BAKU: `Armenia stands poor chance at deceiving fact-finding mission’

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Jan 28 2005
`Armenia stands poor chance at deceiving fact-finding mission’

BAKU
The OSCE fact-finding mission will stay in the occupied Azerbaijani
territories for ten days at the most, Deputy Foreign Minister,
President’s special envoy on the Upper Garabagh conflict, Araz
Azimov, told a news conference on Friday.
The mission will start its work in the Kalbajar district and proceed
according to a map it will receive, containing all the data related
to the territories settled by Armenians.
Azimov said that there are no reasons for concerns over possible
attempts by Armenians to hide the territories that Azerbaijan
considers important and that they stand a poor chance at deceiving
the mission. He said that the mission representatives will be
responsible for visiting those areas and expressed confidence that
they will properly fulfill their duties.
Azimov said that upon conclusion of the visit, the OSCE mission will
compare the data it collects with the materials presented by
Azerbaijan and prepare a relevant report. The document based on these
facts, after being considered by the OSCE Minsk Group, will be
further submitted to the OSCE Permanent Council in Vienna.*
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: Azeri speaker calls for more active OSCE role in NK settlement

Azeri speaker calls for more active OSCE role in Karabakh settlement
Trend news agency
21 Jan 05
BAKU
Azerbaijan stands for a solution to the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict on
the basis of the principle of the territorial integrity of states and
the norms of international law, Azerbaijan Speaker Murtuz Alasgarov
has said at a meeting with the special envoy of the OSCE
chairman-in-office, Andrzej Kasprzyk.
Negotiations are under way for the solution of the problem at the
level of international organizations, foreign ministers and
parliaments, he said.
“The Council of Europe has expressed its attitude to the issue several
times and a report on Nagornyy Karabakh will be heard at the winter
session [of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe] on 25
January. The OSCE Minsk Group has been dealing with the settlement of
the conflict for more than 10 years. But, unfortunately, despite the
lengthy period of time, positive results have not been achieved
yet. We think that the OSCE should increase its activity and enhance
its role,” the speaker stressed.
Confirming that the negotiations have not yielded any fruits yet,
Kasprzyk said one can think after the last meeting of the [Azerbaijani
and Armenian] foreign ministers [in Prague] that there will be
success. I believe that the parliaments should also increase their
activities in the issue and the negotiations should be continued, he
added.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: `Neftchi’ beats Armenian champion

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Jan 20 2005
`Neftchi’ beats Armenian champion

Azerbaijan’s last champion, Neftchi football club sealed a 2:0 win
over Armenian champion Punik in the ¼ finals of the Commonwealth Cup
tournament on Wednesday. The goals were scored by Georgian
legionnaire Georgi Adamiya and Vidadi Rzayev in the second halftime.
The Azeri team will face Ukraine’s `Dinamo Kiev’ in the semifinals.
Earlier `Neftchi’ had 1:0 and 4:1 wins over Moldova’s Sherif and
Turkmenistan’s Nebitchi respectively in the group.*
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

INTEL to Give Lectures in 3 Yerevan Higher Ed Institutions in 2005

INTEL SPECIALISTS TO GIVE LECTURES IN THREE YEREVAN HIGHER EDUCATIONAL
INSTITUTIONS IN 2005
YEREVAN, January 5 (Noyan Tapan). During 2005, the Armenian Unicomp
company will organize “computer days” at Yerevan State University,
Yerevan Polytechnic University and the Armenian-Russian (Slavonic)
University. According to Armen Baldrian, director general of the
company, during “computer days” young specialists of the American
Intel Technologies corporation will deliver lectures, and students
will be shown technical and technological novelties. According to
A. Baldrian, the sphere of information technologies is rapidly
developing in Armenia, and students take great interest in such
programs. He expressed hope that the courses to be organized will be
efficient and useful for future specialists.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Orange Revolution eyes Belarus

The Globe and Mail, Canada
Dec 29 2004
Orange Revolution eyes Belarus

Activist recruiting Yushchenko backers to help in campaign against
President
By MARK MacKINNON

