Skip to main content

Azerbaijani President Defends Checkpoint Construction On Disputed Nagorno-Karabakh Road

 (@FahadShabbir) 

Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev on Thursday defended the construction of a checkpoint on the only road leading from Armenia to the Armenian-dominated conflict-torn Nagorno-Karabakh region as his country’s legitimate right

MOSCOW (UrduPoint News / Sputnik – 27th April, 2023) Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev on Thursday defended the construction of a checkpoint on the only road leading from Armenia to the Armenian-dominated conflict-torn Nagorno-Karabakh region as his country’s legitimate right.

The president told a press conference alongside French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna that Armenia had misused the Lachin corridor by transporting ammunition and other military goods.

He argued that the “opening of the checkpoint on the Azerbaijan-Armenia border, at the beginning of the Lachin-Khankendi (Stepanakert) road is the manifestation of the fact that Azerbaijan had ensured its sovereignty and territorial integrity,” according to the presidency’s press office.

Armenia and Azerbaijan engaged in a bloody military conflict for the control of the mountainous Nagorno-Karabakh in fall 2020.

It ended in a Russia-brokered truce that saw the self-proclaimed Republic of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) cede parts of the region to Baku. Russia also sent peacekeepers to the region.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said on Thursday that Azerbaijan’s unilateral establishment of a checkpoint along the Lachin corridor was another act of what he described as ethnic cleansing committed against the region’s majority ethnic Armenian population. Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry called his accusations “nonsensical.”

The top French diplomat, who arrived in Azerbaijan on Wednesday for the first leg of her South Caucasus tour, urged Azerbaijan to unblock the Lachin corridor. She called for talks between the regional rivals and promised support of Azerbaijan’s peace initiative. She will next visit Armenia and wrap up her trip in Georgia on Friday.

https://www.urdupoint.com/en/world/azerbaijani-president-defends-checkpoint-cons-1683022.html


Asbarez: Baku’s Claims of Armenians Transporting Arms to Artsakh Denied

A screen shot from a video released by Baku alleging Armenian arms transports to Artsakh


Azerbaijan claimed that an Armenian Army military convoy, accompanied by Russian peacekeeping units, had entered Karabakh on Friday, accusing Yerevan of transporting arms to Artsakh.

Armenia’s Defense Ministry, as well as Artsakh authorities slammed Baku for continuing its misinformation campaign and advancing its aggressive policies in the region.

“All claims by the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry regarding the transfer of personnel, weapons and military equipment of the Armed Forces of Armenia are also false,” Armenia’s defense ministry said in a statement.

Artsakh Interior Ministry called the Azerbaijani claims false and explained in a Facebook post that the movement depicted in a video posted by Baku depicted the transport of cargo internally within Artsakh, explaining that the only road connecting Artsakh to Armenia—the Lachin Corridor—remained blockaded since December 12.

“In the video published by them [Azerbaijan], a water truck can be seen, with which it is definitely not possible to transport weapons,” added the Artsakh statement.

“Thus, Azerbaijan is misleading the international community by representing the transportation of humanitarian goods and internal movements as the transportation of military equipment and ammunition,” said Artsakh’s Interior Ministry.

“On the other hand by violating the ceasefire almost every day, the Azerbaijani armed forces are opening fire even at civilians in Artsakh, halting all farming activities,” the Facebook message says.

Pashinyan signals readiness to sign Yerevan’s draft of peace agreement with Baku

 TASS 
Russia –
Armenia and Azerbaijan have exchanged drafts of a peace agreement several times through international mediators

YEREVAN, April 21. /TASS/. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is poised to put his signature on Armenia’s draft of the peace agreement with Azerbaijan, but Baku is not reciprocating, Pashinyan said at the parliament on Friday.

“I am ready to sign the document which we submitted to the Azerbaijani side, but Azerbaijan is not accepting it. We have to decide what to do. We have enough legitimacy, a sufficient mandate to make decisions concerning Armenia’s future,” he said.

Armenia and Azerbaijan have exchanged drafts of a peace agreement several times through international mediators.

Leaked files suggest US was closely monitoring UN Secretary General – BBC

Save

Share

 10:40,

YEREVAN, APRIL 13, ARMENPRESS. The US believes the UN Secretary General is too willing to accommodate Russian interests, BBC reported citing fresh revelations in classified documents leaked online.

The files suggest Washington has been closely monitoring Antonio Guterres.

Several documents describe private communications involving Guterres and his deputy.

It is the latest from a leak of secret documents.

The documents contain candid observations from Guterres about the war in Ukraine and a number of African leaders.

One leaked document focuses on the Black Sea grain deal, brokered by the UN and Turkey in July following fears of a global food crisis.

It suggests that Guterres was so keen to preserve the deal that he was willing to accommodate Russia’s interests.

“Guterres emphasised his efforts to improve Russia’s ability to export,” BBC quoted the document as saying, “even if that involves sanctioned Russian entities or individuals.”

His actions in February, according to the assessment, were “undermining broader efforts to hold Moscow accountable for its actions in Ukraine.”

Saying he wouldn’t comment on leaked documents, one senior UN official told the BBC the UN was “driven by the need to mitigate the impact of the war on the world’s poorest.”

“That means doing what we can to drive down the price of food,” he added, “and to ensure that fertiliser is accessible to those countries that need it the most.”

Russian grain and fertilizer are not subject to international sanctions, but Russia says it has experienced difficulties with securing shipping and insurance.

