Opening Of Dilijan Reserve’s Historic-Cultural Part To Take Place In

OPENING OF DILIJAN RESERVE’S HISTORIC-CULTURAL PART TO TAKE PLACE IN AUGUST

Noyan Tapan
Jun 07 2007

YEREVAN, JUNE 7, NOYAN TAPAN. As a result of the investment program
aimed at restoration and preservation of Dilijan historic-cultural
reserve-museum implemented by the Tufenkian Hospitality company,
Dilijan will become the most preferrable place for local inhabitants
and tourists to have their rest there. As company Director Hakob
Hakobian reported at the June 6 press conference, restoration work
is being done in the Dilijan historic-cultural reserve in Sharambeyan
street. In his words, investments amounting to 160 mln drams (nearly
457 thousand dollars) were made for the purpose of restoring the
buildings and constructions in the reserve by the historic style. The
reserve will have a museum, which is to be a special residential
construction peculiar to the 19th century, will be furnished with
handmade furniture and will have an exhibition hall. "There will be
small shops, workshops and studios, too, where Armenian masters will
work and will sell their handworks," the company Director said. The
opening of the historic-cultural part of the reserve will take place
in two months.

Company’s Sale and Marketing Director Narine Yeghoyan said that a hotel
complex with 40 rooms and a restaurant are being built in Dilijan,
too. In her words, Avan Dilijan is the fourth hotel of Tufenkian
Traditional Hotels network. Renowned Armenian and American architects
and designers took part in its projecting. N. Yeghoyan said that the
hotel will be built by the traditional Armenian architectural style,
will be furnished with handmade furniture and Tufenkian handmade
carpets. In total, nearly 1.5 mln dollars will be spent on hotel
building. The hotel will be opened in 2009.

It was also mentioned that the Tufenkian Traditional Hotels network
will be replenished by another three hotels, which will be built in
the village of Areni, Vayots Dzor, in Yerevan and in Stepanakert. The
construction activities of the first two have already started and
the third is at the stage of projecting.

BAKU: OSCE Hopes For Settlement Of Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Soon

OSCE HOPES FOR SETTLEMENT OF NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT SOON

Trend News Agency, Azerbaijan
June 5 2007

Azerbaijan, Baku / Òrend corr E. Huseynli / The OSCE hopes for the
settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict soon. The co-chairmen of
the OSCE Minsk Group will increase their activities in this connection,
the personal representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office, Andrzej
Kasprzyk, reported on 5 June. He was commenting on the visit of the
OSCE Chairman-in-Office, Miguel Angel Moratinos, to Azerbaijan.

According to Kasprzyk, both sides have attempted to settle the
Nagorno-Karabakh problem.

Regarding arson that has been committed in the occupied Azerbaijani
territories, Kasprzyk noted that monitoring had been held in the
Gapanly village of the Azerbaijani Terter region. Further monitoring
will be held soon in the southern contact line. Kasprzyk added that
the fires in the occupied territories could have been caused naturally
or from outside interference.

–Boundary_(ID_jEvra/esamTBJSpuJChc dg)–

Intellectuals To Criminal Elements All represented in NA

ALL, FROM INTELLECTUALS TO CRIMINAL ELEMENTS, ARE PRESENTED AT CURRENT
NA, TATUL MANASERIAN CONSIDERS

YEREVAN, JUNE 4, NOYAN TAPAN. According to observation of Deputy of RA
National Assembly of third convocation Tatul Manaserian, in parliaments
of civilized countries of the world political variety is expressed by
representation of ethnic groups and in Armenia by presence of all
social strata, from intellectuals to criminal elements. As the latter
mentioned at the June 4 discussion, full formation of
parliamentarianism in Armenia will be much quicker and efficient if
"not only people creating law, but also those knowing and respecting
law" appear in the parliament. Such figures are needed who will treat
NA as a political institution and not as "asphalt construction trust."
Whereas, in the words of the former MP, today the home political field
does not have "either normal oppositionists or normal pro-governmental
forces:" very few political figures not selling themselves have
remained."

