Yerevan Protesters Demand A Proper Attitude To Armenian Citizens

YEREVAN PROTESTERS DEMAND A PROPER ATTITUDE TO ARMENIAN CITIZENS

17:03 16/07/2013 ” SOCIETY

A protest is taking place near the building of Russia’s Embassy in
Yerevan. The protesters condemn the inhumane attitude towards Armenian
citizen Hrachya Harutyunyan arrested in Russia.

The protest began at 15:00 local time, our correspondent says.

The protesters are holding placards reading “We demand a proper
attitude to Armenian citizens.”

To note, a truck crashed into a passenger bus on July 13 in Podolsk,
Russia. The truck driver appeared to be an Armenian by the name of
Hrachya Harutyunyan. The bus split in two. 18 people were killed,
30 were hospitalized with injuries. Harutyunyan was arrested on Monday.

He was brought to the courtroom wearing a women’s robe.

Source: Panorama.am

From: Baghdasarian

Investigative Journalists NGO To Organize Reporter Tours To Artsakh

INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISTS NGO TO ORGANIZE REPORTER TOURS TO ARTSAKH FRONTLINE

13:24, July 16, 2013

The Investigative Journalists NGO has reached an agreement with the
Artsakh Ministry of Defense to organize periodic visits of journalists
to various military bases and the frontline.

Transportation costs will be covered by the IJ NGO and the ministry
will offer financial assistance to journalists during their stay
in Artsakh.

Those media outlets wishing to send reporters for on the next tour
are asked to submit their names to the IJ NGO by 11am, July 17.

The next tour will take place on July 24-25.

Please submit names to [email protected] (Tel: 563363, 580219).

From: Baghdasarian

http://hetq.am/eng/news/28138/investigative-journalists-ngo-to-organize-reporter-tours-to-artsakh-frontline.html

Armenian And Iranian Businessmen Ready To Expand Cooperation In A Nu

ARMENIAN AND IRANIAN BUSINESSMEN READY TO EXPAND COOPERATION IN A NUMBER OF SPHERES

YEREVAN, July 16./ARKA/. Iranian businessmen discussed with their
Armenian counterparts the perspectives for further development of
bilateral commercial and economic ties at business forum in Yerevan
on Tuesday.

Yahya Ale-Eshaq, Chairman of Tehran Chamber of Commerce, noted,
“our cooperation with Armenia is on a quite high level, but there
are administrative issues which should be regulated. Particularly,
it refers to establishing mutually beneficial tariffs, facilitation
of free movement of businessmen.”

He also said Armenian and Iranian businessmen don’t know each other
pretty well, and the visit of the Iranian delegation made up of 60
businessmen proves the willingness and readiness of the Iranian side
to cooperate.

The Iranian delegates came from different spheres: oil and
petrochemicals, agriculture and food, etc.

“Iranian-Armenian trade turnover has valued at nearly 320 million
dollars over the recent two years, but we need to increase this figure
given the potential we have,” Deputy Economy Minister of Armenia Ara
Petrosyan underscored.

He added the two countries have a high-level political dialogue.

The Iranian delegates are also expected to meet with the interested
ministries and structures of Armenia.

Armenian-Iranian trade turnover valued at $317.7 million in 2012,
according to the National Statistical Service. Armenian export hit
$97.8 million.

Armenia mainly exports to Iran ore fuel, oil products, bitumen, wax,
plastics and plastic products, ferrous metals, nuclear reactors,
boilers, equipment and mechanical details, aluminum and products made
from it.

Iran mainly exports to Armenia ore fuel, oil and oil products,
bitumen, wax, plastics and plastic products, inorganic chemicals,
radioactive isotopes, fertilizers, salt, sulfur, soil and stones,
jointing materials, limestone and cement. -0- – See more at:

From: Baghdasarian

http://arka.am/en/news/economy/armenian_and_iranian_businessmen_ready_to_expand_cooperation_in_a_number_of_spheres_/#sthash.1bhEvG6y.dpuf

David Babayan: International Community Realizes That Settlement Is I

DAVID BABAYAN: INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY REALIZES THAT SETTLEMENT IS IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT KARABAKH’S INVOLVEMENT

14:14 16/07/2013 ” REGION

Panorama.am talked to Artsakh President’s spokesman David Babayan
asking to comment on results of the latest meeting between the Artsakh
leader and the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office and the current developments
in the settlement of the Karabakh conflict.