UN officials say that Guterres has made his opposition to Russia’s war very clear.

Another document from mid-February describes a frank conversation between Guterres and his deputy, Amina Mohammed.

In it, Guterres expresses “dismay” at a call from the European Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen, for Europe to produce more weapons and ammunition as a result of the war in Ukraine.

US national security spokesperson John Kirby told the BBC that the US government was scrambling to get to the bottom of the leaks.

“This was a series of dangerous leaks. We don’t know who’s responsible, we don’t know why. And we are assessing the national security implications, and right now there is also a criminal investigation,” he said on Wednesday.

Washington was “reaching out actively” to allies to answer questions they have about the leaks, so they know “how seriously we are taking this”, he added.

Kirby said that while the authenticity of some of the documents had yet to be established, they “certainly appear to have come from various source of intelligence across the government”.

The leaked documents allegedly expose the extent of US spying on key allies and partners, including South Korea and Israel, among other information.

Under Netanyahu, violence against Christians is being normalised


April 9 2023

Never have Israeli attackers felt more emboldened than under the new government, Christian leaders say.

Jerusalem – Nothing about the attack or what happened since surprised Miran Krikorian. The Armenian owner of Taboon and Wine Bar in the Old City of Jerusalem was not surprised to receive a call the night of January 26 that a mob of Israeli settlers was attacking his bar in the Christian Quarter and shouting “Death to Arabs … Death to Christians.”

It didn’t surprise him how little effort the police made to catch the perpetrators; after some press about the attack and a lack of arrests, police told him two months later they detained three of the suspects among the mob. But they also asked for his surveillance video, despite the videos being already online and surveillance cameras omnipresent in the Old City.

“You have cameras over here that can show the underwear that someone is wearing, so how come you’re asking for my footage two months later?” asked Krikorian.

It was easy for him to identify many of the perpetrators himself – they went online and gave his restaurant a 1-star review minutes after the attack – but when he went to the police station that night, the officer there scolded him: “Don’t bother me too much.”

A couple of days later, Armenians leaving a memorial service in the Armenian Quarter say they were attacked by Israeli settlers carrying sticks. An Armenian was pepper-sprayed as settlers scaled the walls of the Armenian convent, trying to take down its flag, which had a cross on it. When Armenians chased them away, the settlers began shouting: “Terrorist attack,” prompting nearby border police to draw their guns on the Armenians, beating and detaining one of them.

“Instead of [the soldiers] calming or condemning [the settlers], I was looking into the eyes of the soldier and telling him to calm down,” one of the attacked Armenian youth told Al Jazeera.

Hostility by fundamentalist Jews towards Jerusalem’s Christian community is not new, and it is not just Armenian Christians who suffer from it. Priests of all denominations describe being spat at for years. Since 2005, Christian celebrations around Holy Week, particularly Holy Fire Saturday, have brought military barricades and harsh treatment from soldiers and settlers alike, with the number of worshippers allowed inside the Church of the Holy Sepulchre drastically limited, from as many as 11,000 historically during the Holy Fire ceremony to now 1,800 since last year, with authorities citing safety concerns.

But since Israel’s new government – the most right wing and religious in its history – came to power, incidents against Christians in Jerusalem have reportedly become more violent and common. At the beginning of the year, 30 Christian graves at the Protestant Mount Zion Cemetery were desecrated. In the Armenian Quarter, vandals spray-painted “Death to Arabs, Christians and Armenians,” on the walls.

At the Church of the Flagellation, someone attacked a statue of Jesus with a hammer. Last month, an Israeli came to the Church of Gethsemane during Sunday religious services and tried to attack the priest with an iron bar. Being spat and shouted at by Israelis has become, for some Christians, “a daily occurrence”.

Most of the time, victims of these incidents say little is done by police to catch or punish attackers.

“My fear is that these perpetrators are known, but they enjoy impunity,” said Munib Younan, bishop emeritus of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. “That’s the reason they are doing this.”

Church and community leaders note that police do little to investigate, and dismiss or minimise the religious and ideological motivations behind these attacks, typically saying the perpetrators suffer from mental illness.

“The man who tried to [throw] tomatoes in our Church of Gethsemane in 2020, it was the same – he was taken for a while, and then he was declared mentally ill. So, what can we do?” remarked Friar Francesco Patton, custodian of the Holy Land.

Forced to take matters into his own hands, Patton, who is tasked with protecting some 80 sites in Jerusalem, says the Franciscans have reluctantly set up cameras in all corners of their holy sites, which are becoming more closed off from the public due to the persistent attacks.

“This is not the Franciscan spirituality … of welcoming,” he said. “But we have to take care of the [holy] places and people who come to pray and worship.”

Ideologically, the primary source for this targeting of Christians and their holy sites comes from the education of certain ultra-religious Jewish groups, according to community and church leaders. Most attacks come from a small minority of teenage yeshiva students, they say.

“Their mind is obsessed with the ‘Messianic syndrome’. They want to take over the whole land,” said Greek Orthodox Patriarch Theophilos III of Jerusalem. “When you see young people, 15 or 16 years old, and they do all sorts of things and they’re not afraid, someone is behind it.”

The targeting of Christian symbols – especially the cross, with harassers often calling Christians “pagans” or “idol worshippers” – isn’t new either, but never have the attackers felt more emboldened than under the new government. After a recent spitting incident, an argument ensued, and the settler flashed his gun at the Christians. As a friend of theirs put it, the message was clear: “I can do anything I want and claim self-defence.”

