Exhibition Of Armenian Artists Organized At Oshagan Union Of Cyprus

EXHIBITION OF ARMENIAN ARTISTS ORGANIZED AT OSHAGAN UNION OF CYPRUS

Noyan Tapan
Apr 15, 2009

CYPRUS, APRIL 15, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. The Armenian Cultural
Association Hamazkayin Oshagan organised an exhibition of Armenian
Cypriot artists at the Utudjian Hall of the Armenian Prelature of
Cyprus, Nicosia, under the auspices of the Armenian Representative,
Mr Vartkes Mahdessian.

The exhibition was open between 6-8 March 2009. Twenty four Armenian
Cypriot artists of all ages proudly exhibited 88 works in total. The
themes varied, ranging from paintings, mosaics, mirrors and photographs
to articles of clothing, jewellery, carpets, chairs, pillows, silk
works, wood works, patchworks and charms. This plethora of exhibits
reminded us that art is so much more than just painting. The most
sentimental piece was made by Tatiana Ferahian from Limassol, a time
capsule with bone remains from Genocide martyrs, brought to Cyprus
by her mother in 2005 from the Der Zor desert, a powerful reminder
of the atrocities the Armenian nation endured in the end of the 19th
and the beginning of the 20th centuries, yet it managed to survive,
thrive and prosper.

Other Armenian themes included four wooden khachkars (cross-stones),
created by Aris Utujian, four of Artin Anmahouni’s paintings (new Sourp
Asdvadzadzin church, the Magaravank in Pendadhaktylos, Noravank, and
Ararat), all three of well-known John Guevherian’s paintings (Victoria
street, the old Sourp Asdvadzadzin church, and Noravank Monastery),
the Ayp Pen Kim (the Armenian alphabet, by Shoghik Arakelian) and the
Garmiravor church, by Manoug Mangaldjian. The famous artist Vartan
Tashdjian, who was also a speaker at the exhibition, chose to display
only one theme: the Melkonian. In his seven paintings we were able
to see the various buildings and yards of the Melkonian, whose memory
must never fade away and the fight for its re-opening must never cease.

Ceasefire Violated In Line Of Contact

CEASEFIRE VIOLATED IN LINE OF CONTACT

Panorama.am
17:22 09/04/2009

On the night of 9 April the ceasefire has been violated in the Line
of Contact of Azerbaijan-Karabakh armed forces, reports the Defense
Ministry of Nagorno Karabakh. According to the source the Azeri armed
forces fired the military positions of NKR army in the directions
of Ashagh Abdurahmanli, Nouzger, Chakhrly, Corgan, Ashagh Veysali,
Kuropatkino and Djraberd. The NKR defense army took appropriate
measures to make the rival stop firing.

U.S. To Join Direct Talks On Iran Over Iran’s Nuclear Program

U.S. TO JOIN DIRECT TALKS ON IRAN OVER IRAN’S NUCLEAR PROGRAM

PanARMENIAN.Net
09.04.2009 13:03 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ In a dramatic break from previous policy, the
United States will join direct talks between UN and European powers
and Iran over Tehran’s nuclear program, the State Department announced
Wednesday.

Wednesday’s announcement is the latest step by the Obama administration
to engage Iran diplomatically.

The Obama administration has asked the European Union’s international
policy chief, Javier Solana, to invite Iran to new talks with the
permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany, State
Department spokesman Robert Wood said.

"If Iran accepts, we hope this will be an occasion to seriously
engage Iran of how to break the logjam of recent years and work in a
cooperative manner to resolve the outstanding international concerns
about its nuclear program," Wood said.

Prior to word from State, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran’s hard-line
President, said that his country "welcomes a hand extended to it."

Iran so far has refused Security Council demands to halt its production
of enriched uranium, which it has said will be used to fuel nuclear
power plants. The United States has accused Tehran of concealing
efforts to develop a nuclear bomb, and the UN’s nuclear watchdog
agency said it has failed to resolve questions about the aim of
Iranian program.

The Bush administration had insisted that Iran first stop its nuclear
program before any talks with the United States or its allies could
go forward. Wednesday’s announcement is the latest step in the Obama
administration’s efforts to engage the Islamic republic diplomatically
after nearly three decades without formal ties.

Washington, which has not had diplomatic relations with Iran since
1980, has participated in previous talks only as an observer. Wood
would not speculate about whether a meeting involving Iran and the
rest of the group might lead to direct one-on-one meetings of U.S. and
Iranian officials, CNN reports.

Demanding Sahakashvili’s Resignation

DEMANDING SAHAKASHVILI’S RESIGNATION

A1+
08:10 pm | April 09, 2009

Politics

The Georgian opposition demanded the resignation of Georgian President
Mikheil Sahakashvili during a rally held today near the parliament
building in Tbilisi at 3 p.m.

