Skip to main content

Azerbaijan is trying to displace all Armenians from Nagorno Karabakh in order to consider issue closed – Pashinyan

Save

Share

 11:44, 31 March, 2022

YEREVAN, MARCH 31, ARMENPRESS. In its public and diplomatic responses Armenia has recorded that there is the Nagorno Karabakh issue and the issue of the rights of Armenians of Nagorno Karabakh must be addressed in the context of the Armenia-Azerbaijan comprehensive settlement, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said at the Cabinet meeting today.

“Azerbaijan’s position is that there is no Nagorno Karabakh conflict, it is already solved. However, this position of Azerbaijan is not giving an answer to an important question: how in this case the issue of the rights of Armenians of Nagorno Karabakh has been solved? The answer of this question doesn’t exist, and this is the reason that the international community is constantly talking about the necessity for the comprehensive settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, which we see in different international platforms. Understanding that the Nagorno Karabakh issue exists and will be further expressed in the international agenda, Azerbaijan is trying not to solve this issue, but to close it, and this operation started from Parukh village in Askeran region which has an obvious tendency to continue. In fact, Azerbaijan is trying to displace all Armenians from Nagorno Karabakh, thus, for considering the issue closed”, the PM said.

He said if the Armenian side is wrong, then let Azerbaijan show concrete interest to the discussions relating to the rights and security guarantees of Armenians of Nagorno Karabakh.

“A matter that is pushed forward not only by Armenia, but also the entire international community.

Whereas official Baku is moving on an opposite direction, claiming that there is no Nagorno Karabakh. This is also the reason that the official circles of Azerbaijan quite aggressively react to the cases when the international community is using the name Nagorno Karabakh. However, the use of this name is definitely and undoubtedly legitimate”, he said, stating that the November 9 trilateral statement clearly mentions the terms Nagorno Karabakh, the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. “This statement has also been signed by the President of Azerbaijan”, he noted.

Pashinyan said Azerbaijan has adopted and is implementing a policy of “Nagorno Karabakh without Armenians”. It is also explained by arbitrary interpretations of the November 9 trilateral statement.

“Such are, for example, Azerbaijan’s constant claims that the November 9 trilateral statement recorded an obligation to withdraw Armenian units from Nagorno Karabakh. This is more than an arbitrary interpretation because the November 9 statement clearly states where the Armenian units should leave and where they should stay. I want to note that the statements made by the Azerbaijani President earlier show that this provision put forward by Azerbaijan is imaginary. During our trilateral meeting on November 26, 2021, mediated by the Russian President, the President of Azerbaijan has publicly announced that all provisions of the 2020 November 9 trilateral statement are implemented in practice, except the point relating to the unblocking of communications. I want to state that it’s obvious that the provision on returning prisoners of war, hostages and other persons held is also not implemented completely yet. The works on this issue continue”, Nikol Pashinyan said.

Italian Foreign Minister visits Armenian Genocide Memorial

Public Radio of Armenia
April 3 2022

Italy’s Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Luigi Di Maio visited the Tsitsernakaberd Memorial in Yerevan today,

The Foreign Minister laid a wreath at the memorial to the Armenian Genocide victims and paid tribute to their memory with a moment of silence.

Peskov: MP Delyagin`s remarks about the possibility of Russian strikes on Baku oil fields do not correspond to Moscow`s line

ARMINFO
Armenia,
Marianna Mkrtchyan

ArmInfo.MP Delyagin’s remarks about the possibility of Russian strikes on oil fields in Baku in no way correspond to Moscow’s line. This was stated in an interview with  journalists by press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry  Peskov, when asked to assess the statements of Russian MP Mikhail  Delyagin about possible Russian strikes on the oil infrastructure of  Azerbaijan because of the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh.

“This statement in no way corresponds and cannot correspond to the  official line of the Russian Federation.  It is rather a statement  that lies in the plane of personal emotions. We would urge to control  these emotions and refrain from such statements, especially in  relation to our partners. Azerbaijan belongs to the category of  partner states, especially in conditions when Russia is making very  energetic efforts to continue steps to maintain peace in the Karabakh  region and to fulfill their obligations by the parties,” Peskov said.

It should be noted that yesterday, Deputy Chairman of the Russian  State Duma Committee on Economic Policy Mikhail Delyagin, on the air  of the 60 Minutes program on the Russia 24 channel, called for harsh  and unequivocal punishment of Azerbaijan, or, as he called it, the  “Turkish proxy”, for its actions in Nagorno- Karabakh and  insubordination to Russian peacekeepers.

