President Of The United Armenian Fund, Vice-Chairman Of The Lincy Fo

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED ARMENIAN FUND, VICE-CHAIRMAN OF THE LINCY FOUNDATION HARUT SASSOUNIAN AWARDED "GRATITUDE" MEDAL

Noyan Tapan
March 31, 2010

STEPANAKERT, MARCH 31, NOYAN TAPAN-ARMENIANS TODAY. On 30 March
President of the Artsakh Republic Bako Sahakyan met president of the
United Armenian Fund, vice-chairman of the Lincy Foundation Harut
Sassounian. Issues related to developing socio-economic spheres of
Artsakh as well as widening and deepening ties between the Motherland
and the Diaspora were discussed during the meeting.

The Head of the State rated high the role of the United Armenian
Fund in realizing different programs, building social objects and
educational hearths, as well as making Artsakh recognizable to the
outer world.

According to the report of central information department of the
office of the NKR President, Bako Sahakyan signed on 30 March decree
awarding Harut Sassounian the "Gratitude" medal for considerable
philanthropic activity.

MARAGHA: Ethnic Cleansing In Progress

ETHNIC CLEANSING IN PROGRESS
By Kim Gabrielian in Stepanakert

4.html

War in Nagorno Karabakh

By Caroline Cox and John Aijbner

with a preface by Elena Bonner Sakharov

Institute for Religious Minorities in the Islamic World

Zurich. London, Washington 1993

APPENDIX

MARAGHA: The name of this village is associated with a massacre which
never reached the world’s headlines, although at least 45 Armenians
died cruel deaths. During the CSI mission to Nagomo Karabakh in April,
news came through that a village in the north, in Mardakert region,
had been overrun by Azeri-Turks on April 10 and there had been a
number of civilians killed. A group went to obtain evidcn ce and found
a village with survivors in a state of shock, their bum-out homes
still smouldering, charred remains of corpses and vertebrae still on
the ground, where people had their heads sawn off, and their bodies
burnt in front of their families. 45 people had been massacred and 100
were missing, possibly suffering a fate worse than death. In order to
verify the stories, the delegation asked the villagers if they would
exhume the bodies’which they had already buried. In great anguish,
they did so, allowing photographs to be taken of the the decapitated,
charred bodies. Later, when asked about publicising about this tragedy,
theyreplied they were reluctant to do so as "we Armenians are not
very good at showing our grief to the world".

We believe it is important to put on record these events and the way
in which they have, or have not, been interpreted and port rayed by
the people themselves, and by the international media. International
public opinion is inevitably shaped by media coverage and lost a great
deal of political support as a result of their alleged behavior at
Khodjaly. The international media did not cover the massacre of the
Armenians at Maragha at all. Consequently, in the eyes of the world,
the armed forces of the Armenians of Nagomo Karabakh have been made
to appear more brutal then those of the Az eri-Turks; in reality,
evidence suggests that the opposite is more likely to be true.

Source: Ethnic Cleansing in Progress, War in Nagomo Karabakh, by
Caroline Cox and John Eibner, Institute for Religious Minorities in
the Islamic World, Zurich, London, Washington , 1993.

Maragha: The name of this village is associated with a massacre which
never reached the world’s headlines, although at least 45 Armenians
died cruel deaths. During the CS1 mission to Nagorno Karabakh in April,
news came through that a village in the north, in Mardskert region,
had been overrun by Azeri-Turks on April 10 and there had been a
number of civilians killed. A group went to obtain evidence and found
a village with sur­vivors in a state of shock, their burnt-out homes
still smouldering, charred remains of corpses and vertebrae still on
the ground, where people had their heads sawn off, and their bodies
burnt in front of their families. 45 people had been massacred and 100
were miss­ing, possibly suffering a fate worse than death In order to
verify the stories, the delega­tion asked the villagers if they would
exhume the bodies which they had already buried. In great anguish,
they did so, allowing photographs to be taken of the decapitated,
charred bodies. Later, when asked about publicising about this tragedy,
they replied they were reluctant to do so as "we Armenians are not very
good at showing our grief to the world". We believe ii is important
to put on record these events and the way in which they have, or
have not, been interpreted and portrayed by the people themselves,
and by the interna­tional media. International public opinion is
inevitably shaped by media coverage and the Azeri-Turks certainly
won great sympathy through their presentation of the ‘Khodjaly
massacre’. Conversely, the Armenians received much criticism and lost a
great deal of political support as a result of their alleged behaviour
at Khodjaly. The international media did not cover the massacre of the
Armenians at Maragha at all. Consequently, in the eyes of the world,
the armed forces of the Armenians of Nagorno Karabakh have been made
to appear more brutal than those of the Azeri-Turks; in reality,
evidence suggests that the opposite is more likely to be true.

"Our fight will not just end in itself"-says president of the Karabagh
National Assembly foreign relations committee Vahram Atanesyan Anahit
DANIELYAN | April 14, 2006

