Single Window And IT Systems To Be Used For Full Implementation Of T

SINGLE WINDOW AND IT SYSTEMS TO BE USED FOR FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE E-GOVERNANCE CONCEPT IN ARMENIA

15-07-2014 18:27:29 | Armenia | Science and Technology

Yerevan, 15 July 2014 – A two-day national workshop on the role
of Single Window and IT systems for full implementation of the
e-governance concept is organized in Yerevan within the framework of
the UNDP implemented “Enhancement of the Border Management Capabilities
at Bagratashen – Sadakhlo BCP between Armenia and Georgia” (BSIBM)
project.

The objective of the workshop is to familiarize representatives of
relevant border management agencies in better detail with measures
required for introduction of the e-governance system by applying the
Single Window principle and up-to-date IT solutions. The workshop
is facilitated by Mr. Arvo Ott, Managing Director of the Estonian
E-Governance Academy.

Ambassador Traian Hristea, Head of the EU Delegation to Armenia,
welcomed the participants and stated that introduction of the Single
Window/One Stop Shop principle at the national level will largely
complement general efforts towards the development of a national
e-governance system as well as major reforms in the border management
sector, including infrastructure development and modernization
of border crossing points. “EU always stands ready to support the
Government of Armenia in implementation of its reform agenda, and
share its vast experience particularly in the area of e-governance and
introduction of its components at the national level using appropriate
IT solutions and procedural approaches”, he added.

Grigori Malintsyan, UNDP IBM Programme Manager, noted that introduction
of the Single Window/One Stop Shop principle will be a significant step
forward to achieve the defined reform goals in the border management
sector and ensure compliance with relevant international standards.

Aram Tananyan, Acting Chief of Staff of the National Security Council
of the Republic of Armenia, expressed an opinion that comprehensive
introduction of the Single Window system in Armenia will enable
simplification and streamlining of border crossing and customs
procedures at border crossing points in order to avoid duplication
of functions and unnecessary controls.

The “Provision of Equipment and Infrastructure for the
Bagratashen-Sadakhlo Border Crossing Point between Armenia and
Georgia and Enhancement of their Capacities” project is implemented
since December 2013 with the financial support of the European Union
and contributions of the Governments of Armenia and Georgia. The EU
funding is EURO 3,582,500.

– Science and Technology News from Armenia and Diaspora – Noyan Tapan –
See more at:

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.nt.am/en/news/196691/#sthash.vAqrCzhM.dpuf

Hraparak: Hollande’s Regional Visit Linked To Karabakh Settlement

HRAPARAK: HOLLANDE’S REGIONAL VISIT LINKED TO KARABAKH SETTLEMENT

09:24 * 16.07.14

The paper says it has learned from sources close to the US Embassy
to Armenia that the French president’s recent visit to the South
Caucasus region was linked to new his new plans on settlement of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

As the leader of a state which acts as a co-chair of the OSCE Minsk
Group, Francois Hollande reportedly sought his country’s dominance
in the mission to keep the plans for new a new meeting between the
Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents under control. The paper says that
Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan unequivocally expressed support to
Hollande’s proposal, and so did the Azerbaijani leader, Ilham Aliyev.

Citing its sources, the paper claims further that Mr Hollande and
the United States seek to not only arrange a meeting but also make
the heads of the conflicting countries sign a declaration reiterating
their commitment to reach a peaceful settlement of the land dispute.

The paper adds that this kind of proposal does not suffice Azerbaijan
which is said to be in serious bargains with Russia. That’s thought
to be the only reason of the delay in talks, though the paper claims
that the meeting is certain to take place sometime in the future.

Armenian News – Tert.am

From: Baghdasarian

MP: Great Britain Has Made Large Investments In Azerbaijan And Is Bo

MP: GREAT BRITAIN HAS MADE LARGE INVESTMENTS IN AZERBAIJAN AND IS BOUND IN KARABAKH ISSUE (VIDEO)

16:15 | July 15,2014 | Politics

Several members of the Armenia-Great Britain Friendship Group are
satisfied with their recent visit to London. Talking to reporters in
Yerevan, Head of the Armenian delegation Tevan Poghosyan said during
the visit, they discussed political and economic issues.

British are greatly interested in Armenia’s foreign policy, especially
Armenia’s upcoming membership to the Eurasian Economic Union and
Customs Union.

