Hollande Turned Sargsyan Down

HOLLANDE TURNED SARGSYAN DOWN

Francois Hollande’s congratulatory message stood out among other
congratulatory messages because besides congratulating Hollande also
invited him to France. Hollande’s message states that he would be
happy to discuss regional and bilateral issues with Sargsyan in Paris.

This statement is interesting because the French president has
actually turned down Serzh Sargsyan’s invitation to visit Armenia and
is waiting for Serzh Sargsyan in Paris. The point is that after Serzh
Sargsyan’s big visit to France last fall Armenia’s foreign minister
Edward Nalbandyan said in a joint press conference with his Latvian
counterpart Armenia is waiting for President Hollande’s state visit
to Armenia, which will be an important haven for the development of
our relations.

If the foreign minister says “next year” which is 2013, it means
there was an invitation from Armenia, which Hollande did not refuse
and even promised to come since Nalbandyan was so confident.

Now it becomes known that Hollande will not come to Armenia but is
waiting for Serzh Sargsyan in Paris. Perhaps this is the attitude
of official Paris to the European Union and the U-turn towards the
Customs Union. At first sight, it seems that Hollande is expressing a
friendship to Serzh Sargsyan when he invites him to France. In reality,
however, the president of France uses the language of diplomacy
to cancel Yerevan’s expectations, and besides he is inviting Serzh
Sargsyan to give explanations.

The attitude of France is understood because Paris is one of the
“sponsors” of Yerevan’s policy, a friendly state that facilitates
promotion of Armenia’s interests in Europe, supports openly, sometimes
not so. Serzh Sargsyan’s decision to join the Customs Union hits
France and leaves this country in an awkward situation.

At the same time, it is important to not just reprimand or express
dissatisfaction but discuss further steps of Armenia, primarily the
Armenian-Turkish issue and Artsakh, as well as Iran and Syria. Paris
will try to feel the stock of predictability or probability of Armenia,
trying to prevent possible capitulation of Yerevan, which hits the
interests of both Armenia and the North Atlantic community.

However, it is interesting to know whether the new government of
France has figured out its Caucasian policy. At least, there has been
uncertainty on this part since Hollande’s election. The new president
of France focuses more on French and Union issues. He may have planned
some messages to Armenia regarding the policy on the Caucasian policy
within the framework of a state visit but Hollande’s messages would
not sound so serious from Customs Armenia, therefore he cancelled
such a protocol visit, appointing a meeting with Serzh Sargsyan on
Champs Elisees instead.

Hakob Badalyan 11:28 24/09/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30950

L’independance De L’Armenie Est Irreversible, Insiste Sarkissian

L’INDEPENDANCE DE L’ARMENIE EST IRREVERSIBLE, INSISTE SARKISSIAN

POLITIQUE

L’independance nationale de l’Armenie n’est pas en danger , a
martele le President Serge Sarkissian le week-end dernier alors
que ses detracteurs affirmait qu’elle etait compromise par sa
decision inattendue d’adherer a l’union douanière eurasiatique des
ex-republiques sovietiques dominee par les Russes .

” Nous vivons dans un pays libre et toutes les questions peuvent etre
debattues. Mais il y a une chose qui en tout etat de cause ne pourra
pas changer : c’est la souverainete de la Republique d’Armenie “,
a declare Sarkissian dans un discours lors d’une reception officielle
organisee a l’occasion de l’Independance de l’Armenie.

“C’est un reve qui s’est realise et un devoir qui nous accompagne
toujours , ” a-t-il declare . ” Cette fete est l’heritage du sang
de nos heros et nous avons pour obligation de la transmettre a nos
petits-enfants. ”

Ces propos visaient a apaiser les craintes soulevees par l’opposition
armenienne et les cercles civiques par la decision de Sarkissian du
3 septembre de faire adherer l’Armenie a l’union douanière eurasienne
que les critiques decrivent comme une tentative de recreer l’ancienne
Union sovietique. D’où les protestations contre le risque que fait
prendre a l’independance de l’Armenie sa volte-face de dernière minute.

