New Government’s Shape To Be Clear By The End Of May

NEW GOVERNMENT’S SHAPE TO BE CLEAR BY THE END OF MAY

Armenpress
May 15 2007

YEREVAN, MAY 15, ARMENPRESS: Eduard Sharmazanov, a press secretary
of the Republican Party, that won the plurality of seats in the
new parliament, said it will start negotiations with other parties
which have also won seats in the parliament, over formation of a new
government after the Central Election Commissions announces the final
results of the weekend polls.

He said what a shape the new government will have will be clear by
May 31. Sharmazanov also praised the May 12 ballot as ‘the best in
Armenia’s recent independent history."

"The results of the elections showed that the majority of people link
the resolution of their problems and their future to the Republican
Party and prime minister Serzh Sarkisian, who is chairman of its
political council… Naturally the Republican Party will nominate Serzh
Sarkisian as its candidate for next year’s presidential election,"
he said, adding, however, that the final say belongs to Sarkisian.

According to preliminary calculation, the Republican Party will control
64-65 mandates in the 131-member National Assembly, which Sharmazanov
said is quite enough for the party not to seek a coalition government..

"However, this is not our goal and the Republican Party is prepared
to cooperate with all those parties who do not look at representation
in the government as an end in itself," he said.

Armenian prime minister’s party takes most votes in parliamentary

Armenian prime minister’s party takes most votes in parliamentary election;
observers note improvements

AVET DEMOURIAN, AP Worldstream
Published: May 14, 2007

The party of Armenia’s prime minister garnered the most votes in
parliamentary elections, officials said, as foreign observers praised
the vote and opposition parties accused authorities of fraud.

Prime Minister Serge Sarkisian’s Republican Party was leading in the
list of five parties topping the 5 percent minimum for seats in the
131-seat National Assembly, the Central Elections Commission said
Sunday.

Observers from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe, meanwhile, commended the vote, saying it was, on the whole,
better than the previous one four years ago.

"The election campaign was dynamic with extensive media
coverage. Election day was calm, with no major incidents reported, but
a few cases of fraud schemes were observed," the OSCE’s election
monitoring team said in a report. "Some procedural problems arose
during the count and tabulation of votes as well as isolated cases of
deliberate falsifications."

The organization also said there were some problems and
inconsistencies in election regulations, and officials were slow to
correct irregularities.

The EU also praised the elections, saying they were "on the whole,
conducted fairly, freely and largely in accordance with the
international commitments which Armenia had entered into."

Central Elections Commission figures said the Republican Party, with
32.8 percent of the vote, was trailed by Prosperous Armenia, with 14.7
percent, and the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, with 12.7
percent. Two other parties, Country of Law and Legacy, got less than
10 percent each, but enough to obtain seats in parliament.

Of the 131 seats, 90 are chosen according to proportions that parties
get nationwide and 41 in single-mandate contests.

Roughly 1.37 million people, or about 60 percent of registered voters,
cast ballots in Saturday’s election, officials said.

"I voted for the authorities because I can now see the possibility of
a better life which they will grant me," said Sarkis Ambartsumian, a
44-year-old scientist.

The Country of Law party, meanwhile, said it had noted "mass election
violations," including bribery and improper balloting and
vote-tallying. The party’s representative to the election commission
refused to sign the final protocol and promised to file suit against
election officials to keep final results from being published in the
official register.

Election officials refused to comment on the allegations.

More than 1,000 opposition party members and activists later rallied
in a Yerevan square, vowing to press their fraud claims.

"They stole our votes again," said Narine Saakian, a 52-year-old
homemaker. "The authorities are becoming more and more cynical with
every passing year in their efforts to enrich themselves at the
expense of simple people. I go to these radical rallies out of
desperation."

Most political observers said Republican Party would likely join with
Prosperous Armenia and Armenian Revolutionary Federation to form a
ruling coalition and return Sarkisian to the post of prime minister.

Prosperous Armenia is a comparatively new player on the political
scene, having been formed in 2004, and its origins are unclear. Some
observers suggest it was formed at the initiative of President Robert
Kocharian as a way to have a counterbalance to the Republican Party.

All the main parties call for addressing economic and social problems,
including finding ways to increase the population of about 2.9
million. The population has dropped sharply in the post-Soviet period
as the birth rate declined and an estimated 900,000 people emigrated,
largely because of economic problems.

The tiny South Caucasus nation has few natural resources and its
economic development is restricted by the closing of its borders with
Azerbaijan and Turkey _ both of which were shut in protest against
ethnic Armenian troops taking control of Nagorno-Karabakh, a territory
in Azerbaijan, during a six-year conflict in the early 1990s.