Karine Achemyan, a lawmaker from the ruling Republican Party of
Armenia (HHK), says although the British side is not much delighted
with the choice of Armenia, they fully understand the situation. “Our
colleagues in London accepted our proposals and promised to help.

Given the Karabakh issue Armenia cannot put aside its interests and
always speaks from that position during meetings and discussions that
take place on the international level,” she said.

Artsvik Minasyan, another member of the group and a lawmaker from the
Armenian Revolutionary Federation -Dashnaktsutyun, emphasizes Great
Britain’s interest in our region. “England has made large investments
in Azerbaijan, therefore it feels bound to act in favour of Armenia.

It is important that we present our package as counterbalance and in
order to improve partnership with Great Britain,” he stressed.

The British side was particularly concerned about Armenia’s
participation and voting in international processes. Tevan Poghosyan
once again underlined that Armenia cannot vote for a document which
only focuses on a country’s territorial integrity as an international
right. “Armenia has always voted for documents which did not pay
attention to the right of nations to self-determination,” he said.

From: Baghdasarian

http://en.a1plus.am/1193502.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4lP21-zZgY

Giving Turkey A Dose Of Its Own Medicine?

GIVING TURKEY A DOSE OF ITS OWN MEDICINE?

By YONAH JEREMY BOB
07/14/2014 09:12

Israeli NGO assists Cypriots in filing war crimes complaint against
Turkey over occupation.

GIANT Turkish flag is seen displayed on the side of a mountain
near Nicosia in Turk-occupied Cyprus Photo: reuters An Israeli NGO
has assisted Cypriots in filing a war crimes complaint with the
International Criminal Court prosecutor against Turkey over its
occupation of Northern Cyprus. The complaint, filed on Tuesday and
referred to as a communication, was made on the 40th anniversary of
Turkey’s occupation of the northern part of Cyprus.

The NGO, Shurat HaDin-Israel Law Center, has been involved in a wide
range of human-rights cases and substantially assisted in researching
and drafting the complaint on behalf of Greek Cypriot groups, including
Cypriots Against Turkish War Crimes (CATWR) and MEP Costas Mavrides.

CATWR is an association comprised mainly of Cypriots and refugees
from the Turkish invasion of Cyprus.

The petitioners call on the ICC prosecutor to open an investigation
into ongoing alleged Turkish crimes against Cyprus, in particular
the continued maintenance and establishment of Turkish settlements
in the occupied territory.

The complaint alleges that “the Turkish occupation is one of the most
brazen settlement enterprises in modern times.”

Around 50,000 Turkish citizens lived in the now Turkish part of
Cyprus in 1996. Since then, as a result of Turkey’s aggressive
policies – including alleged forced “displacement” of Cypriots from
their homes and the alleged “murder or disappearances of thousands
of Greek Cypriots” – have increased the number of Turkish settlers
to 100,000, who now constitute around half of the population in the
self-proclaimed Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.

The communication describes the Turkish government’s systematic
policy to bolster its control over Northern Cyprus, encouraging
ethnic Turkish immigration while acting aggressively to transfer
native Cypriots out of the territory.

The case could have vast repercussions as it puts Turkey on the
defensive in the arena of lawfare – waging war against adversaries
through law – for the first time, an arena that Turkey has routinely
tried to use against Israel.

Turkey has sponsored war crimes trials against Israelis in its own
country relating to the Mavi Marmara raid in 2010, and reportedly
sponsored the Comoros Islands’ May 2013 complaint to the ICC against
Israelis.

At the same time, some might question the wisdom of setting
anti-settlement precedents by going after Turkey for settlement and the
removal of locals from an “occupied” territory in light of threats by
the Palestinians to go after Israel before the ICC on its settlements.

Shurat HaDin said the two situations are “apples and oranges.”

Regarding the complaint against Turkey, even if neither the UN Security
Council nor a state party – in this case Cyprus – officially asks for
a war crimes investigation, the ICC prosecutor can still initiate
an investigation and eventually an indictment if provided with a
complaint which applies to an ICC member state.

Cyprus joined the ICC upon its establishment in 2002 and since no
nation besides Turkey itself recognizes the legitimacy of Turkish
sovereignty in Northern Cyprus, the petitioners say the ICC has
jurisdiction over any crimes committed in occupied Cyprus.

