I believe these days will be a turning point – Artsakh’s President addresses nation from Shushi

I believe these days will be a turning point – Artsakh’s President addresses nation from Shushi

Save

Share

 19:39,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 29, ARMENPRESS. President of Artsakh Arayik Harutyunyan addressed the nation from Artsakh’s Shushi city, where the President emphasized that a breakthrough must be made on the frontline. President Harutyunyan underlined that he believes in the victory of the Armenian people and urged to unify, fight and punish the enemy. ARMENPRESS presents the address of Arayik Harutyunyan.

”Dar compatriots, sisters and brothers, ny friends in Artsakh, Republic of Armenia and the Diaspora,

Like in 1992, when our triumphal march kicked off by the liberation of Shushi, today our victory is conditioned by the protection of Shushi. The enemy is just a few kilometers from here, maximum 5 kilometers.

And the main goal of the enemy is to occupy Shushi. There is a saying who controls Shushi, he controls Artsakh. And I want us to understand this point, understand not just by words, but directly participate in the protection of Shushi. For the first time in my life I was in Shushi on May 8, 1992 and was among the first ones to enter Ghazanchetsots Church and kiss the cross and I prayed and lit a candle for our victory. In reality, I believe in our victory, and I believe that these days will be a turning point. For that goal we have to unite, we have to fight and punish the enemy. But for that it’s also necessary to reach Artsakh as soon as possible. Of course, this speech is not intended for panic, just the oppositie. I again reiterate, I believe in our victory. And we have to make a breakthrough in the front line within the days and have to punish the enemy just near the gates of Shushi. Let’s unite and fight together. Of course, we understand and comprehend everything, but let’s carry out our greatest mission, for the sake of the Motherland, our future and our generations. The victory must be our, be confident, I believe in our victory”, Harutyunyan said.

[see video]
Arayik Harutyunyan also made a post on his facebook page, saying,

”Dear compatriots,

Today, in this decisive historical moment, when the Turkish-Azerbaijani and terrorist gangs, using their entire military resources, undertook an offensive at Artsakh, aimed at extermination and exile of all Artsakh Armenians, who have been living on their native soil for millennia, from their Homeland, we carry on a life and death struggle, in unequal conditions in every respect.
Now they threaten our Homeland and our existence not only along the entire frontline, but have also invested serious military resources in the direction of Shoushi, in order to capture the proud Armenian town-fortress at any cost.
Shoushi is not just a town, it is the symbol of the determination of the Armenian people to live in their own cradle, a symbol of the victories of the Armenian people. Shoushi is the beating heart of all Armenians.
As a Supreme Commander-in-Chief of Artsakh, I once again call on each and every one of you to unite and defend our Shoushi, our Artsakh, our national dignity”.

UN Secretary General welcomes Nagorno Karabakh ceasefire agreement

Save

Share

 08:42,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 26, ARMENPRESS. UN Secretary General António Guterres has welcomed the ceasefire agreement in the Nagorno Karabakh conflict zone, his spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric said in a statement. 

“The Secretary-General welcomes the joint statement issued today by the Governments of the United States, Armenia and Azerbaijan announcing that the humanitarian ceasefire agreed in Moscow on 10 October and reaffirmed in Paris on 17 October will take effect at 8 a.m., local time, on Monday 26 October. He commends the facilitation efforts of the United States, with the support of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs.
 
The Secretary-General reiterates his appeal to the parties to fully implement their agreement without delay based on this understanding and to resume substantive negotiations without preconditions under the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs.  He also calls on the parties to allow safe and unimpeded access to humanitarian workers and delivery of humanitarian assistance and services to civilians in and around the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone.
 
The Secretary-General expects the parties to abide by all their commitments and to work jointly together with the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs to make concrete steps towards a peaceful resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,” reads the statement.

Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan announced that the Armenian side will fully maintain the from 08:00 as agreed.

Editing by Stepan Kocharyan

Tensions on front line remain with mainly local clashes

Save

Share

 22:12,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 23, ARMENPRESS. The tensions on the contact line of Artsakh and Azerbaijan remain, mainly local clashes occur, ARMENPRESS reports representative of the MoD Armenia Artsrun Hovhannisyan said in a press conference.