We can’t consider the tragedy in Maragha as a war because Maragha
was not a military post, but rather a peaceful settlement. It should
be considered as a crime against humanity for which there is no
expiration date for punishment and the perpetrators must be brought
to justice sooner or later by Karabagh, as well as the international
community. This was what president of the Karabagh National Assembly
foreign relations committee Vahran Atanesyan said on April 10 during
a press conference dedicated to the "Tragic events in Maragh on
April 10, 1992". In his speech, V. Atanesyan said that in 1992,
in the early hours of the morning at 5 a.m., the Maragha village
located in the Martakert region of Karabagh was attacked by missiles
sent from Azerbaijan’s Mirbashir region (present day Tartar region)
for three hours. Afterwards, Azerbaijani armed forces, which were
supported by the subdivision of the 4th army of Gyanja allocated in
Azerbaijan by the former Soviet Union, invaded the Maragha village
and massacred the people living there. Nearly 100 people died, mainly
women, children and elderly. The Azerbaijani armed forces took tens
of hundreds of hostages with them as they left the village, some of
which managed to escape while the rest remain missing (According to
V. Atanesyan, there are about 30 missing hostages). "As of April 10,
1992, there were more than 3,000 people living in Maragha. Currently,
only 300 people who have survived the massacres live in the Nor
Maragha village. In other words, more than 2 and a half thousand
people are living abroad and don’t have the opportunity to come back
to their homeland. The Maragha village is currently under the control
of Azerbaijani armed forces, as well as the villages of Margushavan,
Karmiravan, Seysula, etc. The Karabagh authorities have stated that
the Karabagh conflict resolution must include Karabagh’s territorial
integrity, especially the northern section of the Martakert region,
which has been the region with the most agriculture and one of the
most developed substructures of the republic. As a result of the tragic
events in Maragha and the war in progress, five wine factories, nearly
30,000 vineyards have been destroyed, and the mother water route of
Karabagh has also been ruined," says Vahram. V. Atanesyan also said
with a feeling of pity that Armenia hadn’t done anything about the
economic losses caused by Azerbaijan, as well as the evidence of the
tragic crime committed by the Azerbaijani authorities and the armed
forces. Recently, Karabagh’s National Assembly has formed a temporary
committee on reviewing the facts of the actual crime. V. Atanesyan
hopes that the committee will be able to summarize the tragic events
in Maragha before the end of the year, as well as present the facts
of the atrocities committed in the territory of Karabagh to Armenian
society, the international community, as well as the parliaments of
the member countries of the OSCE Minsk Group. Atanesyan says that
this must be done within the framework of Azerbaijan’s efforts to
bring cases against spies of the Karabagh Defense Army and several
significant individuals who fought in the Karabagh liberation war. "We
must be ready to present the facts to the international community not
as a counterattack to Azerbaijan’s anti-propaganda, but so that the
international community will know who, when and how were the people
massacred and who was it that decided to took advantage of the war
in order to organize ethnic-cleansing. Azerbaijan has led this kind
of politics for years through peace when Karabagh was still located
in Azerbaijan as an autonomous region. This politics reached the
climax in 1991, when Azerbaijan let go of the opportunity to solve
matters peacefully with the people of Karabagh and declared a war
on Karabagh. So, the attacks on the border shouldn’t be looked
at as the result of the politics led by the Karabagh authorities,
but rather as the result of Azerbaijan’s aggression and keeping the
people of Karabagh under foreign control as a means of defending the
country. If we have the studies conducted by the National Assembly
temporary committee, we can then present them to the international
community and start the propaganda so that the international community
also knows about Karabagh’s national-liberation struggle. Basically,
the fact that the Karabagh conflict may be an honor for Azerbaijan,
while it is a question of survival on the homeland for the people of
Karabagh," said the president of the Karabagh National Assembly foreign
relations committee. During the conference, the "Koltso" war was also
touched upon and according to V. Atanesyan, both the National Assembly
and the political parties must organize events to the 15th anniversary
of the war. "I don’t think that we have the chance today to bring the
perpetrators to justice, but if we are going towards international
recognition of Karabagh’s independence, then we must start raising
the issue by announcing the names of the perpetrators one by one,
especially since it’s no secret to anyone. These issues must not
only be raised by announcements, but also by an official document,
especially since today there are people living in Karabagh who have
experienced living in those concentration camps, have been arrested
as a result of the "Koltso" war and have been kept as prisoners in
different prisons around Azerbaijan. There are even people who have
been sentenced by Azerbaijani courts, but have later been released and
turned into military hostages. We must also collect evidence regarding
those people, analyze it and have an official document, which will
help us prove that this struggle does not end in itself, that it
started in our homeland in order to defend our right to live. We have
not and aren’t digging a hole for ourselves. The only guarantee that
we have to live here peacefully is the self-defense of our country
with its security and national attributes," said the president of
the committee in closing.

13 YEARS HAVE PASSED SINCE THE MARAGHA TRAGEDY

[07:36 pm] 11 April, 2005

The events of thirteen years’ prescription in the village of Maragha
of the NKR Martakert region occupy a special place by the depth of
human tragedy, the level of cruelty, the number of people exposed
to violence and captured. On April 10, 1992, as a result of the
Azerbaijani regular army units’ attack the village was basically
destroyed. According to various data, from 53 to 100 peaceful
inhabitants were brutally killed, including 30 women, 20 of them of
declining years. Their bodies were mutilated, beheaded, divided and
burnt. 53 peaceful people were captured, including 9 children, 29
women (about 3 tens of hostages were then killed in the Azerbaijani
captivity). After 2 weeks Maragha was again attacked, the population
deported, the houses robbed, many of them burnt. The deportation
of the population was accompanied with the acts of violence and
humiliation. The observers note the events in Maragha also in the
context that the violence on the peaceful population was made in the
frames of military operation by a concrete military unit. It was not
accidentally that the majority of the hostages appeared in private
houses of the servicemen of the Interior Ministry, Defense Ministry,
Detachments of Militia of Special Assignment, etc. The destiny of many
hostages is not known yet. Baroness Karoline Cox, who had visited
the place of the tragedy, was shocked to the innermost of her heart
by what she had seen. "They are not of human race" – the Baroness so
spoke of the DMSA servicemen who had carried out the slaughter.