A statement regarding the complaint said the demand for a war crimes
investigation seeking to “end the impunity Turkey has enjoyed for
its criminal conduct since it invaded the island Republic on July 20,
1974” was unprecedented.

The complaint points out that Turkey’s settlement activity since 1974
– but more importantly since 2002, which is the earliest year for
which the ICC can prosecute – in Northern Cyprus is “well documented,”
having been declared as illegal by the European Court of Human Rights
and the UN.

The statement added that despite this illegality, “and despite its
occupation of an EU member state, Turkey and its leaders have avoided
any legal consequences for their crimes.”

It said an investigation by the ICC prosecutor would be the “first
attempt to shine the harsh light of international criminal justice
on the Turkish occupation.”

Among the many obstacles to successfully moving forward with an
investigation is the fact that the ICC only handles a short list of
war crimes specified in its governing Rome Statute, which went into
effect in 2002.

The complaint claims that Turkey is in “blatant and systematic
violation” of Article 8(2)(b)(viii) of the Rome Statute, which
prohibits an occupying power from directly or indirectly transferring
its civilians into the occupied territory – that is, importing
settlers.

The petitioners contend that Turkey has “openly done just that
continuously since the invasion.” They allege that Turkey has actively
recruited, encouraged and transported Turks from rural areas of the
mainland to come settle the occupied territory.

Moreover, they argue that the current “demographic magnitude of the
settler establishment threatens the feasibility” of a negotiated
solution to the conflict.

According to Mavrides, “the settlement and other crimes committed in
the occupied part of Cyprus by Turkish officers is not a political
issue. It is a matter of international law and justice.”

“Now, it is up to the ICC to investigate the facts and decide in favor
of civilization and human rights,” he said, adding that hopefully
the ICC would bring “the criminals to justice.”

As a boy Mavrides was forced to flee Northern Cyprus along with his
family in the face of the Turkish invasion, and his home area has
remained under Turkish occupation ever since.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/Giving-Turkey-a-dose-of-its-own-medicine-362668

‘I Was A Separatist Fighter In Ukraine’

‘I WAS A SEPARATIST FIGHTER IN UKRAINE’

Artur Gasparyan, 24, is from Spitak in Armenia. In May, he says he
was recruited in Moscow to fight in eastern Ukraine. Now back in the
Russian capital, he spoke to Mumin Shakirov

Mumin Shakirov for RFE/RL, part of the New East network
theguardian.com, Tuesday 15 July 2014 05.00 BST

Gasparyan during his time in the Vostok battalion Photograph:
Artur Gasparyan

You expressed interest in going to Ukraine on a forum on the social
network Vkontakte after you read about the fire in the Odessa Trade
Union building in which 42 pro-Moscow separatists died. What happened
next?

About 10 guys showed up at a meeting somewhere near VDNKh [the
All-Russian Exhibition Centre in northern Moscow]. We spoke in the
entrance arch of a residential building there. A Slavic man in civilian
clothes who didn’t give his name met with us.

First, he asked us whether we knew how to handle weapons. He warned us
that we would be going to [the eastern Ukrainian city of] Slavyansk,
that we were heading to certain death, that the punishment for looting
was execution on the spot, which, by the way, I saw was true several
times while I was in Ukraine. Two men immediately walked away.

Did they promise you money?

They didn’t promise a per diem or payment. Only free food, clothing,
weapons, and a guarantee that they would transport our bodies to
Rostov-on-Don and give them to our relatives. If, of course, they
found them. They insisted that we destroy all our online accounts and,
in general, remove any personal information from social networks. I
deleted my accounts on [Russian social-media sites] Vkontakte and
Odnoklassniki.

How did you get to the Ukrainian border?

On the morning of 12 May, the group got into two cars and headed
south. It took about 24 hours to get to Rostov. It turned out that
the drivers were also volunteers. One of them, by the way, was killed.

They took us to a camp – some small homes near a creek and a forest –
I don’t know where. They took away all our road maps. Our telephones
and other personal things were logged and taken away. We changed into
clothes they gave us.

How long were you at this camp?