According to observation of Armen Ashotian, member of parliamentary
faction of Republican Party of Armenia, in many countries the public
makes its political choice and then expresses discontent for the choice
made by itself, and from this point of view Armenia is not an
exception, either. In his words, the newly elected NA has a historic
mission: to contribute to full formation of political culture. And for
this A. Ashotian advised each representative of political field: "Love
not yourself in the parliament, but parliamentarianism in yourself."

Armenia’s universal credit orgs contribute to poverty reduction

Arka News Agency, Armenia –
June 1 2007

ARMENIA’S UNIVERSAL CREDIT ORGANIZATIONS CONTRIBUTE TO POVERTY
REDUCTION

YEREVAN, June 1. /ARKA/. The activity of Armenia’s Universal credit
organizations (UCO) has a significant role in the aspect of poverty
reduction in the country, said Chairman of the Central Bank of
Armenia (CBA) Tigran Sargsyan during the anniversary of the FINCA
Armenia UCO.
He said that at the current stage of reforms in Armenia, the activity
of the credit organizations is rather significant.
"It is accounted for by the fact that the prior issue for Armenia in
the implementation of economic reforms is the poverty reduction," he
said.
Sargsyan pointed out that the peculiarity of the UCO, in particular,
of FINCA Armenia is that it manages to provide credits to citizens
with little incomes, which creates more favorable conditions for
poverty reduction.
"That is why we welcome the activity of FINCA Armenia and hope that
the implementation of rather ambitious programs that the company has
will contribute to significant rise of its clients," Sargsyan said.
He added that it can have a positive role in improving the
social-economic situation in Armenia.
In his turn, General Executive Director of FINCA International Inc,
shareholder of the FINCA Armenia UCO Rupert Scofield pointed out that
the organization is optimistically determined to implement the
further activity in Armenia in the sphere of microfinance due to the
favourable legal field, which is formed and is functioning in the
country.
"Today the number of our clients is over 11ths and we intend to
enlarge our client base up to 50ths people by 2008," he said.
General Director of FINCA Armenia UCO Yervand Barseghyan added that
as of end of May the organization’s total credit portfolio reached
$8.5mln.
"The Universal credit organization FINCA Armenia" was registered on
March 28, 2006. As of March 31, 2007, the assets of the FINCA Armenia
made AMD 3bln, total capital – AMD 927.8bln, profit during the first
quarter – AMD 14.4mln, and the cumulated profit on the capital
account – AMD 28.1mln. The volume of credit investments made AMD
2.4bln.
As of March 31, 2007, there are 17 credit organizations and 30
branches registered in Armenia. The total assets of Armenia’s credit
organizations make AMD 26,417.5mln as of March 31, 2007. The profit
of Armenia’s credit organizations during the first quarter made AMD
514.7mln. The total capital of credit organizations makes AMD
8,865.9mln. ($1 – AMD 347.87). L.M. -0–

Intent to Remain

Russia Profile, Russia
June 1 2007

Intent to Remain

By Daria Vaisman
Special to Russia Profile

Georgia Wants Out of the CIS, but Not Quite Yet

This February, the Georgian parliament’s ruling majority voted once
again to postpone a vote on a proposal calling for the country’s
withdrawal from the CIS, after an earlier postponement of the same
vote two months previously. Opposition members, who had initiated the
bill but softened its wording to encourage President Mikheil
Saakashvili to push it through, reacted with the usual mixture of
frustration and incredulity to what they perceived as the ruling
party’s needless intransigence on the issue of withdrawal. `I cannot
understand why we can’t cut those hidden ties that still keep us in
the CIS,’ MP Zviad Dzidziguri, speaking on behalf of the opposition
Conservative Party, told parliament. `I cannot see any reason, any
argument that can speak in favor of our CIS membership.’

Rather than disagree with this assessment, however, the ruling party
responded to the vote’s demurral by promising that CIS withdrawal was
a reality whose time would eventually come. `We will quit the CIS,’
parliamentary chairperson Nino Burjanadze said, `but will do that
only when it is most beneficial for Georgia.’

