BAKU: Armenians conduct large-scale geological studies in Azerbaijan

APA, Azerbaijan
Dec 15 2012

Armenians conduct large-scale geological studies in Azerbaijan’s
territories occupied by them

[ 15 December 2012 13:14 ]
Baku. Rashad suleymanov – APA. With the view of indentifying natural
resources in 2012, Armenians conducted large-scale geological studies
in Azerbaijan’s territories occupied by them.

APA reports quoting Armenian media that the geological studies have
been conducted in the areas of Aghdara, Kalbajar, Lachin and Zangilan
regions. The results of the geological studies have not been made
public yet.

Armenians conducted geological studies in Azerbaijan’s territories
occupied by them at the request of the `government’ of separatist
regime in Nagorno Karabakh and Armenia’s `Beytz Metal’ company.

From: Baghdasarian

Chess: Grandmaster Aronian to attend World Mind Games in Beijing

Xinhua General News Service, China
December 13, 2012 Thursday 1:18 AM EST

Armenian chess grandmaster Aronian to attend World Mind Games in Beijing

YEREVAN Armenia, Dec. 13

Armenia’s three-time champion of Chess Olympics Levon Aronian will
participate in the Beijing International Chess Tournament to be held
from Dec. 14-19.

The Chess Federation of Armenia said Thursday that according to the
schedule of the World Mind Games, the chess tournament will be in
three formats – rapid, lightening and blitz. The tournament
participant list includes 16 the world’ s strongest grandmasters.

Aronian’s opponents will be Rajabov, Mamediarov (Azerbaijan) Karjakin,
Grishchuk, Morozevich (Russia), Nakamura, Kamsky (USA), Ivanchuk
(Ukraine), Topalov (Bulgaria), Leko (Hungary), Bologan (Moldova),
Jobava (Georgia), Wan Hao, Ding Liren (China) and Giri (the
Netherlands).

Armenia’s top female grandmaster Elina Danielyan will in the women’s
tournament with the same formats, where the world’s 16 best female
grandmasters will be competing.

From: Baghdasarian

Soccer: Movsisyan thanks Valery Karpin for Spartak Moscow challenge

Bettor.com
Dec 15 2012

Movsisyan thanks Valery Karpin for Spartak Moscow challenge

Posted By: Roman Shirokov

Yura Movsisyan has insisted that he is well aware of the tradition and
history of the Russian Premier League giants and has assured the fans
of meeting their expectations

Yura Movsisyan finally completed his controversy-hit move to Spartak
Moscow from Kuban Krasnodar yesterday. The 25-year-old
Armenian-American striker joined the Russian outfit after signing a
reportedly five-year long contract at Luzhniki stadium.

Movsisyan has expressed a sign of relief following his dream-come-true
move to the Moscow-based club and highlighted Valery Karpin as the
main reason why he turned his head to Moscow despite reported
interested from Everton FC and Stoke City respectively.

However, the former Real Salt Lake player refused to comment on his
proposed move to the English Premier League clubs after saying that
there is no point in discussing things that did not happen.

The attacker thanked Karpin, who returned to the coaching role after
Unai Emery’s shocking dismissal, for giving him a chance to represent
a club that have won record nine league titles since the inception of
Russian championship.

`Karpin put a lot of effort because he really wanted to see me at
Moscow. Leonid Fedun also played a vital role in my transfer but as I
said Karpin is the reason why I am here. I am grateful to both of them
as they helped me in completing a dream move,” the Major League Soccer
Cup winner was quoted as saying.

The mercurial forward, who has already scored nine goals this season,
went on to assure the fans of meeting their expectations after saying
that he will do anything in order to help the club in winning medals
and trophies.

`It is a really big club, with the best fans in the world according to
my opinion. They have a glorious history and traditions but the team
have struggled in recent years. Hopefully, I will bring the glory days
back to Moscow,” he concluded.

The fact that most of famous yet experienced foreigners failed to
deliver at Luzhniki after completing a big move to the Moscow-based
club does not seem to bother Movsisyan, who believes that he is ready
for any challenge.

From: Baghdasarian

http://blogs.bettor.com/Movsisyan-thanks-Valery-Karpin-for-Spartak-Moscow-challenge-a208631

Armenia, EU to sign visa facilitation deal

NZ Week, New Zealand
Dec 15 2012

Armenia, EU to sign visa facilitation deal

Souce:Xinhua Publish By Thomas Whittle

YEREVAN, Dec. 14 – Armenia will sign a visa facilitation agreement
with the European Union (EU) next Monday, Armenian Foreign Minister
Edward Nalbandian said Friday.

The deal is expected to make it easier for Armenian youth and cultural
figures to obtain EU entrance visas, Nalbandian told a press
conference.

Huge progress has also been made in negotiations over the Association
Agreement with the EU, he said.

A free trade area is expected to be launched by next November, he added.

Armenia is one of the six countries in the EU’s Eastern Partnership
program initiated in 2009, which was designed to provide a forum for
discussing visa agreements, free trade deals, and strategic
partnership agreements with the EU’s eastern neighbors.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.nzweek.com/world/armenia-eu-to-sign-visa-facilitation-deal-37818/

Armenia will act resolutely if NK security is threatened – Sargsyan

Interfax, Russia
Dec 15 2012

Armenia will act resolutely if Nagorno-Karabakh’s security is
threatened – Sargsyan

YEREVAN. Dec 15

Armenia favors a peaceful settlement of the conflict over
Nagorno-Karabakh but will act resolutely if its security is
threatened, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan said.

“The problem of Karabakh should be resolved in an exclusively peaceful
way through negotiations. However, we are prepared to give a resolute
response to any threats to our security,” Sargsyan said on the 14th
extraordinary congress of the Republican Party, which he leads.

