Border of repelling an aggression

Agency WPS
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
September 13, 2006 Wednesday

BORDER OF REPELLING AN AGGRESSION

by: Igor Plugatarev

CIS COLLECTIVE SECURITY TREATY ORGANIZATION INDICATES ITS MILITARY
PROWESS IN THE EXERCISE IN BELARUS, KAZAKHSTAN, AND ARMENIA; An
update on military activeness of the CIS Collective Security Treaty
Organization.

The ink on the protocol President of Uzbekistan, Islam Karimov,
signed and returned his country into the CIS Collective Security
Treaty Organization was barely dry (it happened on August 21), the
Uzbek leader already suggests a joint Uzbek-Kazakh military exercise.
Karimov proposed the exercise while on a visit to the capital of
Kazakhstan on September 4.

The suggestion was made right in the wake of Border’2006, an
international exercise on a fairly large scope (by Central Asian
standards) official Astana staged in the Caspian Sea under the aegis
of the CIS Collective Security Treaty Organization. The Uzbek
military also invited to the exercise was present in the capacity of
observers. The impression is that it was truly sorry the Uzbek
national army was not involved. Had Tashkent truly participated, it
would have signified its bona fide membership in the CIS Collective
Security Treaty Organization as an international structure whose
weight, political and economic, is growing by the year.

The Caspian Warsaw Treaty

Exercise Border’2006 took place at the specially built training
facility 30 kilometers east from Aktau (a major port, former
Shevchenko) between August 23 and 26. This was the first such
exercise in Central Asia. Exercises of the Border series in
Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan in the past had been but "rehearsals".
Almost 2,500 servicemen, more than 60 armored vehicles, nearly 50
artillery pieces and mortars, almost 40 aircraft and helicopters, and
14 ships and tenders (including surface combatants of the Russian
Caspian Flotilla) were involved in Border’2006. The assets drilled
operations of the Collective Rapid Response Forces in the Kazakh
direction. It was the first joint maneuver within the framework of
the future Southern Group of Armies of the Seven States (Armenia,
Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan).

The exercise near Aktau was tactical and ran for purposes of
research, according to Russian Ground Forces Second-in-Command
Colonel General Vladimir Bulgakov. As a matter of fact, Bulgakov even
ran a parallel with the exercises the Warsaw Pact had once run. "The
scale is different of course, but the quantity of troops does not
really matter. What matters is teaching commanders to view whatever
tasks they are facing from the standpoint of the Collective Rapid
Response Forces and to act accordingly," Bulgakov said. "It is
particularly important now because the experience gained in the
Warsaw Pact exercises is lot for us now. Senior officers involved in
Border’2006 share common training (in the Soviet Army – Nezavisimoe
Voennoe Obozrenie), but low-ranking officers and noncoms do not."

The exercise on the Caspian coast was an attempt to remedy that.
Exercise Commander General of the Army Muhtar Altynbayev (Defense
Minister of Kazakhstan) praised "the prowess of units of the
Collective Rapid Response Forces demonstrated in the course of the
exercise of the collective defense forces."

Still, Altynbayev also pointed out that "We know now that the CIS
Collective Security Treaty will work if necessary, that its
signatories will make their regular armies available if need be, in
accordance with their commitments."

This was an extraordinary statement indeed. "Military aid" to one
another has been so far a purely hypothetical issue, just a clause of
Article 4 of the CIS Collective Security Treaty Organization
(aggression against any member of the CIS Collective Security Treaty
Organization or signatory of the CIS Collective Security Treaty is
taken as an aggression against all). The clause, however, does not
specify exactly what is to be done about it. This ambivalence
generated doubts that whenever one country of the Organization is
attacked, all others will rush to its side and prevent it from being
left to face the danger all alone. Say, there is a distinct
possibility of a conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, two
countries aspiring to claim Nagorno-Karabakh for their own. Neither
would hesitate to rattle sabers and each does so every now and then.
Nikolai Bordyuzha became general secretary of the CIS Collective
Security Treaty Organization in 2002. He has never spared time or
effort to make Article 4 of the Charter more than just an empty
declaration. CIS councils of the heads of states and defense
ministers passed the necessary decisions.

Exercises

The Russian-Belarusian exercise Allied Security’2006 as the largest
in the post-Soviet zone became the first practical measure. Involving
almost 9,000 servicemen and even strategic aviation, it took place at
the testing site right near the westernmost border of the future
Union in June. In other words, it took place near Poland, a NATO
country. Allied Security’2006 became the first exercise to involve
units of the West Group of Armies of the CIS Collective Security
Treaty Organization, the largest of all (200,000 men). Border’2006
became the second exercise of the series, another indication of the
readiness of members of the CIS Collective Security Treaty
Organization to strike back together.