“Meetings in such format are important in themselves. The meeting
showed that the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office is interested in peaceful
settlement of the conflict, which is of course praiseworthy,” Babayan
told our correspondent.

“Although Artsakh is not involved in the negotiations as a full party,
such meetings show that the international community realizes that
the conflict settlement is impossible without Karabakh’s involvement.

“The meeting was not expected to lead to a breakthrough, but we must
say that the OSCE makes serious efforts to achieve peaceful settlement
of the conflict,” the spokesman said.

Source: Panorama.am

From: Baghdasarian

Football : L’Armenie Remonte Dans Le Classement Mondial

FOOTBALL : L’ARMENIE REMONTE DANS LE CLASSEMENT MONDIAL

ARMENIE

L’Armenie a grimpe de 23 positions a la 66e place dans le classement
des 200 nations jouant au football publie par la FIFA.

Avec la Finlande et la Guinee equatoriale comme voisins, l’Armenie a
considerablement ameliore sa position puisqu’il occupait la 89e place
le mois dernier après une une douloureuse defaite a domicile 0-1 face
a Malte.

La remontee spectaculaire est du a la victoire 4-0 sur le Danemark
(actuellement classe 27e) dans un match a l’exterieur.

mardi 16 juillet 2013,
Stephane ©armenews.com

From: Baghdasarian

Armenian Opposition: Possibility Of Tactical Alliance – 1

ARMENIAN OPPOSITION: POSSIBILITY OF TACTICAL ALLIANCE – 1

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
July 15 2013

15 July 2013 – 11:27am
Susanna Petrosyan, Yerevan, exclusively to VK

Recently, the system of the Armenian authorities has been galvanized
by a row concerning the registration of the company in an offshore
zone in Cyprus in the name of Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan, as
well as facts relating to the disclosure of abuse by the government,
which is reflected in a report by the Control Chamber. (See “Armenia:
the principle of the “weak link”). These events have caused great
public interest and could not help affecting the processes within the
government. It can be seen that behind the outward calm and unity of
the government there is tension that takes both explicit (in the form
of a statement by speaker Hovik Abrahamian, who accused the government
of robbery) and latent forms. In particular, some members of the ruling
Republican Party of Armenia (RPA) are now dissatisfied with the fact
that an utterly discredited prime minister remains in the government,
weakening the regime.

At the same time, the opposition feels quite confident. If we examine
the parliamentary activities of representatives of parties like the
ARF, the “Prosperous Armenia Party” (PAP) and the “Armenian National
Congress” (ANC) during the last year, we can see that these forces
acted with common positions on critical issues such as the government’s
program, the draft state budget and setting up a temporary committee
of the National Assembly on the events of March 1, 2003. MPs from the
three factions showed rare unanimity on the need for the provision
by the parliament as a political body of a political, not a legal,
assessment of the events of March 1. Such a level of parliamentary
cooperation between the opposition forces of Armenia was seen only
in the first half of the 1990s.

Against the backdrop of the deteriorating socio-economic status,
the complete inactivity of the authorities and the impoverishment
of the masses and migration, in Armenia the opposition is ready to
cooperate in implementing the most important political, economic and
legal reforms, and most importantly – is ready to cooperate in the
issue of a change of power.

The ANC, PA and ARF are not satisfied with the policy of the
authorities for various reasons, but there is one important fact –
the interests of these forces are identical on the question related
to prompting the internal order in the country, especially the radical
political reforms that would make Armenia politically and economically
freer. Opposition members are aware that monopoly and corruption
stifle the country’s economy, and to change the situation for the
better real reforms are needed, but their implementation under the
current regime, which only declares the need for reform, is impossible.