But when? For the past year, the ideal timing for Georgia’s
withdrawal from the CIS has topped the list of public debates,
further fractionalized both the opposition and the ruling party, and
galvanized the publicÑsurprising, perhaps, considering the general
perception that the CIS serves little practical purpose, nor impedes
Georgia’s westward integration in any meaningful way. Both Georgian
opposition and ruling party politicians have dismissed the CIS as a
moribund institution with few quantifiable benefits in political,
economic, or security spheres; they claim that the organization is
little more than a vehicle for CIS superstate Russia to dominate the
policies of its other members.

Moving Away From Russia

The intensity of the debates, however, lies in Georgia’s overwhelming
desire to further distance itself from Russia. CIS withdrawal is
considered to be one of the final steps in the country’s long and
laborious divorce from Russia, following the removal of two Russian
bases from Georgia’s territory last year. That move, and the promise
of CIS withdrawal, has received overwhelming support from a public
perhaps more antagonistic to Russian influence than even
Saakashvili’s pro-Western party. `It’s good for Misha that the
opposition is pushing to leave CIS sooner rather than later,’ said
Georgian analyst Ghia Nodia. `It demonstrates that while people say
he is radical, the opposition is more radical and he is more
reasonable and prudent.’

Georgia had made gestures towards leaving the CIS before – in
November 2004, when Defense Minister Giorgi Baramidze justified his
absence from a Moscow-based CIS defense ministerial meeting by
calling the organization `yesterday’s history’ – but the fiercest
debates on withdrawal only began in earnest during the first signs of
Georgia’s worsening relationship with Russia this past year.
Discussions over CIS withdrawal have since followed an arc that
parallels the country’s mercurial relationship with its northern
neighbor. Following Russia’s wine and water embargo on Georgia in May
of last year, Saakashvili set up a high-level committee to assess the
economic repercussions of leaving the CIS. Countering whispers that
withdrawal was imminent, however, Saakashvili concluded that
membership better served Georgia’s interests for the time being.

Looking Towards Nato

In part, Saakasvhili is working on the premise that while CIS
membership may serve little practical benefit, it does not pose any
major obstacles to Georgia’s future plans, at least for the time
being. In 1999, Georgia declined to renew its membership in the
CIS’s main military body, the Collective Security Treaty Organization
(CSTO), opting instead to focus more heavily on GUAM, a security
alliance made up of Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova that was
created as a counterpart to the CIS and seen as a way to counter
Russia’s influence in the region. Leaving the CSTO – which stipulates
that members are not able to join other military alliances – has
removed the greatest obstacle to Georgia’s most immediate foreign
policy objective, which is eventual integration into NATO. Last
February, Georgia withdrew from the CIS’s other military arm, the
Council of Defense Ministers, with Saakashvili pronouncing that
Georgia `has taken a course to join NATO’ and would not be part of
two military structures simultaneously.

With the defense council and CSTO out of the way, CIS membership is
no longer incompatible with NATO, which has not demanded that Georgia
withdraw from the CIS even as Georgia has entered a fast-track stage
toward NATO membership. `Whatever the history was, now that the CIS
is neither an alliance nor a collective security organization, it’s
not clear that there is any reason for it to be in opposition to
NATO, which is both an alliance and a security organization,’ said
Jonathan Kulick, director of studies at the Georgian Foundation for
Strategic and International Studies, a Tbilisi-based think tank.

Ironically, it was Georgia’s desire to reap the benefits of a CIS-led
security force that was behind the country’s original motivation for
joining the organization. Georgia was the last of the CIS members to
join the organization, signing up only in May 1993 when Eduard
Shevardnadze needed to bring in CIS peacekeepers, who could subdue
the violence that had shaken the conflict zones of South Ossetia and
Abkhazia. `They had to accept the peacekeepers,’ said Stephen Blank,
professor of national security studies at the U.S. Army War College
Strategic Studies Institute. `I don’t think they had a choice. The
country was falling apart, and it stopped the war.’

