Turkey Denies Transit To Albanian Arms Shipment Bound For Armenia

TURKEY DENIES TRANSIT TO ALBANIAN ARMS SHIPMENT BOUND FOR ARMENIA
Report by Artur Korriku: "Berisha: Arms Trade With Armenia, Turkey Blocks Consignment" – subslug as received

Gazeta Shqiptare, Tirana
18 Jul 07

Turkish authorities have refused transit to a sizeable consignment
of Albanian weapons and ammunition bound for Armenia. They forced an
Albanian ship to sail back with its cargo. One of our naval vessels
loaded with containers full of weapons, mainly heavy artillery and
ammunition, was berthed at Durres port. The ship had sailed from Durres
to Istanbul, loaded with 60 containers of heavy artillery and shells,
destined for Armenia.

Sale

Several days earlier, a representative of the Armenian Defence
Ministry had contacted his counterpart at the Albanian Defence
Ministry and ordered a large consignment of field and anti-aircraft
artillery of various calibers, ranging from 75-mm to 122-mm together
with shells. The Albanian Defence Ministry had appointed the MEIKO
company to fill the order, since it had some experience in this
business. MEIKO has been known in the arms trade ever since Safet
Zhulali headed the Albanian Defence Ministry.

Blockage

MEIKO contacted the relevant officials in Armenia and clinched
the deal.

After everything seemed to be proceeding fine, a sudden obstacle
arose in Turkey, which did not allow the ship to sail through the
Straits and turned it back. Subsequently, the arms were unloaded in
the stores of the Albanian Army. The official reason that Turkey has
given for refusing transit to our ship is still unknown, as is the
price that Armenia was to pay for the shipment.

Armenia

Armenia, formerly part of the Soviet Union, is interested in the arms
being offered by this country, as they are the same as those at the
disposal of the other east European countries in terms of calibers. The
Armenian Army is in need for more artillery ammunition, as its supplies
have been interrupted because of political developments. However,
the transaction fell through because Turkey did not allow our ship
loaded with arms to sail through the Straits.

Turkey’s Multimillion Dollar Antigenocide Attack

AZG Armenian Daily #137, 21/07/2007

Genocide Recognition

TURKEY’S MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR ANTI-GENOCIDE ATTACK

Turkey’s multi-million dollar lobbyist Bob Livingston posted
an eight minute video on the Capitol Hill Broadcasting Network
website. Livingston’s anti-genocide diatribe is an effort to block
Congressional adoption of the Armenian Genocide Resolution (H.Res.106 /
S.Res.106), according to the Armenian National Committee of America.

In response to the Livingston attack, Armenian Genocide Resolution
lead advocates, Representatives Adam Schiff (D-CA), George Radanovich
(R-CA), Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Joe Knollenberg (R-MI) cosigned a
July 18th letter to Congressional colleagues discrediting Livingston’s
denialist claims. The Congressional letter noted that: "For the past
seven years Mr. Livingston has been a paid lobbyist for Turkey, which
has spent millions of dollars denying what the world knows to be true –
that in the first decades of the last century a horrible genocide was
committed against the Armenian people. The factual evidence supporting
the Armenian Genocide is vast, and no effort to deny these facts –
no matter the source of the denial – will ever change history."

The letter went on to urge House members to join over 220 of their
colleagues in cosponsoring H.Res.106.

Earlier this week, The New Republic, a major national magazine, ran a
feature-length, stinging expose on the efforts of Turkish government
lobbyists to defeat the Armenian Genocide Resolution. The article,
written by Michael Crowley, provides a behind the scenes glimpse
into the multi-million dollar genocide denial industry, spotlighting
former House Minority leader Dick Gephardt and Bob Livingston as the
lead beneficiaries of Turkey’s anti-genocide campaign.

BAKU: Expert praises Azeri-NATO cooperation

Expert praises Azeri-NATO cooperation

Day.az website, Baku
12 Jul 07

A political expert with the Baku-based Institute for Peace and Democracy has
praised Azerbaijan’s cooperation with NATO. He believes Azerbaijan has done
more than Georgia to this effect. Commenting on the Russian proposal to the
USA on joint use of the Qabala radar facility, Yunus said he is confident
that the USA will not agree to the proposal. In an interview with Day.az
website, the expert also played down statements that the Azerbaijani-Russian
relations were of strategic nature. He thinks that "the Azerbaijani-Russian
relations can be considered as cooperation based on suspicion and distrust".
The following is an excerpt of his interview with Day.az entitled: "Arif
Yunus: The Azerbaijani-Russian relations can be considered as cooperation
based on suspicion and distrust", published on the Day.az website on 12
July; subheadings have been inserted editorially:

A Day.az interview with prominent Azerbaijani political expert Arif Yunus.

