Azerbaijan says one dead, one wounded in Armenian attack

MIRAGE News
Dec 28 2020

Azerbaijan’s defence ministry says its army units were attacked by “a leftover Armenian armed group of six” in Nagorno Karabakh, killing one Azerbaijani serviceman and wounding another.

The ministry said the attack took place in the Khojavend region on Sunday afternoon and was thwarted, leaving all six armed attackers dead.

“At about 15:30, an illegal armed group or rather a leftover detachment of the Armenian armed forces consisting of six troops attacked the Azerbaijan Army units in the vicinity of the Aghdam village of the Khojavend region.

“As a result of the attack, a soldier of the Azerbaijan army… was killed and … another serviceman was wounded … who has been evacuated and is in a stable condition now,” said the ministry in a statement.

“All six members of the illegal armed group were destroyed”.

The defence ministry vowed to take strong “decisive measures” if repeat attacks by Armenian troops happen.

The term ‘leftover’ used by the ministry likely refers to the personnel of the Armenian armed forces who have failed to leave the Nagorno Karabakh area despite the Russian obligation on their withdrawal.

Under the November 10 midnight deal signed by the leaders of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia to end the 44-day Nagorno Karabakh War, Russia would deploy a peacekeeping contingent of approximately 2,000 soldiers in parallel with the withdrawal of all Armenian armed forces.

“The peacekeeping forces of the Russian Federation shall be deployed concurrently with the withdrawal of the Armenian troops”, reads the original statement.

It is not clear if the delay in withdrawal is in coordination with Russia, or Armenia has refused to withdraw, or some of its troops have gone rogue. It appears there is a secrecy about it and no information is available on the open sources.

The 9-point agreement also called the tripartite statement essentially says Azerbaijan holds on to areas of Nagorno-Karabakh it regained during the war; Armenia agrees to withdraw by December 1 from the remaining 3 of the 7 adjacent districts (Azerbaijan took back 4 districts  during the war); Russia deploys 1,960-strong peacekeeping forces in the Nagorno Karabakh area in parallel with with the withdrawal of the Armenian military; civilian transport/communications/ infrastructure are restored; prisoners of war are exchanged; refugees/displaced people from the both sides are returned to their homes under the UN commissioner’s supervision.

The new clash comes after there was another incident mid December, raising questions over Russia’s role.

The recent incidents show that there still exists Armenian military presence in the Nagorno Karabakh although Russia completed the deployment of its peacekeeping contingent in mid November.


Armenia Ombudsman departs for Russia to contribute to return of POWs from Azerbaijan

Save

Share

 15:41, 24 December, 2020

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 24, ARMENPRESS. Ombudsman of Armenia Arman Tatoyan is in Moscow, Russia, on a working visit, his Office told Armenpress.

“The main purpose of the visit is to contribute to the return of Armenian captives from Azerbaijan.

Taking into account the specifics of the topic, details on the visit and the meetings will not be published”, the Office said in a statement.

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

Why additional police forces were sent to Armenia’s Syunik on day of PM Pashinyan’s visit?

News.am, Armenia
Dec 24 2020
 
 
 
Why additional police forces were sent to Armenia’s Syunik on day of PM Pashinyan’s visit?
17:16, 24.12.2020
 
 
YEREVAN. – The road was closed in Syunik Province, that’s why police forces were taken there; when they close roads in Yerevan, police forces are sent again. Deputy Chief of Police Ara Fidanyan told about this to reporters, after Thursday’s Cabinet meeting of the government of Armenia, when asked why additional police forces were sent to Syunik Province on the day when Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan was to arrive there.
 
To the question as to whether the local police forces of the province were not enough in this case, he responded that at the time the police forces of the province were engaged in the implementation of various other functions. “The same police were opening the same roads in [the] 2018 [revolution], too. We clearly carry out our actions, both in 2018 and now,” Fidanyan added.
 
 
 
 

Hayastan All Armenian Fund provides temporary housing to more than 100 people displaced from Hadrut

Public Radio of Armenia
Dec 23 2020
Hayastan All Armenian Fund provides temporary housing to more than 100 people displaced from Hadrut

The Hayastan All-Armenian Fund will cover the short-term housing and food needs of more than 100 people displaced from Hadrut currently living in different hotels.

Many people from Artsakh were left without shelter as a result of the war, and displaced families from Artsakh continue to stay in Armenia accommodating in different temporary shelters, guest houses and hotels.

Last week the deputy director of the Hayastan All Armenian Fund Ararat Khlghatyan visited Artsakh to meet with State Minister Grigory Martirosyan and Minister of Urban Development Aram Sargsyan. The current status of the Fund’s projects implemented in Artsakh was monitored and the details of new projects were discussed.