p;id=26975

AZG Armenian Daily #037, 01/03/2006 Karabakh diary

PROVISIONAL COMMISSION IS NOT THERE TO DEMAND WAR INDEMNITY

At the last session of the NKR parliament the lawmakers passed a
law on setting up a provisional commission to study the Azerbaijani
violence against the Armenians of Nagorno Karabakh in the period
of 1988-1992. This decision is dictated by the need to present
Azerbaijan’s illegal acts before the world community, particularly
the OSCE Minsk Group and the PACE. The author of this initiative
was Vahram Atanesian, head of the Foreign Relations Committee of
the parliament. Mr. Atanesian told daily Azg that the commission
will work till the end of the year and the materials it will gather
during this period will be sent to international structures as well
as will be posted on the Internet. Suchlike commission was set up in
June 12 1992 too but it did not function because of the war and later
because of the sensitiveness of the peace talks. As today the sides
discuss humanitarian aspects of the conflict, the parliament sees it
rightful to present to the world community the massacre of Maragha
in 1992, the take-over of part of Shahumian and Martaker regions and
the humanitarian crisis that it incited. The most essential though
will be the study of notorious "Koltso" operation on May 15 1991
organized by the State Emergency Committee. Mr. Atanesian reminded
that at one point in time Russia’s Supreme Council also organized
hearings on "Koltso" operation. The researches of the provisional
commission by no means aim at demanding war indemnity from Azerbaijan,
as it is not within the parliament’s power. Vahram Atanesian thinks
that the government of Nagorno Karabakh has also to put before the
world community all facts of violence against the Azeri inhabitants
of Karabakh and the fact of considering them "second-rate citizens"
of the country. The parliamentarian explained that in exchange for
the evacuated Azeri population from Karabakh’s Azeri villages, Baku
authorities sent special militia units, terrorists and outlaws. He
assured that there are materials and videotapes to prove this.

By Kim Gabrielian in Stepanakert

Magazine: Christianity Today, April 1998 Vol. 42, No. 5

SURVIVORS OF THE MARAGHAR MASSACRE:IT WAS TRULY LIKE A CONTEMPORARY
GOLGOTHA MANY TIMES OVER By Baroness Caroline Cox of Queensbury

The ancient kingdom of Armenia was the first nation to embrace
Christianity – in AD 301. Modern Armenia, formerly a Soviet republic,
declared autonomy in September 1991 and today exists as a member
of the Commonwealth of Independent States. There you find many of
the oldest churches in the world, and a people who have upheld the
faith for nearly 1,700 years, often at great cost. Nowhere has the
cost been greater than in the little piece of ancient Armenia called
Nagorno-Karabakh, cruelly cut off from the rest of Armenia by Stalin
in 1921, and isolated today as a Christian enclave within Islamic
Azerbaijan. Only 100 miles north to south, 50 miles east to west,
there are mountains, forests, fertile valleys, and an abundance of
ancient churches, monasteries, and beautifully carved stone crosses
dating from the fourth century. This paradise became hell in 1991.

Vying with Armenia for control of this enclave, Azerbaijan began a
policy of ethnic cleansing of the Armenians of Karabakh, and 150,000
Armenians were forced to fight for the right to live in their historic
homeland. It was a war against impossible odds: 7 million-strong
Azerbaijan, helped by Turkey and, at one stage, several thousand
mujahideen mercenaries. On April 10, 1992, forces from Azerbaijan
attacked the Armenian village of Maraghar in northeastern Karabakh.

The villagers awoke at 7 a.m. to the sound of heavy shelling; then
tanks rolled in, followed by infantry, followed by civilians with
pick-up trucks to take home the pickings of the looting they knew
would follow the eviction of the villagers. Azeri soldiers sawed
off the heads of 45 villagers, burnt others, took 100 women and
children away as hostages, looted and set fire to all the homes, and
left with all the pickings from the looting. I, along with my team
from Christian Solidarity Worldwide, arrived within hours to find
homes still smoldering, decapitated corpses, charred human remains,
and survivors in shock. This was truly like a contemporary Golgotha
many times over. I visited the nearby hospital and met the chief nurse.

Hours before, she had seen her son’s head sawn off, and she had lost
14 members of her extended family. I wept with her: there could be no
words. With the fragile cease-fire that began in May 1994, we have been
able to visit survivors of the massacre at Maraghar. Unable to return
to their village, which is still in Azeri hands, they are building
"New Maraghar" in the devastated ruins of another village.

Their "homes" are empty shells with no roofs, doors, or windows, but
their priority was the building of a memorial to those who died in the
massacre. We were greeted with the traditional Armenian ceremony of
gifts of bread and salt. Then a dignified elderly lady made a speech
of gracious welcome, with no hint of reference to personal suffering.

She seemed so serene that I thought she had been away on that terrible
day of the massacre. She replied: "As you have asked, I will tell you
that my four sons were killed that morning, trying to defend us – but
what could they do with hunting rifles against tanks? And then we saw
things no human should ever have to see: heads that were too far from
their bodies; people hacked into quarters like pigs. I also lost my
daughter and her husband-we only found his bloodstained cap. We still
don’t know what happened to them. I now bring up their children. But
they have forgotten the taste of milk, as the Azeris took all our
cows." How can one respond to such suffering and such dignity? Since
the cease-fire, we have undertaken a program to supply cows. On our
last visit, we met this grandmother, and, smiling, she said: "Thank
you. Our children now know the taste of milk." Nagorno-Karabakh is a
place where we have found miracles of grace. The day of the massacre
I asked the chief nurse, whose son had been beheaded, if she would
like me to take a message to the rest of the world. She nodded, and I
took out my notebook. With great dignity, she said: "I want to say,
‘Thank you.’ I am a nurse. I have seen how the medicines you have
brought have saved many lives and eased much suffering. I just want
to say, ‘Thank you,’ to all those who have not forgotten us in these
dark days."