We should note that the ANC and ARF, with great controversy in the
past amounting to hostility, have managed to develop cooperation for
the sake of change.

The question of a possible merger of the opposition is still relevant.

Some Republicans, as well as state-controlled experts, are trying to
speculate about the fact that the opposition parties did not combine
into a single unit in the parliamentary elections of 2012. This fact
is being represented as a sign of the weakness and failure of the
Armenian opposition.

To understand whether a united opposition is possible, we should
consider the following fact: there will never be a full merger
between them, because the ANC, PAP and ARF represent different
political niches. In particular, the ARF is a socialist party, and
the ideology of the ANC is social liberalism. The PAP does not have
any clearly-defined ideology, but judging by the applications made
by the party functionaries, it can be assumed that the PAP expects
serious internal party reform, and the party will be ideological and,
most likely, left-wing, because the representatives of the PAP focus
on social issues.

To be continued

From: Baghdasarian

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/analysis/politics/42636.html

Solidarity And The Lone Soldier

SOLIDARITY AND THE LONE SOLDIER

Monday, July 15th, 2013

BY MARIA TITIZIAN

This is how the story (joke) goes…

A young man decides to enlist in his country’s armed forces. The
commanding officer, wanting to see how prepared the young conscript is
for battle asks him a rhetorical question, “You’re on the battlefield
and you see two enemy soldiers approaching. What would you do?” The
young man says, “I would pull out my gun and shoot them.” The CO
then asks, “You’re on the battlefield and you see 10 enemy soldiers
advancing in front of you plus an approaching tank, what would you
do?” The young man responds, “I would throw a hand grenade toward the
tank, and shoot the soldiers with my automatic machine gun.” Unfazed,
the CO carries on, “You’re on the battlefield, and there’s a battalion
of enemy soldiers advancing from the left, two tanks in front of you
and a war jet zooming just over head, what would you do?” The young
man perseveres, “I would use an RPG against the tanks, shoot the
plane down using an anti-aircraft gun, take my automatic machine gun
and shoot the members of the enemy battalion.” The CO doesn’t back
down and says, “OK, you’re on the battlefield, there are two enemy
battalions advancing in your direction, three tanks are approaching
from behind your position and there’s two jets flying over from
different directions, what would you do?” The flustered young man
throws his hands up in the air and says, “I don’t get it, am I the
only soldier in this army??”

I first heard this joke years ago before moving to Armenia. I thought
it was funny then, it still is I suppose but when I heard it retold by
an acquaintance recently, it didn’t make me smile, it made me begin
to understand how alone one could be in the world in the absence of
community or solidarity.

Injustice has been and continues to be a common theme in human
history. As Armenians we have not been immune to it. We have felt the
monumental blow of injustice against us as a people and it continues
still. Only today, we are committing a significant amount of that
injustice against each other. We channel much of our energy to ensure
the international recognition of the Armenian Genocide by demanding
justice, recognition, and reparations, as we should. However, we speak
little about the ongoing assimilation of our people in the world,
what we Armenians consider the White Genocide (djermak chart), the
continuing depopulation of our lands, not only because of economic
hardship and lack of opportunities or hope toward the future but
because of the prevailing injustice in our society.

Many stories and narratives coming out of Armenia speak to the
injustice that continues to be exacted almost on a daily basis.

We have bishops who drive around Yerevan in Bentleys, we have a prime
minister who allegedly has offshore accounts, we have ministers who
abuse their positions and steal from the public purse without a shred
of conscience, members of parliament who know nothing nor care much
for the legislative process, civil servants who have yet to understand
that it is their duty to serve the public and not their interests. I
can go on because the list is long and multifarious. Presumably this
state of affairs is not dissimilar from most other countries, the only
difference is that in more established, democratic nations those who
hold the levers of power are simply more suave and sophisticated in
the way they do these things. There will always be those who consider
themselves above the law because of their wealth, position and power
in almost every country on the planet. Whether or not they are able
to remain above the law is the core of the matter. And then there are
people whose rights are abused, whose innocence are put into question
and are wrongly accused.