How BP spent lb45m to win ‘Wild East’ Oil Rights

Hookers, spies, cases full of dollars…how BP spent £45m to win ‘Wild
East’ oil rights

By GLEN OWEN

12th May, 2007

BP executives working for Lord Browne spent millions of pounds on
champagne-fuelled sex parties to help secure lucrative international
oil contracts.

The company also worked with MI6 to help bring about changes in
foreign governments, according to an astonishing account of life
inside the oil giant.

Les Abrahams, who led BP’s successful bid for a multi-million-pound
deal with one of the former Soviet republics, today claims that Browne
– who was forced to resign as chief executive last month after the
collapse of legal proceedings against The Mail on Sunday – presided
over an "anything goes" regime of sexual licence, spying and financial
sweeteners.

High life: Mr Abrahams, left, and another BP executive not linked to
any impropriety with local girls in Azerbaijan

He also claims that Home Secretary John Reid was arrested at gunpoint
on a BP-funded foreign trip for being out on the streets after a
military curfew had been imposed.

Mr Abrahams tells how he spent £45 million in expenses over just four
months of negotiations with Azerbaijan’s state oil company.

Armed with a no-limit company credit card, he ordered supplies of
champagne and caviar to be flown on company jets into the boomtown
capital, Baku, tobe consumed at the "sex parties".

The hospitality continued in London, where prostitutes were hired on
the BP credit card to entertain visiting Azerbaijanis.

Mr Abrahams, an engineer by training, joined BP in 1991, just as the
disintegration of the Soviet Union had triggered a "new gold rush" by
oil multi-nationals seeking a share of the 200 billion barrels of oil
reservesbeneath the Caspian Sea.

While employed by BP, Mr Abrahams says he was persuaded to work for
MI6 by John Scarlett, now head of the service but then its head of
station in Moscow.

He says he was passing information to Scarlett in faxes and at
one-to-one meetings in the Russian capital.

He also claims that BP was working closely with MI6 at the highest
levels to help it to win business in the region and influence the
political complexion of governments.

Mr Abrahams worked for BP’s XFI unit – Exploring Frontiers
International – which specialises in opening new markets in often
unstable parts of the world.

He said Lord Browne, then BP’s head of exploration, allocated a budget
of £45 million to cover the first year’s costs of the Baku operation.

"The order came from Browne’s aides to ‘get them anything they want’.

"By ‘them’, they meant local officials in Azerbaijan," Mr Abrahams
said.

"There were 20 or 30 people working on it at BP head office, and we
soon had a steady stream of executives coming over as negotiators. We
got through the money in just four months – after which it was simply
increased without question."

He described a Wild West world in which oil executives with briefcases
full of dollars rubbed shoulders with mafia members, prostitutes and
fixers and cut their deals in smoke-filled back rooms.

"The BP officials would come out to Baku in groups of five or six,
every week," he said.

"Sometimes I would charter an entire Boeing 757 to carry as few as
seven staff. Their main base was the hard currency bar of the old
Intourist hotel – so named because it accepted only dollars and was
only open to foreigners.

"It was full of prostitutes and many of us, including me, used them on
a regular basis, although we quickly established they all worked for
the KGB.

"If we went back to the rooms, not only were they bugged, but the
girls would quiz us closely about what we were doing and where we were
going, and reported straight back to their handlers.

"Everywhere was bugged, and all the phones were tapped. One of our
executives was recorded saying unflattering things about the
president, andhis comments were played back to us in a meeting with
local state oil company officials.

"We were then told clearly that he was no longer welcome in the
country."

Mr Abrahams helped to forge links with the local officials by throwing
lavish parties. He said the Azerbaijani girls who worked in the BP
office,which occupied a floor of the Sovietskaya hotel, would attend
the parties and routinely provide "sexual favours".

They were also presumed to work for the local intelligence services.

"There was one girl, called Natasha, assigned to teach us Russian, but
it usually ended up as more that that. She would use the intimate
opportunityto ask us questions about what we were up to.

"Caviar and champagne were consumed at the parties, which would start
in the bars but inevitably end with the girls in the rooms.

"We had a company American Express card with no name on it which we
could use to draw out $10,000 a time to pay for entertaining without
ever having to account for it.

"Our local fixer was called ‘Zulfie’, who would help find girls, drink
and occasionally hashish. We always suspected he worked for the KGB,
because he was so well connected.

"A lot of the BP men’s marriages went wrong. Either they ended up with
the local girls, or the wives would find out – often because the girls
would ring their home numbers "by accident".