Diplomatic rhetoric

[Correspondent] The joint exploitation of the Qabala radar station is the
most discussed topic worldwide now. Do you think the USA will agree to the
joint use of this facility?

[Yunus] I do not even think of this. And I am more than convinced that
Americans will not agree to this proposal.

[Passage omitted: reference to statements by top US officials]

[Correspondent] Nevertheless, in an interview with Azerbaijani reporters,
[Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs and US Minsk
Group co-chair] Matthew Bryza all the same did not rule out discussing the
Qabala radar station. How would you interpret his statements?

[Yunus] Over the recent years Matthew Bryza has said so many interesting
things both on the Karabakh settlement and on other issues that seems he
himself became entangled in his statements. For this reason, I treat his
statements carefully as what he speaks about takes place rarely.

[Correspondent] After all he is an official person and expresses position of
his state.

[Yunus] Statements of officials should often be assessed as diplomatic
rhetoric. For example, our authorities have more than once stated that they
would go to war against Armenia but this does not happen for some reason.
Therefore, two things should be separated. First, they are statements which
are calculated on the diplomatic rhetoric, second it is when statements are
backed by specific actions. In this instance, I do not see concrete actions
after Matthew Bryza’s statements. Simply, he has been assigned this task and
he is performing it.

Azeri-Russian relations based on suspicion and distrust

[Correspondent] Let us talk about the Azerbaijani-Russian relations. What is
your assessment of them?

[Yunus] On this occasion, we again witness to the diplomatic rhetoric. On
the one hand, our government maintains that strategic relations have been
established between Russia and Azerbaijan; on the other hand, they have not
been backed by any specific actions. That is to say, the Azerbaijani-Russian
relations can be considered as cooperation based on suspicion and distrust.
All started when Russia proposed gas to Azerbaijan at higher prices and
toughened migration rules. After all, it is an open secret that the new
migration rules were directed first of all against Azerbaijanis. There is
every reason to believe in this as the Russian authorities first started to
apply the new rules for migrants working at the markets. Where do
Azerbaijanis work most of all in Russia? At markets. Now draw a conclusion
as to who the new migration rules were against.

The time has come for Azerbaijan now to respond to Russia. From this follows
the closure of Russian TV channels and a proposal to purchase Azerbaijani
gas at outrageous prices. After all these, it is at least ingenuous to speak
about the strategic partnership between the two states.

Baku outpace Tbilisi in cooperation with NATO

[Correspondent] If that’s the case, why does Azerbaijan fear to firmly
declare about joining NATO?

[Yunus] Azerbaijan is not taking this step for some reasons. Except for
Russia, Azerbaijan has another neighbour – Iran. And Baku, knowing
beforehand that such a step would cause discontent both in Moscow and
Tehran, so far avoids taking concrete steps in this direction. Joining NATO
is a serious action and at this point, both Russia and Iran would respond
without fail. Although unlike Georgia which speaks a lot and thus irritates
Moscow, Azerbaijan is doing more in this direction. Let us see, the USA has
not installed its radars in Georgia but did it in Azerbaijan. That is to
say, Azerbaijan, as the saying goes, without any fanfares, is moving in this
direction quietly and tacitly.

[Correspondent] The Karabakh separatist regime is again making preparations
for the presidential election [on 19 July]. We would like to know what the
separatists count on knowing beforehand that the election will not be
recognized by anyone in the world?

[Yunus] This is simply the next phase in the attempts of the self-styled
Nagornyy Karabakh authorities to legalize their power. It mainly bears a
propaganda nature in order to again claim that the election is a
manifestation of democracy and expression of the will of the people.
Actually, a handful of people want to take advantage of this election in
order to realize their ambitious aims for all that understanding well that
no-one will recognize them in the world. Therefore, I consider that it is
not worth paying serious attention to the election.

Karabakh visit of Azeri intellectuals hailed

[Correspondent] What is your reaction to the visit of the intelligentsia
representatives to Nagornyy Karabakh?

