BAKU: Lham Aliyev: "Azerbaijan Will Restore Its Territorial Integrit

LHAM ALIYEV: “AZERBAIJAN WILL RESTORE ITS TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY”

Sat 27 December 2014 04:32 GMT | 4:32 Local Time

Text size:

President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev attended the opening of the
Heydar Mosque in Baku.

“The day will come when we restore the Shusha mosque, the Agdam mosque,
all other mosques in Azerbaijan, destroyed by Armenian vandals and
perform praying together there,” said President of Azerbaijan Ilham
Aliyev at the opening ceremony of Heydar mosque in Baku.

The President noted that all issues in Azerbaijan are solved
consistently and purposefully: “The source of our policy is the people
of Azerbaijan. Azerbaijani authorities put desires of the Azerbaijani
people into practice. We will continue to follow this path. I am sure
that all the problems facing the country will be successfully resolved.

In particular, the most painful problem, the Armenian-Azerbaijani
conflict over Nagorno Karabakh conflict will find its solution and
Azerbaijan will restore its territorial integrity. Today strong
Azerbaijani army and economy and our international position allow us
to have hope in this direction. It is our right. We have just demands.

We want to restore our territorial integrity. We want the Azerbaijanis
to live in all the historical Azerbaijani lands, Nagorno Karabakh and
other occupied lands. There will come a time when Azerbaijanis will
live in our historical lands – in Erivan khanate, Zangezur and Goyche.

Therefore, we have to work, to work more actively, every citizen
should contribute to our common cause.

I am fully confident that the day will come when we restore the
Shusha mosque, the Agdam mosque, and all other mosques in Azerbaijan,
destroyed by Armenian vandals and perform praying together. We will
restore our territorial integrity.”

From: Baghdasarian

http://news.az/articles/official/94619

Armenia Lays Groundwork For Dollar Bond Sale

ARMENIA LAYS GROUNDWORK FOR DOLLAR BOND SALE

Wall Street Journal
March 12 2015

By
Ben Edwards

Armenia is planning to meet investors in the U.S. and London about
issuing its second dollar bond, one of the banks arranging the roadshow
said on Thursday.

Deutsche Bank, HSBC HSBC -0.19% and JP Morgan JPM +1.88% are the
banks hired to run the meetings, which are due to start March 16.

Armenia last issued dollar bonds in September 2013, borrowing $700
million at a yield of 6.25% for seven years.

The former Soviet state’s debt has been hit hard by the economic
crisis in Russia, with those dollar bonds now yielding around 6.4%,
according to Tradeweb, having been quoted as low as 4.8% back in June
last year. Yields rise as bond prices fall.

“When you compare how Armenia’s bonds have traded compared to Georgia
or Azerbaijan, Armenia’s been the one that’s been most affected by
what’s going on in Russia,” said Anthony Simond, fixed income macro
research analyst at Aberdeen Asset Management ADN.LN +1.13%.

“That doesn’t mean investors are going to flee from the new bond,
in all likelihood [Armenia’s] going to have to pay a little bit more
in terms of yield to investors,” Mr. Simond added.

Armenia is likely to raise $500 million for between seven and 10 years
from the new bond sale, which could be issued as soon as Thursday
next week.

In addition to the new deal, Armenia is offering to buy back up to
$200 million of its previous dollar bond issue. It will pay face
value for the bonds, which are currently trading at around 98 cents
on the dollar.

The country is rated Ba3 by Moody’s MCO +2.40% Investors service,
three levels below investment grade.

From: Baghdasarian

http://blogs.wsj.com/frontiers/2015/03/12/armenia-lays-groundwork-for-dollar-bond-sale/

Was Armenia The Canary In The ‘Near-Abroad’ Coal Mine?

WAS ARMENIA THE CANARY IN THE ‘NEAR-ABROAD’ COAL MINE?

Transitions Online, Czech Rep.

March 12 2015

Russian moves vis a vis Yerevan were an early indicator of the
Kremlin’s more muscular approach to its former vassal states. From
openDemocracy.by Kevork Oskanian12 March 2015

The current conflict in Ukraine has preoccupied Western media,
analysts, scholars, and policy-makers for well over a year now – and
has left many of the assumptions that once governed relations between
Russia and the West in tatters. There is little doubt that the outcome
of the drama being played out in the east of that country will shape
new rules of the game among Moscow, the former Soviet republics, and
Brussels, possibly for decades. Conscious of this fact, the smaller
states in the EU’s Eastern Partnership region – Moldova, Georgia,
Armenia, and Azerbaijan – view the Ukrainian crisis as a decisive
moment, one that might determine the nature of their statehoods in
the foreseeable future.

