IDENTITY THEFT GRAND SLAM
Editorial, 11 July 2014
Thanks to the Internet the invasion of privacy has become a commonplace
bane of our lives. The criminals who try to steal our identities
usually have financial gain in mind. Recently there was an identity
theft on a grander scale: a theft far, far more ambitious,virulent, and
far reaching. The identities stolen were that of national origin. There
were 16 such simultaneous thefts. The criminal was none other than
the Republic of Turkey.
This is how the heist started:
Five years ago a researcher in Brantford (100 kilometers west of
Toronto) discovered that about 16 “Turk” internees from World War I
period were buried in that city’s Mount Hope Cemetery. The news caught
the eye of Ali Riza Gunay, the eager-beaver Turkish consul in Toronto.
The diplomat realized he had hit a jackpot: his superiors had recently
sent a directive to all Turkish diplomats to search in the countries
where they served for places, events, and people linked to Turkey.
The idea was to burnish the questionable image of Turkey by building
“bridges” to countries all over the world. The “Turkish” interns
would eminently fill the bill. There was also a huge bonus: Ankara
saw the Turkish internees as a whip to lash Canada for recognizing
the Genocide of Armenians. To underline their nefarious intent,
the mandarins in Ankara decided to erect a Turkish monument in the
cemetery. Upon learning of the plot, Ontario Armenians and Alevis
launched a campaign to stop it: further research by the Brantford
historian soon revealed that the internees were Kurdish Alevis who had
emigrated to Canada just before WWI and often lived in the houses of
Armenians who had been their friends back in “old country” and had
encouraged them to flee Ottoman persecution for freedom in Canada.
About 25 Toronto-area Armenian activists initiated a campaign in
early July 2013 to stop the Turkish monument. They met Alevi leaders,
including Suleyman Guven, editor of the “Yeni Hayat” Alevi newspaper
and visited the cemetery, along with Alevis, and interviewed the
Brantford researcher who repeated that the internees had been Kurd
Alevis. The Armenians also launched a petition and sent letters to the
local MP, to the minister of multiculturalism and other officials of
the federal, provincial and municipal governments, including Brantford
Mayor Chris Friel and his council.
The Armenian group then invited to a meeting Toronto-area Armenian
political parties to discuss how to collectively react to the Turkish
farce. Mike Kharabian, the head of the Ramgavars attended, in addition
to Vazken Terzian, a member of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation.
The latter in unofficial capacity. Upon the request of the “Stop
the Fake Monument” group, Hye Tadd was invited to the activists’
second meeting. At that meeting, Hye Tadd representative Nshan Atikian
dismissed the work that the activists had done and informed the group
that Hye Tadd had been following the issue for several years. He
almost implied that the activists were interfering with the good work
of Hye Tadd.
Assuming the campaign was in good hands, the activists’ group
disbanded, although several of its members, including the editorial
board of Keghart.com, kept an eye on developments.
Facing bad publicity and solid resistance from the Armenian and Alevi
communities, the Turkish consul changed his tack and suggested a
modest plaque, instead of a loud monument. Meanwhile, the Brantford
City Council decided to obtain the federal government’s view before
proceeding. The issue became dormant.
The Turkish project was silently revived this spring (from modest
plaque to tombstone). The Brantford City Council heard from Mr. Guven
of “Yeni Hayat” and the imam of the Brantford mosque about a proposal
to install two tombstones in sector of the cemetery where the Alevis
were buried. The Imam insisted that the people buried were Muslims.
Mr. Guven, who presented ample proof, made it clear that the interned
were Alevis, thus not Muslim or Turk. The council voted to hold
a meeting in early June to decide on the date of a second meeting
which would be the final word on the Turkish-initiated project. But
suddenly, on June 11, it was announced in the “Brantford Examiner”
that at its first meeting in June, the council had decided to give
permission to two tombstones–one for the Muslims, the other for the
Alevis. Each group would cover its expenses. Alevis were not even
informed of the council’s final decision, said Mr. Guven. How the two
tombstones idea was expedited and engineered by Mayor Friel remains
a mystery: throughout the controversy, the mayor had been close to
Consul Gunay. The mayor had complained that he didn’t want to see
Brantford enmeshed in “international” politics, although for several
years he had been playing footsy with Mr. Gunay. Perhaps he didn’t
know that the very job of Mr. Gunay is international politics. The
mayor also crossed verbal swords with Mr. Guven who publicly accused
the mayor of pro-Turkish bias.
While the two tombstones plan was being approved, the Armenian
National Committee of Canada (ANCC) had been presumably working
behind the scenes. The “Brantford Expositor” said that in addition to
“discussions with Turkish representatives, the federal government has
also heard from representatives of the Canadian-Armenian community”.
Councilor Phil Coleman said that the Brant MP [the local riding]
“believes the Armenian Community has no issue with a stone or plaque
going up on the site but has insisted that whatever is put on the
plaque must be historically accurate.” Was that lame stance the essence
of ANCC’s attitude? Was the milquetoast response the best ANCC could
do to stop the Turkish propaganda project?
And before one could say “Recep Tayyip Erdogan”, a slick “Muslim”
monument was planted in the plot where Alevis are buried: a Turkish
political plot over an Alevi plot.