[Yunus] If you want to learn my opinion, I am positive about the visit.
However, judging by the reaction of the Azerbaijani public, the visit was
apprehended ambiguously. Consequently, I think such visits will continue.
The policy of people’s diplomacy contemplates openness but this visit was
covered with mystery. The whole atmosphere of the visit was so much
contradictory that it was doomed to failure from the outset. Moreover, it
took place against the backdrop of the president’s belligerent statements.
Therefore, there cropped up many questions regarding the visit. The whole
trouble of our society is that we have not yet determined our position in
the Karabakh issue. Whether we want to go to war or want peace. However,
judging by the mood, our society want neither war no peace. That is to say,
it has not yet decided on this issue. Therefore, with this uncertainty it
would be hard to find an option for the resolution of the Karabakh conflict.

[Correspondent] But both in the West and in Russia, they consider that the
sole option for the resolution of this problem is peace talks. And sometimes
some diplomats point to the example of Russia and Germany that they managed
to reach an agreement after the WWII which claimed millions of lives. Do you
share this opinion?

[Yunus] Of course not as the Karabakh conflict differs cardinally from many
other conflicts. If Russia and Germany were involved in a global conflict
such as the Second World War was, then in our case, we and Armenia are
involved in a local conflict. Such conflicts are many worldwide. Take the
problems of Cyprus, the Middle East, the Kashmir which last for years and
the Karabakh conflict is from the same series. Therefore, it requires time
and generations that will be tied of conflicts.

The Russians did not also become reconciled with Germans immediately. This
happened after many years, after several generations were replaced. Even now
one can meet people treating one another with enmity both in Russia and
Germany. And so I am not a supporter of such comparisons. I think that we
and Armenians can find a common language easier than Russians and Germans.

Nevertheless, the reconciliation is not the key point; the main point is to
find a political solution to the conflict. In order this conflict be
resolved; first of all, the peoples of the conflicting parties should
recognize that the current situation has reached an impasse. After all, in
fact, the problem is that the sides do not trust each other. None of the
sides want to yield to one another. The Armenians should finally understand
that the occupation of other’s territory in the current civilized world is
unacceptable. And we should understand that if we consider Karabakh our land
and those living there our citizens, then we should stop threatening and
frightening them. We shall break an impasse quickly if the sides find
strength to back down from their positions.

Armenian Leader Reshuffles Top Brass

ARMENIAN LEADER RESHUFFLES TOP BRASS

Mediamax news agency
20 Jul 07

Yerevan, 20 July: Armenian President Robert Kocharyan signed decrees
today [20 July], shuffling several high-ranking military officials
in the armed forces.

The presidential service reported that Maj-Gen Artush Harutyunyan was
relieved of his post of the military commissar of Armenia. Maj-Gen
Kamo Kochunts, the former deputy head of the General Staff and the
head of the General Staff operations department, was appointed the
new military commissar. A 5-year contract will be signed with Kochunts.

Col Artak Davtyan has been appointed deputy head of the General Staff
and the head of the General Staff operations department. A 5-year
contract will be signed with him.

Lt-Gen Stepan Mirzoyan has been released from the post of the Defence
Ministry’s Vazgen Sargsyan Military Institute to be replaced by
Maj-Gen Garegin Gabrielyan, who is the former commander of the First
Army Corps of the Armenian Armed Forces.

Col Poghos Poghosyan has been appointed the commander of the First
Army Corps of the Armenian Armed Forces.

Col Andranik Makaryan has been appointed the commander of the Fifth
Army Corps of the Armenian Armed Forces; a 5-year contract has been
signed with him.

The former commander of the Fifth Army Corps, Maj-Gen Valeri Grigoryan,
has been appointed the commander of the Fourth Army Corps with a
5-year contract.

Nagorno- Karabakh Elects Separatist Head

NAGORNO- KARABAKH ELECTS SEPARATIST HEAD

Focus News, Bulgaria
July 20 2007

N Karabakh. The breakaway ethnic Armenian enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh
has elected a separatist former security chief as president, election
officials say, cited by BBC.

Bako Sahakyan secured 85% of the vote in a landslide victory. Nagorno
Karabakh is part of Azerbaijan, which has dismissed the vote.

Thousands died when Azerbaijan and Armenia fought over the area in
the 1990s.

Mr Sahakyan has said he wants the poll to help Nagorno-Karabakh secure
broader approval for its claim to independence. No country currently
recognises the enclave’s claim.