To some extent, the plight of the weakest and most dependent of these
smaller states, Armenia, should have alerted policy-makers to the
seriousness of Russia’s intentions in reasserting its position within
“its” near abroad. Indeed, Yerevan was clearly strong-armed into the
Eurasian Customs Union (ECU). The country had been expected to initial
its Association Agreement with the EU in Vilnius in November 2013,
after the successful conclusion of negotiations in June. So when
its president, Serzh Sargsyan, announced his dramatic U-turn on 3
September 2013, it came as a shock to both officials and seasoned
observers of Armenian politics.

STRONG-ARM TACTICS

Previously, the Kremlin had tolerated Yerevan’s limited co-operation
with NATO and participation in the ENP, partly because Yerevan’s
already deep and apparently irreversible military-strategic dependence
on Moscow paradoxically made such engagement palatable; and, in any
case, as was often pointed out by Yerevan in its refusals to join the
Russia-led ECU, Armenia’s small economy did not share a border with
the bloc. For Russia, the gain of Yerevan’s membership was therefore
minimal, both in geopolitical and geo-economic terms. The fact that
it was nonetheless strong-armed into a policy shift should have been
an early signal to all concerned – primarily in the former Soviet
Union – that the Putin administration “meant business” in pressing
ahead with its regional project.

Russian President Vladimir Putin visits Gyumri, Armenia, site of a
Russian military base, in December 2013, three months after Yerevan
announced its abrupt decision to join a Moscow-led trade bloc instead
of signing an association agreement with the EU. Kremlin photo.

While Russia may have gained little with Armenia’s accession to the ECU
– which was formalized at the beginning of this year – the costs for
Armenia have been considerable. These costs go beyond the clash between
the country’s WTO and ECU commitments, or the further deepening of its
economy’s dependence on Russian energy and remittances. They include
Armenia’s much reduced ability to hedge against major geopolitical
shift in its region – something the country once aspired to through
the “complementarity” of its foreign policy.

DEPENDENCE

Armenia’s dependence on Russia was apparent during the Nagorno-Karabakh
war – won in no small part because of Russian material support –
and it intensified following the 1998 removal of the country’s first
post-Soviet president, Levon Ter-Petrosyan, under his successors,
Robert Kocharyan and Sargsyan. But throughout these periods, Yerevan’s
strategic dependence on Moscow was (however partially and imperfectly)
balanced by active participation in Western structures, like various
EU programs – from TACIS [an early-2000s aid program for post-Soviet
states – TOL] to the ENP – and NATO’s Partnership for Peace.

Even after its accession to the ECU, Armenia has displayed a dogged
determination to adhere to the last remnants of complementarity: it
has declared its readiness to negotiate with the EU on an Association
Agreement “lite,” and its representatives in the Parliamentary
Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) pointedly abstained on a
recent resolution suspending Russia’s membership in that body.

To some, this combination of a clear strategic dependence on Russia
with sporadic interaction with the West might seem inconsistent;
it is, however, the result of the contradictory pressures Armenia’s
elites have to contend with – from the domestic and regional levels,
pitting the shadows of the past against the realities of the present
and the uncertainties of the future.

Armenians have largely accepted their country’s pro-Russian orientation
for two reasons. Firstly, the overwhelming focus of domestic politics
on the Karabakh conflict has obscured the costs paid by Armenia
in terms of the hollowing-out of its sovereignty and independence;
secondly, on a regional level, Armenia’s interest in maintaining the
de facto status quo in Karabakh has – so far at least – coincided
with Russia’s interest in maintaining that very status quo.

DOMESTIC POLITICS

The first, domestic element is related to the place of history
in Armenia’s national identity and should therefore be taken as a
constant. If anything, the emphasis put by Armenian governments since
1998 on ethnic rather than civic notions of nationalism has reinforced
the place of Nagorno-Karabakh in local existential narratives.

Continued control over the enclave remains a matter of life and death
for Armenians as an ethnic group; issues of state sovereignty and
independence become secondary considerations that emerge sporadically,
when post-colonial sleights – like the aftermath of the recent Gyumri
massacre, or the humiliation of an Armenian citizen in Russia –
temporarily overwhelm that existential fear.

Much of Yerevan’s pro-Russian “strategic lock” thus emerges from
linkages between the Karabakh conflict and relations with Turkey, in
effect precluding the unequivocal pro-Western, pro-NATO orientation
evidenced in neighboring Georgia. Ankara and Baku are seen as greater
threats than Moscow; and threats are to be balanced against.

But viewed from the second, regional perspective, Armenia’s alliance
with Russia becomes far less secure. Granted, military agreements with
Moscow have provided for security guarantees and preferential arms
supplies. But those security guarantees remain untested and technically
do not extend to the one issue that has moved Armenian politics since
independence – Nagorno-Karabakh; meanwhile, Yerevan’s Russian ally has
become one of Azerbaijan’s largest arms suppliers (admittedly charging
full prices in light of Baku’s enhanced, oil-fueled purchasing power).

