Cynthia Lennon And Pattie Boyd To Visit Yerevan

CYNTHIA LENNON AND PATTIE BOYD TO VISIT YEREVAN

-09-cynthia-lennon-and-pattie-boyd-to-visit-yereva n
Friday October 09, 2009

Will take part in the Grand Opening of the Cafesjian Center for
the Arts

Yerevan – The Cafesjian Center for the Arts announced that on November
8, Cynthia Lennon and Pattie Boyd – former wives of Beatles John Lennon
and George Harrison – will visit Yerevan to take part in a series of
special events marking the grand opening of the center. Lennon and
Boyd will share the stage for the first time ever, and lend intimate
insight into their husbands’ extraordinary lives and music. A book
signing of John by Cynthia Lennon and Wonderful Tonight by Pattie
Boyd – who was also married to the blues musician Eric ­Clapton –
will follow the interview.

"The Beatles were the single most influential cultural phenomenon of
the 20th century," Dr. Michael De Marsche, the executive director of
the Cafesjian Center for the Arts, stated. "Their music was one of the
first things to blast through the Iron Curtain, and for many people,
especially the generation of the 1960s, the Beatles represent freedom."

The interview will take place in the Center’s new Special Events
Auditorium. Lennon and Boyd will take the stage and answer questions
from Dr. De Marsche. The afternoon will conclude with questions from
the audience.

An exhibition of Pattie Boyd’s photography, titled, "Pattie Boyd:
Yesterday and Today," will open November 8 and will be on view until
January 31, 2010. The exhibition lends an intimate view into the
lives of George Harrison, Eric Clapton, the Beatles, and Pattie Boyd
herself. This unique collection of photographs, representing 40 years
of work, has garnered attention from art critics internationally,
and has toured two continents.

The Grand Opening Celebration for the Cafesjian Center for the Arts
will begin on the evening of November 7 with a spectacular fireworks
display near the Cascade monument. The Cascade has been completely
transformed into one of the world’s outstanding contemporary art
centers. The center had invited the public to view all the renovations
that have taken place inside the Cascade and to enjoy an outstanding
schedule of exhibitions, visiting lecturers, book-signings, concerts
and events on Sunday, November 8.

[email protected]

http://www.reporter.am/go/article/2009-10

Serge Sargsyan Did Not Discuss Return Of Territories

SERGE SARGSYAN DID NOT DISCUSS RETURN OF TERRITORIES

lrahos15514.html
14:44:57 – 12/10/2009

Serge Sargsyan, at the airport of Zvartnots Yerevan, before leaving for
Moscow, said that he discussed the question on Karabakh status and the
question on the corridor linking Armenia with Karabakh but no question
on return of lands was discussed. Serge Sargsyan said if Aliyev is
dissatisfied with the process of negotiations, he cannot help him.

On these days, Aliyev stated that there was an arrangement on
withdrawing the Armenian army. In this connection, Serge Sargsyan
said that Aliyev was mistaken not noting the place and the time of
that negotiation.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/politics-

NKR:Monitoring

MONITORING

Ministry of Foreign Affairs
2009-10-12 14:44
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic

On October 12, in accordance with the earlier achieved agreement with
the NKR authorities the OSCE mission conducted regular monitoring of
the line of contact of Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijani Armed Forces
near Horadiz settlement.

>From the positions of the NKR Defense Army the monitoring was conducted
by Coordinator of the OSCE Office, Lieutenant-Colonel Imre Palatinus
(Hungary) and Field Assistants of the Personal Representative of
the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Vladimir Chuntulov(Bulgaria) and Zhaslan
Nurtazin(Kazakhstan).

The monitoring group from the Azerbaijani side was headed by Personal
Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-office Andrzey Kasprzyk.

The monitoring passed in accordance with the planned schedule. No
violation of cease-fire regime was registered.

The monitoring mission from the Karabakhi side was accompanied by
representatives of the NKR Ministries of Defense and Foreign Affairs.