Des experts armeniens pro-occidentaux ont declare lundi que le
retournement de Sarkissian avait gravement endommage la reputation
internationale de l’Armenie et qu’il mettait le pays a la merci de
son maître de l’ex-Union sovietique . Boris Navasardian , qui dirige
une coalition d’organisations non gouvernementales ~uvrant pour
l’integration europeenne, a declare que Moscou va maintenant dicter
les termes de l’adhesion de l’Armenie a l’union douanière .

” Ce que nous allons ceder en termes de souverainete ne sera pas
le resultat de notre propre decision, ” Navasardian dit au service
armenien de RFE / s ‘ RL ( Azatutyun.am ) . ” Personne ne nous
demandera plus notre opinion. Et c’est la le principal danger pour
notre Etat independant ” .

” L’Armenie court le danger de devenir un peu plus une garnison russe
“, a-t-il estime .

Les allies politiques de Sarkissian arguent de leur côte que Erevan
n’avait pas d’autre choix que de succomber a la pression russe
sur l’union douanière etant donne sa forte dependance a l’egard de
Moscou pour la defense et la securite. Ils estiment que la cooperation
militaire avec la Russie est vitale pour la poursuite contrôle armenien
sur le Haut-Karabakh .

Navasardian a rejete ces arguments, affirmant que Sarkissian a cede a
la peur de perdre le pouvoir. Il a declare qu’en cas de confrontation
ouverte avec le Kremlin ” les forces puissantes armeniennes qui ne sont
pas interessees a la democratisation du pays et a la liberalisation
de son economie pensent que la perte du soutien russe constitue une
menace pour l’actuel president et le gouvernement. ”

” C’est le principal danger qui a pousse notre president a faire
une telle declaration. Le danger de perdre son pouvoir “, a ajoute
Navasardian .

Giragosian a egalement insiste sur le fait que la securite nationale
n’etait pas le facteur cle de ce changement dramatique d’orientation.

Pour lui, l’accord d’association qu’Erevan etait proche de signer
avec l’Union europeenne ne menacait ni la presence militaire russe
en Armenie ni les liens russo -armeniennes. L’Armenie est desormais
consideree par l’UE comme ” moins fiable , moins fiable et moins
importante”, a-t-il dit .

mardi 24 septembre 2013, Ara ©armenews.com

From: Baghdasarian

ANKARA: At the Zero Point of the ‘Rojava’…

Radikal, Turkey
Sept 19 2013

At the Zero Point of the ‘Rojava’…

by Cengiz Candar

[Translated from Turkish]

Nusaybin -Former Diyarbakir Chamber of Industry and Trade Chairman
Mehmet Kaya began on the telephone by saying: “Now I am talking in my
identity as a pharmacist.” He continued: “The Rojava [Kurdish term for
‘west,’ used in reference to northern Syria] is falling apart from
lack of drugs. We have launched a campaign on a regional scale. We
have collected four truckloads of medicines and medical supplies. But
we are unable to get them to the other side of the border. If you
could just make this knowna¦”

I answered him saying: “Tomorrow I will be in Nusaybin. I will better
understand the situation there, and will write about it.” The
following day (that is, yesterday), while going down from Mardin
towards the “Silk Road,” the towns of the Rojava that have gone into
the de facto administration of the Kurds were lined up before my eyes
like beads on a string of prayer-beads, and presented a very clear
image. On the right, just across from Senyurt was Derbesiye
[Al-Darbasiyah], while diagonally to the left was Amudah. As for
Al-Qamishli, the largest town in the north of Syria, it is just next
to Nusaybin.

While travelling on the Silk Road towards Nusaybin, the right side of
the road was lined with barbed wire, and there were control towers at
regular intervalsa¦ The Deputy Mayor of Nusaybin, at the wheel, said
“if there should be an accident, and if a car should roll over to the
right, even if nothing might happen otherwise, the mines would
detonate and blow it to bits” and pointed to the minefields just
through the barbed wire, which fill the strip of land between it and
the railroad that comprises the Turkish-Syrian border.