"I don’t believe that Browne didn’t know everything that was going
on. He came out to Baku on five or six occasions."

Mr Abrahams, who left BP in 1994, said his first marriage buckled
because of his work in Baku. He has since remarried and lives in West
London with his new wife Lana and six-year-old daughter Anastasia. He
now works as an adviser to the EU.

He said BP applied the same laissez-faire attitude to hospitality when
Azerbaijani officials came to the UK during the negotiations.

"I was given a hotline number which connected to a desk in the Foreign
Office. It meant visas could be granted instantly for the Azerbaijanis
and collected on arrival at the airport, rather than taking the usual
several weeks.

"We had bundles of cash to spend on them when they got here, and could
again use the corporate card without restraint.

"We would typically have a dinner at which Lord Browne would be
present, then he would go home and we would head off to somewhere like
the GaslightClub in Piccadilly – where girls would dance topless and
you would get charged £250 for your drink.

"Our guests would usually want girls to go back with
afterwards. Sometimes we could persuade the girls in the clubs, but
more often we would just phone up an escort agency.

"We could charge them straight to the BP Amex card. But it sometimes
became problematic. One group of Khazak Oil officials stripped their
hotel rooms in Aberdeen bare, including the sheets and pillowcases,
and they would usually clear out the minibars wherever they were
staying."

All the entertaining paid off in September 1992 when BP signed a £300
million deal to exploit the Shah Deniz oilfields.

Mr Abrahams says that a key factor in securing the deal was an £8
million payment BP made that year to SOCAR, the state-owned oil
company in Azerbaijan, for the right to use a construction yard on the
edge of the Caspian Sea.

"It was effectively a sweetener to help to secure the deal – and it
worked," he said.

Among the guests at a dinner and ceremony at Baku’s Gulistan Palace to
celebrate the Shah Deniz deal were Lord Browne and Baroness Thatcher.

Mr Abrahams says he was told to ensure that everything ran smoothly
for the event, including meeting Browne’s fastidious requirements.

"I had his favourite brand of water, Hildon, and his preferred foods
flown out in advance, and I made sure money was paid for police
escorts and to circumvent immigration procedures at the airport for
Browne and his entourage.

"That evening, he personally handed me a briefcase containing a cheque
for $30 million (£15million), to close the deal.

"He was so keen to wear a particular shirt, which he had left at the
airport, that I persuaded the chief of police to close off the roads
so his cavalcade could go via the airport to collect it."

In 1993, Mr Abrahams played host to a group of MPs who visited Baku as
guests of BP, including Harold Elletson – then a Tory MP but now an
adviser to the Liberal Democrats – and Home Secretary John Reid, a
Shadow Defence Minister at the time.

"John flew out in the BP Gulfstream jet," he recalls.

"After dinner, we went drinking in the hard currency bar. He was
drinking a lot – this was a year before he gave up for good – and I
grew worried as it got closer to the time of the curfew imposed
because of the tense political situation at the time.

"I said, ‘Come on John, we have to get back to the hotel.’ But as we
left, he was swaying around and being very noisy.

"I urged him not to draw attention to us because we weren’t meant to
be still on the streets. But then a van load of police armed with
Kalashnikovs pulled up and asked us what we were doing.

"He said, ‘I am a British politician…’ I urged him to be quiet, but
then he said to one of the policemen, ‘If you don’t take that f***ing
Kalashnikov out of my face I’m going to stick it up your f***ing
a***.’

"With that, we were arrested and shoved at gunpoint into the back of
the van.

"It was only after I persuaded the driver to go to the hotel to speak
to the intelligence officer there that they released us. John had only
about two hours’ sleep, then was up at 5.30am to fly to the nearby war
zone of Nagorno Karabakh. He was completely hung over."

Some of Mr Abrahams’ most intriguing claims surround the alleged
co-operation between BP and the British intelligence services to
secure a more pro-Western, pro-business regime in the country.

He says the operation, masterminded by Scarlett in Moscow, contributed
to the coup in May 1992 which saw President Ayaz Mutalibov toppled by
Abulfaz Elchibey, and then to a second change a year later which saw
Haydar Aliyevtake power.

Just months after Aliyev was installed, BP signed the so-called
‘contract of the century’, a £5 billion deal which placed BP at the
head of an oil exporting consortium.

John Scarlett, says Mr Abrahams, "approached me very subtly and asked
me to help to gather information for him.

"Because my daily route to the construction yard passed the supply
routes for Nagorno Karabakh, he asked me to report on troop and
weapons movements. And BP’s deputy representative in Russia seemed
very close to the embassy, too.

