Russian Political Analysts Says Kremlin Must Diversify Its South Cau

RUSSIAN POLITICAL ANALYSTS SAYS KREMLIN MUST DIVERSIFY ITS SOUTH CAUCASIAN POLICY

ARMENPRESS
May 25 2007

YEREVAN, MAY 25, ARMENPRESS: A Russian political analyst Sergey
Markedonov blamed today the Kremlin for failing to conduct a
diversified policy in regard to three South Caucasian nations. Speaking
to a conference in Yerevan titled ‘The Caucasus-2006" Sergey Markedonov
said Russia should display more realism in its relationships with
these nations.

To substantiate he cited the examples of Georgia and Armenia. "Russia
can not act as successfully in Georgia as it does in Armenia, but it
can not ignore its relationships with Georgia at all," he said.

According to Markedonov, the Kremlin has to give up the methods that
were used under the Soviets because ‘national elites in the South
Caucasus do not perceive these methods any longer."

In a reference to Russian-Armenian relations he said they spoiled
last year after Russia moved to raise the price of natural gas it
ships to Armenia, which prompted Armenian media to go as far as to
dub Russia as ‘a traitor."

According to Markedonov, another reason that accounts for cooled
Russian-Armenian relations are manifestations of xenophobia in Russia
that hit also Armenians living there.

"Unlike in Armenia where a murder of an ethnic Armenian in Russia
becomes an issue of a national scale, in Russia it goes actually
unnoticed,’ he said.

Karabakh: Louder Baku Speaks About War, More Confident Armenia Has T

KARABAKH: LOUDER BAKU SPEAKS ABOUT WAR, MORE CONFIDENT ARMENIA HAS THE RIGHT TO SPEAK ABOUT IMPOSSIBILITY OF CONCESSIONS

PanARMENIAN.Net
25.05.2007 14:57 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ "All militant calls from Azerbaijan on arms race and
possibility of launching military actions in near future give Yerevan
a quite successful reason for additional argumentation in the dialog
with western superpowers and European structures for grounding its
rights on the territories of Lower Karabakh," head of Caucasian Studies
at the Caucasian Media Institute Sergey Minasyan stated during an
international conference entitled "Caucasus-2006" in Yerevan. He said,
Azerbaijan’s militarization may give certain political preferences
to Armenia. "Azerbaijan considers militarization and calls for war
efficient tools for exerting pressure on Armenia making him be more
compliant in the Karabakh issue. Armenia can assure that in conditions
of such intensive militarization of Azerbaijan keeping that territories
under the control of Nagorno Karabakh is one of the important elements
for ensuring military balance," Minasyan underlined.

"Louder Baku speaks about war for liberating Karabakh, more confident
Armenia has the right to speak about impossibility of making
territorial concessions from Lower Karabakh. Argumentation becomes
more convincing in the eyes of the world community, since concession
of territories will disturb military balance and create in Azerbaijan
temptation to really launch military actions. Taking into account this
circumstance, it is in the interests of the world community to keep
the security zone territories around Nagorno Karabakh under Armenian
control," he said.

At the same time Minasyan underlined mass purchases of
Ukrainian armament by Azerbaijan had destabilizing effect in the
region. "Azerbaijan bought from Ukraine "Smerch" type 12 missile
systems, which approach weapons of mass destruction with their
characteristic features," he thinks.

"However, arms race is a double-edged thing, and actually it is
difficult to say how arms increase in Azerbaijan will have impact
on his offensive abilities in case if a war breaks out in Karabakh,"
Minasyan underlined.

Dashnaks Offered To Stay In Government

DASHNAKS OFFERED TO STAY IN GOVERNMENT
By Irina Hovannisian

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
May 23 2007

The Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun) said
on Wednesday that it has been offered senior positions in a new
government to be formed by Prime Minister Serzh Sarkisian and is
currently weighing up its options.

Sarkisian appears willing to share power with Dashnaktsutyun and other
parties loyal to President Robert Kocharian, even though his Republican
Party of Armenia (HHK) won an outright majority in parliament in this
month’s general elections. Observers believe he is thereby trying
to broaden political support for his bid to succeed Kocharian early
next year.

Meeting with Western election observers on Tuesday, Sarkisian said the
HHK is ready to "engage able parliamentary and extra-parliamentary
forces into both the government and the National Assembly" in order
to maximize popular trust in his new cabinet. A government statement
cited him as saying that "negotiations are already being conducted
in that direction."

