Kurds throw stones at anti-Armenian Turkish minister (VIDEO)

Kurds throw stones at anti-Armenian Turkish minister (VIDEO)

August 20, 2012 | 13:01

Turkey’s Internal Affairs Minister Idris Naim Sahin – who had made an
anti-Armenian and xenophobia-inciting speech during the demonstration
which was held in downtown Istanbul on February 26 and under the name
of remembering the incidents in Khojaly – was thrown stones at by the
Kurds living in Turkey’s Hakkari Province in the southeast.

After the Ramadan evening meal, Sahin, who had arrived in
Kurdish-populated Hakkari to observe Ramadan with the security forces,
tried to walk in Hakkari’s central street, but he was met by a violent
protest, Hurriyet daily of Turkey informs.

Those who gathered began to whistle and throw stones at the Minister.
The panicking security forces started shooting in the air and use
watering vehicles and tear gas to disperse the protesters.

The Minister was made to enter a café, under strict security measures,
from where he was transferred to the Provincial Hall with armored
vehicles.

From: Baghdasarian

http://news.am/eng/news/117748.html

Anti-Turkey Conspiracy On Syria

Anti-Turkey Conspiracy On Syria

Igor Muradyan, The Golos Armeniy

Story from Lragir.am News:

Published: 11:11:06 – 20/08/2012

The category of conspiracy has always been and will be a component of
the operational policy, and currently the importance of non-public
policy has become even more significant, including that on quite
visible and evident developments.

No conspiracy exists relating to Syria, it is not necessary. The game
is quite cynical, hypocritical and rather silly but it does not bother
the initiators and players. The Syrian issue has quite direct causes
related to certain geopolitical and geo-economic goals. For decades
the U.S., France, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Russia, Turkey and
Israel has been struggling for Syria.

The elimination of the strong Arab country in the area of the `Fertile
Crescent’, following the elimination of Iraq, leads to full
destruction of the geopolitical construction which many Arab states
consider archaic and obsolete, as well as it leads to full obedience
of the Arab world to the U.S. and its partners, and to the
strengthening security of Israel, to the possible integration of
Israel with the Arab community.

No large-scale political operation by the U.S. for the last 20 years
in the Middle East was carried out without agreeing it with Arab
countries. The Arab states except Syria recognized the U.S. as the one
and only guarantor of their security. The hostile attitude of Arab
countries to Syria is caused by this circumstance, and repression of
the Shia factor is a uniting factor for the Sunni Arab states.

The U.S. and France, as well as the Great Britain are interested in
preserving the territorial integrity of Syria for the following
reasons. Having lost influence on the Syrian territory, France is
losing the only strategic `area’ in the Middle East, including
Lebanon.

The U.S. will face the threat of formation of a radical-Islamic Sunni
state, which will have a destructive influence on Iraq. The U.S. and
Great Britain view Syria as a direction of transportation of the Iraq
oil (of approximately 200 million tons) which ensures `bypaths’ of the
Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal and Turkey’s territory. By the way,
such emasculated and overly pragmatic goals and tasks need different
approaches. Such issues cannot be solved by way of `alienated
approaches’ but Obama’s administration is hardly able to understand
this.

However, the main victim of this adventure is not Syria but Turkey to
which the following cynical requirements are puts forth, namely Turkey
can actively contribute to blockade, pressure and elimination of
Assad’s regime; Turkey maintains intelligence, communication,
adaptation of Saudi Arabia assets; it develops pseudo-democratic
rhetoric staying loyal to the principles of pseudo-humanism; Turkey
cannot expect military aid and NATO intervention and has no right to
military intervention even with the escalating situation in the
Kurdish regions; Turkey has no right to any intervention in northern
Iraq, including in the oil projects (it is not its share of global
business and its zone of influence, it can only deal with trade and
construction).

Hence, until the solution of the Syrian crisis Turkey will be facing
the prospect of geopolitical blockade and isolation in the direction
of the Middle East, which was expected. Hillary Clinton’s visit to
Ankara was a gravestone for the doctrine of neo-Ottomanism. Turkey was
told the following: `You were offered a very meaningful partnership at
the condition of coordination and harmonization of efforts. You
refused that and sought independence. Now you have all the
opportunities for `free floating’ but, of course, at certain
conditions which are not agreed with you but introduced to you.’

