BAKU: Azerbaijan, Armenia to build new HPS

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Jan 12 2005

Azerbaijan, Armenia to build new HPS

A new hydropower station will be constructed over the Araz River,
close to Ordubad district of Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic, on own
expenses of the Azerbaijani government. Views were exchanged on the
issue in a meeting of the Azerbaijani-Iranian economic commission
held on January 8-10, a source from the Azerenergy open joint-stock
company told AssA-Irada.
According to chief engineer of Azerenergy Marlen Asgarov, the
necessity of developing the feasibility study of the new hydropower
station by the end of this year was stressed during the meeting.
The Armenian side has also decided to use the water potential of the
Araz River jointly with Iran. The two countries’ energy ministers
have been assigned to lead the intergovernmental commission, which is
to coordinate the construction of the Mehri hydropower station over
the Araz River.
The commission has approved the feasibility study of the station, the
construction of which requires at least $120 million according to
initial estimations.
Some experts say that part of the Araz River, which passes through
the Armenian-Iranian border, is unfit for construction of a
hydropower station. Therefore, the mentioned station is planned to be
built over the river section crossing across the occupied lands of
Azerbaijan.*
From: Baghdasarian

BAKU: Azeris protest at “pro-Armenian” Dutch documentary

Azeris protest at “pro-Armenian” Dutch documentary

Bilik Dunyasi news agency, Baku
12 Jan 05

BAKU

A short-length documentary by Dutch filmmaker (?Susan Kroeger), “Hope
dies last”, has caused serious discontent of Azerbaijani diaspora
organizations in the Netherlands.

The press service of the state committee for Azerbaijanis living
abroad said that the documentary tells a story of three Armenian and
two Azerbaijani soldiers who went missing in the Karabakh war during
the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict. After its presentation in
Amsterdam, over 100 members of the Dutch-Azerbaijani society and
Azerbaijani diaspora organizations exchanged views on the developments
in the documentary with representatives of the Dutch Council of
Churches and the Dutch Red Cross Society. Members of Armenian diaspora
organizations also joined the debates. Our compatriots strongly
protested at the facts that the narration and the end of the
documentary are related to Armenia and 21 minutes of the documentary
are about Armenia and only eight minutes about Azerbaijan.

Other causes of discontent were the choice of music, a sharp
disproportion in the presentation of the parents of the missing
soldiers, the video of Armenian and Azerbaijani cities and reference
to towns and villages in Karabakh using Armenian names.

During the debates, the Azerbaijanis strongly condemned the film and
said that its content was inaccurate and pro-Armenian. They stressed
that it was inadmissible to demonstrate such a film. Dutch experts
also supported our compatriots.
From: Baghdasarian

BAKU: Azeri, Armenian foreign ministers to meet in Prague next week

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Jan 6 2005

Azeri, Armenian foreign ministers to meet in Prague next week

Azerbaijani and Armenian foreign ministers Elmar Mammadyarov and
Vardan Oskanian will meet in Prague for the fifth time on January 11.

The two ministers will focus on certain issues pertaining to the
Upper Garabagh conflict settlement, Deputy Foreign Minister and the
President’s special envoy on Upper Garabagh Araz Azimov said.
Azimov noted that Armenia’s policy of illegal settlement of
population in the occupied lands of Azerbaijan will be discussed. The
parties will also consider issues related to the visit by the OSCE
fact-finding mission to the region scheduled for late January-early
February.
The last Prague meeting of the two foreign ministers took place in
spring 2004, while the meeting originally scheduled for September had
been postponed on a request of the Armenian side.
The two ministers also held talks in Berlin in November, in Sofia
early in December and later in Brussels.*
From: Baghdasarian

Oligarchs could provide about 75% of state budget income

OLIGARCHS COULD PROVIDE ABOUT 75% OF STATE BUDGET INCOME

PanArmenian News
Dec 22 2004

22.12.2004 17:12

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ “$270-290 million annually elude the state budget”,
Haykakan Zhamanak Armenian newspaper writes today according to the
International Monetary Fund report on poverty reduction and economic
growth in Armenia. The data shows that principal Armenian taxpayers,
who replenish state budget income with 23%, could potentially provide
about 75% of total income. There are 350 taxpayers in the country,
the paper continues, due to the budget for fiscal year 2005 they are
to pay 70 billion AMD. However proceeding from the IMF calculations
the figure could make 200 billion. Thus 130-140 billion AMD elude
the state budget every year, Haykakan Zhamanak sums up.
From: Baghdasarian

Christian Martyrs: Witnesses for the World

Zenit News Agency, Italy
Dec 22 2004

Christian Martyrs: Witnesses for the World

Says Secretary of Congregation for Sainthood Causes

VATICAN CITY, DEC. 21, 2004 (Zenit.org).- Because of the values
they incarnated, Christian martyrs are the patrimony of the whole of
humanity, not only of the Church, says a Vatican official.

Archbishop Edward Nowak, secretary of the Congregation for Sainthood
Causes, made that point during an address at the inauguration of
the new academic year of the “Studium” of the Vatican dicastery,
held at the Patristic Institute Augustinianum.

The “Studium” was established 20 years ago in response to the need to
form people specialized in carrying forward a cause of canonization,
from the first phases. Until last year, the studies were carried out
by more than 1,600 people.

The text of the monsignor’s introduction, with the title in Italian
“The Church Is Again the Church of Martyrs,” was issued earlier this
month by L’Osservatore Romano.

“The century that has just ended was presented as a time of very many
martyrs. Some historians say that, in the 20th century, Christianity
experienced the greatest persecution of its history,” the prelate
noted.

According to John Paul II, “at the end of the second millennium,
the Church is again the Church of martyrs, the persecutions against
believers, priests, religious and laity have produced a great sowing
of martyrs in different parts of the world.”

Martyrdom always has formed a part of the life of the Church,
Archbishop Nowak said. He mentioned for example the persecution of
the Armenian people, the Spanish and Mexican martyrs, and the victims
of the Nazi and Communist eras, as well as the present time.

