New Ambassador of Bulgaria presents credentials to Armenian President

Save

Share

 14:27,

YEREVAN, APRIL 28, ARMENPRESS. Newly appointed Ambassador of Bulgaria to Armenia Kalin Anastasov presented his credentials to President Armen Sarkissian, the Armenian President’s Office told Armenpress.

President Sarkissian congratulated the Ambassador on appointment and wished him success. He said the relations between Armenia and Bulgaria have always been built on firm historical-cultural ties. It was stated that next year marks the 30th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between Armenia and Bulgaria.

The Ambassador said he will invest maximum efforts to promote the bilateral ties and the cooperation in different spheres of mutual interest.

In turn President Sarkissian noted that the Armenian-Bulgarian relations have a great potential for development and stated that he is expecting the Ambassador will contribute to its utilization with his active works.

The Ambassador handed over the letter of the Bulgarian President to his Armenian counterpart where he reaffirms the invitation sent to Sarkissian to pay an official visit to Bulgaria.

The Armenian President and the Bulgarian Ambassador also discussed the agenda of the bilateral relations, stating that there are great opportunities for implementing joint programs.

 

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

US President Joe Biden preparing to formally recognize Armenian Genocide

Save

Share

 09:54, 22 April, 2021

YEREVAN, APRIL 22, ARMENPRESS. United States President Joe Biden is preparing to formally recognize the Armenian Genocide on April 24, the New York Times reported citing “officials familiar with the internal debate.”

“The action would signal that the American commitment to human rights outweighs the risk of further fraying the U.S. alliance with Turkey,” the New York Times reported. “A U.S. official with knowledge of the administration’s discussions said Mr. Biden had decided to issue the declaration, and others across the government and in foreign embassies said it was widely expected.”

White House press secretary Jen Psaki declined to comment to the NYT but noted that “the administration would have “more to say” on the topic on [April 24].”

Officially recognizing the Armenian Genocide was a campaign promise of Joe Biden when he was running for office. Biden’s formal recognition would make him the first sitting US President to do so, although President Ronald Reagan made a reference to the Armenian Genocide in a 1981 statement about the Holocaust. “Like the genocide of the Armenians before it, and the genocide of the Cambodians which followed it — and like too many other such persecutions of too many other peoples — the lessons of the Holocaust must never be forgotten” – the 40th President of the United States Ronald Reagan had said in a written statement on April 22, 1981.

News about Biden’s potential recognition of the Armenian Genocide made global headlines.

CNN reported: “President Joe Biden is preparing to declare the massacre of an estimated million or more Armenians under the Ottoman Empire a “genocide” this week, risking a potential fracture with Turkey but fulfilling a campaign pledge to finally use the word as President to describe the mass killings after a series of his predecessors stopped short.”

As a candidate for US President, Biden had said that if he were elected, “I pledge to support a resolution recognizing the Armenian Genocide and will make universal human rights a top priority for my administration.”

“Biden is likely going to use the word “genocide” as part of a statement on April 24 when annual commemorations for the victims are held around the world, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.

Editing by Stepan Kocharyan

Deputy PM rules out ‘Zangezur corridor’ discussion at trilateral task force

Save

Share

 17:02,

YEREVAN, APRIL 16, ARMENPRESS. Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan has ruled out any discussion on a “Zangezur corridor” at the trilateral working group on the unblocking of economic and transport communications – one of the terms of the Karabakh armistice.

“The word ‘corridor’ is commonly used as in transportation route, but I am stressing in this regard that no such issue will be discussed even as a transportation route,” Grigoryan told reporters in response to observations that Azerbaijan is making statements on a “Zangezur corridor”.

He said that the trilateral working group is discussing options of unblocking transport communication, the legal regulations of which will be carried out exclusively upon the CIS legal framework, treaties and conventions which are in force and to which Armenia is a signatory of. “I don’t have a discussion in any other format in that platform.”

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Armenia’s Pashinyan to step down in late April

TASS, Russia
Elections will be held on June 20, the outgoing PM said
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan

© Alexei Druzhinin/Russian Presidential Press and Information Office/TASS

YEREVAN, April 14. /TASS/. Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has said that he will step down during the last ten days of April in order to disband parliament and call early elections.

“I will tender my resignation during the last ten days of April as it was agreed between the parliamentary forces and the president,” Pashinyan told parliament on Wednesday. “In order to adhere to all protocol procedures on the seventh day I will nominate myself for premiership. All other factions will refrain from nominating their candidates, and my party My Step will not elect me as prime minister. Then my faction will nominate me and reject my candidature again. The parliament will be disbanded and elections will be held on June 20,” he said.

