Sarafian Inspired New Generation

SARAFIAN INSPIRED NEW GENERATION

The Courier Mail (Australia)
September 30, 2013 Monday

RICHARD CASPAR SARAFIAN Film director Born : April 28, 1930 New York
City Died : September 18, 2013 Santa Monica, California

RICHARD Sarafian was an influential film director whose 1971
countercultural car-chase thriller Vanishing Point brought him a
decades-long cult following.

Sarafian worked primarily in television in his early career, directing
episodes of ’60s shows such as Gunsmoke , I Spy and 77 Sunset Strip .

He also directed 1963’s Living Doll episode of The Twilight Zone ,
a chilling tale whose demonic main character Talky Tina terrified
children, including his own.

Deran Sarafian said as a boy he thought the episode was “the most
horrible thing I’ve ever seen” before learning his father had made it.

Richard Sarafian’s directing credits also included episodes of Batman
on television and feature films including Run Wild, Run Free in 1969,
Man in the Wilderness in 1971, and The Man Who Loved Cat Dancing
in 1973.

But Sarafian was best known for Vanishing Point , a dark story of a
drug-fuelled auto pursuit through the Nevada desert brought on by a
bet between a Vietnam vet and his drug dealer.

The film and director had a major influence on the generation of
maverick moviemakers and actors, often referred to as “Easy Riders,
Raging Bulls”, who would come to dominate Hollywood in the 1970s.

“He’s considered one of the original Raging Bulls, that’s why Warren
Beatty and Sean Penn and people like that absolutely adore him,”
Deran Sarafian said.

Beatty was a particularly devoted fan, casting Sarafian in roles in
two of his own films, Bugsy and Bulworth .

He played a gangster in Bugsy in 1991 and a hitman in Bulworth in
1998. And in 2001, he voiced the animated God Beaver character in Dr
Dolittle 2 .

On television, he played a coffee shop owner as a regular member
of the cast of the 1985-1986 CBS situation comedy Foley Square ,
starring Margaret Colin.

He also had a big influence on later directors such as Quentin
Tarantino, who gave him a “special thanks” credit at the end of one
of his films.

In 1997, the Scottish rock band Primal Scream paid tribute to the
director by naming an album Vanishing Point .

“It’s always been a favourite of the band,” leader Bobby Gillespie
said. “We love the air of paranoia and speed-freak righteousness.”

Sarafian was born in New York City to Armenian immigrants. He studied
pre-law/pre-med at New York University and was a poor student but
changed to studying film, at which he excelled.

He left college to join the US Army, in which he served as a reporter
for an army news service.

While stationed in Kansas City, Missouri, during the Korean War
(1950-1953) he met the future Hollywood director Robert Altman, who
went on to direct M*A*S*H , and the two became friends.Sarafian twice
married Altman’s sister Helen Joan Altman, who died in 2011. He is
survived by their four sons and a daughter.

From: Baghdasarian

Alexander Krylov: Successfully Combined Customs Union Membership And

ALEXANDER KRYLOV: SUCCESSFULLY COMBINED CUSTOMS UNION MEMBERSHIP AND CERTAIN FORM OF COOPERATION WITH THE EU WOULD BE A GOOD EXAMPLE FOR EUROPE

ArmInfo’s Interview with Alexander Krylov, Doctor of Historical
Sciences, President of the Scholarly Society of Caucasus Studies,
leading research associate of the Center for Problems of Development
and Modernization at the Institute of World Economy and International
Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

by David Stepanyan

ARMINFO Tuesday, October 1, 23:12

Despite its desire to access the Customs Union that contradicts the
DCFTA – a component of the Association Agreement with the EU – Yerevan
will try to sign a document on a special, lower status of Armenia in
the relations with the EU at the upcoming Eastern Partnership Summit
in Vilnius. How much possible is it?

I haven’t got the impression that Armenia was offered an ‘upgraded
status’ in the relations with the EU before 3 September. Now, it is
offered a ‘lower’ one. The agreement on Armenia’s Association with
the EU seems to be symbolic and shows its aspiration for civilized
and democratic Europe. Nothing practical has been observed so far. It
would be good if the citizens of Armenia received an opportunity of
visa free traveling to the EU and then a similar regime were introduced
also for Russia and other post-Soviet countries.

Establishment of a single European space would give new opportunities
for settling the problems on the continent. Unfortunately, new and new
borders are emerging in Europe and there is no progress in continental
integration. Such trends on the continent do not allow Armenia to
combine cooperation with Europe and the Customs Union membership.

After the Armenian President had taken the decision on Armenia’s
accession to the Customs Union, a number of Russian analysts and
experts started to say that Armenia’s membership of the Customs Union
will be followed by recognition of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic at
least by the member states of the Customs Union – Russia, Belarus and
Kazakhstan. In the meantime, they state that Azerbaijan can avoid such
a scenario only if it joins the Eurasian integration process. Would
you explain the prospects of such pressure on Baku?

Mass media comment on the last integration events as a result of
pressure by the EU and Russia upon these or those countries, for
instance, Armenia and Ukraine. Basically, everything is not so simple.

Actually, two integration unions are being formed which have their own
game rules within the unions as well as regarding the external world.

Nobody can make Armenia or Ukraine join the Customs Union or EU, as
they are independent states, and they themselves choose what to join.

