60 millions de drams alloués par le gouvernement arménien pour la no

ARMENIE
60 millions de drams alloués par le gouvernement arménien pour la
notation des écoles secondaires et des universités

Le gouvernement arménien a alloué 60 millions de drams pour la mise en
`uvre du projet pilote du ministère de l’éducation de notation des
écoles secondaires et les universités du pays. Le ministère a lancé ce
projet cette année.

« En fait, nous avons lancé pour la première fois un système qui
permettra de stimuler la concurrence entre les établissements
d’enseignement supérieur », a déclaré le Premier ministre Tigran
Sarkissian. « Dans deux ans, les entreprises privées auront la
possibilité de participer à la notation des établissements
d’enseignement. Le ministère doit contrôler ce processus afin de
s’assurer de l’impartialité de l’information car la notation va
déclencher beaucoup d’enthousiasme ».

Le premier ministre a dit que le temps est venu de supprimer les
responsables gouvernementaux des conseils d’administration des
établissements d’enseignement supérieur sinon il sera très difficile
d’atteindre la conformité aux normes internationales.

La méthodologie d’évaluation a été mis au point par les spécialistes
du ministère de l’éducation, qui évalueront les écoles arméniennes et
les universités cette année, mais dans les prochaines années, si le
projet pilote est un succès, cette obligation pourrait être remise à
une société privée qui bénéficiera de la confiance du public.

Quelques 1435 écoles secondaires et 65 établissements d’enseignement
supérieur, dont 23 appartiennent à l’État sont ne fonctionnement en
Arménie.

mardi 7 janvier 2014,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

From: Baghdasarian

CV Church: "Armenian Archives in the Middle East on the Armenian Gen

Armenian Apostolic Church of Crescenta Valley – Educational Committee
6252 Honolulu Ave.
Lacrescenta, CA. 91214
Tel: 818-244-9645
E-mail: [email protected]

Dr. Vahram Shemmassian will be the guest speaker on the subject of
“Armenian Archives in the Middle East on the Armenian Genocide” at the
Armenian Apostolic Church of Crescenta Valley, located at Western
Prelacy’s “Dikran and Zarouhi Der Ghazarian” Hall, at 6252 Honolulu
Ave., La Crescenta, California on Sunday, January 19, 2014 at 1pm,
following the Divine liturgy, which starts at 11am.

On the eve of the Armenian Genocide centenary, a bevy of activities
are being planned around the world. In this vein, one of the most
important activities must be a serious examination of the status of
the pertinent Armenian archives in Armenia and in the Diaspora and
their indispensability in the pursuit of Armenian Genocide
recognition, culminating in restitution.

This lecture will focus on one major geographical area where Armenian
Genocide archives are to be found – the Middle East. The aim is to
make the public aware of the existence and significance of those
holdings, and emphasize the urgency of their preservation and
utilization. The following archives will be surveyed: those of the
Armenian Prelacy in Cairo; the Armenian General Benevolent Union
(AGBU) in Cairo; The Armenian Patriarchate in Jerusalem; the Armenian
Catholicosate of Cilicia in Antelias; and the Armenian Prelacy in
Aleppo. Armenian Genocide archives elsewhere in the Diaspora will also
be mentioned.

Dr. Vahram Shemmassian is Associate Professor and Director of the
Armenian Studies Program in the Department of Modern and Classical
Languages and Literatures at the California State University,
Northridge. He holds a Ph.D. in History from the University of
California, Los Angeles (UCLA). His dissertation is titled “The
Armenian Villagers of Musa Dagh: A Historical-Ethnographic Study,
1840-1915.”

DR. Shemmassian has conducted extensive research in thirty-five
governmental and non-governmental archives in the United States,
Europe, the Middle East, and Armenia, gathering data on such areas of
interest as the Armenians of Musa Dagh and Armenian Genocide survivors
in the Middle East at the end of World War I. He has published many
scholarly articles, delivered lectures at community events and in
universities, and participated in international symposia and
conferences.