Karabakh Elections A Positive Step In Settlement Process – President

KARABAKH ELECTIONS A POSITIVE STEP IN SETTLEMENT PROCESS – PRESIDENT

Interfax, Russia
July 20 2007

STEPANAKERT. July 19 (Interfax) – Nagorno-Karabakh’s presidential
elections will have a positive effect on the Karabakh settlement
process, Nagorno-Karabakh President Arkady Gukasian said.

"Otherwise, negotiations will make no sense," Gukasian said.

Nagorno-Karabakh will inevitably become a negotiating party along
with Armenia and Azerbaijan, he said.

Asked to comment on negative responses to the Karabakh elections
from a number of international institutions, Gukasian said, "We are
holding elections not to please the international community, but
to attain our own goals. Those who are against electing the head of
Nagorno-Karabakh are welcome to offer an alternative."

The elections will be valid if at least 25% of the eligible voters
case their ballots.

Turkey: Religious Minorities Watch Closely As Election Day Approache

TURKEY: RELIGIOUS MINORITIES WATCH CLOSELY AS ELECTION DAY APPROACHES
Yigal Schleifer

EurasiaNet, NY
July 19 2007

The Princes’ Islands, a small archipelago about an hour’s ferry ride
from Istanbul, are perhaps the last remnant of the city’s cosmopolitan
past. The summer home of a large part of Istanbul’s Armenian, Greek
and Jewish communities, the islands are one of the few places in
Turkey where you can still hear Ladino and Greek spoken on the street.

Kinali, one of the smaller islands, is a favorite among Istanbul’s
Armenians. Along its leafy main street, markets sell Armenian
delicacies, while down on the rocky beach, men and women of all ages
sun themselves while looking out upon the Istanbul skyline.

Despite the island’s tranquility, the vacationers’ minds are not at
ease. Turkey will hold parliamentary elections on July 22, and many
members of Turkey’s small, but historic religious minorities believe
these elections are the most important in decades.

On the one hand, Turkey’s successful government, led by the
liberal-Islamic Justice and Development Party (AKP), has been accused
of trying to undermine the country’s secular foundations and to
promote the role of Islam in public life. On the other hand, the
country’s secular opposition has increasingly embraced rhetoric that
is nationalist and anti-Western, part of a wider nationalist surge
that has already turned violent. Last January, an ultra-nationalist
teenager shot to death Hrant Dink, an outspoken Armenian journalist, on
an Istanbul sidewalk. [For background see the Eurasia insight archive].

nsight/articles/eav012207.shtml
A few months later, a group of young men brutally murdered three
evangelical Christians in the Turkish city of Malatya. [For background
see the Eurasia Insight archive].

nsight/articles/eav042507.shtml

While in previous votes people sometimes didn’t bother to leave
the beach to go cast their votes on the mainland, islanders say this
election is different. "This time, people are aware of the seriousness
of these elections. As minorities, these elections are very important
for us," says Nadin Papuccian, a 22-year-old Armenian sitting with
friends at a waterside cafe.

Though small, numbering less than 100,000 in a country of 70 million,
Turkey’s officially recognized minorities – Armenians, Greeks and
Jews – loom large in the country’s imagination, and in how Turkey is
perceived abroad.

Ankara often uses the minorities’ continued presence to present Turkey
as a mosaic where different religious groups coexist peacefully. At
the same time, religious freedom is consistently one of the barometers
by which Turkey’s progress on human rights issues and its ongoing
European Union membership bid are measured. Also, problems revolving
around the minorities – from the Armenian genocide debate to the
Cyprus issue and the continuing closure of a major Orthodox Christian
seminary on Heybeli, another of the Princes’ Islands – continue to
haunt Turkey domestically and in foreign affairs. [For background
see the Eurasia Insight archive].

nsight/articles/eav110806b.shtml

The July 22 election comes in the midst of a raging debate over the
role of Islam in public life and the question of whether the AKP
is committed to maintaining Turkey’s secular system. Despite that,
it appears that a large number of Turkey’s Christians are supporting
the party, which has worked hard to portray itself as committed to
democratization and human rights.

"The AK Party is more moderate and less nationalistic in its dealings
with minorities. The Erdogan government listens to us – we will vote
for the AK Party in the next elections," Mesrob II, the Armenian
patriarch in Turkey, told the German magazine Der Spiegel in a recent
interview.