Turkey’s thirty-year genocide

MercatorNet
April 8 2021
The Armenian genocide is just one part of a decades-long tragedy, with many lessons to be learned.

The Thirty-Year Genocide: Turkey’s Destruction of Its Christian Minorities, 1894-1924
by Benny Morris and Dror Ze’evi
2019, 672 pp

Most students of history are aware of the Armenian Genocide, in which huge numbers of Armenian Christians were slaughtered by Ottoman Turk forces during World War I.  

In recent years, the Israeli historians Benny Morris and Dror Ze’evi sought to follow in the path of many others in investigating what happened during this period.  

Morris and Ze’evi came to believe that what we call the Armenian Genocide constitutes just one awful chapter within a ‘Thirty-Year Genocide’ which destroyed Turkey’s Christian community, and their 2019 book advances this argument.  

In the late 19th century, the population of modern-day Turkey was around 20 percent Christian. Three decades later, that was down to two percent. During the intervening period, between 1.5 and 2.5 million Christians were killed, with many others fleeing or being deported.  

Beginning in 1894, Armenians were targeted in a series of attacks, which set the stage for future and larger-scale atrocities. After the war ended, a new period of hostilities commenced in which the Turkish nationalists renewed their assault on the remaining Christians.  

“The destruction of the Christian communities was the result of deliberate government policy and the will of the country’s Muslim inhabitants,” Morris and Ze’evi argue. “The murders, expulsions, and conversions were ordered by officials and carried out by other officials, soldiers, gendarmes, policemen and, often, tribesmen and the civilian inhabitants of towns and villages. All of this occurred with the active participation of Muslim clerics and the encouragement of the Turkish press.”  

Rather than looking at this as the elimination of one group (the Armenians), the authors focus on the killing and exiling of the vast majority of the Greek Christian population as well as the Assyrians (groups belonging to a variety of Eastern churches, including the Chaldean Catholic Church).  

The enormity of the charge against the Ottoman and Turkish leadership is unquestionable, but the evidence which the authors provide is both compelling and heart-breaking. 

Long before the killing began, Europeans powers were concerned about the treatment of Christians in the decaying Ottoman Empire. 

As the Empire lost its European colonies and was driven back into Asia, anti-Christian animosity grew, as did the intensity of the persecution meted out to Christians by Kurdish tribes and others in the religiously-mixed areas of Eastern Anatolia.  

In 1894, under the sultanate of Abdülhamid II, the first explosion of mass violence resulted in at least 100,000 Armenians being killed in a series of coordinated atrocities directed by Ottoman state officials.  

What happened between 1894 and 1896 was a dress rehearsal for what was to come – although it was almost exclusively directed against Armenians, with other Christians being spared for the time being.  

Christian clergy and churches were especially targeted, and tens of thousands of Armenians were forced to convert to Islam on pain of death. 

As would become a pattern throughout the following decades, Armenian women were raped en masse and many were abducted as slaves.  

The half-hearted protestations of foreign governments aside, the fact that such a blow had been inflicted without any real consequences gave encouragement to those who dreamed of an empire without Christians. 

The reformist Young Turks who came to power in 1908 shared their predecessors’ hatred of Christians, and as the American ambassador in Constantinople Henry Morgenthau later noted, the Ottomans’ entry into the war in 1914 finally gave them the opportunity to start eliminating Armenians. 

Thus began the deportations, where vast columns of Armenian men, women and children were separated and forced to begin death marches into the desert, while being subjected to frequent attack or summary execution along the way.  

The book’s 506 pages are intensely difficult to read because of the seemingly endless series of abuses which the authors have catalogued across a wide geographic area.  

Elsewhere, Greeks were driven out or killed. As with the Armenians, paranoid Turks pointed to the risk that they would ally with the country’s enemies in a time of war.  

However, the slaughter or deportation of almost half a million Assyrian Christians – a thinly dispersed group with no separatist leanings – is definitive proof that the goal of the Turkish leadership was the annihilation of all Christians.  

The killing and deportation of Christians continued after the war under the direction of the Turkish nationalists led by the founder of the modern Turkish state, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. 

Atatürk is often thought to be a secularist, but as the authors show, he too used the language of holy war while directing atrocities against Christians.  

Though not directly implicated in the main genocide of the war years, the attitude of the ‘Father of all Turks’ would become that of the nation as a whole: “Whatever has befallen the non-Muslim elements living in our country is the result of the policies of separatism they pursued in a savage manner, when they allowed themselves to be made tools of foreign intrigues and abused their privileges.”  