The opposition wants change of power in Georgia through means of the
Constitution and without any brutality.

Former Georgian parliament speaker Nino Burjanadze also addressed
rally participants today and joined them in their protest against
Sahakashvili.

"Sahakashvili lost in the war and didn’t even plead for mercy. I
am going to fight until the end to see him resign and to see this
country make a free choice," said Burjanadze. After her speech,
opposition leaders declared that they will not make any compromises
for Sahakashvili’s resignation.

Mikheil Sahakashvili sees no grave prerequisites for change of power
and his resignation. In his interview today he stated that the people
gathered in central Tbilisi are people who are not happy with their
condition and have no support from other citizens of Georgia besides
citizens of Tbilisi.

The opposition’s rally continues at the Rustavel Street as we
speak and residents of different regions are making their way to
Tbilisi. Georgian presses state various numbers of participants,
however in any case that number exceeds the tens of thousands mark.

Expressed Condolence On Behalf Of Armenians

EXPRESSED CONDOLENCE ON BEHALF OF ARMENIANS

A1+
06:21 pm | April 07, 2009

Official

Serzh Sargsyan sent a letter of condolence to Italian President
Giorgio Napolitano.

"On behalf of me and the people of Armenia, I express my condolences
to you and the friendly people of Italy for the number of deaths and
destruction caused by the earthquake that took place in the LevAkvila
center of the Abruzzo region.

I share your pain and wish rapid recovery from this devastating
disaster. As for friends and relatives of the victims, I wish them
strength and patience," as stated in the letter.

Nearly 200 people died as a result of the earthquake that took place
in central Italy yesterday and thousands of people were left homeless.

Based on the evaluation of the U.S. Geological Studies Organization,
the earthquake was measured 6.3 on the Richter scale.

Mujahideen In War In Karabakh

MUJAHIDEEN IN WAR IN KARABAKH
Araks Pashayan

noravank.am/en/?page=analitics&nid=1 735
06 April 2009

The institution of mujahideen1 in its current format had been arranged
in 1980-1990th during the war in Afghanistan and was connected with
the realities of the "cold war". During the whole war in Afghanistan
(1979-1988) the US, particularly through the Saudi and Pakistani
special services, had furnished large-scale financial and military
assistance to the groups fighting against Soviet army. As a result,
after the end of the war and the withdrawal of Soviet troops the
resource of the Afghans and Arab Afghans2 who had a big military
experience was formed and which later attached special significance
to the war in the name of Islam and the idea of "Islamic solidarity"
and was involved in the military actions in Algeria, Central Asia,
the Balkans and Caucuses. That very resource was used while planning
and arranging a number of international terrorist acts.

It is characteristic that in 1991-1994 and most actively in 1993-1994
(till the truce, concluded in 1994) mujanedeen fought on the side of
Azerbaijanis in the war in Nagorno-Karabakh.

>From the very beginning of the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh Azerbaijan
had a certain expectations from Islamic circles in the issue of the
settlement of the conflict and the collaboration with those circles
seemed to be promising. After the independence Azerbaijan underlined
its belonging to the Muslim world, trying to make religious accents
in Armenian-Azerbaijani war.

In 1993, when the military forces balance cardinally changed in the
favour of the Armenians Azerbaijan (after the accession to the power of
Heydar Aliyev) made certain steps to include in the military actions
the mercenaries who were enlisted in different Islamic countries,
mainly mujahideen. In 1993 the minister of internal affairs of
Azerbaijan Rovshan Zavadov met the prime-minister of Afghanistan and
the leader of "Hezbe Eslami" ("Islam party") Gulbeddin Hekmatiar and
reached to an accommodation about sending mujanideen to Azerbaijan. And
in several months an Afghani delegation, which included the well-known
Afghani field commander Rashid Dustum, visited Baku to discuss on the
state level the issues concerning approved collaboration. As a result
the air communication was established between Baku and Kabul. Among
the mojahideen sent to Azerbaijan Afghans prevailed (though there were
also Arab Afghans). They were mainly fighters of "Hezbe Eslami" group.

According to the convictions of separate experts the redeployment of
mojahideen to Baku could not be implemented without the assistance
of Pakistani and American special services.

The exact number of the mojahideen who were involved in the military
actions has not been specified till now.

That number varies within the range of 1000-3000. In one of the
publications of "Washington Post" for 1994 it was mentioned that the
mercenaries from Afghanistan, Iran, The United States, Russia and
Turkey were included in Azerbaijani army, and particularly Turkey
and Iran provided Baku with military instructors. The same source,
referring to the western diplomats, mentioned that in 1993 Azerbaijan
enlisted 1000 Afghan mojahideen.