"BP supported both coups, both through discreet moves and open
political support. Our progress on the oil contracts improved
considerably after the coups."

Subsequently released Turkish secret service documents claimed BP had
discussed an ‘arms for oil’ deal with the assistance of MI6, under
which the company would use intermediaries to supply weapons to
Aliyev’s supporters in return for the contract.

When the documents emerged in 2000, BP denied supplying arms –
although sources admitted its representatives had "discussed the
possibility".

A BP spokesman said last night of Mr Abrahams’ claims: "There are some
facts in his account that are accurate, but we don’t recognise most of
it. We regard it as fantasy."

A spokeswoman for John Reid said she had no comment and the Foreign
Office said of Mr Abrahams’ claims: "We neither confirm nor deny
anyone’s allegations in relation to intelligence matters."

© 2007 Il Legno storto
Copyright LS Edizioni s.c. a r.l.

Armenians hungry for change in parliamentary election

Agence France Presse — English
May 12, 2007 Saturday 12:34 AM GMT

Armenians hungry for change in parliamentary election

YEREVAN, May 12 2007

Armenians go to the polls Saturday hungry for change in what is being
billed as a litmus test for democracy in this impoverished ex-Soviet
country.

Surveys show an overwhelming majority of Armenians support radical
reform, but polls predict pro-government parties will come out ahead
in the parliamentary election.

The vote is seen as a key test of democracy in the small mountainous
republic wedged between Turkey and Iran, where no election has been
judged fair since independence with the collapse of the Soviet Union
in 1991.

More than 20 opposition parties are running and analysts say these
divisions have scuttled chances of defeating two pro-government
parties — the ruling Republican Party of Armenia (HKK) and the
Prosperous Armenia party headed by millionaire former World Arm
Wrestling Champion Gagik Tsarukian.

Opposition leaders claim the vote will be rigged and are already
planning street demonstrations on Sunday to pressure the government
to overturn the results.

About 2.3 million of Armenia’s three million people are registered to
vote in elections for 131 seats in the National Assembly.

Hundreds of local and international observers will monitor the vote,
including more than 300 from the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe.

The United States and European Union have repeatedly warned of
negative consequences if no improvement is seen over past elections,
including potential cuts of foreign aid and the scaling back of
relations.

Cuts in foreign assistance could be disastrous for Armenia, where
more than 30 percent of people live on less than two dollars (1.50
euros) a day.

The election is also seen as a dress rehearsal for a presidential
vote due next year after President Robert Kocharian steps down at the
end of his second term. The HKK, led by Kocharian’s chosen successor
Prime Minister Serzh Sarkisian, is widely expected to take first
place.

Kocharian has called on voters to support pro-government parties,
warning of instability if the opposition came to power.

"If the two most important governmental institutions — the president
and the parliament — start a confrontation, the people will be the
ones to suffer," he said on Armenian television.

Polls open Saturday at 0300 GMT and close at 1500 GMT, with
preliminary results expected within 24 hours.

Students Of Architectural University Of Hungary Recognized Winner At

STUDENTS OF ARCHITECTURAL UNIVERSITY OF HUNGARY RECOGNIZED WINNER AT REA-2007 COMPETITION HELD IN YEREVAN

Noyan Tapan
May 08 2007

YEREVAN, MAY 8, NOYAN TAPAN. Results of the REA-2007 (net of
higher architectural schools of France, Eestern and Central Europe)
competition were summed up at the Embassy of France to Armenia on May
7. As Serge Smesov, the Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary
of France mentioned, REA annual competitions are held in one of higher
educational architectural institutions of the countries united in
the net.

The 12th competition of the net was this year held at the Yerevan State
University of Architecture and Construction on May 4-7. Students of
14 educational institutions of France, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Hungary,
Ukraine, Russia, Iran and Armenia participated in the competition.

By the jury decision the first prize was given to Hungary, the
second to France and the third prize was given to students-architects
of Russia.

To recap, students of the Yerevan State University of Architecture
and Construction were recognized winners at the REA-2006 competition.

Aux Armeniens L’Histoire S’Articulant

AUX ARMENIENS L’HISTOIRE S’ARTICULANT
par Aude Bredy

L’Humanite, France
7 mai 2007

Theâtre (1) . Dans le cadre de l’annee de l’Armenie en France baptisee
Armenie, mon amie, Pascal Tokatlian cherche la parole des siens et
de leurs descendants.