It is reasonable now to expect the third analogous exercise to be
organized for the Group of Armies in the Caucasus, the one comprised
of units of Russian and Armenian armies (the Russian 102nd Military
Base near Yerevan 5,000 men strong). No official reports have been
made on it so far which is hardly surprising. It will mean an
immediate political scandal. Official Baku will immediately claim
that Moscow, a political negotiator between Azerbaijan and Armenia,
connives with "occupation of Azerbaijani lands by Armenia."

It is known, however, that Atom-Antiterror’2006 exercise of the CIS
Counter-Terrorism Center will take place in Armenia in late
September. According to what information is available, one of the
clauses of the document reads, "Drill interaction between the
tactical group of the United Headquarters of the CIS Collective
Security Treaty with command structures of the Armed Forces of the
Republic of Armenia in accomplishment of combat missions with the
purpose of containment and elimination of terrorist gangs against the
background of destabilization in the Caucasus." Meaning that this is
not a petty conflict" (territorially petty, of course) over a nuclear
power plant seized by terrorists. The CIS Collective Security Treaty
Organization makes it plain to potential aggressors that they’d
better keep their distance if they know what is good for them.

In other words, in less than a year the CIS Collective Security
Treaty Organization will formulate its military prowess in all
regional alliances of the countries comprising it. This move is
fairly important. A series of these major exercises is like a
ceremony of presentation of the Organization for the countries that
may be contemplating membership in it. Why not indeed? Bordyuzha once
told Nezavisimoe Voennoe Obozrenie that "since our problems are
nearly identical, it will be nice to have Ukraine cooperating with
the CIS Collective Security Treaty Organization." Since Kyiv is
finally revising its views on the necessity of membership in NATO and
the Alliance has already been given a kick in the rear in the Crimea,
the Organization is quite correct to be as active as it is. Bordyuzha
also mentioned Georgia (as one of the founders of the CIS Collective
Security Treaty Organization) and Azerbaijan…

"Make War" Sans Ministers…

Border’2006 organizers were only disheartened by absence of deputy
defense ministers. Official reports were absent of course, but
insiders told Nezavisimoe Voennoe Obozrenie that Kyrgyz Defense
Minister Lieutenant General Ismail Isakov was Altynbayev’s only
foreign counterpart to turn up for the exercise. Even Tajikistan was
represented by Chief of the General Staff Lieutenant General Ramil
Nadyrov.

Belarus didn’t even bother to send observers. As spokesmen for Minsk
reasonably asked, "Where is the Caspian Sea and where are we?"
Moreover, Belarusian Defense Minister Colonel General Leonid
Maltsev’s position is known: learn only from whoever has something to
teach you; and Minsk has been running exercises involving 3-4 times
servicemen more than 2,500 men for years now. Moreover, Russian
Deputy Premier and Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov preferred
Border’2006 to a tour of Far East military-industrial complex and a
meeting with US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld after that.

No need to say here that defense ministers’ very presence ups the
status of military exercises.

What Units Participated In Border’2006

Russia: tactical team of the Collective Rapid Response Forces;
company of the 77th Marine Brigade of the Caspian Flotilla, wing of
aircraft; 5 surface combatants of the Caspian Flotilla; more than 500
servicemen (mostly conscripts) of the Volga-Urals Military District;
tactical group. Almost 1,000 officers and soldiers in all.

Kazakhstan: Marine battalion; group of ships of the Coast Guards; Air
Mobile Forces units; army aviation; auxiliary units; tactical group.
One thousand and four hundred servicemen in all.

Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan: one platoon of motorized infantry each;
tactical groups. One hundred officers and soldiers in all.

Uzbekistan: military observers.

CIS Collective Security Treaty Organization: command structures,
headquarters, units of the Collective Rapid Response Forces; United
Headquarters and Secretariat of the CIS Collective Security Treaty
Organization.

Source: Nezavisimoe Voennoe Obozrenie, No 32, September 8 – 14, 2006,
p. 2

Translated by A. Ignatkin
From: Baghdasarian

TEHRAN: Iranian Nation Winner In N-Case: Haddad-Adel

IRANIAN NATION WINNER IN N-CASE: HADDAD-ADEL

Islamic Republic News Agency, Iran
Sept 11 2006

The Iranian nation will emerge winner in the nuclear standoff,
visiting Iranian Majlis Speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel said in Yerevan
on Monday.

Haddad-Adel, who arrived in the Armenian capital, Yerevan, Monday on
the first leg of a two-nation visit, met with staff of Iran’s embassy
in Armenia and their families. Following his visit to Armenia, he
will next pay a visit to Kyrgyzstan.