Nearly two weeks. Every day, more and more new people came. By the
end, there were about 100 of us. We didn’t rest at all; it was a
military schedule. We got up, we went for a run, we had breakfast,
we had training, we did orienteering in the fields, in the forest. We
learned the hand signals.

What do you mean, hand signals?

They taught us to communicate using gestures and signs in order
to recognise each other, to communicate silently at night, to give
commands like back, forward, stop, get down, danger, and so on. Now
I can speak with my hands like a deaf person. All this was taught
by an instructor in civilian clothes. He, like all the other big and
small bosses, didn’t give his name. We didn’t even know one another’s
real names, just nicknames. Even now I don’t know the names of most
of the guys who were killed beside me in that hell.

Did you have any combat experience before Ukraine? You were in the
breakaway Azerbaijani region of Nagorno-Karabakh…

Mostly we just had some exchanges of fire, automatic weapons or
grenade launchers. In short, it was a low-level war of positioning.

Nonetheless, I knew more about war than most of the guys there.

Were there Russian nationalists among them?

I didn’t see any nationalists, although most of the guys there were
Slavs. Whether they were Belarusians, Russians, or Ukrainian, I can’t
say. They were good, patriotic guys. None of them looked at me funny
because I’m Armenian.

There were a bunch of guys from the Caucasus, some Armenians from
Krasnodar and [the Ukrainian city of] Kryvyi Rih. Some Chechens came
a little later. I became friends with a few – one guy named Red and
another named Small. Both of them were killed in those KamAZ trucks.

How did you cross the border?

Near midnight on 23 May we left the base, about 100 guys in KamAZ
trucks. We were accompanied by a guide in a Niva [Russian-made jeep].

We rode for several hours and stopped at the border. There we joined
up with another 50 guys from other camps and we were given our weapons:
grenade launchers, automatic rifles, pistols, and grenades.

Then we got back into the trucks.

Did they teach you to shoot?

Some of the guys knew how to fire grenade launchers. I was made the
commander of a machine-gun squad of from three to six guys. They gave
me that job after looking over my military-service document. I guess
there are some numerical codes there that I never noticed before. When
they called me, they asked me to read the code. So they knew how to use
my training. Apparently they worked separately with everyone like that.

Gasparyan (right) with other Vostok fighters Photograph: Artur
Gasparyan

What do you mean “they”? Were they Federal Security Service, military
intelligence (GRU), Interior Ministry? Who were these people who met
you, trained you, crossed the border with you?

I don’t know their names, even their first names. They looked like
Slavs. They were all in civilian clothes. I don’t even remember
their faces.

When did you cross the border?

It was around dawn on 24 May. On the Ukrainian side, we were met
by some high-level representatives of the [self-proclaimed] Donetsk
People’s Republic. They had taken over some military base in Donetsk
and they put us up in a barracks there. We slept the whole day. Then
we washed up, got ourselves in order.

The next day, 25 May, we took part in the well-known parade in the
city in our KamAZ trucks – the one that the Chechens made famous. They
gave interviews, fired their weapons into the air, posed for the
cameras. People were cheering and they greeted the volunteers from
Russia like liberators. In the evening, we returned to our barracks.

And when did you first see combat?

They sounded the alarm on the night of 25-26 May. There were three
guys in my group, from Moscow, Lipetsk, and Chukotka. They were all
killed. We were put in civilian buses and taken to the airport. All
100 of us went into the building and there we joined up with some
Ossetians. The passengers were quickly evacuated, but employees
remained at their posts. In the morning, two planes landed and we
didn’t interfere with the work of the airport. The building was
quickly taken under control.

We positioned ourselves on every floor. My assistant and I were on
the seventh floor – the roof. We were ordered to cover a high area
about half a kilometre away so that no one else could be there. We
set up a machine gun.

What was the point of seizing a civilian airport in Donetsk? The
fighting at that time was in a completely different place, near
Slavyansk.

To prevent them from sending in troops from Kiev. They told us no one
would fire at us. Just pose for the cameras and that’s all. They would
see us, get scared, give up. We’d disarm everyone and send them home.

The airport would be ours.

Who do you mean?

The Ukrainian troops around the airport. There was gossip that
supposedly we were so tough and everyone was afraid of us. But it
turned out just the opposite.