Now, it is the continued presence of these same peacekeepers in
Abkhazia and South Ossetia that has created one of the few real
drawbacks to Georgia’s CIS membership and has been a source of much
of the ongoing conflict between Georgia and Russia. Georgia has
continued to agitate for the removal of CIS peacekeepers in both
conflict zones, to be replaced by an international peacekeeping
force, yet has been unable to secure international support to call
for their removal. But while the mandate negotiated in 1993 provides
for a CIS peacekeeping force, others question its legitimacy to date.
`According to international law, there is some dispute over whether
the CIS has devolved all of their military functions,’ said Kulick.
`People argue that the CIS mandate for peacekeeping in Abkhazia is no
such mandate – not to mention that the CIS just rubberstamped what
was a Russian operation.’

Trying to Find a Reason to Stay

For Georgia, the most compelling reason to remain in the CIS has been
its desire to extend a fig leaf to Russia after the fallout from the
public expulsion of four Russians accused of spying, along with
general criticism that Georgia has been excessively provocative
towards Russia. In recent months, Georgia has tried to repair some of
the damage, refraining from making overt anti-Russian statements and
initiating several bilateral meetings where the possibility of
reopening transport links was discussed.
Georgia’s political elite worry that withdrawing from the CIS now
will be taken as another provocation against Russia, and the decision
not to antagonize Russia needlessly – at least until Georgia has an
equally strong ally in the form of NATO – is seen as the most
politically expedient choice. `Just leaving the CIS would be used
against Georgia for being provocative, which we do not want to be and
which we are not. We are only reacting in the cases when our real
national interests are at stake,’ said influential Georgian National
Party MP Giga Bokeria. Nodia agrees: `I think the thinking of this
government – and I agree with it – is that the CIS is a marginal
organization and not very important,’ he said. `On the other hand, it
doesn’t make sense to leave the CIS, because Georgia should not be
seen as too radical or doing something to spite Russia. So why not
demonstrate that we are rational?’
Speaking to politicians and analysts, an apparent paradox emerges:
Georgia’s perception of the CIS as a weak institution has been
precisely the reason it has delayed withdrawal. `They can make those
sorts of concessions precisely because it is a largely meaningless
organization that doesn’t have any practical function,’ said Kulick.
`If in fact CIS membership would actually preclude NATO membership or
put up any sort of barrier to it, I don’t think they’d spend ten
seconds deliberating whether to leave or not.’

Others, such as Blank, point out that CIS membership offers Georgia
more than mere symbolic value as a placeholder vis-a-vis Russia – CIS
membership gives Georgia a forum to negotiate on its own behalf.
According to Blank, `the benefit of being in the CIS is that it is
essentially an area where they can talk to and about Russia all at
once. The Georgians leaving the CIS deprives them of a way of talking
to and about Russia to the successor states.’ If Georgia had not been
a CIS member this past year, he suggests, the fallout from worsening
Russian-Georgian relations might have been more severe. `If Georgia
isn’t in the CIS, they have no way of influencing CIS policy against
them, and may be vulnerable to its decisions. There’s a French
proverb that says the absent ones are always wrong.’

Others disagree, pointing out that Russian policies against Georgia
were initiated regardless of the position of other CIS member states.
`This row with Russia showed that if Russia thinks differently [than
the other CIS countries], being in the CIS is useless, or of a very
limited benefit,’ said Nodia. Kulick agrees. `I don’t see how being
in the CIS makes Georgia any less obstinate from Moscow’s
perspective, or how leaving the CIS would preclude any opportunities
for reconciliation,’ he said.