‘’Starting from the morning the Azerbaijani armed forces continued attacks in different directions of the front line. In addition to the military operations of the front line, different civilians settlements of Artsakh were bombed, including Martakert city with nearby settlements, and Berdzor town and nearby settlements’’, Hovhannisyan said.

He added that particularly heavy clashes took place during the neutralization of the subversive groups and criminals that had penetrated near Shekher and Jivani villages in the central direction.  

‘’In this direction there are clear achievements. Shekher settlement has nearly totally been cleaned, in some places the works of neutralization are still going on. In the southern direction during the entire day the Azerbaijani units tried to attack in the direction of Vorotan, failing a number of attempts. They have been repelled, suffering serious losses. Some entire units have been dismantled, and loosing armored vehicles have fled. The tensions remain, the clashes are mainly local, near different roads, rivers’’, Hovhannisyan said.

Israeli academics ask Israel: Stop arms sales to Azerbaijan

Israel National News
Oct 18 2020
 
 
 
 
Azerbaijan is a friend of Israel, but Turkey is helping in its war against Armenia. Should Israel be selling arms to the Azeris? Op-ed.
 
Uzay Bulut , 18/10/20 10:41
 
Since September 27, Azerbaijan has launched a major offensive against the Armenian Republic of Artsakh, also known as Nagorno-Karabakh, located in the South Caucasus. Azerbaijan has since indiscriminately bombed civilians, with the direct support it receives from Turkey, who recruited jihadists from Syria and elsewhere.
 
The Israeli government, it seems, continues to sell weapons to Azerbaijan during the height of this war. In an open letter on October 5, a group of academics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem called upon the Israeli government to immediately cease these arms sales. The letter reads, in part:
 
“From a reading of independent accounts and analysis we have concluded that this outbreak of violence in the last few days is due solely to aggression of the Republic of Azerbaijan, supported by Turkey and backed up by fighters from elsewhere in the region.”
 
“This belligerence has been directed towards military and civilian targets in the Republic of Artsakh and its mainly Armenian population, and deserves to be condemned in no uncertain terms. The response of the Republic of Artsakh and the Republic of Armenia is clearly one of defense of population, property and territory, and should enjoy the support of those who cherish the principle of self-determination of peoples.”
 
On October 15, the World Union of Jewish Students (WUJS) issued a statement on the situation in Artsakh, saying, in part:
 
“We call on the Israel Government to cease all exports of weapons to Azerbaijan while the conflict is ongoing, and instead to play a role as a peace-seeking mediator.”
 
Artsakh is an integral part of historical Armenia. It has preserved its predominantly Armenian demographic character and semi-independent status as an Armenian entity despite falling under various invaders (such as Turkic nomadic tribes) throughout the centuries.
 
In 1805, the Russian Empire annexed Artsakh. In the early 1920s, Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin placed Artsakh under the administration of Soviet Azerbaijan as an autonomous oblast (administrative division) although the region was predominantly Armenian.
 
The people of Artsakh were exposed to “a policy of economic and social discrimination and political repression” at the hands of Soviet Azerbaijan. From 1988 to 1990, in response to repeated requests by the people of Artsakh for reunification with Armenia, Azerbaijan resorted to violent persecution. This included pogroms and mass killings against Armenians in Sumgait, Kirovabad, Baku, and other Azerbaijani cities. When Artsakh finally declared independence in 1991, Azerbaijan responded by launching a full-scale war against the territory, targeting civilians and destroying villages and towns.
 
Twenty-nine years later, Artsakh is once again under attack. “Nagorno-Karabakh is our land,” Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev said in a televised address to his nation on October 4. “This is the end. We showed them who we are. We are chasing them like dogs.”
 
On the same day, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) reported that in Artsakh:
 
“Hundreds of homes and key infrastructures like hospitals and schools have been destroyed or damaged by heavy artillery fire and by airborne attacks including missiles. Other infrastructures such as roads, electricity, gas, and communication networks have also been damaged. Families are on the move looking for safe shelter, while others have retreated underground to unheated basements sheltering day and night from violence.”
 