Armen Rustamian, a top Dashnaktsutyun leader, confirmed that the
nationalist party, which is represented in Sarkisian’s outgoing
cabinet, is involved in those talks but refused to give details. "We
are holding discussions right now and I wouldn’t like to make any
comments now," he told RFE/RL.

"There have been various kinds of offers, but we can not say anything
concrete at the moment," Rustamian said, adding that a decision will
be made "very soon."

Another Dashnaktsutyun leader, Education Minister Levon Mkrtchian,
said he hopes his party will choose to stay in government and allow
him to retain his job. "I have a desire to work because we have
just launched a program [of education reforms] and can see its first
results," he told RFE/RL.

"It all depends on the party’s decision," added Mkrtchian. "That is, if
Dashnaktsutyun decides to be part [of the new government] I will keep
working. If it decides otherwise, I will comply with that decision."

Rustamian has repeatedly stated before that Dashnaktsutyun will not
serve as a "fifth wheel" in a coalition government not dependent on
its parliamentary backing. Nonetheless, the influential party seems
ready, in principle, to remain in government, despite the fact that
the HHK will be able to single-handedly control the parliament.

During the election campaign Dashnaktsutyun leaders implicitly laid
claim to the posts of defense and education ministers. Newspaper
reports have said that they are also demanding the post of parliament
speaker. It is not clear if they are ready to endorse Sarkisian’s
presidential bid in return.

The Prosperous Armenia Party (BHK) of businessman Gagik Tsarukian,
which came in a distant second in the elections, is also presumably
involved in the ongoing talks. Despite winning 25 parliament seats,
the pro-Kocharian party is hardly in a position to dictate to the
HHK, though.

Neither Tsarukian, nor other BHK leaders have commented on their
party’s performance in the polls so far. This is construed by
commentators as a sign that the election outcome did not live up to
their expectations.

Under the Armenian constitution, Kocharian has to appoint a prime
minister nominated by the parliament majority within ten days from
the first session of the newly elected National Assembly expected on
June 7. The new premier will have 20 days to form his cabinet.

Delegation Of Yerevan Mayor’s Office Leaves For Saint Petersburg

DELEGATION OF YEREVAN MAYOR’S OFFICE LEAVES FOR SAINT PETERSBURG

Noyan Tapan
May 23 2007

YEREVAN, MAY 23, NOYAN TAPAN. At the invitation of Saint Petersburg
Governor Valentina Matvienko, the delegation headed by Yerevan Mayor
Yervand Zakharian will pay an official visit to Saint Petersburg on
May 23-25. It is envisaged to sign within the framework of the visit
the 2007-2009 cooperation program of the two cities, the agreement
concerning preparation of which was reached in 2005 during the meeting
taken place in Yerevan between Y. Zakharian and V. Matvienko.

As Noyan Tapan was informed by the Information and Public Relations
Department of the Yerevan Mayor’s Office, other issues of cooperation
between Yerevan and Saint Petersburg will also be discussed during
the bilateral meeting.

Zaven Andriasian And Avetik Grigorian Occupy With 4 Points Each 3rd

ZAVEN ANDRIASIAN AND AVETIK GRIGORIAN OCCUPY WITH 4 POINTS EACH 3rd AND 4th HORIZONTALS OF TOURNAMENT TABLE AT INTERNATIONAL YOUTH CHAMPIONSHIP OF CHESS

Noyan Tapan
May 22 2007

KIRISHI, MAY 22, NOYAN TAPAN. The 6th stage meetings took place on
May 21 at the international youth tournament of chess being held in
the city of Kirishi, the marz of Leningrad. Avetik Grigorian won over
Sergey Zhigulko (Belarus) and Zaven Andriasian was defeated by Yan
Nepomnjashchy (Russia).

Yan Nepomnjashchy and Negi Parimarjan (India) are the leaders with
4.5 points each. Z. Andriasian and A. Grigorian occupy the 3rd and
4th horizontals with 4 points each.

Measures Taken To Invite Foreign Experts In Connection With Fact Of

MEASURES TAKEN TO INVITE FOREIGN EXPERTS IN CONNECTION WITH FACT OF LEVON GULIAN’S DEATH

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
May 18 2007

YEREVAN, MAY 18, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. During the
investigation of the case of Levon Gulian, who died under unrevealed
circumstances in the RA Police Criminal Investigation Department, two
new lawyers – Hrayr Ghukasian and Aram Karakhanian will be introduced
to L.Gulian’s legal successor. During a talk with NT correspondent,
H. Ghukasian said that measures are being taken to invite independent
foreign experts on the initiative of the OSCE. The experts will make
an alternative forensic examination.