La salle aeree du Theâtre de l’Aquarium semble vaste au recit de
Pascal Tokatlian. À la mesure de ses interrogations sur son origine
armenienne. Une appartenance qu’il sonde dès l’enfance. Issu du
Theâtre des Lucioles, ce comedien ne en France sait que le fascisme
a accule au depart la partie italienne de sa famille. Mais du côte
armenien… Adulte, il saura : " Certaines personnes de ma famille
m’ont raconte comment elles avaient ete chassees de chez elles. Ils ne
faisaient aucun doute qu’elles etaient arrivees en France a cause d’un
genocide. " Un genocide, la verite, souvent niee, aujourd’hui encore.

La verite pourtant. Des faits precis, des dates, d’affreux chiffres :
" Au total, les deux tiers des Armeniens de Turquie, soit environ 1,2
million de personnes, auront peri assassines entre 1915 et 1916… "
Dans le spectacle Ermen, L’histoire s’affirme, se rappelle a nous ;
a certains manuels scolaires sûrement : sur de hauts panneaux, elle
s’ecrit blanc sur noir, en lettres majuscules et lignes compactes.

Qui s’y efforce pourra la lire. Notamment la journee du 24 avril
1915, où a Constantinople, capitale de l’Empire ottoman, 600
notables et intellectuels d’origine armenienne sont arretes sur
ordre du gouvernement. Pascal Tokatlian veut " accorder aux morts
ce qui leur est dû (…) et rendre la parole aux vivants ". Dans
ce dessein, il songeait d’abord au seul temoignage du journaliste
armenien Aram Andonian, survivant qui ecrivait en meme temps qu’il
subissait la deportation dans les camps de concentration de Syrie
et de Mesopotamie. Un moment fort, c’est quand, la tete baignee par
la lumière d’une lampe proche, le comedien assène les epreuves, les
descriptions d’Andonian. Des mots tires de la nuit de l’evitement et
du deni.

S’y ajoutent ceux de Pascal Tokatlian. Qui decouvre la maison de son
grand-père en Turquie ; qui questionne sa famille aux personnages
attachants, aux tresors enfouis. Leurs souffrances subies suppurèrent
toujours car les bourreaux ne les reconnurent pas. Les sons de la
kamantcha de Gaguik Mouradian en egrènent les accords lancinants.

L’instrument opère de graciles fissures dans des silences dilates
a brûle-pourpoint.

La mise en scène, sous le regard de Julie Brochen, revèle une
fine intuition quant aux pas insatiables du comedien sur lequel
s’abattent des noirs eloquents. Dommage que notre attention se
relâche la où trop souvent le recit de la vie familiale en France
glisse vers l’anecdotique. Et que l’interpretation soit trop tenue,
parfois crispee sur une note monocorde bridant l’emotion ou l’humour,
comme s’il etait encore difficile a Pascal Tokatlian de se laisser
irriguer par ses mots. Mots d’importance.

Jusqu’au 23 mai au Theâtre de l’Aquarium, La Cartoucherie – route du
Champ-de-Manoeuvre, 75012 Paris. Metro Château-de-Vincennes, sortie
n° 6, bois de Vincennes, puis navette gratuite Cartoucherie.

Du mardi au samedi a 20 h 30 et dimanche a 16 heures (relâche le
dimanche 20 mai).

Reservations : 01 43 74 99 61.

–Boundary_(ID_qIlNoLWX53iOfyYXQ619gg)–

Two Armenia Opposition Leaders Suspected Of Money Laundering

TWO ARMENIA OPPOSITION LEADERS SUSPECTED OF MONEY LAUNDERING

ITAR-TASS News Agency, Russia
May 7 2007

The initiators of the opposition public movement Civil Disobedience,
ex-Vice Prime Minister of Armenia Vagan Shirkhanyan and former
Foreign Minister of the republic Alexander Arzumanyan are figuring in
a criminal case of money laundering, the press centre of the Armenian
National Security Service reported on Monday.

The Security Service officers found out in a special search operation
that the above persons when they were in Moscow on April 24-26
"criminally conspired with Russian citizen Levon Markos who is
wanted in Armenia under a two-year-old criminal case of financial
forgery." They undertook to "transport to Armenia and legalise money
sums of dubious origin," according to the press service.

According to the Armenia Security Service officials, Markos "is
pursuing certain ends in the pre-election period in Armenia and hopes
to accomplish them."

The Security Service registered, in particular, that on April 27,
the Converse Bank in Yerevan transferred by instalments to accounts
in the name of nine front men from Moscow a sum worth 180,000 US
dollars that actually was meant for Shirkhanyan and Arzumanyan.

During searches of their flats within the framework of the opened
criminal case on May 5 operatives found major sums of foreign
currency. During interrogation the former Armenian foreign minister
refused to give evidence regarding the origin and intended use of
the sum of 55,400 dollars confiscated during the search.