DIVIDE AND RULE

Moscow’s – some would say cynical – claim to act as peacemaker within
the Minsk Group (which leads negotiations over Nagorno-Karabakh)
while simultaneously arming both sides in the conflict is part
of a long-running divide-and-rule policy. After all, Moscow has a
fundamental interest in keeping the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict frozen:
Karabakh can be used as a disciplinary mechanism against both Yerevan
and Baku (in fact, sources close to the Kremlin claimed it played
a role in Putin’s pressuring of Sargsyan in 2013). More importantly,
this regional sore precludes any trilateral co-operation among Armenia,
Azerbaijan, and Georgia. It is part of a divide-et-impera approach to
the region that predates by more than a century the transformation of
its three main nations from colonial subalterns to legally sovereign
states.

Armenia’s openings to the West have, partially at least, been driven
by worst-case scenarios: a withdrawal of Russia from the Caucasus,
or a reconfiguration of the divide-and-rule policies outlined above
against Armenia’s interests. Both have been well within the realm of
possibility at various points in the past two-and-a-half decades.

Such hedging has now become much less plausible; and needless to
say, being at the mercy of one single great power is not an enviable
position for a small state to find oneself in.

Kevork Oskanian is a research fellow in political science and
international studies department at the University of Birmingham. He
tweets at @CrazyPsyKO. This commentary originally appeared on
openDemocracy.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.tol.org/client/article/24724-was-armenia-the-canary-in-the-near-abroad-coal-mine.html

The Long Read: NYUAD’s Centre For Photography Unveils A New Collecti

THE LONG READ: NYUAD’S CENTRE FOR PHOTOGRAPHY UNVEILS A NEW COLLECTION OF ANTIQUE IMAGES FROM THE MIDDLE EAST

The National, UAE
March1 2 2015

James Langton

March 12, 2015

The four young women have been living in a box for many years, perhaps
even decades. Exposed to daylight once more, they meet the observer’s
eye with a steady, serious gaze, wearing clothes that suggest comfort
more than fashion.

Behind them is a panorama of shapes familiar to tourists; the Sphinx
and the pyramids at Giza, a world they are physically prevented
from entering by a barbed wire fence but perhaps also by their sex
and circumstances. Yet the intimacy of the group suggests a close
friendship that will long outlast the fraction of a second it takes
for the camera’s shutter to open and close.

The box that was their home, before the women metamorphosed into the
digital realm, found its way to a Cairo street market and then, for
probably just a few pounds, into the hands of an Egyptian photographer,
Yasser Alwan.

Today the women might be said to live in Abu Dhabi, scanned, coded
and tagged as part of a new digital photo archive that will have its
roots in the Middle East but which will belong to everyone.

Alwan has been collecting, as well as taking, photographs for many
years. It is now a large collection, assembled from single images,
from discarded boxes of prints and negatives, and from cast-out
family albums.

The photos date from the 1920s through to the 1950s, although some
are much older. Most likely, all the subjects – and the photographers
– are dead, which is why they were thrown out, to be sold in flea
markets and -second-hand bookshops.

Alwan’s collection has now been acquired by Akkasah, the Centre for
Photography at New York University Abu Dhabi. Akkasah can mean camera
in the dialect of the Gulf, with its roots in the Arabic word for
reflection. In this context, both are relevant and appropriate.

The director of Akkasah is Shamoon Zamir, an associate professor at
the university with a background in both literature and photographic
studies; Ozge Calafato, a journalist who previously worked for the
Abu Dhabi Film Festival, is the project -manager.

If these two are effectively the driving force behind Akkasah, then the
vision is much larger. This is an attempt to establish NYU Abu Dhabi,
and by extension, the UAE, as a centre of excellence for research
into photography.

“For me personally,” says Zamir, “this is another way of signalling
by NYU Abu Dhabi that we want to be here for a long time. That we are
not just fly-by-night, that we are not just making money and getting
out of here. This thing only makes sense over a 10 to 15-year period.”

Alwan’s collection represents the first step. “He’s an old friend,”
says Zamir, “and we knew that he had the collection but didn’t know
what to do with it. So we got into a discussion.” The result is that
Akkasah owns the images, but Alwan retains the commercial copyright.

It is a deal that serves as a model for future acquisitions, with
the centre creating a photo library that stops short of being a
commercial enterprise.

Alwan’s collection numbers around 3,000 photographs. They are slices
of time captured in a fraction of a second. Often all that is known
is the name of the photographic studio, stamped on the prints.

Even if the identities of the subjects and the locations are a subject
of conjecture, they offer tiny insights into the past. A young man
in a sharp suit pulls out the pockets of his trousers in imitation of
Charlie Chaplin. A family of nine, from the matriarch to the youngest
children, pose by a foreign coast that is clearly not Egypt, with
a ship crudely pasted in the background. Is this a message to those
still home from a new world and new life, or a memory of somewhere
left behind?