When politicians or experts say that joining any project will have
certain consequences and even losses, it is watched like a pressure,
threats and even “arm-twisting”. Actually, these are just predictions
called to show consequences of these or those steps. It is clear that
Ukraine’s integration in the EU will change the nature of its relations
with the Customs Union member-states much, first of all in the economic
sense. However, it is not clear yet what Europe offers the countries
which have been invited to join the Association Agreement. The same may
be said about Russia and its Eurasian Union and Customs Union projects
too. But here potential members of these unions have an opportunity
of becoming fully-fledged members and developing almost all the game
rules themselves. As for the EU, the situation is different here,
there is still no word about the fully-fledged membership and equal
partnership. We may ride the long European pine together with the
countries of North Africa, Turkey and small Balkan counties. It is
clear that both roads will not be embraved with roses and potential
members of any integration projects will be forced to always prove
their substantiality.

Azerbaijan does its best to evade integration into any military and
political unions. CanTurkey alone ensure Azerbaijan’s security?

The vulnerability of Azerbaijan’s position is conditioned by the fact
that this country is not a member of any collective security structure,
such as NATO, SCO, CSTO. Even the contracts with a NATO member-state
Turkey do not guarantee Azerbaijan support in case of potential
conflicts. For instance, after the bellicose statements from Baku,
representatives of Ankara have repeatedly made it clear that they
are against resumption of the war in Nagorno-Karabakh and that in
case of the war resumption, Baku cannot hang hat on Turkey’s support.

At the same time, it is necessary to take into consideration the factor
that such statements were made in the conditions of the military
parity of the confronting parties, and a problem, what Turkey will
do in case of changing of the geo-political situation still remains
unsettled. Even against the background of permanent growth of the
army by Azerbaijan, it is obvious that only by its own means and
even with a help of Turkey Baku will hardly be able to neutralize
all potential threats from the south. Meanwhile, threats may appear
in the near future in the context of development of the Big Middle
East located to the south of Azerbaijan.

What are the prospects of Russia’s policy for establishing the Eurasian
Union in the post-Soviet territory by means of economic and political
pressure on the post-Soviet countries given that no other methods
are observed?

I cannot agree with the question formulation. The West asks for a
certain response from the post-Soviet states about the future direction
of their development and the nature of their future relations with
Russia. Various options are watched and their possible consequences
are discussed. They openly say that the game rules at the post-soviet
territory will change soon depending on the choice made by the former
Soviet republics. If to speak about pressure, it is the pressure
of their own responsibility for their own choice. I cannot say that
the prospects of setting up of the Eurasian Union or Customs Union
are clear and cloudless, and all their members will be happy and
rich. The same may be said about the European Union as well with
all its problems and local disagreements. Any choice has positive
and negative sides and one should take them into account when making
a choice in favor of the European or Eurasian Union. However, it is
necessary to emphasize that the situation of such a choice cannot be
normal. Moreover, that was not Moscow that initiated in Europe the
“either – or” policy.

The frozen Armenian-Turkish protocols still remain on the agenda of
the two countries’ parliaments. What geopolitical realities might
necessitate the restart of the Armenian-Turkish dialogue?

Azerbaijan’s position was just an excuse for the failure of Armenia’s
football diplomacy. Besides the Nagorno-Karabakh problem, Armenia and
Turkey have a complex of problems related to the genocide of 1915. All
this was left beyond the football diplomacy, so, no surprise it ended
in such a way. The Armenian-Turkish dialogue will be restarted only
given the wish of both sides and their mutual commitment to show a
complex approach to bilateral problems.

From: Baghdasarian

ANKARA: Azerbaijan Takes Over UNSC Term Presidency

AZERBAIJAN TAKES OVER UNSC TERM PRESIDENCY

, Turkey
Oct 1 2013

Azerbaijan’s term presidency of United Nations Security Council (UNSC)
has officially started Tuesday

World Bulletin/News Desk

Azerbaijan’s term presidency of United Nations Security Council (UNSC)
officially started Tuesday.

Azerbaijan Foreign Ministry’s spokesperson Elman Abdullayev stated
they took the term presidency from Australia on October, 1.

Solutions for Armenian-Azerbaijan conflict, Nagorno-Karabakh problem
of Azerbaijan and the Syrian issue will be prioritised during the
term presidency, Abdullayev told AA in an exclusive interview.

He reminded Azerbaijan’s Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov suggested
a top level meeting for a cooperation of UN General Assembly and
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and said they will work to
make the meeting take place.

Azerbaijan was selected on October 2011 as a temporary member for
2012-2013 period of UNSC with 155 votes.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.worldbulletin.net/?aType=haber&ArticleID=119544
www.worldbulletin.net

Prime Minister: Intensive Work Underway To Open MSU Branch In Yereva

PRIME MINISTER: INTENSIVE WORK UNDERWAY TO OPEN MSU BRANCH IN YEREVAN

A long-term program of economic cooperation until 2020 was signed
between Armenia and Russia based on the results of the sitting of the
Armenian-Russian intergovernmental commission on economic cooperation.

At the press conference held following the sitting, the commission
co-chairmen – Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan and Russian
Minister of Transport Maksim Sokolov stressed the importance of the
program, noting that the governments of two countries will implement
the projects included in the program.

The Armenian prime minister stated that bilateral trade turnover
grows year by year, currently amounting to over $1 billion.