“The martyrs are, in the first place, an inestimable and precious
value in itself for the Church herself,” he said. “In the second
place, they are bearers of a great message. Their martyrdom is above
all the testimony of faith and of the Church.

“In particular, the martyr is a witness who has undertaken the
following of Christ, to the giving up of his life, in order to witness
to the truth of the Gospel.”

The Vatican official said that martyrdom is “the scandal, the absurd,
the paradox of Christianity. From a martyr who was killed, other
faithful were born, hundreds, thousands. There is no reasonable
explanation. Perhaps there is one, namely the person of Christ, his
defeat on the cross, which generated Christianity, and millions and
millions of Christians in all ages.”

The secretary of the Congregation for Sainthood Causes added that
“the martyrs are also a great patrimony of humanity. These persons,
in civil language, are the heroes of society.”

“They incarnate values of civility, fidelity, solidarity, primacy
of conscience, primacy of being over having, heroism unto death,
forgiveness, and help,” he added. “Because of this, they are the most
beautiful and true pages of history. Not only those of the Church
but also of humanity.”
From: Baghdasarian

Air Transport 2002-2004

Kommersant, Russia
Dec 18 2004

Air Transport 2002-2004

Indicators for the Russian transportation system have steadily
improved in the last four years. For example, freight turnover
increased 7.9% compared to 2000. Last year, 285.7 million tons of
freight were shipped through Russian ports (compared to only 92.7
million tons through Baltic and Ukrainian ports). The increase in
freight volumes was mainly due to bulk cargo transport (oil and
petroleum products), which showed a 17.6% increase based on the
results of 2003 (compared to 1.5% for dry cargo).

Photo: Yury Martyanov

Indicators for air and rail transport also increased steadily,
averaging 10% per year. Domestic and international airlines carried
31 million people in 2003, which according to data of the RF State
Statistics Committee (Goskomstat) is 10.7% more than in 2002. In
2003, Russian railways transported 1.161 billion tons of freight
(7.1% more than in 2002) and 1.3 billion passengers (an increase of
2.6%).

At the same time, even according to official information, the
condition of transportation facilities and infrastructure leaves much
to be desired. For example, there are 18 291 vessels used in Russian
inland water transport but only 354 of them are less than 10 years
old. And only half of the 3830 airplanes and 1967 helicopters are
actually used. Depreciation of railway rolling stock is nearly 60%.

History: 2000–2004

During the first four years of Vladimir Putin’s presidency, many
transportation companies changed owners. Not without scandals, of
course; but these shifts essentially had no effect on the state of
the industry.

History of Aviation on the Ground

At present, there are 423 airports in Russia, almost all of them
state-owned. Despite the fact that the government promised last year
to get out of the airport business in the near future (this is
stipulated in Russia’s transportation strategy) and transfer airports
to private hands, Vladimir Putin’s first presidential term showed
that this process will be neither quick nor easy.

In June 2000, Aeroflot (51% state-owned) announced plans to construct
a third terminal at Sheremetevo International Airport (100%
state-owned). Aeroflot is Sheremetevo’s main carrier and knows better
than anyone that the airport’s traffic capacity and infrastructure
have not met real needs for a long time. However, things have not
progressed beyond leasing 50 ha of land in Khimkinsky District and a
pompous laying of the cornerstone. Aeroflot’s management and the
bureaucrats disagree on who should build the new terminal and manage
the existing one.

Last year, Alfa Group, which had previously never owned any
transportation assets, lobbied in Mikhail Kasyanov’s government for a
tender to select Sheremetevo’s management company for three years and
won it, beating out a consortium of Aeroflot and the National Reserve
Bank. At the time, Valery Okulov, Aeroflot’s general manager, even
threatened to change the company’s base airport, but the winner (OAO
Alfa Sheremetevo, 100% owned by Alfa Group affiliate Alfa-Eko M)
produced a group of foreign partners with whom it planned to tackle
Sheremetevo Airport. According to Igor Baranovsky, the head of Alfa
Sheremetevo, the amount of investment required to reconstruct and
modernize the airport and construct a third terminal is estimated at
$1.5-2 billion.

However, the tender results were not approved. Under pressure from
Aeroflot, Mikhail Fradkov’s government effectively disavowed them. In
early June, the prime minister instructed Aeroflot and Alfa Group to
reach an agreement on joint management of the airport. So far, they
have only determined the legal aspect of Aeroflot’s entry into the
management company. On July 6, Aeroflot’s board of directors approved
the following plan in principle: Alfa-Eko M and Aeroflot would set up
OOO Airport Management, to which they would transfer 100% of the
management company’s shares. The ratio of the partners’ stakes in the
new company remains an open question. The negotiations will probably
be protracted, and it is not inconceivable that the partners will use
their lobbying resources more than once to turn the situation to
their own advantage.

Vnukovo, Moscow’s third-largest airport after Sheremetevo and
Domodedovo in terms of passenger flows, was the first to actually be
privatized and was handed over by the federal authorities almost
without a fight. Until November 2003, 60.88% of the shares of AO
Vnukovo Airport (owns the Vnukovo 1 terminal) belonged to the RF
Ministry of State Property, but the Aviation Oil Company (ANK) had
actually been controlling all of Vnukovo’s airport business for a
long time. ANK refuses to disclose the ownership structure, but
according to some reports, the largest co-owners are the father and
son Anatoly and Vitaly Vantsev. The Vantsevs maintain that they only
own the manager’s block, the exact size of which is unknown.

ANK owns ZAO Vnukovo Invest [the owner of a second large block
(38.2%) of AO Vnukovo Airport], 75% of AO Vnukovo International
Airport (the remaining shares belong to the Moscow government), 60%
of ZAO Fuel Supply Complex (Toplivozapravochny kompleks;TZK), 50% of
ZAO Fuel Supply Company (Toplivozapravochnaya kompaniya), and more
than 50% of AO TZK Prima Fuel.