The problem with Armenia is that when someone is threatened,
maliciously maligned or charged with a crime they have not committed,
they are left alone to fend for themselves or they are asked to prove
their innocence; a fundamental precept of law has turned on its head.

The presumption of guilt as opposed to the presumption of innocence
seems to be an accepted norm. And there are those who walk away from
committing crimes because of their power and connections or because of
society’s unwillingness to mobilize their support and raise a public
outcry and sometimes because of perceptions.

Two recent cases in the United States underscored the threads of
injustice that exist everywhere. The first was the acquittal of George
Zimmerman of all charges in the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin in
2012. The unarmed African-American teenager, who was 17 at the time,
was shot by Zimmerman who claimed that it was in self-defense – there
were no witnesses to the crime. Today thousands of ordinary Americans
in different cities across the U.S., along with civil rights activists
are protesting the verdict. The Justice Department has said it will
restart its investigation to consider possible separate hate crime
charges against Zimmerman. There is no doubt that a fierce debate
on racial profiling will continue to shape opinions and outcomes in
that country.

The second case is Marissa Alexander who fired a warning shot to defend
herself against her abusive, estranged husband and was sentenced to
20 years in prison for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. In her
case, no one was shot or injured, she had a restraining order against
her abuser, had a legally registered gun and permit and no history
of criminal behavior. While Zimmerman was acquitted of all charges,
Alexander who is African-American will serve 20 years. Once again,
civil rights and women’s groups and individuals are protesting the
verdict.

While it appears that courts and juries deliver verdicts based not
always on evidence but on perceptions and perspectives, the public
will often through its civic actions, force a reopening of a case or
at least spur a national discourse on the matter. Both the Zimmerman
and Alexander cases will continue to be discussed and examined across
all sectors of American society. I don’t know what the outcomes will
be but at the very least those in the United States who are expressing
their outrage will be heard.

In Armenia, the justice system is not just nor is it independent. Most
judges serve their masters because if they don’t they will lose their
position, salary and prestige so they do as they are often told. Civil
society lets out a whimper and then quickly loses interest or moves
on to the next scandal and because so few are ready to put themselves
on the line to ensure justice is served many cases and individuals
are left on their own. People in general are too busy trying to make
ends meet to join in the fight, not surprising considering almost
half the population continues to live in poverty. So when someone
is left to fend for themselves against a state apparatus which is
carefully designed to ensure their downfall or demise, they cannot
depend on a polity that will come to their defense or aid.

That is the difference between Armenia (and countries like Armenia)
and those societies where similar conditions and problems exist.

If the notion of solidarity was ingrained in us, then perhaps these
kinds of injustices could be addressed, if not in the courtrooms
of the country then most definitely on the streets. We’re adept at
fighting against a common foreign enemy but when the enemy lives and
exists among us we forget how to fight. And yes, we have been trying
but it hasn’t been good enough, not yet at least.

The saying, “I might not agree with what you say but I will defend
to the death your right to say it” must become part of our collective
conscience. I don’t always agree with the tactics of certain activists
and organizations when they are fighting against corruption or an
injustice, but I applaud them for doing it and I certainly support
their right to do so and when and if I can, I join them. When an
individual or organization is persecuted by authorities without
legal grounds, when a murderer walks away free, when the rights of an
individual are maligned, we must all join forces, regardless of our
personal feelings and fight the good fight because without solidarity,
we will never foster and create the kind of society needed to sustain
this good land of ours. None of us should feel that we are a solitary
soldier…

From: Baghdasarian

http://asbarez.com/111536/solidarity-and-the-lone-soldier/

Armenian Center Of Excellence In Oncology To Start Working Early Nex

ARMENIAN CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN ONCOLOGY TO START WORKING EARLY NEXT YEAR

18:58 15.07.2013

Liana Yeghiazaryan
“Radiolur”

The construction of the Armenian Center of Excellence in Oncology
consisting of a radioisotopes production center, a diagnostic center
and an oncology clinic started in Yerevan in October 2012. Armenian
Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan visited the construction site today.