Despite the temporary ceasefire brokered by Russia announced on October 10, Azerbaijan continues indiscriminately shelling Artsakh, including its capital, Stepanakert. Azerbaijani armed forces even targeted a hospital, where civilians are receiving medical treatment, Artsakh Beklaryan, the region’s human rights ombudsman, reported on October 14.
 
Azeri-Turkish wanton violence against Armenian civilians and residential areas confirms what Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan announced on October 7:
 
“What we are facing is an Azeri-Turkish international terroristic attack,” he told Sky News. “To me there is no doubt that this is a policy of continuing the Armenian genocide and a policy of reinstating the Turkish empire.”
 
Pashinyan was referring to the 1913-23 Christian genocide against Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks at the hands of Ottomans and nationalist Turks, who largely wiped out the victims from their ancient homeland.
 
On October 11, Arayik Harutyunyan, the president of Artsakh Republic, posted on Twitter:
 
“Israel is aware its weapons are used against the civilian population in Artsakh. Israeli drones were used for offensive & not defensive purposes back in April 2016. They are accomplices of Azerbaijan’s genocidal policy, despite being a nation that survived genocide.”
 
Meanwhile, Azerbaijani-Turkish attacks have displaced half of Artsakh’s population, according to its rights ombudsman Beklaryan.
 
“They left because of the shelling of civilians,” said the president of Armenia, Armen Sarkissian, in an interview with the German newspaper Bild. “And it wasn’t just one bomb that killed people, and not two bombs. There is shelling every day! Look at Stepanakert from the air… It looks like German cities during the Second World War.” (Not a very useful comparison to Israeli ears, as the Allied forces and Jews felt that the bombing of German cities was well-deserved.)
 
Arthur Atanesyan, a professor at the department of Applied Sociology of Yerevan State University, said that “By providing offensive weaponry to Azerbaijan, and especially in times of active offensive operations by Azerbaijan, backed by Turkey, on the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, any state, including Israel, becomes a supporter of the anti-democratic forces.”
 
He continued:
 
“Turkey with its authoritarian leader and Azerbaijan as a totalitarian state with no political opposition and no freedoms and with many jailed journalists and aggressive rhetoric about the region, instrumentalized regional conflicts as a tool for their national identity construction. Hate speech is the only message constantly expressed by the Azerbaijani leading clan about other parties of negotiation process around Karabakh conflict, and military actions toward civilians in Karabakh are their way of conflict behavior aimed at another Genocide of Armenians on their homeland.
 
“Any third state supporting Azerbaijan politically and/or militarily, assists to the continued attempts of these two Turkish states to repeat the Genocide of Armenians that was committed by Turkey one hundred years ago and that still remains unpunished. And any military or political assistance by the third states to the Turkish aggression in Karabakh serves the criminal elites in both states of ‘the same nation’. It is important to note that Islamists and terrorists have also been invited by Turkish leaders to fight against democratic Armenian society in Karabakh and in Armenia.
 
“Having being exposed to the terrible crime of Holocaust by Nazi Germany, the Israeli society must feel and understand the suffering of Armenian civilians in Karabakh, and immediately ban its government from providing offensive weaponry to the totalitarian regime of Azerbaijan in order not to serve as a tool for the two Turkish states, and not to appear in the list of assistants of another cruel crime.”
 
On October 13, the Israeli High Court of Justice rejected a petition to ban arms sales to Azerbaijan “as lacking evidence to justify a hearing on whether they have been used for war crimes against Armenia,” reported The Jerusalem Post.
 
“Since the beginning of the war the Armenian side has been publishing photo and video evidence that proves the deployment of cluster munitions from Israel to Azerbaijan,” said historian Anahit Khosroeva, a professor at Yerevan State University. She continued:
 
“However, Israel’s High Court of Justice rejected a petition to ban arms sales to Azerbaijan.,,We, Armenians, do not see any solidarity from the people who went through the Holocaust.
 
“Since the current war in Artsakh started, I believe additional weapons were brought from Israel to Azerbaijan three times. The cargo planes of the Azerbaijani Silk way airlines, majority of whose shares belong to Azerbaijani president Aliyev’s daughter, have been operating flights from Baku to Israeli’s Uvda region, where Israel has an airbase, and back. As a genocide scholar, I strongly condemn that even during Artsakh war, Israel continues to supply arms and weapons to Azerbaijan, which, certainly, exacerbates the situation along the frontline. By now the Israeli government should know that the weapons they sell are being used against the civilian population not only of Artsakh, but also of the Republic of Armenia. This is unacceptable.”
 
