ANKARA: Switzerland To Ask European Court To Review ‘Genocide’ Denia

SWITZERLAND TO ASK EUROPEAN COURT TO REVIEW ‘GENOCIDE’ DENIAL CASE

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
March 12 2014

12 March 2014 /REUTERS, ZURICH WITH TODAY’S ZAMAN

Switzerland will ask the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) to
review a case involving a Turkish politician who denied that mass
killings of Armenians in Ottoman Turkey in 1915 amounted to genocide,
the Ministry of Justice said on Tuesday.

A Swiss court had fined the leader of the leftist Turkish Workers’
Party (İP), Dogu Perincek, for having branded talk of an Armenian
genocide “an international lie” during a 2007 lecture tour in
Switzerland.

The European court, which upholds the 47-nation European Convention
on Human Rights (ECHR), said in December a Swiss law against genocide
denial violated the principle of freedom of expression.

In a press statement announcing the ruling, the court underlined
that the “free exercise of the right to openly discuss questions of a
sensitive and controversial nature was one of the fundamental aspects
of freedom of expression and distinguished a tolerant and pluralistic
democratic society from a totalitarian or dictatorial regime,” and
that Perincek had not committed an abuse of his rights.

The ruling has implications for other European states, such as France,
which have tried to criminalize the refusal to apply the term genocide
to the massacres of Armenians during the breakup of the Ottoman Empire.

Turkey accepts that many Armenians died in partisan fighting beginning
in 1915 but denies that up to 1.5 million were killed and that
this constituted an act of genocide — a term used by many Western
historians and foreign parliaments.

In requesting a referral of the case to the court’s Grand Chamber,
Switzerland is primarily seeking to clarify the scope available to
domestic authorities in applying the anti-racism law, the Ministry
of Justice said in a statement.

From: Baghdasarian

Lusine: True Taste Of Armenian Cuisine

LUSINE: TRUE TASTE OF ARMENIAN CUISINE

Arab News, Saudi Arabia
March 12 2014

What a good idea to serve Armenian cuisine! One cannot fail to be
impressed by the way Armenians have preserved their language and
traditions despite overwhelming odds. Although Armenian cuisine
shares many characteristics with that of its neighbors it has been
overshadowed by Lebanon’s cooking, which thanks to its enterprising
citizens has been exported to the four corners of the world. Lusine
gives us an opportunity to discover the distinctive specialties of
a country whose frontiers have changed considerably through history.

This explains why many Armenian dishes featured on the menu are similar
to those found in Lebanon and Syria, countries where Armenians had
found a new home.

Appetizers come in two kinds, hot and cold. They are so good that one
might be tempted to order too many so keep in mind that there are some
excellent main dishes. It is customary to start with a selection of
“basturma”, “sujuk” and “makanek”. Basturma is undoubtedly the most
popular Armenian deli meat, available in Middle Eastern specialty
shops. It is served thinly sliced and can be eaten with a salad but
it also delicious when it is fried along with eggs. “Sujuk” is a dry,
cured sausage, which is generally served sliced and fried with eggs
for breakfast. Not to be mistaken with the “Fruit Sujukh” made from
strings of shelled walnuts dipped in grape syrup until a thick and
tender coat covers them. And “makanek” are mini sausages which are
awfully good when they are served in a pomegranate sauce giving the
dish a delightful sweet and sour tang. A small bite and the sausage
skins loosen up, oozing out crumbly beef and the gory looking black
sauce that gives this dish its wonderful sweet and sour taste!

But, you must not omit to order “muhammarah”: a delicious dip with an
awesome combination of flavors: nutty, spicy and sweet and sour. It
is made with roasted red bell peppers, crushed walnuts, pomegranate
molasses, garlic, toasted breadcrumbs and flavored with lemon juice,
paprika, salt, pepper and sometimes cumin is even added. You can savor
“muhammarah” with the traditional Armenian bread “Lavash ” or as an
accompaniment to grilled chicken and meats. Lavash is a very large
paper thin, chewy bread that can only be made by hand. And last but not
least, you must try some “borek”, a variety of baked or fried pastries
stuffed with cheese or minced meat made with a thin flaky dough. They
are often served as an appetizer but they are also a popular snack. The
“Soborak” is a lasagna-style dish. It is made with sheets of pastry
briefly boiled before being spread with a cheese or a meat filling.