“Considering Azerbaijan’s destructive policy and the threat of the use
of force, guarantees of the Nagorno-Karabakh people’s security will be
increased in any possible way,” he said.

“The negotiations will be continued, but Azerbaijan’s refusal to
withdraw snipers from the contact line and to set up mechanisms to
investigate border incidents and its encouragement of xenophobia and
racism are not promoting confidence building measures and are heating
the situation in the entire region,” Sargsyan said.

Nagorno-Karabakh should be an equitable party in negotiations with
Azerbaijan, he said.

“The arrangement of efficient negotiations in a constructive
atmosphere will be possible if the conflicting parties ensure non-use
of force through international guarantees,” Sargsyan said.

Nagorno-Karabakh is a part of Europe, Sargsyan said. “We will make
more efforts to bolster Nagorno-Karabakh’s contacts with the
international community. We will combine our efforts to contribute to
the establishment and development of an independent and democratic
Nagorno-Karabakh,” he said.

va

From: Baghdasarian

NATO Sec Gen offers Russia agreement on mutual non-aggression guaran

NATO Secretary General offers Russia agreement on mutual
non-aggression guarantees

December 15, 2012 | 20:21

The NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen believes Russia’s
demands unreal to present legal guarantees not targeted against its
EuroMD. Instead, Rasmussen offers Russia to adopt a political document
on mutual non-aggression guarantees.

In an interview to the Interfax he said that the political document,
by which the governments of 29 countries, including the NATO states
and Russia, confirm the non-aggression guarantees against each other,
is in power as any other legal document.

The NATO Secretary General emphasized that it is unreal to receive a
legal document, which could have ratified by the 29 countries.

He also added that the missile threat is quite real, and it does
require a real protection. Hence, it is decided to build a missile
defense system. At the same time, NATO invites Russia to cooperate, as
Russian and NATO systems could have cooperated.

From: Baghdasarian

http://news.am/eng/news/132674.html

Ruling party MP does not see equal contender to their nominee

Ruling party MP does not see equal contender to their nominee

19:50 – 15.12.12

Republican party MP Karen Karapetyan does not see equal contender to
Armenia’s President Serzh Sargsyan. `I do not see a person with the
same diameter as our candidate,’ the MP said before the 14 congress of
the ruling Republican party of Armenia.

He said that not having a contender may have a negative impact though.
`In respect of competition it would have been better for us to have
strong, alternative candidate, It would have reinforced our team more,
making it more mobile and resolute. Naturally in such conditions the
political process loses its logic. I would like to witness not tough
but strong fight,’ the MP said, noting that the processes will show
whether such candidate will be or not.

Karapetyan said he does not think that Prosperous Armenia party leader
Gagik Tsarukyan would have been a serious contender if nominated. He
said Tsarukyan has never stated that he is a candidate. `He has never
stated so, it is just intrigues. Our personal relations are quite good
ones, we are in-laws,’ he said.

The MP also excluded the possibility of Robert Kocharyan’s nomination.
`I also exclude Robert Kocharyan’s nomination as I cannot imagine two
friends, two partners nominate. They have real opportunity to seat
together and reach agreement,’ he said.

Nomination of any candidate by the Armenian National Congress will not
change anything, Karapetyan said. `You will see our candidate will not
poll less than 60%,’ he said.

The MP also did not tie the high emigration rate with the bad policy
conducted by Serzh Sargsyan. He said the main issue is the global
crisis. `Of course we have flaws, issues in the management system and
each of us including the president voice them. But the roots of it go
deep into the developments ongoing in the world. It is the objective
reason, the subjective one is the management, and each of us has its
share of guilt in it. We must forget about our pockets and work for
the sake of our own people,’ he said.

From: Baghdasarian

http://tert.am/en/news/2012/12/15/karen-karapetyan-3/

Aznavour: Any Armenian should remember his roots wherever he is

Aznavour: Any Armenian should remember his roots wherever he is

ARMINFO
Saturday, December 15, 17:19

Any Armenian should remember his/her roots wherever he/she is, and
respect the traditions and culture of the country he/she lives in,
Charles Aznavour, Armenian Ambassador Extraordinary and
Plenipotentiary to Switzerland, the great French singer of Armenian
origin, said in Beijing on Dec 13, during a meeting with the Armenian
community in China.

ArmInfo’s string correspondent in Beijing reportS that during the
meeting Aznavour pointed out that he is going to reach the age of 120.
He also said that he might organize concerts in Beijing and Shanghai
in 2013. Aznavour stressed that he does not consider himself a French
Armenian, but a Frenchman of Armenian origin.

The key goal of Aznavour’s visit to China was to participate in the
Francophonie Days in Beijing.

Armenian Grand Master Levon Aronyan, who has recently gained another
victory in a chess tournament, was also present at the meeting in
Beijing.

From: Baghdasarian

Akcam: Turkey and the Armenian Ghost

Akcam: Turkey and the Armenian Ghost
Posted by Taner Akcam

December 15, 2012

The Armenian Weekly publishes the full text of a talk delivered by Dr.
Taner Akcam (Clark University) during a panel on `Overcoming Genocide
Denial’ organized by Fordham Law School’s Leitner Center for
International Law and Justice on Dec. 4. Speakers included Akcam,
Gregory Stanton (George Mason University), and Sheri Rosenberg
(Cardozo Law School).

Empty chairs in Mush (Photo by Khatchig Mouradian)
`Why do we Turks continue to deny the genocide?’

Or, stated another way, Why do we Turks feel like lightening has
struck our bones whenever the topic is brought up?