“It is necessary to restore normal statehood throughout Ukraine and  preferably as part of the Russian Federation. Without this,  denazification will be impossible. And as for the threats that exist  now, the Polish army has quite obviously moved closer to the borders  of Belarus. It is very likely that not as part of NATO, but in as  part of Poland, they will try to attack our ally,” Delyagin says.

According to him, there is also a threat of attack from Baku, because  the Azerbaijanis violated the truce in Artsakh. “Our [Russian Defense  Ministry] said that they retreated after we warned them. But Baku  officially stated that they did not leave the occupied territories  anywhere. Therefore, this policy of aggression on the part of  American satellites, in this case Turkey, or rather, Turkish proxies,  as we call them, poses a real danger. This should be punished harshly  and unambiguously. Why do we need the oil of the Azerbaijani  industry?  We do not need it, it is extremely vulnerable. If people  do not understand words, they will probably have to understand deeds.  If we don’t do this, we’ll cease to exist. The only question is  this,” the MP said.

This statement of the Russian MP caused hysteria in Baku. 

Azerbaijani press: Illegal Armenian groups forcibly distribute weapons, military uniforms to civilians in Khankandi

Dissatisfaction has increased among members of illegal Armenian armed groups in Azerbaijani territories, where Russian peacekeepers are temporarily stationed.

Local volunteers, who have been staying at the military posts for days due to a lack of staff, are protesting because they have not seen their families for a long time.

According to sources in Khankandi, in order to prevent this discontent and to fill for those currently sick, the separatist regime forces teenagers and the elderly to wear uniforms and take the posts.

Those who do not want to obey this instruction are persecuted and insulted.

According to the sources, the number of sick has increased among the illegal armed groups due to the deplorable conditions at the checkpoints in the direction of Askeran and in the shelters of these groups.

Azerbaijani press: Azerbaijani envoy urges end to Armenia’s "hate-driven" Karabakh agenda

By Vafa Ismayilova

Azerbaijani Consul-General in Los Angeles Nasimi Aghayev has urged an end to Armenia’s and foreign-based lobby’s “hate-driven agenda” regarding Karabakh. 

He made the remarks on his official Twitter page.

“Armenia and its radical lobby must stop holding 25,000 ethnic Armenian citizens of Azerbaijan in Qarabagh [Karabakh] as hostages to their extremist, hate-driven agenda. Once illegal armed groups are withdrawn [from Azerbaijani territories] our [ethnic] Armenian citizens will enjoy equal rights like other Azerbaijani citizens,”  he tweeted.

Aghayev also shared an official map of Armenia submitted by Yerevan to the UN and questioned the presence of illegal Armenian armed groups on the Azerbaijani territories, namely in Farrukh village, which was regained by the Azerbaijani armed forces.

“Here is the official map of Armenia submitted by Yerevan to the UN, and the location of the village of Farrukh (site of the latest tension). The question is: What are the Armenian armed groups doing in the internationally recognized sovereign territory of Azerbaijan?” wrote the consul-general. 

The diplomat stressed that the reason for the current tension is the failure to completely withdraw illegal Armenian forces from Azerbaijan.

“Almost all media reports and statements from foreign officials conveniently omit to mention an important (and not fully implemented) obligation, enshrined in the Azerbaijani, Armenian and Russian joint statement of 2020. Complete withdrawal of Armenian forces from Azerbaijan. It is the reason for the current tension,” he tweeted.

Azerbaijani servicemen have hoisted the flag of Azerbaijan in Khojaly region’s Farrukh village cleared of the illegal Armenian armed formations on March 27.

Baku earlier dismissed as inaccurate the Russian Defence Ministry statement on the withdrawal of Azerbaijani troops from Farrukh village.

Farrukh enters the administrative area of Pirlar village in Khojaly region located 16 km of Asgaran settlement and 32 km of Khankandi.

The Azerbaijani armed forces regained full control over the village, clearing it from illegal Armenian armed groups, who had to leave Azerbaijan’s internationally-recognized territories in Karabakh under the ceasefire deal signed by Baku, Moscow and Yerevan on November 10, 2020.

On March 20, 2022, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said in Sugovushan that the so-called Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region functioned in Azerbaijan for many years during the Soviet era for purely political purposes.