All along the road between Diyarbakir and Nusaybin, he explained to me
how the entire region is focusing on nothing but the Rojava. He has
relatives in Al-Qamishli, just like a good many Nusaybin residents.
Indeed, at the moment, at least 10,000 Syrian citizens have taken
refuge with their relatives in Nusaybin -as Mayor Ayse Gokkan related,
pregnant women, the very aged, and children.

In Nusaybin, with its population of 85,000 people, I spoke with Ayse
Gokkan in the garden of the Mitanni Culture Centre, where the Second
Symposium on Nusaybin in the History of Mesopotamia was being held,
practically next to Al-Qamishli, whose population in normal times has
risen to 350,000. I say: “We are at the absolute zero point between
Turkey and Syria, aren’t we?” She points to just a bit away; the place
where we see the sandbags is considered the border.

Essentially, there is no border or anything of the sort. The Cagcag
River passes through both Nusaybin and Al-Qamishli. And on both sides
of the “virtual” border live Kurds, Assyrians, and Arabs. Epidemic
diseases, and communities that are intimately intertwined, in fact
show no respect for the border on either side of what has essentially
throughout history been the same town (the historical town of
Nusaybin).

Doctor Ramazan Kaya, who is from Nusaybin, tells me about the diseases
caused by the conditions in Syria that are spreading into Turkish
territory from Al-Qamishli and being seen once again in Turkey
-particularly in Mardin province:

“Although cases of measles had not been seen in our region for the
past 10 years, now there are cases numbering in the hundreds being
diagnosed. Cases of malaria had likewise not been seen in the past
decade, but in 2012, over 300 cases of malaria were diagnosed in
Mardin. And cases of Aleppo boil and polio, which had appeared to have
been eliminated, have also begun to be seena¦”

He speaks of reports drawn up regarding what needs to be done, but it
is clearly understood and seen in Nusaybin that the developments in
Syria, by quickly crossing over the Turkish-Syrian border, have been
“infecting” Turkey in every sense.

Mayor Ayse Gokkan, from Suruc (she comes from a village just across
from Kobani [Ayn al-Arab] in the Rojava), who was elected with an
overwhelming majority of almost 90 per cent of the votes in Nusaybin,
complains of the “indifference” of the state in Turkey, which in her
view is strange, and which she sees as excessive. At any rate, as a
result of the pressure created by the public in Nusaybin, which had
come to the point of explosion, and of her own unrelenting contacts,
there has been, for the first time in a month (and the third time
overall), a transit of “aid for the Rojava.”

She said: “We will be in Senyurt in the evening, until morning. Come
and see; we are going to send across 400 tons of food and medical
aida¦”

We were going to leave the “Symposium on Nusaybin in the History of
Mesopotamia” and go to the Senyurt border gate near Kiziltepe, in
order to witness the crossing of dozens of trucks. Indeed, all day
long, Nusaybin was abuzz with excitement on this issue.

Well, then, why, when it was possible to send the aid across to
Al-Qamishli, which is only a stone’s throw away from Nusaybin, did we
have to go 45 minutes further, to the vicinity of Kiziltepe?

Because there are still officials of the Damascus regime at two points
in Al-Qamishli, at the border crossing and at the airport, and they
are keeping the border closed. Al-Qamishli is de facto governed by the
Heyeta Bilind, that is, the “High [Kurdish] Council,” in which the PYD
[Democratic Union Party] predominates. Ayse Gokkan said that “we can
meet at the barbed wire and talk with the High Council whenever we
want,” and thus explained how “unified” the Kurdish struggle on both
sides of the border has become.

For quite a long time, Al-Qamishli has reportedly been open to
crossing in both directions, but Nusaybin has been closed. The
Nusaybin Mayor expressed her astonishment, saying: “We cannot
understand why Turkey closed this crossing for so long.” But now
Nusaybin is open but Al-Qamishli is closed.