According to some information mojahideen were mainly placed in the
south-eastern districts of Nagorno-Karabakh front, i.e. in the line
of Fizuli and Zangelan. They did not associate with Azerbaijani
soldiers and this was conditioned by several factors. Azerbaijani
soldiers did not follow the norms of Sharia, used alcohol drinks and
this caused confrontation between the parties. Except this mojahideen
felt repugnance towards Slavonic mercenaries, fighting in Azerbaijani
army. Azerbaijani authorities tried to conceal the participation of
mojahideen in military actions. In order not to publish the issue
they concealed the real number of losses among Afghanis and sent not
all the bodies of killed mojahideen to Afghanistan3.

It is characteristic that during the whole war in Nagorno-Karabakh
Armenia had tried to resist the military assistance from Islamic
circles to Azerbaijan. The letter of the president of Armenia dated
May 1994 to the authorities of Afghanistan, where the concern was
expressed about the involvement of the mojahideen in the war in
Nagorno-Karabakh, may serve as an evidence of that. In the letter of
response the president of Afghanistan condemned the involvement of the
citizens of Afghanistan in the war in Nagorno-Karabakh and expressed
the hope that the conflict will be settled by peaceful means, which
can be regarded as a declarative move.

In this connection it is also remarkable that on December 21, 1994
the letter addressed to the Special Rapporteur of the Commission
on Human Rights on the question of the use of mercenaries, where
the Authorities of Armenia expressed their complain with the
fact that Azerbaijan used extensively the mercenaries in the war
in Nagorno-Karabakh4. The information about the mercenaries (from
the CIS and other countries: Iran, Turkey and Afghanistan) in the
letter was substantiated by appropriate sources. There was a number
of evidences concerning mojahideen, the spheres where they had served
(860 and 723 motor brigades, air, ground forces, artillery, special
services) and the districts of their dislocation (Jdanov, Shamkhori
regions, the region adjacent to Mingechau, city of Al-Bayrami) were
mentioned and the names of 12 mojahideen enclosed. One of them was
Bakhtiyar Verbollah Baberzain (from the city of Mozari Sharif), who
had been captured by Nagorno-Karabakh forces and with whose help a
number of facts concerning mojanideen were disclosed.

Though the Azerbaijani authorities deny the involvement of mojahideen
in the military actions, it is a proved fact, which is based on the
bodies of mojahideen (in their traditional clothes) killed during
the war and their documents in their traditional languages (Dari
and Pushtu), the religious literature published in Afghanistan and
Pakistan and other material proves found by the defense forces of
Nagorno-Karabakh.

Recently there has been an interesting research carried out by
the Michael Taarnby from Real Instituto Elcano Spanish research
centre concerning the involvement of mojahideen in Nagorno-Karabakh
war5. He emphasizes a number of issues in his "The Mujaheddin in
Nagorno-Karabakh" case study, i.e. the issue of the involvement of
mojahideen in Nagorno-Karabakh war and their role in the subsequent
Jihad movements. He divides mujaheddin, who were in Karabakh in three
main groups. The first group includes those who passed from Azerbaijan
to other Caucasian regions and were involved in other conflicts; the
second includes those who settled in Azerbaijan (those who became the
stronghold of militant Islam in Azerbaijan): and in the third group
are deceased Afghanis.

In the opinion of the researcher the majority of the mojahideen who had
passed through the war had returned home, the other part was mostly
involved in anti-Russian struggle. i.e. in the war in Chechnya where
they used the experience from Nagorno-Karabakh war. Among them was
a citizen of Saudi Arabia the well-known field commander of Chechen
descent Hattab, who after the Jihad in Afghanistan was involved in the
anti-governmental Islamic movements in Tajikistan and then in war in
Nagorno-Karabakh. Using the contacts he gained during Karabakh war,
Hattab passed to North Caucasus (Chechnya and Dagestan) and had been
one of the key persons in Jihad movement until he was killed (in
2002). In his interview dated 2005 the commander of the Azerbaijani
army Azer Rustamov mentioned that hundreds of Chechen volunteers under
the command of field commanders Shamil Basaev and Salman Raduev fought
during the war in Nagorno-Karabakh. But due to the heavy casualties
they were obliged to leave.

M. Taarnby makes rather interesting observation. He mentions that war
in Nagorno-Karabakh stayed beyond the vision of international Jihad
movement. There have been almost no manipulations on this issue in
the oratory of militant Islam. Though there were many mojahideen
killed in that war none of the leader of Jihad movement (including
Bin Laden) ever turned to that item. In the opinion of the researcher
this is mainly conditioned by the fact that in Nagorno-Karabakh war
Azerbaijani side was defeated. Except this, as Taarnmy mentions,
mojahideen were engaged in the war mainly as mercenaries.