“The minister of national security is a lawyer who used to defend extremist Jews attacking Christian and other sites,” said one Armenian youth who says they were attacked in January, referring to Itamar Ben-Gvir. “What do you expect when the highest-ranking official in the equation is the most extremist?”

All of this is happening “in the grips of the most serious crisis between Israel and the churches since 1948”, said Daniel Seidemann, a Jerusalem lawyer intimately involved in discussions with state and institutional delegations. “Nobody is talking to the churches.”

This comes as the Israeli government continues to seek to transform Christian sites at the Mount of Olives into a national park — which church officials say will strip their rights as owners of these sites and hand them over to settler interests.

Church statements are growing more direct, at times fiercely critical of the government. “What we call the status quo, the balance between the different [communities] … now is not any more respected,” declared Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin patriarch of Jerusalem.

Jerusalem’s Christian population has been threatened for years – it is currently about 10,000, or just over one percent of the city’s population, compared with a quarter of the population a century ago. Many have left, seeking a more secure future elsewhere as the empowerment of far-right religious figures such as Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich only tears Jerusalem apart and marginalises Christians further.

Church leaders describe a situation where religious issues are becoming more politicised, while political issues are driven more intensely by religious zealotry. “These people want to change the political conflict in Jerusalem into a religious one where nobody is a winner except extremists,” said Bishop Younan of the Lutheran Church.

“Religion should forgive, should invite to peace, to concord, to reconciliation, to forgiveness,” added Auxiliary Bishop William Shomali of the Latin Patriarchate. “But when religion becomes ideology, this is what happens: hatred.”

Christians have been emigrating from the Holy Land for economic and security reasons for decades. After big waves of emigration caused by the 1948 Nakba and the 1967 war, there has been a steady trickle of Christians leaving. Efforts within the community to preserve the Christian presence in Jerusalem, including careful ownership of properties by churches and others, have helped the Christian population in Jerusalem stabilise somewhat.

But residents already dealing with high costs of living ask themselves if they should endure the verbal and physical assaults to maintain the Christian presence, or emigrate.

“We are the weakest one, so maybe it’s a way of accelerating the emigration to leave the country,” said Krikorian, the bar owner, who personally “love[s]” living in the Old City. “It’s working. Honestly speaking, it’s working.”

Community mobilisation has been difficult with what can be a fragmented community divided among 13 churches. Gabi Hani, 53, a Palestinian Christian Jerusalemite who owns Versavee Restaurant near Jaffa Gate in the Old City, commends the increased visibility and statements of church leaders recently but believes a clear vision is still lacking.

“I think we are a bit lost,” said Hani. “We don’t have a single leader to provide a kind of unified strategy. But people defend themselves, and just to stay here is already the winning strategy.”

Palestinian and Armenian Christians feel ignored by the world, and for church officials engaging in the diplomatic arena, the response often rings hollow. “[Foreign countries] are shy,” said Shomali of the Latin Patriarchate. “Americans are the strongest because there is a special relationship between Israel and the United States. But Europe is shy – they talk, but without exerting any pressure.”

The Armenian scouts march through the Old City of Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, April 2, 2023. Scout leader Hagop Djernazian appears on the left [Lucien Lung/Al Jazeera]

Finding someone to take the lead on protecting Christians can be tricky. Speak to community members, and they will call for churches or foreign states tasked with protecting Christian sites – like Belgium, France, Italy, Jordan, and Spain – to take more action. Speak to church leaders, and they say there is little they can do beyond making statements and communicating their deepening concerns to foreign states. Ask diplomats, and they say they are following the lead of church officials – a circle of finger-pointing responsibility that results in little action.

“There’s more consciousness of the issues,” said one diplomat in Jerusalem. “Some key people have played a role there on the church side, but it hasn’t been effective. Although, what diplomatic action here has been effective?”

Other issues afflicting Jerusalem and the region at the moment – including violence at Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Israeli government’s proposed judicial amendments – are higher priorities for diplomatic missions. However, according to a diplomat speaking off the record, threats against church property are one of the few areas where there can be pushback in the US, even from Republicans against Israel’s efforts to Judaise Jerusalem.

But those involved in diplomatic discussions say violence against Christians is unlikely to be the animating force for foreign missions.

Christians in Jerusalem are starting to increase engagement within and between communities. Following the violent incidents towards the Armenian community – victims of a disproportionate number of attacks because their quarter is adjacent to the Jewish Quarter – they started a WhatsApp group to alert each other of threats or incidents.

Hagop Djernazian, 23, leads the Armenian Scouts. He has been engaging Scout groups across denominations, organising joint camps for the first time. As a show of solidarity, he brought the Orthodox Armenian Scouts to last week’s Catholic Palm Sunday. Ten Scout groups joined the procession, double the participation from last year.

“The new generation is growing up with the idea that Christians must cooperate with each other in the city to keep the Christian presence,” said Dzernian. “If we keep saying that we will work alone, we will lose in the end.”

In the wider context of government efforts to Judaise Jerusalem, a solidarity of “others” is likewise reinforced. “Christians, Muslims, Arabs, Armenians – they include us in one package,” said Dzernian.

Many community members and leaders like Latin Patriarch Pizzaballa expect the violence to continue or worsen in the weeks ahead. Some Christians, inevitably, will leave. But through the pressure, a collective identity is strengthening – both as part of the longstanding “mosaic” of Jerusalem’s multiethnic, multireligious character, and as Christians in the Holy Land.