Armenia said on October 1 that it had recalled its ambassador to Israel over their arms sales to Azerbaijan, who has acknowledged using Israeli-made weapons against Artsakh. “While the Israeli Defense Ministry does not publish details of sales by country, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev in 2016 said his country had bought $4.85 billion in defense equipment from the Jewish state,” according to an op-ed on Arutz Sheva.
 
Yoav Loeff, a lecturer of Armenian history and language at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, commented:
 
“I think that the selling of Israeli weapons to Azerbaijan is problematic for three main reasons. The first and most important one is the humanitarian factor ‒ we see that Azerbaijan acts again and again as an aggressor, both towards the Republic of Artsakh and towards Armenia itself. In this current war, the Azeri side has been using masses of weapons, including Israeli ones, to deliberately target civilian population. This is immoral and violates the international law. Israel should stop providing weapons that are used this way.
 
“A second important reason is that one sided military involvement in the South Caucasus harms the tightening of relationship between Israel and Armenia (e.g., Armenia’s recent returning of its ambassador who had just arrived in Israel). The third reason is the fact that Azerbaijan cooperates in the current war with Islamic extremists. That raises the concern that although Israel and Azerbaijan are currently in good relations, ideas and interests may change over time, and we should be worried about possibilities that the Israeli weapons that were sold to Azerbaijan may be used in the future against Israel itself or against Israel ‘s allies. For all these reasons, it would be wise if the Israeli government reassesses its policy in the South Caucasus and the ways to make it more balanced.
 
“Also, the war over the tiny piece of land of Artsakh / Nagorno Karabakh seems to become more and more a matter of world politics. With the deep involvement of Russia, Turkey and other international forces, the future developments are very difficult to predict. Massive involvement of Israel with one side (the Azeri one) may lead to unpredictable complications. This may be an additional reason for Israel to reconsider its involvement.”
 
As of October 12, over 500 members of the Artsakh army have lost their lives, according to Armenian sources. Azerbaijan does not disclose military casualties. The Armenian Weekly reported on October 14 that “at least 70 civilians on both sides of the contact line have been killed with over one hundred wounded.” On October 15, video footage from the village of Hadrut in Artsakh emerged of Azeri soldiers capturing and later executing two Armenian soldiers. Mistreatment and murder of prisoners of war is prohibited under the Third Geneva Convention and is considered a war crime.
 
Donna Shalev, a Professor of Classical Studies of Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said:
 
“I have great respect for the cultural and intellectual legacies of Armenia over the generations. I also empathize deeply with the Armenians’ right to life after all that they have suffered. Most of all, I am politically and morally concerned with and hugely disappointed by the foreign policy actions by some elements in the Israeli government; civilized people here did not sign up for selling arms to an aggressor, just as we have for a long time been disappointed with the ‘realpolitik’-motivated avoidance of officially recognizing the Armenian holocaust.”
 
Meanwhile, Jewish Armenians have also expressed their fears stemming from Israel’s arms sales to Azerbaijan. Journalist Lara Setrakian wrote for Haaretz: “An Armenian Jewish friend came over to my home in Yerevan. She is anguished. ‘Armenians are David,’ she says, and asks: ‘Why is Israel arming a genocidal Goliath?'”
 
Suren Aghasi Manukyan, the head of the department of Comparative Genocide Studies at Yerevan’s Armenian Genocide Museum and Institute, noted:
 
“As a scholar who engaged many years in genocide studies, I believe that genocide totally transforms society. It changes its understanding of human nature and worldview. It provides the victim community high empathy and compassion. The societies that have gone through genocide are more sensitive to others’ sufferings and pains, and indeed it should get a lot more selective in making friends and alliances. And we expect such a stance from Israel.”
 