To celebrate, the Turkish Federation in Toronto bused some of its
members to the inauguration (June 22) of the “Muslim” tombstone which
had the Turkish flag etched at its top. Although it was supposed
to be a Muslim ceremony officiated by the local Arab imam, three
Turkish imams from Toronto and Hamilton took over the ceremony and
made speeches in Turkish, referring to the Alevis as Turkish martyrs
(“shaheeds”) similar “to the people who liberated the homeland
(‘vatan’)” meaning Turkey. Meanwhile, the Turkish community held a
victory dance and stomped all over the cemetery, fluttering at least
eight over-sized Turkish flags…celebrants wore red tee-shirts with
the Turkish star-and-crescent blazing on them; others wore red jackets
with the Turkish flag. Too late the Palestinian imam realized that
the Turkish community and its federation had hijacked the “Muslim”
ceremony into a Turkish “chifteh telli”. Mayor Friel, who had attended
the Turkish requiem-fiesta together with Councilors Dave Neumann and
Vince Bucci, told to Mr. Guven in an email a few days later: “Turks
absolutely politicized the process and much to my disgust. We have
severed any remaining contacts with their representatives…Brantford
Muslims were blindsided as I was.” Too late, Mr. Mayor; too late to
wake up and smell the Turkish coffee. The $4,500 Turkish monument is
now comfortably encased in the plot where no Turk is buried.
While the Turkish consul and his friends were pretending the monument
was in honor of Muslims, the Turkish Federation and the 100 Turks bused
in from Toronto gave away the game through their words and misbehavior,
and called a spade a spade: the monument was Turkish. The Turkish
attendees also exposed the hypocrisy of the Turkish government and
its representatives in Canada. To emphasize the point, local Turkish
TV and radio provided full coverage of the “Muslim” ceremony and
accurately called the tombstone “Turkish monument”. On “Turkuaz TV”,
a Turkish Federation spokesman said: “We meant to erect a Turkish
monument. As a first step we put the crescent-and-star as the symbol
of our Turkish flag. We want to commemorate our martyrs.” Anatolian
Radio (June 21) invited its listeners to attend the “Ottoman Turkish
Internment” ceremony in Brantford. It said: “The Turkish Community
finally succeeded in its efforts to have a tombstone erected in
the Turkish section of the Mount Hope Cemetery in Brantford for our
compatriots who were rounded up by the Canadian Government during
the First World War and imprisoned in Kapuskasing and who then lost
their lives…” The “Canadaturk” newspaper gave full-court coverage.
Now that the efforts of the Armenian activists and members of the
Alevi community have failed, there are several questions which remain
unanswered.
Why didn’t the Alevi community provide adequate support to the
energetic and committed editor of its newspaper “Yeni Hayat”? Was it
because Alevis are afraid their kin in Turkey might be harmed? The
Alevi community has the right to know.
Why did ANCC’s Ontario chapter fail to stop the Turkish tombstone,
especially after reams of documentation (some of them posted in
Keghart.com) available which unequivocally proved that the interned
are Alevis?
>From day one the ANCC knew that the monument was politically motivated
(one of its representatives said so). It was such an important
propaganda project for Ankara that last year, when the Turkish consul
had planned to erect a monument Ankara scheduled Deputy Prime Minister
Bekir Bozdag to attend its unveiling, and arrangements were made
to cover the event on a prestigious TV station in Ontario. From day
one the ANCC knew that Ankara wanted to portray the Alevi buried in
Brantford as Turks killed by the Canadian government. From day one
the ANCC knew that the intention was to use these “Turkish martyrs”
to tarnish Canada’s image and to chastise it for recognizing the
Genocide of Armenians. It was to force an apology from Canada for
committing “genocide” of Turks. From day one the ANCC knew that the
Turkish Project was to put Canada on the defensive, to neutralize it,
especially with the Genocide centennial on the corner. Canada is well
known around the globe as a protector of human rights. The Ankara jab
is to throw mud at Canada. A country which kills demonstrators, bans
Twitter and YouTube, jails more journalists than any other country,
a country where to call someone “Armenian” is a common curse, is out
to teach Canada about human rights.
Despite the importance of the issue, how can the ANCC explain its
lukewarm (at best) and dismissive (at worst) attitude? Armenians
have the right to expect more from their “most effective” lobbying
organization. Supine doesn’t work in politics.
Midway the campaign to stop the Turkish monument, the Armenian
activists had an extensive program to publicize the Turkish sham,
to attend Brantford City Council meetings, to meet the local media,
to hold demonstrations in Brantford, to network in Brantford, to
distribute flyers in that city exposing the Turkish Game… These
plans were promptly abandoned when the group disbanded upon the
ANCC assurances that the “official Armenian lobby” was on top of
the situation.
Now what?
Will the ANCC do what Armenians campaign for the removal of the
disgraceful and fraudulent Turkish tombstone and work for its
replacement by a non-religious, non-political tombstone or at least
remove the objectionable Turkish flag on top of Alevi immigrants who
died in Canada a century ago?
We wait with bated breath.
From: Baghdasarian
http://www.keghart.com/Editorial-Identity-Theft-Brantford