“Occupation makes people very cold, very separate. ‘I am [Syriac], I am Catholic, I am Orthodox, I am Evangelist’,” remarked Hani the restaurant owner. “But with the threats, the violence, the vandalism, now the people are coming together. The churches are waking up. We were blind for 50 years, but no more.”

https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2023/4/9/under-netanyahu-violence-against-christians-is-being-normalised








AW: US intelligence community confirms Azerbaijan as South Caucasus aggressor

The Office of the US Director of National Intelligence, in an unclassified report released this week, confirms that Azerbaijan is the aggressor in the South Caucasus.

WASHINGTON, DC — The US intelligence community has definitively identified Azerbaijan as the primary threat to peace in the South Caucasus, in an intelligence report (unclassified version) required by Congress through the legislative leadership of Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and the civic society support of the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA).

“Our U.S. intelligence community confirms what we know to be true, that Azerbaijan’s the aggressor,” stated ANCA executive director Aram Hamparian. “This definitive finding by the Director of National Intelligence takes a wrecking ball a longstanding State Department’s false-parity narrative that – against all evidence – emboldens Aliyev’s aggression by answering each new Azerbaijani attack with generic calls, anemic pleas, on all parties to refrain from violence. This intentionally weak policy of artificial evenhandedness –nothing more than outright hostility disguised as neutrality – emboldens Aliyev’s aggression and sets back the cause of a durable and democratic peace.”

The report, released in unclassified form earlier this week, prepared by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), states, “In the South Caucasus region, Azerbaijan is the country most likely to renew large-scale conflict in an effort to consolidate and expand the gains it won in its 2020 military action against Armenia over the disputed territory of Nagorno Karabakh.”

The report continues, “Azerbaijan in mid­ September 2022 initiated a widespread assault along the international border with Armenia, striking as far as 25 miles into Armenian territory. The ceasefire reached on 14 September is largely holding, but could easily fray as each side continues to accuse each other of firing heavy artillery. Despite the September violence, during which at least 207 Armenians and 80 Azerbaijani soldiers were killed, internationally brokered diplomatic engagement has resumed, which we assess helps to mitigate the risk of further escalation.”

The report follows Rep. Schiff-led efforts to include ANCA-backed language in the Intelligence Authorization Act, calling for “a report assessing the likelihood of a South Caucasus country taking military action against another country (including in Nagorno-Karabakh or any other disputed territory). Such report shall include an indication of the strategic balance in the region, including with respect to the offensive military capabilities of each South Caucasus country.”

The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) is the largest and most influential Armenian-American grassroots organization. Working in coordination with a network of offices, chapters and supporters throughout the United States and affiliated organizations around the world, the ANCA actively advances the concerns of the Armenian American community on a broad range of issues.

Russia Lashes Out At Armenia For Drawing Closer To The International Criminal Court

April 5 2023


On March 17, 2023, the International Criminal Court (ICC) announced that it had issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin for war crimes, accusing him of personal responsibility for the abductions of children from Ukraine.[1]

On March 24, the Armenian Constitutional Court ruled that the Rome Statute, on which the ICC is predicated, complies with the Armenian Constitution, paving the way for the country’s ratification of the founding treaty of the ICC.[2] This decision caused indignation in Moscow as Yerevan appeared to be endorsing an organization that Moscow had denounced as a vestige of Western attempts to impose a self-serving rules-based order on everyone else. It did not impress Moscow that Armenia’s possible ratification of the ICC treaty was not aimed at Russia and its leader but rather at Azerbaijan – a country Armenia had accused of war crimes perpetrated in the Nagorno Karabakh war.

An anonymous Russian foreign ministry source told both major Russian news agencies, TASS and RIA Novosti, that “Moscow considers completely unacceptable the plans by official Yerevan to join the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court given the background of the recent illegal and legally void ICC ‘warrants’ against the Russian leadership.”

The source warned the Armenian side of “the extremely negative” consequences of its actions for bilateral relations.[3]

At her March 30 weekly briefing, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova, commented on the relations between Armenia and the ICC. She was less menacing than the anonymous source. “The topic is a subject of discussion during high-level contacts both in Moscow and in Yerevan. We do not consider it necessary to disclose details. We assume that the issue will be settled in a collegial and mutually acceptable manner.”[4]

An article in the online conservative business daily Vzglyad accused the Armenian government of political myopia and claimed that Armenian prime minister Nikol Pashinyan had taken this step as a deliberate affront to Moscow.

The article cited the criticism of the decision by the opposition Republican Party of Armenia (RPA). That party’s executive committee blasted the decision to join the ICC since, according to RPA, the court in The Hague “is a highly politicized body, and it is no accident that even such powerful nations such as the U.S., China, and Russia, which are permanent member-states of the UN Security Council, have not signed or ratified the statute and do not intend to do so in the future.”

“To believe that accession to this court’s [statute] could be ever used in order to protect interests of Armenia is a sign of an obvious political myopia,” declared the article in Vzglyad.  It also noted that the Republican party’s leadership had traditionally maintained good relations with Russia.

Russia asserted that the Armenian Constitutional court was staffed with Pashinyan supporters. Konstantin Zatulin, the first deputy chairman of the State Duma committee on CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States) Affairs, Eurasian Integration, and Relations with Compatriots, claimed that Pashinyan and his supporters had forced the court’s previous chairman, Grair Tovmasyan, to step down. Therefore, Zatulin was convinced that Pashinyan himself was behind the “scandalous” Constitutional Court decision that provoked Moscow’s anger.