Ayse Gokkan explained the reason for this as follows: “Since (PYD
leader) Salih Muslim began to come to Turkey, the Syrians then closed
Al-Qamishli.” As for Turkey’s continually dragging its feet in terms
of opening the Senyurt crossing, she said: “There is only the PYD as
an interlocutor in Derbesiye, on the Syrian side across from Senyurt.”

Kobani and Afrin, the other crossing points into Syria, are also under
the sole control of the PYD, while the Akcakale-Til Abyad and
Karkamis-Jarablus crossings are under the control of the Free Syrian
Army, or in the description of the people of Nusaybin, “the gangs.”
What is meant by “the gangs” is Al-Qa’idah and the other Salafist
organizations in Syria.

The area between Al-Qamishli and Serekaniye, that is, between Nusaybin
and Ceylanpinar, is under the control of the Kurds -essentially the
PYD -and is an area of merciless conflict between “the gangs” and the
PYD/Kurds.

A little later, we would set out for Senyurt, in order to witness the
dispatch to the Rojava Kurds of the 400 tons of food and medical
assistance that the Kurds of Turkey had collected. Just then, a
Turkish journalist working as a cameraman for a foreign television
company approached me in the garden of the Mitanni Culture Centre and
felt the need to provide me with some information:

“At this time yesterday evening, we were in Ceylanpinar. I saw with my
own eyes that six or seven buses, absolutely filled with people,
crossed over rapidly to the other side, to Serekaniye.”

The “Syrian photograph” that can be taken from Nusaybin is that
“Turkish Kurds are providing food and medicine support to the Kurds of
Syria, while someone else in Turkey is, across the same border,
providing military assistance to the militant Islamist groups in
Syria.”

Before setting off on the road from Nusaybin to Kiziltepe, I looked
one more time at the poster on the wall of the Mitanni Culture Centre.
The advertisement for the symposium was, from the top to the bottom,
written in Kurdish, Turkish, Arabic, and the language of Jesus,
Aramaic (Assyrian). The symposium was a serious academic activity
dealing with the “School of Nisibis,” which came about in the fourth
century A. D. and according to some historians was the world’s first
university.

The “School of Nisibis” is evidence of the extraordinary historical
role of the Assyrians and Eastern Christians in this region. So let us
come to the Christians today, who have reportedly fallen to below four
per cent of the total population of the Middle East, which is the
cradle of religions. Yet at the beginning of the First World War, this
percentage was 20 per cent. The possibility exists that, one or two
generations later, there will be no Christians left in the Middle
East.

Certainly it was, first of all, [the Armenian Genocide of] 1915 that
brought the 20-per cent proportion down so drastically. And most
recently, there have been the civil war in Lebanon, the negative
developments in the Palestine area, the war in Iraq, the attacks
against the Copts in Egypt, and naturally, the current state of
affairs in Syria.

A very striking article in the latest issue of Foreign Affairs,
entitled “The Christian Exodus,” concludes as follows: “… The
disappearance of the region’s Christians would also be a disaster for
Muslims. They would confront the task of establishing honourable
societies following these tyrannies. And this would be even more
difficult with the disappearance of the Christians living in their
midsta¦ The Muslims would thus have done away with pluralism, which
is the foundation of genuine democratic social lifea¦”

It is evident that it is the Kurds who in our day best understand this
reality. Particularly those in Turkey, those in the Rojava, and those
in the “South” [Iraqi Kurdistan].

Can we, I wonder, speak of an “alliance between Kurds and non-Muslims”
blossoming in the Middle East, and of this being the greatest
guarantee of “democracy” in the region in the future?

Nusaybin, at least, leads a person to ask this question at the “zero
point” of the Rojavaa.

From: Baghdasarian

Armenian FM to leave for Russia

Armenian FM to leave for Russia

15:22 – 22.09.13

Armenian FM Edward Nalbandian is to leave for Sochi, Russia, the coming Monday.