I’ve been dedicated to researching the subject of the Armenian
Genocide since 1990, more than 20 years. This question keeps getting
asked over and over again with unerring consistency. The question is a
simple one, but as the years have passed my response to it has
changed. At first, I tried to explain the denial through the concept
of `continuity,’ namely, governmental continuity from the Ottoman
Empire through the Turkish Republic. Another way of formulating this
thesis might be by titling it, `The Dilemma of Making Heroes into
Villains.’ The argument is very simple: The Turkish Republic was
actually established by the Union and Progress Party (Ittihat ve
Terakki), the architects of the Armenian Genocide of 1915. The
founding cadres of Turkey were essentially Union and Progress members.
And so, a significant number of the founding cadres of Turkey were
either directly involved in the Armenian Genocide or they enriched
themselves by looting Armenian properties. But these individuals were
also our national heroes – they are the founding fathers of our nation.
If Turkey acknowledges the genocide, we would have to accept that a
number of our national heroes and founding fathers were either
murderers, thieves, or both. This is the real dilemma.

Those individuals, as we were taught in school, were men who `created
our nation and the state out of nothing.’ They define who we are. This
is true not only for the early generation of the Turkish nation, but
also for the opposition movements of the country, including the
largest wave of a democratic-progressive movement Turkey had ever
seen: the 1968 student protest movement. The representatives of this
wave and its political organizations strongly identified themselves
with the founding cadres of the republic. They called themselves, in
analogy with the founding fathers, the second `Kuvayi-Milliyeciler’ or
`national front,’ a specific term that we use only to define our
founding cadres. This strong identification with the founding fathers
was not particular to the progressive `68 generation. It has been true
for any of the groups active in Turkey: nationalist, Islamicist, or
other right wing circles.

In other words, in order to accept the genocide, in our present state,
we would have to deny our own national identity, as it exists today.
That is a very difficult task, an almost impossible one, and very
destructive. Instead of dealing with the identity crisis and the
emotional and political fallout that will result from accepting the
genocide, think about it: Wouldn’t it be so much simpler to just deny
it?

I started to modify my response to the question `Why do Turks deny the
genocide?’ over time. I added one more reason for Turkish denial. It
is also a very simple argument. If Turkey accepts that the genocide
took place, it will be obligated to pay reparations. The argument has
some wider consequences than whether the events of 1915 should be
termed `genocide.’ Let’s assume that 1915 was not genocide, and
imagine that the Union and Progress Party had deported the Armenians
from a cold, mountainous, and infertile area to a sunny warm and
fertile region; pretend, in other words, that the Armenians had been
dispatched to Florida. However, everything that these people owned was
confiscated in the process and not a single penny was paid back to
them. Even if you refuse to accept the events of 1915 as genocide, you
have to accept the fact that the country of Turkey today was formed on
the seizure of Armenian assets, and now sits on top of that wealth. As
a result, if you accept and acknowledge that something unjust happened
in 1915 in Turkey, you have to pay back compensation. Therefore, in
order to avoid doing that, denying genocide outright makes a whole lot
of sense.

I have continued to add some additional factors to explain Turkish
denials, such as the phenomenon that occurs when you repeat a lie.
Even in ordinary daily life, how easy is it to reverse yourself once
you’ve told a lie? The lie about genocide has a history of decades and
has become calcified. A state that’s been lying for 90 years can’t
simply reverse course. Even when you know you’re telling untruths,
they acquire the veneer of reality after so many years.

But these points are only useful for explaining why the state has
continued to deny the genocide. As the years passed, I started to
write that the term `Turkish denial’ was inadequate for fully
explaining the situation. I questioned the validity of the use of the
term `Turks’ to reflect a homogeneous entity that defines not only the
people of Turkey but the state of Turkey, as well. I suggested making
a distinction between state policy and the attitude of the people of
Turkey towards genocide. I argued that the term `denial’ was adequate
in explaining state policy, but not that of society. The attitude of
society should more accurately be portrayed as one of ignorance,
apathy, fatalism, reticence, and silence, rather than denial.

Turkish society is not a monolithic block, and can be considered
analogous to a train. It’s made up of lots of different cars, and each
car represents a different sub-cultural ethnicity with a different
attitude towards what happened in 1915. I’ve stated many times that a
large portion of Kurds, Dersimians, and Alewites have accepted the
reality of what happened in 1915, and that the real problem is that
these different groups have not been able to express their thoughts on
it in a way that was forceful, firm, and especially written. I used
the terms silence and avoidance not only in the sense of a single
attitude that is jointly held by all segments of society, but also to
mean not openly taking a stance toward the official state narrative.
One has to accept that all of these distinctions are important, and
perhaps vital, to understanding the development of civil society in
Turkey today, but that they are still not enough to explain why
denialism is such a dominant part of the cultural landscape in Turkey.

So, my thinking has begun to change, yet again, recently. I don’t mean
to say that my previous explanations were necessarily incorrect. Just
the opposite: I still believe that these factors play a major role in
the denial of the Armenian Genocide. However, I have now started to
think that the matter seems to have roots in something much deeper and
almost existentialist, which covers the state as much as the society.
The answer to the question seems to lie in a duality between existence
and non-existence – or, as Hamlet would say, `to be or not to be.’ I
believe our existence as a state and a society translates into
their – Christians in Anatolia – non-existence, or not-being. To accept
what happened in 1915 means you have to accept the existence of
them – Christians – on Turkish territory, which is practically like
announcing our non-existence, because we owe our being to their
non-existence. Let me explain.

In order to provide more clarity, I would like to introduce Habermas
to the topic. Habermas points out that within the social tissue and
institutions of societies resides a `secret violence,’ and this
`secret violence’ creates a structure of communication that the entire
society identifies with.[1] Through this way of `collective
communication,’ the restrictions and exclusion of certain topics from
public discourse are effectively institutionalized and legitimized.
What is meaningful to note here is that this structure is not imposed
on the society by the rulers, but is accepted and internalized by
those who are ruled. There is a silent consensus in the society.