According to Zatulin, since Pashinyan had secured the complete obedience of the Constitutional court by packing the court with his supporters, “It’s hard to argue Armenian Constitutional court’s independence. It became known that in summer 2020, its previous chairman was ostracized. Personal pressure focused on him and his family was orchestrated. It was all done to secure his stepping down from the court chairman’s office. As a result, the Constitutional Court was transformed into the government’s appendage.”

Political analyst Marat Bashirov claimed that Yerevan had played one game too many with the Kremlin and scoffed at Yerevan’s reassurances to Russia that were belied by statements by members  of Pashinyan’s own party: “Government’s deputies do not hesitate to say in interviews that Putin should be arrested if he comes to Armenia.”

The article did cite some Armenian reassurances that the decision still had to pass parliament and this vote would be deferred indefinitely and that ratification did not mean that Putin faced arrest in Armenia. However, the article did not find these clarifications convincing.

The decision reflected a clear anti-Russian trend in Armenia, according to Vadim Trukhachev, Associate Professor at the Department of Foreign Regional Studies and Foreign Policy of the Russian State University for the Humanities. He stated that “In Yerevan, Russia is perceived as a foreign state, with which one should communicate only on the basis of pragmatic interests. And in this regard the ‘divorce’ of the countries becomes unavoidable.”

Trukhachev claimed that Moscow had ways of punishing Armenia. “Naturally, Moscow won’t turn a blind eye to such a decision. Russia could revise its migration policy towards the Caucasian republic, since quite a few citizens of that country still come to us for work. Another direction for our response could be the reduction of investment flows to Armenia,” suggested Trukhachev.

For his part, Zatulin claimed that Pashinyan despite any protestations on his part was hostile to Russia. “I never believed in Pashinyan’s pro-Russian stance. Before he came to power in 2018, he built his career on [verbal] attacks on Moscow, talking about how a Russian military base in Armenia was not necessary and that it was imprudent for the country [Armenia] to be a CSTO [Collective Security Treaty Organization] member… Now things that Pashinyan’s entourage has been dreaming about for a long time and gradually tried to implement have been revealed,” said Zatulin.

“Pashinyan’s supporters have taken a clearly anti-Russian measure. By passing this Constitutional court decision, they hint that they may declare the Russian head of state ‘persona non grata.'” The text asserted that Pashinyan was exploiting Russia’s preoccupation with Ukraine to switch sides to the West for the sole purpose of retaining power.

A further indication of Pashinyan’s unfaithfulness was his acceptance of U.S. President Joe Biden’s invitation to attend the online “Summit for Democracy.”[5]

Political scientist and columnist Georgy Bovt viewed the ICC issue as a red herring: “In this case the decision was prepared for a long time and was not taken at all in order to arrest Vladimir Putin. The other day, the Chairman of the National Assembly of Armenia Alen Simonyan said that he could not imagine a situation in which the President of Russia could be arrested if he visits any country, noting that the decision of the ICC is more of a political or historical nature. However, as far as we know, there have been no such statements at the level of the executive branch.

“Armenia, by the way, is far from being the only country ‘friendly’ to Russia that has ratified the Rome Statute. Of the CIS countries, it was joined by Moldova, with whom relations are already difficult, and also by Tajikistan. It has also been ratified by Venezuela, Serbia, and South Africa. The latter will host the next BRICS summit, to which Putin has already been officially invited. None of these countries were quick to issue an unequivocal statement that they would never execute a warrant for the arrest of the Russian leader, which would openly violate their obligations to the International Criminal Court. Although there were precedents. It’s just that such things are usually discussed through closed diplomatic channels, through which appropriate guarantees are also given. Or not given.”

According to Bovt, the problems in relations between Yerevan and Moscow lay elsewhere. “In the case of Armenia, the point is also that bilateral political relations are already beset by a number of problems. The main one is Yerevan’s open dissatisfaction with the way Russian peacekeepers fulfill, or rather, do not fulfill, as they believe in Yerevan, their obligations in Nagorno-Karabakh. And earlier, according to the Armenian leadership, Moscow did not do enough to protect Armenia from Azerbaijan in the war in the fall of 2020, neglecting its obligations under the CSTO. Now Yerevan is openly dissatisfied with the fact that Russian peacekeepers are not taking any measures to unblock the Lachin corridor, which is the only road connecting Nagorno-Karabakh with the outside world. For almost four months this road has been blocked by Azerbaijani environmental activists, who are clearly acting in concert with official Baku. As a result, there was a shortage of medicine in Nagorno-Karabakh, a rationing system was introduced, filling stations were closed, electricity and gas were periodically cut off.

“In turn, Yerevan has taken a number of steps in recent months that are designed to demonstrate dissatisfaction with how the CSTO mechanism works in general, in terms of protecting its member from Azerbaijan’s actions. So, in November of last year, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan refused to sign the draft declaration of the CSTO Collective Security Council. Earlier, in September, the Armenian authorities refused to participate in the CSTO exercises in Kazakhstan. At the beginning of this year, the Armenian Defense Ministry informed the CSTO about the inexpediency of holding the organization’s exercises in the country. Moreover, the Russian Ministry of Defense reported that a joint exercise of the CSTO peacekeeping contingents “Indestructible Brotherhood – 2023” is planned to be held on Armenian territory.