Turkey Sidesteps Obstacle to Armenia Pact

Turkey Sidesteps Obstacle to Armenia Pact

Wall Street Journal
EUROPE NEWS OCTOBER 8, 2009

By MARC CHAMPION in Istanbul and NICHOLAS BIRCH in Kars, Turkey

Turkey has dropped a key condition to signing an agreement Saturday that
would reopen its border with Armenia and establish diplomatic relations
between the two nations, which have been divided for generations by a
dispute over genocide.

"The agreement will be signed on Oct. 10," Turkish Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan told The Wall Street Journal — provided, he said, that
Armenia doesn’t ask for changes to the text.

Supporters of the pact — which include the U.S. and the European Union —
say they hope the change could trigger a virtuous cycle, opening up and
stabilizing a region that is increasingly important for oil and gas transit
and last year saw a war between Russia and Georgia.

But in Kars, the Turkish city closest to the Armenian border, skeptics point
to a concrete monument to unity between the two peoples to show why an
embrace between neighbors is far from certain.

The statue of two 100-foot tall human figures, standing face to face on a
hill above the city, is incomplete: A giant hand that would join the figures
was never attached.

It lies abandoned on the gravel below.

The monument, built last year, is now under threat of destruction.

"Small-minded people blocked the monument and they will block the peace
process too," says Naif Alibeyoglu, who had the statue built when he was
mayor of Kars. His 10 years in office ended in March. "You wait and see,
[the deal] will end up like my statue: a statue without hands."

Supporters of the agreement, however, have sidestepped a significant hurdle:
Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan said in an interview Sunday that the signing
wasn’t dependent on progress at talks this week between the leaders of
Armenia and Azerbaijan over their territorial conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh.

It was because of Armenia’s effective occupation of the ethnic Armenian
enclave in Azerbaijan that Turkey closed the border in 1993.

An earlier attempt to sign the protocol in April stalled when Mr. Erdogan
said it could go forward only after the Karabakh conflict was resolved.

The parliaments of Armenia and Turkey need to ratify the protocol for it to
take force, something Mr. Erdogan said he couldn’t guarantee, as
parliamentarians in Ankara would have a free vote in a secret ballot.

Mr. Erdogan also said the two processes — a resolution of the Karabakh
conflict and rapprochement between Turkey and Armenia — remain linked, and
that a positive outcome at this week’s talks, to be held in Moldova, would
help overall.

Turkish officials have continued to indicate that the border could take
longer to open than the three months set out in the three-page protocol.

The Turkish leader said the only obstacle to signing the deal Saturday would
come if Armenia seeks to alter the text.

"This is perhaps the most important point — that Armenia should not allow
its policies to be taken hostage by the Armenian diaspora," Mr. Erdogan
said. Much of Armenia’s large diaspora opposes the protocol.

A spokesman for Armenian President Serge Sarkisian declined to comment on
whether Armenia would seek changes to the protocol.

He said the government would soon make a statement on "steps" concerning the
protocol.

Mr. Sarkisian has spent the week on a multination tour to explain his
position to diaspora groups, some of which have protested the pact.

Opponents say it will be used by Turkey to reduce international pressure on
it to recognize as genocide the 1915 slaughter of up to 1.5 million ethnic
Armenians in what was then the Ottoman Empire.

The protocol would recognize the current frontier between Turkey and
Armenia, and would set up a joint commission to review issues of history,
likely to include the 1915 massacres. Turkey says they were collateral
deaths during what amounted to civil war during World War I.

Mr. Alibeyoglu, the former Kars mayor, worked hard to improve relations
between his city — a former Armenian capital that changed hands and
populations several times over centuries — and its natural hinterland, the
Caucasus.

He invited Armenian, Azeri and Georgian artists to festivals, signed
sister-city agreements with cities across the region and, in 2004, gathered
50,000 signatures for a petition demanding the opening of the
Turkish-Armenian border.