The construction works are expected to be completed by November
of the current year. The project forms part of a greater vision
of turning Armenia into a regional center for providing modern and
state-of-the-art medical services outlined in the Action Plan of the
Government of Armenia.

The long-term vision involves the expansion of the project to a
‘cancer care cluster’ and, later to a ‘cancer care city.’

Initially, a core ACEO will be established, comprising an oncology
clinic with one or several PET scanners and a cyclotron. The goal is
to set new domestic standards for excellence in oncology diagnosis
and treatment. ACEO will be embedded in the healthcare infrastructure
with local hospitals and physicians referring patients (estimate:
about 4,000 patients a year).

In a second step, capitalizing on further business opportunities, ACEO
will evolve into a cancer care cluster, adding specialized oncology
services, for example, cancer surgery and children’s cancer care.

Finally, ACEO will develop into an internationally renowned cancer
care city offering ever-more sophisticated oncology services, such
as positron therapy or centers for personalized medicine. ACEO will
become a prime location for patients from around the world seeking
top-notch oncology diagnostics and treatment.

The total cost of the program is about $50 mln. ACEO will
be implemented as a public-private partnership (PPP). The basic
structure foreseen for the PPP provides for active private management
of an entrepreneurial business model and, at the interface with the
Government and full representation of the private investors.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.armradio.am/en/2013/07/15/armenian-center-of-excellence-in-oncology-to-start-working-early-next-year/

Proshyan Elects New Leader After Shooting Death Of Former Head

PROSHYAN ELECTS NEW LEADER AFTER SHOOTING DEATH OF FORMER HEAD

[ Part 2.2: “Attached Text” ]

POLITICS | 15.07.13 | 15:47

Photolure

By Gohar Abrahamyan
ArmeniaNow reporter

Republican Party of Armenia candidate Artur Muradyan (1,317 votes)
won against his main opponent Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF)
Dashnaktsutsyun candidate Vova Sahakyan (1,241 votes) in the Sunday
local government election in Proshyan village.

In the village, six kilometers from Yerevan and population of 4,600,
the need for snap ballot came forth after the April 2 incident in
which 50-year-old Dashnak village head Hrach Muradyan was shot dead
in the courtyard of the village administration.

The winning candidate, who had earlier lost to Hrach Muradyan, has
assessed the voting process as “active, but peaceful”.

“People have asked me to run in this election. I had fought in the
past [the previous elections] and had succeeded. People have always
supported me. True I lost then, but only with tiny difference [in
votes], ” Artur Muradyan says.

ARF member Artur Yeghiazaryan told ArmeniaNow that despite the
peaceful flow of the voting, void of any incidents, there were talks
that outside the polls people were threatened, bribed, etc.

“The figures did not add up in the end, too. In general, I do not
believe passions are going to subside, because the issue has not yet
been resolved, Hrach’s murder has not been solved,” says Yeghiazaryan,
adding that their candidate will most probably protest the Sunday
ballot results.

Political analyst Yervand Bozoyan says Proshyan residents might boycott
the results for a while, but soon will calm down: there won’t be any
major standoff.

“Elections in Armenia are commonly followed by protests, however
they never yield any results. There should be a powerful oppositional
field to restrain the authorities and prevent such actions,” he says.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.armenianow.com/news/47672/proshyan_village_elections

Dashnaks V Sargsyan: Traditional Party’s Accusations Against PM Keep

DASHNAKS V SARGSYAN: TRADITIONAL PARTY’S ACCUSATIONS AGAINST PM KEEP UP POLITICAL DISCOURSE IN DEAD SEASON

POLITICS | 15.07.13 | 12:31

Photolure

By NAIRA HAYRUMYAN
ArmeniaNow correspondent

Accusations by Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF, Dashnaktsutyun)
Bureau representative Hrant Markarian leveled at Prime Minister
Tigran Sargsyan became the main political intrigue in Armenia last
week against the backdrop of a slack political season conditioned by
the period of summer vacations.