Dr. Shemmassian’s latest article, published in the 2012 issue of the
Journal of the Society for Armenian Studies, deals with the “Armenian
Genocide Survivors in the Holy Land at the End of World War I.” He is
currently completing a book, titled “The Musa Dagh Armenians: A
Socioeconomic and Cultural History, 1919-1939”.

In the summer of 2010, the Ministry of Diaspora of the Republic of
Armenia awarded Dr. Shemmassian the “William Saroyan Medal” for his
contributions to the promotion and preservation of Armenian culture in
the Diaspora.

This event, which is organized by Crescenta Valley Church Education
Committee, is free and open to the public.

From: Baghdasarian

ANKARA: Two Suspects In Dink Trial Sent To Court Following Arrest Or

TWO SUSPECTS IN DINK TRIAL SENT TO COURT FOLLOWING ARREST ORDER

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Jan 7 2014

7 January 2014 /İSTANBUL, TODAY’S ZAMAN

A court ordered the arrest of two suspects in the trial of the murder
of Hrant Dink — the late editor-in-chief of the Turkish-Armenian
weekly Agos who was shot dead in 2007 by an ultranationalist teenager
outside the offices of his newspaper in İstanbul — following their
absence from a hearing held on Tuesday and two suspects, Zeynel Abidin
Yavuz and Osman Hayal have been found and arrested in Trabzon province.

Following the Supreme Court of Appeals’ reversing the ruling handed
down in Dink trial in which 18 suspects are being tried, the İstanbul
14th High Criminal Court resumed hearing the case. When two defendants,
Osman Hayal and Zeynel Abidin Yavuz, failed to show up for the hearing,
the court ordered their arrest. Yavuz and Hayal were detained in
Trabzon and sent to court shortly after their arrest was ordered.

The Supreme Court of Appeals overturned a lower court ruling that
dismissed the existence of an organized criminal network in the case.

The lower court, which found no evidence that a terrorist organization
was involved in the Jan. 19, 2007 assassination of Dink by teenager
Ogun Samast, had acquitted the suspects of forming a terrorist
organization, but it said they were guilty of forming an illegal
and armed organization to commit a crime as prohibited under Turkish
Penal Code (TCK) Article 220.

The lawyer for the Dink family had previously argued that an
ultranationalist organization was established in 2004 by Yasin Hayal
consisting of several people including Dink case suspect Erhan Tuncel,
and this group’s anger at Dink, who was put on trial after being
accused of “insulting Turkishness,” led them to plot to punish him.

Sixteen out of 18 suspects have been released pending trial and
two of the suspects incarcerated. One of the two prisoners, Tuncel,
arrested by the court in October, has complained about his lengthy
detention period and requested his release.

The lawyer of Tuncel, noting that his defendant is not to be blamed
for the extended trial period, on Tuesday said: “The decision on
whether to obey to the Supreme Court of Appeals’ reversal of the
ruling has not been reached yet. My client was arrested though his
acquittal was ordered once. If the court which is currently hearing
the case abides by the [overturning of the lower court’s] decision
[to acquit] by the Supreme Court of Appeals, and so it seems it will,
the longest the trial can last will be five years. The prolonging of
the trial should not result in my client’s unjust treatment. He was
released for two years and didn’t make any attempt to escape.”

Dink’s family lawyer, Fethiye Cetin, stated that the trial needed to be
“restructured.”

Cetin, highlighting the significance of the ongoing graft operation
that has been occupying Turkey’s agenda since it broke on Dec. 17,
said: “What this country has been going through in a way confirms what
we have constantly said since the beginning. Some state officials
are allegedly fabricating evidence. Taking that into consideration,
all of our demands should be fulfilled again and the file has to
be re-assessed.”