Incidentally, the “Tatar Borek” similar to tortellini or ravioli,
is an alternative name for Manti, a typical dish also featured on
Lusine’s menu. The dough is cut into little circles and a spoonful of
a mixture of beef, finely chopped flat parsley, pine nuts and onion,
is placed in the center. Then the manti is folded into a semicircle,
boiled in salted water for a few minutes and finally served in a
yogurt sauce or with melted butter

If you are looking for something very special then I recommend the
“Kabab Bil Karaz” a delicious dish made with minced lamb and “wishna”,
a small and sour black cherry that grows on the outskirts of the city
of Aleppo. “Kabab Bil Karaz” or “Cherry Kabab” is a great specialty
of the Syrian town of Aleppo whose cuisine is inspired by a mosaic of
cultures including the most recent ones, the Ottomans and Armenians. A
similar dish is “Ras Alasfour”, diced beef grilled and served with
a cherry sauce flavored with cinnamon and a pinch of cumin.

Another typical Armenian dish is Harissa, a dish which is found not
only in the Middle East but even in Pakistan. The Armenians use a
special kind of wheat for Harissa which is unavailable outside the
Middle East. Therefore, Harissa is sometimes prepared with pearl
barley instead.

To make “Harissa”, chuck steak is boiled until the meat is very
tender and falls apart. It is then mixed with the wheat or barley,
flavored with cinnamon and cumin and sprinkled with hot butter just
before it is served. Harissa is eaten with bread and salads.

Speaking of salads, the Armenian Bulgur salad, known as “Itch” is a
welcome change from the ubiquitous “Tabboulah”, made with bulgur,
parsley and tomatoes. Itch is a tasty salad prepared with chopped
yellow onions, diced peppers, parsley, mint, tomatoes and dressed
with olive oil, and pomegranate molasses which give this salad its
sweet and sour tang.

I personally enjoy savoring a nice selection of cheese at the end
of a meal. But very few restaurants, apart from French and Italian
restaurants, feature cheeses on their menu so I was surprised but
delighted to find a variety of traditional Armenian cheese served with
honey and fruit. Armenians have produced cheese in ancient times and it
has become an inseparable part of the Armenian diet. The most common
types of Armenian cheeses are Lori and Chanakh. They are both salty
white cheeses aged in brine water. Another famous Armenian cheese is
the string cheese made from goat milk which is ripened and stored in
special ceramic jars. The strings are formed because of the special
technology of pulling the cheese during processing. This delicious
cheese has a white texture soft and brittle, it is distinctively salty,
savory and flavored with aromatic herbs.

If you are wondering what drink to order with your food, you might
like to order “tan” which accompanies every Armenian meal. This
yogurt beverage ( yoghurt is blended with water until smooth) is
also popular in the region. In Lebanon, Syria , Turkey, and Jordan,
this refreshing drink is called “Ayran” and it is seasoned with salt.

It has often been said that the best food in Armenia is found at home.

For most of us who have limited opportunities to enjoy Armenian home
cooking in Riyadh, Lusine gives us the possibility to taste Armenian
food at its best.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.arabnews.com/news/538766

Spring Happenings At Armenian Heritage Park On The Greenway

SPRING HAPPENINGS AT ARMENIAN HERITAGE PARK ON THE GREENWAY

NorthEndWaterfront.com, MA
March 11 2014

By Matt Conti

Here are the Spring happenings at the Armenian Heritage Park on the
Greenway, courtesy of the park’s foundation.

ANNUAL RECONFIGURATION OF THE ABSTRACT SCULPTURE: END OF MARCH Annually
in March, the Abstract Sculpture, a split dodecahedron, at Armenian
Heritage Park on the Greenway is reconfigured in celebration of the
immigrant experience. The annual reconfiguration commemorates all
who were pulled away from their country of origin and came to these
Massachusetts shores reconfiguring their lives in new and different
ways, contributing to the richness of the American life and culture.