KIEV — Ukraine’s Orange Revolution is not over yet, but Denis
Buinitsky already is recruiting for what he hopes will be Eastern
Europe’s next popular uprising.
“Who’s coming to the revolution in Belarus?” the activist shouted,
waving his arms to draw a crowd to a list he had mounted last night
in the tent city that still blocks traffic on Kiev’s Khreshchatyk
Street.
Within minutes, a short line of orange-clad students forms to write
their names, addresses and cellphone numbers in red ink on the long,
white piece of paper. They are the young foot soldiers of the
movement that brought Ukraine’s pro-Western opposition leader, Viktor
Yushchenko, to the brink of the presidency.
And like modern-day Che Guevaras, they say they are ready to march on
to the next revolution as soon as their cellphones ring to tell them
where it is.
Four years ago, it happened in Serbia, where student-led street
protests brought down Slobodan Milosevic. Last year, it was the Rose
Revolution in Georgia, when Eduard Shevardnadze was forced from power
after a rigged election.
Then came the recent weeks of protests in Kiev, triggered by a
falsified presidential vote on Nov. 21, that forced the regime of
President Leonid Kuchma and his clique to the brink.
Ukraine’s Central Election Commission said yesterday that with all
votes from Sunday’s election rerun counted, Mr. Yushchenko has 52 per
cent of the vote to 44 per cent for Mr. Kuchma’s hand-picked
successor, Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovich.
The results are not official until all complaints of fraud are
studied, a process expected to last into the new year.
Mr. Yanukovich, citing alleged irregularities, has said he will
challenge the vote count in court. However, the Council of Europe,
pointing to reports from international observers who say the election
was relatively free and fair, called yesterday for him to concede
defeat.
Although critics, notably in the Kremlin, argue that all three
uprisings were designed and paid for by Washington, there is no
question they had massive support among people who longed for
something better.
Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili, the young reformer who led
the demonstrations in Tbilisi last year and succeeded Mr.
Shevardnadze as President, said that what happened in Serbia, Georgia
and Ukraine is the leading edge of a third wave of European
liberation — the first being after the defeat of Nazi Germany in the
Second World War, the second after the fall of the Berlin Wall.
Mr. Buinitsky hopes the wave will next hit his native Belarus, a
country of 10 million in the centre of Europe that has been ruled for
a decade by the dictatorial President Alexander Lukashenko.
During those 10 years, the country lapsed into economic backwardness
and become an international pariah for its poor human-rights record.
“People in Kiev have freedom now; this isn’t the case in Minsk.
Lukashenko has made it impossible to hold such a demonstration there
because people know if they go into the streets they will go to
prison. But maybe it will be possible some day soon,” Mr. Buinitsky
said, standing outside a tent erected in the centre of Kiev for
Belarussian activists. “This has given us hope.”
It’s not just Belarussians who suddenly talk of peaceful revolution.
Activists from pro-democracy movements across the former Soviet Union
joined the protests in Kiev, anxious to show their support and,
perhaps, learn a few tricks.
The flags of Russia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Armenia were flown
above the orange-clad crowd on Independence Square. Boris Nemtsov, a
co-leader of the liberal Union of Right Forces party in Russia, said
from the stage in the early days after the Nov. 21 vote: “We need to
have freedom and democracy in Ukraine so that we can have freedom and
democracy in Russia.”
Moscow-based political analysts said the regimes in Russia and other
former Soviet states can be expected to tighten, rather than loosen,
the controls, in an effort to prevent the Georgian and Ukrainian
examples from being repeated in their backyards.
The authorities in faraway Kyrgyzstan, part of which was Soviet
Central Asia, are nervous and warn that their country is facing an
“orange danger” ahead of a parliamentary election in February.
Belarus’s opposition is calling on its supporters to gather on March
25 in Minsk’s central October Square to demand that Mr. Lukashenko
step down.
If he rejects this ultimatum, organizers said, they will prepare for
their own Orange Revolution around the presidential vote scheduled
for the same date in 2006.
“If there will be too few of us, the regime won’t hesitate,” reads a
leaflet delivered to 500,000 homes in Minsk this month.
“If tens of thousands go onto the streets, as in Kiev, it will not
dare to shoot at people.”
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