The Armenian parliamentary elections are scheduled for May 12.

Drama In Yerevan – Aronian Wins Rapid Match 4:2

DRAMA IN YEREVAN – ARONIAN WINS RAPID MATCH 4:2

Chessbase News, Germany
May 7 2007

07.05.2007 – World Champion Vladimir Kramnik was trailing by two
points, and on the final day he almost pulled off an historic save.

In both games he had a forced mate on the board, and in both cases,
plagued by time constraints, he went on to almost lose the game. The
two draws left Levon Aronian, Armenia’s great treasure, with a 4:2
victory. Illustrated report with analysis.

The Aronian-Kramnik Rapid Chess Match took place in Yerevan, Armenia,
from May 4th to 6th, 2007. It went over six games, played at the rate
of 25 min for the entire game with a increment of 10 seconds per move.

Day three report (final) >>From the tournament bulletin:

Levon Aronian defeated the World Champion Vladimir Kramnik 4-2 in a
fine display of active play, tactics, and execution. After losing the
first game, the young Armenian reeled off three wins in a row, and
then held a dramatic game 5 draw to win the match. Kramnik is known
to be an excellent rapid chess player, armed with fantastic opening
knowledge as well as vast match experience. However, playing on his
home soil, it was Aronian who appeared to be directing the style –
and outcome – of the match.

The fireworks lasted throughout the three-day match. Even during game
six, with the match outcome no longer in question, the packed Opera
House spectators sat on the edge of their seats (or in the aisles,
on the handrails, or on each other) fascinated by the final moves
which were blitzed out until the final draw was agreed.

Game five Aronian came out fighting. Needing only one draw in two
games to wrap up the match (leading 3-1 after the 1st 4 games),
Aronian played an unorthodox opening, emerging with a precarious
position. However, as is becoming customary with him, the Armenian
countered with several middle-game tactics and ideas, and despite being
low on his clock, entered an endgame that seemed tenable. At this
point however, it was Kramnik, perhaps drawing upon his last energy
reserves to salvage the match, went for a mating combination with
rook and knight. He had Aronian on the ropes but missed out on a final
knight maneuver which would have kept his match hopes alive. Aronian
defended well, secured the draw, and in doing so won the match.

Kramnik,V (2772) – Aronian,L (2759) [A60] Rapid Match Yerevan ARM (5),
06.05.2007 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.g3 c5 4.d5 exd5 5.cxd5 b5 6.Nd2 Nxd5
7.Bg2 Nc7 8.Bxa8 Nxa8 9.b4 c4 10.a4 Bxb4 11.Qc2 Bb7 12.Ngf3 a6 13.axb5
axb5 14.Qb2 Qf6 15.Qxb4 Qxa1 16.0-0 Qa6 17.Bb2 f6 18.Ba3 d6 19.Nd4 Nc7
20.Rb1 0-0 21.Nxc4 bxc4 22.Qxb7 Qxa3 23.Qxc7 Qc5 24.Rb7 Qxc7 25.Rxc7 d5
26.Nf5 Na6 27.Rxg7+ Kh8 28.Ra7 Nb4 29.Rc7 h5 30.Kg2 Re8 31.e3 Nd3 32.f4

Until now Aronian has been hanging on in this Modern Benoni. But
now he embarks on a devious plan: 32…Ra8? 33.Kh3 Ra5? Gives up the
h-pawn and allows Kramnik’s king to join in a mating attack. 34.Kh4
Rc5 35.Rd7 Kg8 36.Kxh5 Kf8 37.Nd6 c3?? Ignoring the treat and allowing
forced mate. 38.Kg6 Rc6

Now it is mate in seven: 39.Rf7+ Kg8 40.Re7 Nxf4+ (or 40…Ne5+ )
41.gxf4 Rc8 42.Rg7+ Kf8 43.Kh7 Rc7 44.Rxc7 c2 45.Rf7#. But in time
trouble Kramnik doesn’t see it. 39.Kxf6? Kg8 40.Kg6 Kf8 41.Kf6 Kg8.

Kramnik is struggling to find the win, and gets into deep trouble.

42.g4?? Nc5 43.Rd8+ Kh7 44.Kf7 Rc7+ (44…c2 also wins) 45.Kf6.

Now White is lost, since Black can play 45…c2 46.g5 Nd7+ and the
c-pawn queens and wins, since White has no serious mating attack. But
Aronian, also short of time, does not see this line. 45…Rc6? 46.Kf7
Rc7+? He could still win with 46…c2. 47.Kf6 Rc6 and draw agreed,
even though …c2 was still in the books. A tough struggle with
missed chances, typical for chess played under great tension and
time constraints.