Being Jewish, the authors are well-placed to assess the similarities between this genocide and that carried out by the Nazis. The reluctance of Turkish society to acknowledge these crimes – in sharp contrast to the experience of modern Germany – could be traced back to the active involvement which countless Turkish civilians had in the killings. 

Turkish ongoing genocide denial and the blaming of victims which Atatürk engaged in can also explain further acts of aggression against the tiny Christian minority since the 1920s.  

There are many other lessons which this chilling work can teach us.  

The history of the ‘Thirty-Year Genocide’ shows how low-level anti-Christian persecution can be dramatically escalated to the point where it poses an existential threat.  

It demonstrates the urgent need for what Pope Francis calls the “ecumenism of blood.” A group making up 20% of the population could have resisted more effectively had they worked together, and had other Christians not overlooked the anti-Armenian outrages which were the first salvo in a broader war.  

Politically, Ottoman Turkey’s genocidal policies are a rebuke to those who make a false equivalence between the opposing sides in WW1 (British forces succeeded in recovering around half of the kidnapped women and orphans from Turkish homes after the war), while the greater suffering of the Armenians compared to the Greeks suggests that the existence of a national homeland is of paramount importance to persecuted people in need of support – as Professor Yoram Hazony suggests, there may indeed be a moral virtue associated with nationalism.  

The greatest lesson of all is given by the authors, who note that “Thirty-Year Genocide can be seen as the most dramatic and significant chapter in the de-Christianization of the Middle East during the past two centuries,” a process which “is today nearing completion, as is the de-Christianization, demographically speaking, of Syria, Iraq and Palestine.”   

This too has passed without serious comment, and the fact that it has taken two Jewish academics to draw attention to the planned destruction of Turkey’s Christian communities a century ago is telling.  

“Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?” Adolf Hitler is said to have asked, as he plotted the extermination of another tribe, the one which has produced these two outstanding historians. 

In today’s world, who, we might ask, speaks of the persecution which Christians endure, particularly in the region which is the cradle of the Faith?  

Benny Morris and Dror Ze’evi have shown where this persecution can lead, and it is time to take the threat seriously.

James Bradshaw works for an international consulting firm based in Dublin, and has a background in journalism and public policy. Outside of work, he writes for a number of publications, on topics including… More by James Bradshaw

Return of prisoners, NK status: ‘recipe’ for trust in region from Armenian FM

JAM News
March 30 2021
    JAMnews, Yerevan

Return of prisoners and the status of Nagorno-Karabakh

The return of Armenian prisoners still held in Azerbaijan since the end of the second Karabakh war, and the decision of the status of Nagorno-Karabakh can become an important precondition for the formation of an atmosphere of trust and stability in the region.

Foreign Minister of Armenia Ara Ayvazyan stated this on March 29 at a meeting of the parliamentary commission on external relations.

The minister also spoke about the role of Russia during the hostilities in Karabakh in the fall of 2020, about the aggressive policy of Turkey and the international recognition of the Armenian genocide in the Ottoman Empire.


  • Has Armenia’s economy ‘almost recovered’? Minister expects double-digit growth by end of year
  • Armenian officials receive millions of dollars in bonuses

Prisoners and NK status

In order to finally resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the minister believes, it is necessary to restore an atmosphere of trust:

“But the atmosphere of trust is not immediately restored. For this, it is necessary that the issue of the return of our prisoners of war and held civilians be resolved. This will be a really positive step on the part of our neighboring country.”

Ara Ayvazyan stated that the whole region has now entered a period of new challenges, in connection with which it is necessary to strengthen cooperation with partners interested in stability, security and peace. He stressed the importance of the co-chairmanship of the OSCE Minsk Group, “which will be able to lead the peace process on the basis of principles and elements developed over the years.”

Minister Ayvazyan also stated that in the new situation in the region, Armenia has already developed its own approaches and submitted them to the OSCE Ministerial Council:

“They call for a decision on the status of Artsakh based on the realization of the right to self-determination, ensuring the comprehensive security of the people of Artsakh, de-occupation of the territories of Artsakh occupied by Azerbaijan.”

“Artsakh cannot be a part of Azerbaijan”

The minister believes that the position of Azerbaijan during and after the hostilities showed international structures that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is not just a territorial dispute between Armenia and Azerbaijan:

“This is about preventing the implementation of the next genocide program. Now, when various international organizations and countries observe the complete eviction of Armenians in the territories under the control of Azerbaijan, see how our historical and cultural heritage is being destroyed, how inhumanely Armenian captives are treated, I think they realize that Artsakh cannot be a part of Azerbaijan.”