"If the bullying powers impose sanctions against Iran, our nation
will not yield to them and give up its rights," he said.

He added that joy and hope have been created in Iran for the country’s
development in all fields, saying "Iran will achieve success in
economic areas day by day."

The speaker said Iran took steps for its development and growth,
stressing the nation has an optimistic view of the future.

He noted that Iran had become self-sufficient in the production of
wheat and said the country is currently self-sufficient by 90 percent
in the production of agricultural goods.

The speaker stressed the importance of making use of the two countries’
potentials to further promote bilateral relations.
From: Baghdasarian

OSCE ‘Deeply Concerned’ About Violence Against Armenian Journalists

OSCE ‘DEEPLY CONCERNED’ ABOUT VIOLENCE AGAINST ARMENIAN JOURNALISTS
By Emil Danielyan

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Sept 12 2006

The Yerevan office of the Organization for Security and Cooperation
in Europe added its voice on Tuesday to serious concerns expressed by
Armenian media and human rights groups about recent reported attacks
on local journalists.

"The OSCE Office in Yerevan is deeply concerned over recent incidents
of violence and intimidation against local journalists which have
obstructed their professional duties and infringed upon the freedom
of expression," it said in a statement.

"The Office considers it extremely important for these cases to be
properly investigated and calls for the perpetrators to be punished
in full accordance with the law. Law-enforcement bodies are urged to
undertake prompt measures to ensure the safety of media professionals
in order to promote freedom of expression in the country," added
the statement.

The statement seems to have been prompted by the reported September 6
beating of Hovannes Galajian, editor of the opposition-linked "Iravunk"
newspaper, by two unknown men. The Armenian police have launched a
criminal investigation into the incident but have not charged anyone
yet. Galajian and his staff have attributed the violence to their
hard-hitting coverage of the Armenian government and its loyalists.

The OSCE office, which monitors the state of press freedom in Armenia,
also cited the saga of Gagik Shamshian, a freelance journalist who
claims to have been harassed by a local government chief allegedly
angered by his news reporting. The police controversially launched
criminal proceedings against Shamshian last month after he accused
the official’s brother of attacking him with a large group of other
men in June.

Armenian media associations have also denounced as politically
motivated the prosecution of Arman Babajanian, the editor of the
independent "Zhamanak Yerevan" newspaper who was convicted of
illegally avoiding military service and sentenced to four years
in prison by a Yerevan court last Friday. While admitting to draft
dodging, Babajanian claimed that he was jailed because of his strong
opposition to Armenia’s leadership.

The prison sentence is quite harsh by Armenian standards. Young
Armenian men found guilty of draft evasion have usually been jailed
for between two and three years.

"Given the history of politicized prosecution of journalists in
Armenia, we are skeptical about the appropriateness of this sentence,"
the executive director of the New York-based Committee to Protect
Journalists (CPJ), Joel Simon, said in a Monday statement that cited
RFE/RL’s coverage of Babajanian’s arrest and trial.

"Physical assaults against journalists [in Armenia] also continue,
and CPJ research shows that officials do little to apprehend and
prosecute the perpetrators," the statement said.
From: Baghdasarian

U.N. Adopts Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy

U.N. ADOPTS GLOBAL COUNTER-TERRORISM STRATEGY

PanARMENIAN.Net
11.09.2006 13:33 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan welcomed the
adoption of the Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy by the General
Assembly. "I commend Member States for developing and agreeing to a
comprehensive strategic framework to counter terrorism. In doing so,
they have resolved to take concrete actions to address the conditions
conducive to the spread of terrorism, prevent and combat terrorism in
all its forms, and strengthen the individual and collective capacity
of States and the United Nations to do so — all while ensuring
the protection of human rights. I congratulate the President of the
General Assembly and his two co-chairs — Ambassador Vanu Gopala Menon
of Singapore and Ambassador Juan AntonioYañez-Barnuevo of Spain —
for leading the membership to this historic achievement.

The upcoming fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks of 11
September 2001, serves as one of many solemn reminders of the
gruesome and unjustifiable consequences of terrorism all over the
world. I urge all Member States to honor the victims of terrorism
everywhere, by taking swift action to implement all aspects of
the strategy. May today’s agreement demonstrate the international
community’s unwavering determination to defeat terrorism," he said,
reported U.N. communication unit.