Baroness Cox of Queensbury is a defender of human rights in the House
of Lords, United Kingdom, as well as a prominent educationalist and
author. Baroness Cox was created a Life Peer in 1982 and has been
Deputy Speaker of the British Parliament’s House of Lords since
1985 to the present. She is Chancellor of Bournemouth University
and Vice President of the Royal College of Nursing and President of
the Institute of Administrative Management. Baroness Cox is heavily
involved with international humanitarian and human rights endeavours,
serving as non-executive director of the Andrei Sakharov Foundation
and as a trustee of MERLIN (Medical Emergency Relief International)
and is the President of Christian Solidarity Worldwide (P.O. Box 99,
New Malden, Surrey, KT3 3YF, England)

Stat ement by the Presidium of the Supreme Council of the
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic

On April 10, whilst representatives of the Russian Federation and
Islamic Republic of Iran were in Nagorno-Karabakh Republic with
the mediation mission, the National Army of Azerbaijan following a
sustained rocket and artillery bombardment made a massed attack with
the support of armoured forces and occupied a part of the Armenian
village, Maraga, in Martakert region. The enemy was repelled from
the Maraga and over the NKR border following a counter attack by
the NKR Forces of Defense. All inhabitants of the occupied part
of the village were brutally killed, and their homes looted and
burned. Up to now, 45 corpses, mostly old men and women have been
identified. The Azerbaijani leadership, motivated by political
ambitions, continues large-scale armed operations against NKR to
aid the process of electoral struggle. The peaceful population of
Maraga village was barbarically killed, although there had not been
any military necessity for such an event. This crime must not remain
unpunished, and the leadership of the Republic of Azerbaijan bears
full responsibility for the consequences of these actions.

Stepanakert, 12 April 1992

A Soldier of Independence April 24, 2006

In 1991 the Soviet Army and Azerbaijani military groupings were
the masters of the situation in the Shahumyan region. Under these
circumstances, Leonid and his comrades managed to carry out the
self-defense of Armenian villages.

The Liberation Army stood out compared to other military detachments
for its discipline. In the course of four years and dozens of battles,
Leonid lost six only soldiers. He trained his soldiers to be ready for
every hardship. Smoking and drinking were strictly prohibited. There
was no other detachment like this in Karabakh. His boys trained for
eight hours a day. He was preparing soldiers for a regular army.

Before combat he would always order, "Don’t shoot at unarmed people,"
and would add, "Don’t shoot at fleeing soldiers either. Let them go."

He gave that order the day the military station near the village
of Aghdaban was destroyed. That same day the Azerbaijanis came and
massacred the peaceful residents of the village of Maragha. Leonid
and his unit rushed to Maragha. The enemy suffered heavy losses and
retreated, leaving behind the villagers they had killed, dozens of
mutilated bodies of children, women, and old people.

Leonid admired the natural beauty of Karabakh and said, "Armenians have
no sense of beauty; if they had they wouldn’t have given up Karabakh,
for that reason alone. Giving something so beautiful away to somebody
else is a crime."

Leonid’s dream was to create a national army with a powerful Armenian
state behind it. But the Army was taking shape slowly at that time.

When we last met (it was after the opening of the Lachin corridor)
he said, "These victories will come to nothing because there is no
regular army behind them."

He could not reconcile himself to the surrender of the Shahumyan
region and parts of Martakert after the opening of the Lachin road.

The fact that some soldiers left these regions before the residents
did filled Leonid with rage. He said that they should be punished. He
was planning to liberate Shahumyan with his soldiers.

Leonid’s best friend and his favorite soldier was the commander of
the Artsakh Front unit of the Liberation Army, Vladimir Balayan.

Leonid considered Vladimir a born military expert. Vladimir Balayan
was killed on June 9, 1992 defending the village of Chailu in the
Martakert region. That day Leonid’s soldiers saw their commander
crying like a baby for the first and last time.

"He was killed, he went to the gods because they needed him there.

Therefore, we have to defend our country so that he doesn’t become
a martyr. He is a victim, not a martyr," Leonid told the people who
gathered for the funeral.

After Vladimir’s funeral, he didn’t speak to anybody for two hours;
he just stood by himself. Then he waved his hand and said, "I’ll go
and meet Vladimir there – in heaven."

Twelve days later Leonid Azgaldyan was killed.

On different occasions, Leonid used say, "The nation that loses
Karabakh will be completely overthrown."

Edik Baghdasaryan Photos by Frederic Karegin Tonolli, Myriam Gaume
Guragossian, Sarkis Hatspanian

Survivors of Maraghar massacre: It was truly like a contemporary
Golgotha many times over

The ancient kingdom of Armenia was the first nation to embrace
Christianity – in AD 301. Modern Armenia, formerly a Soviet republic,
declared autonomy in September 1991 and today exists as a member
of the Commonwealth of Independent States. There you find many of
the oldest churches in the world, and a people who have upheld the
faith for nearly 1,700 years, often at great cost. Nowhere has the
cost been greater than in the little piece of ancient Armenia called
Nagorno-Karabakh, cruelly cut off from the rest of Armenia by Stalin
in 1921, and isolated today as a Christian enclave within Islamic
Azerbaijan. Only 100 miles north to south, 50 miles east to west,
there are mountains, forests, fertile valleys, and an abundance of
ancient churches, monasteries, and beautifully carved stone crosses
dating from the fourth century. This paradise became hell in 1991.

Vying with Armenia for control of this enclave, Azerbaijan began a
policy of ethnic cleansing of the Armenians of Karabakh, and 150,000
Armenians were forced to fight for the right to live in their historic
homeland. It was a war against impossible odds: 7 million-strong
Azerbaijan, helped by Turkey and, at one stage, several thousand
mujahideen mercenaries. On April 10, 1992, forces from Azerbaijan
attacked the Armenian village of Maraghar in northeastern Karabakh.