While relations with Russia have worsened this past year, Georgia has
managed to strengthen its ties to several other CIS countries –
Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Azerbaijan in particular. `The [CIS]
relationship is beneficial both for Georgia and our other partners in
the CIS,’ said Bokeria. Ukraine, a fellow GUAM member, remains a
strategic partner with a long-standing friendship with Georgia,
despite recent changes in leadership. And Kazakhstan has quickly
become Georgia’s largest investor, putting up hundreds of millions of
dollars to build hotels and resorts in Tbilisi and in the Black Sea
town of Batumi. In March, Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev
announced that the country is considering buying a $1 billion oil
refinery in Batumi’s port. Most promising, perhaps, is a growing
alliance between Azerbaijan and Georgia, as the two countries build a
South Caucasus trade and energy corridor that links Azerbaijan
through Georgia to Turkey and straight to Europe. This will give many
countries an energy export route that bypasses Russia and will also
improve trade links between the countries of the South Caucasus, with
the exception of Armenia, which has been cut out of such projects due
to its conflicts with both Azerbaijan and Turkey. Azerbaijan will
fund Georgia’s $220 million share of a new Turkey-Georgia-Azerbaijan
railroad, and stepped in this winter to provide low-priced gas from
its Shah Deniz field when Gazprom promised to double Georgia’s energy
prices.

But while Georgia has benefited from bilateral relations with its
fellow CIS countries, Bokeria points out that these deals were
negotiated outside the framework of the CIS. As for the number of CIS
treaties that provide favorable customs and tax benefits to Georgia
vis-a-vis its member states, he says that these will be renegotiated
as bilateral treaties if and when Georgia decides to withdraw. `The
things which are together with the CIS can be replaced – all of them.
It will just be technical work, nothing else,’ he said. For the time
being, however, Georgia sees no point in drawing up such treaties.
`There are no immediate plans to leave the CIS right now,’ said
Bokeria, `although there is a very wide consensus that it’s not our
future. Our future is somewhere else – NATO and Europe, not within
the CIS.’

ernational&articleid=a1180619791

http://www.russiaprofile.org/page.php?pageid=Int

Social Democrats Lost 9 Seats In Dutch Parliament Because Of Armenia

SOCIAL DEMOCRATS LOST 9 SEATS IN DUTCH PARLIAMENT BECAUSE OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

PanARMENIAN.Net
31.05.2007 16:36 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Social democrat party of the Netherlands (PvdA)
is going to release an evaluation-report on June 1 by a commission
on the lost elections. In September of 2006 FAON made Dutch politics
aware about some candidates of Turkish origin, actively and openly
denying the Armenian Genocide, the Federation of Armenian Organizations
of the Netherlands (FAON) told the PanARMENIAN.Net journalist. When
the PvdA-party together with all parties had recognized the Armenian
Genocide in December 2004, sent one candidate away from the list as
he was an active internet-denier of the genocide, many Turkish voters
in the Netherlands reacted furiously saying they would not any more
vote the party.

FAON reminds about Nabahat Albayrak from Sivas, with Dutch and Turkish
nationality both, on second place on the list, then changed the view
on the genocide in some way. "As you may remember she finally said
"we call it genocide but in juridical way it is not"," FAON Press
Secretary Inge Drost said. Even more people criticized this turning
away for electoral reasons, which the party had done also on other
items. The result after this was a loss of 9 seats. Since Nabahat
Albayrak despite all this became secretary of State in the Coalition
the PvdA-party despite their loss is now a member of together with
Christian democrats and Rouvoets (genocide recognition motion) party
ChristenUnie, the PvdA – party policy will probably more than ever
be to protect her.

Search Announced To Member Of Gyumri Councillors K. Ghukasian On Cri

SEARCH ANNOUNCED TO MEMBER OF GYUMRI COUNCILLORS K. GHUKASIAN ON CRIMINAL CASE INSTITUTED ON FACT OF EXCHANGE OF FIRE IN GYUMRI

Noyan Tapan
May 30 2007

YEREVAN, MAY 30, NOYAN TAPAN. Preliminary investigation on the criminal
case instituted on the occasion of the incident of exchange of fire
on May 20, at about 19:30 on the crossroad of Terian and Ghukasian
streets of town of Gyumri continues.

According to the report placed on the website of RA Prosecutor
General’s Office, by preliminary investigation it was found out that
member of Gyumri Councillors Kolya Ghukasian who was in Hummer H-2 car
with the licence plate 44 SS 440 with Spartak Ghukasian also took part
in the exchange of fire. On the basis of the received evidence on May
29 a decision was made to involve K. Ghukasian as a defendant by the
signs of Article part 2, 1st, 6th and 7th clauses of Article 34-104,
part 1 of Article 235 and part 4 of Article 258 of RA Criminal Code
– attempted murder, illegal carrying of arms, hooliganism. The same
day arrest was chosen as a preventive punishment to him and search
was announced.