“And now it turns out that the ‘brotherhood’ no longer looks so indestructible. This gives rise to rumors about a possible withdrawal of Armenia from the CSTO, which does not look so unbelievable now. Especially if Yerevan receives guaranty of its security not from Russia, but from the E.U. and the U.S.”[6]

Russia hinted at retaliatory measures that could hurt Armenia. On March 31, 2023, the Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Supervision (Rosselkhoznadzor) reported on its website on negotiations between the veterinary services of the Russian Federation and Armenia, “during which the results of the inspection of milk processing enterprises in Armenia conducted from March 20 to 24, 2023, were discussed.”

“During the meeting, the question was raised about the impossibility of the Armenian veterinary service to guarantee the safety of dairy products for Russian recipients. Considering the results of the negotiations and the unsatisfactory results of the inspection (the department announced them on March 28), Rosselkhoznadzor requested the Armenian veterinary service to suspend certification of dairy products to Russia from all enterprises in the country starting on April 5, 2023. The possibility of resuming supplies will be discussed further, based on the results of the work carried out by the Armenian side to eliminate the identified violations.”[7]

Moscow has used the issue of sanitary and product safety authorities before when it wanted to apply pressure. For example, during the low point in relations with Turkey, import of Turkish tomatoes were banned.[8]

The Armenian opposition deputy and the former minister of agriculture Artur Khachatryan took the hint: “The decision to publicize the problem rather than solve it in a work-like fashion already attests to the existence of contradictions that are unrelated to the Russian and Armenian supervisory authorities. Most likely, we are talking about contradictions at a higher political level.”

Armenia was vulnerable to such pressures. Armenian economist Armen Ktoyan told the Russian daily Kommersant: “Armenian producers will be dealt a double blow. Firstly, the ban on the import of dairy products weakens the positions of Armenian producers in the Russian market. It will be difficult to come back and occupy a [market] niche again. Secondly, it is impossible to immediately reorient exports to other markets. The potential market is the EU, but there are a lot of regulations that need to be met, and no work has been done in this direction.”

Ktoyan expressed concern that if political contradictions continue to increase, Russia could extend the ban to other products: “We understand and know that the Rosselkhoznadzor makes certain decisions that are  also based on the political situation.”[9]

Armenia scrambled to contain the situation. The Armenian Parliament’s Deputy Speaker Hakob Arshakyan proposed to the Russian Federation to sign an agreement that would serve as a firewall against ICC decisions. Arshakyan said that Yerevan had heard Moscow’s concerns about the impact of Armenia’s ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court would have on bilateral relations. Armenia’s action did not center on Russia but were related solely with the actions of Azerbaijan.

“As recently as today, we signed an agreement with another country, according to which the Rome Statute will not affect our bilateral relations. Such a settlement can be concluded with Russia as well. But this is just one of the options. There are other options. One thing is clear: we have heard the concerns expressed by the Russian Federation, and I think that we will be able to ensure that [ratifying the Rome Statute]  does not damage the strategic relations between Armenia and Russia.”[10]

Commenting on the topic of Vladimir Putin’s possible arrest if he visits Armenia after the ratification of the Rome Statute, Mr. Arshakyan replied: “Naturally, the ruling party and team have no such intention or desire.”[11]

The Director of the Caucasus Institute Alexander Iskandaryan believes that options exist that could allow Yerevan and Moscow to clear the issue of the ICC. In any case, the arrest of the president of a nuclear power was an impossibility. “In political reality, it is impossible to imagine this. Therefore, Yerevan can either simply postpone the ratification of the Rome Statute, or the parties can find some legal loophole and use it.” Iskandaryan also warned Moscow that the longer the issue festered, the more it could be exploited by others. “Another thing is that any such tempest in a teacup leaves its sediment in Armenian-Russian relations, and third parties are trying to take advantage of it.”[12]

 


[1] Apnews.com, March 18, 2023.

[2] Lemonde.fr, March 29, 2023.

[3] Tass.ru, March 27, 2023

[4] Kommersant.ru, April 3, 2023.

[5] Vz.ru, March 29, 2023.

[6] Bfm.ru, March 28, 2023.

[7] Kommersant.ru, April 3, 2023.

[8] Trtworld,com, August 18, 2017,

[9] Kommersant.ru, April 3, 2023.

[10] Kommersant.ru, April 2, 2023.

[11] Kommersant.ru, April 3, 2023.

[12] Kommersant.ru, April 3, 2023.