“As you know, the Armenians pursued a policy of aggression against our people, and our native Karabakh and a part of East Zangazur were in the hands of Armenians for about 30 years. It had to end and it did. We saw that no negotiations or political steps were bringing us any closer to our goal. We saw and knew that we must be stronger and more determined to protect our rights and restore historical justice. The Azerbaijani state, the Azerbaijani Army, all our Armed Forces fulfilled this historic mission in 2020,” he said.

He stressed that Azerbaijanis will live on liberated territories comfortably, in peace, tranquility and security and that the guarantor of peace and security is the Azerbaijani state and the Azerbaijani armed forces.

Artsakh soldier wounded in Azerbaijani shooting

 

Save

Share

 10:27,

STEPANAKERT, MARCH 25, ARMENPRESS. On March 24, the units of the Azerbaijani armed forces, in gross violation of the requirements of the 2020 November 10 trilateral statement, infiltrated into the responsibility zone of the Russian peacekeeping troops in the Republic of Artsakh, by taking under their control the village of Parukh in Askeran region and the adjacent positions, then attempted to ensure advancement in the eastern border of the Republic of Artsakh, the Defense Ministry of Artsakh said in a statement.

“The negotiations by the Russian peacekeeping troops and the relevant authorities of Artsakh, which lasted for hours, didn’t give significant results, and the Azerbaijani forces didn’t return to their initial positions. Moreover, in the night of March 25, the Azerbaijani units opened fire at the Defense Army’s units, using both various caliber firearms and an attacking drone.

As a result of the skirmish, at least 5 servicemen were killed from the adversary side. The Armenian side has one wounded. As of 09:00, the situation is relatively stable. We expect that the Russian peacekeepers will take measures to return the Azerbaijani units to their initial positions”, the statement says.

ARF Bureau: Azerbaijan seeks to expel Armenians from Artsakh

Panorama
Armenia –

The Bureau of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF, Dashnaktsutyun) on Saturday issued a statement on the latest Azerbaijani provocations in Artsakh. The full statement is below.

“The latest developments were fully expected. Taking advantage of the fact that the world is focused on the conflict in Ukraine, Azerbaijan is taking steps to complete its anti-Armenian programs, the new stage of which began with the 44-day war.

“At the same time, in recent months the military-political leadership of Azerbaijan has taken obvious actions to hinder the Russian peacekeeping mission deployed in Artsakh under the terms of the November 9, 2020 trilateral statement.

The disruption of gas supply to Artsakh amid freezing temperatures and the invasion of the village of Parukh and adjacent areas by Azerbaijan are aimed at expelling Armenians from Artsakh.

In these difficult times, it is necessary to counter the anti-Armenian policy of Azerbaijan and Turkey with nationwide forces.

For this purpose, it is necessary:

a) To appeal to members of the UN Security Council and the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairing countries not to ignore the anti-Armenian policy and steps of the Azerbaijan-Turkey duo against Artsakh and the Republic of Armenia.

b) Through protest actions against Azerbaijan and Turkey to draw the attention of political circles and the public to the policy of Armenophobia, which has gained a new momentum.

We demand that the Russian peacekeeping contingent deployed in Artsakh ensure the withdrawal of the enemy forces to their starting positions and the maintenance of peace.

ARF supports the Defense Army of the Artsakh Republic and is ready to assist it in every possible way to ensure the security of the Artsakh people.

This anti-Armenian steps of the Azerbaijani-Turkish alliance cannot go unanswered. The entire responsibility for the consequences of this policy lies with the two countries.”