And on May 28, by the decision of the body carrying out preliminary
investigation, accusation was brought to suspect Norayr Soloyan by
part 3, Article 258, RA Criminal Code – hooliganism, arrest was chosen
as a preventive punishment to him.

Measures are being undertaken to reveal the identity of another persons
involved in the crime, to reveal searched persons and fire-arms used
during the exchange of fire. The preliminary investigation is going on.

TBILISI: Saakashvili Speaks of Unity in Independence Day Speech

Civil Georgia, Georgia
May 26 2007

Saakashvili Speaks of Unity in Independence Day Speech

/ Civil Georgia, Tbilisi / 2007-05-26 13:01:07
President Saakashvili said Georgia can overcome challenges and
fulfill its major tasks if only the country `stands united as one.’

Saakashvili was speaking to 15,000 servicemen who paraded in downtown
Tbilisi on May 26 to mark the Independence Day.

`Today is the day of our unity. Our strength is in our unity… The
only thing our enemy is dreaming of is to split us… There is nothing
capable of defeating us if we stand united as one… We maintained our
economy and become number one reformer last year – when there were
attempts to destroy our economy – because we managed to maintain
unity,’ Saakashvili said.

`Today we face huge challenges; but sometimes I have an impression
that some of our citizens do not understand these challenges and
tasks we face, although 99% of [population] understands it very well…
We will overcome every challenge if stand united as one.’

`We should know that our major strength is not only in this army and
not only in the weapons we have and not only in the economic
development… and not only in investments – we will have over USD 2
billion of direct foreign investment this year – our major strength
is in our motivation and in our unity,’ he added.

In his address Saakashvili stressed that Georgia is `a multi-ethnic
state;’ but there is only one nation – Georgia.

`And this nation consists of Georgian Azerbaijanis, Georgian
Abkhazians, Georgian Ossetians, Georgian Armenians etc,’ he said.

`It is our responsibility to maintain Georgia, which is multi-ethnic
and multi-confessional which has been left to us by our ancestors,
because multi-ethnicity is a wealth, multi-confession is a wealth,’
Saakashvili added.

He said that currently Georgia has a responsibility to maintain
Georgia in the borders `in which our ancestors left it for us’ and a
responsibility towards `our 500,000 compatriots who have been
expelled from Abkhazia.’

`Not only ethnic Georgians; these are ethnic Ukrainians, ethnic
Estonians, ethnic Jews, ethnic Armenians, ethnic Greeks and ethnic
Abkhazians. We have responsibility to return all of them back to
their homes [in Abkhazia],’ Saakashvili said,

He also addressed residents of breakaway South Ossetian and told them
in the Ossetian language: `We love you.’

`I want to salute our population in Tskhinvali, Java, Znauri,
Akhalgori, in Didi and Patara Liakhvi gorges [in South Ossetia] and I
want to tell them: Ossetians have not only been part of our history,
but they have always been a heroic and important part of our history…
They have been, they are and they will be part of our history in the
future as well,’ Saakashvili said.

He said that Georgia has many `allies and partners’ throughout the
world.

`And I want to express my special solidarity towards Ukrainian
people… And I want to express special solidarity towards Estonian
people, who were under a huge political pressure in recent weeks and
months and who have resisted this pressure,’ Saakashvili said.

BAKU: Russia Realizes Significance Of Azerbaijan, Avoids Rendering M

RUSSIA REALIZES SIGNIFICANCE OF AZERBAIJAN, AVOIDS RENDERING MILITARY ASSISTANCE TO ARMENIA: AZERI MP

Trend News Agency, Azerbaijan
May 25 2007

Azerbaijan, Baku / corr Trend S.Ilhamgizi / MP Asim Mollazade, the
chairman of the Democratic Reforms Party (DRP) of Azerbaijan stated
there is no serious rivalry between Azerbaijan and Russia in the
energy sector.