At 2pm the helicopters came. Then the airplanes, and they started
bombing the place. I was on the roof and with my aide, I managed to get
to the sixth floor. It was a big attack – I counted four helicopters
and two planes.

Did you have mobile antiaircraft weapons?

Our commander from the Vostok battalion [of volunteer fighters from
Russia], Alexander Khodakovsky [regional head of the elite Alfa special
forces under former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych], told us
they wouldn’t bomb the airport and that “zenits” [shoulder-launched
anti-aircraft weapons] wouldn’t be necessary. So we left them at the
base. Khodakovsky’s snipers were there.

Pro-Russian militants on the roof of the international airport of
the eastern Ukrainian city of Donetsk on 26 May, 2014. Photograph:
Alexander Khudoteply/AFP/Getty Images

There were agents of the Ukrainian SBU Security Service who had
come over to the Donetsk People’s Republic. They had unusual rifles
that I’d never seen before – not Dragunov sniper rifles. They left
somewhere at about 1pm and the bombing started at 2pm.

What happened on your floor?

One Chechen was killed on the roof immediately. Two others were
wounded. They fired on the helicopters with everything they had. It
took me two or three seconds to get up there. I fired on the high area
from where a sniper was shooting at us. They forced us tightly into the
building and were bombing from all sides. They had missile launchers
around the perimeter of the airport and were firing on the terminal.

Khodakovsky naively thought that since the airport was new – just
opened for the European soccer championships [in 2012] – they wouldn’t
use heavy weapons on it. If we had only had our antiaircraft weapons,
none of that would have happened.

Do you think it was betrayal or incompetence?

I don’t know. We lost a lot of men. One of the Chechens – a really
smart guy -threw a couple of smoke bombs onto the roof and managed
to drag his wounded comrades out. We made our way down to the first
floor and were just sitting there, waiting to be killed.

Spark told me: “If you question the order, I’ll shoot you here.” I
took my weapon and got in.

We couldn’t go outside. Someone contacted the commander – a guy called
Spark – and we were given the order to get into the trucks. It was
nearly evening. The trucks were standing inside – in the terminal. I
didn’t want to get in. I knew how risky it was. Spark told me: “If you
question the order, I’ll shoot you here.” I took my weapon and got in.

How many men were in the truck?

There were two trucks with about 30-35 men in each one. A covering
squad remained in the airport. They went out on foot at night –
they all got away. Spark gave the order to drive out of the terminal
and to fire in all directions at anything that moved. We lifted the
covers – they were open trucks stuffed with volunteers. Our truck
flew out of the terminal and we begin to fire on both sides, up in
the air, everywhere. We proceeded along a road for about four or five
kilometres. The trucks were about 500 or 600 metres apart. Two trucks
speeding along, firing without stopping. It was terrifying.

A Ukrainian helicopter Mi-24 gunship fires decoy flares over
a residential area moments after attacking Donetsk international
airport on 26 May, 2014. Photograph: Yannis Behrakis/Reuters

It’s true that I stopped firing when I saw that there was no one
there. When we arrived in the city, we saw that the first truck was
standing in the road. I didn’t understand what had happened. Cars
were driving around it and people were standing around – it was the
edge of Donetsk.

There were dead and wounded there?

We rushed pass at high speed. I didn’t manage to look. Someone was
still shooting. After about 500 metres, someone fired on our truck
with a grenade launcher. The shell landed in the driver’s cabin. We
thought we’d been lucky, so we jumped out. We got bruised up a little,
but no one was hurt. The truck that they hit first got caught in a
crossfire from machine guns. There were also snipers firing at them.

At least 30 men died there, no fewer.

Then they began firing on us too from somewhere. I dropped my weapon
and grabbed one wounded guy from Crimea. I loaded him on my back and
ran blindly through some yards. Our medic found us. He had a weapon,
so I took it and started firing in all directions, up onto the roofs.

And I ran further with the wounded guy.

Did you know who controlled the city?

We were sure the city had been taken by the National Guard and that
they were looking for us. We came to an ambulance depot and I fired
toward the roof a couple of times to attract their attention. My
comrade was bleeding badly. He’d been shot in the arm and the leg. I
shouted to the medics: “Save him! Help!” A woman shouted back: “Don’t
worry, we are on your side!” We put the Crimean into an ambulance
and they took him to a hospital. I told them where the trucks were
and six ambulances rushed out. Soon they were bringing guys from the
trucks to the hospital.