The Armenian FM is to participate in a joint meeting of the FMs,
Ministers of Defense and Secretaries of the National Security Councils
of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) member-states,
the press service of Armenia’s foreign office reports.

Armenian News – Tert.am

From: Baghdasarian

Francois Hollande: Armenia has been successfully advancing on the ro

Francois Hollande: Armenia has been successfully advancing on the road
to democracy

20:47 21.09.2013

President of France Francois Hollande has sent a congratulatory
message to President Serzh Sargsyan on the occasion of Armenia’s
Independence. The message reads:

`Mr. President,

On the occasion of the national holiday of the Republic of Armenia, I
send my best wishes for happiness and success to You and the entire
Armenian nation.

Since independence, Armenia has been successful advancing on the road
towards prosperity and democracy due, in particular, to bold reforms
conducted in the framework of Armenia’s dialogue with the European
Union. I would like to reiterate France’s unequivocal support to the
continuation of that undertaking.

As You know, I attach great importance to the friendly relations and
cooperation between Armenia and France. I would like together with You
to continue our work for strengthening these relations in the most
decisive way, particularly in the economic area.

Allow me to stress the importance which France, as a Co-Chair of the
Minsk Group, attaches to the progress in the negotiations for the
peaceful resolution of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict.

I will be glad to host You in Paris soon to discuss these topics together.

Please accept, Mr. President, the assurances of my highest consideration.’

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.armradio.am/en/2013/09/21/francois-hollande-armenia-has-been-successfully-advancing-on-the-road-to-democracy/

22nd anniversary of Armenia’s independence marked in UAE

22nd anniversary of Armenia’s independence marked in UAE

September 20, 2013 | 17:54

An event dedicated to the 22nd anniversary of Armenia’s independence
was organized by the Armenian Embassy to UAE on September 19.

The Armenian anthem was followed by a ceremony of granting passports
to new citizens of the Republic of Armenia.

In his speech, Armenian Ambassador Gegham Gharibjanyan presented
Armenia’s path after gaining independence, as well as foreign and
internal policy achievements, Foreign Ministry’s press service
reported.

From: Baghdasarian

http://news.am/eng/news/172270.html

When Head of State Writes Down His Memoires

When Head of State Writes Down His Memoires

Interview with Dr. Haik Martirosyan, University of Sorbonne (New York)

How can Armenia regain its credit in Europe?

Faith and confidence are usually not found in politics or they play a
secondary role. Pragmatism prevails. Obviously, both the EU and its
representative, Commissioner Fule, were shocked by Armenia’s U-turn.
Nevertheless, the commissioner’s words also hint at awareness of the
reasons of the U-turn. So, the problem of loss of confidence is
secondary. Official Yerevan was willing to sign the Association
Agreement but failed to. Obviously, Fule’s criticism was addressed to
another country, not official Yerevan. As to restoring faith and
confidence, it is really hard to do. It is hard to tell what other
U-turns should be expected from Armenia. We are living in an extremely
uncertain and unstable time with ongoing political and historical
revisions on a global level. The behavior of such a country as Armenia
could be determined by the situation in place. In order to have
confidence and faith the EU ought to have displayed earlier and deeper
interest in Armenia and been more active in fostering domestic and
economic reforms.

Was Serzh Sargsyan’s move determined by pressure with regards to the NKR issue?

This question will be officially answered on the day when the head of
state writes down his memoires and publishes them. Meanwhile, Fule did
not have to make such blunt statements. His interview with Radio
Liberty was the most sincere, emotional and non-diplomatic interview I
have ever seen, and it speaks a lot. The unofficial yet factual answer
does not need the president’s confession and the commissioner’s
sincerity. Yes, it is hard to imagine another reason apart from
Karabakh. It is Armenia’s Achilles’ heel, and the big players of the
region know where it is.

What are the possible implications of Armenia’s membership to the Customs Union?

I don’t think we will have an economic progress. I also don’t think
that such standards will be extended to us that would give us a boost
to a higher level of quality. Even the founders of the union lack such
standards. I also don’t think that Armenian products will be
competitive. The market may be flooded with exported goods which will
jeopardize competitiveness of local production. On the other hand,
some monopolies may be shattered or eliminated. We’ll see.