Dink’s friends and family gathered in front of the courthouse on
Tuesday to protest against the seven-year failure to bring the trial
to a conclusion.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-336031-two-suspects-in-dink-trial-sent-to-court-following-arrest-order.html

ANKARA: Court Orders Arrest Of Two Suspects In Dink Trial

COURT ORDERS ARREST OF TWO SUSPECTS IN DINK TRIAL

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Jan 7 2014

7 January 2014 /TODAYSZAMAN.COM, İSTANBUL

A court has ordered the arrest of two suspects in the trial of
the murder of Hrant Dink — the late editor-in-chief of the
Turkish-Armenian weekly Agos who was shot dead in 2007 by an
ultranationalist teenager outside the offices of his newspaper in
İstanbul — following their absence from a hearing held on Tuesday.

Following the Supreme Court of Appeals’ reversing the ruling handed
down in Dink trial in which 18 suspects are being tried, the İstanbul
14th High Criminal Court resumed hearing the case. When two defendants,
Osman Hayal and Zeynel Abidin, failed to show up for the hearing,
the court ordered their arrest.

The Supreme Court of Appeals overturned a lower court ruling that
dismissed the existence of an organized criminal network in the case.

The lower court, which found no evidence that a terrorist organization
was involved in the Jan. 19, 2007 assassination of Dink by teenager
Ogun Samast, had acquitted the suspects of forming a terrorist
organization, but it said they were guilty of forming an illegal
and armed organization to commit a crime as prohibited under Turkish
Penal Code (TCK) Article 220.

The lawyer for the Dink family had previously argued that an
ultranationalist organization was established in 2004 by Yasin Hayal
consisting of several people including Dink case suspect Erhan Tuncel,
and this group’s anger at Dink, who was put on trial after being
accused of “insulting Turkishness,” led them to plot to punish him.

Sixteen out of 18 suspects have been released pending trial and
two of the suspects incarcerated. One of the two prisoners, Tuncel,
arrested by the court in October, has complained about his lengthy
detention period and requested his release.

The lawyer of Dink’s family, Fethiye Cetin, stated that the trial
needed to be “restructured.”

Dink’s friends and family gathered in front of the courthouse on
Tuesday to protest against the seven-year failure to bring the trial
to a conclusion.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-335969-court-orders-arrest-of-two-suspects-in-dink-trial.html

Contest For Passenger Transportation Companies Due In Yerevan In Feb

CONTEST FOR PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION COMPANIES DUE IN YEREVAN IN FEBRUARY

16:38 07/01/2014 ” SOCIETY

Yerevan Municipality is announcing a new contest for passenger
transportation companies in the capital, to operate in around
three dozen bus (microbus) routes, the official website of Yerevan
Municipality reports.

The contest is due to take place on February 14. The deadline for
applications is February 6, 18:00.

Source: Panorama.am

From: Baghdasarian

President Sargsyan attends Christmas liturgy at the Mother See

President Sargsyan attends Christmas liturgy at the Mother See

14:01 06.01.2014

Today, President Serzh Sargsyan and Mrs. Rita Sargsyan attended the
liturgy at the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin dedicated to the Feast
of the Holy Nativity and Theophany of Our Lord Jesus Christ,
President’s Press Office reported.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.armradio.am/en/2014/01/06/president-sargsyan-attends-christmas-liturgy-at-the-mother-see/

ISTANBUL: Being an Armenian in the capital of the bureaucracy (2)

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Jan 6 2014

Being an Armenian in the capital of the bureaucracy (2)

A view of a pre-1915 Ulus, Ankara
6 January 2014 /EMÝNE DOLMACI, ANKARA

Picking up where I left off yesterday, I will share information on a
new book by the Hrant Dink Foundation titled, “Sessizliðin Sesi 3,
Ankaralý Ermeniler Konuþuyor” (Sounds of Silence 3, Armenians of
Ankara Speak), which sheds light on Turkish-Armenians’ socio-cultural
lives in Ankara.

The book comprises interviews conducted with Turkish- Armenians living
in Ankara. Ferda Balancar, who directed the group conducting these
interviews with Turkish-Armenians in Ankara, answers some questions.

