Agreement on Loriberd hydropower plant signed in Frankfurt

Agreement on Loriberd hydropower plant signed in Frankfurt

December 8, 2012 – 19:45 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan met with senior vice
president of Oracle EMEA Ltd. Alain Blanc in the framework of
Frankfurt-hosted Armenian-German business forum.
The company’s possible involvement in Armenia’s IT sector was in the
focus of the meeting, with the formation of free trade area in
Armenia, Gyumri Technopark and a number of educational programs
discussed.
Mr. Blanc, in turn, expressed the company’s readiness to implement
programs in Armenia, confessing to the awareness of a number of
projects in progress.
The forum further featured signing of an agreement on financing the
Loriberd Hydro Power Plant program.

Armenia’s PM meets in Frankfurt with Oracle Co. vice president

Armenia’s PM meets in Frankfurt with Oracle Corporation vice president

news.am
December 08, 2012 | 16:37

YEREVAN. – Within the framework of the Armenian-German Business Forum
being held in Frankfurt, Germany, Armenia’s Premier Tigran Sargsyan
met with Vice President Alain Blanc of the Oracle Corporation, which
specializes in the Information Technology (IT) sector.

The interlocutors discussed the opportunities for Oracle’s engagement
in Armenia’s IT sector, the Government press service informs. Also,
the company official was introduced to several programs that pose an
interest for cooperation.

In his turn, Alain Blanc stressed that they are interested in
implementing programs in Armenia and are familiar with those of
numerous other companies that operate in the country.

Vahagn Charchoghlyan’s name not included in amnesty list

Vahagn Charchoghlyan’s name not included in amnesty list

Saturday,
December 08

`There are political prisoners with Armenian nationality among the
arrested and freed by the Georgian Parliament, the name of the famous
political activist Vahagn Chakhalyan is not found in the list,’ said
expert in Georgian studies Alik Eroyants to Aysor.am touching upon the
decision of the Georgian Parliament about granting amnesty to 190
political prisoners.

He mentioned that Vahagn Chakhalyan’s crime was considered a serious
offense and according to the Georgian side that was why that he was
not included in that list.

`Vahagn Chakhalyan’s supporters who struggled for his freedom had done
a lot on international level, however Chakhalyan’s PR inside Georgia
was weak,’ Eroyants noticed.

According to him, active work of Chakhalyan’s proponents in the future
may affect positively on his release.

The expert of Georgian studies noticed that amnesty was granted to
around 2.000-3.000 people in general, and to many political prisoners
in that number.

`During Saakashvili’s reign many prisons have been built, the coming
power, however, has decided not to keep so many prisoners. It is
included in their new political course, it can also be called a kind
of political gesture,’ the speaker added.

TODAY, 14:06

Aysor.am

Earthquake Anniversary: 24 years on, some in Gyumri still live in ma

Earthquake Anniversary: 24 years on, some in Gyumri still live in
makeshift conditions

SOCIETY | 07.12.12 | 12:33

Archive Photo: Photolure

A street clock in Gyumri stopped in the aftermath of the earthquake to
show the time when a devastating tremor struck the city on December 7,
1988
By SIRANUYSH GEVORGYAN
ArmeniaNow reporter

Nearly a quarter of a century after the 1988 devastating earthquake
there are still families in Armenia that live with the consequences of
that natural disaster.

A powerful tremor struck the Spitak region of Armenia close to midday
December 7, 1988, at a time when most children were in schools and
adults at work. As a result, the earthquake measuring 6.9 on the
Richter scale killed at least 25,000 people, causing vast destruction
in the towns and villages in large parts of northern Armenia.

Twenty-four years on, however, some people in the affected areas still
continue to live in rusty metal makeshifts. And in certain areas, like
Gyumri, there are still earthquake-damaged buildings that have not
been torn down till today.

Successive Armenian governments have promised to eliminate the
consequences of the earthquake and the very notion of the disaster
area, but the challenge is on despite efforts to provide immediate
earthquake survivors with new housing.

Still, even after the completion of the 2008-2013 housing construction
program of the current government Gyumri alone will have about 4,000
families living in huts. These families who, too, consider themselves
to be the ones bearing the consequences of the earthquake, have not
been included in the lists of beneficiaries – they are usually the
second generation of earthquake survivors with their own new families
who had nowhere else to live but these slums. Other such people are
not immediate victims of the earthquake or their descendants or had
received new homes, but had to sell them because of their debts and go
back to living in makeshift housing.