The villagers awoke at 7 a.m. to the sound of heavy shelling; then
tanks rolled in, followed by infantry, followed by civilians with
pick-up trucks to take home the pickings of the looting they knew
would follow the eviction of the villagers. Azeri soldiers sawed
off the heads of 45 villagers, burnt others, took 100 women and
children away as hostages, looted and set fire to all the homes, and
left with all the pickings from the looting. I, along with my team
from Christian Solidarity Worldwide, arrived within hours to find
homes still smoldering, decapitated corpses, charred human remains,
and survivors in shock. This was truly like a contemporary Golgotha
many times over. I visited the nearby hospital and met the chief nurse.

Hours before, she had seen her son’s head sawn off, and she had lost
14 members of her extended family. I wept with her: there could be no
words. With the fragile cease-fire that began in May 1994, we have been
able to visit survivors of the massacre at Maraghar. Unable to return
to their village, which is still in Azeri hands, they are building
"New Maraghar" in the devastated ruins of another village.

Their "homes" are empty shells with no roofs, doors, or windows, but
their priority was the building of a memorial to those who died in the
massacre. We were greeted with the traditional Armenian ceremony of
gifts of bread and salt. Then a dignified elderly lady made a speech
of gracious welcome, with no hint of reference to personal suffering.

She seemed so serene that I thought she had been away on that terrible
day of the massacre. She replied: "As you have asked, I will tell you
that my four sons were killed that morning, trying to defend us – but
what could they do with hunting rifles against tanks? And then we saw
things no human should ever have to see: heads that were too far from
their bodies; people hacked into quarters like pigs. I also lost my
daughter and her husband-we only found his bloodstained cap. We still
don’t know what happened to them. I now bring up their children. But
they have forgotten the taste of milk, as the Azeris took all our
cows." How can one respond to such suffering and such dignity? Since
the cease-fire, we have undertaken a program to supply cows. On our
last visit, we met this grandmother, and, smiling, she said: "Thank
you. Our children now know the taste of milk." Nagorno-Karabakh is a
place where we have found miracles of grace. The day of the massacre
I asked the chief nurse, whose son had been beheaded, if she would
like me to take a message to the rest of the world. She nodded, and I
took out my notebook. With great dignity, she said: "I want to say,
‘Thank you.’ I am a nurse. I have seen how the medicines you have
brought have saved many lives and eased much suffering. I just want
to say, ‘Thank you,’ to all those who have not forgotten us in these
dark days."

Baroness Caroline Cox April 1998

ors-maraghar.htm

THE TRAGEDY OF MARAGHA

9 years ago – on April 10,1992, a tragedy, which, on different
estimations, caused 49-53 victims, took place in the village of
Maragha, Martakert region. 50 more people, including 9 children, were
taken hostages. The fate of many of them still remains unknown. The
Azerbaijani armed units – the OMON (militia units on special purpose)
detachments, which, supported by twenty tanks, had entered Maragha,
committed unprecedented by their cruelty crimes against peaceful
villagers. The massacre was resumed on April 22-23, when the survived
people of Maragha returned to bury the deceased ones. The facts on
the victims of Maragha have been confirmed by different international
human rights organizations, in particular, the organization Helsinki
Watch. Caroline Cox, Viced-Speaker of the British Parliament’s House of
Lords, visiting the tragedy place, witnessed how in the fully destroyed
village people were burying the remains of the cut up and sawed bodies,
as well as burned alive – adults and children. Later, Baroness Cox
described the atrocities of the Azerbaijanis in the village of Maragha
in her book "Ethnic Cleansing Is Going On". The tragedy of Maragha
is regarded as one of the most terrible examples of genocide.

.html

AZG Armenian Daily #037, 01/03/2006 Karabakh diary

PROVISIONAL COMMISSION IS NOT THERE TO DEMAND WAR INDEMNITY

At the last session of the NKR parliament the lawmakers passed a
law on setting up a provisional commission to study the Azerbaijani
violence against the Armenians of Nagorno Karabakh in the period
of 1988-1992. This decision is dictated by the need to present
Azerbaijan’s illegal acts before the world community, particularly
the OSCE Minsk Group and the PACE. The author of this initiative
was Vahram Atanesian, head of the Foreign Relations Committee of
the parliament. Mr. Atanesian told daily Azg that the commission
will work till the end of the year and the materials it will gather
during this period will be sent to international structures as well
as will be posted on the Internet. Suchlike commission was set up in
June 12 1992 too but it did not function because of the war and later
because of the sensitiveness of the peace talks. As today the sides
discuss humanitarian aspects of the conflict, the parliament sees it
rightful to present to the world community the massacre of Maragha
in 1992, the take-over of part of Shahumian and Martaker regions and
the humanitarian crisis that it incited. The most essential though
will be the study of notorious "Koltso" operation on May 15 1991
organized by the State Emergency Committee. Mr. Atanesian reminded
that at one point in time Russia’s Supreme Council also organized
hearings on "Koltso" operation. The researches of the provisional
commission by no means aim at demanding war indemnity from Azerbaijan,
as it is not within the parliament’s power. Vahram Atanesian thinks
that the government of Nagorno Karabakh has also to put before the
world community all facts of violence against the Azeri inhabitants
of Karabakh and the fact of considering them "second-rate citizens"
of the country. The parliamentarian explained that in exchange for
the evacuated Azeri population from Karabakh’s Azeri villages, Baku
authorities sent special militia units, terrorists and outlaws. He
assured that there are materials and videotapes to prove this.

http://www.maragha.nk.am/documentseng
http://www.168.am/en/articles/2070-pr
http://www.a1plus.am/en/?page=issue&am
http://www.cilicia.com/Maragha.htm
http://www.nkr.am/eng/mid/press/zparl.htm
http://sumgait.info/maraga/maraga-eng/surviv
http://www.nkr.am/eng/mid/bull/text1_01

Experiences As An Armenian Woman: International Women’s Month

EXPERIENCES AS AN ARMENIAN WOMAN: INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S MONTH
By Marine Mikayelyan

ianyan magazine

March 31 2010

Have you ever been asked, "If you had the chance to be reborn, what
ethnicity would you choose to be?" A pressing question like the one
Hamlet asked himself, "To be or not to be?" An automatic reaction to
this sort of a question prompts one to excavate through the former
files of their life to sort out the good and bad experiences of their
present ethnicity.