Game six The sixth game began innocently enough. With the match in
hand, Aronian played the opening somewhat complacently, and Black
achieved the upper hand. Once again however, Kramnik was unable to
capitalize on a promising position, and the game spiraled into a wild
finish where no one was able to predict any moves, and any of three
results (1-0, ½-½, or 0-1) was possible.

Aronian,L (2759) – Kramnik,V (2772) [D12] Rapid Match Yerevan ARM
(6), 06.05.2007 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 Bf5 5.Nc3 e6 6.Nh4
Bg6 7.Nxg6 hxg6 8.g3 Nbd7 9.Bg2 dxc4 10.Qe2 Nb6 11.0-0 Bb4 12.Bd2 0-0
13.Ne4 Qe7 14.Bxb4 Qxb4 15.Nc5 Rab8 16.Rfc1 Rfd8 17.Qc2 Nfd7 18.Ne4
e5 19.a3 Qe7 20.Re1 Nf6 21.Ng5 exd4 22.exd4 Qd6 23.Nf3 Re8 24.Re5
Nfd7 25.Ra5 a6 26.Rd1 Rbd8 27.Bf1 Re7 28.Rg5 Qf6 29.Kg2 Rde8 30.h4
Qe6 31.a4 Qe4 32.Qc1 f6 33.Ra5 Qe6 34.Qc2 Qe4 35.Qc1 Kh8 36.Re1

36…Qg4. There was an interesting alternative: 36…Qxf3+ 37.Kxf3
Rxe1 38.Qc2 Rxf1 39.Qxg6 Re7 40.Rh5+ Kg8 41.Qh7+ Kf7 looks promising
for Black. 37.Rxe7 Rxe7 38.Bxc4 Nxc4 39.Qxc4 Qe4 40.Qb3 c5 41.dxc5
Qc6 42.Qc3

42…Re2? Once again Black misses a great opportunity: 42…Ne5! and
now for instance 43.b4 (or 43.Qe3 Rd7 threatening devastating …Rd3)
43…g5 44.hxg5 fxg5 45.b5 Qd5 and Black is winning. 43.b4? Aronian
does not see the black threats. 43…Ne5 44.b5 Qe4 45.c6

45…Nd3? Instead of forcing mate: 45…Ng4 46.cxb7 Rxf2+ 47.Kg1 Qe2
48.b8Q+ Kh7 and White will be mated, even with two queen on board.

46.Qxd3 Qxd3 47.cxb7 Re8? Allows White to turn tables. 48.bxa6 Qb3
49.Rc5 Kh7 50.Rc8 Rg8 51.Nd4 Qb6 52.Rxg8 Kxg8

53.Kg1? White could have simply played 53.a5 Qc7 54.Kh2 Kh7 55.Nc6
Qxc6 56.b8Q Qxa6 57.Qb6 (or 57.Qd8). With his king in safety he can go
for the win. After the text move the game is a draw: 53…Kh7 54.Nc6
Qb1+. Black escapes with a perpetual. 55.Kg2 Qe4+ draw.

Photos: 8

–Boundary_(ID_jiyaJfCchcclwb4EwvrtHw)–

http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=383

France’s Blow To Turkey’s Hopes

FRANCE’S BLOW TO TURKEY’S HOPES
By Patrick Seale, Special to Gulf News

Gulf News, United Arab Emirates
May 7 2007

Turkey’s hopes of admission to the European Union have been damaged
by the heated contest for the French presidency between the right-wing
Nicolas Sarkozy and his Socialist opponent, Segolene Royal.

The campaign has revealed a virulent strand of anti-Turkish feeling
in French opinion which could have serious consequences for Turkey
and for its turbulent Middle Eastern neighbours.

Throughout the campaign, Sarkozy’s opposition to Turkey’s EU membership
has been blunt, categorical and frequently repeated.

Turkey, he says, is not a European country. It lies in Asia Minor.

Its entry into the Union would reduce the EU to a mere trading bloc,
robbing it of political clout.

It would prevent the emergence of a "political Europe" – that is to
say a politically cohesive continent able to make its voice heard in
the world, on a par with the United States, China, Russia, India and
other emerging powers.

Sarkozy’s political objections to Turkey’s membership have been
reinforced by an apparent concern for France’s cultural identity.

He has made little effort to conceal his distaste at the thought of
Europe being swamped by a Muslim country of over 70 million people,
40 per cent of whom are under the age of 15.