I would like to borrow another term from author Elias Siberski to shed
some light on this condition-`communicative reality’ (die
kommunikative Wirklichkeit). Siberski uses this term to describe a
very important characteristic of secretive organizations.2 According
to Siberski, secretive organizations create an internal reality
through a method of communication that is totally different from the
real world. The situation in Turkey today resembles this very closely.
As a society, we are like a secret organization. Since the
establishment of our republic we have created a `communicative
reality,’ which sets out our way of thinking and existence over `state
and nation.’ It gives shape to our emotions and defining belief
systems, or, in other words, our entire social-cultural net of
relations. In sum, the things that make us who we are or at a minimum
who we think we are. What is important to note is the gap between this
`communicative reality’ and actual reality.

In the end, this `communicative reality’ has given us speakable and
unspeakable worlds, and has created a collective secret that covers
our entire society like a glove. It has created one big gigantic black
hole. We are, today, a reality that possesses a `black hole.’ This
existence of a huge `black hole,’ or the possession of a `collective
secret,’ or creation of a `coalition of silence’ – these are the terms
that define who we are… We simply eradicated everything Christian from
this reality. This is how we teach Ottoman history in our schools,
this is how we produce intellectual-cultural works about our society.

My opinion is that the secret behind the denial of the Armenian
Genocide, or the unspeakableness of it, lies somewhere in here. What
happened in 1915 is Turkish society’s collective secret, and genocide
has been relegated to the `black hole’ of our societal memory. Since
the founding of the Republic of Turkey, all of us, rightists and
leftists, Muslim, Alewite, Kurds, and Turks, have created a collective
`coalition of silence’ around this subject, and we don’t like being
reminded of this hidden secret that wraps around us like a warm, fuzzy
blanket. The reminders have an annoying irritating quality and we feel
confronted by a situation that leaves us unsure of what to do or say.

Because, if we are forced to confront our history, everything – our
social institutions, mentalities, belief systems, culture, and even
the language we use – will be open to question. The way a society
perceives itself is going to be questioned from top to bottom. As a
result, we don’t appreciate the `reminders.’ We view reminders as
`force,’ and react quite negatively to them. All of us, rightist and
leftist, search for excuses, but we together seem to be crying out, as
if in chorus, `Here we are minding our own business, not bothering
anyone, when you appeared out of nowhere. Where did you come from?’ It
is as if we, as a nation, are making this collective statement: `If
you think we are going to destroy the social-cultural reality we
created with such great care over 95 years, with one swipe of a pen,
think again!’

The Armenian Genocide is a part of a more general framework that is
directly related to our existence. The republic and the society of
Turkey today have been constructed upon the removal of Christians – the
destruction of an existence on a territory that we call our homeland.
Since we have established our existence upon the non-existence of
another, every mention of that existence imparts fear and anxiety in
us. The difficulty we have in our country with speaking about the
Armenian issue lies within this existence-non-existence duality. If
you’re looking for an example that comes close to this, you don’t need
to look far: The history of the Native Americans in the U.S. bears
similarities.

So, I think we have to reverse the question: The central question is
not why Turkey denies the genocide, but whether we the people of
Turkey are ready, as a state and as a society, to deny our present
state of existence. It seems that the only way we can do that is by
repudiating how we came to be and by creating a new history of how we
came to exist. Are we capable of doing that? That’s the true question.

Notes

[1] Jurgen Habermas, `Die Ütopie des guten Herrschers,’ in: Habermas,
Kultur and Kritik (Frankfurt a.M., 1973), p. 386-7.

2 Elias Siberski, Untergrund und Offene Geselschaft, Zur Fragen der
strukturellen Deutung des sozialen Phaenomens (Stutgart, 1967), p. 51.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2012/12/15/akcam-turkey-and-the-armenian-ghost/

Sarsgayn’s speech at the 14th extraordinary Convention of the RPA

President Serzh Sarsgayn’s speech at the 14th extraordinary Convention
of the Republican Party

16:58 15.12.2012

Today, the President of the Republic of Armenia, Chairman of the
Republican Party of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan participated at the 14th
extraordinary Convention of the RPA. The agenda of the Convention
included the presidential nomination issue and Serzh Sargsyan was
nominated as a presidential candidate. At the Convention Serzh
Sargsyan made a statement.

Statement by the President of Armenia, Chairman of the Republican
Party of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan at the RPA 14th Convention

Fellow Republicans,

Distinguished Guests,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

I welcome you all at the extraordinary Convention of the Republican
Party of Armenia. Today, we have the opportunity, before the
Presidential elections, to assess the current situation, evaluate the
efficiency of steps already taken and to chart our mid-term and
long-term objectives. Let us try to recap what has already been done,
understand where we stand now, and where we are headed.

Two decades ago, our nation received yet another chance to create its
own independent statehood. And, thanks God, we did not miss it. In the
first five years of independence our people endured immense hardship.
Our people came out victorious in a war imposed upon them. Laid the
foundations of a liberal economy on the ruins of collapsing economy.
Created public administration structure characteristic of an
independent state, and created the army. Often, encircled from many
sides, sometimes entirely cut off from the world, within closed
borders, it was able to move ahead by the intellect and vigor of its
offspring: we have reaffirmed to ourselves and the world our ability
to live independently. Our people have proven our right for existence
in the 21st century; our right to have a state, our right to have a
future. The first years of independence were the years of sweat and
struggle, years of formation and creation. Through these very years
the Armenian nation shaped the main rationale of our life and work for
the decades to come: everything that is good and virtuous,
controversial and contentious, leaning on the spiritual, intellectual
and material values accumulated through preceding decades. We shaped
it the way we could: as we desired, occasionally as we were compelled
to.

