Armenian PM Says Armenia Open To Talks With Turkey

ARMENIAN PM SAYS ARMENIA OPEN TO TALKS WITH TURKEY

ARMENPRESS
Aug 2, 2007

YEREVAN, AUGUST 2, ARMENPRESS: In an interview with Al Jazeera Network,
Qatar, Armenia’s prime minister Serzh Sarkisian said he is ready to
negotiate with Turkey’s new government.

Serzh Sarkisian told Al Jazeera on Tuesday: "We can’t stay in a
situation without having communication and talks with our neighbor
because the easiest way of resolving this issue is dialogue and
negotiations."

Armenian prime minister reiterated Yerevan’s willingness to negotiate
unconditioned normalization of relationships. He said it was high
time to establish diplomatic relations adding also that both nations
should have done it several years ago.

According to Sarkisian, absence of normal ties damages both Turkey
and Armenia.

"It is Turkey that makes normalization of ties contingent on
conditions, which is absolutely unacceptable to us. I am sure that
prime minister Erdogan has now a better chance to solve this issue,’
he said, explaining that Armenians never said Turkey must recognize the
1915 genocide as a condition for starting normalization of relations.

"We said and are saying that the genocide did occur, but we also say
it is not a reason for Turkey and Armenia to have no relationships,
contacts and ties because the easiest way of resolving our problems
is dialogue and negotiations," Serzh Sarkisian said.
From: Baghdasarian