In April 2002, Moscow mayor Yury Luzhkov sent Vladimir Putin a
proposal to transfer shares of Vnukovo Airport against repayment of
arrears on subsidies to Moscow for carrying out its metropolitan
functions. A year later, the parties agreed in principle to transfer
the shares, worth an estimated $1.74 billion; and Vladimir Putin
signed the corresponding decree in November. According to Vitaly
Vantsev, OAO Vnukovo International Airport’s general manager, there
was no redistribution of the shares or their transfer to the
management of a single structure, as Vnukovo’s owners had originally
planned; however, OAO Vnukovo Airport was chosen as coordinator of
the modernization plan for the entire Vnukovo Airport complex with
the rank of management company. A total of $300 million is supposed
to be invested in Vnukovo by 2007 and another $200 million by 2008.

ANK also wants to buy the state-owned terminal at Sochi Airport,
where the company already has a fuel supply business. According to
Vlast’s information, the deal could be worth $70-80 million, with
provision of a further $30-40 million of investments. “This will
probably be by tender, and we’re planning to participate,” says
Vitaly Vantsev.

The Russian government’s transportation strategy assumes that
redistribution of airports will continue. Up to now, the airports
have not been separated from the 71 airlines (24 of these are joint
stock companies, and 47 are state unitary enterprises). Given that
sometimes the state owns only the runways and airport buildings but
business runs the private structures, the restructuring will not be
easy.

History of Aviation in the Air

There have been some overall changes in air traffic in the past four
years. As before, more than 200 companies are involved in this
business, but only five airlines account for half of all passenger
traffic: Aeroflot – Russian Airlines, Sibir, Pulkovo, Krasnoyarsk
Airlines, and UTair (formerly Tyumenaviatrans). Interestingly enough,
the state has stakes ranging from 25.5% to 100% in each of the five
leaders except UTair. In the experts’ estimation, this coupled with
the effect of more progressive private management has allowed the
carriers to become leaders.

Sibir, controlled by a couple from Novosibirsk, Vladislav (general
manager) and Natalya (his deputy) Filev, has been expanding its
business more aggressively than the others in the past four years.
Sibir’s expansion on the air transport market began with Vnukovo
Airlines (VAL), which was in second place in traffic volumes in the
mid-1990s, but by 2000 was virtually bankrupt. In 2001, Sibir’s
management announced the start of a merger of the companies. But when
it was discovered that VAL had debts of nearly 1 billion rubles and
creditors blocked the merger several times by legal means, Sibir
simply bought 37 of the Moscow carrier’s airplanes, which had
previously been moved to subsidiaries set up by VAL’s management.
Vnukovo Airlines was declared bankrupt in 2003.

In summer 2002, Sibir became a co-owner of Armavia Airlines founded
by a group of Armenian businessmen using leased Tu-134’s, Tu-154’s,
and a leased Airbus-A320. Sibir has still not officially confirmed
this information, calling cooperation with Armavia a “strategic
alliance”.

Finally, in May of this year, Sergei Yashin, a co-owner of
Chelyabinsk Airlines (ChAP), sold 54% of his company’s shares to
structures owned by Vladislav Filev. As a result, Sibir acquired
Chelyabinsk Airport, a fuel-supply facility, a fleet of 16 Tu-154,
Tu-134, and Yak-42 airplanes, and the means to increase passenger
flows by at least 500 000 people. Experts estimate that the deal was
worth $10 million. Yashin’s former partner and minority Chelyabinsk
Airlines shareholder, Evgeny Razumov, opposed the sale and the
arrival of new owners. The confrontation between the parties is
proceeding in the finest traditions of shareholders’ wars: reciprocal
lawsuits and seizures of Chelyabinsk Airport and the Moscow office of
ChAP subsidiary Enkor. Nevertheless, in early July, Sibir’s
management officially announced the start of operations at ChAP, and
the company has begun flights between Moscow and Chelyabinsk.

UTair, one of the world’s largest helicopter operators (184
machines), changed owners at the end of June when the Administration
of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Area (KhMAO) and the mayor of the city of
Surgut, who owned nearly 45% of UTair’s shares, sold their holdings.
The new owner has not been disclosed, but sources closely connected
with the deal say it is the oil company Surgutneftegaz. In fact, oil
companies make up a large proportion of UTair’s clients, and the
company has a well-developed infrastructure in a number of Russian
oil towns. Aleksandr Filipenko, the governor of KhMAO, strongly
recommended to oil companies that they buy the airline. Neither UTair
nor Surgutneftegaz has officially confirmed the deal, but according
to Andrei Martirosov, the airline’s general manager, the owner is a
company “well known in the autonomous area and outside”.

History of the Ports

The last four years have been notable for the mass arrival of new
owners at Russian ports – metallurgical, oil, chemical, coal, and
even agricultural companies have bought their shares. ZAO
Severstaltrans (SST) started the trend – Aleksei Mordashov, head of
the Severstal Group, and Konstantin Nikolaev, the head of
Severstaltrans, set up the company on a parity basis in 1996. The
peak of the new transportation company’s activity happened to
coincide with the past four years.

In 2001, SST began buying up shares of OAO Eastern Port (Vostochny
port), the largest port in the Far East, which had been controlled
for eight years by American businessman Kenneth Dart and his partner
Andrew Fox (they owned 36% of the shares). By the end of the summer,
SST had acquired nearly 60% of the shares; today it controls 68.64%.

Eastern Port is fourth in Russia’s hierarchy of ports. It is located
in deep-water, ice-free Wrangel Bay in the Sea of Japan and is
capable of handling large-capacity vessels (up to 150 000 tons). The
oil company Rosneft came here in April of last year. Rosneft’s board
of directors approved the acquisition of 100% of the shares of ZAO
Eastern Oil-Loading Terminal (Vostochny neftenalivnoi terminal; VNT)
from OAO Eastern Port. The deal is worth an estimated $18 million,
and Rosneft will have to invest about another $30 million to finish
building the terminal. After commissioning the first phase of VNT,
the company plans to export up to 4.5 million tons of petroleum
products per year through it.