“Bilateral cooperation has potential for deepening and expansion. In
this context, we attach importance to the signing of the long-term
cooperation program and its implementation,” Sargsyan said.

As regards the issue of Armenia’s entry into the Customs Union,
Tigran Sargsyan said his position has not changed and is in keeping
with the Russian authorities’ position.

“President Putin’s position was voiced at the meeting of the presidents
of the two countries in August of last year. It was the following:
given the fact that Armenia has no common borders with the Customs
Union, we should try to determine how Armenia can integrate into
the CU.

“The CU already has mechanisms that allow reducing transaction expenses
that result from the absence of common borders. The mechanisms
which are used today contribute to Armenia’s integration into the
CU,” Tigran Sargsyan said, adding that the decision of Armenian and
Russian presidents was made, given this fact. In his words, now the
governments of Armenia and Russia should work on the implementation
of that decision.

It was stated during the press conference that intensive work is
underway to open a branch of Moscow State University in Yerevan.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.aysor.am/en/news/2013/10/01/msu-in-erevan/

Film Review: So You Want To Be A Toastmaster?

FILM REVIEW: SO YOU WANT TO BE A TOASTMASTER?

Tuesday, October 1st, 2013

A scene from Eric Boadella’s Toastmaster

BY BEDROS AFEYAN

Might as well ask: So you want to be an adult male Armenian? For which
of us can escape the challenge of being a gregarious host, master
of ceremonies, Johnny on the spot entertainer, when called upon by
tradition, dates and events, relatives and loved ones, demanding a
prolonged chain, seemingly endless, of self-avoiding, lyrical toasts,
a troubadour’s troubled soul spilled forth with slicked back wine,
cognac, whiskey, glass half full, half empty, tug of war, that is
ours to bear for millennia, if not more?

Who can resist the reputation, real or imagined, cultivated, inflated,
dreamt or insisted on, of being wise beyond years, witty beyond words,
handsome beyond hooked noses, smallness of statures, roughness of
features and solid virility beyond stages of imbibing poisons, treated
as if aphrodisiacs and trampolines for love to flourish in all the odd
familiar places…? Who can ever have said that his last poetic toast
was worse than his first, his own words betraying a dullness of mind,
spirit, spring in his step gone loose, gone soft, gone gravy while
the meat and song dance alone beneath the lights, with nobody home?

No, no Armenian male could endure such a fate. He must at least be
able to fake it. Stand up, look bright, speak loudly, drink and bang
his empty glass. Rise above the petty jealousies and misunderstandings
and accusations and retributions that make for community itchy living,
for that moment of rhetorical cleansing and covering and shimmering
beauty to emerge under the dark cloud of fate and humorless enemies
whose existence, no one denies.

Yes, that is what it means to be a toastmaster for Armenians. It’s
serious business. It is grabbing fate by its balls and squeezing till
your voice is heard and your demands placed on the story telling of
reality granted, which reality itself has and will always reverse.

This duality or the right to take make up tests is what has kept us
going one calamity after another, one large gaping hole in our culture
after the other, tearing us apart and tearing us within, but failing
in the long run, after the ceremony is done. Glasses raised, gliding
wishes immersed in their neighbor’s bosom, wanting nothing more than
the honor of rewriting fate itself in colors red, blue and orange, with
draping damsels dancing, delicate fingers interlaced, across rivers
and brooks, where clear options are dealt and clean living upheld.

That is the Armenian way. But how does it move from village to
town, from town to city, century upon century, war, criminalized
dictatorships, empires, secret police, genocide, demonization,
rejection, constant deflation not withstanding? I tell you how. You
render sacred your one right, and one right alone. The one without
which all other bets are off. Your right to tell your story as best you
can render it, and to rejoice in the telling of it, the drinking of it,
the dancing of it, and the singing of it with brothers and sisters,
lifting glasses saying “Genats’t orGenatsnout.” To your essence,
to your state of being alive (in the singular or the plural).

To you and to you, oh, brother Armenian, lost to the mainstream of
history. Relegated to footnotes and attics, hidden compartments and
underground caverns of worship and wisdom, from Khorenatsi onward,
telling stories that mean the world to us as keys and locks and
lockets, and perhaps mean very little to the other, the odar, the
misbegotten Armenian wannabe’s, the world is surely full of.

So with bombast and fervor, with an arsenal of verbal spices and
psychological nuances, with seduction and with sermons, squeezing the
world into a question, rolled down Mt. Ararat for solid acceleration,
steam picked up through diction, we raise our glasses and empty our
fears and concussions, so that one may speak for the many and the many
may speak through the one, called the Tamada, the toast master. Part
martyr, part clown, part Jesus, part Socrates, part wine, part bread,
part salt, and always ready for one more glass, one more blessing on
the vine.

This tradition is the glue that binds the story in Toastmaster
together, a film by first time feature filmmaker, Eric Boadella of
Barcelona, now living in Venice Beach, CA, surfing and developing his
craft in the strange living multicultural, liberal, no tea party for
us, thanks, crucible that is the harbinger of the features that will
grace and define the future of all America. This happy magic land of
California. He sees Armenians and hears their plight. Lost language,
lost rights, lost souls, last prayers, regrouped in LA, prolonging
the decay, regrouped on the internet, strengthening the natural
instinct for merriment and collective serenity, denied but demanded
at each turn, at each church and school hall. Here ancient rights
and remedies are dispensed to keep a nation of floating caravans of
troubadours producing the best and the brightest, whether in chess
or violin, medicine or research in the highest echelons of perpetual
nervousness that leads to excellence in lone marches up steep hills
made steeper by a collective pain and hollow chest squeezing grins,
turned to laughter and dance in the hands of the toastmaster in
evenings that never end and never will.