In the following decades, our soldiers, workers, farmers,
intellectuals and authorities have been able to solidify these
achievements. Our people were able to preserve the achievements, make
the Army and the state structures even stronger. We were able to
create a stable financial system. Thanks to the unprecedented in our
reality tempo of economic growth, we created the material
prerequisites for development. Structures inherited from the Soviet
era and created during the first years of independence were improved
and modernized. The country undertook structural changes in the most
vital areas of education and health care. The time was not simply
favorable, it compelled and commanded these changes, it forced and
induced to preserve and strengthen them.

Almost five years ago a new opportunity emerged for our state, for our
people. Time offered a new starting point to our people. An
opportunity and an imperative to make the structures formed in the
preceding fifteen years deliver their best for the benefit of the
people. As it often happens in history, this time too, the opportunity
was accompanied, or rather was imposed upon us by demanding
challenges. Our society shuddered from the outburst of social and
political intolerance accumulated over years. Another war, which
erupted in our neighborhood, shut down our borders. For a moment, the
Armenian economy sagged under the impact of the financial and economic
crisis. The problems and painful issues that had been set aside for
almost fifteen years, piled up and demanded immediate resolution. The
people, more than ever, were waiting to make the best of the benefits
accumulated during the years-long period of favorable environment.
Young people were demanding better housing and a better education,
government employees – a dignified life. Citizens were demanding
higher quality public services. Businesses were demanding a more
predictable economic climate and less administration. The unemployed
were demanding jobs. The workers were demanding confidence in the
future. The insecure were demanding opportunities. The affluent were
demanding dependability. And everyone was demanding justice and
security.

To ignore the imperative of the time, fail to fulfill its demands was
not an option. Nobody perceives this momentous truth with greater
precision, than the political force which, through public trust, has
voluntarily assumed the burden of governance: the Party, the
Personality. And, together with you, we have been able to hear the
call of the time.

We were able to bring the country out of the financial and economic
crisis. We were able to ease the tax burden for small and medium
enterprises. Were able to save thousands of jobs in the mining and
construction sectors; provide a serious impetus to the creation of new
jobs in food production and light industry; were able to keep our
financial system intact; were able to do things that even much more
powerful countries failed to accomplish.

Still during the crisis, we were able to contain the spike in energy,
gas and water tariffs. We have built hundreds of kilometers of water
and gas pipes, renovated rural roads and initiated the construction of
an unprecedented highway infrastructure. We were able to take
communication and information technologies to most remote corners of
our country.

We gave the opportunity to hundreds of young families to buy homes and
provided thousands of people in the earthquake zone with new housing.
Thanks to the introduction of new systems of insurance, we were able
to improve the well-being of government employees; were able to
considerably improve the quality of public services for our citizens.
The once problematic services today are comparable in their quality
and administration to those in the most developed and civilized
states. We have also been able to considerably advance the protection
of the rights of the Armenian consumers. And, at last, it became
possible to make maternity ward services free of charge, while medical
care in general became more affordable. We brought modern,
high-quality medical service to the marzes of Armenia; created
guarantees for a dignified old age for working citizens through the
introduction of a new funded pension system.

Rest assured that for our compatriots, who had left Armenia only years
ago, Armenia has changed beyond recognition.

We have started, step by step, to marginalize the corruption and abuse
that were getting rooted in our country for decades. We encouraged and
promoted young and well-educated politicians and statesmen. We
launched and brought to completion a number of critical official
investigations. We put forth our collective will against connivance.
We rejected outright a malicious practice of using force against
journalists, opened up the media and restored the right of TV channels
to access the spectrum. We dumped public communication from the
position of strength and restored the right of people to be in
opposition without labeling them traitors. We did not shy away from
difficulty. We have commenced reforms in the most complex and
important areas, starting with the Police and the judiciary. We
demanded that our Police serve the people in a new way,
conscientiously.

I assure you that the new generation of Armenian citizens will learn
about impunity only from their parent’s memories.

Through the previous five years, together with you, we have been able
to noticeably change our country. However, it is not enough, not
enough at all. We have been able to make Armenia incomparably more
attractive for businesses and a more dependable country for
investments. However, there is much left to be done. We have been able
to make Armenia a much more comfortable and safe country. Still much
more will be done. Some of the problems have been fundamentally
solved. The necessary steps have been taken or the solution of others.
It will not take long for our citizens to see the results. We have set
difficult targets. But we have chosen targets that will continue to
make life in our country more prosperous and safer. Our society will
become more equitable, and our state – more secure. All our steps are
directed towards people, towards the citizens of Armenia. All our
efforts are for the people, our compatriots, their well-being. We have
never followed parochial partisan objectives. We take pride in finding
solutions for exceptionally tough problems, and the achieved results.
But each and every of these results requires a dozen, sometimes a
hundred steps, steps which cannot be taken concurrently, because these
steps must be taken also by others. These are steps which are
commanded by the time. Very often, in solving intricate issues, you
have to wait for your partners to make their move. Often you wait for
each of them to make a step. However, as a rule, the results of such
partnership are more tangible, durable and lasting. Many of our
initiatives today have already yielded results. Nevertheless, we have
launched many more initiatives, whose results will be observable for
our citizens in the forthcoming years. Today, I would like to
highlight our determination and will to bring them to a successful
completion.

Dear Fellow Republicans,

We need to have a sound and forward-looking objective, which will
allow to concur present challenges and move forward, ensuring a
dignified and prosperous life for every citizen of the Republic of
Armenia. Such an objective solidifies our conviction that our country
will be competitive, endowed with an Armenia-oriented centripetal
force. Together, we will be able to shape a country, which will be
competitive enough to offer sufficient prosperity to its own citizens,
will devoid of any sense a desire to earn a living abroad and will be
able in a dignified manner to summon its children back – to return to
a thriving Armenia. We are united by the idea that Armenia will be a
much better place, far more equitable, freer, and much more
prosperous. We have no alternative; we just have to build such an
Armenia.