The aforementioned visit is certainly aimed at defining the `rights
and freedom limits’ of Turkey in the Middle East, rather than
discussing its relations with Syria. At the same time, it is necessary
to take into account that the Obama administration in which no
significant expert or functionary on Turkey has ever appeared holds a
tough position.

What could the Republicans and their large groups of experts on Turkey
and Middle East have done? Turkey is pushed towards Eurasia, that is
Central Asia, but at the same time, the South Caucasus is pointed out
by the Americans as a restricted area for Turkey’s interests. This is
the end.

It is noteworthy that the U.S., France and the main lobbyist of Turkey
Great Britain have joined efforts for the geopolitical blockade of
Turkey. France and the UK direct a large squadron to the Eastern
Mediterranean, thus repeating the trick used in Lebanon where Turkey
was denied access. At the same time, Turkey cannot turn either to
Russia or China to which it introduced itself not as a U.S. tool but
as an independent player the interests of which contradict to the
interest of the Eurasian superpowers. Iran and Israel are not
delighted with its policy either. Next in line is the international
recognition of the genocide of 1915. The trap closed catching Turkey.
This is the plot.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments27121.html

Armenian chess players prepare for Olympiad in Tsaghkadzor

Armenian chess players prepare for Olympiad in Tsaghkadzor

10:52, 20 August, 2012

YEREVAN, AUGUST 20, ARMENPRESS: Armenian national chess teams began
their last training in Tsaghkadzor preparing for 40th Chess Olympiad
which will take place in Istanbul since August 27 till September 27.
Armenpress was informed about this from Armenian chess federation.

In the staff of Armenian male national chess team are included
grandmasters Levon Aronyan (2825), Vladimir Hakobyan, Sergey Movsisyan
(2698), Gabriel Sargsyan (2679) and Tigran Petrosyan (2657). The coach
of the team is Arshak Petrosyan.

In the staff of Armenian female national chess team are included
grandmasters Elina Danielyan, Lilit Lazarian, Lilit Galoyan and Maria
Kursova as well as Anna Hayrapetyan. The coach of Armenian female
national chess team is grandmaster Arthur Chibukhchyan.

Armenian male chess team has won Olympiads in Turin (2006) and in
Dresden (2008).

From: Baghdasarian

Turkish Interior Minister was attacked with stones

Turkish Interior Minister was attacked with stones

14:13, 19 August, 2012

YEREVAN, JULY 19, ARMENPRESS: Turkish Interior Minister �°dris Naim
Ã?Â?ahin was attacked by a group who threw stones at him on Saturday
during a visit he paid to the southeastern province of Hakkari.
As Armenpress reports citing Zaman, Ã?Â?ahin was touring Hakkari and
chatting with shop owners along the Cumhuriyet Street when he was
attacked by a group of people who were chanting slogans in favor of
the terrorist Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). Security forces
intervened after the group threw stones at the minister, who suffered
no injuries. The minister was circled by police and taken to a nearby
shop. Police used pepper gas to disperse the group.

From: Baghdasarian

Sa Sainteté Aram 1er a reçu l’ancien président libanais Amin Gemayel

LIBAN
Sa Sainteté Aram 1er a reçu l’ancien président libanais Amin Gemayel

Le 14 août 2012 l’ancien Président du Liban et chef du parti Phalange
a rencontré Sa Sainteté Aram 1er.

Pendant la réunion de deux heures ils ont discuté de la situation dans
le Moyen-Orient, des défis auxquels font face les Chrétiens dans la
région et les inquiétudes au Liban.

lundi 20 août 2012,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

From: Baghdasarian

ISTANBUL: Former US envoy joins think tank

Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
Aug 20 2012

Former US envoy joins think tank

ANKARA – Hürriyet Daily News
Matt Bryza just completed a 23-year career as a US diplomat. AP photo

Ümit Enginsoy

Matt Bryza, the former U.S. ambassador to Azerbaijan, who was never
confirmed by the Senate for the job, has joined the Jamestown
Foundation in Washington, a think tank specializing in terrorism
matters, the foundation said in a statement late Aug. 16.