Other images are even more startling. A location that is clearly
not Cairo comes into focus as pre-war Germany. Here is the stadium
for the 1936 Olympic Games, and that tiny figure on the balcony is
the National Socialist fuhrer, Adolf Hitler. A second image shows an
athletics final. The runner bursting to the front is black. Almost
certainly this is the American sprinter Jesse Owens, at the exact
moment of confounding the Nazi doctrine of racial superiority.

As far as they can tell, says Zamir, an Egyptian man had a romance
with a German woman that somehow ended in Berlin.

Part of the collection, says Zamir, are several hundred photographs
from the same family: “Which is quite sad – presumably someone has
dumped these because someone has died. But also you can see the whole
generations developing through these photographs.”

Another group of images seems to have been returned to the Cairo
studio that took them. Not because the subjects were dissatisfied
but the opposite, judging from the messages written on the reverse:
“‘Out of affection’,” says Zamir, “But I don’t know what it means.”

The process of turning essential boxes of cast-out junk into a
meaningful resource involves, he admits, a “pretty steep learning
curve”, but one of the strengths of Akkasah is that it is part of
one of the world’s leading universities.

“Even if we have scholars here who are not photographic experts but
know something, say about Egyptian history, we can sit down with them
and say: ‘Look at this dress – is it from the 1930s or 1940s? How
old is this building, what is this building, do you recognise this
neighbourhood of Cairo?’ So slowly we build up.”

After Egypt, the plan is to continue collecting abandoned images in
the same way from other Middle East countries: “Morocco, Tunisia,
Yemen – if we can,” says Zamir.

The only other project in the region on this is the Arab Image
Foundation, based in Beirut. “We get asked: ‘Why are you doing this
when there is the Arab Image Foundation?'” says Zamir. “And I point out
that this is an ethnocentric and almost racist connotation, because no
one says: ‘Why is Paris building a photo archive when Vienna already
has one, or London?’ The Arab world is rich and diverse.”

Certainly Akkasah is unique in the Arabian Gulf, for while Qatar is
known to have assembled a large collection for a planned museum of
photography, the project appears to be on hold.

Akkasah, though, will be more than a database of images. “Once we get
the ball rolling on this, it’s not just a matter of putting these
things in boxes and having them here,” explains Zamir. “We have to
build a programme of scholarship around it so that we have resident
scholars, people coming to visit the archive, maybe fellowships on
Middle Eastern photography, courses and workshops.”

The first of these, which also served as a launch party for the
project, took place this week: a three-day conference, Photography’s
Shifting Terrain: Emerging Histories & New Practices, that invited
more than 30 of the world’s leading scholars of photography to the
Saadiyat campus, including the Magnum photographer Susan Meiselas,
who has been working in Kurdistan since the early 1990s and gave a
public talk.

A glance at the list of papers presented over the three-day event
illustrates the potential of Akkasah, although, as we shall shortly
see, it also, perhaps unwittingly, also suggests an apparent black
hole in the study of photography in the region.

Subjects included Shima Ryu, believed to be Japan’s first woman
photographer, who was working in the 1860s, and Latif Al Ani, an Iraqi
documentary photographer born in the 1930s and still living in Baghdad,
but who apparently hung up his camera, unable or unwilling to continue,
after Saddam Hussein seized power in 1979.

Many of the papers focused on the Ottoman Empire, which ruled much of
the region through to 1918; a period in which photography established
itself as an artistic medium. It was a time when Turkey was anxious
that the world perceive it as a forward-thinking, modern culture and
photography was critical in presenting the right -image.

Tourists, of course, had other ideas, flocking to the Middle East
with heads bursting with Orientalist fantasies. The local commercial
photographers were happy to oblige, not just by perching their
European visitors on camels in front of the Pyramids, but cloaking
them in Arab robes, both male and female, in fake studio sets that
represented the harem or desert tent – an enterprise that incidentally
that still continues in several UAE shopping malls today.

A great number of the region’s first professional photographers,
from Istanbul to Cairo, were Armenian. The work of studios like
the Abdullah Freres and David Abdo Studios, in Jerusalem, includes
carefully posed portraits, but also a record of local artisans,
landmarks and street scenes.

Joseph Malakian, of the Middle East and Armenian Photo Archive, who
presented a paper on the conference’s final day, suggests that the
Armenians, as the second-largest minority in the -Ottoman Empire,
were more likely to be both involved in commerce and, as a result of
contact with Christian missionaries, more likely to embrace western
technologies.

He quotes from one Armenian photographer, interviewed in Jordan in
1980, whose words ring true today for the Middle East’s beleaguered
minorities: “We are a minority and have no worries about making
pictures; above all, in the time of persecutions we had to be able
to swiftly begin life again ‘naked’ in a new place. Skills cannot be
robbed and we could always get new lenses and paper wherever we fled.”

Out of around 34 papers presented over three days, the organisers
estimate that about two-thirds related to the Middle East. Topics
included work by contemporary Palestinian artists, perspectives on
Iran and many aspects of photography under Ottoman rule. There were
also papers on Uganda, Benin and Ghana, and an examination of black
portraiture in the United States during the American Civil War.