“The Himnadram will try to fund the renovation of war-damaged apartments and houses in Artsakh by investing about 2 million USD.” said Haykak Arshamyan, Executive Director of the Fund.

The Hayastan All Armenian Fund continues to stay true to its mission by contributing to the proportional development of Armenia and Artsakh.


60-man military unit “highly likely” taken captive by Azerbaijan, says Artsakh Ombudsman

Save

Share

 13:52, 16 December, 2020

STEPANAKERT, DECEMBER 16, ARMENPRESS. The Human Rights Defender of Artsakh Artak Beglaryan says he contacted several organizations and servicemen on the ground regarding the information on the troops who went missing in Khtsaberd village. “According to the information that I gathered, a military unit consisting of around 60 servicemen went missing during these days in the direction of the village of Khtsaberd in Hadrut region, and it is highly likely that the video published by the Azerbaijani side shows this very unit,” he said.

“This incident is totally unacceptable and it must be quickly and strictly investigated by law enforcement agencies to determine all circumstances and the circle of those guilty. The authorities of Artsakh and Armenia are obliged to take immediate actions to repatriate all our prisoners of war as soon as possible. In addition, it is necessary to provide clear information to the families of the prisoners of war and conduct maximally transparent public communication to avoid disinformation and unnecessary tensions,” Beglaryan said.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

The 2020 Karabakh War’s Impact on the Northwestern Border of Iran

Jamestown Foundation

Dec 18 2020
Iran security patrols at border with Azerbaijan, September 27 (Source: Asia Times)

The drastically upended situation along the southern edge of the South Caucasus has affected Iran in several complex ways. Among the three large powers surrounding the region—Iran, Russia and Turkey—only Iran borders on the formerly Armenian-occupied Azerbaijani territories of Zangilan, Jabrayil and Fuzuli, which adjoin Upper (“Nagorno) Karabakh. Iran’s northwestern border with the Republic of Azerbaijan is 750 kilometers long, of which about 138 km (Zangilan, Jabrayil and Fuzuli) had been controlled by Armenian forces since the end of the First Nagorno-Karabakh War (1991–1994). On the other hand, Iran’s border with Armenia is only 48 km, and yet it is considered a lifeline for the three million Armenians whose landlocked country has been regionally isolated by Azerbaijan and Turkey. These unique geographical realities have, thus, meant that Iran and its northwestern frontiers have been profoundly impacted by the outcome of the 2020 Karabakh war.

First, the war temporarily undermined the security of Iran’s northwestern border, particularly of the Iranian provinces of Ardabil and Eastern Azerbaijan. These borders were considered safe after 1994; Iran mainly felt threatened along its borders with Afghanistan and Iraq. However, after the Second Karabakh War broke out on September 27, 2020, several rockets and mortar shells inadvertently landed inside Iran, especially in the village of Khoda Afarin, in Eastern Azerbaijan Province, near the Armenia border (Iran Press, October 21). This put Tehran in a precarious position vis-à-vis the two belligerents to its north as it sought to remain neutral in a conflict that was directly affecting its own security (see EDM, October 21, November 5). Iran did, however, quickly move in to safeguard its exposed territories. For the first time since 1994, the regular Iranian Armed Forces, along with units from the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), deployed to the country’s northwest in order to patrol the state borders with Azerbaijan and Armenia. In fact, this operation represented an effort on the part of Tehran to prevent any change in the geopolitics of the region or shift in internationally recognized boundaries (Tehran Times, November 14).

Second, Azerbaijan’s successful retaking of the provinces of Fuzuli, Jabrayil and Zangilan transformed the de facto status of this 138 km section of the frontier with Iran. This important geopolitical change has had three positive implications for the Islamic Republic. First of all, a border with a “de facto state” (the so-called “Republic of Artsakh,” as Armenians refer to separatist Karabakh) has been replaced with a “de jure state” (the Republic of Azerbaijan). Prior to the 2020 Karabakh war, Iran bordered on a gray zone region mainly populated by Armenians (due to conflict-induced population shifts) and run by a regime loyal to Yerevan but recognized internationally as part of Azerbaijan. Second of all, as the war progressed, hostilities shifted further north and away from Iranian territory—in the final weeks centering on Qubadli and Shusha. Should clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan in Karabakh reignite in the future, the conflict will be far from Iranian villages and settlements. Third of all, the outcome of the autumn war means that Iran and the Republic Azerbaijan can now jointly start utilizing the Khoda Afarin Dam, in Jabrayil District, on the Aras River, which straddles their mutual border. This dam was built in 2008 with Tehran’s financial support But the area’s de facto control by Armenian-backed Karabakh (since 1993) prevented Iran from actually exploiting this facility. On December 14, 2020, however, Iranian and Azerbaijani representatives of the Joint Technical Commission on the Khoda-Afarin Dam held a meeting in the Azerbaijani exclave of Nakhchivan to discuss mutual operations of this hydropower plant (IRNA, December 14).