The involvement of mojahideen in the war in Nagorno-Karabakh in a
certain manner encouraged the establishment of radical Islam structures
(including Wahhabi) in Azerbaijan. Since 1990th a number of branches of
international radical Islam organizations ("Hizb Attahrir", "Tablighi
Zamaat", "Al-Jihad Al-Islam", "Jeish Ul-Islam", "Al-Djihad" and others)
have been working in Azerbaijan. The territory of Azerbaijan had been
often used to supply weapons, financial, material and other means
and fighters to Chechnya and Dagestan.

After the 9/11, according to the American media, mainly New York
Associated Press, the Congressing Research Service in its repot,
which was published on September 10, 2001, stated that separate
groups and individuals who was connected with Osama Bin Laden and "Al
Qaeda", used the territory of Azerbaijan as a stronghold of terrorist
network. It was mentioned that in 1998 after the explosions in the
American embassies in Nairobi (Kenya) and Dar Es Salami (Tanzania)
the FBI established 60 telephone calls between Bin Laden and his
associates from the branch of "Islam Jihad" ("Al-Islam Al-Jihad") in
Baku. (It is not a mere chance that after the events on September 11
many had spoken about the possible Azerbaijani trace in that terrorist
act). In that period and after 2001 there was a pressure Washington
on Azerbaijan. They demanded to struggle against radical Islamist
organizations and Azerbaijani authorities initiated that struggle. But
even today there is a possible threat of Islam radicalization and
special services of the country always keep it in the field of vision.

In fact, war in Nagorno-Karabakh was the first test mojahideen passed
in post-Soviet space. Armenian defense forces, as a matter of fact,
succeeded in standing against international Jihad structures. The
heavy defeat of Azerbaijan in war in Nagorno-Karabakh and the heavy
casualties of Afghans compelled them to leave Azerbaijan and move to
North Caucasus and the Balkans.

BAKU: Azerbaijani FM Urges EU To Make Armenia Take Constructive Appr

AZERBAIJANI FM URGES EU TO MAKE ARMENIA TAKE CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH IN TALKS ON NAGORNO KARABAKH

Today.Az

Apri l 7 2009
Azerbaijan

Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan Elmar Mammadyarov has met here today
with European Union Special Representative for the South Caucasus
Peter Semneby.

According to the Foreign Ministry`s press-service, discussions at the
meeting revolved around EU-Azerbaijan cooperation, Eastern Partnership
initiative, regional stability, energy security and other issues of
mutual interest.

On the Eastern partnership initiative, Mammadyarov said Azerbaijan
chose the path of European integration, stressing this program is
important for the country as it will contribute to security, economic
and humanitarian cooperation between Azerbaijan and European Union.

Mammadyarov briefed Semneby on the peace talks on the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict, stressing the need to urge Armenia to take a constructive
approach in the negotiations. Mammadyarov said the present situation is
unacceptable. He emphasized the need to restore territorial integrity
of Azerbaijan on the basis of international law.

http://www.today.az/news/politics/51365.html

Text Of President Barack Obama’s Speech To The Turkish Parliament

TEXT OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA’S SPEECH TO THE TURKISH PARLIAMENT

The Associated Press
April 6, 2009 – 11:43 AM

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Mister speaker, madam deputy speaker, distinguished
members, I am honored to speak in this chamber, and I am committed to
renewing the alliance between our nations and the friendship between
our people.

This is my first trip overseas as president of the United States. I’ve
been to the G-20 summit in London, and the NATO summit in Strasbourg,
and the European Union summit in Prague. Some people have asked me
if I chose to continue my travels to Ankara and Istanbul to send a
message to the world.

And my answer is simple: Evet — yes.

Turkey is a critical ally. Turkey is an important part of Europe. And
Turkey and the United States must stand together — and work together
— to overcome the challenges of our time.

This morning I had the great privilege of visiting the tomb of your
extraordinary founder of your republic. And I was deeply impressed by
this beautiful memorial to a man who did so much to shape the course
of history.

But it is also clear that the greatest monument to Ataturk’s life
is not something that can be cast in stone and marble. His greatest
legacy is Turkey’s strong, vibrant, secular democracy, and that is
the work that this assembly carries on today.

This future was not easily assured , it was not guaranteed. At the
end of World War I, Turkey could have succumbed to the foreign powers
that were trying to claim its territory, or sought to restore an
ancient empire. But Turkey chose a different future.

You freed yourself from foreign control, and you founded a republic
that commands the respect of the United States and the wider world.

And there is a simple truth to this story: Turkey’s democracy is your
own achievement. It was not forced upon you by any outside power,
nor did it come without struggle and sacrifice. Turkey draws strength
from both the successes of the past, and from the efforts of each
generation of Turks that makes new progress for your people.