In January 2002, Severstaltrans was the winner at a Russian Federal
Property Fund (RFFI) auction for the sale of 34% of the shares of
Taganrog Commercial Seaport (TMTP). The company paid 75.14 billion
rubles for one-third of TMTP, one of the so-called small ports on the
Sea of Azov with potential freight turnover of 1.5 million tons per
year. As a result, Severstaltrans became the largest port owner after
the state by consolidating 39% of the shares (51% of the voting
shares). A new 400 000-ton capacity grain berth went into operation
in the same year, and construction began on three more. But at the
end of the year, Severstaltrans sold its share block to grain trader
Karavai Plus Agroindustrial Corporation (APK Karavai Plus).

This year, SST got rid of another port asset acquired two years ago.
At the end of June, the company sold 69.4% of the shares of Tuapse
Commercial Seaport [Tuapsinsky MTP, on the Black Sea] to Novolipetsk
Iron and Steel Corporation (NLMK). The amount of the deal has not
been disclosed, but analysts believe the shares cost NLMK twice as
much as Severstal, which spent about $45 million on consolidating the
shares in 2002. Severstaltrans (port assets make up a fifth of all of
the holding’s assets) explained that it had sold the shares in order
to shift money to the railway sector, specifically towards the
purchase of rolling stock and locomotives.

NLMK in turn had been the only remaining Russian metallurgical
company without its own transportation assets. However, it quickly
got down to business and bought a controlling interest in OAO Port of
St. Petersburg (Morskoi port Sankt-Peterburg) from Nasdor Anstalt
(controlled by State Duma deputy Vitaly Yuzhilin and his partner
Andrei Kobzar). The amount of the deal has not been disclosed, but
market participants estimate it was worth at least $100 million.

Other companies also became port owners between 2002 and 2004,
including Magnitogorsk Metallurgical Plant (MMK, or Magnitka), which
bought about 23% of the shares of OAO Vladivostok Commercial Seaport
(Vladivostoksky MTP), Evrazholding [owns 91.5% of the shares of
Nakhodka Commercial Seaport (Nakhodsky MTP)], Mechel [80.2% of Poset
Commercial Port (Torgovy port Poset)], and AO Alliance Oil Company
[NK Alyans; owns a 65.84% share in the capital of Nakhodka Commercial
Petroleum Port (Nakhodsky neftenalivnoi MTP)]. Norilsk Nickel
(Nornikel) increased its stake in Archangelsk Commercial Seaport
(Arkhangelsky MTP) to 53%.

History of Shipping

Of Russia’s four largest shipping companies – Novoship, Sovkomflot,
and the Primorye and Far Eastern shipping companies – only the last
two have undergone changes. In June 2002, offshore companies closely
associated with ex-Minister of Fuel and Energy and ex-State Duma
deputy Sergei Generalov consolidated a 60% block of shares of Far
Eastern Shipping Company (DVMP), which specializes in worldwide
container traffic. The shares were acquired from a number of small
private investors.

The shipping company changed its general manager in September, when
Aleksandr Ambrosov from Sovkomflot replaced government representative
Aleksandr Lugovets, who until 2000 had been the deputy of former
Minister of Transport Sergei Frank. This can be considered a defeat
for the bureaucrats, since Frank had always zealously defended the
presence of government officials in large shipping companies. At the
last shareholders’ meeting, disputes broke out between the
representatives of majority shareholder S.V.G. Holding S.A. and the
government (20%) over the amount of dividends on the results of 2003.
The government insisted on increasing them, but the principal
shareholder thought it was better to direct profits to the reserve
fund and to upgrading DVMP’s fixed assets.

Primorye Shipping Company (PMP) did not change owners. Its management
headed by Aleksandr Kirilichev, which controlled nearly 70% of the
company’s shares, tried to protect it from a hostile takeover in
January 2003. In 2003, the entire block was transferred to a nominee
holding of depositaries of ZAO ING (Eurasia) and ZAO Depositary and
Clearing Company.

Magnify
A year later, Kirilichev, who had been at the helm of PMP for more
than 10 years, also faded into the background. His first deputy,
Aleskandr Popravko, became general manager in May of this year, and
Kirilichev decided to concentrate on solving strategic problems of
expanding shipping as chairman of the board of directors. According
to Natalya Mironova, the head of PMP’s press service, the general
manager himself initiated the lateral move, because he believed that
“there are already good managers in shipping”. PMP stubbornly denies
the theory that the staff changes were made just before a major
change of owners.

Changes may also affect Sovkomflot and Novoship during Vladimir
Putin’s second presidential term. Several months ago, rumors appeared
that Sergei Frank, now an aide to the prime minister, is hatching
plans to merge the companies and is ready to head the new structure.
Of course, there is still no confirmation of this information. The
mechanism of the merger is also unclear. Unlike wholly state-owned
Sovkomflot, Novoship is only 50% state-owned.

;node=25&doc_id=492455

–Boundary_(ID_iURF6VmLC+b7gYN+yHJdyQ)–
From: Baghdasarian

http://www.kommersant.com/tree.asp?rubric=3&amp

Armenians protest against Turkey’s entry

ANSA English Media Service
December 17, 2004

EU: ARMENIANS PROTEST AGAINST TURKEY’S ENTRY

BRUSSELS

(ANSA) – BRUSSELS, December 17 – Several hundreds of
Armenians protested on Friday in Brussels near the Justus
Lipsius Palace where the European Council was discussing
Turkey’s bid to enter the EU demanding that the EU urge Ankara
to recognise the genocide against Armenians as a condition for
UE entry.

The protest was organised by the European Armenian
Federation, a huge community of some one million people.

Armenians from various European countries came to Brussels to
protest “against this Turkey in Europe” as they had written on
many banners. The biggest group came from France where some
400,000 Armenians live. Other groups came from Spain, Greece,
the Netherlands, Sweden and from Italy, mainly from Milan and
Rome where the largest Italian Armenian communities live.

The protesters wanted the EU to set as a pre-condition for
the start of accession talks the recognition of the genocide
against Armenians committed by the Turks between 1915 and 1923
which claimed some 1.5 million lives.

The Armenians were not the only ones who protested against
Turkey’s possible entry in the EU.