“The war in Karabakh was stopped by the efforts of Russia”

Ara Ayvazyan stated that Armenia is following the new relations between Russia and Turkey, which does not stop its aggressive rhetoric towards Armenia.

At the same time, the minister expressed confidence that Russia, which is a strategic ally, “as a guarantor of Armenia’s security, will fulfill its obligations if necessary.”

Ayvazyan also stressed that the war in Karabakh was stopped by the efforts of Russia. However, at the same time, the minister does not believe that Armenia and its security are completely dependent on Russia.

International recognition of the Armenian genocide in the Ottoman Empire

“What has happened in recent months [speaks of the military actions in Karabakh and Turkey’s involvement in them as an ally of Azerbaijan] once again reminded the rest of the countries that impunity for the Armenian genocide encourages the repetition of such crimes,” the Foreign Minister said.

In his words, the recognition of the events at the beginning of the last century in the Ottoman Empire as genocide against Armenians remains one of the important directions of the agenda of Armenian diplomacy.

The minister was forced to talk about this, as recently Armenia has been actively discussing the issue of unblocking communications in the region and normalizing relations with Turkey.

In particular, the secretary of the Security Council of Armenia Armen Grigoryan in an interview with the Public TV channel recently stated that it is necessary to “adjust the approaches” of Armenia.

This statement caused a sharp reaction in the country, it was perceived in society as a reason to talk about Yerevan’s refusal to pursue the international recognition of the Armenian Genocide.

The MPs asked the minister if there are any negotiations with Turkey at the moment.

Ara Ayvazyan reminded them that the official position of Armenia on foreign policy is formed and voiced only by the Prime Minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs. He stated that he is not aware of any formats in which meetings, consultations or negotiations with official Ankara can take place.

Armenian Foreign Minister Ara Aivazyan


Toponyms and terminology used in the publications, and views, opinions and strategies they contain do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of JAMnews or any employees thereof. JAMnews reserves the right to delete comments it considers to be offensive, or otherwise unacceptable.

Armenia parliament deputy speaker: I am interested in the 42% who are disappointed with politics

News.am, Armenia

YEREVAN. – I am not interested in the [popularity] rating of the second, third and first presidents of Armenia; I am interested in the 42% who are disappointed with politics and do not want to support anyone. Alen Simonyan, the National Assembly (NA) vice speaker and member of the My Step ruling bloc of Armenia, on Wednesday told this to reporters in the NA, referring to the reports that after the recent Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) war second President Robert Kocharyan’s popularity rating has risen and he might replace Nikol Pashinyan as the Prime Minister.

“As for the rest, go to the nearest province, the nearest village, and give the name of the person you mentioned; but I advise [you] not to turn off the car engine while giving that name. The person you mentioned, when they had the levers of power, almost all the TV channels, could not win the elections even at that time,” he said.

Simonyan informed that they have already started their pre-election work, including the modification of their electoral lists.

To the question whether there is already an idea about their future electoral list, whether there are any current MPs who will not be put on the electoral list of the ruling force, the NA vice speaker responded: “There are MPs who left [the ruling bloc]; it is natural that I consider it impossible to work with them. And I consider their work today illegitimate. For the rest, I can say that most of our partners will continue their work. Some may continue in the executive. But our [political] team, which remained strong, will continue to work. Everything within us is more than smooth.”

Also, he did not rule out the possibility of new people on their electoral list, but did not give names.

Alen Simonyan added that in his opinion, it would be right if the ruling force run in the forthcoming snap parliamentary elections under the name of Civil Contract Party, and not in a bloc.

Beginning a Marriage with Goodbye

March 9 2021
By ICC’s Country Correspondent

Taguhi at her dad’s grave.

03/08/2021 Armenia (International Christian Concern) – A military cemetery rests on a hilltop just outside of Yerevan, the capital of Armenia. Since 1988, Yerablur Pantheon has served as the burial place for ethnic Armenian soldiers who lost their lives defending Nagorno-Karabakh (Armenian: Artsakh). This small country located in the South Caucasus is predominately Armenian Christian, and has been for millennia. But decades of wars, religious genocides, and ethnic cleansing has threatened the existence of Karabakh’s Armenian Christians.