Antibias effort stirs anger in Watertown

The Boston Globe

August 1, 2007

ts/articles/2007/08/01/antibias_effort_stirs_anger _in_watertown/

Antibias effort stirs anger in Watertown

Debate focuses on genocide

By Keith O’Brien, Globe Staff | August 1, 2007

WATERTOWN — As far as town proclamations go, the one that declared
Watertown a No Place for Hate community in July 2005 seemed like a pretty
innocuous one. The goal was to celebrate diversity and challenge bigotry.
And the program, in place in 67 Massachusetts communities and hundreds of
others nationwide, has generated very little controversy elsewhere.
But that has not been the case in Watertown. In recent weeks, the town that
bills itself as No Place for Hate on a sign outside Town Hall is abuzz with
anger and frustration, especially among the large Armenian population. At
issue is not the program itself, but the group behind it, the
Anti-Defamation League, and in particular the ADL’s refusal to acknowledge
the Armenian genocide at the hands of Turks during World War I.
"It’s kind of the worst hatred to deny genocide," said Nayiri Arzoumanian, a
woman of Armenian heritage who has lived in Watertown for eight years. "It’s
the worst kind of hypocrisy."
The debate began in letters to the editor of the Watertown Tab newspaper and
has pitted Watertown Armenians against the ADL’s national director, Abraham
H. Foxman. Now what was once considered a positive civic effort, declaring
Watertown No Place For Hate, finds itself at the center of a debate burdened
by divisive international history and politics.
For decades, Armenians have fought to get the Turkish government and other
world leaders to recognize the deaths of as many as 1.5 million Armenians
during World War I as genocide. The refusal of the ADL to support the
Armenians, especially as they lobby Congress to recognize the genocide, has
fueled the local war of words.
Sharistan Melkonian — chairwoman of the Armenian National Committee of
Eastern Massachusetts, based in Watertown — accused Foxman of engaging in
"genocide denial" in an interview with the Globe. She said she will call for
the Watertown No Place for Hate program to sever its ties with the ADL
unless it denounces Foxman’s position and acknowledges the genocide.
In a separate interview, Foxman countered that it would be "bigoted" to
dismantle a program focused on fighting hatred simply because the ADL does
not share the Armenians’ point of view. And Foxman maintained his position
that the ADL, which has spoken out against ethnic cleansing in the Balkans
and genocide in Darfur, does not have a role in the long-standing dispute
between the Armenians and the Turks.
"We’re not party to this, and I don’t understand why we need to be made
party," Foxman said.
It is a tense and tangled debate that has taken Watertown officials and the
ADL by surprise. The ADL says it never faced this issue until it bubbled to
the surface in Watertown, home to more than 8,000 Armenian-Americans. How
the town will respond is not yet clear, said Mark Sideris, Town Council vice
president.
But some residents of Armenian heritage are clearly troubled.
"I’m not against, particularly, No Place For Hate," said Dikran Kaligian, an
Armenian-American who has been a Watertown resident for 17 years. "I think
it’s got its heart in the right place. But let’s get some answers."
The ADL has certified No Place For Hate programs in hundreds of towns and
cities across the United States. After a year, during which the town or city
organizes anti-bias programs, the municipality receives a placard from the
ADL to be posted for public display.
When town councilors declared Watertown a No Place for Hate community in
July 2005, it generated just a few lines in the town minutes and passed
unanimously by a voice vote. "It seemed like a reasonable thing for the town
to do," Sideris said. And he never expected that it would become
controversial. But in recent weeks that is what has happened.
According to Armenians and many historians, the Turks systematically killed
as many as 1.5 million Armenians living under the Ottoman Empire between
1915 and 1923. A Polish-Jewish lawyer later coined the term genocide, citing
the Armenian experience. But the Turkish government has never acknowledged
their history as such, leading to decades of anger and frustration among
Armenians.
Foxman said he is surprised that he has become a target of Armenians. The
ADL, a group founded in 1913 to fight anti-Semitism, has no official
position on the Armenian genocide, he said.
"I’m not going to be the arbiter of someone else’s history," he said in the
interview, adding that he does not believe that Congress should either. When
asked specifically if what happened to Armenians under the Ottoman Empire
was genocide, he replied, "I don’t know." The ADL only takes positions, he
said, on current events, not on something that happened in the past.
But Armenian leaders say that is a disingenuous answer coming from an
organization that often pressures people to stand up for human rights around
the globe. They believe that Israel’s ties to Turkey, a rare Muslim partner
in the Middle East, have influenced the ADL’s point of view. By refusing to
become an "arbiter of history," Melkonian said, the ADL is suggesting that
there is some question whether genocide happened, and that is what
infuriates Armenians.
"You would never ever say that about the genocide in Darfur; you would never
ever say that about the Holocaust," said Melkonian. "You need to stop
genocide anywhere you can, and the only way to stop genocide in the future
is to acknowledge that it happened."
The entire debate has become "politics at a different level," said Town
Councilor Stephen Corbett, far beyond anything concerning Watertown’s No
Place for Hate program, a well-received effort that since 2005 has
cosponsored public forums on immigration issues and produced a video and
traveling exhibition about the many faces of Watertown.
"Ultimately, we’d like to get back to the business of doing the basic kind
of local programs that we can do, free and clear of the shadow of this
controversy," said Will Twombly, the cochairman of Watertown’s No Place For
Hate committee.
But Twombly, whose program receives corporate money through ADL’s grant
program, said it will not be possible to move forward until the committee
meets with ADL’s regional director Andrew H. Tarsy and asks some tough
questions about its stance on the Armenian genocide. At that point, Twombly
said, the committee will decide on the best course of action, including the
option of severing ties with the ADL altogether, effectively ending the
program. He said the committee acknowledges the Armenian genocide, even if
the ADL does not.
"Clearly, No Place For Hate is a program based on tolerance, based on
respect for differences, and based on mutual respect and care for
individuals, and in no way does the Armenian genocide represent any of those
values," Twombly said. "Not to condemn the genocide and fully recognize it
for what it was, I personally find inconsistent with the mission of No Place
for Hate."
From: Baghdasarian

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachuset

MFA: Minister Oskanian Visits Samtskhe-Javakheti Region of Georgia

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia
—————————————— ——-
Press and Information Department
0010, Government House 2, Republic Square, Yerevan
Tel: 374 10. 54 40 41-202, Fax: 374 10. 54 56 56 01, E-mail: [email protected]

PRESS RELEASE
305-30-07-2007

Minister Oskanian Visits Samtskhe-Javakheti Region of Georgia, Meets with
Members of Georgia’s Diplomatic Corps

As he concluded his working visit to Georgia, Foreign Minister returned to
Armenia from Batumi. His return trip included stops in Akhaltskha and
Akhalkalak.

