying on behalf of Turkey.

Throughout the republic¡¯s history, a small number of elite members
and diplomats have been considered to have the decisive influence on
Turkey¡¯s foreign policy orientation, formulation and implementation,
serving as a conduit between Ankara and Washington. This diplomatic
elite has earned the popular moniker, Beyaz Turkler (¡°White Turks¡±),
and frequently derive from familial dynasties, some non-Anatolian in
origin. The name implies a sort of ¡°untouchable,¡± elevated image
compared to the unwashed masses.

The prolonged conflicts such as the Armenian genocide issue, Cyprus,
Turkish-Greek relations, which pretty much constituted the triad of
Turkish foreign policy in the second half of the 20th century, entailed
an exclusivist foreign policy apparatus independent of whatever
particular government was in office. Understandably, dealing with
such conflicts required diplomatic expertise and personal connections
in Washington. Yet some have speculated that by prolonging these
conflicts, the very exclusivist ¡°White Turks¡± elite has kept the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs immune from the more traditional-minded
bulk of Turkish society, the so-called ¡°Black Turks,¡± and maintained
their grip on the country¡¯s foreign affairs.

Winds of Change in Turkish Foreign Policy

Nevertheless, in the recent years the so-called White Turks grip on
Turkish foreign policy, which is marked simply by an unconditional
attachment to the West, has started to diminish gradually. Turkish
foreign policy has gained multiple dimensions with the AK Party¡¯s
efforts to reach out to Central Asia, Middle East, Africa and even
Latin America. This new foreign policy orientation has thus opened
the door to those intellectuals who speak the languages, know the
cultures, or have even lived in these new regions of interest.

This expansion of interests represents a welcome breath of fresh
air for a foreign policy establishment that has become somewhat
close-minded due to a limited orientation traditionally focused on
a few narrow issues. By reaching out to other corners of the globe,
Turkey will develop for itself a more sophisticated and cosmopolitan
mindset and inevitably a more prestigious place on the global stage.

The most significant example of the new breed of foreign policy
intellectuals is probably Dr. Ahmet Davutoglu, foreign affairs
counselor to the Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs. He
was allegedly the most influential thinker who crafted the new
multi-dimensional foreign policy paradigm of the AK Party government,
which resulted in closer relations of Turkey with its immediate
neighbors such as Syria, Saudi Arabia, and even Iran. The US Congress¡¯
recognition of the so-called Armenian genocide should only speed
up the transformation within the Turkish foreign policy apparatus,
which is in any case already underway, by eliminating a nagging issue
that has for too long forced Turkey to expend its political capital
in an investment promising little return.

[1]°Soykirimi tanisak daha iyi olmaz mi ¨C Would it not be better
if we recognize the genocide¡±, Hurriyet 7, March 2005, available
at viewid=546223

[2] Ibid

[3] Bertil Dun¨¦r, ¡°What Can Be Done about Historical Atrocities? The
Armenian Case¡± International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 8, No. 2,
pp. 217¨C233, Summer 2004

[4] Jon Gorvett, ¡°Armenia, Turkey Takes Steps
towards Rapprochement,¡± May 29, 2002, available at
rticles/eav052902.shtml

[5]°Cenazede gordukleri tablo Ermeni diasporasini
sasirtti¡± Zaman, January 25, 2007, available at
rno=492256

[6]°Armenian Genocide Resolution to be Introduced Tomorrow,¡± posted
by N.J. Dem. Rep.

Frank Pallone, January 29, 2007 available at

htt p:// era-in-the-armenian-genocide-debate-will-recogniti on-lead-to-a-turkish-policy-transformation/

–Bou ndary_(ID_h75GYC3dKrdPLV5FYpEOow)–

http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/haber.aspx?
http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/a
http://www.zaman.com.tr/webapp-tr/haber.do?habe
http://blog.thehill.com/category/politics/
www.balkanalysis.com/2007/02/05/the-end-of-an-

This mayor’s too big for L.A.

This mayor’s too big for L.A.

Mariel Garza, Columnist
LA Daily News Article
Last Updated: 02/03/2007 05:52:17 PM PST

LOS Angeles may be 44 miles from one end to the other. And there might
be nearly 4 million people living within 468 square miles. But L.A.’s
still not big enough to contain the ambitions of the Mayor Who Would
Be King.

When one is dreaming about shaping world policies, it must be a bore
to have to wake up to run a municipality – albeit one with the most
celebrities per mile and a surprising number of opportunities to cozy
up to busty actresses.

Sure, he cares about violence in Pacoima. But, heck, he’s also
concerned about violence in Israel. Reducing poverty in South L.A. is
no more important than solving it in the USA South.