Dozens Turkish immigrants in Europe organised a sit-in in
Brussels against the policy of the Turkish government, including
the EU accession. (ANSA).
From: Baghdasarian

TEHRAN: Iran press reports 12 Dec Majlis session

Iran press reports 12 Dec Majlis session

Iran press review from BBC Monitoring
13 Dec 04

Sharq, 13/12/2004, p 7

Majlis Protests Against the Iran Zamin Festival

Pre-Agenda Speech — Seyyed Mehdi Purfatemi, Representative of Dashti and
Tangestan: Providing an Atmosphere for the Activity of All Tendencies

With a review of the Islamic Revolution’s history, we will reach the
conclusion that an important part of the two decades after the revolution’s victory
was spent on issues and conditions related to the revolution that were imposed
on us.

At the outset of the revolution, some of the political groups resorted to
violence because of lacking the culture of political activity. This was also the
time when foreign invasion or the war was imposed on our country. After that,
a part of our time was spent on reconstruction of the devastations of war. But
the third decade of the revolution, which was expected to be the decade of
stabilizing the system and institutionalizing the political participation of
people and transition toward a civil society, fortunately concurred with the
seventh presidential election. That election was rightfully described as an epic
by the eminent leader. The wishes and demands of the majority of people
actualized in Mr Khatami’s programs, even though some people had a different
interpretation and explanation for it in their reactionary frame of mind. His rational
and accurate policies and positions corrected the violent image of the
Islamic Republic of Iran that had been presented for the world community, so that
the idea of dialogue among civilizations was approved and praised by the world
as one of his innovations.

But we should keep in mind that the 2 Khordad epic that surprised the world
community and rendered America passive was the result of the freest and
broadest electoral competition in which the people eagerly and willingly went to the
polling places to vote for their favorite individual among the candidates with
different tendencies and expressed their demand and exercised their will. At
that time, on the verge of the third decade of the Islamic Revolution’s
victory, the Iranian people returned to the Islamic Revolution’s original slogans,
goals and aspirations. Imam’s intended values for the revolution once again
emerged and appeared in Khordad 76 [May 1997] and the process of development in
all fields and institutionalization of civic participation came on the agenda.
In this way, although the Khatami government faced reactions, obstacles and
opposition from its critics and opponents and unavoidably had to pay heavy
prices to continue the course of reforms, it also made lots of achievements in
economic, political, cultural and social fields.

Now, after two terms full of ups and downs and while only a few months are
left until the next presidential election, the slogans of all officials,
organizations and political groups and parties are aimed at the people’s maximal
participation in the election as the manifestation of the system’s republicanism.
In this regard, there are a few important points to consider: First, we all
believe according to narratives from the Prophet that all people are responsible
to take part in their destiny. Second, according to the Constitution, which
is derived from luminous verses of the Koran and is the external manifestation
of the thoughts and ideas of the late imam (God’s benedictions be upon him),
in the Islamic Republic system of Iran, people are in control of their destiny
by virtue of divine will. In this system, rulers are elected by the people and
election is the most important means by which the authorities are held
accountable and put under the people’s control. Third, in the present circumstances,
maximum participation will further ensure our country’s national security. So
we have to plan for the people’s presence in the ninth presidential election
and prepare the requirements and preconditions for their participation. Most
importantly, we must try to convince the people that their vote and presence
will be effective. This important matter will not be achieved unless in the
present critical political circumstances we prepare an atmosphere for the elite
and political groups and parties, and generally the enormous current that has
roots in the revolution is attached to Iran and is looking forward to bright
horizons for the future, regardless of their diverse tastes and tendencies, to
freely perform activity and express their views on various issues. In this way,
the people in a competitive environment will be able to choose the candidates
representing their favorite views to entrust the administrative affairs to
them. This is the very political development that some do not consider as a top
priority. Otherwise, if one group or party or a certain faction were after
preparing such conditions as to eliminate others from the competition and paid no
attention to the demands of others, obviously, even if the most authoritative
political figure should be nominated as candidate in this atmosphere, the
people wouldn’t find their presence reasonable. Another point is the role of the
mass media, which could be very useful and effective in communicating
information, provided that the national media and various communication networks and
the intelligence and security facilities are not exclusively put at the disposal
of a certain current, especially against another current. Hence, in view of
the people’s enthusiastic and lively turnout in the last two presidential
elections, we should prepare suitable grounds for the people’s active and hopeful
participation in this election as well. In this case, the next president will
be elected by the people’s majority vote, not with a minimal popular vote.

Majlis Protests Against the Iran Zamin Festival

Political Desk: The Majlis speaker and a few members of the Developers
[Abadgaran] Coalition yesterday in the Majlis open session were protesting about the
way in which the theater festival of Khuzestan had been held. Meanwhile, a
representative close to the traditional spectrum of the conservatives began to
criticize the conduct of some of the fundamentalist faction’s members. As the
parliamentary correspondent of Sharq reports, Gholam Ali Haddad-Adel, the
Majlis speaker, ‘Emad Afrugh, representative of Tehran and the chairman of the
Cultural Committee, and Hassan Now’i-Aqdam, representative of Ardebil and member
of the Majlis presidium, were those who denounced the incidents of the Iran
Zamin Theater Festival in Ahvaz as being contrary to Islamic principles, against
Islamic veiling and chastity, and regrettable. These representatives in their
statements called for the removal of high-ranking governmental directors from
office. These protests, however, were voiced under such conditions that Mohsen
Yahyavi, representative of Borujerd and a member of the Islamic Association
of Engineers, protested at one of the members of the Majlis fundamentalist
faction whose bodyguard and driver had abducted a student girl at gunpoint with
the Xantia automobile and identification card of Majlis. Addressing Haddad-Adel
in a notice, Yahyavi said: “If a representative’s bodyguard did make a student
girl with Islamic veiling get in his car by showing an identification card
and at gunpoint, he must be considered as an adversary of religion. And if the
story is not true, newspapers must be stopped from publishing such news items.”
Valiollah Shoja’purian, representative of Behbahan and member of the minority
faction, also severely condemned the action by the Justice Department of
Khuzestan in arresting the general director of the guidance department of
Khuzestan Province. A few fundamentalist representatives also submitted written
notices in protest against the Iran Zamin Festival. In this festival, which was held
in the city of Ahvaz, artistic groups from a number of countries including
France, Armenia and some Islamic countries were present and staged their
theatrical performances.