In October as many as 1,756 families in Gyumri received new
apartments. Since 2010, 2,812 of officially registered 4,270 homeless
families in Gyumri have received housing of their own as part of the
government program. Authorities have promised to provide an additional
1,351 apartments in Gyumri in 2013, but for various reasons they have
been reluctant to address the problems of the people who are left out
of the housing construction program.

Members of the `The City is Ours’ civic group that was set up in
Gyumri before last May’s parliamentary elections demand that these
families, too, be enabled to leave their old metal housing and
provided with proper living conditions. They have stressed the general
unemployment and poverty in the city and the province that they say
have reached `alarming proportions’. According to official data, an
estimated 47 percent of people in Gyumri live in poverty, which is
higher than the average poverty rate for Armenia (about 35 percent).

The group has urged the National Assembly, the president and the
government of Armenia to recognize all groups of citizens who
currently live in makeshift housing in the earthquake area as
beneficiaries of the state housing programs and provide them with
homes according to the actual number of family members within the next
two years.

Under the currently applied regulations, families get apartments of
the size that they used to have before the earthquake. The program
does not take into account the natural growth of families, on the
other hand, if a family shrinks by a person, it gets a smaller
apartment (by one room).

The civil initiative also advocates the rights of other people without
homes, calling for the construction of social housing for them or
subsidizing loans or the purchase of building materials for them to
solve their housing problems by themselves.

Karine Lazarian, a member of the group, considers this demand to be
only fair as she says that many people in her native town have to live
in huts in inhuman conditions.

`If the government could pay them compensations, their children would
not have to grow up in rotten metal cottages, in damp conditions,
surrounded by rats. I consider that the rights of these people are not
protected and it is immoral to deprive them of their rights,’
Lazarian says.

The activist does not consider the government pledge to rehabilitate
the earthquake area to have been fulfilled yet, as she points to the
general problems that exist in Gyumri.

`You can still find collapsed buildings in visible parts of the city.
These earthquake rubbles have not been dismantled until today. We feel
like we have been tinned and preserved since those times. We
psychologically feel like we are detached from the rest of Armenia,
because even the traces of the earthquake have not been completely
removed here,’ says Lazarian.

The woman cites the example of Spitak, the town situated nearer the
epicenter of the 1988 earthquake that also suffered great human loss
and vast destruction. She says that traces of devastation are barely
seen in Spitak today, which makes it easier for the townsfolk to cope
with current difficulties of life. Meanwhile, she says, people in
Gyumri have been able to only partly get rid of the disaster zone
mentality.

Lazarian, who runs a small production of clothes and accessories in
Gyumri, also attaches importance to creating jobs and training
qualified workforce for the future development of the town.

Speaking from her own experience, the 33-year-old businesswoman says
that skilled workers are still hard to find in Gyumri despite the
presence of many vocational schools.

`We have a lot of institutions that train designers and tailors in
Gyumri, but I still can’t find a proper worker for my enterprise, a
worker who would meet the modern-day requirements of the market,’ says
Lazarian.


See a photo story by ArmeniaNow photo correspondent Nazik Armenakyan
from last year about domik life in Gyumri

`Temporary’ for 23 Years: `Domik’ life in Gyumri

http://www.armenianow.com/society/41769/armenia_earthquake_anniversary_december7_1988_housing

ANCA: Minsk Group’s False Symmetry Undermines Prospects For Peace

ANCA Says Minsk Group’s False Symmetry Undermines Prospects For Peace

Friday, December 7th, 2012 | Posted by Contributor

OSCE Ministerial summit convened in Dublin this week

WASHINGTON – Armenian National Committee of AmericaExecutive Director
Aram Hamparian expressed regret at the latest statement by the Heads
of Delegation of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE) Minsk Group Co-Chair countries in Dublin, Ireland, this
week which demonstrated an artificial even-handedness toward
Azerbaijan and Armenia, with no mention of the ongoing Aliyev
government’s aggression against Armenia and glorification of
anti-Armenian attacks, including the praise and promotion of convicted
Azerbaijani axe-murderer Ramil Safarov.