Kars would stand to benefit from the ability to trade across a border 25
miles away by train and truck.

But some 20% of the city’s population are ethnic Azerbaijanis, who consider
opening the border while Armenia remains in control of a fifth of
Azerbaijan’s territory a betrayal.

Sculptor Mehmet Aksoy says he abandoned his plan to run water down the
statues to pool as tears, because nationalists complained these would be
tears of Armenian rejoicing at reclaiming territory.

Indeed, one complaint of nationalist opponents of the protocol in Armenia is
that the treaty’s recognition of current borders would prevent any future
claim to the swathe of Eastern Turkey that Armenia won in a 1920 treaty,
only to lose it again in the 1921 Treaty of Kars between Russia and Turkey.

"Why is one figure standing with its head bowed, as if ashamed?" asks Oktay
Aktas, an ethnic Azeri and local head of the Nationalist Action Party, or
MHP, who wants the statue torn down. "Turkey has nothing to be ashamed of."

In fact, the two figures stand ramrod straight.

On the other side of the border, Armenian nationalists have taken to the
streets to protest the pact with Turkey.

Turkey and Armenia are "like two neighbors who do not know each other," says
Mr. Alibeyoglu, who in 2004 organized a petition to open the border. "Is he
a terrorist? A mafioso? We needed to break the ice."

Nationalists applied to Turkey’s Commission for Monuments to get
construction of the monument stopped, on the basis that a viewing platform
was built without permission.

In November, the commission ordered that it be demolished.

The monument’s fate awaits a decision from the central government in Ankara.

South Caucasus Railway To Reach New Level Of Track Facilities Develo

SOUTH CAUCASUS RAILWAY TO REACH NEW LEVEL OF TRACK FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT BY 2015

ArmInfo
2009-10-09 13:11:00

ArmInfo. South Caucasus Railway is going to reach new level of track
facilities development by 2015, which will be directed to radical
raising of reliability of the track in case of running of heavy
trains at a high speed, engineer general of South Caucasus Railway
[SCR] company, Sergey Harutyunyan, said. He also added that to
raise labour capacity by 2015 they are going to minimize hand work
at trackworks, including thanks to using of an electrical tool as
well. Harutyunyan said that within the frames of the programme they
are going to restore the railway sectors which were idle for a long
period of time: Dilijan-Ijevan (54 km long) and Gyumri-Akhurian (13
km long). The total of 420 mln roubles investments are foreseen for
fulfillment of these two programmes.

Chisinau Hosts Summit Of CIS Foreign Ministers

CHISINAU HOSTS SUMMIT OF CIS FOREIGN MINISTERS

armradio.am
08.10.2009 14:14

The heads of diplomacies of all the 11 member states of the
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) are in Chisinau today to
participate in the summit of the CIS Council of Foreign Ministers in
the afternoon.

The summit’s agenda covers 20 up-to-date issues from various sectors. A
special subject is Georgia’s further cooperation with the commonwealth,
after it gave in its CIS membership on 18 August 2009.

On 9 October, Chisinau will host the summit of CIS heads of states,
which is expected to be attended by seven out of 11 CIS presidents. The
other countries will be represented by prime ministers. Moldova
holds the CIS chairmanship this year and is to hand it to the Russian
Federation.

The Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan Serzh Sargsyan and
Ilham Aliyev are scheduled to meet on the margins of the CIS
summit. Press-secretary of the Russian President Natalya Timakova told
reporters that Russian President Dmitry Medvedev will hold trilateral
meeting with Azerbaijani and Armenian Presidents during the visit
to Moldova.

Alexander Arzumanyan: There Can Be No Closed Border Sin Civilized Re

ALEXANDER ARZUMANYAN: THERE CAN BE NO CLOSED BORDER SIN CIVILIZED RELATIONS
Siranush Muradyan

"Radiolur""
08.10.2009 18:25

"The Armenian-Turkish border should be opened," declared ex-Foreign
Minister Alexander Arzumanyan, representative of the Armenian National
Congress. According to him, there can be no closed border sin civilized
relations.