We Cried Tears of Blood

But the first one to criticize the government and the minister of guidance
was ‘Emad Afrugh, who dealt with the issue of cultural transformation in his
pre-agenda speech. He said: “The meaning of cultural transformation is that we
axe the roots of our ideological concepts and the Islamic Revolution’s essence,
objectives and aspirations with our own hands and by using governmental
facilities, resources and opportunities.” He explained: “We heard of cultural
imperialism, ancient Spain and Andolos in our youth. But why have we forgotten that
period of history?” Comparing the present time with the old period, he said:
“I don’t think in Andolos they transformed the system from inside in the name
of theocracy. But what we are seeing today is that official organizations and
cultural officials by using governmental resources are axing the Islamic
Republic’s aspirations and objectives, including its cultural objectives.” Then he
spoke about the closing ceremony of the Iran Zamin Theater Festival and
considered it an instance of transformation from the inside. Afrugh said: “It might
be said that this event was in a private ceremony. If this was the case and
anyone wanted to criticize, I would stand against it in the name of private
boundary. But unfortunately, this program was held in a public place, in the name
of the Islamic Republic and in the presence of provincial and ministerial
officials.” Afrugh stated: “True Iranian artists should resist against this
obscenity and artistic transformation, because this festival was supposed to be a
theater festival, but instead it was a dance festival, especially the dance of
men and women together.” Noting that Islam and the Islamic Republic have
boundaries, the chairman of the Cultural Committee said: “The officials cannot say
they were faced with an action that was already done, because before the
performance the programs were played for the board of referees.” He added: “The say
it was only three minutes, but this is just a quantitative standpoint and the
qualitative views are important here.” At the end, Afrugh addressed the artists
and said: “If you want art to be perpetual, criticize yourself
introspectively so that the public prosecutor wouldn’t have to.”

Hassan Now’i-Aqdam was the next representative from the fundamentalist
faction who described the Iran Zamin Theater Festival as a scandal that broke the
heart of the owners of the revolution and the inheritors of the martyrs’ blood.
He too confirmed Afrugh’s statements in his pre-agenda speech and requested
the president to issue a decisive order for investigations into the matter, so
as to thwart the enemies from further playing with the inheritors of the
martyrs’ blood, the revolution’s selfless devotees and the revolution’s goals by
means of cultural transformation at our own hands.

Representatives of the fundamentalist faction also issued a few separate
written notices to the minister of Islamic culture and guidance regarding the Iran
Zamin Theater Festival that Gholam Ali Haddad-Adel, the Majlis speaker, read
out from the Majlis tribune. In these notices, Sattar Hedayatkhah,
representative of Buirahmad and Dena, Seyyed Mohammadreza Mirtajeddini, representative of
Tabriz, Azarshahr and Osku, and Seyyed Ahmad Hosseini, representative of
Sirjan and Bardsir, warned the minister of Islamic culture and guidance about the
promotion of vulgarity, the breaking of boundaries and the violation of divine
tenets in the Iran Zamin Festival of Ahvaz. Also, Representatives Seyyed
Ahmad Musavi and Nasser Sudani of Ahvaz, Seyyed Nasser Musavi of Ramhormoz,
Mohammad Sa’id Ansari of Abadan, Seyyed Mohammad Taqi Mohassel-Hamedani of Bafq and
Mehriz, Shokrollah ‘Attarzadeh of Bushehr, Genaveh and Deylam addressed
notices to the interior minister regarding the participation of the provincial
governor of Khuzestan and his deputies in the Iran Zamin Festival of Ahvaz. These
representatives also gave notices to the minister of Islamic culture and
guidance regarding the protests of the people of Ahvaz against this festival.

We Will Defend the People’s Cultural Rights

The Majlis speaker, Gholam Ali Haddad-Adel, summed up the protesting
statements by the fundamentalist faction’s members and said: “I have asked the
chairman of the Cultural Committee to follow up on the issue, so that we could defend
the people’s cultural rights.” He said: “The pious people of Ahvaz and
Khuzestan and the religious authorities of this area have shown reaction against
what happened, and the people’s most natural expectation from the officials is
that they observe Islamic tenets in such programs.” He asserted: “When the
officials know they should be careful with cultural programs, and at the same time
they invite groups of women dancers from non-Islamic countries, the least
thing to be said is that they were imprudent and careless.” The Majlis speaker
stated: “Why should theatrical groups unfamiliar with Islamic tenets be invited
to perform programs in Iran? So the first step would be for the high-ranking
officials to declare their position and respect the people’s demand. Besides,
any of the officials who committed an infraction or mistake must be interrogated
and reprimanded.”

Ratifying the Urgency of a Draft Bill to Suspend the Jury Law

Political Desk: The Majlis representatives approved the urgency of a draft
bill to suspend the jury law for political and press crimes passed in the Sixth
Majlis and to reinstate the previous jury law.

As the parliamentary correspondent of Sharq reports, according to the single
article of this draft bill, the jury law passed on 12/24/82 [3/14/2004] in the
Sixth Majlis will be suspended because of its financial burden and the lack
of financial sources for this purpose, and the previous jury law passed on
2/11/1379 [4/22/2000] will be in effect. Yesterday, when this draft bill was
propounded in the open session, Mohammad Mirtajeddini, representative of Tabriz and
the spokesman for the fundamentalists faction, explained: “Ever since the
Sixth Majlis passed the new jury law and the previous one was abolished, the
press court has been closed.” He said: “The current law has financial burdens and
presently cannot be practiced. According to this law, there are 500 people in
Tehran, 250 people in the capitals of provinces and 150 people in small cities
who are qualified to serve as jurors in political and press courts.” He
added: “Twenty-one of these people will be chosen by lot for membership in the
jury, and 14 members will be chosen in the capitals of provinces.” Mirtajeddini
said: “Execution of this law takes time and money, and for this reason we want
the previous law to be restored.” But Akbar A’lami, representative of Tabriz
and a member of the minority faction, objected to Mirtajeddini’s explanations
and said: “There is suspicion that the Seventh Majlis is opposed to freedom of
expression and is seeking to restrict political activities. So if we pass this
draft bill, we will strengthen these doubts.” A’lami said: “According to
Article 168 of the Constitution, legal proceedings for political and press crimes
must be conducted by a competent court, and this court must be held openly and
with the presence of a jury. If we want to make alterations in this law, this
is not the way to do so.” He said: “When a law is passed, its financial burden
is also taken into consideration. So we should ask the respective officials
why the law isn’t being practiced.” After A’lami’s explanations, a vote was
taken and the majority of representatives voted for the urgency of this draft
bill.