The Letter Of Kazimirov

THE LETTER OF KAZIMIROV
Azat Artsakh – Nagorno Karabakh Republic (NKR)
23 Dec 04
In 1992-96 the personal representative of the Russian president on
Karabakh issue Vladimir Kazimirov sent a letter to the PACE reporter on
the Karabakh issue David Atkinson and expressed his indignation with
the emphasized pro-Azerbaijani nature of the report. Particularly,
according to Kazimirov, in Atkinsonâ~@~Y s report, the achievement of
the ceasefire on May 12, 1994 is ascribed to the OSCE Minsk Group and
the personal representative of the OSCE chairman-in-office, whereas
the ceasefire in Karabakh was maintained owing to the Russiaâ~@~Ys
mediation, and the Minsk Group was founded in December 1994, and
the post of personal representative was created years after the
ceasefire. â~@~The most important international documents on Karabakh
resolution were prepared on a balanced basis in order to facilitate
making compromises for the parties. None of these were so much biased
towards Azerbaijan as your project,â~@~] writes Kazimirov. The former
mediator in the Karabakh issue, who is well acquainted with the
Karabakh conflict detail by detail and during his office visited the
region 47 times, reminds Atkinson that in his and Davisâ~@~Ys reports
the prehistory of the conflict, the military actions in 1992-94, the
process of resolution were paid little attention. â~@~Many problems
connected with the Karabakh conflict occurred by the fault of the
conflict parties, whereas in your project only the Armenian side
was blamed. I do not want to justify the Armenians at all but it is
necessary to give an unbiased assessment of all the parties. Moreover,
it was Azerbaijan to support the settlement of the conflict by
force and to refuse the steps directed at easing tensions,â~@~]
he writes. Kazimirov emphasizes that in the UN resolutions and OSCE
documents Nagorni Karabakh is recognized as a conflict party. â~@~Only
in your resolutions is this problem evaded, Armenia and Azerbaijan are
recognized as conflict parties which favours Bakuâ~@~Ys interests.â~@~]
He also reminds that in the OSCE summit in Budapest three conflict
parties are clearly mentioned. â~@~The conflict party is Azerbaijan
and not the Azerbaijani community of Nagorni Karabakh. There are
no differences in the positions of Azerbaijan and the Azerbaijani
community of Karabakh,â~@~] mentions Kazimirov and blames Atkinson for
stressing the importance of the Azerbaijani community of Karabakh in
the report. â~@~Is it possible to say â~@~the British community of
Londonâ~@~], â~@~the Azerbaijani community of Bakuâ~@~], â~@~the
Russian community of Moscowâ~@~]?â~@~] Kazimirov is surprised that
the Davis-Atkinson report makes reference to the four resolutions
of the OSCE Council for Security but only the demand of withdrawal
of Armenian forces is stressed. â~@~Before May 1994, that is for
more than a year (after the first resolution of the UN Council for
Security â~@~S ed.), the Azerbaijani authorities who neglected the
main requirements of the four resolutions and betted on the settlement
of the conflict through force, have broken the ceasefire for a number
of times. Azerbaijan accepted the ceasefire not because it honoured
the resolutions of the UN Council for Security but because of their
utter defeat in the war and the threat of losing power. The problems
of Armenians were also enough but Armenians were more flexible and
constructive,â~@~] notices Kazimirov and adds, â~@~For the occupation
of territories and the growth of the number of refugees not only
Armenia and Nagorni Karabakh but also Azerbaijan is to blame.â~@~]
The former Russian diplomat admits that Armenians do not withdraw
their forces and insist on the package resolution. But â~@~in fact,
the Azerbaijani government did not honour any requirement of the four
resolutions of the UN Council for Security.â~@~] â~@~And it does not
honour presently either. Moreover, it demands that Turkey maintain
the blockade of Armenia, regularly threatens to settle the conflict
through force, encourages the anti-Armenian hysteria in Azerbaijan
but there is not a word on this (in the Atkinsonâ~@~Ys report â~@~S
ed.).â~@~] In the end Kazimirov reminds that Armenians control 5
regions completely and 2 partially and not 8 regions as Atkinson
mentions. The former Russian diplomat mentions that Azerbaijan has
also occupied Armenian territories, such as Artsvashen. At the end of
the letter Kazimirov states that such an authoritative organization
as the PACE might have a balanced approach to the Karabakh conflict.
AA. 23-12-2004
–Boundary_(ID_zjnqydXgIorYwwpb46yzIQ)–
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Will USA Re-Introduce Draft?