To recap, Yerevan prosecutor’s office, which conducts an investigation
into the criminal case opened in connection with the death of
L. Gulian, has already assigned a complex examination, including a
forensic examination.

Armenian Defence Minister, British Envoy Discuss Military Cooperatio

ARMENIAN DEFENCE MINISTER, BRITISH ENVOY DISCUSS MILITARY COOPERATION

Public Television of Armenia, Yerevan
17 May 07

Armenian-British military cooperation has strengthened and improved
in the past years. This point of view was expressed during a meeting
between Armenian Defence Minister Mikayel Harutyunyan and British
ambassador to Armenia Anthony John James Cantor.

Talking about cooperation between the [two countries’] armed forces
in peacekeeping missions, the minister stressed the importance of
[English] language training for officers. He also stressed the
importance of personnel training.

An English learning class will open in a mine clearance centre on
20 May.

[Video shows the meeting]

BAKU: Azeri embassy in Russia protests at NK-related conference

Azeri embassy in Russia protests at Karabakh-related conference

Lider TV, Baku
19 May 07

The Azerbaijani embassy [in Moscow] has send a note of protest to the
Russian Foreign Ministry in connection with the Call of Mrav [Murov
mountain] conference on the history and fate of Azerbaijan’s Goranboy
District planned for 27 May.

The embassy said in the note that if conducted, the conference would
have a negative impact on bilateral ties [between Russia and
Azerbaijan], as the main aim of the conference was to give a distorted
view of the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan
to Russian society. It is also aimed at damaging Azerbaijani-Russian
relations, the embassy said.

It was stressed that such provocative acts, which had been taken many
times before, had a negative impact on public opinion in Azerbaijan
and on the Azerbaijani diaspora in Russia. In addition, the embassy
voiced serious concern about the dangerous tendencies of
anti-Azerbaijani propaganda that have been seen in the Russian media
lately.

The embassy asked the Russian Foreign Ministry to take comprehensive
measures to stop such tendencies and maintain the current level of
relations between Azerbaijan and Russia.

NICOSIA: DISY calls on EU to recognise Pontian genocide

Cyprus Mail, Cyprus
May 19 2007

DISY calls on EU to recognise Pontian genocide

DISY yesterday called on the European Union and the international
community to recognise the Pontian Greek Genocide of 1916-1923.
`Historic events such as these must always remain in our memory,’
read a statement released by the party.

Today, May 19, is Pontic Greek Genocide Day. Pontic Greek Genocide is
a controversial term used to refer to the fate of Pontic Greeks
during and in the aftermath of World War I. Whether the events were a
genocide or not is hotly debated between Turkey and Greece.

The term is used to refer to the persecutions, massacres, expulsions
and death marches of Pontian Greek populations in the southeastern
Black Sea provinces of the Ottoman Enpire, during the early 20th
century by the Young Turk administration. It has been argued that
killings continued during the Turkish national movement led by
Mustafa Kemal Atat?rk which was organised to fight against the Greek
invasion of western Anatolia.

Greece and the Republic of Cyprus officially recognise it as a
genocide. The US states of South Carolina, New Jersey, Florida,
Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Illinois also passed resolutions
recognising the events, although since states within the United
States do not have foreign-policy authority those statements are not
legally binding on a federal US level.

The Turkish government, on the other hand, rejects the term genocide,
and the selection of the date of May 19, which is a national holiday
in Turkey, is considered by some Turkish politicians to be a
provocation of Turkish national feelings.
Ankara also denies the Armenian genocide of 1915-1917, or the lesser
known massacre of hundreds of thousands of Assyrians (Syriac
Christians).

The United Nations, the European Parliament, the Council of Europe
and the International Association of Genocide Scholars have not made
any relative reference.
According to the International League for the Rights and Liberation
of Peoples, between 1916 and 1923 up to 350,000 Greek Pontians were
killed in massacres, persecution and death marches. The events were
attested to by eyewitness accounts reported in contemporary
newspapers.

At the time The New York Times and its correspondents made extensive
references to the events, recording massacres, deportations,
individual killings, rapes, burning of entire Greek villages,
destruction of Greek Orthodox churches and monasteries, drafts for
"Labour Brigades", looting, terrorism and other "atrocities" for
Greek, Armenian and also for British and American citizens and
government officials.