What do they [Armenians] demand in order to confront the past?

First of all, they demand a sincere and heartfelt apology. They want
Turkish people to understand the sorrows Armenians have gone through
not only during the 1915 incidents, but also during the nation-state
process, without blaming each other.

What are their expectations of the future compared to other Turkish citizens?

In fact, they do not have different demands. They want to live in a
democratic country that respects human rights. They think they would
have a more comfortable and happy life in such a country.

Considering the current development level in the country in terms of
human rights and freedoms, do they feel secure?

They are also aware of the fact that Turkey has made great progress in
terms of fundamental rights and freedoms in recent years, but they do
not feel secure. Because they are concerned that everything may be
reversed.

One of the Armenians you interviewed indicated the declining
population of Armenians in Turkey and said, “We are only a few people.
What will happen 70 years later?” Do you have an answer for this
question?

The Armenian population in Turkey is about 70,000 or 80,000. If they
continue to have mixed marriages and migrate abroad, there will not be
an Armenian community in 50 years.

Some of the witnesses interviewed for the book share their sentiments
on being an Armenian in Turkey’s capital.

Witness 1: ‘I never liked the sense of belonging’

I would have gone both to the Political Science Faculty and the School
of Press and Broadcasting at Ankara University. But I did not want to
go into political science because I thought that I would never be an
ambassador, governor or bureaucrat because of my Armenian identity. If
you are an Armenian, the system allocates a very small space for you.
In 1968, when the street skirmishes between rightist and leftist
groups were fueled, I went to the School of Press and Broadcasting at
Ankara University. I never got involved in the clashes between
rightist and leftist groups, because for both sides, I was irrelevant.
And no one wanted to lure me to their sides. I have never liked the
sense of belonging. I have never developed a sense of belonging to any
group.

Witness 2: ‘Hrant Dink was expressing my feelings’

Hrant Dink wanted to live as a Turkish-Armenian and serve his country.
He was expressing my feelings as well. Hrant Dink had a huge influence
on me. On the day when I learned that he died, I was devastated. Will
I be a Turk when I say I am a Turk? A person cannot change their
ethnicity, but I am a good person from Turkey. I carried the Turkish
flag and read the right poem on Turkish national days. I get emotional
when I hear our national anthem or see our flag. But I do not want to
see flags and Atatürk posters everywhere. I am ready and already doing
my best to unite the common denominators of being from Turkey and
working the for the sake of this country.

Witness 3: ‘I want to live like a first-class citizen of this country’

My uncle fell in love with a Greek girl. They ran away together and
settled in the US. They had five daughters. He opened a tailor’s shop
and he was earning good money. They had a good life. Both my uncle and
his wife passed away five or six years ago. Although he had good life,
he always used to say: “I wish hadn’t left my country.” He went to the
US, and had a more comfortable life, but he always longed for these
lands. I do not want to be like my uncle. I want to live in this
country as a first-class and equal citizen.

Witness 4: ‘I teach Turkish to my grandchildren in Austria’

When I was a member of the Social Democratic Party of Austria, the
secretary-general of the party asked me if I had been oppressed while
living in Turkey because of my Armenian ethnicity. This was the first
time I understood discrimination. I told her I had never been
discriminated against, which was the truth. I am an Armenian, but I am
from Turkey. I love our country. Although I have now lived in Austria
since 1979, I follow every development in Turkey, and I teach Turkish
to my grandchildren in Austria.

Witness 5: ‘An era has ended and a new era has started’

What has changed so that we can discuss the Armenian issue more
freely? I believe the coup cases have put an end to an era and have
started a new one. Negotiation is required while trying to do
something. For example, while talking about the reopening of the Halki
Seminary on the island of Heybeliada near Ýstanbul, the issue of
reopening Turkish mosques in Greece should not be ignored. Allowing
worship once a year at the Cathedral Church of the Holy Cross, on the
Akdamar island in Lake Van, is a symbolic but very important and
positive move. There are very positive developments, and you cannot
ignore them.