WORLD LABYRINTH DAY: SATURDAY, MAY 3, 2014 at 1pm Celebrate World
Labyrinth Day at Armenian Heritage Park on the Greenway joining peoples
all over the world “Walking as One at 1â~@³ in peace and harmony,
celebrating life’s journey.

LABYRINTH WALKS WITH THE LABYRINTH GUILD OF NEW ENGLAND MAY-OCTOBER
1st Wednesday/month 7:30am 3rd Wednesday/month 12:30pm

CHEFS PARTY FOR OUR PARK! BENEFIT FOR ARMENIAN HERITAGE PARK’S ONGOING
CARE Celebrate with Boston’s Top Chefs, presenting signature dishes
inspired by parents, grandparents or mentors for you to taste while
you mix, mingle, enjoy and support a great cause.

Wednesday, May 21, 2014, 6:30 pm at the Royal Sonesta Hotel. Advance
Reservations required. For reservation information, please email
[email protected]

The Armenian Heritage Park is on the Greenway between Faneuil Hall
Marketplace and Christopher Columbus Park at the intersection of
Cross Street and Atlantic Avenue. See ArmenianHeritagePark.org for
more information.

From: Baghdasarian

http://northendwaterfront.com/2014/03/spring-happenings-at-armenian-heritage-park-on-the-greenway/

Checking The Pulse On Azeri-Armenian Front Line

CHECKING THE PULSE ON AZERI-ARMENIAN FRONT LINE

Institute for War & Peace Reporting , UK
IWPR Caucasus Reporting #726
March 5 2014

Speakers at IWPR debate discuss whether recent deterioration indicates
worse is to come.

By IWPR Caucasus – Caucasus CRS Issue 726,

A recent upsurge in shootings along Azerbaijani-Armenian front lines
is pronounced enough to alarm commentators on both sides, who are
unsure whether this is a temporary blip or the start of things to come.

Tensions escalated through the second half of January both along the
Armenian-Azerbaijani border and on the “line of control” that separates
Karabakh Armenian and Azerbaijani forces. Although full casualty
figures have not been released, Armenian officials confirmed that
two soldiers died on January 19 and 28. The Azerbaijani authorities
announced the deaths of two servicemen, on January 23 and January 27.

Breaches of the 1994 ceasefire are not uncommon, but there was
something about recent developments that made commentators pause for
thought. To probe the issues, IWPR brought together Armenian and
Azerbaijani experts for a joint event at which they discussed the
causes and implications of the latest incidents.

The January 30 event was held at the Media Centre in Yerevan, with
Azerbaijani participants taking part via a video link.

On the Armenian side, the speakers were Sergei Minasyan, deputy
director of the Caucasus Institute, and Manvel Sargsyan, director of
the Armenian Centre for National and International Studies. They were
joined from Azerbaijan by Kenan Guluzade, editor of the Baku Post
newspaper, and Avaz Hasanov, head of the Society for Humanitarian
Research and a member of the International Working Group for the
Release of Prisoners and Hostages.

Minasyan began by asking his colleagues about the significance of
the recent frontier skirmishes.

“Is this the start of more serious developments, or is it just the
standard situation on the front line which we’ve really been observing
for the last two decades?” he asked.

Sargsyan said increases in shooting were not uncommon when
international meetings were taking place – in this case, a meeting
between the Armenian and Azerbaijani foreign ministers.

“There’s a perception that it’s better to pursue negotiations in an
atmosphere of tension rather than calm. This philosophy gives rise
to all these things that are playing out on the front line,” he said.

By contrast, Guluzade disagreed that there was anything unusual about
the latest incidents, since this kind of thing was a regular feature
of what was misleadingly described as a “frozen conflict”.

All the speakers discussed possible reasons why the military narrative
was being dramatised.

Guluzade said what puzzled him more than the events themselves were
the hysterical media reports.

“The information coming from the front line is really just rumour at
the moment. No one knows how many people died, what kind of operations
have been going on, or what’s really happening. Some Azerbaijani
bloggers are claiming up to 35 deaths on the Armenian side, but where
are the bodies of these soldiers?”

He continued, “I think the media and social network users are
exaggerating things far too much.”