In Akhaltskha, he met with officials of the Samtskhe-Javakheti region, as
well as representatives of the Armenian community and the youth.

The Minister’s next stop was Akhalkalak. There, Minister Oskanian visited
the Holy Cross Church, met with Armenian community representatives and
Georgian Parliamentarians of Armenian origin who represent the region.

During the meetings, the Armenian Foreign Minister spoke in detail about
Armenia’s foreign policy priorities, Armenian-Georgian relations and
forthcoming bilateral projects. He also responded to questions.

That same afternoon, on his way to Yerevan, the Minister stopped in Lori to
meet with more than a dozen members of Georgia’s diplomatic corps who were
visiting Armenia’s Lori region, at the invitation of Armenia’s Ambassador to
Georgia, Hrach Silvanian. The ambassadors, accompanied by Lori’s regional
governor Aram Kocharian, the primates of the Gugarats and Georgian Dioceses
of the Armenian Apostolic Church, as well as representatives of the
Armenian Foreign Ministry and the Mother See of Etchmiadzin, visited the
monasteries of Haghpat and Sanahin, the home-museum of Anastas and Artem
Mikoyans in Sanahin and the copper-molybdenum factory of Alaverdi. The visit
served to better familiarize the diplomats about the life, traditions,
culture and economy of Armenia’s regions bordering Georgia.
From: Baghdasarian

U.S. Doesn’t Want Armenia To Choose Between EU And Russia

U.S. DOESN’T WANT ARMENIA TO CHOOSE BETWEEN EU AND RUSSIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
30.07.2007 18:39 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ During the meeting with Armenian President Robert
Kocharian we discussed the South Caucasus’s ties with the Cyprus,
Turkey and Greece as well as Armenia’s energy security, U.S. Deputy
Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs,
OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair Mattew Bryza told reporters in Yerevan.

Diversification of energy sources is one of the most important
points in Armenia’s energy issue. "The U.S. highlights security of
the Metsamor NPP before its closing. We also think that construction
of a new and secure NPP is necessary for Armenia," Mr Bryza said.

He also noted that Armenia and EU have elaborated joint projects in
the energy sector adding that the U.S. would like Armenia to choose
between Russia and the EU. "They should work together," he said.

At that the diplomat underscored that the closing of Verkhny Lars
checkpoint at the Russian-Georgian border poses extra difficulties
for Armenia. "We are trying to boost the commodity turnover between
Armenia and Georgia as well as other states and are hopeful for
normalization of relations between Armenia and Turkey," Mr Bryza said.
From: Baghdasarian

RA President Receives Matthew Bryza And Rudolf Perina

RA PRESIDENT RECEIVES MATTHEW BRYZA AND RUDOLF PERINA

Noyan Tapan
Jul 30, 2007

YEREVAN, JULY 30, NOYAN TAPAN. Robert Kocharian, the RA President,
received Matthew Bryza, the Co-Chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group, and
Ambassador Rudolf Perina, the U.S. Charge d’Affaires in the Republic
of Armenia, on July 30.

According to the information provided to Noyan Tapan by the RA
President’s Press Office, issues concerning the current stage of
negotiations regarding the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict
were discussed during the meeting.
From: Baghdasarian

Bako Sahakian’s victory is a result of a political consensus

BAKO SAHAKIAN’S VICTORY IS A RESULT OF A POLITICAL CONSENSUS
By Karine Mangassarian

Yerkir.am
July 27, 2007

Commenting on the presidential elections held in Nagorno Karabagh on
July 19 representative of the ARF’s Supreme Board Armen Rustamian
stated that despite the unjustified statements made by different
international structures before the elections, the statements did
not have any influence on the attitudes of the Karabagh voters.