Witness 6: ‘Since the Armenians have gone, prosperity has been gone too’

In the recent years, the 1915 incidents and the sorrows Armenians have
gone through are being discussed. Unlike in the past, the media also
extensively covers this issue. However, extensively discussing these
issues has both positive and negative impacts. It is not a good thing
to twist a knife in that wound. I am cautious about this issue. Look
at what happened to Hrant Dink. He was working for the sake of this
country. He wanted to introduce peace between Turks and Armenians. I
do not understand why the people of this country have gone through
great pains. Both sides have suffered. There is a saying in Anatolia
that says, “Since the Armenians have gone, prosperity has gone too.”
But the number of people who think killing Armenians or forcing them
to migrate was a good thing is not small.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.todayszaman.com/news-335876-being-an-armenian-in-the-capital-of-the-bureaucracy-2.html

Le citoyen et les lois mémorielles

Le Monde, France
3 janvier 2014 vendredi

Le citoyen et les lois mémorielles

LE MONDE DES LIVRES; Pg. 8

C’EST PRÉVU POUR 2015. Le président de la République a fait savoir
qu’il présenterait un projet de loi permettant de réprimer la négation
du génocide des Arméniens. La date est évidemment d’une grande portée
symbolique : le centenaire du génocide dans l’Empire turc, pendant la
Grande Guerre, en 1915. François Hollande s’inscrit ici dans un débat
déjà ancien. Depuis les années 2000, il y a eu plusieurs tentatives
parlementaires pour faire aboutir une telle mesure. La loi votée en ce
sens en 2011 a finalement été rejetée par le Conseil constitutionnel.
Ces enjeux s’apparentent à un feuilletage de questions qui dépassent
cette chronique, mais il y a fort à parier que le processus législatif
évoqué par la présidence relancera les discussions sur les lois dites
” mémorielles “.

C’est que, pour tout un ensemble d’historiens (René Rémond, Pierre
Nora ), la loi n’a pas à interférer avec leur discipline ; il faut
défendre la ” liberté pour l’histoire “. L’expression ” lois
mémorielles “, qui s’est ainsi largement répandue, comporte donc
souvent une connotation négative. Elle recouvre notamment la loi
Gayssot (1990, qui permet de sanctionner ceux qui nient l’existence de
la Shoah), la loi Taubira (2001, sur la traite et l’esclavage) et
celle, seulement déclarative, qui stipule : ” La France reconnaît
publiquement le génocide arménien de 1915 ” (2001). Elle vise aussi la
loi de 2005, d’une tout autre orientation : ” portant reconnaissance
de la Nation et contribution nationale en faveur des Français
rapatriés ” ; son article 4 disait : ” Les programmes scolaires
reconnaissent en particulier le rôle positif de la présence française
outre-mer, notamment en Afrique du Nord ( ) “. L’espace public s’était
enflammé sur ce passage, véritable injonction ” colonialiste ” aux
professeurs, tant et si bien qu’il avait été retiré. Pour se rappeler
comment, dans les débats d’alors, s’entremêlent mémoires, stratégies
politiques et lutte des historiens, on relira avec intérêt le livre
d’histoire ” à chaud ” qu’écrivit Romain Bertrand (Mémoires d’Empire,
Le Croquant, 2006). Il reste une analyse fine dont on tire profit pour
comprendre ce qui ne cesse de se rejouer. Une mission d’information de
l’Assemblée nationale avait, après cette affaire, préconisé la retenue
du Parlement en matière de ” lois mémorielles “.