In an astutely observed gem of a movie that tries far less to explain
and explore, than to sample and adore, I recommend Toastmaster to you.

It is a movie that exposes a culture’s inner sanctum and lands on its
(cultural) feet, away from the surety of fate that is the Spanish
aura, away from the sophistication of Western European traditions,
towards the native Armenian male, belonging to no land but a culture,
belonging to no police state, no army, no political corruption machine,
but to the proposition that our wit is unsurpassed, that our voice is
graced by God, that our tone is like the buttery spoils of a virtuosic
violin, that our women bewitch us, just through the power of our own
thoughts, that they bewilder us, just by the feebleness of those same
thoughts, that they beguile us till we turn into guard dogs and pets
for them to stroke and to discard, if cruel gods so demand, or take
pity on us and inflate our egos some and deflate them far more often,
thus rendering us as tough as we may endure to become and still remain
poets at heart…

Eric Boadella knows the possibility of this life-long dance played out
on-screen or off, whether in the school hall, over Armenian coffee and
fate/cup readings, or not. Whether in Kapriel himself, or that old
towering man’s memory banks, or whether in the camera of his agile
nephew, young Alek, hiding behind the viewfinder of his hand held,
hand-me-down movie camera, laughing at a world with a mere black and
white 35mm jest, a bon mot, a caress. They each have an agenda and the
most important element of each man’s agenda is to ignore the others’!

For they are men and they have mountains to climb and seas to cross.

Homer is always nearby to record the journey. Except their journey has
a muse and an angel. A marvelous stroke of genius, in the guise of a
little step sister to Alek, Mariella. She is the bonfire that truly
lights up the screen with her innocence and fractious reflections, her
bold presence and deflections of the male dance the two must engage
in, for they are animals in the wild of another man’a making. It is
Mariella that allows us into this scene and shows us that there is
a way out.

Some folks get all absorbed in the drama of others. Armenians tend
to do this too often. But Mariella is an odar. She is innocence and
shrewdness personified. She wants to have fun and to learn and to grow
and to sample and to judge, in short, to live. And to live now, today,
and not later, when she is thought to be old enough. Between a bull
of an uncle, an ex-opera singer, now drinking, cigar smoking, puffing
roaring and sleep walking. Before the young, fragile, bespectacled,
camera-bound half brother (to be) whose mother will soon many her
father and yet, here they are in the home of the wedding-uninvited
uncle, learning about the skills and rituals of becoming a toastmaster,
with the passing of the traditional horn-shaped wine cup, brought from
the old country, the generation to generation bounty of belonging,
of being an Armenian in this world of the other, the odar, amidst
assimilation leading temptations aplenty.

But of course, you must ask, can one “become” a toastmaster or an
Armenian for that matter? Must you not be born that way? Born to
become that which is inevitable but that which you can only fathom,
if you think you have free will and full say in the matter, and thus
fool yourself into submission to this thankless fate?

The answer is always yes. Yes, yes, yes, uncle Kapriel, I will make
movies that trivialize you, and trivialize me, and shred away the veils
and vagueries that stop us from trusting one another enough to open up
and embrace our fears and ignorance-driven uneven keels. But through
drink and tradition, wit and exposition, music and the belief in the
story surviving through a culture which is less able to control its
physical fate than the richness of the stories of that culture itself
that lives within us and through us and shines through our eyelids
and out our ears into the echo of the world where it is heard in
dreams and screams and howls of dead bones and blood spilled for the
beast that sees no merit in this tarantella we call Armenian spirit,
our stories, our hymns.

Eric Boadella as writer and director, David Hovan as Kapriel, Sevag
Mahserejian as the young filmmaker Alek, and the wisdom of an angel
packed in a compact serenade, Mariella, played to perfection by Kali
Flanagan, is an ensemble to be congratulated for having engulfed a
tattering storm of stories and made a quiet poem of it, as bright as
daylight and as somber as peaceful night after the toastmaster has
said a final, half-serious, goodbye.

From: Baghdasarian

http://asbarez.com/114566/film-review-so-you-want-to-be-a-toastmaster/

Easy Money: Implications Of Armenia’s Recent Sovereign Bond Issuance

EASY MONEY: IMPLICATIONS OF ARMENIA’S RECENT SOVEREIGN BOND ISSUANCE

11:38, October 1, 2013

On Thursday, September 19, 2013, Armenia issued its first sovereign
US$-denominated bond and joined Bolivia, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda,
Mongolia, and a handful of other (mostly low-income) countries that
within the past year or so entered the international market for the
first time.

Armenia’s bond issue had the following characteristics: it had a size
of US$700 million; a repayment period of 7 years; carried a coupon of
6 percent annually; and was sold below the asking price, yielding a
total of 6.25 percent per year for investors, if they hold the bond
to maturity.

The issue is rumored to be nicknamed “Kardashian”, after the famous
US TV personalities, the Kardashian family. In should be noted that
Armenia’s credit rating is in “junk” (i.e., non-investment/speculative)
territory, as per both Moody’s (Ba2) and Fitch (BB-) rating
agencies. Finally, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, and J.P.