Only one, though, directly addressed the photographic history of
the country in which Akkasah and New York University Abu Dhabi is
based: the UAE. This is a familiar issue. The Arab Image Foundation
has barely a handful of photographs from the Emirates in its huge
collection. Most of the world’s major photographic agencies hold
selections that might charitably be described as random. Yet life
here has been well-recorded on film since at least the middle of the
previous century. The issue is visibility.

The single exception at last week’s gathering was Michele Bambling,
whose Lest We Forget initiative is supported by the Salama Bint
Hamdan Al Nahyan Foundation. Bambling, a former professor at Zayed
University, has encouraged young Emiratis to share images from their
family collections, showing them to the public at two Qasr Al Hosn
Festivals and with the intention of publishing them in a book.

Zamir says Lest We Forget is the first step in establishing a
vernacular of Emirati photography. Akkasah, he says, is not a
competitor to Bambling or the Arab Image Foundation, but a partner.

The centre, he says, will focus more in the future on the UAE,
particularly seeking out private collections created by expatriate
families. “I think it is really useful if we can work with migrant
communities that have been here for many many years. We don’t have
to own them [the photographs], we just have to digitalise, catalogue
and build up life stories around them.”

Other ideas under consideration include an archive of profiles of
eminent Emiratis: “It’s one way of persuading other Emiratis to
work with us.” The centre has also started commissioning independent
photographers to produce new documentary work centred on the UAE. “It
is a rich documentation of UAE life that in time will become historic,”
he explains.

Creating a database that fully represents Emirati life was always
going to be “a very difficult task”, Zamir accepts, not just in
locating sources of images but also overcoming a cultural reluctance
to share them. In time, he hopes, Akkasah will play a part in helping
to recognise the importance of these collections and preserving them
for the future. “There is a younger generation of students coming
up who are going to have a very different attitude,” he says. “But
unless someone collects it now, it will be gone.”

James Langton is a senior editor at The National.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.thenational.ae/arts-lifestyle/the-review/the-long-read-nyuads-centre-for-photography-unveils-a-new-collection-of-antique-images-from-the-middle-east#full

Theater: Raven Theatre Company’s BEAST ON THE MOON Begins 4/21

RAVEN THEATRE COMPANY’S BEAST ON THE MOON BEGINS 4/21

Broadway World, NY
March 11 2015

Raven Theatre Company to produce Richard Kalinoski’s universally
celebrated Beast on the Moon CHICAGO – The final play of Raven’s
2014-15 season will be Richard Kalinoski’s Beast on the Moon,
a touching and frequently humorous story of two refugees from the
Armenian Genocide as they struggle to build a new life together in
1920’s and 1930’s Milwaukee. Beast on the Moon begins previews on
April 21 and opens on April 27, 2015, playing through June 6.

Beast on the Moon has been produced in 17 countries and 12 languages,
enjoying a four-month New York run in 2005. In 2001, it won France’s
Moliere Award for Best Play (the equivalent to the Tony Award) and
has also received Argentina’s Ace Award, the Osborn Award, the Garland
Award and in 2005 it received the Khorenatsi Medal which was presented
by President Robert Kocharian, on behalf of the country of Armenia.

When it was produced as part of the Humana Festival in 1995, the
Louisville Courier-Journal said that the play “…took its place as
one of the most beautiful, sensitive and emotionally complete dramas
in the 19-year history of Actors Theatre of Louisville’s annual Humana
Festival of New American Plays.” In 2005, The New Yorker called the
play “Compassionate and humane” and The New York Daily News said, “The
play moves from tragedy and turmoil to a profound sense of promise.”

And a review in The London Times Online said of a 2007 Nottingham
production, “The past finds a sort of closure, but the author’s
skill has kept us on tenterhooks throughout, uncertain whether
any happy outcome can be possible.” Beast on the Moon was selected
to be a part of Raven’s 2014-2015 season as it tells a story with
which Michael Menendian, as a first generation Armenian-American,
has a deep personal and cultural connection. The cast also features
Sophia Menendian, a second generation Armenian-American and daughter
of Michael (Raven Theatre’s Co-Founder and Artistic Director).

Joining Raven ensemble member Sophia Menendian on stage will be Raven
newcomers Matt Browning and Aaron Lamm and returning artist Ron Quade.

Sophia Menendian was last seen in Raven’s productions of Sherlock
Holmes and the Case of the Christmas Goose and last season’s Good Boys
and True while Ron Quade last appeared in Brighton Beach Memoirs. Matt
Browning has been seen in The Zoo Story, Richard III and The Glass
Menagerie, while Aaron Lamm has previously appeared in The Crypotgram
at Profiles Theatre and Medea at Theater Y.