U.S. President Barack Obama chose Bryza in late 2009 to head the
embassy in Baku, but the strong Armenian lobby in the Senate blocked
the confirmation efforts there, accusing Bryza, who has a Turkish
wife, of being too pro-Turkish on Armenian and Azerbaijani matters.

As two pro-Armenian senators continued their opposition to Bryza last
year and made this public, the Obama administration did not insist on
him. According to U.S. law, Bryza, who had failed to win the Senate’s
confirmation for two successive years, had to leave his post as
ambassador to Baku.

Bryza just completed a 23-year career as a U.S. diplomat, over half of
which was spent at the center of policy-making and international
negotiations on major energy infrastructure projects and regional
conflicts in Eurasia. Currently Bryza resides in Istanbul, where he
also works as a consultant on business and democratic development and
is a board member of several private companies.

August/20/2012

From: Baghdasarian

Iran, Armenia to build power plants together

Mehr news agency, Iran
Aug 18 2012

Iran, Armenia to build power plants together

The managing director of Iranian Water and Power Resources Development
Company, Mohammad-Reza Rezazadeh, has said that Iran and Armenia will
construct two power plants together, Mehr news agency reported on 18
August.

“Iran and Armenia will construct two 130-MW power plants together in
both countries,” Mehr quoted Rezazadeh as saying.

He was also quoted as saying that 15 years after the inauguration of
the power plants, they would become property of the country they were
constructed in.

From: Baghdasarian

Hausse du prix du pain en Arménie

ARMENIE
Hausse du prix du pain en Arménie

Les prix au détail du pain en Arménie ont augmenté d’environ 10 pour
cent au cours de deux dernières semaines après une hausse des des prix
internationaux pour le blé et les autres céréales.

Les pains sont l’alimentation principale dans le pays et coûtent entre
100 drams et 180 drams (0,24 $ et 0,44$) pièce dans la plupart des
magasins d’Erevan. La hausse des prix a été principalement sentie par
les arméniens qui son mal payés et qui consomme le pain en de grandes
quantités.

« Le pain est maintenant plus cher et il pèse aussi moins » s’est
plainte une femme. « Nous avions l’habitude d’acheter cinq pains par
jour. Mais nous maintenant nous en achetons seulement trois pains ».

« La situation du peuple devient insupportable en Arménie » a dit un
autre acheteur dans un dépôt de pain dans la capitale.

Les prix du blé dans la bourse des marchandises internationales sont
en hausse du 50 pour cent depuis le milieu de juin en raison
principalement d’une sévère sécheresse aux Etats-Unis, le plus grand
producteur au monde de céréales.

Les conditions météorologiques non favorables en Russie, en Ukraine et
dans beaucoup de pays de l’Europe sont aussi un facteur.

L’Arménie compte sur les importations de grains pour répondre à plus
de 60 pour cent de la demande intérieure de blé estimé à 650 000
tonnes par an.

Armen Poghosian, le chef de l’Union des Consommateurs, a minimisé
l’importance des facteurs externes. Il a prétendu que la hausse
intérieure des prix a principalement résulté d’un manque de
compétition dans les importations de blé. Plus de 70 pour cent de ces
importations sont contrôlés par deux sociétés appartenant à des
entrepreneurs proches du gouvernement.

« L’état doit prendre des mesures protectrices pour arrêter la hauuse
constante des prix » a dit Armen Poghosian au service arménien de
RFE/RL (Azatutyun.am). Il a soutenu que les citoyens les plus pauvres
du pays sont frappés les plus durement par l’augmentation du coût du
pain et de la farine.

Cette hausse des prix du pain pourrait avoir effet négatif sur
l’inflation dans le pays.

dimanche 19 août 2012,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

From: Baghdasarian

Armeni e caucasici, in partenza dalla Siria

Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso, Italia
14 agosto 2012

Armeni e caucasici, in partenza dalla Siria

Marilisa Lorusso
14 agosto 2012

Tra chi cerca di sfuggire al conflitto in Siria vi sono anche migliaia
di membri della diaspora armena e circassa che si erano stanziati in
medio oriente a partire dal XIX secolo. Guardano ad Armenia e Russia
in cerca di tranquillità. Un processo che può avere molte implicazioni

La Siria ospita una numerosa minoranza armena, stabilitasi in medio
oriente a partire da tempi antichi, ma numericamente accresciuta
significativamente in seguito al genocidio degli armeni nell’allora
impero ottomano. Approssimativamente 100.000 armeni si concentrano in
particolare nella città di Aleppo, anche se vi sono centri abitati
come Kesab a maggioranza armena. La comunità armena locale non è
originaria del Caucaso, ma sentendo minacciata la propria sicurezza
per via del conflitto in corso e degli incerti sviluppi, migliaia di
loro hanno già deciso di cercare rifugio nell’Armenia indipendente di
oggi.

