NYT ARTICLE SLAMS U.S. FOR SACRIFICING JUSTICE IN AXE-KILLER CASE FOR AZERI OIL
PanARMENIAN.Net
September 10, 2012 – 18:51 AMT
PanARMENIAN.Net – In recent days there have been two symbolic events
that run the danger of igniting hostilities in an already tense
neighborhood of the Caucasus, The New York Times-published article
titled “Two Steps Backwards in the Caucasus” said.
“On Aug. 31 a former Azerbaijan Army lieutenant, Ramil Safarov, flew
back to Baku after serving eight years in a Budapest jail for killing
Gurgen Margaryan in 2004. The victim, an Armenian officer, had been a
fellow participant in a NATO Partnership for Peace exercise. Safarov
hacked him to death in his sleep with an ax.
Immediately upon his arrival in Baku, Lieutenant Safarov was pardoned
by President Ilham Aliyev, restored to military duties, promoted to
major, given an apartment and awarded back pay for his time in prison.
These actions drew universal condemnation from Washington, Moscow
and European governments.
Apart from the fact that such a step is an affront to basic notions of
justice and the rule of law, even more troubling is the message that it
sends to the rest of the world: that the Azerbaijani government thinks
it is acceptable to kill Armenians. Apparently, the grievances they
suffered in their defeat by Armenian forces in 1992-94 are so profound
that even murder is excusable. It is hard, then, to ask the Armenians
living in Karabakh to quietly accept the idea that the solution to
the issue is for them to return to living under Azerbaijani rule,”
Professor Peter Rutland said in his article.
“Compounding the problem was a less significant but still noteworthy
gesture. On Sept. 3, Richard Morningstar, the new U.S. ambassador to
Azerbaijan, paid his respects to Heidar Aliyev, the deceased former
president (and father of the incumbent), by laying a wreath at his
statue in central Baku. Apparently it is standard protocol for U.S.
ambassadors to include this stop in their round of duties when arriving
in Baku. Photographs also clearly showed the ambassador bowing his
head before the monument, though a State Department spokesman later
denied this.
Mr. Morningstar’s far from empty gesture sent two wrong signals.
First, it is disheartening to democratic activists to see the United
States so cravenly supporting dictatorship as a suitable form of
rule, a pattern all too familiar from U.S. policy toward the entire
Middle East.
Second, it signals to Armenia – and its principal ally, Russia –
that the United States is an unqualified backer of the Azerbaijani
government, warts and all. Strategic interests – Caspian oil, access
to Central Asia, containment of Iran – count for more than the niceties
of human rights and democratic procedure.
This makes it all but impossible for Armenia to expect the United
States to act as an honest broker in the peace process. And if the
United States cannot play that role, no one else will.
Diplomacy has long revolved around such symbolic acts. When Chancellor
Willy Brandt fell to his knees before the monument to the Warsaw
Ghetto in 1970 he turned a page in German atonement for its past
atrocities. In the same spirit, Vladimir Putin sent a clear message
of reconciliation when in 2010 he knelt at the monument to the Polish
officers killed at Katyn on Stalin’s orders.
What we need in the Caucasus are leaders willing to follow the examples
of Mr. Brandt and Mr. Putin, with the courage to show contrition and
a willingness to meet with their former adversary and figure out a way
to live together. We may be in for a long wait,” the article concluded.