Morgan Chase-the banks, which helped close the deal-were paid an
estimated US$5 million for this transaction.

What is behind this move by the government of Armenia and what would
be the relevant criteria for evaluating such a step?

The use of the proceeds raised by selling the bond is perhaps the
most important criteria for judging the effectiveness in all such
cases. As we indicated in “Armenia: Avoiding an Economic Catastrophe”,
Armenia has to repay US$1 billion until the end of 2014, most of which
to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). However, according to a
recent IMF statement, Armenia may get a new loan from that financial
institution, which will enable its government to roll over the debt
payments falling due.

The second portion of government’s debt coming due is owed to Russia.

Although it is unclear whether Armenia’s (disastrous) commitment
to join the Russia-led Customs Union will have any implications on
the debt servicing, it is entirely conceivable that the portion of
Armenia’s debt owed to Russia too will get rolled over because of
that commitment. Should this be the case, the Armenian government
will have the entire US$700 million to spend as it pleases!

There are several reasons why issuing this bond now was a very bad
idea from the country’s and its average citizen’s perspective:

First, much like in 2009, the government of Armenia has no
developmental plan to speak of, and is likely to spend the proceeds
of the bond on boosting current expenditures, such as, increasing
pensions and salaries and providing a subsidy for imported Russian
gas. Both of these expenditure categories will help ease the social
tension in the country and thus help the Sargsyan regime delay the
unavoidable. These expenditures will not, however, result in job
creation or investment and could therefore be viewed as wasteful.

Second, given the extent of budgetary leaks in Armenia (see PFA’s
estimates contained in our Diaspora Report, on page 34), this will
be a lucrative opportunity for top-level officials to become even
wealthier. Once the US$700 million are deposited at the Central Bank
(CBA) and in return the dram-denominated equivalent of that money is
deposited at the government’s account at the CBA, this becomes like
any other government revenue, subject to the same corrupt “ways and
means”. An estimated 20-30 percent of these funds will eventually be
embezzled through various procurement malpractices and other loopholes
employed by the Armenian government.

Third, unless used to repay existing debt coming due, this bond
issuance adds an additional 8 percent of GDP to Armenia’s public debt
and requires payments of US$42 million in interest cost per year, for
7 years in a row. Since the interest paid on this bond is much higher
than that presently accrued on Armenia’s debt (much of which is still
on concessional terms due to Armenia’s low per capita income), the
bond deal increases the country’s debt burden disproportionately and
brings Armenia one large step closer to debt distress. It is partially
for these reasons that following the announcement of the Armenian bond
issue Moody’s lowered its foreign-currency bond ceiling on Armenia.

Fourth, in practice most of these large sovereign bonds are never
repaid-once issued (and the money is spent!) they are rolled over,
perpetuating the country’s debt overhang. When the time comes to
roll over this particular bond in 7 years, chances are the global
economy will be at its peak (or thereabouts) with interest rates
being much higher than now, potentially costing the country a lot
more than 6.25 percent to issue a new bond. In the meantime, once
the international rates start going up (expected to happen beginning
early-2014), the Armenian bond will trade down (this is a feature of
bonds with a fixed-rate coupon to lose value when interest rates go
up), selling below the initial face value.

Fifth, while the timing is indeed opportune (given that the
global conditions have softened following the US Federal Reserve’s
announcement to leave its unconventional monetary policy unchanged),
this deal will not have the benefits that most first-time sovereign
bond issues carry. One of the mains reasons behind these sovereign
bond issues is to act as benchmarks against which the local (in
this case, Armenian) companies could issue bonds in capital markets
(both international and domestic). Clearly, with the outlook for the
Armenian economy looking increasingly gloomy, there is likely to be
very little, if any, appetite from the private sector companies to
issue bonds any time soon. Therefore, what could have been a useful
guide for the private sector in better times will get mostly ignored
and its potential benefits wasted.

But perhaps the most important reason why it is a bad idea for this
government to have all this money is because it will undoubtedly
reduce their incentive to reform and take the economy out of the
dire situation it is in. As any other easy money (or what the famous
Harvard economist of the 1980s, Janos Kornai, would call soft budget
constraint), this bond will buy them time and reduce their incentives
to search for solutions to problems facing the economy (Not that they
had those incentives to begin with, but still).

We wonder if the Kardashian family would still be pleased to have
their name associated with this bond, if they knew about all of this.

We will keep our views on this one to ourselves!

Is there a silver lining in all of this, you may ask? Unfortunately,
none, especially if our conjecture regarding the use of the bond money
(as outlined above) becomes true.

pfarmenia.wordpress.com

From: Baghdasarian

http://hetq.am/eng/articles/29744/easy-money-implications-of-armenia%E2%80%99s-recent-sovereign-bond-issuance.html