He said it was hard to work who had an interest in fueling this kind
of reporting – the Armenian or Azerbaijani governments as a whole,
or just the military or diplomats on one or both sides.

Hasanov agreed that the material appearing on social networking sites
was painting a totally misleading picture, so that someone who did
not use alternative news sources “might think war that had broken out”.

“That’s the impression that’s been given recently – archive photos
from the [1990s] Georgian-Abkhazian war were posted, along with
video footage that even an expert would find it hard to identify,”
Hasanov said.

According to Minasyan, this propaganda war is not unusual – it fits
the past pattern of rhetoric around border clashes.

“In my view, when one assesses the situation over the last seven to
ten day, one really gets a sense of deja vu,” he said. “Over the last
20 years we’ve repeatedly seen tensions to various extents. But for a
whole set of reasons, escalation has not led to real combat. Clearly
the political and military balance has had an effect, as has a
reluctance on both Armenian and Azerbaijani sides to make these
confrontations on the front line into something more substantial.”

Minasyan said it was his view that the current tensions were not
a sign of impending conflict. Tit-for-tat shooting incidents had
their own dynamic in which they periodically increased or subsided,
but were prevented from growing into anything bigger.

Minasyan asked whether the recent appointment of a new defence
minister in Azerbaijan Zakir Hasanov, might have contributed to the
escalation in tensions, as the new official tried to demonstrate
a robust approach. Guluzade expressed scepticism about this idea,
saying the minister’s role meant he was more of a “manager” and did
not really direct military operations.

Sargsyan said that border clashes happened as a direct expression of
policymaking decisions. The human cost was something that was rarely
discussed, but it was something people really cared about. In Armenia
and Azerbaijan, he argued, “the public could influence the leaderships
of both countries to abandon this policy”.

The video-link debate – a rare opportunity for Azerbaijanis and
Armenians to hear considered views from the other side – was attended
by journalists and NGO representatives in Yerevan. It prompted over
a dozen articles published in both Armenian and Azerbaijani media.

From: Baghdasarian

http://iwpr.net/report-news/checking-pulse-azeri-armenian-front-line

Experts On Possible Impact On Armenia Of Western Sanctions Against R

EXPERTS ON POSSIBLE IMPACT ON ARMENIA OF WESTERN SANCTIONS AGAINST RUSSIA

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
March 12 2014

12 March 2014 – 8:12pm

Armenian Minister of the Economy Vagram Avanesyan has recently
announced that possible EU and US sanctions against Russia would affect
the Armenian economy. His opinion is shared by Tatul Manaseryan and
Sergey Minasyan.

According to head of the analysis centre Alternative, Tatul
Manaseryan, such sanctions would affect trade ties and joint investment
projects. He believes, however, that Western sanctions against Russia
are improbable.

The deputy head of the Caucasus Institute, Sergey Minasyan, said
possible EU and US sanctions would first of all damage the Armenian
financial system, because in the sphere of finance Armenian-Russian
ties are especially close.

From: Baghdasarian

Belgrade Overwhelmed By Yugoslavian Pilots’ Heroism In Armenia 25 Ye

BELGRADE OVERWHELMED BY YUGOSLAVIAN PILOTS’ HEROISM IN ARMENIA 25 YEARS AGO – SERBIA MFA

March 12, 2014 | 07:32

YEREVAN. – Belgrade was overwhelmed by the Yugoslavian pilots’
heroism inArmenia 25 years ago.

Serbian Foreign Minister Ivan MrkiÄ~G, who is in Armenia in connection
with the first Serbian-Armenian Business Forum, told the aforementioned
to Armenian News-NEWS.am.

MrkiÄ~G informed that he was in Belgrade when he had heard the news
about the death of the seven pilots who were bringing humanitarian
aid from ex-Yugoslavia to Armenia in 1989 to the survivors of the
devastating earthquake that hit Armenia in December 1988.

“I remember how shocked everyone was. The news was a great tragedy
for everyone. But we knew that the pilots had the task of arriving
in friendly Armenia, when it was in a real difficult situation,”
the Serbia FM noted.