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 03/23/2022

                                        Wednesday, 
Russia-West Standoff ‘Complicates’ International Mediation On Karabakh
Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan speaking in parliament (file photo).
Aggravating tensions in relations between Russia and the West over the war in 
Ukraine complicate the work of international mediators on the Nagorno-Karabakh 
issue, Armenia’s Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan acknowledged on Wednesday.
During a question-and-answer session of government members in parliament 
Mirzoyan, however, stressed that the international community continues to see a 
settlement of the issue within the format of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs 
involving Russia, the United States, and France.
“The ongoing hostilities in Ukraine have sharply complicated the work of the 
OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs up until the level of joint discussions, but based on 
very specific, certain signals and messages that I have been receiving from the 
co-chair countries and many other countries, I want to reaffirm that the 
international community continues to see the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh 
conflict in the context of the Minsk Group co-chairmanship. And this is quite 
encouraging,” the top Armenian diplomat said.
“We work on a daily basis to be able to organize a discussion under the [Minsk 
Group] co-chairmanship, including with the latest proposals,” Mirzoyan added.
The Armenian foreign minister reiterated that Yerevan saw nothing unacceptable 
in the five-point proposal of Azerbaijan for starting negotiations around a 
peace treaty with Armenia. He repeated that at the same time Armenia deems that 
it “does not fully address the possible agenda of comprehensive peace between 
Armenia and Azerbaijan.”
Baku insists that a future peace treaty with Yerevan should be based on five 
fundamental principles, including mutual recognition of each other’s sovereignty 
and territorial integrity, mutual reaffirmation of the absence of territorial 
claims to each other and a legally binding obligation not to make such claims in 
the future, abstaining from threatening each other’s security, delimitation and 
demarcation of the border with the establishment of diplomatic relations and 
unblocking of transport links.
In a recent interview with the state-run Armenpress news agency Mirzoyan said it 
is vital for the Armenian side that “the rights and freedoms of 
Nagorno-Karabakh’s Armenians be clearly guaranteed, and the status of 
Nagorno-Karabakh be finally clarified.” “For us, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict 
is not a territorial issue, but a matter of rights,” he said.
“One of the key points of our proposals is that the issue of the rights and 
status of Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh remains a matter of principle for us. It 
is impossible to call it a complete agenda until this issue is discussed there,” 
Mirozyan explained in parliament today.
On March 14, Armenia’s Foreign Ministry said that it had applied to the OSCE 
Minsk Group co-chairs requesting that they organize Armenian-Azerbaijani 
negotiations on a peace treaty “on the basis of the UN Charter, the 
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Helsinki Final 
Act.”
The foreign minister said that Armenia was informed by the Co-Chairs that its 
proposals had been passed on to Azerbaijan. He said, however, that Baku has not 
responded to Yerevan’s proposals yet.
EU Concerned Over ‘Renewed Disruption’ Of Gas Supply to Karabakh
Peter Stano, lead spokesperson for the EU’s Foreign Affairs and Security Policy 
(file photo).
The European Union is concerned about reports of a renewed disruption of the gas 
supply to Stepanakert, Nagorno-Karabakh, according to a spokesman.
“Following the first disruption of the supply on March 8 the EU encouraged 
Azerbaijan’s active engagement on the matter, which led to repair works and the 
resumption of the gas supply on March 19.
“There is an urgent need to ensure the immediate resumption of the gas supply to 
the affected local population, in particular in the context of the dire weather 
conditions, and the EU calls on the authorities in control to allow this to 
happen,” Peter Stano, lead spokesperson for the EU’s Foreign Affairs and 
Security Policy, said in a statement on Wednesday.
“The European Union is closely following this and other developments in the 
region and will continue its engagement towards sustainable peace and stability 
for the South Caucasus,” he added.
On Tuesday, Armenia’s Foreign Ministry accused Azerbaijan of deliberately 
disrupting the normal operation of the gas pipeline passing through the 
territory controlled by its military forces. “We consider this outrageous policy 
of systematic violence against Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh to be 
unacceptable,” it said.
The statement followed reports by de-facto Armenian authorities in 
Nagorno-Karabakh that natural gas supplies to the region had been cut by Baku, 
which created humanitarian problems for the population of the region still 
experiencing subzero temperatures despite early spring.
In remarks issued today Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Leyla 
Abdullayeva did not directly refer to the situation with gas supply to 
Nagorno-Karabakh, but urged official Yerevan not to interfere in what she 
described as “Azerbaijan’s internal affairs” regarding different situations.
Baku Tells Yerevan To Stop ‘Interfering In Azerbaijan’s Internal Affairs’
        • Lusine Musayelian
Leyla Abdullayeva, a spokeswoman for Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry (file photo).
Official Baku has urged authorities in Yerevan to stop “making unfounded 
statements and interfering in Azerbaijan’s internal affairs” after Armenia 
raised the issue of another disruption of natural gas supply to Nagorno-Karabakh 
affecting the humanitarian situation in the region.
In a statement on March 22 Armenia’s Foreign Ministry, in particular, accused 
Azerbaijan of deliberately disrupting the normal operation of a gas pipeline 
passing through the territory controlled by its military forces. “We consider 
this outrageous policy of systematic violence against Armenians of 
Nagorno-Karabakh to be unacceptable,” it said.
The statement followed reports by de-facto Armenian authorities in 
Nagorno-Karabakh that natural gas supplies to the region had been cut by Baku, 
which created humanitarian problems for the population of the region still 
experiencing subzero temperatures despite early spring.
Still earlier, the Armenian ministry slammed Baku over inviting United Nations 
officials to an event in Shushi (Susa), a key town and site in Nagorno-Karabakh 
contested by Armenians and Azerbaijanis.
“The Armenian Foreign Ministry first tries to interfere in the internal affairs 
of Azerbaijan by issuing a statement on the participation of international 
organizations in an event held in Azerbaijan. And now it [issues a statement] on 
a different matter,” Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Leyla Abdullayeva 
said on Wednesday as quoted by Azerbaijani media.
“We recommend that instead of making unfounded and illegal accusations, Armenia 
should ensure the fulfillment of its obligations, including the withdrawal of 
the remnants of its armed forces from the region, and thus contribute to 
regional peace and security,” she added.
Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry said on Tuesday that Chief of the General Staff of 