The implementation of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan export oil pipeline and
the Baku-Erzerum gas pipeline do not trouble Moscow, because Russia
can deliver to the world markets the oil produced in the north part
of the Caspian, Mollazade said. The Russian President plans to hold
talks with the leader of Kazakhstan.

After the Russian President Vladimir Putin’s coming to power Moscow’s
policy towards Azerbaijan has become balanced, while Armenia does
not receive military assistance from Russia as earlier, MP added.

" Russia realizes the significance of Azerbaijan, while the existing
potential is not used properly to upgrade the bilateral relations. We
cannot make Russian aware of the maintenance of the Russian culture
and language in the country. Our countries are interrelated with
close historic and culture relationships. At present mutual propaganda
could promote greatly contribute in the proximity of the cultures,"
MP Mollazade stressed.

We Know He Was One Of History’s Greatest Warriors, But New Research

WE KNOW HE WAS ONE OF HISTORY’S GREATEST WARRIORS, BUT NEW RESEARCH SHOWS GENGHIS KHAN COULD HAVE FATHERED THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN …
By Christopher Hudson

DAILY MAIL (London)
May 22, 2007 Tuesday

‘SEVEN hundred years ago, a man almost conquered the Earth. He made
himself master of half the known world, and inspired mankind with a
fear that lasted for generations.

‘In the course of his life he was given many names — Mighty Manslayer,
Scourge of God, Perfect Warrior. He is better known to us as Genghis
Khan.’

So begins Harold Lamb’s 1927 book Genghis Khan: Emperor Of All Men,
which — 80 years after its publication — remains the best-selling
history on the Mongolian warlord.

But what Lamb did not say — because there was no proof of it until
this day — is that Genghis Khan could also lay claim to being the
most prolific lover the world has ever seen.

After analysing tissue samples in populations bordering Mongolia,
scientists from the Russian Academy of Sciences believe the brutal
ruler has 16 million male descendants living today, meaning that he
must have fathered hundreds, if not thousands, of children.

And as the geneticists agree, it can be explained only by Genghis
Khan’s policy of seizing for himself the most beautiful women captured
in the course of his merciless conquests.

The Mongol victory feasts were notorious. Genghis Khan and his
commanders would tear at huge lumps of nearly raw horsemeat while
captive girls were paraded for their inspection.

Genghis Khan chose from women of the highest rank. He liked them with
small noses, rounded hips, long silky hair, red lips and melodious
voices.

He measured their beauty in carats: if he rated them below a certain
number they were sent to the tents of his officers.

On one occasion, his lieutenants were idly debating what was the
greatest enjoyment that life afforded. The consensus was leaning
toward the sport of falconry — Genghis owned 800 falcons — when
their leader offered his own deeply felt view.

‘The greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them
before you, to rob them of their wealth and see those dear to them
bathed in tears, to ride their horses and clasp to your bosom their
wives and daughters,’ he announced.

DESPITE his appetite for women, the findings of the geneticists sound
impossible. They suggest that Genghis fathered more offspring than
anyone in history.

How could 16 million men, living in an area stretching from China to
the Middle East, share the identical genetic footprint of one man?

Yet that vast region precisely matches the range of Genghis Khan’s
dominion, through which he led his 13th century Mongol armies on the
greatest orgy of pillage, rape and slaughter known to history.

It was a phenomenal achievement, accomplished in just 20 years. At
the time of his death in 1227, Genghis ruled an empire twice the size
of Rome’s, and it changed the world forever.

His original name was Temujin, but he took the title of Genghis Khan
or ‘Universal Ruler’ when he united the fractious Mongolian tribes
in 1206.

He and his pony-mounted archers then set out on a whirlwind of
foreign conquest and destruction. His armies ravished northern China,
Samarkand and the other fabled Central Asian cities of the Silk Road,
and much of far-off Russia.

Genghis and his hordes annihilated every community which resisted
them, killing or enslaving men, then distributing captured women
among themselves and raping them.