Ivan MrkiÄ~G had earlier stated that he will end his trip to Armenia
with a visit to the obelisk devoted to these pilots.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

From: Baghdasarian

Armenia Could Sign Political Component Of Association Agreement: MP’

ARMENIA COULD SIGN POLITICAL COMPONENT OF ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT: MP’S PROPOSAL TO GOVERNMENT

20:44 * 12.03.14

During the question hour in Armenia’s Parliament on Wednesday,
Secretary of the Heritage parliamentary group Tevan Poghosyan asked
whether, following Ukraine’s example, Armenia intends to sign the
political component of an Association Agreement with the European Union
(EU).

Armenia’s Minister of Justice Hrayr Tovmasyan said that the matter is
within the competence of Armenia’s president and government. However,
he welcomes the idea.

“Don’t you think that, after the EU stated its willingness to sign an
Association Agreement with Ukraine, Armenia’s authorities, which had
consistently stated their readiness to continue cooperating with the
EU, should insist on negotiating and signing the political component
of an Association Agreement with the EU?”

In response, minister Tovmasyan said:

“I can welcome the fact that the issue remains on the agenda, and at
a certain stage, Armenia’s president or minister of foreign affairs
will say what possibilities are available.”

With respect to reforms in Armenia’s justice system, Minister Tovmasyan
said that large-scale reforms are being implemented.

“European standards are on the Armenian government agenda. And the
process will continue regardless of our economic relations with the
Customs Union.”

Before September, Armenia’s government will negotiate a $20m budget
proposal with the EU. A 3-year $29m budget proposal program has been
signed and approved by Armenia’s president.

“This is evidence of active implementation of the cooperation program,”
Minister Tovmasyan said.

Armenia is to receive an additional EURO 7m for a new penitentiary
for 1,200 people in conformity with European standards.

A EURO 1.5m worth Access to Justice in Armenia program, in cooperation
with the Council of Europe, is at its initial stage as well.

Armenian News – Tert.am

From: Baghdasarian

Armenian Embassy In Russia Holds The Presentation Of Rouben Galchian

ARMENIAN EMBASSY IN RUSSIA HOLDS THE PRESENTATION OF ROUBEN GALCHIAN’S LATEST BOOK.

Thurs 03/06/2014 – 13:41

“Azerbaijani historical and geographical falsifications”

The presentation of the Russian edition of the book Ruben Galchian’s
book entitled “Azerbaijani historical and geographical falsifications”
was held on March 4 at the Armenian Embassy in Moscow, Russia. This
was reported by the press service of the Armenian Foreign Ministry.

During his speech at the event, the Armenian Ambassador to Russia
Oleg Yesayan noted that the book is of great interest to both the
scientific and academic circles, as well as the general public.

“This work of Ruben Galchian is important primarily in that it is the
real history of the region, without the distortions, which create
serious obstacles to the settlement of the Karabakh conflict, and
also hamper the development of good-neighbourly relations between
the peoples of the region”, – said the ambassador.

The event was opened by the Director of the Institute of Political and
Social Studies of the Black Sea-Caspian Region Professor Vladimir
Zakharov. Speakers included the President of the International
Academy of Spiritual Unity of Georgy Trapeznikov, president of
“Russian-Armenian Commonwealth” Yuri Navoyan author of “Armenian prince
Manuk Bey” and other works. Gohar Rshtuni, chairman of the Ararat
society Dolbakyan Emanuel and chief editor of the news portal “Ayas”
Tigran Minasyan also expressed their views regarding the importance
of the book.

During the presentation of the book the author referred to the
ongoing policy of Azerbaijan to distort history, its origins and
methodology used. He noted that the book is the result of long and
hard work, and is an attempt to objectively represent real history
thru internationally accepted sources.

The event was attended by political scientists, historians, civic
leaders and youth organizations, representatives of the Union of
Writers of Russia, the ex-Ambassador of Russian Federation to Armenia
and representatives of Russian universities and the media.

In the book “Azerbaijani historical and geographical falsifications”
details the main historic stages of the states south of the Caucasus
with maps of different epochs and references to historical sources.