Investigation About the Ministry of Health

The proposal for investigating the Ministry of Health and Treatment, which
had been approved earlier in the Health Committee, yesterday was propounded in
the Majlis open session and passed with 140 votes.

Mironev’s Speech in the Open Session

Sergey Mironev, the chairman of the Russian Federation Council, yesterday
came to the Majlis open session and said: “There are unique capacities for useful
reciprocal cooperation in various aspects between Russia and Iran. The old
relations between the two countries are not only values that the nations of both
countries respect, but also a geopolitical fact and an element of stability
and security in Asia. This is why Russia considers your country as an important
partner both in bilateral relations and on the international level.” Mironev
asserted: “We would like to deepen our close and trust-building talks with
Iran over a wide range of issues, especially in view of the complicated situation
in the region.”

Amendment to the Election Law

In yesterday’s open session, the Majlis representatives approved the urgency
of a draft bill to reform the Majlis election law for Babolsar. This draft
bill, when finalized, will determine the destiny of this constituency. Meqdad
Najafnezhad, the elected candidate for Babolsar and Fereydun Kenar, resigned
before the approval of his credentials in Majlis and this matter led to
differences between the Guardian Council and the Interior Ministry. With the final
ratification of this urgent draft bill, if elected candidates for the Islamic
Consultative Assembly resign before or after the Guardian Council confirms the
accuracy of elections and until the candidates’ credentials are approved by the
Islamic Consultative Assembly, and if they officially announce their resignation
to the governor office of their constituency, their resignation will be
accepted and the new representative of the constituency will be elected in the
first midterm election after the resignation.

Resalat, 13/12/2004, p 3

The Speech of the Representative of Neyshabur

Hojjat ol-Eslam Hossein Sobhaninia, representative of Neyshabur, was the
second pre-agenda speaker in yesterday’s Majlis open session. He said: “The big
blight of the country’s nuclear diplomacy was that our diplomats viewed the
three sides of the triangle of America, the agency and Europe as separate from
each other and with excessive optimism failed to notice the division of work
between them.” He added: “Whenever Iran considered a pivotal role for the
Europeans, they obtained concessions from our country in return for some promises. But
when the time came for closing Iran’s nuclear case, the Europeans answered
that they wanted to do so, but America was exerting pressure and the agency
wouldn’t permit it.” Reiterating that the attainment of nuclear technology was
Iran’s absolute right, Sobhani said: “Under the present circumstances, it seems
that our country’s nuclear officials, while strengthening the negotiating team
and correcting their flaws, need to consider more comprehensive strategies by
viewing the sides of the mentioned triangle.”

The Speech of the Representative of Ardebil

Hassan Now’i-Aqdam, representative of Ardebil, was the fourth pre-agenda
speaker in the Islamic Consultative Assembly’s open session yesterday. Noting that
the consistent salary payment system was one of the most important
legislations in the Seventh Majlis, he said: “The Seventh Majlis, in line with
accomplishing the strategy of social justice, from the outset of its establishment
demanded the government to submit this bill to the Majlis before the budget bill
of the year 84 [3/21/2005 to 3/20/2006]. But unfortunately, in spite of our
frequent inquiries, this bill hasn’t been sent to the Majlis thus far.” He went
on to express regrets over the Iran Zamin Festival and said: “This festival
broke the heart of the revolution’s owners.” He added: “We are sorry that the
advocates of the culture of laxness and negligence stage such programs to satisfy
the revolution’s enemies and eradicate the revolution’s aspirations.”

Ratifying the Private Sector’s Activity in the Domain of Post and Telegraph

In yesterday’s open session, the Islamic Consultative Assembly passed the
generalities of a bill to authorize issuing licenses for post and telegraph
activities to the private sector. This bill permits the government to transfer a
part of its post and telegraph activities to the private sector.

The Majlis representatives also ratified the agreement between the
governments of Iran, Austria, Cyprus and Algeria for cooperation in the fields of public
health and medical and industrial sciences.

Resalat, 13/12/2004, p 3

On the Sidelines of the Majlis

Article 90 Committee Investigates Ahvaz Incident

The Article 90 Committee criticized the minister of guidance for negligence
in confronting the elements involved in the scandalous incident at the Ahvaz
theater.

In yesterday’s session of the Article 90 Committee, the film of the closing
ceremony of the Iran Zamin Theater Festival, which had been held last week in
Ahvaz, was displayed for the members of this committee. Shameless scenes
contrary to ethical principles, mixed dances of men and women, and promotion of
indecent and unethical relations evoked the representatives’ regret and protest.
After reviewing the scandalous film of the Ahvaz theater festival, the members
of the Article 90 Committee criticized the hesitation and indifference of the
minister of guidance and the imprudence pervading this ministry. The
representatives considered the mismanagement of the minister of guidance as the cause
of such inappropriate behaviors and corruption of the domain of art with
vulgarity.

Members of the Article 90 Committee demanded the minister of guidance to
follow up on the reasons behind this incident, to confront the organizers of the
scandalous Ahvaz theater festival and discharge the culpable directors.

Save the State News Agency!

The representative of Tabriz addressed a notice to the minister of guidance
regarding the publication of certain items in the Islamic Republic News
Agency’s bulletins.