"These statements had nothing to do with the processes going on in
the region and the line the people of Karabagh have chosen and are
following up to date," Rustamian stated:

A.R.: The people of Karabagh gave the best response to these groundless
statements by actively participating in the elections. This testifies
that the people of Karabagh take ownership of their fate. The people
showed that they made their choice for their own benefit and not
for the recognition or assessment by any international organizations
pursuing their political interests.

Q: What were the peculiarities of these elections?

A: There are several peculiarities. Particularly, these elections were
held based on the newly adopted constitution. These were the first
presidential elections for a country that has a constitution. People
were electing a president whose authority is clearly defined as
opposed to the last elections when the president’s authority was
defined by laws. Finally, it should be stated that the whole process
of the elections deserves the highest praise.

We visited almost all precincts in Hadrut region and observed a
highly active participation. The turnout figure that was announced
fully corresponds to the reality. The second important peculiarity
is that the mechanisms provided for in the Electoral Code of the
Nagorno Karabagh Republic make the expression of the people’s will
fully possible. We have not observed any violations in any of the
precincts that we visited.

Proxies of all candidates were present. There are no doubts that
these elections corresponded to the international standards.

Q: International observers also visited Nagorno Karabagh Republic to
observe the elections. The international observers had a positive
assessment of the elections in their statements. How do you think
these statements can reach the international organizations dealing
with the Karabagh settlement?

A: The international observers did not represent politicized
organizations.

They were mostly from NGOs, experts of the electoral process who
had experience of observation missions. Our interactions with
the observers showed that they too had a good impression of the
elections. These international NGOs are rather famous and have
experience of international observation of elections.

Their statements should not be ignored by the international political
organizations. The latter must listen to these statements. Not
taking this into consideration means closing your eyes not to see the
reality. I think this strategy cannot last long and sooner or later
the fact of the Nagorno Karabagh Republic will be internationally
recognized. They should understand that the Nagorno Karabagh Republic
is a full-fledged state, it is a consolidated state with all its
attributes. Any neutral observer who visited Karabagh can confirm
this. All this will lead the international community to consider the
facts and recognize the Nagorno Karabagh Republic.

Q: The OSCE Chairman-in-Office Moratinos made a statement saying "The
presidential elections in the Nagonro Karabagh Republic should not
affect the peaceful settlement of the conflict." What is the logic
behind this statement?

A: It should be noted that the international organizations that view
this issue on the platform of recognition or non-recognition are
putting themselves in a very funny situation.

It is the right of any state or organization but denunciation of
elections is not only strange but those who denounce the elections
often make themselves more vulnerable. These organizations put forward
two arguments both of which are groundless. The first argument is
that since the conflict is not resolved yet such elections hinder
the settlement process.

This is a completely groundless statement because people living in
Karabagh cannot wait for the political settlement of the conflict. It
is the people’s primary right to organize their lives in accordance
with the accomplishments of the humanity. These accomplishments
include the people’s right to form their government democratically
and in a sovereign manner. If they do not accept this, what do they
offer? Nothing.

They say, wait till the conflict is settled. What does this
mean? People are living and they cannot wait. The conflict’s being
frozen does not mean that people’s lives are also frozen. This is
where an illogical situation emerges.

The other argument is that the elections cannot be legitimate because
the not all the citizens living in this territory participate in them,
meaning the displaced persons and the refugees. If we think in this
way, the elections in Azerbaijan are also not legitimate because a
great number of people that are refugees today do not participate in
the presidential elections in Azerbaijan.

Double standards should not be applied. Those who made these statements
should answer why they are preventing democratic processes in the
region. It is these statements that hinder the democratic development
of the region.

Human rights and the rights of the people must dominate over any
other rights, political interests and calculations. I am sure the
international organizations will come to understand this with time.

Q: The high turnout was and the majority of votes for Bako Sahakian
were discussed in the post-electoral period. How justified are these
manipulations?