I, born an Armenian, occasionally find myself pondering this question,
especially because I am a woman. I emphasize my gender because I
believe it makes a difference in certain ethnicities. Therefore,
I, as an Armenian woman, consider the pros and cons of being born a
woman of Armenian descent. On this journey to answer such an impeding
question, I do hope to come to a certain realization.

Sometimes it is easier to look at the cup half empty, and so I will
start off this journey by giving a generalized synopsis of the cons
of being an Armenian woman. For instance, being an Armenian woman
comes with the responsibility, for the most part, of keeping up your
reputation. I am sure most Armenian woman have heard the warning that
it is "amot" (or shameful) to engage with the opposite sex frivolously
unless they are going to make it official by an engagement followed
by a wedding.

Armenian woman also should not be with an "odar" (someone outside
their ethnicity). It is still evident to this day that when you do
get married, that you are the "hars" (bride or daughter-in-law)
in the house and expected to be modest and keep your opinions to
yourself or worse- be completely deprived of them. You’re expected
to immediately have babies, cook as an iron chef, clean like you’re
Cinderella, and cater to the needs of your husband with all the while
feeling like this is what you’ve dreamed of your entire life.

A dress code also exists in the minds of Armenian people, mainly
dictating the length of your dress and the depth of your cleavage;
not to be too short and not be too deep. Your career choice can
be difficult considering you are expected to be a good mother and
a homemaker.

On top of all this, you’re also subjected to negative connotations
and exaggerations that spread like fire within the Armenian community.

This in turn all goes back to maintaining an acceptable reputation.

The choices you make in life are not solely based on what can be
good for you and make you happy but involve how they can impact your
immediate and sometimes extended family. As a woman, you have a lot
of different things to consider and worry about, especially if you
come from a more traditional family. I am sure some can relate to
having the thought cross their minds that it would be much easier to
be an American or even a man.

As a woman, you are expected to do it all and do it well. Falling
short of expectations puts great guilt upon your conscience. It is
like a programmed chip implanted in our brain from birth to feel
guilty about the smallest things. Even worse, the opposite sex does
not hold back to stimulate this so called chip.

Of course, wherever there is a cup half empty, there’s also a cup
that can be half full.

The Armenian woman, as I see it, is resilient despite the tug of
war that goes on between herself and traditional expectations of
her. I find that many are gifted nurturers and normally talented in
the cooking department, which makes me wonder if this can, perhaps,
be what underlines the ease of acquiring the role of a "hars."

Despite the typical expectations laid down by ancestors that is
still practiced today, I have seen many Armenian women defeat the
traditional obstacles, against all odds, and embrace their individual
identities. Nowadays, the Armenian woman is both a career woman and
a homemaker. Her ability to achieve success in all aspects of her
life without the worry of being disproved by her fellow Armenians
is reality. This is not to say that the Armenian woman is going to
extremes where she is rebelling against tradition, but there is more
open mindedness and she is becoming more fearless in standing up for
what she believes in and embracing her self identity. I am witnessing
more and more Armenian women define their own identity.

My late grandfather once advised me, "Be a manly woman". At first,
I thought, "Does he want me to gain more muscles?" As time went by I
realized he was telling me to be a woman that is not like a sheep;
to set goals and to achieve them with confidence. It is apparent
to me that most Armenian women do not want to be typical nor fall
victim under the stereotype of the above described cons, and have
been active towards positive change. Our ambitions are stepping ahead
of the limits set forth to define us. The traditional Armenian woman
survives in us while we break free of stereotypes.

We, as women, have come a long way to gain status. It is only harder
if you come from a traditional background.

I am proud of the Armenian woman.

if I were to be reborn I would be none other than an Armenian woman,
despite the frustrations felt when there’s judgment and double
standards, towards the female gender of this ethnicity. I feel it
makes life more interesting to have such complications, so I embrace
it. Well, to be or not to be? Yes, I will be, as I am.

http://www.ianyanmag.com/?p=2207

Turkey Will Not Be Lost To The West

TURKEY WILL NOT BE LOST TO THE WEST

Qantara.de
March 31 2010
Germany

The shift in Turkey’s foreign policy orientation towards the Middle
East has raised fears that the country could turn away from the West.

In his essay, Huseyin Bagci, professor of international politics at
the Technical University of Ankara, explains that despite appearances,
the USA and the EU remain Turkey’s most important partners

Even under Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey’s ultimate goal is to accede to
the European Union. Huseyin Bagci is of the opinion that the reforms
introduced to date have changed Turkey and that, for this reason,
the EU remains an important modernization factor for Turkey

| Turkey’s foreign policy has undergone so many "initiatives and
openings" in recent times that even the Turks themselves have
difficulty understanding where their country’s foreign policy is
actually heading. The steps taken by Prime Minister Erdogan are
surprising many observers. Only one thing is certain: Turkey has much
more self-confidence than ever before and already sees itself as a
regional and global player.

Foreign Minister Ahmed Davutoglu’s new foreign policy formula, which
could be summed up as "no problems with the neighbours", is starting
to bear fruit; at the same time, it is also raising fears that Turkey
could turn away from the West. Turkey is already a "political Mecca"
for the Islamic world and, at the same time, an indispensable partner
for the West.

Rooted as it is in the West in political, economic, technological and
cultural terms, Turkey has enjoyed more room to assert its influence
abroad since the end of the Cold War. No Turkish prime minister
before him has enjoyed such conducive foreign policy conditions as
Tayyip Erdogan.