Turquie/Proces KCK : Deniz Zarakolu Reste En Prison

TURQUIE/PROCES KCK : DENIZ ZARAKOLU RESTE EN PRISON

Publié le : 30-09-2013

Info Collectif VAN – – Le procès ubuesque du
KCK (Koma Civaken Kurdistan) a commencé en Turquie en 2009 avec de
nombreuses arrestations de maires et d’élus du BDP (le Parti kurde
pour la Paix et la Démocratie), puis celles de militants associatifs,
d’étudiants, d’avocats, de journalistes et d’écrivains. D’avril
2009 a octobre 2011, 7748 personnes ont été arrêtées dans ce
cadre. La 44ème audience de ce procès-fleuve vient de se clôturer
a Silivri (a 60 kms d’Istanbul) mais, malgré les espoirs de leurs
proches, aucun des auteurs des Editions Belge n’a été libéré :
une grande déception donc pour Deniz Zarakolu, Ayse Berktay et
Dursun Yildiz. Rappelons que le fils de l’éditeur Ragıp Zarakolu,
Deniz Zarakolu, est sous les verrous depuis le 4 octobre 2011 pour ”
terrorisme ”. Son crime ? Avoir donné une conférence sur l’ouvrage
”La philosophie ” d’Aristote dans l’Académie du BDP… De fait,
toute personne ayant un lien avec ce parti, pourtant légal, court le
risque d’être détenue. Mais le cas de Deniz est particulier : en le
maintenant en prison, le pouvoir espère museler son père, Ragıp
Zarakolu, opposant et militant turc bien connu pour les ouvrages
qu’il publie sur le génocide arménien. La prochaine audience se
tiendra du 1er au 10 octobre 2013 et une nouvelle décision devrait
être rendue au terme de celle-ci. Le Collectif VAN vous propose la
traduction d’un article en turc, paru sur le site haberler.com le 20
septembre 2013. Faut-il s’en étonner ? Le site présente le KCK ”
comme la structure chapeautant l’organisation terroriste PKK ”…

Haberler.com

Le procès “KCK” a Istanbul

20 septembre 2013

Au titre de l’enquête du KCK [Nota CVAN : Koma Civaken Kurdistan, le
groupe de société Kurdistan], la structure chapeautant l’organisation
terroriste PKK, la 44ème audience du procès a débuté, a propos
de 97 détenus et de 205 accusés.

L’audience a eu lieu dans une grande salle en dehors du campus des
établissements pénitentiaires de Silivri dans la Cour pénale
d’Istanbul. Les 95 détenus dont Mustafa Avcı, l’ancien président
du BDP de la ville d’Istanbul, et Cihan Deniz Zarakolu, le fils de
l’écrivain Ragıp Zarakolu, y ont assisté. 19 accusés dont la
Professeure BuÅ~_ra Ersanlı ont également participé a l’audience.

Un interprète kurde choisi dans la liste de la Commission Judiciaire
se trouvait aussi dans la salle d’audience.

Le président de la cour, Ali Alcık, a interrogé l’accusé Erman
Ergin sur les revendications le concernant.

Le président Alcık a posé la question suivante a Erman Ergin : ”
Dans le dossier, il y a un texte dont le titre est ”Mon autocritique
”. De quoi s’agit-il ? ”. M.Ergin a dit que c’était la lettre de
démission pour quitter le parti BDP [Nota CVAN : Le Parti kurde pour
la Paix et la Démocratie].

Par la suite, le président Alcık a parlé ainsi : ” Quel est votre
but d’écrire un article d’autocritique ? Si vous démissionniez,
vous écririez que vous voudriez démissionner. Une autocritique est
généralement écrite par les organisations. ”

M.Ergin a dit alors: ” Je ne connaissais pas du tout la Charte du
parti. Les amis m’ont dit que je devrais écrire en détail pourquoi
je démissionnais. Voici les comptes rendus. Comme je ne connaissais
pas la méthode, j’ai écrit de cette manière. ”

Le président Alcık a affirmé ceci : ” Il y a des informations
importantes concernant vos amis avec qui vous avez travaillé dans
le parti. Si vous écriviez qu’ils n’effectuaient pas leur tâche,
ceci pourrait être compréhensible. Alors que, par nom, vous donnez
des informations privées sur leur personnalité. Dans ce texte,
les personnalités sont analysées. Ce que vous avez fait est une
sorte d’étiquetage. ” Puis, M.Ergin a répondu : ” Je l’ai écrit
pour indiquer que j’étais dans une situation difficile car ils ne
faisaient pas leurs taches. ”

L’audience continue avec la défense du détenu Faruk Sanık.

Nota CVAN :

Selon le média Haber7, durant la 43eme audience, une des détenues,
Hulya Yer, s’est exprimée en ces termes : ” L’histoire dit que
l’endroit où le système blesse l’Homme devient son identité. Moi, je
suis la avec mon identité féminine, kurde, alevi. Depuis deux ans, je
suis emprisonnée. Je pense que j’ai été arrêtée en raison de mes
3 identités. Je n’ai jamais baissé la tête devant l’injustice et la
persécution. Je n’ai obéi a personne. C’est pourquoi j’ai été tout
le temps confrontée aux complots, au génocide et a l’assimilation. ”

©Traduction Traduction du turc : NA.T. pour le Collectif VAN –
30 septembre 2013 –

Source originale:

Titre original: “İstanbul’daki KCK davası ”

Lire aussi :

Liberté pour Ragip Zarakolu : Dossier complet

Retour a la rubrique

Source/Lien : Haberler.com

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.collectifvan.org/article.php?r=0&id=75875
http://www.haberler.com/istanbul-daki-kck-davasi-5084457-haberi/
www.collectifvan.org
www.collectifvan.org

Un Ex-Officiel Arrete Lors D’une Enquete Pour Corruption

UN EX-OFFICIEL ARRETE LORS D’UNE ENQUETE POUR CORRUPTION

ARMENIE

Un ancien fonctionnaire du gouvernement provincial a ete arrete sur
des accusations de detournement de fonds que certains observateurs
considèrent comme un geste du gouvernement contre le president du
parlement Hovik Abrahamian.