Today we have a mature battleworthy Army, which safeguards the
security of our Motherland; we have established state and local
governance institutions, a burgeoning civil society, and press which
is freer than the press in many countries, including some developed
ones of traditional democracy. The Armenian family, which went through
the crucible of millennia, is our greatest value. A protected homeland
and well-off families – these are the prerequisites of a
well-organized state, and they will fulfill the objective of secure
Armenia.

We are living in a region entangled in a web of consistent hatred and
warmongering rhetoric, a region full of threats and hazards. Some
countries even question the right of the Armenian people to live on
their historical land. The probabilities of military conflicts in our
region are rampant. Stopping the arms race and lifting the blockade
remain high on our political agenda. Dividing lines, xenophobia and
the inclination of some of our neighbors to solve issues through force
or threats thereof will continue to be rejected. Implementation of
regional programs while isolating Armenia is not viable and will
hinder regional stability, security and development processes. We will
continue our substantial contribution to the process of establishing
an atmosphere of mutual trust in our region. No nation is perceived by
the Armenian people as enemies. In the same spirit, the Armenian
people anticipate that the authorities of neighboring states will stop
their policy of denying Armenians the right of existence, sovereignty,
stable and secure development, meanwhile pushing their own societies
towards violence. At the same time, we are confident that the first
and foremost guarantor of a secure Motherland is our Army. Maintaining
peace in the region and thwarting military recklessness against our
country depend on a precise and purposeful development of our defense
potential, in accordance with modern standards of professionalism,
discipline, transparency, and control.

Persistence in the reformation of internal security structures and
assuring their compliance with modern requirements, prevention of
external threats, as well as steps to ensure an adequate response will
span comprehensive – intelligence, political, diplomatic, economic,
information, if necessary, military and other measures.

The Armed Forces of Armenia will not engage in exhausting and passive
defense, because they are capable, through their mobility and combat
readiness, to extend security in the region and beyond, and the basis
for that is already set by the excellent execution of combat tasks by
our peacekeepers in different corners of the world.

The Armed Forces of the Republic of Armenia will continue to be
supplied with modern weaponry and materiel, including that of domestic
production. Priority will be assigned to multifunctional complexes
combining observation, detection, targeting and destruction systems.
In all this, the domestic military and industrial complex will play a
crucial role, and its continual modernization will remain in the focus
of the state’s attention.

Hazing and intimidation of fellow servicemen have no place in the
Armenian Armed Forces. The Army personnel will become most educated
and professional. Discipline will be based on mutual respect of
servicemen and unconditional performance of orders with utmost sense
of contributing to the defense of the Motherland. In all this, the
commanders will serve as ultimate role models, who will lead by their
personal example.

In building a secure Homeland, the role of foreign policy becomes ever
more prominent. Today, the international involvement of Armenia is
more inclusive, dynamic and interrelated than ever. Our bilateral and
multilateral cooperation is expanding. The process of deepening
diplomatic relations is going on. The legal framework of our
international activities is becoming more comprehensive. Armenia is
developing relations with almost all leading states, power centers,
and regions. There emerge more and more favorable conditions for
presenting the interests of our country, for the protection of the
rights of our citizens, and for the involvement of our compatriots.

Our permanent attention will be focused on:

– Strengthening the external elements of security;
– A peaceful resolution of the Artsakh problem, based on the right of
people for self-determination;
– Expansion of Armenia’s participation in the international political
and economic cooperation and structures;
– Pursuing pan-Armenian agenda and adding daily momentum to the
process of international recognition of the Armenian Genocide;
– Steps towards the preservation of Armenian cultural heritage;
– Development of partnership with the Russian Federation and
implementation of programs to strengthen strategic cooperation;
– Development and expansion of friendly partnership with the United States;
– Continual policy of approximation with Europe, further strengthening
of our relations with European countries;
– Other priorities of our foreign policy.

We will continue to promote and contribute to the implementation of
all initiatives aiming at the formation of a positive agenda of
international relations, which is concurrent with out national
interests. We will remain faithful to the adopted spirit of the
partnership and cooperation. For the world, Armenia will remain a
trustworthy and predictable partner.

2015 will be a singular milestone for the entire Armenian nation, the
year of the recognition and condemnation of the Armenian Genocide – in
Armenia, Artsakh, the Diaspora, as well as for the progressive
mankind. We will put our efforts into bringing the recognition and
condemnation of the Armenian Genocide to a dramatically new level –
the level of international structures, states, international
community, including the Turkish society.

Another essential element of secure Motherland is the peaceful
resolution of the Artsakh problem. This in non-negotiable: the destiny
of Nagorno Karabakh will be decided solely by the people of Artsakh.
The Nagorno Karabakh problem must be solved exclusively through
peaceful means, through negotiations. At the same time, we are ready
for a staunch putdown of any reckless scheme or encroachment, which
may endanger our security.