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 04/04/2023

                                        Tuesday, April 4, 2023
Radical Oppositionist Insulted, Threatened By Pro-Government Lawmakers
        • Gayane Saribekian
Armenia - Edgar Ghazarian (right) and pro-government deputy Artur Hovannisian 
attend a paliament committee meeting, April 4, 2023.
Pro-government lawmakers shouted verbal abuse and threats at an opposition 
candidate for the vacant post of Armenia’s human rights defender as he harshly 
criticized Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s government on Tuesday.
The two opposition groups represented in the Armenian parliament reluctantly 
nominated Edgar Ghazarian, a maverick activist, late last month despite lacking 
votes to install him as the country’s next ombudsman.
Ghazarian as well as the ruling Civil Contract party’s candidate, Deputy 
Prosecutor-General Anahit Manasian, appeared before the parliament committee on 
human rights ahead of the ombudsman’s election expected next week. Opposition 
parliamentarians were conspicuously absent from the meeting, underscoring their 
apparent reservations about their candidate and Manasian’s almost certain 
election.
The meeting descended into chaos after Ghazarian lashed out at the government in 
his opening remarks. He urged Armenians to oust a “criminal regime whose tenure 
has been marred by widespread human rights abuses.”
Artur Hovannisian, the number two figure in Civil Contract’s parliamentary 
group, interrupted the speech to protest against that characterization.
Ghazarian further infuriated Hovannisian and other pro-government deputies when 
he described the 2018 “velvet revolution,” which brought Pashinian to power, as 
the root cause of Armenia’s current problems.
“The obvious decline of all democratic institutions and human rights in our 
country is the result of the Turkish-Azerbaijani revolution that happened in 
Armenia in 2018,” declared the radical oppositionist.
“We will cut the tongues and ears of anyone who will dare to call our people an 
Azerbaijani-Turkish group,” shouted Hovannisian.
“By describing the events of 2018 as a Turkish-Azerbaijani revolution I don’t 
mean the behavior of the Armenian people. I mean the beneficiaries of those 
events,” clarified Ghazarian.
The Civil Contract deputies attending the meeting doubled down on insults, 
taunts and ridicule directed at him. One of them, Narek Ghahramanian, noted 
mockingly that Ghazarian was beaten up by unknown assailants outside his home 
last October.
“Nobody is going to beat you up here,” Hovannisian told the opposition 
candidate. “But don’t provoke us. Come on, get out of here!”
Ghazarian served as a provincial governor and Armenia’s ambassador to Poland 
during former President Serzh Sarkisian’s rule. He became the chief of the 
Armenian Constitutional Court staff after Sarkisian was toppled in the 2018 
“velvet revolution.” He lost that post in 2020.
Ghazarian, who is currently not affiliated with any party, set up a fringe 
opposition group last summer to campaign for Pashinian’s resignation and 
prosecution on treason charges. It rallied several hundred supporters in Yerevan 
in August.
Ter-Petrosian Demands ‘Notorious’ Parliament Speaker’s Ouster
        • Naira Bulghadarian
Armenia - Former President Levon Ter-Petrosian speaks at a press conference in 
Yerevan, June 10, 2021.
Former President Levon Ter-Petrosian on Tuesday condemned parliament speaker 
Alen Simonian in unusually strong terms for allegedly spitting at an opposition 
heckler and said he must be ousted.
A Canadian-Armenian member of the opposition Dashnaktsutyun party claimed that 
Simonian ordered his bodyguards to overpower him and then spat in his face after 
he branded the latter a “traitor” on a street in downtown Yerevan on Sunday. 
Simonian did not deny spitting at the activist, Garen Megerdichian. He said he 
was gravely insulted and responded accordingly.
Leaders of Armenia’s main opposition groups condemned Simonian’s actions as a 
“hooligan” act that warrants criminal proceedings.
Ter-Petrosian added his voice to the condemnation in an article posted on 
ilur.am. He blasted “the notorious Alen Simonian’s unforgivable deed” as a 
“national disgrace.”
“As for the word traitor, it is not a domestic curse or a personal insult but a 
purely political assessment which should be countered by a correct and 
reasonable response, rather than vulgar speech or saliva … There has never been 
a leader of a more or less democratic state in the world who was not branded a 
traitor by his political opponents,” he wrote.
“I am not exaggerating at all: his action is the biggest damage done to the 
reputation of our statehood which can be eliminated only by his removal from 
office,” Ter-Petrosian went on. “This is the only way to restore the honor of 
our people in the eyes of the international community.”
He said Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s party, which controls the National 
Assembly, should initiate Simonian’s ouster “in order not to finally ruin its 
standing with the people.”
Armenia - Parliament speaker Alen Simonian (right) meets Slovak lawmaker Marian 
Kery, Yerevan, April 4, 2023.
Lawmakers representing the party on Monday defended the speaker and blamed the 
opposition activist for Sunday’s incident.
Simonian, who is a senior member of the party and close Pashinian associate, was 
quick to hit back at the 78-year-old ex-president who had ruled Armenia from 
1991-1998. “I’m not a traitor, I never was and never will be,” he wrote on 
Facebook.
“The historian president should know well what the unforgivable mistakes are and 
the price paid by country leaders who committed unforgivable mistakes in 
history,” he said.
Simonian, 43, is no stranger to controversy. In particular, he angered the 
families of Armenian soldiers taken prisoner during the 2020 war with Azerbaijan 
with disparaging comments made about them in late 2021.
Last year, Simonian defended his mother after she was caught on camera spitting 
at opposition protesters and showing the middle finger to them from the balcony 
of her Yerevan apartment.
Pashinian’s Son Denies Assault Claims
Armenia - Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and his son Ashot, May 26, 2018.
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s son Ashot flatly denied on Tuesday claims by 
his father’s political allies that he was physically attacked in Yerevan at the 
weekend.
“There was no political or other attack against me,” he said in a statement. 
“Unfortunately, I have to personally refute the false information circulating 
about me.”
“As for the spread of the ‘information,’ I think the most surprising thing is 
who is quoting whom. I don’t even care why,” Ashot Pashinian added in what 
looked like a jibe at government loyalists who alleged the assault.
Parliament speaker Alen Simonian was the first to do that on Monday. Simonian 
said the “attack on the Armenian prime minister’s son” was part of “a series of 
provocations” organized by Armenian opposition groups.
One of those “provocations,” he said, was Sunday’s incident in downtown Yerevan 
during which Simonian allegedly spat at an opposition activist who branded him a 
traitor.
The embattled speaker refused to comment on Ashot Pashinian’s strong denial of 
his claim which was echoed by another senior pro-government lawmaker.
Unlike his mother and two of his sisters, the 22-year-old Pashinian Jr. has kept 
a low profile and not made political statements in recent years. Nor has he been 
seen accompanying his father on official or working trips abroad.
Yerevan To Have No Mayor Until End Of 2023
        • Narine Ghalechian
Armenia - Former Deputy Prime Minister Tigran Avinian attends a session of 
Yerevan's municipal assembly, September 23, 2022.
The post of Yerevan’s mayor will remain formally vacant until the next municipal 
elections slated for this fall, Armenia’s ruling Civil Contract party announced 
on Tuesday.
The tactical decision is clearly designed to boost the party’s and its mayoral 
candidate Tigran Avinian’s chances in the elections.
Yerevan’s last mayor, Hrachya Sargsian, stepped down on March 17 after only 15 
months in office. The Armenian capital has since been effectively run by 
Avinian, one of its deputy mayors.
Under Armenian law, the city council controlled by Civil Contract has to meet by 
April 11 to elect a new mayor. The council majority leader, Armen Galjian, said 
that he and the other pro-government members of the municipal assembly will 
boycott the vote and thus make it null and void.
“Our faction has decided not to elect a new mayor given that only a few months 
remain before the next elections,” said Galjian.
Isabella Abgarian, an independent member of the council, deplored the boycott. 
She said Armenia’s political leadership opted it for it simply because Avinian 
is not a council member and therefore not eligible for the post of mayor now.
“They can’t nominate someone else because that person could develop ambitions 
after becoming mayor, which would interfere with their plans,” Abgarian told 
RFE/RL’s Armenian Service.
Avinian will thus remain Yerevan’s de facto mayor and exploit his power of 
incumbency during the mayoral race, she said.
None of Armenia’s major opposition groups have fielded mayoral candidates so far.
The last municipal elections were held in September 2018. Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian’s won the overwhelming majority of seats in the city council and 
installed TV comedian Hayk Marutian as mayor. The council ousted Marutian in 
December 2021 after he fell out with Pashinian.
Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