The paper subsequently won a Pulitzer Prize for its coverage of the
war.
According to a German military attach?, Ismail Enver, the Ottoman
Turkish minister of War, had declared in October 1915 that he wanted
to `solve the Greek problem during the war…in the same way he
believe[d] he solved the Armenian problem.’
And British historian Arnold J. Toynbee noted that it was the Greek
landings that created the Turkish Nationalist Movemet led by Mustafa
Kemal and it is almost certain that if the Greeks had never landed at
Smyrna, the consequent atrocities on the Turkish side would not have
occurred.

Toynbee added: `…The Greeks of `Pontus’ and the Turks of the Greek
occupied territories, were in some degree victims of Mr Venizelos’
and Mr Lloyd George’s original miscalculation at Paris.’

In 1923, those Greek Pontians remaining were expelled from Turkey to
Greece as part of the population exchange between the two countries
defined by the Treaty of Lausanne. In his book Black Sea, author Neal
Acheson writes:
`The Turkish guide-books on sale in Turkey today offer this account
of the 1923 catastrophe: `After the proclamation of the [Turkish]
Republic, the Greeks who lived in the region returned to their own
country.’ Their own country? Returned? Pontians had lived in that
area for over 3,000 years. The Pontian dialect was not understandable
to 20th century Athenians.’

BAKU: Gideon Sa’ar: Azerbaijan Is Strategically Important Country Fo

GIDEON SA’AR: AZERBAIJAN IS STRATEGICALLY IMPORTANT COUNTRY FOR ISRAEL

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
May 17 2007

Likud Knesset faction chairman Gideon Sa’ar’s exclusive interview to
APA’s Israel bureau

– What was the aim of your visit to Azerbaijan?

– This was my first visit to Azerbaijan. I and my colleagues Amnon
Koen, Robert Ilatov and Ran Koen were invited to Azerbaijan by
Sokhnut World Jewish Agency. There were two goals of the visit-
strengthening of bilateral interparliamentrary relations and ties
with the community of mountain Jews of Azerbaijan. We met several
Azerbaijani officials- Nazim Ibrahimov, minister in charge of Diaspora
affairs, Social Protection Minister Fuzuli Alakabarov, Foreign Minister
Elmar Mammadyarov and deputy parliament chairman Ziyafat Asgarov. I
myself was very pleased to see that Muslim country Azerbaijan is
liberal European country and keeps friendship relations with Israel
and Jewish nation. We have common interests with Azerbaijan. Today
Azerbaijan is the leader in Caucasus and initiator of all big
geopolitical projects. I think Azerbaijan is a true friendship bridge
between Europe and Asia. Most Israelis have no idea about Azerbaijan ,
but I want to tell them that prosperous Azerbaijan is a country where
Jewish people are loved.

– Within your visit to Guba you also visited the mass graves which
are the result of Armenians’ genocide committed against Azerbaijanis
and against Jewish people of Guba. What are your impressions?

– We got thorough information about this tragedy and were given a
lot of materials concerning this issue. But it is difficult for me to
express an objective position on the issue. I think that historians
should clarify it. I want to mention that Knesset has recently rejected
the proposal of Merets Party member Khaim Oron on debating the problem
of ‘Armenian genocide’. This fact demonstrates the official position
of the Israeli government on the problem called Armenian genocide. I
consider Knesset’s decision right. It could ruin strategic relations
between Turkey and Israel.

– What is Israel’s position on the conflict between Armenia and
Azerbaijan and occupation of Azerbaijani lands?

– I want to say that Israel does not ignore interests of friendly
Azerbaijan and hopes that official Baku will also take into account
Israel’s interests. Azerbaijan is a strategically important country
for Israel. We understand the country’s problems and interests.

– What is Israel’s position on the nuclear program of Iran which is
neighboring with Azerbaijan?

– We understand that Azerbaijan is situated in a very complicated
geopolitical area. And we also know that Baku is anxious about the
life of Azerbaijanis who comprise 40 percent of Iranian population.

Israel considers that Iran’s nuclear program poses a threat to
not only to Israel but also to the entire world. Iranian atom will
influence not only the Middle East but also the whole region and Asia
as well. Iranian mullahs can sell the nuclear weapons to a number
of terrorist organizations and they can use these weapons against
different countries. Israel and Azerbaijan have to do their best to
prevent this.

– Israel-Azerbaijan International Association has recently been founded
and this organization united the people moved from Azerbaijan. How
do appreciate this fact?

– I welcome this organization. This is a great event for 100,000
people of Azerbaijani origin. This great force will contribute to
the strengthening and development of the relations between Israel
and Azerbaijan. I am ready to support this organization as a member
of Azerbaijan-Israel Interparliamentary Friendship Group.