The creative team for Beast on the Moon includes Kiley Morgan (stage
manager), Kristin Abhalter (set designer), Mary O’Dowd (props/set
dressing), Diane D. Fairchild (lighting designer), Lauren Roark
(costume designer), Leif Olsen (original music), Joe Court (sound
designer), David Woolley (Fight Choreographer), Zhanna Albertini
(scenic artist), Laura Zarougian (assistant director), Conor Clark
(technical director), Justin Castellano (master electrician), and
Deborah Blumenthal (dramaturgy).

Tickets and information are available at or
773-338-2177.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.broadwayworld.com/chicago/article/Raven-Theatre-Companys-BEAST-ON-THE-MOON-Begins-421-20150311
www.raventheatre.com

Port Of Oakland Refuses To Renew Gephardt Contract

PORT OF OAKLAND REFUSES TO RENEW GEPHARDT CONTRACT

Thursday, March 12th, 2015

Second major port in Calif. rejects Genocide denier Gephardt contract

LOS ANGELES – In yet another setback to Dick Gephardt – a former U.S.

legislator turned lobbyist for Turkey – the Port of Oakland will
not be renewing its six-figure lobbying contract with Gephardt
Government Affairs, according to the Armenian National Committee of
America-Western Region’s Bay Area chapter.

Former House Democratic Majority Leader Dick Gephardt serves as a
registered foreign agent for Turkey and Ankara’s point person in
obstructing American condemnation and commemoration of the Armenian
Genocide. Last month, the Armenian National Committee of America –
Western Region (ANCA-WR) praised the City of Los Angeles and its
political leaders for moving to end a contract worth over $850,000
with Gephardt Government Affairs for advocacy work it was conducting
on behalf of Los Angeles World Airports.

On February 24, 2015 the ANCA-Bay Area chapter wrote to the newly
inaugurated Mayor of Oakland Libby Schaaf to express concerns about
the Port of Oakland’s relationship with Dick Gephardt. The letter
was addressed to the Mayor of Oakland because she is responsible
for nominating all seven members of the Board of Port Commissioners,
which controls the Port of Oakland. In their correspondence to Mayor
Schaaf, the ANCA-Bay Area Chapter respectfully requested that the
Mayor move to immediately end the contractual relationship between the
City of Oakland (through the Port of Oakland)and Gephardt Government
Affairs, based on that firm’s work, as a paid foreign agent of the
Republic of Turkey, to deny the Armenian Genocide and prevent the
proper commemoration of this crime against humanity. The letter to
Mayor Schaaf, in part, asserted that “It is our understanding that
Gephardt Government Affairs, as a matter of public record, has enjoyed
a six-figure contract ($160,000 a year) with the Port of Oakland. We
appreciate that this contract was not granted during your term in
office. However, we do find it unacceptable that the City of Oakland
– which is home to a longstanding Armenian American community – the
majority of whom have family who were either murdered or brutalized
during the Armenian Genocide – has had a contractual relationship with
a lobbying firm that profits from genocide denial. Such a relationship
clearly falls far short of the humanitarian and ethical standards of
the City of Oakland.”

“Dick Gephardt’s unethical work in denying the Armenian Genocide
makes his firm persona non grata here in the State of California,”
remarked ANCA-Western Region Chair Nora Hovsepian. “Thanks to the
great work of our ANCA chapters in Los Angeles and the Bay Area –
Gephardt and his firm are beginning to pay a real price for their
denial of the Armenian Genocide. As far as the ANCA is concerned,
no public agency in the United States and especially in the State
of California, should be spending taxpayer dollars on an unethical
lobbying outfit that makes money denying the murder of 1.5 million
human beings,” Hovsepian emphasized.

Earlier this month, the Gephardt firm signed a new lobbying deal with
the Republic of Turkey in which it will be paid $1.7 million from
March through December 2015 to actively deny the Armenian Genocide,
among other activities. Dick Gephardt has made a name for himself on
Capitol Hill by trading on his congressional connections for his work
on behalf of the Republic of Turkey. As documents filed with the U.S.

Department of Justice under the Foreign Agent Registration Act
(which regulates the lobbying activity of those who advocate on
behalf of foreign interests in the United States) reveal, Gephardt
himself has had to disclose the fact that he acts on Turkey’s behalf
as an ardent opponent of legislative efforts to fully recognize the
Armenian Genocide.

New York Times writer and author of “This Town” Mark Leibovich outed
Gephardt in 2013 for his hypocrisy on the Armenian Genocide. In a
television interview later that year, Bill Moyers asked Leibovich
about Gephardt’s stand on the Armenian Genocide. “In the House [of
Representatives] he [Gephardt] had supported a resolution condemning
the Armenian Genocide of 1915. When he left Congress he was paid about
$75,000 a month to oppose the resolution,” Moyers commented. Leibovich
responded by sharing, “Yes. I guess the word genocide goes down a
little easier at those rates.” Also in 2013, Christopher Buckley,
the son of William F. Buckley, wrote a review of “This Town” in The
New York Times in which he cited Gephardt’s genocide denial efforts.