Someone told me that only three guys survived from the first truck.

There was panic and terror. Someone told me that one guy blew himself
up with a grenade to avoid being taken prisoner by the Ukrainians.

They didn’t understand that they were being attacked by their own
people. Someone apparently told local militiamen that Right Sector
[a Ukrainian nationalist group that was part of the Maidan protest
movement] fighters were rushing down the highway in two trucks.

What was the official story?

On television they said something like the militias were transporting
unarmed wounded under the sign of the red cross and Ukrainian forces
fired on them. At that point, I still didn’t know we’d been attacked
by our own forces. I was sure it was the National Guard. Sometime in
the morning of the 27th, two guys from the cover group that remained
at the airport woke me up. They told me that it was friendly fire.

Alexander Khodakovsky, commander of the Vostok battalion, near Donetsk,
eastern Ukraine, on 1 June 2014. Photograph: Valentina Svistunova/EPA

We were asking what to do next. We decided to run away during the
night, secretly, on foot, back to the border and to Russia. We found
some civilian clothes, changed into them, took some backpacks and
left the unit. There was a driver with us who went by “Shumakher.” He
told us that he had an uncle outside of Donetsk. Six of us arrived at
this private house to spend the night. On the morning of the 28th,
we heard shouts from a neighbouring house: “Don’t shoot! Don’t kill
us!” It turned out they sent a squad out after us.

How did they find you?

I don’t know. Maybe someone gave us away. We threw away our packs
and other things and ran off again. We were just wandering around
the streets without any money or documents. We came to a town and a
checkpoint and told them our story. They took us from the checkpoint
to Horlivka [a city in eastern Ukraine’s Donetsk Oblast] to a commander
by the name of “Devil.” But that’s a different story.

Why did you spend two weeks with “Devil”?

We didn’t have any choice. I didn’t know how to get away. Devil turned
out to be a normal guy, a professional soldier from Horlivka. He
promised to send us back to Russia at the first opportunity. All five
of us stayed with him. We told them what had happened to us, and he
said he wouldn’t turn us over to the “easterners.” He left us alone.

Later, if anyone wanted to fight some more, they stayed. But I left.

What did you do in Horlivka from 28 May until 15 June?

I put on a uniform again. We were given weapons and took part in
several operations. They were better organised, more systematic. We
carried out some diversions – snuck around, blew something up, snuck
away. We blew up a Ukrainian fuelling post in Dokuchayevsk. We snuck
in quietly during the night in civilian cars. I covered the position
with a machine gun and they blew up the post with a grenade launcher.

Why did you blow up the fuel depot?

So they couldn’t gas up their tanks and trucks.

But didn’t you need fuel?

We didn’t have any vehicles. Stuff like that only appeared among the
militias about three days after I left.

What stories on television that you’ve seen strike you as the most
outrageous and disturbing?

When they do interviews with people from the Donetsk People’s Republic
[DNR in Russian]. The DNR is really a fiction. The DNR, as I understand
it, exists only in the offices of [self-proclaimed DNR Prime Minister
Alexander] Borodai, [self-proclaimed DNR parliament speaker Denis]
Pushilin, [former Ukrainian parliament deputy Oleh] Tsaryov. But
decisions are made somewhere else and by other people.

Pro-Russian separatist fighters from the Vostok battalion in Donetsk
on 10 July, 2014. Photograph: Maxim Zmeyev/Reuters

Journalists who have been in the region say that about 20% of those
fighting are Russians and the other 80% are local militias

I’d say exactly the opposite. Most of them are Russians, Chechens,
Ingush. There are also Armenians like me. I spoke to some locals and
they say that they did what they’d been told. I said, “What did they
tell you to do?” They answered: “We voted. The rest is up to you.”

That is, they participated in the referendum on DNR independence but
they don’t intend to fight. One guy told me, “I want to get my pay and
then drink until my next payday.” In general, they have no experience.

Don’t know how to handle weapons. No one had been in the military. I’m
talking about in Donetsk.

And in Horlivka?

There, it is about 50-50. But the Russians fight better. They are
people who have been in the military. It is a real army – Ukraine
hasn’t [really] had an army for 23 years.