Una minoranza in pericolo

Yerevan ha seguito con apprensione la crisi e si sta muovendo a tutela
della minoranza, nei margini dei grandi disagi che i combattimenti
stanno causando. Così mentre le sedi diplomatiche, inclusa quella
azerbaijana chiudono, quella armena non solo rimane aperta, ma il
consolato di Aleppo viene spostato temporaneamente in prossimità degli
insediamenti a maggiore concentrazione armena. Lo scopo è offrire
assistenza ai cittadini siriani di origine armena, in una fase in cui
le comunicazioni sono interrotte o difficoltose, o facilitarne
l’uscita dal paese. A giugno il ministero della Diaspora armeno aveva
dichiarato la disponibilità ad aiutare i residenti in pericolo o
difficoltà. E che dei re-insediamenti ci siano stati risulta evidente
anche dall’apertura di corsi di lingua per gli armeni siriani a
Yerevan (gli armeni di Siria parlano una varietà di armeno diversa –
l’armeno occidentale – rispetto a quella diffusa nell’Armenia
contemporanea) e da dichiarazioni pubbliche di associazioni benefiche
come Orran che si sono offerte di aiutare i profughi. Profughi che
entrano in Armenia spesso non più come cittadini siriani: una seduta
straordinaria del governo ha decretato una facilitazione del regime di
naturalizzazione per gli armeni di Siria, che ora possono ricevere il
passaporto e la cittadinanza presso l’ambasciata di Damasco, il
consolato di Aleppo e la rappresentanza diplomatica in Libano. Un
processo sicuramente concordato con le autorità di Damasco e portato
avanti con discrezione, per evitare che risulti come un atto di
tradimento verso la patria siriana, cosa che potrebbe esporre la
minoranza a ritorsioni. Intanto Armavia, la compagnia di bandiera di
Yerevan, ha cominciato un servizio di voli regolari con Damasco per
portare i bambini armeni a `passare l’estate’ in Armenia, e certo sono
fra i pochi aerei civili che decollano e atterrano in Siria, laddove
anche Aeroflot ha sospeso i voli.

Cautela è la parola d’ordine: dell’ipotesi di un post-Assad, evocato a
gran voce sulla stampa occidentale, i media armeni hanno cominciato a
parlare solo a luglio e valutando sempre e in primis l’impatto sulla
comunità dei connazionali che risiede nel paese. Alexander
Iskandaryan, direttore del Caucasus Institute di Yerevan, sottolinea
che il teatro siriano è fin peggiore di quello libico con il rischio
di una micro-frammentazione in città e piccole unità amministrative
ingestibili dal potere centrale, dove sparute minoranze armene si
troverebbero esposte a enormi rischi.

Nuovi karabakhi?

La notizia dell’arrivo di armeni dalla Siria ha suscitato immediate
reazioni da parte dell’Azerbaijan, che in una nota ufficiale del 6
agosto ha segnalato ai Co-Presidenti del Minsk Group la propria
preoccupazione per eventuali nuovi insediamenti nei `territori
occupati’ dagli armeni del Nagorno Karabakh, territorio rimasto
spopolato dopo il conflitto.

Le autorità de facto del Nagorno Karabakh, pur riaffermando il diritto
sovrano dell’autoproclamatesi repubblica di accettare tutti i migranti
che ritiene, non confermano che sia in corso un’accoglienza di
profughi da Aleppo o dalle altre zone della Siria interessate dai
combattimenti. Anzi, reagendo alle accuse di stare alterando
deliberatamente la composizione demografica dell’area, già
significativamente sbilanciata a causa degli sfollamenti del periodo
bellico che hanno causato di fatto la scomparsa della comunità azera,
il de facto governo del Karabakh ha ricordato i report delle missioni
dell’OSCE che non avevano confermato l’ipotesi di un ripopolamento
armeno nelle regioni de jure ancora azerbaijane. Missioni che però
precedono la crisi siriana.