–Boundary_(ID_Bfuy6sTCpaYYchPDXAAh7A)–
From: Baghdasarian

Armenian Peacekeepers Should Take Part In Peacekeeping Mission In Le

ARMENIAN PEACEKEEPERS SHOULD TAKE PART IN PEACEKEEPING MISSION IN LEBANON, FORMER RA DEFENCE MINISTER IS CONVINCED

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Sept 08 2006

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 8, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. Armenian
peacekeepers should take part in the peacekeeping mission in
Lebanon. Former RA Defence Minister Vagharshak Haroutiunian gave such
assurance at the September 8 seminar-discussion at the Armenian Center
for National and International Studies. In Haroutiunian’s words,
Armenian forces can implement two, fighting and rear functions in
Lebanon. In his opinion, Armenia should take part in the rear and
restore the infrastructures with the help of sappers. In the opinion
of arabologist, YSU lecturer, former RA Ambassador to Syria Davit
Hovhannisian, Armenia "has a great act" to do in Lebanon in several
respects. In particular, Lebanon has an important role in the region,
there is a large Armenian community there, the Catholicosate of the
Great Cilician House is there. Davit Hovhannisian gave assurance that
"the Armenian community will feel itself safer with the presence of
the Armenian soldier."
From: Baghdasarian

Issue Of Putting On Agenda Draft Decision On Setting Up NA Ad Hoc Co

ISSUE OF PUTTING ON AGENDA DRAFT DECISION ON SETTING UP NA AD HOC COMMISSION ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE REMAINS UNSETTLED

Noyan Tapan
Armenians Today
Sept 08 2006

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 8, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. The draft decision
on setting up a National Assembly ad hoc commission to examine issues
of the Armenian Genocide – the initiative of Tatul Manaserian, who
recently left the NA Justice faction to become an independent deputy,
has been in circulation in the RA National Assembly since May 3. It
is proposed setting up such a commission "in order to clarify the
chronology of the Armenian Genocide, prevent diverse comments, condemn
the genocide and adopt a common position on recognition of the Armenian
Genocide." Among the commission’s tasks will be expressing opinions
about various cases of genocide organized and committed by Turkey or
committed with the assistance of Turkey in order to underline their
lasting character and the clear tendency to exterminate the Armenians,
as well as to formulate demands for condemnation and recognition
of the Armenian Genocide, including material, financial and moral
compensation. It was envisaged to discuss the draft at the September
8 sitting of the NA Standing Committee on State and Legal Issues
with the aim of making a conclusion about putting the draft on the
agenda of the autumn session that starts from September 11. However,
as NT correspondent was informed from the committee chairman Rafik
Petrosian, the discussion of the issue did not take place due to
Tatul Manaserian’s absence from the sitting.
From: Baghdasarian

ANKARA: Second Italian Climber Dies On Mount Ararat

SECOND ITALIAN CLIMBER DIES ON MOUNT ARARAT

Anatolian Times, Turkey
Sept 8 2006

ANKARA – Rescue workers on Friday found the body of a second Italian
mountainer at the summit of Mount Ararat, eastern Turkey, his travel
agent said.

The second climber to die was named as Franco Pacifico, 65, a member of
an 11-member Italian team that reached the 5,136-metre (16,850-foot)
summit on Tuesday but got caught in a heavy blizzard, Mustafa Kaya
told AFP.

Officials said on Thursday that another member of the group, Caterina
Fruttero, had also lost her life.

Both are believed to have died of hypothermia.

Kaya said the remaining nine mountaineers had descended safely.

Mount Ararat (Agri in Turkish) is located in easternmost Turkey, where
the borders of Iran, Armenia and the Azeri enclave of Nakhchivan meet.

Most of it is a closed military zone and mountaineers need special
permission from the Turkish authorities for expeditions on the
mountain.
From: Baghdasarian

ANKARA: Turkey Strongly Rejects EP Report

TURKEY STRONGLY REJECTS EP REPORT
By Cihan News Agency

Zaman Online, Turkey
Aug 5 2006

The Turkish Foreign Ministry on Tuesday said it strongly rejected
the European parliament report compiled by Dutch legislator Camiel
Eurlings, saying it was incompatible with the prestige and gravity
of the European parliament.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Namik Tan said that the controversial
report would not contribute to the improvement of ties between Turkey
and European Union. "The report lacks commonsense and objectivity."

The European parliament report, which was compiled by Dutch legislator
Camiel Eurlings and was adopted by the European parliament’s foreign
affairs committee on Monday, harshly criticized Turkey for its slow
pace of reform on rights, freedom of expression and relations with
Greek Cyprus.

"Turkey was deeply saddened with the stance of the European parliament
regarding the so-called Armenian genocide claims," Tan said.

Spokesman Tan said that the European lawmakers should act with
consideration and amend the draft report.