Meanwhile, Agos, the Armenian weekly, estimates close to 60 percent
of Turkey’s 70,000 Armenians will vote for the AKP. "I’m a Christian,
but I’m not scared of the AKP. They are working for the good of the
country, they are respecting other cultures and accepting the rules of
the EU," says Aret Cavdar, an Istanbul steel trader who is summering
in Kinali. "I don’t know if they are honest about this or not, but
I haven’t seen another government working this well."

Mihail Vasiliadis, editor of Apoyevmatini, a Greek-language daily
newspaper based in Istanbul, says he believes Turkey’s miniscule Greek
community – an estimated 2,000 people remaining from a population
that numbered over a million in the early 1920’s – is also backing
the AKP. "[AKP leaders] are more liberal towards the minorities. I
do not deny that they are Islamists, but they are the only [ones]
that will guarantee Turkey’s integration with Europe," he says.

Vasiliadis points out to a debate last year in parliament over
reform-minded legislation introduced by the AKP that would have
liberalized the strict rules governing minority-run foundations
and would have created a mechanism for returning minority property
confiscated by the state. The bill was strongly opposed by MPs from the
secularist Republican People’s Party (CHP), Turkey’s main opposition
party. Opponents claimed the bill would give foreign powers more
control in the country. "When you look at the other [Turkish political]
parties, they consider minorities as part of another nation. They
see us as a cancer within the nationalist structure," Vasiliadis says.

In contrast, members of Turkey’s 20,000-member Jewish community appear
to be leaning towards the CHP, currently the only viable secular
opposition to the AKP, despite the fact that the party has grown
increasingly hostile to the United States and the EU over the last
several years and has a poor track record when it comes to minority
rights. The party has also hinted that it might form a coalition with
far-right Nationalist Action Party (MHP), whose stance on minority
issues is even worse.

Still, for many Jews, Islamism in Turkey has been synonymous with
anti-Semitism, and concerns about the AKP’s Islamic roots and agenda
have not been allayed. Nisim Cohen, a textile merchant eating at a
kosher restaurant on Buyukada, the largest of the Princes’ Islands,
says he will vote for the CHP, though he’s not happy about it. "I
don’t like [the CHP], but I don’t have a choice," Cohen says. "The
AKP shows a nice face, but in their hearts I fear they want to make
this an Islamic country. They will not keep the Republic as it is."

Adds Viktor Kuzu, an advertising executive who is also a former
columnist for Salom, the Jewish community’s weekly newspaper: "The
last year put questions in our mind. If [the AKP] could have the power
to change the educational system, the court system and the interrupt
the way we live, then that is not a good option."

"So let’s have an AKP government that is still in charge, but has
less power. Hopefully that will be the scenario," Kuzu suggested.

Members of Turkey’s religious minorities are keenly aware of the
reality that they are effectively, though not legally, excluded from
top positions in public service, politics and the military. No party,
for example, is running with any high-profile Christian or Jewish
candidates. "In this country, Turk means Muslim Turk," Baskin Oran,
an Ankara University professor who is running as an independent
candidate for parliament in Istanbul, and who is also expected to
get strong support from Armenian voters, told the English-language
newspaper Today’s Zaman.

Rifat Bali, an Istanbul-based independent researcher and historian
who has written extensively on Turkey’s minorities, says despite some
improvement, the AKP’s track record on minority rights is spotty. "I
don’t think they tried to change the atmosphere regarding minorities,"
he says. "Take the Malatya murders or the Dink murder: besides paying
lip service, nothing was done. There was no strong statement issued."

Critics have pointed out that Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Turkey’s prime
minister and leader of the AKP, continues to host on his private
airplane writers from Vakit, an Islamist newspaper that publishes
rabidly anti-Semitic articles. And when the mainstream media recently
raised hackles after it turned out that one of the foreign investors
in a consortium that bought Turkey’s state-owned chemical company
was of Armenian descent, the government quickly stated that it would
review the sale.

Bali suggested that there was a superficial quality to Turkey’s
EU-mandated efforts to democratize society as part of the accession
process, asserting that the AKP has taken no action to curb both
Islamist and ultra-nationalist media outlets from promoting racist and
anti-Semitic views. "It goes on as before, with no one interfering,"
Bali said.