Now, my country’s democracy has its own story. The general who led
America in revolution and governed as our first president was, as many
of you know, George Washington. And like you, we built a grand monument
to honor our founding father — a towering obelisk that stands in
the heart of the capital city that bears Washington’s name. I can see
the Washington Monument from the window of the White House every day.

It took decades to build. There were frequent delays. Over time,
more and more people contributed to help make this monument the
inspiring structure that still stands tall today. Among those who
came to our aid were friends from all across the world who offered
their own tributes to Washington and the c ountry he helped to found.

And one of those tributes came from Istanbul. Ottoman Sultan
Abdulmecid sent a marble plaque that helped to build the Washington
Monument. Inscribed in the plaque was a poem that began with a few
simple words: "So as to strengthen the friendship between the two
countries." Over 150 years have passed since those words were carved
into marble. Our nations have changed in many ways. But our friendship
is strong, and our alliance endures.

It is a friendship that flourished in the years after World War II,
when President Truman committed our nation to the defense of Turkey’s
freedom and sovereignty, and Turkey committed itself into the NATO
Alliance. Turkish troops have served by our side from Korea to Kosovo
to Kabul. Together, we withstood the great test of the Cold War. Trade
between our nations has steadily advanced. So has cooperation in
science and research.

The ties among our people have deepened, as well, and more and
more Americans of Turkish origin live and work and succeed within
our borders.

And as a basketball fan, I’ve even noticed that Hedo Turkoglu and
Mehmet Okur have got some pretty good basketball games.

The United States and Turkey have not always agreed on every issue,
and that’s to be expected — no two nations do. But we have stood
together through many challenges over the last 60 years. And because
of the strength of our alliance and the endura nce of our friendship,
both America and Turkey are stronger and the world is more secure.

Now, our two democracies are confronted by an unprecedented set
of challenges: An economic crisis that recognizes no borders;
extremism that leads to the killing of innocent men and women and
children; strains on our energy supply and a changing climate; the
proliferation of the world’s deadliest weapons; and the persistence
of tragic conflict.

These are the great tests of our young century. And the choices
that we make in the coming years will determine whether the future
will be shaped by fear or by freedom; by poverty or by prosperity;
by strife or by a just, secure and lasting peace.

This much is certain: No one nation can confront these challenges
alone, and all nations have a stake in overcoming them. That is why we
must listen to one another, and seek common ground. That is why we must
build on our mutual interests, and rise above our differences. We are
stronger when we act together. That is the message that I’ve carried
with me throughout this trip to Europe. That is the message that I
delivered when I had the privilege of meeting with your president
and with your prime minister. That will be the approach of the United
States of America going forward.

Already, America and Turkey are working with the G20 on an
unprecedented response to an unprecedented economic crisis. Now,
this past week, we came together to ensure that the world’s largest
economies take strong and coordinated action to stimulate growth and
restore the flow of credit; to reject the pressures of protectionism,
and to extend a hand to developing countries and the people hit
hardest by this downturn; and to dramatically reform our regulatory
system so that the world never faces a crisis like this again.

As we go forward, the United States and Turkey can pursue many
opportunities to serve prosperity for our people. The president
and I this morning talked about expanding the ties of commerce and
trade. There’s enormous opportunity when it comes to energy to create
jobs. And we can increase new sources to not only free ourselves from
dependence of other energies — other countries’ energy sources, but
also to combat climate change. We should build on our Clean Technology
Fund to leverage efficiency and renewable energy investments in
Turkey. And to power markets in Turkey and Europe, the United States
will continue to support your central role as an East-West corridor
for oil and natural gas.

This economic cooperation only reinforces the common security that
Europe and the United States share with Turkey as a NATO ally, and
the common values that we share as democracies. So in meeting the
challenges of the 21st century, we must seek the strength of a Europe
that is truly united, peaceful and free.

So let me be clear: The20United States strongly supports Turkey’s
bid to become a member of the European Union.

We speak not as members of the EU, but as close friends of both
Turkey and Europe. Turkey has been a resolute ally and a responsible
partner in trans-Atlantic and European institutions. Turkey is bound
to Europe by more than the bridges over the Bosporus. Centuries of
shared history, culture, and commerce bring you together. Europe
gains by the diversity of ethnicity, tradition and faith — it is not
diminished by it. And Turkish membership would broaden and strengthen
Europe’s foundation once more.

Now, of course, Turkey has its own responsibilities. And you’ve made
important progress towards membership. But I also know that Turkey
has pursued difficult political reforms not simply because it’s good
for EU membership, but because it’s right for Turkey.