The report complains that the pace of the reforms slowed in 2005 and
the implementation of reforms still remains uneven, underlining that
significant further efforts are required in regard to fundamental
freedoms and human rights, in particular freedom of expression,
women’s rights, religious freedoms, trade union rights and cultural
rights, and the further strengthening of the fight against torture
and ill-treatment.
From: Baghdasarian

TBILISI: Military Buildup Worries Europe, And Rightly So

MILITARY BUILDUP WORRIES EUROPE, AND RIGHTLY SO

The Messenger, Georgia
Aug 5 2006

Georgia still has the flag of Europe flying from every public building,
but in reality the country’s relations with the EU have reached
something of a stumbling block. On August 28 EU External Relations
Commissioner, Benita Ferrero-Waldner, who is in charge of the European
Neighbourhood Policy (ENP), castigated Caucasian countries over huge
increases in military spending.

Speaking at a Ljubljana conference on the implementation of the ENP
action plans with South Caucasus, Ferrero-Waldner had nothing but
extremely stern words for Georgian. Pointing first to the lack of
progress in conflict resolution, which she said was a responsibility
of "all parties", she went on to argue that the vast increase in the
military budgets of Georgia and Azerbaijan-which she described as going
"through the roof"-was not only unjustifiable given the deplorable
social conditions in those countries, but also hindered the peaceful
resolution of the conflicts.

Though in a subsequent interview with Radio Free Europe she admitted
that this criticism would not prevent the adoption of the ENP action
plans, she added the increase of "hate speech" she detected in all
three South Caucasus countries to her list of charges.

Ferrero-Waldner makes a good case: not only is it clear that in
a country as poor as Georgia, where most of the population live in
extreme poverty, unemployment is rife, access to healthcare is scarce
and teachers and doctors live on a pittance, spending the lions share
of the state budget new guns is unacceptable; an increase in military
spending coupled with an increase in military rhetoric makes peaceful
conflict resolution ever more difficult.

Georgia has repeatedly stated its commitment to solving its separatist
conflicts only by peaceful means, and has submitted peace plans to
that effect to both South Ossetia and Abkhazia. These plans have
one international approval, and call first of all for confidence
building measures to be implemented between the conflicting sides. It
is difficult to see how these plans can proceed past stage one then,
when both sides are rattling their sabres ever louder "lowering the
threshold for war", and Georgia saw the biggest increase in military
spending of any country in the world this year. "Harsh rhetoric does
not create an atmosphere conducive to restoring mutual trust and
resolving these conflicts" she warns.

In Georgia’s defence, this military build up does start from an
incredibly low base, it was only 1998 when the whole of Senaki
military base (now rebuilt to those ‘European Standards’ we hear so
much about) mutinied over conditions and pay, and Georgia clearly
needs a strong military to stop it sliding back towards being a
failed state. Also, military build up is by and large supported
by the Georgian population, though increased employment and better
social conditions would be supported still more. However, it is also
true is that Georgia needs the EU, membership may be a dim prospect,
but if the peacekeeping forces and settlement mechanisms are to be
internationalised in the conflict zones, the EU will prove far more
acceptable to Russia than NATO; it is with this in mind that Georgia
should take Ferrero-Waldner’s words to heart.

Azerbaijan, fat on oil and gas revenues, without Russian military
might to worry about in its confrontation with Nagorno-Karabakh and
with an authoritarian regime which tightly controls the media, can
ignore the EU’s advice, but any escalation in that conflict would
only add to the suffering of its already impoverished population.

The EU is right to be worried, the last thing Europe needs is
instability on its crucial south-eastern flank, another Balkans would
be a disaster in terms of human trafficking, drugs and terrorism.

Anything they can say to try and push back the Caucasus from the
verge of armed hostilities is to be welcomes, and we can only hope
that regional leaders take Ferrero-Waldner’s advice: "Leaders have
a responsibility to prepare their populations for peace, not war."
From: Baghdasarian

Armenian Journalists Union Announces Contest For Journalists

ARMENIAN JOURNALISTS UNION ANNOUNCES CONTEST FOR JOURNALISTS

Arka News Agency, Armenia
Sept 4 2006

YEREVAN, September 4. /ARKA/. Armenian Journalists Union has announced
a contest for the best journalist work. The union sys the contest
is announced as part of the celebration of Armenia’s independence
15th anniversary.

Works have to cover Armenian people struggle for independence.

Media outlets’ and organizations’ journalists as well as freelancers
are eligible to contend. The deadline for submitting works is
September 15.

The ceremony of handing awards is to be held on September 20 September
21 is Armenia’s Independence Day.
From: Baghdasarian