Will USA Re-Introduce Draft?
By Sasha Uzunov
Reality Macedonia, Macedonia
Dec 22 2004
In recent weeks we have heard of the growing number of United States
military personnel deserting or threatening to sue their government
unless it stops extending their tours of duty in Iraq. It seems the
US military is having problems with manpower. Could it be possible
the Bush Administration will re-introduce the draft, conscription?
Scott Taylor, Canada’s foremost war correspondent and ex-Canadian
soldier, believes so.
“The invasion has left American soldiers and generals overworked and
at risk in the midst of an enraged Iraqi population, and citizens at
home all but certain to face a draft after the November presidential
election to shore up a mission they were told would be over in six
months,” he said.
Mr Taylor has been to Iraq over twenty times and in September of this
year was taken hostage and tortured by Iraqi militants for five days,
before being released.
The Iraq war was supposed to be short, sharp and sweet. US Defence
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was telling the world of his “shock and awe”
strategy by using a small and mobile force to knock over the Saddam
regime. But it has been nearly two years since the US ousted the
Iraqi dictator and is still battling to mop up the insurgency. In fact
Washington has realised that it needs more men to secure the “peace.”
The US Armed Forces are a volunteer professional force bolstered by
National Guard or reservists on full time service. President Nixon
abolished the draft at the tail end of the Vietnam War (1962-72),
a divisive conflict in American society.
Pundits have been quick to draw parallels between the quagmire of
Vietnam, which dragged on for a decade, and Iraq. But Iraq is more
like a disintegrating Yugoslavia of the early 1990s.
In Vietnam, 60,000 Americans lost their lives. That means 6,000
were being killed a year. So far in 18 months, US deaths in Iraq are
over 1200.
But will the Bush Administration have the political will to
re-introduce the draft? And will mainstream America accept such a
decision? Will the youth of that country comply with the call up? Is
it fair for politicians such as President George Bush and his cabinet
members, many who did not fight in Vietnam, to be sending others to
war? Ironically, the only warrior is outgoing US Secretary of State,
General Colin Powell, who served in Vietnam and was opposed to the
Iraqi adventure. Conversely, is it fair for only a small section of
society, the professional armed forces and reservists, to be carrying
the burden for the rest of society?
If the draft is introduced, will Australia follow? Militarily and
politically conscription is not needed by Australia at the moment.
Our commitment in Iraq is miniscule. It is highly improbable that
the Howard Coalition government would re-introduce National Service.
Conscription as an issue is too politically divisive.
How long is America prepared to stay in Iraq? History, and Vietnam in
particular, demonstrates that the US military has trouble fighting a
counter-insurgency or anti-guerrilla war. Can the US secure victory?
And what kind of victory will it be?
Iraq reminds me of the former Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union, both
communist federations consisting of various competing ethnic groups.
Both of these nations lasted about 70 years before fragmenting
violently into a multitude of new nation states in the early 1990s.
Iraq is a hodge-podge consisting of an ethnic Arab majority, many
of whom are Shiite or Sunni Muslim. A very small number are Arab
Christians. Add to this mixture, millions of Sunni Muslim Kurds and
Turkmans in the north of the country. Kurds are non-Arabs, whilst the
Turkmans are closely related to the Turks. Not forgetting the Assyrian
Christians, who were the original inhabitants of Iraq before being
swamped by an Islamic Arab invasion in 637 AD, more than 1300 years
ago. There are also tiny numbers of ethnic Christian Armenians, and
two little known sects, the Sabia, who worship water, and the Yazidi,
mistakenly referred to as “devil worshipers.”
Iraq has Yugoslavia written all over it. Can such a country survive
intact? Can the west, in particular the United States-lead coalition
of the willing, hold it all together? Would it be better to partition
Iraq as a long-term solution?
So many question. Only time will tell. As the old Chinese curse goes:
“may you live in interesting times!”
Sasha Uzunov is a freelance journalist who has covered the Balkans
region and is an ex-Australian soldier who served in East Timor.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