the Azerbaijani Army, Colonel-General Kerim Veliyev had met with a delegation 
led by Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces of the Russian Federation 
for Peacekeeping Activities, Colonel-General Alexey Kim. It said that during 
that meeting the sides “held a thorough exchange of views on the withdrawal of 
illegal Armenian armed groups from the territory of Azerbaijan and a number of 
other issues.”
EU Envoy Says Criminalizing Insult May Have ‘Chilling Effect’ On Freedom Of 
Expression
        • Siranuysh Gevorgian
Andrea Wiktorin, head of the EU Delegation to Armenia (file photo).
Criminalizing defamation or insult can have a serious chilling effect on the 
right to freedom of expression, Andrea Wiktorin, head of the European Union’s 
delegation to Armenia, said answering the RFE/RL Armenian Service’s questions on 
the recent Armenian legislation criminalizing “grave insults.”
In her written replies the EU ambassador referred to the case-law of the 
European Court of Human Rights of the Council of Europe, stressing that Armenia 
is a member of the Council of Europe.
She stressed that a law which interferes with freedom of expression “must be 
narrowly and precisely circumscribed so that it is legally predictable and 
certain.”
“But most importantly, the question is whether the law is implemented in a 
democratic and non-arbitrary manner, on the basis of objective criteria, subject 
to independent judicial control, where the judges consider the proportionality 
of the sanction. Should the insult amount to hate speech, which is speech likely 
to produce the effect of legitimizing, spreading or promoting violence, racial 
hatred, xenophobia, antisemitism or other forms of discrimination or hatred 
based on intolerance, arguably sanctions or restrictions can be more severe,” 
the EU diplomat said.
Asked whether the EU Delegation to Armenia shares the concerns of local and 
international human rights groups regarding this legislation, Wiktorin said that 
the EU Delegation is closely monitoring the situation and, together with 
colleagues in Brussels, “does its own legal analyses.”
The ambassador also said that they had “a general consultation” with Armenia’s 
Prosecutor-General Artak Davtian earlier this month rather than discussed only 
the law on grave insults. “We talked about a number of issues and had a very 
profound and detailed discussion. I am convinced he takes the issue very 
seriously,” Wiktorin said.
Under amendments to the Armenian Criminal Code voted for by only pro-government 
lawmakers and enacted last summer anyone insulting government officials and 
public figures risks paying hefty fines or going to jail for up to three months.
Opposition members and human rights activists in Armenia have criticized the 
authorities for adopting the measure, describing it as an infringement of free 
speech.
A number of international organizations, including the Parliamentary Assembly of 
the Council of Europe, have called on Armenia to decriminalize “grave insults.” 
The U.S. democracy watchdog Freedom House has repeatedly said that the passage 
and enforcement of the controversial law highlighted a “clear degradation of 
democratic norms” in Armenia.
Armenian authorities have defended the controversial law. Meeting with the EU 
ambassador on March 3, Armenia’s Prosecutor-General Davtian said that the law is 
necessary for “reducing or neutralizing the scale and impact of hate speech.”
Armenia’s Constitutional Court on March 22 began considering the 
constitutionality of the legislation following a claim lodged by the country’s 
ombudsperson. The court said that the examination of the claim proceeds in 
writing.
Armenian Trucks Stuck At Russian-Georgian Border
        • Narine Ghalechian
Trucks stuck in a long queue at the Upper Lars checkpoint along the 
Russian-Georgian border, .
Hundreds of Armenian trucks have been stuck at both sides of a Russian-Georgian 
border checkpoint after heavy snowfalls brought traffic along the only road 
connecting Armenia to Russia via Georgia to a standstill.
Armenian authorities say there is little they can do to help the truck drivers 
who have spent weeks in what is reported to be a 150-kilometer queue of vehicles 
waiting to cross the border.
Such situations at the Upper Lars checkpoint are typical of winter months, but 
also happen during the rest of the year when landslide block traffic along a 
mountain serpentine in Georgia.
Local authorities are trying to clear the road from snow, but heavy snowfalls 
still make the Gudauri section of the road impassable for trucks.
“It is very narrow, ours are long trucks, they don’t fit into those turns… 
Snowplows have been trying to clean the road, but the wind blows more snow 
there,” said Tigran Gabrielian, one of the Armenian drivers stuck at Upper Lars.
Many truck drivers are concerned that perishables that they are transporting 
will soon go bad.
“The thing is that a lot of diesel fuel is spent every day to maintain the 
necessary temperature inside the refrigerator. We hope that at least some of the 
cargo will be preserved,” Gabrielian said.
“I am transporting tomatoes and have to keep the temperature inside the 
refrigerator at +6 degrees Celsius, but still it is very likely that some of 
them will go bad,” he added.
Another Armenian truck driver Azat Davtian said that after spending about 20 
days in the queue he and his fellows were also worried about the prospect of 
losing their cargoes and freezing if they ran out of fuel.
“We have three trucks loaded with apples. We have been stranded here for 19 
days. Our diesel fuel will end soon. I don’t know what we are going to do then. 
But something will have to be done,” Davtian said.
Armenia’s Ministry of Emergency Situations said that as many as 375 vehicles had 
lined up on the Russian side of the Russian-Georgian border due to bad weather 
conditions. The Armenian ministry said it had no data on the number of vehicles 
stuck in traffic at the Georgian side of the border.
Arion Logistics cargo company owner Gurgen Vanetsian said that 25 of their 
trucks have for more than three weeks been stuck in traffic on both sides of the 
border. He said that drivers constantly ask for money so that they can buy 
something to eat in nearby villages where food now costs twice as much as its 
normal price. He said that already now they are counting their costs.
Meanwhile, truck drivers in the long queue have set up an online group that now 
has about 4,000 users to share information on the situation. All appear to have 
the same problems: requests from banks to repay overdue loans, problems with 
food and fuel and concerns about perishables in their trucks.
Armenian authorities say that representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs 
and the State Revenue Committee are dealing with the situation, but they 
acknowledge that little can be done to change the weather conditions.
Aram Tananian, a customs attache at the Armenian embassy in Russia, said that he 
was trying to help the drivers as much as it was possible to do in a long queue 
at a border checkpoint outside Armenian jurisdiction.
“Of course, we drive along that 150-kilometer queue and stop and approach people 
there. But we can’t really do much to solve everyday problems that these people 
have,” the official said.
Tananian also denied claims by some companies about discrimination against 
Armenian drivers at the border.
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2022 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