Two new postage stamps dedicated to the theme “Armenia-Romania Joint Issue”

Save

Share

 11:14, 3 April 2023

YEREVAN, APRIL 3, ARMENPRESS. On April 3rd, 2023, two postage stamps dedicated to the theme “Armenia-Romania Joint Issue” were put into circulation.

Each postage stamp has a nominal value of 400 AMD. One of the stamps depicts the portrait of Ana Aslan, a famous Romanian doctor of Armenian origin, scientist, founder of the world’s first geriatrics institute, creator of the first anti-aging remedy “Gerovital”, and the other postage stamp depicts Ana Aslan’s photo and a branch with buds, symbolizing new life.

The postage stamps also depict the flags of Armenia and Romania, the signature of Ana Aslan as well as the inscriptions “ANA ASLAN”, “JOINT ISSUE ARMENIA-ROMANIA” and “1897-1988” in Armenian and English languages.

Date of issue: 

Designers: David Dovlatyan, MihailVămășescu

Printing house: Cartor, France

Size: 42,0 x 28,0mm

Stamps per sheet:10 pcs

Print run: 20 000 pcs x 2

 

 

All materials are provided by “Ana Aslan” Foundation ().



Armenia’s TUMO Center for Creative Technologies eyeing presence in PHL

The Philippines –

TUMO.ORG

Armenia-based free educational program TUMO Center for Creative Technologies said it is looking to expand into the Philippines.

“We are just at the start of discussion… to build those relationships and networks, to understand what the narrative is for the country, where the need is, and if we can, hopefully, find the right partners to launch our first center in Manila,” said Chris Shahinian, TUMO’s director of development. 

TUMO is a free educational program founded in 2011 that empowers teenagers to take charge of their learning. It recently developed a new approach to promoting learning among young people by using their interest in the digital world to make links to creativity, learning, and education.   

The program is built on a hyper-personalized approach to learning where students select the skills that most interest them and then create learning paths based on those skills.  

Students get a diploma by way of an online portfolio where all their work created during the program is displayed.  

This hyper-personalization, Mr. Shahinian said in a March 28 Zoom call, “allows each student or teenager to have a personal learning path that is adapted to their pace of development and interest over time.”  

Engagement is the underlying important factor that increases learning accuracies, he told BusinessWorld 

The program teaches students additional skills such as collaboration, problem-solving, and creative thinking, which are essential for success in the world.

“Kids hate to study but love to learn. Choice is super important. You need to give them enough choice for them to find their path and what they’re passionate about,” Mr. Shahiniam said.  

TUMO said it has expanded to four locations in Armenia and eight international locations, including Paris, Beirut, Moscow, Tirana, Berlin, Kyiv, and Lyon.   

There are also plans to open centers in Seoul, Tokyo, and Syndey.

TUMO’s story started off very Armenia-centric, Mr. Shahinian said. There is a need to create a program for Armenia’s youth “to make sure they have access to technical literacy and creative thinking outside of the traditional education system,” he said. As TUMO expanded globally, it found that this deficiency in Armenia was also present in many other parts of the world. 

“We aren’t saying that we can better the traditional educational system. We are complementary to it,” Mr. Shahinian said.

TUMO covers over 20 focus areas, including animation, computer programming, robotics, writing, and sustainable cities. — Patricia B. Mirasol