Yerablur is a reminder of this situation. When I asked Vahe Yeprikyan, a young lawyer and patriot of his country, the question “what kind of meaning does Yerablur have for you?”, his answer spoke volumes.

He replied, Yerablur for me is not just a cemetery, and it’s not the voice of death I hear in the silence of the air of this height here. It is the sanctuary of those who fell in love with our homeland for eternity. Fallen heroes like Ishkhan are buried here, but did Ishkhan die? …Who says that life ends when the heart stops beating? It is a lie; the heroes live as long as they are remembered…”

Iskhan Petrosyan was one of the 5 thousand martyrs who died protecting Karabakh from Azerbaijani-Turkish aggression last year. “It’s very hard to speak about my friend Ishkhan thinking he is not with us anymore,” Vahe says emotionally. “He was a man full of optimism with a cheerful and gentle soulseeing the positive side in evil, and always was smiling.”

“We met over dinner just days before the war began in September, had a couple of drinks or two, spoke about our country, statehood, and its future. After these long pleasant hours-long discussions, with a big smile on his face, Ishkhan said his daughter Taguhi (whose name means ‘Queen’ in Armenian) is getting married soon. He was always sentimental speaking about his daughters, and those sentiments became more visible in his eyes filled with a sad gleam: Ishkhan knew somewhere along the line his daughters will get married and move from their parental house,” he continued.

“To make a long story short, it was getting late, and next day was work for both of us, we said good bye promising to see each other over the weekend. Unfortunately, there was no next time. The next Sunday, the war broke out…”

Ishkhan, whose grandparents survived the Armenian genocide in the Ottoman Empire (modern day Turkey), had served in the military decades ago during the first Karabakh war. With this new war, he would again throw himself into the frontline. He bravely went forward to protect his country and his daughters, their future, so that he would not inherit a war to his grandchildren. He wanted to leave for them a peaceful state.

He did not survive, and is buried at Yerablur Pantheon.

Just days ago, his daughter Taguhi was married to her beloved man, just as it was planned. She visited her dad’s grave at Yerablur Pantheon and asked his blessing before the marriage. The bride does not have a wedding bouquet in her hands, instead placing the flowers on her father’s grave under her feet. The smile on the bride’s face talking to her father certainly is not full: grief has fallen on her face and is frozen within her eyes.

“I am sure Ishkhan has the same big smile on his face, looking from above as he had at the night when I saw him the last time,” Vahe concludes.

Rest in peace dear Ishkhan. Your fallen blood will still flow in your grandchildren’s veins.

***

To learn more about how Turkey and Azerbaijan joined together to commit genocide against Armenian Christians in Karabakh, read the report Anatomy of Genocide: Karabakh’s Forty-Four Day War.

 

CivilNet: UNICEF Armenia Representative’s Tenure Ends Abruptly

CIVILNET.AM

09 Mar, 2021 07:03

By Varak Ghazarian

Armenia has ended the tenure of Marianne Clark-Hattingh, the UNICEF representative in Armenia, according to the spokeswoman of the Armenian Foreign Ministry Anna Naghdalyan.

“The shortcomings of the UNICEF Representative in Armenia Marianne Clark-Hattingh in the implementation of her mandate and her non-cooperative style of work were problematic for the Armenian side. The UN Resident Coordinator and UNICEF representatives were informed about the above-mentioned decision,” Naghdalyan stated. 

Clark-Hattingh left Armenia “in a hurry,” due to “the head of the UNICEF Armenia office not presenting herself correctly,” according to Sputnik Armenia.

Zara Sargsyan, Head Communication at UNICEF Armenia, denied reports that Clark-Hattingh left Armenia “in a hurry.” According to Sargsyan, UNICEF has already named a new representative in Armenia and is now awaiting approval from the Armenian Foreign Ministry.

According to various telegram channels, Armenian authorities declared the Head of the UNICEF Armenia office a “persona non grata” because she spied for Azerbaijan and Great Britain.

The General Prosecutor’s Office of Armenia stated they do not have any information about Clark-Hattingh’s alleged espionage for Azerbaijan while she was in office. However, the General Prosecutor’s Office stated that they will look into the allegations.

The UNICEF headquarters in New York has yet to issue a statement regarding the recent development, but the decision to remove Clark-Hattingh was agreed upon by the executives of UNICEF.

Clark-Hattingh took over UNICEF office in Armenia in July 2020. She was UNICEF’s representative in Malaysia from 2016-2020. Before coming to Armenia, she worked for UNICEF in Malaysia, Somalia, Ghana, Madagascar, and several other countries.