Le Service special d’investigation (SIS) a annonce mercredi soir
que Tigran Virabian, l’ancien chef du departement de l’agriculture
de la province meridionale de l’Ararat, a conspire avec plusieurs
autres personnes afin de detourner de grandes quantites de carburant
subventionne par le gouvernement distribues aux agriculteurs locaux.

La declaration du SIS n’a pas nomme ces personnes ou preciser l’ampleur
du detournement de fonds presume.

Les fonctionnaires de l’administration provinciale ont ete prudents en
commentant l’affaire. Karlen Hakobian, vice-gouverneur de l’Ararat,
a salue Virabian comme un homme ” diligent ” qui a servi la region
depuis plus d’une decennie. Karlen Hakobian a egalement insiste sur
le fait que les autorites de l’Ararat surveillent etroitement la
distribution de carburant afin d’eviter d’eventuelles pratiques de
corruption parmi les fonctionnaires locaux.

Il n’etait pas clair si oui ou non Tigran Virabian va plaider coupable
face a l’accusation. Sa maison dans Artashat capitale de la province
semblait vide jeudi.

Tigran Virabian, qui a demissionne de son poste a la fin mai, a
provoque l’indignation quand il a intimide et insulte une electrice
ainsi qu’un observateur independant lors de l’election presidentielle
de fevrier 2013. Il etait le president d’une commission electorale de
la circonscription dans Artashat representant le Parti republicain au
pouvoir (HHK). Les raisons de la demission de Virabian restent floues.

Son arrestation intervient deux semaines après le ministère des
Finances armenien ait affirme avoir decouvert, lors d’une inspection
dans tout le pays, de graves abus dans le système de carburant concu
pour aider les agriculteurs a travers le pays. Il a enumere les
villages de l’Ararat touchees par la corruption presumee. Parmi eux
se trouvait Mkhchian, un village près de Artashat qui est le lieu de
residence du president du parlement Hovik Abrahamian et de sa famille
elargie sevissant dans la region.

Un communique du ministère des finances a note que plus de 40 tonnes
de carburant diesel ont ete distribues aux parents d’Abrahamian. Mais
il n’a pas dit où une partie de cette aide a ete detourne.

Cette declaration intervient peu de temps après que la Chambre de
contrôle subordonnee au parlement ait pretendu que des detournements
graves des fonds budgetaires dans les marches publics geres par divers
organismes gouvernementaux ont eu lieu. Hovik Abrahamian a ajoute sa
voix aux allegations avant qu’ils ne soient rejetes par le President
Serge Sarkissian et le Premier ministre Tigran Sarkissian. Le president
a signale sa forte desapprobation du comportement du president du
parlement. Hovik Abrahamian aurait une relation tendue avec Tigran
Sarkissian.

La direction du HHK au pouvoir a discute de la question la semaine
dernière lors d’une reunion presidee par Serge Sarkissian. Hovik
Abrahamian a insiste après la rencontre qu’il n’avait pas ete censure
par le parti.

mardi 1er octobre 2013, Stephane ©armenews.com

From: Baghdasarian

Un Nouvel Organisme D’application De La Loi

UN NOUVEL ORGANISME D’APPLICATION DE LA LOI

ARMENIE

Le president Serge Sarkissian a demande la mise en place d’une nouvelle
et puissante agence application de la loi qui sera charge de mener
des enquetes criminelles.

Le bureau de presse de Serge Sarkissian a indique que ” l’organisme
d’enquete unifie ” reunira des divisions correspondantes de la police
d’Armenie, du ministère de la Defense et du Comite des recettes
de l’Etat (SRC). Il a declare dans un communique que ce changement
structurel vise a accroître l’efficacite des enquetes sur les divers
crimes et l’independance des officiers conduisant les enquetes.

La declaration ne fait aucune reference au Service national de
securite (SNS), l’ancienne branche armenienne du KGB sovietique,
ainsi qu’au Service Special d’Investigation (SIS), ce qui suggère
qu’ils ne seront pas integres dans la nouvelle agence. Le SIS est
subordonnee aux procureurs et est charge d’enqueter sur les crimes
commis par des agents de l’Etat et les violations electorales.

La declaration a egalement annonce que Serge Sarkissian a forme
une commission ad hoc qui sera charge de rediger de nouvelles lois
et amendements juridiques necessaires a la creation de la nouvelle
agence de securite. La commission est dirigee par l’ancien Procureur
general Aghvan Hovsepian.

Galust Sahakian, un vice-president du Parti republicain au pouvoir
d’Armenie (HHK), a declare que Aghvan Hovsepian, qui a demissionne
en tant que procureur general, il y a moins de deux semaines, est
egalement susceptible d’etre nomme a la tete du nouveau organisme.

Galust Sahakian a souligne ” l’experience precieuse ” de Hovsepian
quant a l’application de la loi.