Alienation of state property to non-residents ruled out in Armenia – State Property Management Committee Chair

Save

Share

 13:12,

YEREVAN, MARCH 16, ARMENPRESS. Chairman of the State Property Management Committee of Armenia Arnak Avetisyan assures that alienation of state property to non-residents is ruled out in Armenia.

Commenting on reporter’s statement according to which Turkish nationals are acquiring lands in Armenia, Arnak Avetisyan said this question is not addressed to him if the lands are purchased from the second market, from private individuals.

“I know that according to the Armenian legislation, lands are not sold to non-residents, it is banned. In other words, only the citizens of Armenia can own land in Armenia. As for the state property, such cases are ruled out”, he said.

In response to the reports claiming that in 2020-2021 Azerbaijani nationals have acquired 6 real estate in Armenia, Avetisyan said the real estate and the land must be differentiated. He said their Committee has no data on real estate sales, but state property has not been alienated to non-residents, he noted.

Armenia could soon apply to OSCE MG Co-Chairs to initiate peace talks with Azerbaijan, foreign office spokesperson says

ARM INFO


ArmInfo.Vahan Hunanyan, Spokesperson for the RA Ministry of Foreign Affairs, has answered a question by the Armenpress news agency.  

Question: Armenia has repeatedly stated its readiness to sign a peace  treaty with Azerbaijan and reciprocal statements have also been made  by Azerbaijan. Are concrete steps being undertaken in this regard?

Answer: The signing of the agreement should be surely preceded by a  negotiation process. Since mutual statements have not yet developed  into a concrete negotiation process, as the two countries do not have  rich experience of direct negotiations, Armenia will probably soon  apply to the mediators – the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs to initiate  the peace negotiations with Azerbaijan. The issue is currently being  elaborated.