In the last several years, you’ve abolished state security courts,
you’ve expanded the right to counsel. You’ve reformed the penal
code and strengthened laws that govern the freedom of the press and
assembly. You’ve lifted bans on teaching and broadcasting Kurdish,
and the world noted with respect the important signal sent through
a new state Kurdish television station.

These achievements have created new laws that must be implemented,
and a momentum that should be sustained. For democracies cannot be
static — they must move forward. Freedom of religion and expression
lead=2 0to a strong and vibrant civil society that only strengthens the
state, which is why steps like reopening Halki Seminary will send such
an important signal inside Turkey and beyond. An enduring commitment
to the rule of law is the only way to achieve the security that comes
from justice for all people. Robust minority rights let societies
benefit from the full measure of contributions from all citizens.

I say this as the president of a country that not very long ago
made it hard for somebody who looks like me to vote, much less be
president of the United States. But it is precisely that capacity to
change that enriches our countries. Every challenge that we face is
more easily met if we tend to our own democratic foundation. This
work is never over. That’s why, in the United States, we recently
ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed.

That’s why we prohibited — without exception or equivocation — the
use of torture. All of us have to change. And sometimes change is hard.

Another issue that confronts all democracies as they move to the future
is how we deal with the past. The United States is still working
through some of our own darker periods in our history. Facing the
Washington Monument that I spoke of is a memorial of Abraham Lincoln,
the man who freed those who were enslaved even after Washington led
our revolution. Our country still struggles with the legacies of
slavery 0D and segregation, the past treatment of Native Americans.

Human endeavor is by its nature imperfect. History is often tragic,
but unresolved, it can be a heavy weight. Each country must work
through its past. And reckoning with the past can help us seize a
better future. I know there’s strong views in this chamber about
the terrible events of 1915. And while there’s been a good deal of
commentary about my views, it’s really about how the Turkish and
Armenian people deal with the past. And the best way forward for the
Turkish and Armenian people is a process that works through the past
in a way that is honest, open and constructive.

We’ve already seen historic and courageous steps taken by Turkish and
Armenian leaders. These contacts hold out the promise of a new day. An
open border would return the Turkish and Armenian people to a peaceful
and prosperous coexistence that would serve both of your nations. So
I want you to know that the United States strongly supports the full
normalization of relations between Turkey and Armenia. It is a cause
worth working towards.

It speaks to Turkey’s leadership that you are poised to be the only
country in the region to have normal and peaceful relations with all
the South Caucasus nations. And to advance that peace, you can play a
constructive role in helping to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,
which has continued for far too long.

Advancing peace=2 0also includes the disputes that persist in the
Eastern Mediterranean. And here there’s a cause for hope. The two
Cypriot leaders have an opportunity through their commitment to
negotiations under the United Nations Good Offices Mission. The United
States is willing to offer all the help sought by the parties as they
work towards a just and lasting settlement that reunifies Cyprus into
a bi-zonal and bi-communal federation.

These efforts speak to one part of the critical region that surrounds
Turkey. And when we consider the challenges before us, on issue after
issue, we share common goals.

In the Middle East, we share the goal of a lasting peace between
Israel and its neighbors. Let me be clear: The United States strongly
supports the goal of two states, Israel and Palestine, living side
by side in peace and security. That is a goal shared by Palestinians,
Israelis and people of goodwill around the world. That is a goal that
the parties agreed to in the road map and at Annapolis. That is a
goal that I will actively pursue as president of the United States.

We know the road ahead will be difficult. Both Israelis and
Palestinians must take steps that are necessary to build confidence
and trust. Both Israelis and Palestinians, both must live up to the
commitments they have made. Both must overcome long-standing passions
and the politics of the moment to make progress towards a secure and
lasting peace.

The United States and Turkey can help the Palestinians and Israelis
make this journey. Like the United States, Turkey has been a friend
and partner in Israel’s quest for security. And like the United
States, you seek a future of opportunity and statehood for the
Palestinians. So now, working together, we must not give into pessimism
and mistrust. We must pursue every opportunity for progress, as you’ve
done by supporting negotiations between Syria and Israel. We must
extend a hand to those Palestinians who are in need, while helping
them strengthen their own institutions. We must reject the use of
terror, and recognize that Israel’s security concerns are legitimate.

The peace of the region will also be advanced if Iran forgoes any
nuclear weapons ambitions. Now, as I made clear in Prague yesterday,
no one is served by the spread of nuclear weapons, least of all
Turkey. You live in a difficult region and a nuclear arm race would
not serve the security of this nation well. This part of the world
has known enough violence. It has known enough hatred. It does not
need a race for an ever-more powerful tool of destruction.