‘Russia Too Active’

‘Russia Too Active’
The Moscow Times
Monday, December 20, 2004. Page 4.
BAKU, Azerbaijan (AP) — Russia is taking too active a role in
the negotiations over the disputed Nagorny Karabakh enclave, whose
unresolved status remains a source of tension for Azerbaijan and
Armenia, Azeri President Ilham Aliyev said Friday.
Aliyev was reacting to comments by State Duma Speaker Boris Gryzlov,
who said Wednesday that Armenia was Russia’s outpost in the Caucasus
region.
“We are confused: We have always considered Armenia a state, but now
it turns out that it is an outpost,” Aliyev told reporters Friday. “So
whom should we negotiate with now — the outpost or the master of
the outpost?”
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BISNIS Armenia: List of Legal & Business Consulting Cos – 12/14/2004

Armenia: List of Legal and Business Consulting Companies
BISNIS Consulting and Services Update
14 December 2004
Now available on the BISNIS website:
Armenia: List of Legal and Business Consulting Companies
Note: These opportunities are provided solely as an informational
service and do not represent an endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Commerce.
Verification of these leads is the responsibility of the reader.
********** Forwarded by: *********************
Ellen S. House, BISNIS Trade Specialist for Consulting
U.S. Department of Commerce
Tel: 202/482-4655, Fax: 202/482-2293
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.bisnis.doc.gov

85 People Register as Donors at the Armenian Prelacy of Canada BoneM

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Armenian Prelacy of Canada
3401 Olivar Asselin
Montreal, Quebec H4J 1L5
Contact Name: Dania Ohanian
Phone: (514) 856-1200
E-mail: [email protected]
85 People Register as Donors at the Armenian Prelacy of Canada Bone Marrow
Drive
Montreal (Qc)_ 85 donors registered in the Armenian Bone Marrow Project
organized jointly by the Armenian Prelacy of Canada and the Armenian Bone
Marrow Donor Registry (ABMDR) during the first weekend of December.
The youngest clergy member, Rev. Fr. Karnig Koyounian, Pastor of Sourp Hagop
Armenian Apostolic Cathedral, was one of the first people to provide a
sample of blood for the Bone Marrow Project.
Armenian Prelacy of Canada Executive Council and Armenian Revolutionary
Federation (ARF) Canada Central Committee members also participated in the
drive, as well as school officials and members of the Montreal and Laval
chapters of the ARF Youth Organization Committee of Canada and Homenetmen
Gamk (the scouting and athletic organization).
The Bone Marrow Project is a mission of crucial importance, which was put
into place to ensure that every Armenian (and others) struck with leukemia
or other blood related diseases have the hope of finding a genetically
suitable match for a bone marrow transplant, which often is the only and
final life-saving procedure for the patient.
However, due to the lack of Armenian donors in other registries and due to
the unique genetic make up of Armenians, finding a bone marrow match is more
likely to occur among other Armenians, rendering the ABMDR the greatest hope
for Armenians, particularly since only one match is projected for every 200
donors.
Established in 1999, the ABMDR is an internationally accredited,
independent, non-governmental, non-profit organization and currently has
more than 150 patients in need of a transplant.
Founded by Dr. Frieda Jordan and Dr. Sevak Avagyan, the ABMDR is a member of
the World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA) and the World Marrow Donor
Worldwide (WMDW), and although it shares its database information with other
registries around the world, it still needs as many donors as it can
recruit.
It is not too late to become a donor, for all those interested, please visit
for further information.
-30-
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.armenianprelacy.ca
www.abmdr.am