Ms ‘Eshrat Sha’eq, representative of Tabriz, yesterday in a notice that was
read out by the Majlis speaker criticized the Islamic Republic News Agency for
publishing in its bulletins certain news items aimed at promotion of
secularism by means of the news sources of the Hypocrites [Mojahedin-e Khalq] and
called for adoption of due measures. The representative of Tabriz also gave the
president a notice about some of the educational activities by the presidential
institution’s Center for Participation of Women.

Representatives of Khuzestan Protest Against Ahvaz Festival

A group of representatives of Khuzestan protested against the scandalous
ceremony of the Iran Zamin Theater Festival in Ahvaz.

In this regard, Nasser Sudani, representative of Ahvaz, told our
correspondent: “The Iran Zamin Theater Festival and specifically its closing ceremony are
not defensible at all. The conduct at this ceremony was at odds with ethical
and human values.” He said: “The regrettable point is that the provincial
governor of Khuzestan and the general director of the guidance department of the
province were also present at the mentioned ceremony, but not only did they not
protest about the ceremony, they even gave prizes to the organizers.” Sudani
said the dismissal of different elements responsible for this incident and the
apology of the Guidance Ministry officials to the people of Khuzestan were the
least corrective measure expected. He asserted: “Before the Iran Zamin
Theater Festival in Ahvaz, I had acquired evidence that showed some inappropriate
things might happen at this festival. So I reflected this matter to the minister
of guidance and he promised to look into the issue. But no measure was taken
in practice and that led to this ugly ceremony.”

Representatives Be Observant

The Majlis speaker emphasized the need for representatives to be observant of
the actions and behaviors of their friends and acquaintances.

Yesterday, following the notice by Engineer Yahyavi, representative of
Borujerd, who called for investigations about the kidnapping of a student girl by
the bodyguard of one of the representatives of Khorramabad, Dr Haddad-Adel
stated: “One of the duties of representatives is to watch the deeds of their
friends and acquaintances and be careful that no one would take advantage of their
position in the guise of being close to them.” Pointing out the news items
published in some newspapers about the hideous behavior of the bodyguard of one of
the representatives, Engineer Yahyavi said: “If this matter is true as these
newspapers have written, we must demand the Judiciary to severely confront the
perpetrators. And if the item is not true, we must confront the newspapers
that published this piece of news.” It is worth mentioning that although this
representative is not a member of the fundamentalist faction, some of the
multipurpose correspondents whose mission is to undermine the Majlis yesterday were
trying use the improper action by this representative’s bodyguard as a pretext
to discredit the fundamentalist figures of Majlis.

Discussions About the Presidential Election in the Majority Faction

The general assembly of the fundamentalist representatives faction is holding
a session this week on Tuesday. In this session, which is going to be held
Tuesday after the evening prayers at the parliament building, the
representatives will be informed about the latest views on the presidential election and the
process of negotiations regarding the candidates and their programs. Also,
the members of three workgroups of the fundamentalist faction for consideration
of bills and proposals and offering expert views to the representatives will
be elected in this session.

An Independent Committee for Women and Youths

The proposal for establishing the Committee on Women, Family and Youths will
be considered in Majlis on Tuesday.

Announcing this matter, ‘Eshrat Sha’eq, representative of Tabriz and a member
of the women’s faction, said: “The issue of women, youths and family, in view
of the problems these classes are dealing with, is of immense importance and
requires that we have an independent committee in the Majlis to address these
matters. In the Fifth Majlis, there used to be such a committee. But
unfortunately the Sixth Majlis dissolved that committee instead of strengthening it.
Therefore, considering the need that is felt for attending the problems and
difficulties of youths and women, a group of representatives have signed a
proposal to reform the Majlis regulations and establish a special committee under the
title of Women, Family and Youths, and this proposal will soon be considered
in the Majlis.”
From: Baghdasarian

On this day – Dec. 17

The Daily Telegraph (Sydney, Australia)
December 17, 2004 Friday

ON THIS DAY

1980 Turkish Consul-General Sarik Ariyak and his bodyguard are shot
dead by two attackers at his Vaucluse residence in Sydney. Armenian
terrorists are blamed but no one has ever been charged with the
crime.

1830 South American revolutionary leader Simon Bolivar dies.

1845 Explorer Ludwig Leichhardt arrives at Port Essington in the
Northern Territory after a 14-month, 4800km overland journey from
Moreton Bay, Queensland.

1903

Orville Wright makes the first significant flight in a plane with an
engine, covering 36m in North Carolina.

1967 Prime Minister Harold Holt, 59, disappears, presumed drowned,
while swimming at Cheviot Beach, Portsea, in Victoria.

1980 Turkish Consul-General Sarik Ariyak and his bodyguard are shot
dead by two attackers at his Vaucluse residence in Sydney. Armenian
terrorists are blamed but no one has ever been charged with the
crime.

1982 Random breath testing is introduced in NSW to deter
drink-driving. It is credited with saving hundreds of lives.

1993

Federal Treasurer John Dawkins rocks the Keating Labor Government and
financial markets with a snap decision to retire.

1996 The leftist Tupac Amaru movement seizes the Japanese
ambassador’s residence in Lima, taking hundreds of diplomats and
government officials hostage. Four months later troops storm the
building, killing all 14 guerillas.
From: Baghdasarian

BAKU: Section 907 to be repealed after Garabagh conflict is settled

Section 907 to be repealed after Garabagh conflict is settled

Assa-Irada, Azerbaijan
Dec 16 2004

The US Department of State will fully repeal the Section 907 it
passed on Azerbaijan after the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Upper
Garabagh is settled, the US Ambassador to Azerbaijan Reno Harnish
told journalists on Wednesday.

Harnish said that the execution of Section 907 has been regularly
suspended by the US President every year since January 2002, which is
certainly based on Azerbaijan’s efforts at fighting global terrorism.

“The US is very pleased that meetings between the Azerbaijani and
Armenian foreign ministers on settling the Upper Garabagh conflict
continue and that further steps will be taken in this area in January.”
Harnish voiced a hope that such meetings will lead to a fair, long-term
resolution of the conflict through negotiations.*
From: Baghdasarian