Now, I have made it clear to the people and leaders of the Islamic
Republic of Iran that the United States seeks engagement based on
mutual interest and mutual respect. We want Iran to play its rightful
role in the community of nations. Iran is a great civilization. We want
them=2 0to engage in the economic and political integration that brings
prosperity and security. But Iran’s leaders must choose whether they
will try to build a weapon or build a better future for their people.

So both Turkey and the United States support a secure and united
Iraq that does not serve as a safe haven for terrorists. I know there
were differences about whether to go to war. There were differences
within my own country, as well. But now we must come together as we
end this war responsibly, because the future of Iraq is inseparable
from the future of the broader region. As I’ve already announced,
and many of you are aware, the United States will remove our combat
brigades by the end of next August, while working with the Iraqi
government as they take responsibility for security. And we will work
with Iraq, Turkey, and all Iraq’s neighbors, to forge a new dialogue
that reconciles differences and advances our common security.

Make no mistake, though: Iraq, Turkey and the United States face a
common threat from terrorism. That includes the al-Qaida terrorists
who have sought to drive Iraqis apart and destroy their country. That
includes the PKK.

There is no excuse for terror against any nation.

As president, and as a NATO ally, I pledge that you will have
our support against the terrorist activities of the PKK or anyone
else. These efforts will be strengthened by the continued work to
build ties o f cooperation between Turkey, the Iraqi government,
and Iraq’s Kurdish leaders, and by your continued efforts to promote
education and opportunity and democracy for the Kurdish population
here inside Turkey.

Finally, we share the common goal of denying al-Qaida a safe haven in
Pakistan or Afghanistan. The world has come too far to let this region
backslide, and to let al-Qaida terrorists plot further attacks. That’s
why we are committed to a more focused effort to disrupt, dismantle
and defeat al-Qaida. That is why we are increasing our efforts to
train Afghans to sustain their own security, and to reconcile former
adversaries. That’s why we are increasing our support for the people
of Afghanistan and Pakistan, so that we stand on the side not only
of security, but also of opportunity and the promise of a better life.

Turkey has been a true partner. Your troops were among the first in
the International Security Assistance Force. You have sacrificed
much in this endeavor. Now we must achieve our goals together. I
appreciate that you’ve offered to help us train and support Afghan
security forces and expand opportunity across the region. Together,
we can rise to meet this challenge like we have so many before.

I know there have been difficulties these last few years. I know that
the trust that binds the United States and Turkey has been strained,
and I know that strain is shared in many places where the Muslim fai
th is practiced. So let me say this as clearly as I can: The United
States is not, and will never be, at war with Islam.

In fact, our partnership with the Muslim world is critical not just in
rolling back the violent ideologies that people of all faiths reject,
but also to strengthen opportunity for all its people.

I also want to be clear that America’s relationship with the Muslim
community, the Muslim world, cannot, and will not, just be based
upon opposition to terrorism. We seek broader engagement based on
mutual interest and mutual respect. We will listen carefully, we will
bridge misunderstandings, and we will seek common ground. We will
be respectful, even when we do not agree. We will convey our deep
appreciation for the Islamic faith, which has done so much over the
centuries to shape the world — including in my own country. The United
States has been enriched by Muslim Americans. Many other Americans
have Muslims in their families or have lived in a Muslim-majority
country — I know, because I am one of them.

Above all, above all we will demonstrate through actions our commitment
to a better future. I want to help more children get the education
that they need to succeed. We want to promote health care in places
where people are vulnerable. We want to expand the trade and investment
that can bring prosperity for all people. In the months ahead, I will
present specific20programs to advance these goals. Our focus will be
on what we can do, in partnership with people across the Muslim world,
to advance our common hopes and our common dreams. And when people
look back on this time, let it be said of America that we extended
the hand of friendship to all people.

There’s an old Turkish proverb: "You cannot put out fire with flames."

America knows this. Turkey knows this. There’s some who must be met
by force, they will not compromise. But force alone cannot solve
our problems, and it is no alternative to extremism. The future must
belong to those who create, not those who destroy. That is the future
we must work for, and we must work for it together.

I know there are those who like to debate Turkey’s future. They
see your country at the crossroads of continents, and touched by
the currents of history. They know that this has been a place where
civilizations meet, and different peoples come together. They wonder
whether you will be pulled in one direction or another.

But I believe here is what they don’t understand: Turkey’s greatness
lies in your ability to be at the center of things. This is not where
East and West divide — this is where they come together.

In the beauty of your culture. In the richness of your history. In
the strength of your democracy. In your hopes for tomorrow.

I am honored to stand here with you — to look forw ard to the future
that we must reach for together — and to reaffirm America’s commitment
to our strong and enduring friendship. Thank you very much. Thank
you. Thank you.