Ultimate goal: accession

In terms of the EU’s geostrategic interests, Turkey remains
indispensable, even though both France and Germany are unwilling to
acknowledge this fact. The Turkish policy of both these countries is
neither creative nor result-oriented. Nevertheless, Turkey will not
walk away from the accession negotiation table.

Ankara should continue to push on with its reform process in order to
meet European standards. On the other hand, the EU must also fulfil
its obligations to Turkey. The relations between the European Union
and Ankara must be improved both in terms of their quality and their
quantity.

Accession to the EU remains the unswerving ultimate goal of Turkish
politics. From the Turkish point of view, it is no longer a question –
and has not been for a long time – of whether the country will become
a member of the EU; for Turkey, membership is practically a matter
of course.

The reforms introduced over the past 20 years have changed Turkey,
and the EU remains a very important modernization factor. At the same
time, the USA will remain Turkey’s most important partner in foreign
and security policy. Ankara’s new Kurdish policy and its opening up
towards Armenia can only succeed if Washington continues to operate
as a peacekeeper.

Other countries are also showing interest in Turkey. Ankara is also
an important partner for Russia in the field of energy and in terms
of its regional policy towards the Black Sea and the Caucasus. Russia
is Turkey’s most important trade partner; after Germany it is also
the second-biggest buyer of Russian natural gas.

| Bild:

By opening up to Syria, Iran and Iraq, Turkey has established itself
as a new regional player in the Middle East | Moscow support’s
Turkey’s decision to open up to Armenia. When the foreign ministers
of Armenia and Turkey signed a rapprochement agreement last October,
the Russian foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, was present. Public
opinion about Russia in Turkey has never been as positive as it is
at present. Nevertheless, Moscow is not a political alternative;
it is primarily an economic partner.

Turkey’s decision to improve relations with Syria, Iran, Iraq and
the entire Islamic world puts the country at the political centre of
the Middle East. Prime Minister Erdogan is the most popular political
figure among the Arab masses, but not necessarily among Arab regimes.

Tayyip Erdogan also acts as Israel’s most high-profile critic. The
Turkish-Israeli crisis was intentionally started by Erdogan, and he
is enjoying it. Moreover, Ankara does not intend to end its close
relationship with Iran just because the West does not approve of it.

Erdogan is pragmatic, and Iran is a good economic partner. At the same
time, Turkey would like to play the role of honest broker between
Iran and the USA. This is why Iran is using Turkey to break out of
its own political isolation. For Iran, Turkey is a springboard. Even
in Turkey, this has generated much severe criticism.

Regional power in the Middle East

Iraq and the Kurds in northern Iraq constitute a common problem for
the USA (as the protector of Baghdad) and Turkey. Iraq’s Kurds are
benefitting from the new Turkish policy to avoid, where possible,
all problems with neighbouring countries.

| Bild:

A new Kurdish policy: Ahmet Davutoglu became the first Turkish foreign
minister to visit the autonomous Kurdish region in northern Iraq when
he travelled there in October 2009 and met the Kurdish leader Massoud
Barzani | The visit of Turkish foreign minister, Ahmed Davutoglu, to
the Kurds in northern Iraq was an expression of this new policy. In
the long term, Turkey is Iraq’s best partner in the region. Turkey’s
recently concluded agreements with Syria, Iraq and Iran are mostly
economic in orientation and are a demonstration of Turkey’s "soft
power".

The reorientation of its Kurdish policy has both domestic and foreign
policy consequences for Turkey. It could mean the end of the PKK as
a terrorist organization; in any case, the Kurds are becoming more
self-confident.

Nevertheless, an independent Kurdish state is unlikely. That being
said, Turkey’s neighbours realise that the time for confrontation
has passed and the time for co-operation has arrived. In this regard,
Turkey can indeed be considered the peacemaker of the region.

In doing so, Ankara’s political pragmatism makes use of Islam and
the common cultural history of the Ottoman Empire. The debate about
"Neo-Ottomanism" also points in this direction. The intellectuals
and politicians of the Ottoman Empire believed in the mission of
modernizing both the Islamic world and the Middle East. This is the
political heritage of the current government in Ankara.

In this regard, Turkey will not be lost to the West. On the contrary,
Turkey is promoting common values in the Middle East. Turkey considers
itself to be the ambassador of democracy in the region and remains
firmly rooted in the West, even under Tayyip Erdogan.

Huseyin Bagci

© Neue Zurcher Zeitung / Qantara.de 2010

Translated from the German by Aingeal Flanagan
.php/_c-476/_nr-1311/i.html

http://www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article

USD 20 Million Invested In Water Supply Sphere In 2009

USD 20 MILLION INVESTED IN WATER SUPPLY SPHERE IN 2009

PanARMENIAN.Net
30.03.2010 20:53 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ In 2009, the following investments were extended
to Armenian water supply sphere: WB -USD 3,65 million; ADB -USD14,5
million; EBRD – Euro1 million, according to ArmVodokanal report.

"Currently we’re facing a number of tasks to be fulfilled in order
to improve water supply situation in Armenia," "ArmVodokanal" CJSC
Director General Patrick Lorin stated, summing up 2009 results.

Andranik Andreasyan, the chairman of RA state committee for water
industry, in turn, noted that the rate of investments must not be
slackened to enable improvements in Armenia’s water supply sphere.

In 2010, WB will allocate USD20 million to Armenia’s water supply
sphere; ADB and EBRD will extend USD36 million and Euro12 million
funding respectively.

Return Of Ambassador Is A Decision For Turkey To Make, U.S. State De

RETURN OF AMBASSADOR IS A DECISION FOR TURKEY TO MAKE, U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT SAYS

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
30.03.2010 12:16 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ He said the issue was part of the phone discussion
between U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Turkish Foreign
Minister Ahmet Davutoglu.