Hamparian’s complete statement is available below:

`The Heads of Delegation of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair countries do
a disservice to the cause of peace by, once again, seeking to impose a
false symmetry on the Nagorno Karabakh situation.’

`For all their patently political and artificial attempts at
evenhandedness, the facts on the ground are undeniable: Azerbaijan is
the party that started, and lost, a war aimed at destroying democracy
in Artsakh and preventing self-determination for the people of this
proud Republic. It is Azerbaijan that regularly commits fatal
cross-border attacks, and is threatening to use its rapidly expanding
arsenal of arms to restart its open aggression and plunge the region
into conflict. It is Baku, not Yerevan, that is rejecting
international calls to pull back its snipers and deploy more OSCE
observers, and that is vetoing the participation of the Republic of
Nagorno Karabakh – the key stakeholder in any enduring settlement –
from full participation in the peace process.’

`It is an act of undeserved charity to the Azerbaijani regime of Ilham
Aliyev to call on both parties to refrain from acts of enmity, when
the record shows that the only state-sponsored incitement to hatred
has come from Baku – through both words and actions. Examples include
Azerbaijan’s cross-border, fatal attacks on Armenia during Secretary
Clinton’s visit this summer to the region, as well as the Azerbaijani
military’s documented destruction and desecration of the Armenian
cemetery in Djulfa. More recently, of course, was President Ilham
Aliyev’s pardon and promotion of an unapologetic axe-murderer, Ramil
Safarov, who is, today, hailed as a hero in Azerbaijan for killing an
Armenian officer, Gurgen Margaryan, while he slept, during a 2004 NATO
training exercise in Hungary.’

`Inventing a pretend parity between the parties may serve some
political purpose, but, sadly, such contrived statements by the OSCE
Minsk Group do nothing to advance the cause of peace.’

http://asbarez.com/106982/anca-says-minsk-group%E2%80%99s-false-symmetry-undermines-prospects-for-peace/

Gazprom lance la construction de son gazoduc South Stream vers l’UE

RUSSIE
Gazprom lance la construction de son gazoduc South Stream vers l’UE

Le géant gazier russe Gazprom lance vendredi, en présence du président
russe Vladimir Poutine, les travaux de construction du gazoduc South
Stream, destiné à livrer du gaz russe à l’Union européenne via la mer
Noire en évitant l’Ukraine.

Le groupe public a convié plus de cent journalistes et officiels sur
les hauteurs de la station balnéaire d’Anapa, au bord de la mer Noire,
où la cérémonie officielle devait débuter à 11H00 GMT, sous haute
sécurité.

L’emplacement, au milieu des vignes recouvertes vendredi par la brume,
constitue le point de départ du gazoduc.

M. Poutine, le patron de Gazprom Alexeï Miller et celui du consortium
South Stream, Marcel Kramer, doivent y prononcer un discours.

Le projet, dont le coût total est estimé à 16,5 milliards d’euros,
doit à terme permettre à Moscou de livrer 63 milliards de mètres cubes
de gaz par an à l’Europe via un tuyau de 2.380 kilomètres de long.
Cela représente 10% de la consommation prévue de l’UE en 2020, selon
les projections de l’Agence internationale de l’Energie (AIE).

Le tracé, via les fonds de la mer Noire, puis la Bulgarie, la Serbie,
la Hongrie, la Slovénie, jusqu’à l’Italie, évite soigneusement le
territoire de l’Ukraine, jusqu’ici principal pays de transit.

Mais les disputes répétées entre Moscou et Kiev sur le prix du gaz,
qui ont perturbé à plusieurs reprises les approvisionnements au coeur
de l’hiver, ont poussé Gazprom, allié avec les électriciens européens,
à chercher d’autres voies de livraisons.

La partie sous-marine du gazoduc est ainsi portée par un consortium
détenu outre Gazprom (50%), par l’italien Eni (20%), le français EDF
(15%) et l’allemand Wintershall (15%), filiale de BASF.

Au nord, le géant public russe a déjà ouvert les vannes de Nord Stream
entre la Russie et l’Allemagne via la mer Baltique. Lancé en novembre
2011, ce tuyau de 1.220 kilomètres a vu sa capacité passer à 55
milliards de m3 par an grce à la mise en service début octobre d’une
seconde conduite.