Zaruhi Postanjian, ancien procureur, qui est maintenant depute au
parlement representant le parti Zharangutyun (Heritage), a ecarte
la justification officielle pour la restructuration de l’appareil
de securite armenien. ” Tout initiative de Serge Sarkissian vise
a prolonger et renforcer son règne ” a-t-elle declare au service
armenien de RFE / RL (Azatutyun.am).

mardi 1er octobre 2013, Stephane ©armenews.com

From: Baghdasarian

L’Affaire Zirve : Une Clef Pour Les Affaires Du Journaliste Armenien

L’AFFAIRE ZIRVE : UNE CLEF POUR LES AFFAIRES DU JOURNALISTE ARMENIEN DE TURQUIE HRANT DINK ET DU FRERE SANTORO, SELON UN AVOCAT

TURQUIE

ISTANBUL – Hurriyet Daily News

Vercihan Ziflioglu

Une fois la lumière faite dans l’affaire de la maison d’edition
Zirve, beaucoup d’autres crimes de ces soixante dernières annees,
dont l’affaire du journaliste Hrant Dink et celle du Frère Andrea
Santoro, seront elles aussi elucidees, selon l’avocat de Zirve.

L’elucidation des assassinats du passe recent de Turquie mettra en
lumière les points clefs de l’etat profond, selon Erdal Dogan, l’avocat
de la maison d’edition de Malatya Zirve et de l’affaire Hrant Dink.

Dogan, qui etait aussi, jusqu’a un passe recent, avocat dans l’affaire
Hrant Dink, a dit a Hurriyet Daily News que le procès de la maison
d’edition Zirve etait une affaire clef qui revelerait les soixante
dernières annees d’etat profond de Turquie.

” Lorsque le procès de la maison d’edition Zirve sera acheve, l’image
des soixante annees ecoulees apparaîtra. On verra clairement ce
dont les gouvernements ont ete capables, comment ont s’est joue des
organisations ethniques, et la facon dont la propagande psychologique
a ete faite ” a-t-il dit.

Trois missionnaires, un Allemand, Tillman Geske, et deux Turcs,
Necati Aydin et Ugur Yuksel, avaient ete ligotes et tortures avant
d’etre egorges dans les locaux de la maison d’edition Zirve, une
publication chretienne de Malatya, le 18 avril 2007. Avant cette
agression, le Frère Andrea Santoro avait ete abattu le 5 fevrier 2007,
alors qu’il etait en prières dans son eglise de Trebizonde, sur la Mer
Noire. En outre, le journaliste armenien Hrant Dink avait ete abattu
le 19 janvier 2007, devant l’immeuble du quotidien armeno-turc Agos,
dont il etait redacteur en chef.

Dogan a ajoute que dans le procès Zirve, le dernier acte d’accusation
montrait clairement la structure cellulaire du groupe d’action
Ergenekon, ajoutant que dans ce complot, ce sont les Chretiens – les
Armeniens principalement – qui etaient cibles.” La structure qui a
commis les assassinats de Zirve est la meme que celle qui a commis
les assassinats de Dink et de Santoro. Le gouvernement est vise,
et c’est le chaos qui est recherche “, a-t-il dit.

Dogan soutient que toutes ses affaires ont des liens avec le
Departement Special de Guerre, qui participa egalement aux emeutes
anti-grecques d’Istanbul, les 6 et 7 septembre 1955.

” La structure de 1955 a ete reconstituee dans les annees 1990, et une
structure a ete formee au sein du Commandement des Forces Speciales.

Nous avons parle de la structure denommee Departement de la Strategie
Nationale et de la Guerre (TUSHAD), qui apparaît en clair dans les
pièces du procès des assassinats de Zirve “, a dit Dogan.

Forces ‘ noir et blanc ‘

Il a egalement soutenu que l’Etat-major turc avait approuve l’existence
de ces forces ‘ noir et blanc ‘. ” Il s’avère que les blancs sont
des personnalites civiles et ils designent des cibles en usant de la
desinformation “, a-t-il dit.

Le general a la retraite Hursit Tolon et l’ancien Commandant du
Regiment de Gendarmerie de Malatya Mehmet Ulger, tous deux condamnes
dans le recent procès du coup d’etat Ergenekon, ont egalement ete mis
en cause comme suspects dans l’affaire des assassinats de Zirve. En
outre, le tribunal designe pour cette affaire a demande que les
dossiers des affaires Ergenekon, Balyoz, JITEM et Musa Anter lui
soient transmis.

Lorsqu’on lui a demande si le gouvernement pourrait etre tenu comme
responsable dans ces assassinats, Dogan a repondu que le gouvernement,
ayant signe en 2003 la decision Conseil National de Securite, qui
considerait l’action des missionnaires comme une menace, pourrait
etre tenu responsable.

Il a dit que suffisamment d’elan pourrait ne pas etre donne a l’affaire
Dink, etant donnee la masse des desinformations apportees.

Dogan a soutenu que la 14ème Haute Chambre Criminelle, chargee
de l’affaire, avait rendu son jugement dès le debut du procès en
affirmant qu’aucune organisation ne se trouvait derrière l’assassinat.

Il a egalement declare que la 9ème chambre criminelle de la Cour
d’Appel Supreme avait ” signe l’arret de mort de Dink ” en lui faisant
ostensiblement un procès pour violation de l’article 301 du code penal
turc. ” Ni l’un, ni l’autre de ces tribunaux n’est par consequent
objectif et independant “, nous a dit Dogan.

20 septembre 2013

Traduction Gilbert Beguian

mardi 1er octobre 2013, Stephane ©armenews.com

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=93469