Considering Azerbaijan’s destructive policy, persistent propagation of
hatred towards Armenians, daily threats to use force, we will continue
through all possible means to enhance security guarantees for Nagorno
Karabakh and its population. We will carry on with the process of
negotiations. Expressing our gratitude to the Co-Chair states of the
Minsk Group for their efforts towards the peaceful resolution of the
conflict, we will at the same time continue to draw the attention of
mediators and the international community to opportunities for the
establishment and strengthening of confidence building measures, which
could be helpful towards a peaceful resolution. Azerbaijan’s policy in
general and, particularly, their refusal to withdraw snipers, refusal
to put info force a mechanism for investigation of border incidents,
the glorification of a murderer, inducement of xenophobia and racism,
unreliable and hypocritical stance during negotiations are not
conducive to the establishment of confidence building measures and, if
left unchecked, will exacerbate the situation in the entire region. It
would be reasonable and natural if Artsakh came to the table of
negotiations as soon as possible, thus our efforts will be aimed at
the expeditious resolution of that issue. Effective negotiations in a
constructive atmosphere will become possible only when the parties to
the conflict genuinely want to reach a just resolution of this issue,
abandoning baseless maximalist claims.

Dear Colleagues,

Only fair Armenia can be secure. A `fair state’ implies the ability to
discuss with the citizens important issues and adopt fair decisions. A
fair state must guarantee for everyone equal opportunities in
politics, in the economy, and in cultural life; a fair state must
ensure and enhance competition, at the same time protecting the most
vulnerable social groups; a fair state must be able to forestall
corruption efficiently.

Justice is based on the rule of law, on the ideas that recognize a
person as the greatest asset, with everything that follows. Ensuring
justice is the task for all state and local governance bodies;
nevertheless it remains the primary task of the courts.

With this regard, we will continue to carry out fundamental, deep
reforms, which, in a short period of time, will ensure accessible
justice for our citizens, its real independence and efficiency.

We also realize that only free Armenia can be fair Armenia. In our
country, pluralism, political liberties, freedom of speech have no
alternative. This is an important principle, and we still have much to
do to uphold and develop it.

Tolerance is the pillar of the political processes underway in our
country. In the process of solving current issues we must rule out
discrimination, suppression of dissent and other despicable
manifestations. Constructive and responsible criticism is the promise
of a healthy development of the political system. Development of a
multiparty system and constructive dialogue between the political
units are among important elements of a secure Armenia. In previous
years, we have been implementing the policy of building bridges, and
will maintain that principle in our agenda. The principle of national
and social solidarity has no alternative.

Only ideological competition testifies to the maturity of the
political systems of democratic states. We base our work on the
national and democratic values and we also attach importance to stable
relations with our partners in the Diaspora and its traditional
political parties, which aim at the strengthening of Armenia-Diaspora
political ties and the creation of favorable conditions for reaching
the Secure Armenia objective.

A stable and sound political system also implies assistance to the
creation and development of civil society institutions. We are
determined to get to the point when every citizen of Armenia is
confident that his or her voice is heard, his or her criticism
receives proper attention and is treated with respect. The mature
state of civil society in our country is a fact. Non-formal
associations of citizens for the solution of issues which concern them
has become a factor which influences decisions of the authorities and
serves as a unique balancing mechanism. We will continue to move
forward in this direction.

Notwithstanding all of the above, the well-being of families remains
an essential base of secure Armenia. We have to set serious goals for
our economic, social, cultural, educational, health care, and equal
territorial development policies.

Dear Fellow Republicans,

You have been handed the first draft of our program. We did it so that
with your proposals and observations you make it a comprehensive and
fundamental program. There is still sufficient time so you are
requested to present your considerations to the Party office for
reviewing so that the program is augmented and finalized.

I am grateful to my Party, to you and in your person to all members of
the Party for nominating me for the upcoming Presidential elections.
It is really very important for me. During these years, impressive
steps have been made in a number of directions, which are yet to yield
results and be brought to conclusion. This is very important for
finishing what has been started.

The organization and conduct of good, fair elections is our first and
foremost priority. We have received excellent reactions to our latest
parliamentary elections. It is inspiring. Today, as a state, we are
capable of conducting elections based on free competition, near
absolute freedom of expression and unrestricted expression of will,
and we are determined to move even further in that direction.

It is no secret that we have always been presenting ideas `in favor’,
have never acted against an individual or a force, have been in favor
of discussions and a wider dialogue, and have proposed avenues which
in our opinion lead towards Armenia’s enhanced security, towards
advancement and prosperity for our people. We will stay on that course
in the future as well. By the Lord’s grace and by its tenacity, our
nation has once again acquired its independent statehood and we will
not fall behind the mainstream of the developed world. We have to
ensure this. We must be able to create a secure Motherland for every
citizen of the Republic of Armenia and care for the well-being of each
family. There is no doubt in my mind that we will.

Armenia’s advancement is the only guarantee, which holds the promise
of eternity for our nation, prosperity of our citizens, inviolability
of our borders, our role and place on the international area, and our
national identity.

Each new day in Armenia should be different from the previous, should
be better. We will achieve the Secure Armenia with that very logic – a
better Armenia, prosperous, conducive to living and create in,
powerful and invincible Armenia, based on the concept of thriving
families.

In Secure Armenia, everyone should be able to realize his or her
dreams, reach personal, family and national goals, leaving behind all
negative phenomena such as `privileged’ individuals, monopoly, and
connivance.

A Secure Motherland and thriving families – these are the objectives
of our progress.

Dear Friends,

The Armenian statehood means a free and self-confident citizen.
Degrading human dignity, deprivation of rights and destitution which,
under previous administrations, used to be normal and regular, may not
go on in independent Armenia. A citizen must feel safe and confident
on the streets, in the work place, in a police precinct, and in the
courtroom. A citizen of Armenia must be addressed in capital letters.
This is to be taken in the literal as well as the metaphorical sense.
It is the responsibility of any political force and, moreover, of the
ruling Party, to contribute to the formation of a new Armenian. A new
Armenian, who respects laws and who is confident that he is respected
back.