“Now Israeli weapons are used by Azerbaijan to target civilians and civilian infrastructure in Artsakh and Armenia. It is time for civil society of Israel, academics, cultural and religious leaders to demand from their government to reconsider and cease arm-sales agreements with Azerbaijan as its policy can be considered not only as warning signs for genocide but also as genocidal in nature themselves; as conspiracy to commit genocide, direct and public incitement to commit genocide and attempt to commit genocide, which according to the UN Genocide Convention are acts that all states of the world are obliged to prevent and punish.”
 
In 2019, Israeli historian professors Benny Morris and Dror Ze’evi co-published a ground-breaking book, The Thirty-Year Genocide: Turkey’s Destruction of Its Christian Minorities, 1894–1924, in which they documented Ottoman Turkey’s genocide against Armenians, Assyrians and Greeks. Professor Ze’evi, who teaches at the Department of Middle East Studies of the Ben Gurion University of the Negev, said:
 
“The recent bout of warfare in Nagorno Karabagh/Artsakh has no justification. This current flare-up emerged mainly from Azeri president Aliyev’s internal problems and from Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s aggressive (and perhaps expansionist) foreign policy that we have seen in Syria, Iraq, Libya, the Aegean, and even inside Turkey. Azerbaijan and Turkey have taken advantage of the paralysis in the world as a result of the coronavirus pandemic and America’s isolationism under Donald Trump, to further their aims in this battle-torn region.
 
“I believe we should not supply arms to any of the sides in this clearly immoral and vicious campaign. I also believe, as do many other Jews, that we who have suffered atrocities in the past should not assist an act of violence directed against a nation that has suffered as much as the Armenians did through modern history. I know Israel has a long friendship and a clear strategic interest in keeping good relations with Azerbaijan, but it has no business assisting it with arms shipments. Israel should send a field hospital, food and medicine, or even peacekeepers, but we should not have Israeli war machines participating in this war.” 
 

TURKISH press: Aliyev warns of consequences if Armenia targets oil, gas pipelines

Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev speaks during an address to the nation in Baku, Azerbaijan, Oct. 9, 2020. (REUTERS Photo)

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said Wednesday that Armenia was trying to attack oil and gas pipelines in Azerbaijan and that the outcome will be severe if Armenians try to take control of them.

“Armenia is trying to attack and take control of our pipelines,” Aliyev said in an interview with Turkish broadcaster Habertürk. “If Armenia tries to take control of the pipelines there, I can say that the outcome will be severe for them.”

Last week, Armenian forces launched a missile attack on the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline in the city of Yevlakh.

The BTC pipeline delivers Azerbaijan’s light crude oil – mainly from the Azeri-Chirag-Gunashli field – through Georgia to Turkey’s Mediterranean port of Ceyhan for export via tankers.

Azerbaijan had described the attack as a “terrorist act” and highlighted the pipeline’s important role in Europe’s energy security.

Instability in this region has the potential to directly affect the BTC crude oil pipeline, the Southern Natural Gas Pipeline and the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway.

Aliyev also said that Turkey should participate in talks on the Armenian-occupied region of Nagorno-Karabakh and that the conflict cannot be solved without Ankara’s involvement.

He added that Azerbaijan has Turkish F-16 jets but that they were not being used in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Azerbaijani and Armenian forces.

Nagorno-Karabakh has seen heavy fighting over the recent weeks which has claimed the lives of 600 people, including civilians. The region is considered by the United Nations and international law to be part of Azerbaijan.

Azerbaijan has so far liberated more than 20 villages in Nagorno-Karabakh since clashes broke out between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces in late September.

The clashes began on Sept. 27 when Armenian forces targeted civilian Azerbaijani settlements and military positions in the region, leading to casualties.

Pashinyan Discusses Artsakh with Opposition Leaders

October 13,  2020



Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan held a meeting with Armenia’s opposition parties on Oct. 12

YEREVAN (Azatutyun.am)—Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan met on Monday with senior members of several Armenian opposition groups, including the former ruling Republican Party, to discuss the situation in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone.

The meeting was held behind the closed doors and Pashinyan made no public statements afterwards.

Pashinyan’s press office said he briefed them on diplomatic and other steps taken by the Armenian government in response to the “war unleashed by Azerbaijan with Turkey’s backing.”

It said he also answered questions asked by the representatives of the Republican Party of Armenia, the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, former President Levon Ter-Petrosian’s Armenian National Congress and several other opposition parties not represented in the parliament.