“There are a number of sanctimonious standout “formers” in Leibovich’s
Congressional hall of shame, but just to name a few exemplars who
gleefully inhabit ethical no-worry zones and execute brisk 180-¬degree
switcheroos on any issue, including the Armenian genocide, so long
as it pays: Dick Gephardt…”

In his most recent anti-Armenian actions on Capitol Hill, Dick Gephardt
aggressively lobbied against H.R. 4347 in the 113th Congress, a House
measure to return Christian churches in Turkey to their rightful
owners. Last year he also did the bidding of his lucrative Turkish
Government client by fighting against a U.S. Senate resolution on
the Armenian Genocide. Despite Gephardt’s opposition, the Armenian
Genocide bill advanced in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in
April of last year was ultimately adopted by the full committee by
a vote of 12 to 5.

The move by the ANCA-WR to seek termination of LAWA’s contract with
Gephardt and to ensure that his contract with the Port of Oakland
was not renewed coincides with the launch of a nationwide campaign
by a coalition of Armenian American groups, including the ANCA, to
pressure Gephardt, former House Speaker Dennis Hastert (Dickstein
Shapiro, LLC), Greenberg Traurig, Alpaytac, and LB International to
stop advancing the Turkishâ~@¨Government’s Armenian Genocide denial
agenda or face public scrutinyâ~@¨and protest. The effort was launched
this past January with over 200â~@¨letters sent to Turkey’s lobbying
firms and the top businesses, universities, and NGOs who use their
services, urging them to promptly drop their association with Turkey’s
genocide denial or end their relationships with these public relations
firms. Among those receiving letters were PepsiCo, TIME Inc., Amazon,
and the Chrysler Corporation, in addition to many others.

The Armenian National Committee of America-Western Region is the
largest and most influential Armenian American grassroots advocacy
organization in the Western United States. Working in coordination
with a network of offices, chapters, and supporters throughout the
Western United States and affiliated organizations around the country,
the ANCA-WR advances the concerns of the Armenian American community
on a broad range of issues.

From: Baghdasarian

http://asbarez.com/132923/port-of-oakland-refuses-to-renew-gephardt-contract/

Vardan Khachatryan. "The Turks Need To Address Their Unveiled Past."

VARDAN KHACHATRYAN. “THE TURKS NEED TO ADDRESS THEIR UNVEILED PAST.”

March 12 2015

On March 11, the Center for the Prevention of Genocide, the “Armenia”
people’s initiative and the Supreme Council Parliamentary club
organized a discussion at the Tekeyan Cultural Center entitled “The
new aspirations of modern politics for destruction of the peoples in
the Middle East and its relation with the genocides in Turkey”. Head
of the Center for the Prevention of Genocide Onik Mnacakanyan said
that the session is primarily dedicated to the genocide of Assyrians,
Greeks and also Yezidis. The Yezidi community representative did not
attend the event, as the organizers say, due to reasonable excuses.

Former NA MP, expert in religious studies and theologian Vardan
Khachatryan said that during the previous discussion, the resolution
adopted by the Center for the Prevention of Genocide was sent to
abroad. In his words, it contained an emphasis that we are dealing with
a public genocidal policy. “There was a state plan and it was presented
that the plan for destruction of Armenian supporting Christians and
Russians was driven by the interests of Turkey.”

According to speaker, in the result of re-emphasis of the resolution,
an evidence was brought that genocide was not carried out against
Armenians only, now, in the same region, we are dealing with genocides,
because formerly, the genocide committed by Turkey was not responded
worthily. “Differentiation of the roots and causes of the genocide is
the top priority of humanity… The grounds of the genocide should not
be sought in today’s Islamic extremists. And if they did not address
the unveiled past, did not accept their face and the homophobia
policy cannot remain unpunished,” says Vardan Khachatryan, adding
that the series of TV bridges are upcoming. President of Patrida
NGO of Greeks of Armenia Eduard Polatov disagrees with the presented
number of the martyrs resulted by the genocide of Armenians and the
Greeks. He believes that more Armenians and Greeks have been killed
in the result of Turkey’s policy and the violence. “The Turks do
not kill Christian Armenians, they can also kill Muslim Armenians,
in other words, the gene, what they did is a genocide… We see the
effects of all of these in Lebanon and Syria, and hear Erdogan’s
cynical phrases regarding the fact when he was asked about being an
Armenian or a Greek … We do not have hatred towards the Turkish
people, but it’s time to call things by their names…”

Gohar HAKOBYAN

Read more at:

From: Baghdasarian

http://en.aravot.am/2015/03/12/169217/

George Clooney Teams Up With VCs In Humanitarian Effort

GEORGE CLOONEY TEAMS UP WITH VCS IN HUMANITARIAN EFFORT

Upstart – Biz Journals
March 12 2015

by Don Seiffert

Flagship Ventures founder Noubar Afeyan has enlisted the help of
George Clooney and others to honor people who put themselves at risk
to help others.