It has been noted on many occasions that the Armenian Army is our
dignity. That is really so. Today, I am saying even more: the entire
Armenian state structure is our dignity. As a nation, we have things
to tell the world, we have things to prove to ourselves and to the
world. What can we prove to the world by offending and deceiving each
other, by humiliating and undermining each other? There are many good
things going on in Armenia, but very often these things go unnoticed
unfairly, because there are also disgraceful things going on, which
may disillusion even optimists. We have a fight to fight; and it is
our fight.

Remember this: in any fight the one who is not resilient and patient
is the first to give up and become disheartened. No one is allowed to
dishearten citizens of Armenia. Desperation or disappointment of one
single person means defeat in a wider sense. For that very reason,
today, I declare: The entire state system in Armenia must embody
Armenian dignity. Bad workers are those who possess neither human, nor
national dignity, while our hard working officials can serve an
example for foreigners. It is important to present ourselves to the
foreigners in a dignified way; however, before presenting ourselves to
foreigners, we must be able to present ourselves decently to the
citizens of Armenia in a no less dignified manner. There is no issue
that cannot be solved, as long as we are together. Success always
comes when we converge our national efforts. Fast of slowly but it
comes. Our failures start when we lack unity or, to put it bluntly,
when we work against each other – and it doesn’t matter whether it is
done in the open or covertly.

I appeal to all: Let us work and help each other, back each other,
inspire each other with hope and faith. A member of the parliament and
a citizen, the head of a region and a citizen, a policeman and a
citizen, a minister and a citizen ought to work in this manner. In
this case, everyone will enjoy that sense of security.

I would like to reiterate: The one who despairs first, loses the
battle. No one should look for solution to this problem in close or
distant shores. The solution is within us. We must be worthy of the
memory of those who did their work virtuously. For being worthy of our
greats, one doesn’t need to be a hero; one simply has to do his work
diligently. Rest assured that this way you will be making Armenia one
of the safest countries in the world. All political and civil forces
in Armenia and in the Diaspora, and the Republican Party of Armenia in
particular today, along with other tasks, have a mission – to reach
agreement within themselves and with each other on issues of democracy
in Armenia, the rule of law and all other related issues. These issues
are part and parcel of the security of Armenian citizens.

Struggle for power is a natural phenomenon; however, no matter who is
in power, the leader will face the same problems, which are the
problems of Armenia and the entire Armenian nation. No matter who is
in power, the leader will need agreement and broad public support to
work more efficiently. Public accord is a force which can ensure
incredible results for any good initiative. At the same time, that
very force will always stop the ignorant and reckless, preventing them
from conducting unjustified experiments in our country.

Dear Colleagues,

There is no doubt in my mind that we will win and will see the Armenia
of our dreams – strong, prosperous, and secure. And it will be
achieved not only because of some favorable external conditions. We
will accomplish it ourselves, at our own expense. The intellectual and
moral charge of the Armenian nation is not in the least exhausted. On
the contrary, we have powerful sources to recharge from – in our near
and distant past, as well as here and now.

When Leonid Azgaldian articulated his famous maxim, he meant not only
Artsakh – he meant Armenia and the entire Armenian nation – This Is
Armenia, period.

This is Armenia where we are raising a new generation. This generation
will be stronger than us – mentally, physically and morally. No one is
allowed to shut up young people and stop them from taking to the
skies. They have serious things to do and will do it, but not before
they realize the most important thing – this is Armenia, period.

This is Armenia where we have formed a powerful army which is not to
be fooled around with. The Army is our iron anchor of safety,
security, and eternity. This is the Armenia which those with unclouded
reason are wary of. In the middle of the night, the posture of a young
soldier standing in the mountain snow is telling everyone, this is
Armenia, period. No one is allowed to disjoint Armenia behind his
back! I have said this on many occasions, and will repeat for those
who do not get it – no one is allowed. Patience, indulgence and
tolerance have their limits. And we have set that limits precisely:
these limits are the limits of Armenian law.

Let us not forget: This is the Armenia which is watched by millions of
Armenians living abroad. They watch us with hope, desire and
anticipation of positive changes. Sometimes, we are watched through a
magnifying glass; they rejoice and despair with us, and they are
right. The power of the Motherland is a great power. Let me give you
one example: Once a French Armenian told me that in his workplace he
never had the opportunity to tell his co-workers about his Armenian
origins. But several days after the liberation of Shushi, he could not
resist the temptation. He began speaking about his being an Armenian
proudly and loudly. Our success can bring back even those who are
headed towards assimilation. Only one thing is needed -people should
not be embarrassed but proud of Armenia’s image, and that image is
shaped by us. Whether French or Syrian Armenians – they all comprehend
alongside all its problems this is Armenia, and that says it all.

Yes, there are many problems, but there also exists a power to solve
those problems – our people, the masters and guardians of Armenia, of
Armenia which today is embarking upon a new historic era. This new
will era must not inevitably come through revolutions or wars. The
experience of successful countries proves that achievement acquired
without effort may be lost as casually. Only that which is created
through peaceful and effective work shall be enduring. We have taken
that unwavering course: that is exactly what we are doing.

I say: we will persistently cast aside everything that is bad and
wrong in our work and in our daily life. Towards that end, we have
already taken numerous steps, which are yet to yield results. The
endgame starts now, the winning endgame.

This is new Armenia, period.
This is Armenia of the freedom of speech and democracy, period.
This is Armenia of the rule of law and respect for rights, period.
This is Armenia of economic freedom and competition, period.
This is Armenia responsible for all nations, all citizens living here, period.
This is Armenia that respects all of its international commitments, period.
This is Armenia that remembers its past, draws powerful charges from
it, but also Armenia that jettisons old debris and creates a new
history, period.

Long live Armenia!
Forward, towards secure Armenia!

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.armradio.am/en/2012/12/15/president-serzh-sarsgayns-speech-at-the-14th-extraordinary-convention-of-the-republican-party/