Fule says they will not give up on Armenia. In your opinion, in what
format will they continue to work with Armenia?

What Fule is saying can be from diplomacy where the uttered word means
the opposite. Either the EU will turn its face from Armenia or will
come up with more attractive proposals. Since Armenia might be
punished severely by the key member state of the Customs Union for
refusal to join the Customs Union equivocally, it is not difficult to
suppose that Europe will need to stop fostering hopes relating to
Armenia. This situation may change suddenly but it is already
determined by circumstances that are hard to predict.

23:54 21/09/2013
Story from Lragir.am News:

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/interview/view/30940

Artur Alexanyan (96 kg) vice-champion du monde de lutte gréco-romain

CHAMPIONNATS DU MONDE DE LUTTE A BUDAPEST (HONGRIE)
Artur Alexanyan (96 kg) vice-champion du monde de lutte gréco-romaine

L’Arménien Artur Alexanyan (96 kg) est vice-champion du monde de lutte
gréco-romaine. Lors des championnats du monde à Budapest (Hongrie), le
jeune représentant de l’Arménie (21 ans), natif de Gyumri, médaille de
bronze aux J.O. de Londres (2012) ést arrivé à égalité de points (2-2)
au terme de la finale. Mais ayant reçu un avertissement lors du
combat, les juges ont donné la victoire au Russe Kiril Melnikov. Ce
dernier avait éliminé en demi-finale l’Azéri Chalva Gadabadzé. En
demi-finale, Arthur Alexanyan avait battu le Hongrois Kiss Balazs. En
1/8e de finale, Artur Alexanyan s’était imposé 8-0 face au Bulgare
Vladislav Metodiev.

Ainsi à l’occasion du 22ème anniversaire de l’Indépendance de
l’Arménie, Artur Alexanyan offre une médaille mondiale d’argent lors
de ces championnats du monde de lutte gréco-romaine.

Krikor Amirzayan

dimanche 22 septembre 2013,
Krikor Amirzayan ©armenews.com

From: Baghdasarian

Des dizaines de chefs d’Etats, dont François Hollande, ont salué le

22ème ANNIVERSAIRE DE L’INDEPENDANCE DE L’ARMENIE
Des dizaines de chefs d’Etats, dont François Hollande, ont salué le
22ème anniversaire de l’Indépendance de l’Arménie

Le 22ème anniversaire de l’Indépendance de l’Arménie a été salué par
des dizaines de chefs d’Etats à travers le monde. Bako Sahakian,
président de la République du Haut Karabagh a adressé à son homologue
Serge Sarkissian un message de félicitation. Tout comme les présidents
Vladimir Poutine (Russie), Alexandre Loukachenko (Belarus), Viktor
Ianoukovytch (Ukraine), François Hollande (France), Xi Jinping
(Chine), la Reine Elisabeth II d’Angleterre, le secrétaire d’Etat
américain James Kerry. Les Ambassadeurs étrangers établis en Arménie
ont également félicité le président arménien à l’occasion de la
journée de l’Indépendance le 21 septembre. Vladimir Poutine a salué
les relations arméno-russes « dont les racines plongent dans
l’Histoire » et sa salué « les résultats de la récente visite de Serge
Sarkissian à Moscou ».

François Hollande a salué « l’indépendance de l’Arménie acquise le 21
septembre 1991 et les réussites ainsi que le développement sur la voie
de la démocratie ainsi que le dialogue avec l’Union européenne (…)
comme vous le savez, j’attache une grande importance aux relations
d’amitié et de coopération entre l’Arménie et la France. Je désire
renforcer ces liens (…) dans le cadre du Groupe de Minsk, en tant
que co-présient, la France encourage le règlement pacifique du conflit
du Haut Karabagh ».