“The representatives of the political forces presented their observations and proposals regarding the fight against the enemy and further actions,” the office added in a statement.
Participants of the meeting also gave few details.

“We made very clear what we think now,” the ARF’s Ishkhan Saghatelyan told RFE/RL’s Armenian Service. “I just cannot publicize that given the martial law and things that cannot be disclosed at this point.”

Saghatelyan said his party disagrees with Pashinyan’s Karabakh-related policy but declined to elaborate. “We have many concerns which we voiced in a very clear and direct way,” he said.

Pashinyan held a separate meeting on Sunday with senior lawmakers representing his My Step bloc and the two parliamentary opposition parties, Bright Armenia and Prosperous Armenia. Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanyan also attended it.

“It was an open conversation,” My Step’s Arman Yeghoyan said on Monday. “The prime minister answered all questions.”

“It’s a war and the situation is very difficult,” said Bright Armenia leader Edmon Marukyan. “The fate of our state and each of us is now being determined on the battlefield.”

TURKISH press: ECtHR decision to take interim measures against Turkey lacks legal basis, Foreign Ministry says

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hami Aksoy (AA Photo)

Turkey’s Foreign Ministry on Wednesday criticized a decision by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) to take interim measures against the country at the request of Armenia, which is locked in a conflict with Azerbaijan.

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hami Aksoy said in a statement that the ECtHR’s move dealt a blow to its credibility and reputation as it lacked any legal basis and the court did not even consult with the Turkish government.

“By adopting this decision based on social media posts and press reports submitted by Armenia to promote its groundless allegations and by no means requesting our Government’s observations, the ECtHR has dealt a blow to its credibility and reputation,” Aksoy said.

The ECtHR’s decision was based on political, not judicial reasons, said Aksoy, adding the court was not aware of the realities on the ground.

“With this decision, the ECtHR has unfortunately become an instrument to the efforts of certain circles to abuse the law and tarnished the reputation that it has built in its 70-year history in the field of human rights,” it added.

Clashes broke out between the two former Soviet republics on Sept. 27, when Armenian forces targeted Azerbaijani civilian settlements and military positions in the region, leading to casualties.

Relations between the two countries have been tense since 1991, when the Armenian military occupied Nagorno-Karabakh, an internationally recognized territory of Azerbaijan.

Several United Nations resolutions as well as many international organizations demand the withdrawal of the invading forces.

The OSCE Minsk Group – co-chaired by France, Russia and the U.S. – was formed in 1992 to find a peaceful solution to the conflict, but to no avail. A cease-fire, however, was reached in 1994.

Many world powers, including Russia, France and the U.S., have urged an immediate cease-fire. Turkey, meanwhile, has supported Baku’s right to self-defense.

Azeris use Israeli-made drones as conflict escalates with Armenia — report

The Times of Israel
Sept 30 2020

The Azeri military has been using Israeli-made attack drones during the recent uptick in violence with neighboring Armenia, Hikmet Hajiyev, assistant to the president of Azerbaijan, said in an interview with the Israeli Walla news outlet Wednesday.

Heavy fighting between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces over the separatist region of Nagorno-Karabakh continued for a fourth straight day on Wednesday, in the biggest escalation in years of a decades-old conflict that has killed dozens and left scores of others wounded.

In the interview, Hajiyev said that his country has used Israeli drones, including loitering munitions, or “kamikaze drones,” in the recent round of fighting and lauded their effectiveness.

“Hats off to the engineers who designed it,” Hajiyev said.

He also said that the Azeris “very much appreciate the cooperation with Israel, especially the defense cooperation.”

Israel and Azerbaijan enjoy security and import agreements and it is speculated that Israel supplies 60 percent of the Azeri military’s armaments, while Azerbaijan supplies a large amount of natural fuel to the Jewish state.

Asked if he was disappointed by the silence from Israel regarding the recent fighting, Hajiyev said unequivocally, “No, no, Israel and Azerbaijan understand our situation,” and cited the multiple agreements between the two nations.

Asked about recent sightings of Azeri cargo planes that reportedly landed in Israeli military bases, and if Israel was supplying Azerbaijan with weapons for the current round of fighting, Hajiyev said he didn’t think so and brushed the question off, citing the defense agreements between the two nations, and noting that they are not a secret.

Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry said Armenian forces started shelling the town of Tartar on Wednesday morning, damaging “civilian infrastructure” and wounding people, while Armenian military officials reported that Azerbaijani forces were bombing positions of the Nagorno-Karabakh army in the north of the war-torn region.

Armenian officials alleged that Turkish drones and F-16 fighter jets were being used. Turkey has denied supplying Azerbaijan with arms, and Azerbaijan said it didn’t have any F-16 jets.

The fighting in Nagorno-Karabakh erupted Sunday and has continued despite mounting calls for a ceasefire from around the globe.

Nagorno-Karabakh lies within Azerbaijan but has been under the control of ethnic Armenian forces backed by the Armenian government since 1994, at the end of a separatist war following the breakup of the Soviet Union three years earlier.

The region in the Caucasus Mountains of about 4,400 square kilometers (1,700 square miles), or about the size of the US state of Delaware, is 50 kilometers (30 miles) from the Armenian border. Soldiers backed by Armenia also occupy some Azerbaijani territory outside the region.

The conflict escalated on Tuesday, with Armenia alleging Turkish involvement and claiming that a Turkish F-16 fighter jet shot down an SU-25 from its air force in Armenian airspace, killing the pilot.

Turkey, which has been vocal about siding with Azerbaijan in the dispute, denied those claims, and so did Azerbaijan.

In the meantime, European officials are seeking to bring the opposing sides to the negotiating table.

French President Emmanuel Macron, speaking on Wednesday at a news conference in Riga, Latvia, called for talks between France, Russia and the United States — the three countries co-chair the Minsk group, set up in 1992 by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe to resolve the conflict — to mediate.

“I will speak to President (Vladimir) Putin tonight and, I think, President (Donald) Trump tomorrow to discuss and propose an exit strategy” for the crisis, Marcon said.


Tsarukyan’s arrest ‘deafened public outcry’ over ‘secret’ Armenian-Azerbaijani processes – politician

Tert.am, Armenia
Sept 26 2020
With the political decision to arrest Gagik Tsarukyan under the pretext of vote-buying in the 2017 parliamentary election, the Armenian authorities practically managed to deafen the public outcry over the reported secret talks with Azerbaijan in defiance of our national interest, says Artur Ghazinyan, the leader of the opposition One Armenia party.

In a public post on Facebook, the politician slams the criminal case against the Prosperous Armenia party’s (PAP) leader as an attempt to “tone down” the noise over the recent “confessions”.

He also warns of “extremely dangerous” processes over Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh), highlighting the national security and territorial integrity threats to the two Armenian republics.

“At this critical moment, the travelling circus – with its clowns and journalists provoking intrigues – will go away from Armenia, leaving us with a Fatherland at the threshold of a calamity, which we will protect again, win and rebuild,” Ghazinyan says.


Aliyev’s statements “deeply disappointing” – Armenian MFA

Public Radio of Armenia
Sept 20 2020

The Armenian Foreign Ministry says Azerbaijani President’s statements during the founding ceremony of the offshore operations of the “Absheron” field are deeply disappointing.

“They demonstrate the inability of the leader of the neighboring country to perceive soberly and without painful emotions the existing reality and his own role in the creation of that reality,” Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Anna Naghdalyan said in a statement.

The comments come after Aliyev “warned” Armenia to drop “its ugly plans” and threatened “serious consequences.”

Aliyev accused Armenia of “preparing for a new war” and concentrating forces near the line of contact.

“Such rhetoric, containing obviously groundless and even false allegations, does not dignify any head of state,” Naghdalyan said.

“We realize the damages inflicted by Azerbaijan on the peace process by the April 2016 aggression and the military escalation initiated in July 2020. In order to prevent these damages from becoming irreversible, the government of Azerbaijan should reconsider its policy of the use of force and threat of force, renounce its attempts to destabilize the regional peace and security by involving non-regional players, and prepare itself for a peaceful settlement,” the Spokesperson added.

She stressed that Armenia is confident in its capacities to protect the right of the people of Artsakh for self-determination and the right to live in their historical homeland, and reiterated that there is no alternative to the peaceful resolution of the conflict.