Economic investment in Sylmar and economic divestment in Sudan are
both important parts of the Villaraigosa agenda. And global warming,
phhht – he’s already told Al Gore, Bill Clinton and Tony Blair exactly
where he stands on that.

Wait a minute … who is this guy? A visitor from Mzothro, the planet
of the many-tentacled mice men in the distant Yonga system, who
dropped into L.A. one day would no doubt be seriously confused as to
Villaraigosa’s political status in the world. He seems like a mayor
when he’s planting trees in South L.A. or anointing school board
candidates. He seems like a mayor when he’s mugging for the camera
while serving gruel to homeless people. There’s no doubt he’s mayor
when he’s backslapping the L.A. movers and shakers in his third-floor
chambers in City Hall.

But then there are all those other, more confusing images of Antonio:
chatting with Hillary, shooting the breeze with Mexican President
Vicente Fox. One day he’s marching in a local parade; the next, he’s
marching through China.

There he is snoozing – I mean, "resting his eyes" – through President
George W. Bush’s State of the Union speech, as if he’s as comfortable
in the House chambers as he is in Getty House. He was no doubt resting
up for his own big speech to the National Press Club to unveil a
nationwide plan to reduce poverty and expand the middle class. Later
that week he called for a "new direction" in Iraq.

The obvious conclusion is that Villaraigosa is not just mayor of Los
Angeles, but a Democratic National Candidate for Something. That he
will end up running for higher office is a given; which one is open to
speculation. Governor? Senator? Vice president? Commander-in-chief
himself? Who knows? As such, he must tend to his future constituency
as well as his current one.

He has more things on his mind than merely Brentwood and Boyle
Heights. Oh, he’s no Barack Obama. But he’s not far from that kind of
status. Meanwhile, Los Angeles isn’t just a mere steppingstone for
Villaraigosa’s political ambitions; it’s the testing grounds for them.

In sheer volume, no local politician trumps the governor in press
releases prepared and distributed every day. (It is not unusual to get
more than a dozen from Gov. Schwarzenegger’s press office each day,
including at least one with digital photos of Arnold posing with
farmers in Fresno or the like, and another with an audio clip of some
noteworthy thing he might have said that day about his health care
plan or how crutches hurt your armpits.) But in terms of scope,
Villaraigosa has the governor trumped.

For recent example: When a suicide bomber’s work killed three people
on Monday in Eilat, a southern port city in Israel, the mayor put out
a press release condemning the action: "We join the international
community in condemning this attack and hope this tragedy will not
deter all parties from working together to bring peace and put an end
to bloodshed in the area."

Last week, the media were notified of a mayoral press conference for
an international doubleheader. Villaraigosa was going to announce the
divestiture of $27 million in city pension funds from companies that
support the Sudanese government as a way to protest the genocide
there. But that wasn’t all. He was going to announce his support of a
congressional resolution by U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff to officially
recognize the Armenian Genocide.

Sadly, the exciting-sounding topics were dumped when the more
newsworthy (to some) "living-wage" deal was worked out the night
before. Not to worry, though. We can be assured that neither the
genocide in Sudan nor the historic genocide in Armenia will be
forgotten. Not in Los Angeles. Not during Villaraigosa’s reign.

Mariel Garza is a columnist and editorial writer for the Los Angeles
Daily News. Write to her by e-mail at [email protected].

Sociologist Expects More Election Fraud

Panorama.am

17:13 03/02/2007

SOCIOLOGIST EXPECTS MORE ELECTION FRAUD

‘The election campaign will be more tense this year with more election
fraud because about 50,000 people participate in the election process
starting from election committee members and finished with authorized
persons,’ Aharon Adibekyan, a renowned sociologist in Armenia, told a
debate with the editor-in-chief of Aravot daily.

In his words, they are uncontrollable for each other because of
conflict of interests. On the other hand, new players have come about
in the political field and the struggle is within the governing
power. The Prosperous Armenia, which has gained big power, is
center-oriented and is approaching to the Armenian Republican Party
(HHK), he said.

`However, if they reach a gentleman agreement and commit as little
violations as possible, it will be possible to have democratic
elections in Armenia,’ Adibekyan said. In his words, the developments
show that the two parties will reach such an agreement.

Aram Abrahamyan, editor-in-chief of Aravot daily, believes that the
elections are already faked. In his words, the authorities own all
administrative resources to attract the public. `The authorities have
power which are not connected to money,’ he said. Abrahamyan also
predicts that if Prosperous Armenia and HHK do not conflict each
other, no major violations will be reported. Abrahamyan believes the
Armenian Revolutionary Federation and United Working Party will get
only `left-outs’ of power.

Source: Panorama.am