Pour autant, le lancement des travaux du pendant sud de la toile
gazière russe vers l’Europe intervient à un moment difficile pour
Gazprom sur le marché européen.

La crise économique a fait chuter la consommation de l’UE d’environ
11%, selon l’AIE, qui estime que le mouvement s’est poursuivi cette
année.

L’organisation internationale, qui représente les intérêts des pays
consommateurs, ne s’attend à voir la demande retrouver ses niveaux de
2010 qu’à la fin de la décennie actuelle.

La situation a poussé de nombreux clients de Gazprom à contester les
termes très contraignants des contrats à long terme de livraisons,
poussant le groupe russe à accorder des rabais à plusieurs d’entre
eux, parmi lesquels le français GDF Suez.

Politiquement aussi, les relations se sont tendues. Gazprom est la
cible d’une enquête de la Commission européenne pour entrave à la
concurrence.

`S’il y a des conséquences pour nous, il y aura des conséquences pour
eux`, a sèchement lché fin novembre le vice-Premier ministre russe
Arkadi Dvorkovitch, citant le risque d’une hausse de prix si le groupe
russe réduisait ses livraisons.

Peu avant, le vice-président de Gazprom, Alexandre Medvedev, disait se
demander si Bruxelles voulait recevoir du gaz en quantités croissantes
dans les années à venir.

Présente à Anapa, la directrice de l’AIE, Maria van der Hoeven, s’est
dit confiante dans les perspectives de croissance à long terme de la
demande européenne, qui selon elle devrait passer de 340 milliards de
mètres cubes par an actuellement à 500 milliards en 2035.

`C’est plus que suffisant pour que l’Europe garde sa place de premier
marché pour l’importation de gaz dans le monde`, a-t-elle déclaré lors
d’une conférence de presse.

Mais `le marché ne sera pas dirigé par les mêmes certitudes auxquelles
sont habitués les exportateurs`, a-t-elle prévenu, citant la
concurrence de la Norvège, de l’Algérie, voire de l’Amérique du Nord
grce au gaz de schiste.

Gazprom cherche actuellement à s’orienter, à coups d’investissements
massifs, vers le marché asiatique, où les prix sont relativement
élevés et la demande plus solide.

samedi 8 décembre 2012,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

Azerbaijan Reserves Blood For War

AZERBAIJAN RESERVES BLOOD FOR WAR

news.am
December 07, 2012 | 22:16

BAKU. – Azerbaijan collects blood reserve for the war. It is not
yet stated against what country Baku is going to fight, however,
Armenia may suppose it.

“There is always blood reserve at the Central Blood Bank of the
Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology named after Eyvazov under
the Ministry of Healthcare,” director of the Institute Sultan Aliyev
told APA.

However, they reserve blood at the Central Blood Bank for the future
war. He said that Azerbaijan was at war and strategic blood reserves
are collected at the Central Blood Bank. This blood may be only used
in case of accidents in the future.

125th Anniversary Of Armenian School In Istanbul

125TH ANNIVERSARY OF ARMENIAN SCHOOL IN ISTANBUL

20:42, 7 December, 2012

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 7, ARMENPRESS: Private Kedron Armenian School in
Istanbul will celebrate its 125th anniversary with an exhibition. As
reports Armenpress referring to Turkish “Dogan” news agency, the
exhibition is dedicated to the first awarded woman sculptor in Turkey
Mari Kerekmezyan. The exhibition will launch in the hall of the school
on December 8-23.

Works of painter, photographer, architect, designer graduators of
the school will be displayed in the exhibition.

"Clan Fight": Analysts See PAP-RPA Standoff As Oligarchic Showdown

“CLAN FIGHT”: ANALYSTS SEE PAP-RPA STANDOFF AS OLIGARCHIC SHOWDOWN
By Gayane Abrahamyan

ArmeniaNow
Politics | 07.12.12 | 16:52

The confrontation between Armenia’s two major political forces has
shifted to mutual accusations baring the existing contradictions and
implying that Gagik Tsarukyan’s nomination for presidential candidacy
is an almost unavoidable prospect. Experts say, however, that this
is rather a “clan war” than a political battle and the outcome will
be dictated by external forces.