"Certainly, from our standpoint, we understand the reasons why Turkey
recalled its ambassador, and we hope that the ambassador will be
returned as quickly as Turkey feels comfortable," Mr. Crowley said.

Turkey recalled its ambassador to the U.S. after the adoption of the
Armenian Genocide resolution, H.Res.252, by the House panel on March
4, 2010.

Samvel Babayan: Azerbaijan Can Lose Half Of Its Territory In Case Of

SAMVEL BABAYAN: AZERBAIJAN CAN LOSE HALF OF ITS TERRITORY IN CASE OF NEW WAR

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
30.03.2010 15:07 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The course of Karabakh process prompts a military
solution, according to former NKR Defense Minister.

"Azerbaijan is a country which wants to have everything but give
nothing. So, I see no peaceful solution to the problem," Samvel
Babayan told reporters in Yerevan.

"Armenia prepares for war but refrains from parading it, unlike
Azerbaijan," he said, adding that Baku will never venture a new war.

"Azerbaijan knows that it can lose half of its territory in case it
resumes hostilities."

Asked whether Nagorno Karabakh may be re-engaged in the negotiation
process, he said the OSCE Minsk Group does not even try to exert any
kind of pressure on Baku in the issue. "Even if NKR rejoins talks,
nothing will change. We should have signed a final package back in
1994," he said.

The conflict between Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan broke out as
result of the ethnic cleansing the latter launched in the final years
of the Soviet Union. The Karabakh War was fought from 1991 (when the
Nagorno Karabakh Republic was proclaimed) to 1994 (when a ceasefire
was sealed by Armenia, NKR and Azerbaijan). Most of Nagorno Karabakh
and a security zone consisting of 7 regions is now under control
of NKR defense army. Armenia and Azerbaijan are holding peace talks
mediated by the OSCE Minsk Group up till now.

The OSCE Minsk Group was created in 1992 to encourage a peaceful,
negotiated resolution to the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. The Minsk
Group is headed by a Co-Chairmanship consisting of France, Russia and
the United States. The main objectives of the Minsk Process are as
follows: Providing an appropriate framework for conflict resolution
in the way of assuring the negotiation process supported by the Minsk
Group; Obtaining conclusion by the Parties of an agreement on the
cessation of the armed conflict in order to permit the convening of
the Minsk Conference; Promoting the peace process by deploying OSCE
multinational peacekeeping forces.

BAKU: Turkish PM: Turkey Waits For Armenia’s Response To Letter To C

TURKISH PM: TURKEY WAITS FOR ARMENIA’S RESPONSE TO LETTER TO CONDUCT JOINT INVESTIGATION

Today
March 30 2010
Azerbaijan

During a press conference, conducted during the visit of German
Chancellor Angela Merkel, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
said, Turkish fovernment is waiting for a response from the Armenian
government to the letter sent regarding the establishment of a joint
commission of historians to study the question of the fictional
"genocide."

"We expect the Armenian response to a letter sent to investigate
"genocide"," Erdogan said.

The Prime Minister also told that he had discussions with Chancellor
Angela Merkel regarding fictional "genocide".

ANTELIAS: Sunday School students celebrate the feast of St. Gregory

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Director
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E- mail: [email protected]
Web:

PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon

Watch our latest videos on YouTube here:

SUNDAY SCHOOL STUDENTS CELEBRATE THE FEAST OF ST. GREGORY THE ILLUMINATOR IN
ANTELIAS

On Saturday 20 March 2010, after the Vesper service, during the vigil the
students of Sunday Schools of the Diocese of Lebanon organized a spiritual
evening around the life of Saint Gregory for the pilgrims. The youth choir
"shoghagat" of the Diocese of Beirut chanted prayers written by the Saint
and sang hymns for the day of the Saint. At the end, Archbishop Komitas
Ohanian Grand Sacristan of the Catholicosate prayed with the pilgrims
beseeching God to show His mercy to all those who had come to identify with
the sufferings of the Saint while he was in the pit of Khor Virap.

##
View the photos here:
tos/Photos457.htm
*****
The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the Sunday
Schools of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer to the web page of the
Catholicosate, The Cilician
Catholicosate, the administrative center of the church is located in
Antelias, Lebanon.

http://www.ArmenianOrthodoxChurch.org/
http://www.youtube.com/user/HolySeeOfCilicia
http://www.ArmenianOrthodoxChurch.org/v04/doc/Pho
http://www.ArmenianOrthodoxChurch.org

Armenian expert: 11% in 7 months is not 11% already

Armenian expert: 11% in 7 months is not 11% already

2010-03-26 12:30:00

ArmInfo. 11% increase of pensions, announced by the government of
Armenia, may be actually "choked off" by inflation to a certain
degree, expert on the management issues, candidate of technical
sciences Harutyun Mesropyan said today when commenting on the upcoming
rise in gas prices in Armenia started April 1. To note, the country’s
government made a decision at March 26 session on increasing the base
rate of the labour pension by 2,5 thsd drams (or by almost 11%) from
November 1, 2010, as well as the social allowances by 3,000 drams
(about 15%) from May 1 to compensate the rise in gas prices. "The gas
price is currently rising, the prices will keep on growing during the
year, and the pensions will be increased just from November. That is,
the actual purchasing capacity of this increase will be not 11% but,
for example, 8 or 9%", Mesropyan said.

To recall, the gas price started April 1, 2010, will be increased in
Armenia from $154 to $180 per 1,000 cub m. The gas tariff for the
private consumers, using less than 10,000 cub m of gas per month, will
grow from 96,000 to 132,000 drams (about $335 at the current rate) per
1,000 cub m, VAT inclusive.