A: People often say that the high turnout and the votes received by
Bako Sahakian seem to cast a shadow over the democratic processes
in Karabagh.

But we should take into consideration two important factors. First
of all, we are speaking about a united candidate. Bako Sahakian
was the united candidate of the main influential political forces in
Karabagh. These forces do have such a wide public support. And it took
them quite some time to get to the nomination of a united candidate.

This was an agreement reached through long negotiations based on the
most important issues and the interests of the Karabagh people. The
people of a non-recognized republic are doing their best to get
recognition for their state and to be able to form a government that
would ensure its security. In other words, the issue of a secure
future is much more important for the Karabagh people than for other
countries. This is the reason for the voters’ activeness and the high
turnout. People voted for the candidate who can ensure their security
in the best possible way.
From: Baghdasarian

Delegation Of PACE Sub-Committee On The Cultural Heritage To Visit T

DELEGATION OF PACE SUB-COMMITTEE ON THE CULTURAL HERITAGE TO VISIT THE REGION

armradio.am
27.07.2007 13:26

At the end of August the delegation of the Parliamentary Assembly of
the Council of Europe (PACE) Sub-Committee on the Cultural Heritage
headed by British MP Edward O’Hara will arrive in the region.

The British Deputy told APA Azerbaijani news agency that the
mission will spend a week in the region. Visits to Nagorno Karabakh,
Nakhijevan, Baku, Yerevan and Tbilisi are expected.
From: Baghdasarian

RA Foreign Minister Visits Ajaria

RA FOREIGN MINISTER VISITS AJARIA

Noyan Tapan
Jul 27, 2007

BATUMI, JULY 27, NOYAN TAPAN. RA Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian being
in Georgia on a working visit visited Batumi on July 27, where he met
with Ajarian Prime Minister Levan Varshalomidze. The interlocutors
discussed the possibilities of economic cooperation development,
touched upon issued connected with opening of a RA Consulate General
in Batumi and Armenian tourists’ visits.

V. Oskanian also visited the Surb Khach (St Saviour) Armenian church
of Batumi and spoke to the Armenian pastor of Ajaria, monk Father
Kirakos Davtian.

As Noyan Tapan was informed by the RA Foreign Ministry Press and
Information Department, on July 28, V. Oskanian will visit Javakhk and
will meet with representatives of the Armenian community and Armenian
deputies of Georgian parliament in Akhalkalak. The Minister will also
visit the Surb Khach (St Cross) church and will meet with Javakhk’s
pastor monk Babken Salbian.

The same day, in the Lori region, the RA Foreign Minister will
meet with heads of diplomatic representations and international
organizations accredited in Georgia.
From: Baghdasarian

Heritage Party Leader Meets With Chief Of US Mission To Armenia

HERITAGE PARTY LEADER MEETS WITH CHIEF OF US MISSION TO ARMENIA

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
July 27 2007

YEREVAN, July 27. /ARKA/. Chairman of the Armenian opposition party
Heritage Raffi Hovannisian received the new chief of the US mission
to Armenia, Ambassador Rudolf Perina, at the National Assembly today.

The sides exchanged views on Armenia’s diplomacy and domestic affairs,
Armenian-American relations and Nagorno-Karabakh’s road to liberty
and democracy, the party’s press service reports.

Founded in 2002, the Heritage Party is a national-liberal political
force. At present the party has 5,000 members. In 2007, the party
first participated in the parliamentary elections and received seven
seats in Parliament.
From: Baghdasarian

Azerbaijan: Life On The Frontlines

AZERBAIJAN: LIFE ON THE FRONTLINES
Text by Rovshan Ismayilov. Photos by Rena Effendi

EurasiaNet, NY
July 26 2007

Thirteen years after the cease-fire agreement that brought an end to
fighting between Azerbaijan and Armenia over the breakaway region
of Nagorno Karabakh, villagers still living along the Azerbaijani
frontline remain trapped in a state of neither peace nor war.