Krikor Amirzayan

dimanche 22 septembre 2013,
Krikor Amirzayan ©armenews.com

From: Baghdasarian

Egypt could recognize the Christian Armenian genocide [in Italian]

La Stampa, Italia
15 set 2013

L’Egitto potrebbe riconoscere il Genocidio dei cristiani Armeni

Il paese africano contro la Turchia sul genocidio del 1915

Marco Tosatti
Roma

L’Egitto del dopo-Morsi potrebbe diventare il primo Paese musulmano al
mondo a riconoscere come `genocidio’ lo sterminio degli Armeni,
compiuto a partire dal 24 aprile 1915 dal governo turco nelle terre
dell’allora impero ottomano. Questo potrebbe avvenire in seguito al
passo, senza precedenti, compiuto da un avvocato egiziano, Muhammad
Saad Khairallah, direttore dell’Istituto del Fronte Popolare in
Egitto, che ha presentato una richiesta giudiziaria in tale senso. La
prima udienza storica di questo processo si terrà davanti al Tribunale
del Cairo il 5 novembre 2013.

L’annuncio è stato fatto durante un dibattito televisivo a cui hanno
assistito milioni di telespettatori egiziani. Le recenti vicende di
politica interna egiziana giocano una parte non secondaria in questa
vicenda. Dopo la destituzione di Morsi, leader dei Fratelli Musulmani,
il primo ministro turco, Recep Tayyip Erdogan ha criticato con
severità il nuovo governo ad interim, sostenuto dai militari, e si è
espresso a favore del ritorno al potere del suo amico islamico Morsi.

L’intervento di Erdogan non è stato bene accolto da molti
nell’opinione pubblica egiziana; ed era prevedibile, visti i rapporti
storici non sempre sereni fra i due Paesi. Nei giornali egiziani sono
apparsi numerosi reportages e commenti in chiave antiturca. E il
problema del genocidio armeno, la cui esistenza è negata ancora, a
dispetto dell’opinione di moltissimi storici, dal governo di Ankara è
riemerso con vigore. Sui giornali sono apparsi molti articoli in cui
si chiede al nuovo governo egiziano di procedere al riconoscimento del
Genocidio armeno.

E egualmente vi sono stati molti appelli per sostenere la costruzione
al Cairo di un monumento dedicato alle vittime – fino a un milione e
mezzo, secondo alcune stime – dello sterminio degli Armeni cristiani;
e si è chiesto che il governo compia passi diplomatici per spingere la
Turchia a versare degli indennizzi ai discendenti delle vittime. Il
tema è stato affrontato in particolare al talk show, popolarissimo in
Egitto, intitolato `As-Sura al Kamiila’, `La foto completa’, condotta
da Lilian Daoud. Vi hanno partecipato fra altro l’avvocato Khairallah
e il dott. Ayman Salama, professore di Diritto Internazionale
all’Università del Cairo.

Salama ha informato il suo pubblico che nel 1919 il Triunale militare
turco aveva incolpato alcuni dei criminali responsabili del genocidio
armeno. Diciassette persone erano state dichiarate colpevoli e tre
erano state impiccate. Salama ha ricordato che nel 1915 la Russia la
Gran Bretagna e la Francia avevano pubblicato una dichiarazione
congiunta, in cui affermavano che avrebbero considerato i dirigenti
turchi responsabili dei massacri e dei `crimini commessi contro
l’umanità e la civiltà’. L’avvocato Khairallah ha invece affermato che
la questione del genocidio armeno avrebbe dovuto essere sollevata da
molto tempo in Egitto, e che non ha nessuna connotazione politica. Ha
affermato di sperare che la sua azione legale presso la Corte del
Cairo spingerà l’Egitto `il più grande Paese sunnita del Medio
oriente’ a servire d’esempio a altri Paesi arabi affinché riconoscano
l’esistenza del genocidio armeno. Fino ad oggi solo il Libano ha
compiuto questo passo.

From: Baghdasarian

http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/nel-mondo/dettaglio-articolo/articolo/egitto-egitpo-egytp-armenia-27858/