As Minister of Interior for the past four years, Sarkozy’s restrictive
policy on immigration – essentially from North Africa and Black Africa
– strongly suggests that he believes there are already enough Muslims
in France, without an influx of Turks.

In her speeches, Royal has been less hostile to Turkey’s admission
into the EU. Her position is that a process of negotiations with
Turkey has begun and should be allowed to proceed.

Once the process is complete in 10 years or more, the French public
will have the opportunity to give its verdict by referendum. This
is the policy to which Jacques Chirac, France’s outgoing president,
has given his word. To change course now would be a betrayal.

She did hint, however, that the EU might grant Turkey something less
than full membership, on the lines of the "privileged relationship"
proposed by the German Chancellor Angela Merkel. The Turkish
government, however, has adamantly rejected the idea. It wants full
membership or nothing.

Both candidates – and especially Sarkozy – have shown a woeful
insensitivity, if not outright ignorance, of the impact of their
policies on Turkish opinion, already deeply offended by European
hesitations.

A rejection by Europe will have adverse consequences for Turkish
domestic and foreign policy; for Turkey’s neighbours – Iraq, Iran and
Syria; and for such unresolved conflicts as those between Israel and
the Palestinians and between the Greek and Turkish parts of Cyprus.

The paradox

Surprisingly, issues of foreign policy were almost totally absent from
the contest for the French presidency, with both candidates evidently
more at ease debating such questions as unemployment, health care,
pensions and law and order.

It is unfortunate that the French presidential election has
coincided with a crisis in Turkey between, on the one hand, the
secular establishment, backed by the powerful armed forces and, on
the other, the government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and
his moderately Islamic AKP (Justice and Development Party).

With the seven-year term of the arch-secularist President Ahmet Necdet
Sezer coming to an end on May 16, Erdogan proposed his close colleague
Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul for the post.

Secularists were immediately up in arms at the thought that Islamists
would then control the presidency – traditionally a secularist
stronghold – as well as the government and the parliament.

When the constitutional court, citing the lack of a parliamentary
quorum, annulled the first round of elections which would have put
Gul in the presidential palace, Erdogan called early elections for
July 22. His AK Party is likely to win an even greater majority than
at present.

The Turkish paradox – which Sarkozy clearly failed to grasp – is
that the drive for EU membership, for democracy, for free markets,
individual liberties and a vibrant civil society has come from the
AKP and not from its secular opponents. Erdogan’s government, which
came to power in 2002, has carried out a major economic and political
transformation.

His AKP government has reined in the powers of the military, promised
greater rights for the Kurdish population, improved relations with
Greece, shown flexibility over the Armenian question and over Cyprus,
proposed mediating between Israelis and Palestinians, and has consulted
with all parties in Iraq in a bid to stabilise that country and
preserve its unity. Above all, by demonstrating that democracy and
Islam can be reconciled, Turkey has provided an example to the whole
Middle East.

Slamming Europe’s door in Turkey’s face, as Sarkozy has recommended,
must inevitably set back these highly promising developments, and
reawaken in Turkish opinion a proud and prickly nationalism hostile
to the West, and inclined to settle quarrels by military force rather
than democratic dialogue.

Whatever Sarkozy may think, Turkey is a unique bridge between the
West and the world of Islam. To rebuff Turkey at this critical moment
would be a strategic error of the first importance. Turkey’s bid for
EU membership must be encouraged, not disappointed.

Patrick Seale is a commentator and author of several books on Middle
East affairs.

100 Buses And 20 Trolley-Buses Of Medium Capacity To Be Brought To Y

100 BUSES AND 20 TROLLEY-BUSES OF MEDIUM CAPACITY TO BE BROUGHT TO YEREVAN THIS YEAR

Noyan Tapan
May 03 2007

YEREVAN, MAY 3, NOYAN TAPAN. 100 buses and 20 trolley-buses of medium
capacity will be brought to Yerevan by the end of the year. As Yerevan
Mayor Yervand Zakharian reported at the May 2 press conference, after
bringing the buses the number of buses of medium capacity exploited
in Yerevan will reach 350.

The Mayor said that in the first quarter of 2007 the number of
microbuses running by Yerevan’s central part was reduced by nearly
600 and by the end of the year will be reduced by another 300. It
was mentioned that the number of nearly 3200 microbuses currently
exploited in Yerevan will be also reduced: in the coming two or three
years it will reach 1500.

In Y. Zakharian’s words, this year 300 mln drams has been allocated
for restoration of Yerevan street traffic lights. Besides, a new
automatic system of management of transport and traffic will be
introduced in Yerevan by 2008.