U.S. Recognition Of Genocide To Provide Unprecedented Momentum To

U.S. RECOGNITION OF GENOCIDE TO PROVIDE UNPRECEDENTED MOMENTUM TO TURKEY-ARMENIA DIALOGUE

Yerkir
06.04.2009 12:45

Yerevan (Yerkir) – On April 3, 2009, more than 342 European -Armenian
organizations signed a letter to President Obama, before his visit to
Turkey, inviting the U.S. President to recognize the Armenian Genocide,
reported the European Armenian Federation (EAFJD).

The letter says:

"Dear Mr. President,

In January 2008, you declared your firm conviction "that the
Armenian Genocide is not an allegation, a personal opinion, or a
point of view, but rather a widely documented fact supported by an
overwhelming body of historical evidence." You further said that the
facts of the Armenian Genocide are undeniable emphasizing that "an
official policy that calls on diplomats to distort the historical
facts is an untenable policy". In September and October 2008, you
confirmed your commitment to support the adoption of the Armenian
Genocide resolution in Congress. You also affirmed: "As President,
I will recognize the Armenian Genocide." Mr. President, as Europeans
of Armenian descent, we salute you for these wise, unwavering,
forward-looking and courageous statements.

Europeans hail with hope and enthusiasm these positions rooted in
sound moral principles and consider the universal recognition of the
Armenian Genocide a moral requirement and – given the sad repetition of
mass crimes20such as in Darfur today – an urgent political imperative
for all mankind.

Mr. President, we cannot overlook the efforts, presently under way,
by entities that do not share your vision of humanity and that
aim to prevent your administration from pursuing these progressive
policies which would restore the leading role of the United States
in this vital field. In this regard, your impending visit to Turkey
has profound symbolism that will not be lost to Europeans who are
currently weighing the moral and political cost of the proposed
Turkish membership in the European Union.

Given the mission of change that your presidency represents and given
your principled stance, we would like to assure you that:

– The European Armenians, as well as the large democratic mainstream of
Europe’s civil society, will continue to strongly oppose Turkey’s
membership in the EU for as long as the Turkish state denies
the Armenian Genocide, promotes racism and pursues a policy of
discrimination towards its minorities.

– The commitment you have made to recognize, as President, the Armenian
Genocide and to support the passage of the Armenian Genocide resolution
in Congress will not only set the record straight, but also it will
unleash the momentum of true change and democratization inside Turkey;
a momentum which must lead to an ultimate recognition of this mass
crime by Turkey itself.

– The U.S. recognition will20also provide an unprecedented momentum to
the process of dialogue between Turkey and Armenia. It will make clear
that denial of this crime against humanity will no longer be supported
and that the way forward will definitely require of Turkey and of
all concerned in the region a fundamental commitment to just peace.

In contrast, we are convinced that any retreat by the United States
at this defining moment would be interpreted by genocide-perpetrating
governments as full license to continue their bloody acts and criminal
complicities, as witnessed in Turkey’s recent support for the Sudanese
president who is under arrest warrant by the International Criminal
Court.

For this reason, now more than ever, Europeans are united in their
support for you in your Wilsonian resolution to recognize, this April
24th, the Armenian Genocide and to quickly advance a vote for the
resolutions in the House of Representatives and the Senate of the
United States."

Obama, Sarkozy Clash Over Turkey’s EU Bid =?x-unknown?q?_bid?=

OBAMA, SARKOZY CLASH OVER TURKEY’S EU BID

PanARMENIAN.Net
06.04.2009 10:48 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ U.S. President Barack Obama urged the European Union
on Sunday to accept Turkey as a full member of the 27-nation bloc,
in remarks rejected outright by France and met coolly by Germany.

The disagreement was a rare outward sign of divergence at an
EU-U.S. summit stage-managed to relaunch transatlantic ties that were
strained under the Bush administration and which both sides are now
eager to mend.

"The United States and Europe must approach Muslims as our friends,
neighbors and partners in fighting injustice, intolerance and violence,
forging a relationship based on mutual respect and mutual interests,"
Obama told the summit.

"Moving forward toward Turkish membership in the EU would be an
important signal of your (EU) commitment to this agenda and ensure that
we continue to anchor Turkey firmly in Europe," he told EU leaders.

Turkey has long been seeking to join the bloc, and Obama’s comments
were a reaffirmation of U.S. support for that goal.

But there is resistance among EU states such as Germany and France
to its membership, including among ruling conservatives.

Nicolas Sarkozy said it was up to the EU member states to decide
on Turkish entry and reiterated his opposition. "I have always been
opposed to this entry," he told France’s TF1 television.

"I still am and I think I can say that the immense majority of member
states shares the position of France," he said.

"Turkey is a very great country, an ally of Europe, an ally of the
United States. It will stay a privileged partner. My position hasn’t
changed and it won’t change," he said, Reuters reported.