Research includes historical and ethnographic materials, it also
presents an analysis of 45 important Christian, Islamic, Greek and
Roman maps, which are of great historical significance.

Azerbaijani historical falsifications.

Wed, 05/03/2014 – 17:10

Ruben Galchyan

The presentation of the book in Moscow, according to the author –
Rouben Galichian.

In May 1918 in the region south of the Caucasus three new states
were formed, two of which – Armenia and Georgia had a rich history
and tradition of the statehood. At the same time, north of the
Arax River and on the east coast of the Caspian Sea another state –
Azerbaijan was formed, whose name was an anomaly for this region. The
newly established country gave itself the name of one of the ancient
north-eastern provinces of Persia, Azerbaijan, which the Armenian
call with its historical name – Atrpatakan.

At the time, many Persian scholars protested against the use of the
name of their province for the naming of the newly established state.

However, at the time the Great Powers were engaged in the division of
Middle East oil wells amongst themselves and they did not have time
to deal with other seemingly unimportant issues. When the Communist
order was established in Azerbaijan, the new government decided to
keep the old name with the intention of using it in the future to
their political advantage.

In 1925 the Russian orientalist Vassily Vladimirovich Bartold in
his speech in Baku University announced that the name Azerbaijan was
given to the new country only for political purposes, a prediction,
which was later confirmed. This was first manifested when in 1947 in
Tabriz the Democratic Party announced its desire to join the Soviet
Azerbaijan and yet again in 1992, when the President of independent
Azerbaijan, Mr. Elchibey announced that he intends to reunite their
brothers and sisters living across the border in Iran.

In time Stalin ordered that each republic of the Soviet Union should
have its unique and particular history and culture. But how could
this be made true by a newly created state without past and unified
history and culture? The solution was found – the history and culture
of the peoples living in this territory of ancient peoples could be
declared as their own. To this end Azerbaijani authorities planned and
implemented special programs which were intensified during the 1960s.

They reached their apex after independence, with the encouragement
and guidance of President Ilham Aliyev.

Since the dominant culture in the region was Armenian, the Azerbaijani
historians had to take the following steps:

a) to eliminate the names of all Armenians from the region claiming
them to be newcomers in the region of the South Caucasus, who arrived
there during the early 19th century.

b) to declare that the Albanian Christians or Caucasian Albanians
who embraced Islam after the tenth century, were their forefathers.

c) when the opportunity arose to announce that they belong to the
“great” Turkic nation.

The above actions would give them the possibility of appropriating
all the local history and culture and make them an “ancient” and
“great” country.

While implementing these programs Azerbaijani authorities encountered
many problems which they conveniently ignored in order to achieve
their end. The main problems were:

1. Despite the fact that the name of the country was changed to
Azerbaijan, until the adoption of the Stalinist constitution in 1936,
the locals called themselves “Turks”.

2. The vast majority of Christian monuments of Azerbaijan and
Artsakh were built during the 10th to 18th centuries, when the local
Albanians had already been Islamized. The question arises- how could
Islamized Albanians build and renovate Christian churches, monasteries,
cross-stones, or were they perhaps done by local Armenian builders?

3. From the 12th century the region was visited by European, Arab and
Persian travellers who meticulously described the life and culture of
the Armenians living in the South Caucasus. The Persian Shah Abbas, who
the Azerbaijanis claim to be their own, in 1604-5 forcibly displaced
about half a million Armenians to Persia from Nakhichevan, Armenia and
Artsakh. If one is to believe what the Azerbaijani historians claim,
there would be no Armenians living there, therefore, where did Shah
Abbas brought this great mass of people from and why did he give
them special permission to name their new settlement New “Julfa”,
which was one of the names of their previous hometowns?

4. The common language spoken in Azerbaijan and Iranian provinces of
Azerbaijan is erroneously called “Azeri”, while it actually is a form
of “Turkish”. According to Iranian and Iranian Azerbaijani scientists,
until the 15th to 16th centuries the spoken language of the Iranian
Azerbaijani people was not Turkish, but a dialect of middle Persian,
which was the real Azeri language. Since the rule of the Seljuks
the local language was gradually replaced by the language of the
new masters – the Turks. It should be noted that in the Azerbaijani
provinces of Iran there still are some settlements, whose inhabitants
speak with their ancient Iranian dialects.