Valeur universelle

Les partisans de ” la liberté pour l’histoire ” avaient ainsi prouvé
une influence médiatique et politique certaine. Avaient-ils, pour
autant, bien posé le problème ? Un numéro récent de la Revue
arménienne des questions contemporaines (” Légiférer sur la
contestation des génocides : débats et enjeux “, décembre 2012) permet
de se faire un avis informé. L’historien Boris Adjemian y interroge à
juste titre la notion même de ” lois mémorielles ” qui unifie des
textes à visée et à portée différentes. Dans le même numéro, Gérard
Noiriel remarque aussi que, lors des discussions de 2005, ” en mettant
sur le même plan des lois qui condamnent le racisme, l’esclavage, les
génocides et une loi qui fait l’apologie de la colonisation, cette
offensive a permis au gouvernement de désamorcer la polémique “. Bref,
on saisit bien que la notion de ” lois mémorielles ” est un concept de
combat, qui ne va pas de soi. Il est souvent brandi par ceux qui
considèrent que les mémoires ” particulières ” (juives, arméniennes,
etc.), soutenues par la loi, fragmentent l’unité nationale et le ”
pacte républicain “. Derrière la noble cause de l’histoire-science,
les dénonciations systématiques des ” lois mémorielles ” minimisent
ainsi la valeur universelle de ces politiques de mémoire et
affaiblissent l’espace public démocratique dans sa capacité à parler
d’histoire.

From: Baghdasarian

EU could become neutral mediator and honest broker on Karabakh issue

EU could become neutral mediator and honest broker on Karabakh issue – expert

January 05, 2014 | 15:11

YEREVAN. – The term that describes best the prospects of the
Nagorno-Karabakh issue in 2014 might be that of cautious pessimism,
political analyst Gunter Walzenbach told Armenian News-NEWS.am.

A senior lecturer at the University of the West of England, Bristol,
Gunter Walzenbach noted that the events around the Vilnius summit and
the continuing uncertainty around the future shape of the Eastern
Partnership will have raised awareness among EU decision makers not
just for the security concerns of individual countries, but also for
the strategic foreign policy orientations of Russia.

`In this context further progress or deterioration of EU-Russia
relations will also have repercussions for `frozen conflicts’ such as
the one in Nagorno-Karabakh. While measures for successful conflict
resolution were also part of the drafting and negotiation process of
the new association agreements, it remains doubtful whether the EU
foreign policy process can now produce an approach towards conflict
resolution that is more coherent and consistent than previous
efforts’, he said.

Walzenbach added that the instruments in the hand of the newly
established European External Action Service (EEAS) are limited and
the EU motto of `more for more’ is no convincing replacement for
stronger forms of economic and political conditionality.

However, from the expert’s point of view, this is not to say that
previous efforts and EU involvement in the Nagorno-Karabakh issue did
not proceed on the right track.

`In principle, the EU’s soft power image, concrete action in terms of
civil society engagement on both sides and a strengthened role for the
Union’s Special Representative can surely help in the long run to
build credibility as well as the necessary expertise to become the
neutral mediator and honest broker so much needed in the Southern
Caucasus’, Gunter Walzenbach emphasized. Yet, formally, he noted, all
the main responsibility still rests with the OSCE Minsk Group, and
disagreement will continue as to whether France is an adequate proxy
for the EU as a whole within this forum.

The expert believes that whatever type of specific solution might
eventually be championed by the negotiating parties in the case of
Nagorno-Karabakh, it will have profound repercussion for other
`frozen’ conflicts in the same or related regional settings.

`Yet a combined or integrated approach in relation to conflict
resolution in the cases of South Ossetia, Abkhazia, and Transnistria,
is of an order to tall for current EU diplomacy. In this
constellation, perhaps, more has to be expected from the political
leadership of both Azerbaijan and Armenia. Further meetings at
presidential level have been confirmed and sound promising, to say the
least’, he noted, adding that, in part, though, these are a reflection
of the degree of relative stability both leaders enjoy in their
respective political system.

While there are no convincing arguments to be found that recurrent
skirmishes and power gestures turn into a `hot conflict’, according to
Gunter Walzenbach, genuine conflict resolution seems equally remote.

`In the current state of affairs negotiation teams, diplomats and
decision-makers may have not much choice but look out for new windows
of opportunities coming along with broader changes in Russia’s
relations with the West’ emphasized the expert.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

From: Baghdasarian