Tens of Azerbaijani villages and settlements, stretching from the
southwestern town of Horadiz to the northwestern Terter region, are
strung along the roughly 120-kilometer-long frontline that divides
Armenian and Azerbaijani forces. According to government statistics,
they contain some 150,000 people.

Some, like the village of Chirahli in Agdam region, have become
ghost towns; only 10 families are left to occupy the 100 houses still
standing there. Still others, battle sites during the last two years
of the 1988-1994 war, look as if the fighting ended only yesterday.

But still, their inhabitants stay on. "It is very difficult to live
here. No money, no good prospects. But we are keen to stay in the
village," said Yashar Ahmedov, a farmer who lives in Mirashalli village
on the frontlines in Agdam region, an area mostly controlled by the
Armenian army. "If we leave this place then everyone else will go,
too. We don’t want to give up our lands."

Gunfire and occasional shell explosions are routine for frontline
residents, making security their major concern. According to
the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry, up to 200 people, many of them
civilians, are killed each year from cease-fire violations. Even more,
the ministry says, are wounded.

To avoid Armenian sniper fire from a few kilometers away, cab drivers
dim their lights at night when driving to Azerbaijani-controlled
villages within Agdam region. Further to the south, in villages like
Horadiz in Fizuli region, some 150 meters from the frontline, houses
are reinforced with horizontal cement slabs and top floor windows
are sometimes covered with metal and wood to shield from such attacks.

Some of the worst damage can come from the debris of war itself.

According to the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Actions (ANAMA),
a government body that works to clear Azerbaijan of land mines,
approximately 116.8 million square meters of Azerbaijani land are
suspected to be mined; another 47.1 million square meters have been
identified as still containing unexploded ordnance. Over 80 percent
of the 1,953 mine victims in ANAMA’s records are civilians living in
areas along the cease-fire line.

Economic problems rank a close second to security concerns for
frontline residents. Poverty rates in frontline settlements are
Azerbaijan’s highest. People here mostly get by with odd jobs. Nasimi
Mammadov, a 39-year-old resident of Guzanli village in the Agdam
region, says that the lack of land reform poses the biggest obstacle
for frontline families.

Unlike elsewhere, in frontline areas the government retains ownership
of all land and artesian wells for irrigation."[A]grarian reforms
here are lagging behind other regions," Mammadov said. "Our farmers
cannot take loans from banks because they have no land to put down
as collateral."

Meanwhile, the population is growing larger. About 30,000 Internally
Displaced Persons (IDPs) from the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh
and surrounding occupied regions were recently moved to the frontline
Fizuli, Agdam and Terter regions from tent settlements around the
country. The IDPs occupy new houses built by the government over the
past two years out of proceeds from the State Oil Fund.

"[It] only reinforced the unemployment level," commented Mammadov.

"There are not enough jobs, not enough land for ploughing,
infrastructure is underdeveloped."

Residents largely depend on the government’s monthly IDP aid payouts of
4 manats (about $5) and not having to pay income tax or for utilities.

Access to healthcare adds to the challenges. Some villages do not even
have a first aid station. No hospital exists. Sick villagers must be
transported long distances over badly damaged roads to medical clinics
in regional centers such as Beylagan, Barda or Ganja, depending on
the location.

A sense of apathy prevails. Older people who remember pre-war times
are becoming fewer and fewer, while many other residents are moving
to Baku or elsewhere in the Commonwealth of Independent States.

Yet even in these blighted villages, normal activities can be seen.

Children play soccer just a few meters from military trenches. New
wedding palaces are being built. The government plans to open a huge
sports center in the village of Guzanli.

"Life is continuing," concluded Guzanli resident Mammadov. The
frontline residents who remain behind "are somehow adjusting."

Editor’s Note: Rovshan Ismayilov is a freelance journalist based in
Baku. Rena Effendi is a freelance photojournalist also based in Baku.
From: Baghdasarian