Why are you telling us all this?

Until now, the people who – basically – betrayed us (what happened at
the airport could have been avoided and everything could have been
different if they had organised it right) are still giving orders,
and volunteers from Russia are still going to serve with them. I want
these people to understand who is going to be commanding them. I went.

I survived by a miracle. I feel sorry for them. They are on their way
to serve such commanders as Khodakovsky and others. I don’t know all
their names.

How did you get back to Russia?

Devil kept his word. He thanked us, gave us each 1,000 hryvnyas for
the road, wished us luck, and sent us home. Three guys came with me.

One who was wounded and two others. We rode in civilian cars through
Luhansk Oblast, avoiding the customs point, about 150 kilometres. We
were met on the Russian side and they took us to Rostov. We ended up at
the same base where we’d been trained. They gave us back our clothes,
documents, telephones, some money for the road, and sent us home.

You are a citizen of Armenia, from another country….

I even fought under the Armenian flag. I have photos.

Why would you be willing to die for a foreign country?

I don’t consider Russia a foreign country. I have the mentality of a
Soviet person. My grandfathers fought for the Soviet Union and I am
fighting for it. I don’t consider Russia a foreign country.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/15/separatist-fighter-russia-eastern-ukraine-interview

Domains In Armenian Script May Be Introduced In The Near Future

DOMAINS IN ARMENIAN SCRIPT MAY BE INTRODUCED IN THE NEAR FUTURE

19:09 14.07.2014

Artak Barseghyan
Public Radio of Armenia

Radical changes are expected in the field of Internet governance. The
issues of development and management of Internet were discussed at
a recent conference of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names
and Numbers (ICANN) in London.

In particular, the US authorities intend to transfer the governance
of Internet domains to an independent body.

Vice-President of the “Internet Community” NGO Grigor Saghyan presented
the results of this decision to reporters today. He said the domain
in Armenian script could be implemented by the end of the current
year. It will be operational parallel to the .am domain.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.armradio.am/en/2014/07/14/domains-in-armenian-script-may-be-introduced-in-the-near-future/

No Plans For Uniting Armenia And Eurasian Economic Union Member Coun

NO PLANS FOR UNITING ARMENIA AND EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION MEMBER COUNTRIES’ INTERNET SPACE

YEREVAN, July 14. /ARKA/. Grigory Sahiyan, deputy chairman of the
Internet Society nongovernmental organization, told journalists on
Monday that there were no plans for uniting Armenia and the Eurasian
Economic Union member countries’ Internet space.

He said there was no talk about that in discussions over Armenia’s
accession to the Customs Union and there no such a requirement was
put to Armenia, all the more so it would be quite difficult to put
Armenian national Internet in tune with Cyrillic.

Sahiyan said that this is not a top-priority direction for Armenia,
since Russia’s key resources Yandex, VKontakte, Odnoklassniki and
Kaspersky, which has only a one-percent influence in the world’s
Internet.

Nevertheless, cooperation in information technology area still exists,
he said, especially in cyber security, and this is specified by the
Collective Security Treaty Organization.

On May 29, at a session of Eurasian Economic Council in Astana,
Kazakhstan, the Armenian president expressed Yerevan’s intention to
join the Eurasian Economic Union agreement until June 15. However,
appropriate papers have not been signed so far.

On July 1, Russian President Vladimir Putin, speaking at a meeting
of Russian diplomats, said Armenian will become a full member of the
union very soon.

In resent days, media outlets quoted Kazakh Foreign Minister Yerlan
Idrisov as saying that the agreement between Armenia and Eurasian
Economic Union is likely to be signed in October 2014 at a regular
meeting of Eurasian Economic Union countries’ presidents in Minsk.

—0—-

– See more at:

From: Baghdasarian

http://telecom.arka.am/en/news/internet/no_plans_for_uniting_armenia_and_eurasian_economic_union_member_countries_internet_space/#sthash.iyLadlNU.dpuf

Erosi Kitsmarishvili Found Dead In Tbilisi

EROSI KITSMARISHVILI FOUND DEAD IN TBILISI

19:57 | July 15,2014 | Politics

Georgian politician and media investor Erosi Kitsmarishvili was found
dead in Tbilisi on Tuesday.