The Dashnak leader said the head of the government “declared war”
on the traditional party and was ordering “dirty gossip” against the
ARF in the media as part of this warfare.

The scandal began after a number of media in Armenia reported on
internal processes within the ARF, where unsuccessful attempts were
allegedly being made to dislodge Markarian.

In an interview with RFE/RL’s Armenian Service on July 10, the senior
ARF member said that such articles had been commissioned by Prime
Minister Sargsyan to smear the party that actively criticizes the
official over his failed policies.

It is yet difficult to say what the underlying reasons behind this
scandal are. On the one hand, this may be a defensive reaction of the
ARF leadership, which is really under criticism from within the party
(ARF members do not deny that such criticism does exist). On the other
hand, it may be part of a broader campaign against the prime minister.

This is already the third potentially “deadly” challenge against
Sargsyan in the past few months. The first one was mounted in the form
of the exposure of the prime minister’s links to an offshore company
accused of cheating a local businessman out of millions of dollars.

This accusation has not been denied yet. The second attack on the head
of the government was in the wake of a seemingly insignificant report
by the Control Chamber, but Parliament Speaker Hovik Abrahamyan’s
angry rant in the National Assembly during the hearings channeled
the criticism against the government and its head, in particular.

President Serzh Sargsyan rebuked the parliamentary majority later on,
thus apparently shielding the premier with whom he has worked during
his entire presidency since April 2008.

Abrahamyan also categorically denied the presence of any ‘rivaling’
factions with the majority Republican Party as was alleged by media
that speculated about differences between the parliament speaker and
the prime minister.

And now it is Dashnaktsutyun that makes accusations against Tigran
Sargsyan, alleging that the prime minister had told his close
surroundings that he was at war with this traditional party. The
prime minister’s spokesman denied any such thing, but it did little
to dispel tensions and the matter has become another tinderbox that
may explode anytime in the future.

Experts attribute the latest attacks on the prime minister to his
pro-Western attitude. Tigran Sargsyan has recently been regarded as a
major adept of European integration in Armenia. As holder of the top
executive post he is also likely to named by President Serzh Sargsyan
as his successor in the 2018 elections if, of course, he manages to
‘survive’ politically until then.

Those opposing Armenia’s integration with the West think that by
changing the premier they will be able to change Armenia’s orientation
as well. Armenia is expected to initial an Association Agreement with
the European Union in November, but some already call this prospect
into question given pressures on Armenia coming from pro-Russian
forces. Anti-Western forces in Armenia and abroad have apparently
decided to derail the initialing of the document with the EU choosing
the prime minister as the main target for the purpose.

Meanwhile, there is also another version. The ARF is rightfully
considered as a bearer of nationalist ideology in Armenia and as the
chief opponent of the Turkish-Armenian rapprochement process in its
recent form. With the centennial of the Armenian Genocide in 2015
approaching, major shifts are possible in the region and Armenia may
become an active participant in these processes. The ARF’s passive
position in these processes remains a mystery to many.

Armenian Prosecutor-General Aghvan Hovsepyan recently voiced
territorial claims against Turkey, to which the ARF reacted with
restraint. Perhaps Markarian’s position in this matter, indeed, does
not suit the party’s chapters, especially in the United States and
the Middle East. In the past they also demanded a more active stance
both on the issue of the Armenian Genocide as well as in domestic
politics in Armenia.

Which of these two versions is true is unlikely to become publicly
known any time soon given the closed nature of the Dashnaktsutyun
party. Unless, of course, an Extraordinary General Meeting of the
party is convened and a new party leadership is elected.

From: Baghdasarian

http://armenianow.com/news/politics/47664/armenia_dashnaktsutyun_prime_minister_tigran_sargsyan_politics