Prosperous Armenia party (PAP) leader Tsarukyan’s European “adventures”
have heightened the tensions springing from what’s becoming fierce
domestic political fight.

Tsarukyan’s visit to Brussels where he voiced sharp criticism against
president Serzh Sargsyan’s administration, saying there should be
no expectation of curtailing corruption in Armenia so long as the
country itself was led by corrupt authorities, coincided with one of
the European Parliament’s major political forces, European People’s
Party (EPP) leaders’ summit in Yerevan.

PAP was not represented at the summit, as exactly a year ago EPP
admitted three Armenian parties – the ruling Republicans (RPA), Rule
of Law (Orinats Yerkir) and oppositional Heritage, but rejected PAP’s
membership request.

Mostly known for his pro-Russian positions, Tsarukyan’s visit
to Brussels was a demarche against this very summit. The visit
has deepened the split between RPA and PAP so much that Republican
speaker Eduard Sharmazanov not only qualified Tsarukyan’s comments as
“shameful”, but called PAP “an artificial force”, “populist”, reminded
him of the risks and accused of ambitions “to usurp the power”.

“PAP, according to our European counterparts, is not leading a battle
on ideological grounds or platforms, but one that is aimed at usurping
the power,” Sharmazanov said in his interview to RFL/RE.

It is exactly with charges of “attempts to usurp power” that the
defendants in the Case of Seven – leading oppositional figures former
MP Sasun Mikayelyan, former foreign minister Alexander Arzumanyan
and others – got convicted in 2008.

This seemingly superficial use of the same term, most probably done
as a reminder, might become crucial in RPA-PAP negotiations which,
as Edgar Vardanyan, expert at Armenian Center for National and
International Studies (ACNIS) says, are more like a “clan showdown”.

Vardanyan says political terminology is alien to the domestic political
field of Armenia, and gangland terminology is more befitting, because
the main political parties here are “clans” rather than parties.

“To apply the term ‘political party’ in reference to our main ruling
forces, means to legitimize clans, because they serve the interests
of certain clans. Hence we are not dealing with a political fight,
but inter-clan showdown,” he told ArmeniaNow.

According to the expert, one of the “clans” of the oligarchic
regime is formed “around Serzh Sargsyan or he is viewed as its
formal representative, and the other one is around Tsarukyan, who
is its official representative. We all know that there is another –
informal – representative [Robert Kocharyan].”

Vardanyan believes that the procrastination in this “showdown” aimed at
centralizing the resources, suggests interference of external forces.

“If the two clans were functioning on their own, there won’t be
any serious, grounded reason not to come to an agreement and this
time-dragging that is past any logical deadlines clearly points to
pressure from the outside,” he said.

“It is quite possible that Russia doesn’t fully trust the incumbent
president, and unwilling to put all its eggs in one basket, intends to
strengthen the second oligarchic team, so that both are most interested
in serving the Kremlin to solicit its support,” says Vardanyan.

The idea of external pressure is shared also by Armen Badalyan,
expert in political technologies, who believes that “the outcome of
these elections will not be determined inside Armenia”.

Following this logic the issue of Tsarukyan’s candidacy for presidency
becomes irrelevant, because, as political analyst Vardanyan says,
“whatever decision is made it will be after acquiring certain
agreements”.

“If until now the existing conflict has not been an imitation, the
further fight will be ‘coordinated’, since it is impossible to hold
elections without prior agreement with the other powerful clan, and in
a clan-ruled environment it is impossible to be an opposition and at
the same time preserve all the resources and stay part of oligarchy,”
he says.

And while European structures welcome the competition between the
major forces in the election process, the true picture behind it,
as Vardanyan says, contains “not a single element of democratization,
just as no state interest can be detected in the activities of various
mafia groupings.”

http://armenianow.com/news/politics/41794/gagik_tsarukyan_serzh_sargsyan_pap_rpa

Brouhaha From Brussels: Tsarukyan Comments May Be Last Word On Rpa-P

BROUHAHA FROM BRUSSELS: TSARUKYAN COMMENTS MAY BE LAST WORD ON RPA-PAP RELATIONS
By John Hughes

Photo: Youtube video screenshot

ArmeniaNow Chief Editor

Debate over the approaching presidential election in Armenia has amped
up significantly this week, focusing on the fraying relationship
between tycoon Gagik Tsarukyan’s Prosperous Armenia Party (PAP) and
the Republican Party of Armenia (RPA), led by President Serzh
Sargsyan.