His body was found inside his car near his flat on Chavchavadze Avenue
in Tbilisi. The Ministry of Internal Affairs immediately launched an
investigation into what appears to have been a suicide. According to
the MIA, Kitsmarishvili had a wound to his head and his pistol was
discovered in the car.

Kitsmarishvili was known as the founder of Rustavi 2, the largest
private TV Company in Georgia, and Ambassador to the Russian
Federation.

In the June 15 local elections, Kitsmarishvili was a candidate for
Mayor in his hometown Rustavi, a city of about 100,000 people south
of Tbilisi. He came third with 12 percent of votes, too little to
proceed to the second round.

The first round was won by the Georgian Dream candidate with 40
percent and the National Movement candidate received 29 percent.

A1+ Company expresses condolences to the family, friends and colleagues
of Kitsmarishvili. During his term of office, A1+ closely cooperated
with Rustavi 2.

From: Baghdasarian

http://en.a1plus.am/1193537.html

US Ambassador-Designate To Turkey Urges For Stronger Relationship Wi

US AMBASSADOR-DESIGNATE TO TURKEY URGES FOR STRONGER RELATIONSHIP WITH ARMENIA

July 15, 2014 | 19:29

U.S. Ambassador-Designate to Turkey John Bass believes the instability
along Turkey’s southernborder gives renewed urgency for Ankara to
build stronger relationships with other neighbors – Israel, Armenia,
and Cyprus.

Speaking during the hearings in Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
Bass said one issue that confronts all democracies as they look to
the future is how they deal with the past.

“We continue to encourage Turkey and Armenia to move towards
normalization as a means of creating the peaceful, productive and
prosperous relationship that the people of both countries deserve,”
the diplomat said.

John Bass recalled that on this year’s Remembrance Day, Prime
Minister Erdogan expressed his condolences to the grandchildren of
those Armenians killed during World War I.

“That gesture and other positiveefforts by the Turkish government in
recent months indicate that the space for dialogue is opening. But
more can be done, and we encourage both sides to pursue a full, frank,
and just acknowledgement of the facts surrounding the tragic events
of 1915,” he emphasized.

From: Baghdasarian

http://news.am/eng/news/219245.html

"Russia Loves Cuba 300 Times More Than Armenia"

“RUSSIA LOVES CUBA 300 TIMES MORE THAN ARMENIA”

Tuesday 15 July 2014 13:42

Political scientist Stepan Grigoryan

Yerevan /Mediamax/. Political scientist Stepan Grigoryan said today
that Russia has recently forgiven Cuba a debt amounting to USD 30bln
when years ago it did not forgive Armenia’s debt to the tune of USD
100mln and took several enterprises in return.

The political scientist stated that considering this fact he has
concluded “Russia loves Cuba 300 times more than it loves Armenia”.

According to him, Armenia should draw lessons of realism from Russia.

“Armenia should make an official statement declaring that since nobody
is waiting for us in the Eurasian Economic Union, we are restoring
our relations with the EU within the Association Agreement”, noted
Stepan Grigoryan.

Answering the question as to whether Europe will take such a decision
seriously, he stated that despite the disappointment Europe has
to Armenia there will by all means be states supporting Armenia to
restore the faith of the rest of states to us.

“Until September 3, 2013 Russia was committed to persuading Armenia
not to sign the Association Agreement promising large amounts to the
tune of USD 12-15bln in case of taking the way to the Customs Union.

Apparently, Russia cheated us. The Armenian President’s latest speech
in which he voiced concerns regarding Russia’s supply of weapons to
Azerbaijan proves it”, said the political scientist adding that the
authorities do not work properly with Russia.

He pointed out that the purchase of weapons from Russia sparks
excitement in Azerbaijan and the recent activities observed on the
contact line are the result of it.

“Realizing that it can spark interest among Azerbaijan by using
the lever of Karabakh Russia did not wish to include Armenia in the
Eurasian Economic Union and is currently waiting for Azerbaijan’s
response. The two-fold increase of the number of casualties on the
contact line compared to previous years comes to prove it. Over
the first six months of 2014 the number of casualties both parties
suffered has exceeded the number of casualties registered in 2013”,
said Stepan Grigoryan adding that alternative levers are required to
reappear in the focus of interest of Russia.

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.mediamax.am/en/news/foreignpolicy/10962/