Conseguenze all’ONU e oltre

Ad agosto l’Armenia è stata uno dei 31 stati ad astenersi in sede ONU
alla risoluzione sulla crisi siriana. Non fra gli astenuti, bensì fra
chi si è opposto alla risoluzione del 3 agosto c’è la Russia. Fra le
varie speculazioni legate alle attività russe in Siria, spesso viene
trascurato il fenomeno della `nuova storica’ minoranza russa che vi
risiede. Comparare il caso armeno e quello russo è interessante,
perché i processi sono i medesimi: naturalizzazioni e
passaportizzazioni veloci, trasferimento nella `patria storica’ ed
eventuale inserimento, previo corso di lingua e quant’altro. I `russi’
di Siria sono caucasici che si trovano in Siria perché i loro antenati
non avevano accettato di essere russi. Sono cioè i cabardini, i
circassi e i discendenti di altre minoranze nord e sud caucasiche che
erano migrate nell’Impero Ottomano al tempo delle guerre zariste. E
che ora possono tornarvi, senza essere mai stati in Russia né
conoscerne la lingua, grazie all’interessamento della Federazione (e
dell’Abkhazia, nel caso degli abkhazi) per i `compatrioti’ che vivono
in Siria.

E qui il viaggio nel passato si fa intricato e la ricostruzione degli
eventi degli ultimi mesi si riempie di ambigue suggestioni.

A febbraio il Consiglio Federale russo ha inviato la prima delegazione
a valutare la condizione dei nord Caucasici in Siria. Sono cominciati
gli arrivi, sia in Abkhazia che in Russia, ma il numero di chi lascia
il paese è limitato, rispetto ai numeri stimati dei `compatrioti’
rimasti in Siria e i quanti avrebbero potuto – comunque –
potenzialmente tutelarsi accettando il passaporto russo.

La Russia ha dichiarato di non voler intervenire a difesa di Assad, e
allo stesso tempo di non poter accettare un intervento militare sul
modello di quello libico. Con la memoria di quanto accaduto in Georgia
nel 2008, quando Mosca giustificò il proprio intervento militare in
Ossezia del Sud facendo riferimento all’obbligo costituzionale di
proteggere compatrioti all’estero, ci si può chiedere se questa `nuova
storica’ minoranza russa ritrovata non possa fornire un pretesto per
contrastare azioni militari in zona.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.balcanicaucaso.org/Tutte-le-notizie/Armeni-e-caucasici-in-partenza-dalla-Siria-121358

ISTANBUL: Renovations on Ýstanbul church to resume

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Aug 17 2012

Renovations on Ýstanbul church to resume

17 August 2012 / SEVGI KORKUT, ISTANBUL

Renovations on a Bulgarian church in Ýstanbul will be resumed once a
new architect is found following the death of the architect who was
leading the initial project.

The architect, Aziz Çakýr, who was among the shareholders of the firm
ART-ÜN, was leading the renovation of Demir Kilise (the Iron Church),
located near the Golden Horn.

Çakýr started the renovation project after winning the tender from the
Ýstanbul Metropolitan Municipality (ÝBB) for the renovation of the
church.

However, he died before completing the renovation and the heirs to
Çakýr’s share in the ART-ÜN firm applied to the municipality to cancel
the contract for the renovation project.

The inheritors explained that they are not architects, and, thus
cannot continue the project.

The ÝBB cancelled the contract and has begun to search for another
company that can continue the renovation.

Demir Kilise was founded when Bulgarian people living under the
Ottomans in Ýstanbul requested a place provided for them to pray
separately from members of Greek Orthodox churches.

The Ottomans allowed the building of a church for the Bulgarians.
Following this approval, a parsonage was constructed on the area where
Demir Kilise stands now.

The parsonage was converted into a wooden church in the following
years. Later, Armenian architect Hovsep Aznavur used an iron framework
for the reconstruction of the church to prevent it from sinking into
the soft ground along the Golden Horn.

The framework of the church was completed in the garden of the firm
which provided the materials for its construction. It was soon brought
to Ýstanbul via Danube River and Black Sea.

From: Baghdasarian