‘The plundering of enemy territories could begin only when Genghis
Khan or one of his generals gave permission,’ wrote Russian historian
George Vernadsky.

‘Once it had started, the commander and the common soldier had equal
rights, except that beautiful young women had to be handed over to
Genghis Khan.’

Often Khan took pleasure in sleeping with the wives and daughters
of the enemy chiefs. His army commanders believed him to have
extraordinary sexual powers, because he would sleep with many women
every night.

There was never any shortage of women, for he and his hordes used bone-
crushing violence to wipe out all the men who stood in their path.

A year after he and his hordes ransacked Beijing in 1214, an ambassador
to the city reported that the bones of the slaughtered formed
mountains, that the soil was greasy with human fat and that some of
his own entourage had died from diseases spread by the rotting bodies.

When Genghis and his armies laid siege to cities, the besieged
inhabitants were forced to resort to cannibalism.

His nomadic tribesmen travelled with battering rams, scaling ladders,
four-wheeled mobile shields and bombhurlers in a juggernaut that was
something new in history: a growing army which gathered prisoners as
it went along and used them as soldiers or in its slave-labour force.

The further it travelled, building its own roads, the stronger it
became. Prisoners were used as cannon-fodder — driven forward as
suicide troops to fill up the moats and take the full force of the
defences’ fire.

Where possible, Genghis Khan used local prisoners so that defenders
would hold back, unwilling to slaughter people they recognised.

In the Persian city of Merv, an ancient seat of learning regarded
as the pearl of Asia, Genghis Khan committed one of the greatest
unmechanised mass killings in history, second only to the massacres
of Armenians by Turks in 1915.

FOR FOUR days, the population was led out from the city walls to the
plains to be slaughtered. A group of Persians later spent 13 days
counting the people slain.

The Persian historian al-Juvayni, writing a generation after the
destruction of Merv, said: ‘The Mongols ordered that, apart from 400
artisans, the whole population, including the women and children,
should be killed, and no one, whether woman or man, be spared.

‘To each Mongol soldier was allotted the execution of 300 or 400
Persians. So many had been killed by nightfall that the mountains
became hillocks, and the plain was soaked with the blood of the
mighty.’ Historians today estimate that more than a million were
killed.

In southern Russia, Khan’s Mongol armies destroyed a combined Russian
army four times bigger. The surviving leaders, including Prince
Romanovitch of Kiev, surrendered on the understanding that no blood
would be shed. It wasn’t.

The captives were tied up and laid flat, where they became the
foundation for a heavy wooden platform on which the Mongol commanders
feasted and chose which women to bed, while the Prince and his allies
were crushed or suffocated.

Aside from these battlefield conquests, Genghis Khan had six Mongolian
wives, he established a large harem and he married many daughters of
foreign kings who prudently submitted to his rule.

It was on August 18, 1227, during a campaign against the Tangut people
of northwestern China, that Genghis Khan died. The reason for his
death is uncertain.

Many assume he fell off his horse, due to old age and physical fatigue;
others allege he was killed by the Tangut.

There are persistent folktales that a Tangut princess, to avenge her
people and prevent her rape, castrated him with a hidden knife and that
he never recovered. Whatever the cause, his legacy was astonishing.

His Mongol Empire ended up ruling, or briefly conquering, large parts
of modern day China, Mongolia, Russia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia,
Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Pakistan,
Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Moldova, South Korea, North
Korea and Kuwait.

His sons and heirs ruled over his empire, and may well have used
their position to establish their own large harems, especially if
they followed their father’s example.

David Morgan, a historian of Mongol history at the University of
Wisconsin, says Genghis’s eldest son, Tushi, had 40 sons.

Ata-Malik Juvaini, who wrote a treatise on the Mongols in 1260, said:
‘Of the issue of the race and lineage of Ghengis Khan, there are now
living in the comfort of wealth and affluence more than 20,000.

‘More than this I will not say … lest the readers of this history
should accuse the writer of exaggeration and hyperbole and ask how
from the loins of one man there could spring in so short a time so
great a progeny.’