As recently as six months ago, PAP held ministerial positions in
Sargsyan’s Government and was maintaining its position as a member of
the ruling coalition whose three-member parties (Orinats Yerkir being
the lesser third) had sworn allegiance to a Sargsyan second term. In
February 2011, PAP signed a memorandum avowing to not contest the
incumbent.

Now, however, PAP – following its mandate of 37 seats in the National
Assembly in last May’s parliamentary election – has declared itself an
“alternative force”, not fully siding with Armenia’s opposition (led
by the Armenian National Congress and Levon Ter-Pertrosyan), while
nearly daily distancing itself from the ruling regime.

A visit to Brussels earlier this week, led by Tsarukyan and including
Prosperous Armenia MP and former Minister of Foreign Affairs Vartan
Oskanian, may have driven the widest wedge yet between Armenia’s two
biggest parties and appears to signal PAP’s intention to renege on its
commitment to Sargsyan and, instead, field its own presidential
candidate to stand for election in February.

When Oskanian re-entered public politics by joining PAP last spring,
common speculation was that the former FM was setting himself up for a
run at the presidency, backed by the financial support of
multi-millionaire Tsarukyan, and with the blessing of two-term
president Robert Kocharyan, the perceived “godfather” of the party.

Oskanian, however, has been beset by criminal charges of money
laundering (related to misappropriation of funds at the Civilitas
Foundation which Oskanian founded after leaving office in 2008) that,
on the surface, appear to be thinly-veiled political persecution by
the Sargsyan administration of whom Oskanian has been a vocal critic.

Beginning in summer, whispers of a Tsarukyan candidacy begin to spread
that have now become national conversation as Oskanian, himself, has
excluded himself from his party’s nomination and has said that, should
PAP tender a candidate, it should be Tsarukyan.

Tsarukyan himself has coyly deflected questions on his intentions.

But when, on Tuesday, Tsarukyan led his team to Brussels – the seat of
the European Union – for meetings with EU officials and lawmakers, the
move was seen in Armenia as a possible prelude to an announcement of
his candidacy. PAP had said it would announce its position on the
election by December 3. However it delayed any news, saying now that
an announcement would be forthcoming next week.

While in Brussels, the PAP boss and former World Armwrestling Champion
ripped the Sargsyan government in comments to EU officials, reportedly
telling Alejo Vidal-Quadras Roca, a deputy speaker of the European
Parliament, that there should be no expectation of curtailing
corruption in Armenia so long as the country itself was led by corrupt
(i.e. Sargsyan, et. al.) authorities.

Vidal-Quadras Roca emerged from the meeting with the summation that
Tsarukyan – who made news in the May elections when it was reported
that he kept a pistol in his considerable waistband during campaign
visits – would make a “superb” presidential candidate, based on his
“human and optimistic” traits.

Tsarukyan’s comments sparked rage from RPA on Thursday, as party
spokesman Eduard Sharmazanov called Tsarukyan’s words “shameful”.

In an interview with RFE/RL’s Armenian service (Azatutyun.am),
Sharmazanov lashed out at Tsarukyan, calling PAP an “artificial force”
and saying that his (Sharmazanov’s) party could skewer Tsarukyan if it
chose to by reminding that even European deputies see PAP as a party
that has gained power solely because of Tsarukyan’s “populist
policies”.

If it chose to, Sharmazanov said, his party could attack Tsarukyan by
revealing that “according to some European deputies, the Prosperous
Armenia Party leader has very scant knowledge of international
politics and current political affairs in general.”

Meanwhile, Oskanian said that the Brussels trip would “in no way”
influence PAP’s presidential aspirations. He also refuted the view
that the trip was to solicit support of the European authorities.

Oskanian claims that the officials in Brussels initiated conversation
on the pending presidential elections “because they know that
Prosperous Armenia is quite a strong party”.

http://armenianow.com/news/41765/prosperous_armenia_party_gagik_tsarukyan_oskanian_brussels_trip