"I definitely stand for opening of the border, but I’m worried about
the conditions under which it is going to be opened," he said.

Alexander Arzumanyan considers that Armenia is pressured to normalize
relations with Turkey. "Who is interested in the development of the
Armenian-Turkish relations? It’s the United States that is greatly
interested in the region," he said.

The Government’s Bushel

THE GOVERNMENT’S BUSHEL
Hakob Badalyan

hos15424.html
11:47:42 – 06/10/2009

The discussion of the Armenian and Turkish protocols, sure, if
this process maybe called a discussion because except oppositional
arguments no essential anti-argument is presented by the government,
is passing on a plane exceptionally regarding the extern field,
excluding of course the tale on price decline that the government
tells the Armenian citizens.

The discussion of the Armenian-Turkish protocols skillfully avoids the
issues in Armenia on democracy, legality, right and free speech. They
seem not to have anything in common with the reality present in the
Armenian and Turkish normalization process. While, these problems
are not only the cause of the current image of the process but they
will also accompany all possible developments because the result or
consequence of any development in connection with the Armenian and
Turkish process will be determined by them.

The approach that the quality of the foreign policy is tangibly
determined by the quality of the home life is not just a theoretical
affirmation. The point is not even the legitimacy or non-legitimacy
of the government. The point is not that if Serge Sargsyan was a
legitimate president he would not have taken up a harmful scenario of
the Armenian and Turkish normalization process. Maybe Serge Sargsyan
really affirms his ideas being sure of his rightness and makes his
steps believing in the rightness of them. But the point is that
when in a country democratic, legal mechanisms work, when there is
possibility of free speech not only through press but also through TV,
it is easier for the society to influence governmental decisions.

In other words, we deal with just, legal election problem. Regardless
we want or not. If the government in a country is not formed by the
will of the citizens but by the wish of the same government, it will
naturally have no reason to doubt its being right. Moreover, the
government starts suspecting all those who doubt its rightness. And
this suspicion of the government has objective grounds because not
depending on the public the government does not believe that any
political force may set hopes on coming to power by the will of the
people but it just tries to make a shift of government deceiving
the society.

In other words, the government measures everything and everyone
by its own bushel because there is no other unit of measure in the
country. During the discussion of the Armenian and Turkish protocols,
the lack of a national unit of measure was felt. Whereas, it is
impossible to find anywhere any other more right unit of measure
than the law and the right. Consequently, the problem is whether the
government policy in this case in relation to the Armenian and Turkish
process is legal. It is legal as much as the process of the formation
of the very government is legal. Perhaps, all the political forces who
indeed are trying to prevent the process full of dangerous development
in result of singing of the protocols have to seek for answers on this
plane and have to turn it into a pro-Armenian course. In the opposite
case, any debate is only legitimating the governmental foreign policy.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments-lra

Libyan Air Force MiG-23 Fighter Crashes At Air Show In Tripoli

LIBYAN AIR FORCE MIG-23 FIGHTER CRASHES AT AIR SHOW IN TRIPOLI

RIA Novosti
14:0707/10/2009

TRIPOLI, October 7 (RIA Novosti) – A Libyan Air Force MiG-23 Flogger
fighter crashed on Wednesday during a demonstration flight at the
Third Libyan Aviation Exhibition.

The aircraft crashed about 2 kilometers from observation platforms
at the Libyan Aviation Conference & Exhibition, which runs October 4-8.

According to preliminary reports, the pilot died.

Production of the "third-generation" MiG-23 started in 1970 and ended
in 1985 with over 5,000 aircraft built.

Its various modifications are currently operated by several former
Soviet republics and traditional recipients of Soviet arms including
Armenia, Algeria, Angola, Belarus, Cuba, Ethiopia, Kazakhstan, Sri
Lanka, Syria, Turkmenistan, Vietnam and Zimbabwe.