Noubar Afeyan is known locally as founder and head of Flagship
Ventures, one of the largest locally-based investors in early-stage
companies looking to save or improve lives by innovating heath care.

But Afeyan has also long been involved in philanthropic efforts to help
humanity, and he doesn’t see the two activities as all that different.

“I actually do find a great deal of overlap between what I do in my
personal life and what I do professionally,” Afeyan said.

This week, Afeyan is launching a new humanitarian effort with two
other internationally-known philanthropists, Russian entrepreneur Ruben
Vardanyan and Vartan Gregorian, president of the Carnegie Corp., called
100 Lives. The initiative is rooted in next year’s centennial of the
Armenian Genocide, in which 1.5 million people died at the hands of
the Ottoman government between 1915-1923, and one project will be to
uncover stories of survivors and people who saved lives during that
period. All three founders of 100 Lives are of Armenian descent.

But another project that is aimed at recognizing present day acts
of heroism has enlisted the help of George Clooney, founder of the
Not On Our Watch foundation which highlights genocide globally, as
well as Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel, professor emeritus at
Boston University and survivor of the German Holocaust. That project,
called the Aurora Prize for Awakening Humanity, will be given annually
by Clooney and Weisel to people who put themselves at risk to help
others starting next year.

It’s a cause to which Afeyan owes his identity, in a sense. The
Armenian immigrant says his grandfather lived near Istanbul a
century ago, and twice was taken to be executed. He was saved,
in what Afeyan calls an “ironic” twist, by a German officer during
World War I. Since then, Armenians have “not only recovered, but have
struggled to survive” and now have strong communities in the U.S.,
including in Watertown, Massachusetts.

It was the example of people like his grandfather who Afeyan says
influenced him to become the head of the Cambridge-based Flagship,
which has raised more than $800 million since he founded it in 2000
to invest in early-stage biotech and healthcare firms. He is also
involved with several local Armenia groups, and in 2008, he received
the Ellis Island Medal of Honor.

“I’m a descendant of survivors,” he said. “It has not only caused me
to not take life for granted, but if you’re a descendant of survivors,
you don’t take anything for granted.”

From: Baghdasarian

http://upstart.bizjournals.com/money/loot/2015/03/12/george-clooney-teams-up-with-vcs-in-humanitarian.html

Armenia Mandates Banks For US Dollar Bond

ARMENIA MANDATES BANKS FOR US DOLLAR BOND

Reuters
March 12 2015

By Michael Turner
Thu Mar 12, 2015 3:44pm IST

LONDON, March 12 (IFR) – The Republic of Armenia has mandated
Deutsche Bank, HSBC and JP Morgan to arrange investor meetings for
a US dollar-denominated bond, according to a lead.

The meetings will take place in the US and London, beginning from
March 16 for a potential Reg S/144A benchmark-sized bond.

Armenia has also announced a tender offer to buy back up to US$200m
of its outstanding US$700m bonds due September 2020.

Bondholders have until March 18 to sell their bonds back to the
sovereign under the offer.

Armenia is rated Ba3 with a negative outlook by Moody’s and B+ with
a stable outlook by Fitch. (Reporting By Michael Turner; edting by
Alex Chambers)

From: Baghdasarian

http://in.reuters.com/article/2015/03/12/armenia-bonds-idINL5N0WE1IK20150312

BAKU: How Can Belarus Help Resolve Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict?

HOW CAN BELARUS HELP RESOLVE NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT?

Trend, Azerbaijan
March 12 2015

12 March 2015, 15:07 (GMT+04:00)

Baku, Azerbaijan, March 12

By Anakhanum Khidayatova – Trend:

The topical issues related to OSCE Minsk Group’s activities in the
settlement of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict will
be discussed in Minsk, Belarusian embassy in Baku told Trend on Mar.12.

The discussions will be held by Minsk Group co-chairs Igor Popov
(Russia), James Warlick (US) and Pierre Andrieu (France) and OSCE
chairperson-in-office personal representative Andrzej Kasprzyk who
are on a visit to Minsk.

They will also focus on the possible contribution of Belarus to the
settlement of this conflict.

During the visit that will last till Mar.13, it is planned to hold
a meeting in Belarusian Presidential Administration.

Moreover, OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs are scheduled to meet the
country’s Foreign Minister Vladimir Makei.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in
1988 when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. As a
result of the ensuing war, in 1992 Armenian armed forces occupied
20 percent of Azerbaijan, including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and
seven surrounding districts.

The two countries signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The co-chairs
of the OSCE Minsk Group, Russia, France and the US are currently
holding peace negotiations.

Armenia has not yet implemented the UN Security Council’s four
resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the
surrounding regions.

From: Baghdasarian