Azerbaijanis have an excellent weapon for amending, modifying and
censoring the ancient history. A country that insists having five
thousand years of statehood, has no written culture language until
the second half of the 19th century, and even then uses the Persian as
their written language. Thus, they began writing any official document
and books in Persian and when the language was changed to Turkish, they
first used the Persian alphabet. First they used the Persian-Arabic
script, later, in 1929 they changed it to the Latin alphabet, and
in 1939 this was changed to the Cyrillic alphabet, and once again,
after independence they returned to a modified Latin alphabet.

All these transliterations allow the Azerbaijani authorities and
historians to change, transform and falsify their own history to
serve their political goals, which manifest itself in all literature.

Azerbaijanis insist that:

Azerbaijani statehood has five thousand years of history.

1. Azerbaijan as an independent country has existed more than
2,000 years.

2. Empires, including the Arab Caliphate, Iran and Russia colonized
Azerbaijan, emasculating its Turkish culture.

3. In 1813 and 1828 a joint Russian-Iranian conspiracy divided
Azerbaijan into two parts and brought the Armenians to the Caucasus.

4. Founded in 1918, the Republic of Azerbaijan testified to the
revival of historical Azerbaijan, the first democracy in the East.

The present book is book carefully studies the works of European,
Arab, Persian, and other historians born in the territory of modern
Azerbaijan concluding that the country called “Azerbaijan” located
north of the Arax River, was founded in 1918 and its population being
a mixture of various nationalities and cultures, cannot be claimed
to have one unique and individual culture and history. The book also
reveals the reasons and purpose of historical falsification of the
Azerbaijan Republic.

Like the United States of America, Azerbaijan should also have
the courage to admit that its population is a mixture of different
cultures and histories that cannot be uniform and be called uniquely
Azerbaijani.

After this introduction and for further clarification, some twenty
ancient and medieval map images were presented and analysed.

ROUBEN GALCHIAN, London, 2014

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.russia-armenia.info/node/5438
http://www.russia-armenia.info/node/5418%20%0d3

Turkish Businesswomen Demand To Open Border With Armenia

TURKISH BUSINESSWOMEN DEMAND TO OPEN BORDER WITH ARMENIA

19:04 12/03/2014 ” ECONOMY

Turkey’s Southeastern Businesswomen Association (DOGUNKAD) is in
favor of opening the Turkish-Armenian border, Internet Haber reports.

According to Nevin İl, chairwoman of the Association, the opening
of the border with Armenia by the Turkish authorities would increase
the volume of exports by 50 percent.

“With the Armenian-Turkish border being closed, we have to transport
goods to Armenia via Georgia. It takes 35 hours to travel to Armenia by
bus, while it would take six hours to get there by car. It is necessary
to open the border. It is very important for boosting trade,” she said.

Source: Panorama.am

From: Baghdasarian

Sworn Anti-Armenian Turkish Politician Is Released From Prison

SWORN ANTI-ARMENIAN TURKISH POLITICIAN IS RELEASED FROM PRISON

March 11, 2014 | 13:41
Dogu Perincek was released by a Turkish court decision. Against the
backdrop of the conflict between PM Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Islamic
opinion leader Fethullah Gulen, the Turkish authorities have begun
releasing those who were sentenced to prison in connection with the
Ergenekon case on the attempt to overthrow the current government of
the country.

Among those released is Dogu Perincek, who is a sworn anti-Armenian
politician, Chairman of the socialist Workers’ Party of Turkey, and
head of the Talat Pasha organization which actively fights against
the Armenian Genocide’s recognition in Europe.

After being released, Perincek issued a statement before reporters,
and stressed that the time has come to fight against and uproot the
religious communities in Turkey.

On December 17, 2013, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
ruled in favor of Armenian Genocide-denying Turkish politician
Dogu Perincek’s lawsuit that was filed against Switzerland. The
said judgment by the ECtHR was made on the grounds of freedom of
speech. In 2008, a Swiss court had convicted Perincek for denying
the Armenian Genocide.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

From: Baghdasarian