Editor’s Note: Yigal Schleifer is a freelance journalist based in
Istanbul.

http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/i
http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/i
http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/i

Armenian President Charged Nature Protection Minister To Create Lega

ARMENIAN PRESIDENT CHARGED NATURE PROTECTION MINISTER TO CREATE LEGAL BASE FOR EXPLOITATION OF SUBSURFACE RESOURCES WITHOUT DAMAGING THE ENVIRONMENT

arminfo
2007-07-16 21:32:00

Armenian President Robert Kocharyan charged the newly appointed
Nature Protection Minister Aram Harutyunyan to create legal base
for exploitation of subsurface resources without damaging the
environment. As Arminfo was informed from press-service of the
president, over today’s meeting with Harutyunyan the president drew
special attention on the necessity of legislative reforms making
observing international norms on subsoil use, which will make
developing of the country’s economy possible, but at the same time
all the nature protection measures will be observed. They also touched
on the management problem of "Sevan" and "Dilijan" national parks.

The president charged on this problem as well as on the current and
future programmes of the ministry.

Sitting Of Armenian-Iranian Intergovernmental Commission To Be Held

SITTING OF ARMENIAN-IRANIAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMISSION TO BE HELD ON JULY 20 IN YEREVAN

Noyan Tapan
Jul 17 2007

YEREVAN, JULY 17, NOYAN TAPAN. The 7th sitting of Armenian-Iranian
Intergovernmental Commission will be held on July 20 in
Yerevan. Manouchehr Mottaki, the Foreign Minister of Iran, the
Commission’s Iranian Co-chairman, will arrive in Armenia for taking
part in it. Issues regarding free trade, as well as other issues
related to bilateral economic relations are on the sitting’s agenda. A
Memorandum on Mutual Understanding will be signed at the end of the
sitting. Seyid Mahdi Mirabutalebi, the Head of the Economic Cooperation
General Department of the IRI Foreign Ministry, at the July 17 meeting,
explained that the Iranian party has assumed chairmanship in the
Intergovernmental Commission at the Foreign Ministry’s level, as they
are not content with the level of the current economic relations.

S. M. Mirabutalebi said that though the political dialogue between
the two countries is at the high level, nevertheless, serious steps
should be also undertaken in the direction of developing economic
cooperation, in particular, bringing commodity circulation between
the two countries to 1b USD this year.

Armen Bayburdian, the RA Deputy Foreign Minister, said that five
working groups have been created, which are engaged in issued related
to the primary spheres of trade and economic relations.

Extremely Interesting Facts From The Lives Of The "Political Prisone

EXTREMELY INTERESTING FACTS FROM THE LIVES OF THE "POLITICAL PRISONERS". NEW REVELATIONS EXPECTED

Hayots Ashkharh
17 july 07

As we know, between April 24 to April 26, 2007 Vahan Shirkhanyan
and Alexander Arzumanyan met Levon Grigor Markos (the latter being
under investigation), in Moscow and reached certain agreements. As
a consequence, in April 27 and 28, in the names of 9 henchmen they
received 19.800 dollars (by the name of each of the before mentioned
9 henchman), from Moscow, through "Converse Bank" CJSC (total 178200
dollars). Alexander Arzumanyan has been charged with Article 190,
section 3, point 1 of the Criminal Code and has been in detention
from May 10 2007.

On May 24, 2007 RA General Prosecutor’s Office applied to that of
the Russian Federation to show legal assistance, to hold different
investigation activities, interrogations and seizure of certain bank
documents in the territory of the Russian Federation and has sent
two representatives responsible for the proceeding, to Moscow.

Thus, according to Russian "Regnium" agency, the inspectors have
brought extremely interesting and large-scale information that can
create serious problems for Vahan Shirkhanyan as well. Particularly,
the inspectors send on mission to Moscow, found out that the 9 henchmen
whose names have been used for money transfer are quite unaware of
it. That is to say without their knowledge these people used their
data to send money from Moscow.

In Moscow Sashik Aghazaryan, who has undertaken the responsibility
of transferring the money, came out as a witness. He stated that he
has allocated the money at Alexander Arzumanyan’s request for the
latter to cover certain every-day problems and not for the wedding
party of Vahan Shirkhanyan’s daughter. He said he doesn’t know Vahan
Shirkhanyan personally.

The mechanisms, Sashik Aghazaryan used to transfer the money was also
quite interesting. In the near future another group of investigators
will live fore Moscow. According to "Regnium" the money has been
transferred from Moscow with serious breaches, which can create
problems for the employees of "Trade Financial Bank" CJSC, including
Armenians.

Hopefully these days we will be able to introduce other extremely
interesting facts about the activities of the funding of Armenian
"political prisoners".