The third major effect of the Second Karabakh War on Iran has been the emergence of novel perceived threats along the 138 km of border with Azerbaijan that is now again under Baku’s control. In particular, Iran has become concerned about the potential appearance of an Israeli intelligence and security presence on its borders. When this area of southwestern Azerbaijan was under Armenian control, Tehran had no reason to be anxious about Israeli surveillance assets operating near Iran’s sensitive northwest. However, during the 2020 Karabakh war, a number of drones, notably including at least one Israeli-made IAI Harop loitering munition, came down inside northwestern Iran. The Iranian authorities have grown concerned that those Israeli-produced unmanned aerial systems could allow Israel to spy on targets in Iran, even following the ceasefire that began on November 10. Another persistent worry in Tehran relates to the various (and sometimes contradictory) widespread rumors of members of the Syria Free Army and Syrian Turkmens ostensibly having been imported to the Karabakh conflict (see EDM, October 23). As recently as November 3, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei declared that “terrorists should never think of approaching Iranian borders because if they do so they will be strongly dealt with” (France 24, November 3).

Finally, the newly inaugurated transit route between Azerbaijan proper and Nakhchivan, across Armenia’s Syunik Province (Zangezur), opened as one of the conditions of the November 10 ceasefire, is another important development affecting northwestern Iran. After the ceasefire went into effect, Iranian social media erupted with wild speculations about whether the land corridor might threaten Iran’s physical connection with Armenia. These worries were even echoed by a few Iranian experts who posited that Zengezur might end up (de jure or de facto) appended to the Republic of Azerbaijan. The heated controversy quickly prompted Iranian officials to provide clarifications on the Armenian-Azerbaijani agreement and to emphasize that “the geographical borders of the Islamic Republic in this region did not change at all and will not change in the future” (Tehran Times, November 16).

This autumn’s 44-day war in Karabakh had both positive and negative implications for Iran’s sensitive northwestern border. Under these circumstances, to safeguard its interests, Tehran will need to develop a more proactive South Caucasus policy that can protect the security of its more than 1,100 kilometers of frontier abutting the region.

https://jamestown.org/program/the-2020-karabakh-wars-impact-on-the-northwestern-border-of-iran/?fbclid=IwAR09vqNfu9eJ8Sh_RXnEesVsG1JD2OkYeghJaNEXXxxdjqaBWtQf0bL2lsg


Aram Khachatryan appointed Governor of Lori province

Save

Share

 11:55,

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 17, ARMENPRESS. Former member of Parliament from the ruling My Step faction Aram Khachatryan has been appointed Governor of Lori province.

The respective decision was adopted today at the Cabinet meeting.

Deputy Prime Minister Tigran Avinyan congratulated Mr. Khachatryan on appointment, wishing success.

Editing and Translating by Aneta Harutyunyan

TURKISH press: Report: Misinformation over Nagorno-Karabakh conflict spread mostly through Twitter

People greet Azerbaijani servicepeople riding in military vehicles during a parade marking Azerbaijan’s victory against Armenia in their conflict for control over the Nagorno-Karabakh region, in Baku on Dec. 10, 2020. (AFP)

The recent Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has witnessed the spread of a massive amount of misinformation on social media, mostly through Twitter, a report revealed on Thursday.

According to the most recent report by Teyit (Confirmation), a Turkish organization that examines the credibility of any suspected data, during the 44-day-long conflict, a total of 33 instances of misinformation have gone viral, mostly through eight different social media platforms and 28 websites. The report – prepared by Sayyara Mammadova, Seçil Türkkan and Ali Osman Arabacı – examined suspected information that has been reported to them and/or they came across. In total, the misinformation in question has been spread through 170 different shares. Eight of every 10 shares were spread through social media, reaching 1,723,532 interactions in total. The misinformation was shared in eight different languages, including Azerbaijani Turkish, Armenian, Russian and Turkish.

About 46% of the misinformation was spread through Twitter, which is followed by Facebook with 24% and Instagram with 17%. Telegram, a texting application that is quite popular in Azerbaijan and Armenia, which enabled the spread of only 3% of the misinformation, has a 14% share of the overall interaction by itself, showing the power of the platform in reaching people.

The 28 websites that have taken part in the spread of the misinformation have done so by making fake news based on the fake data. The number of daily visitors to these websites sharing fake news is determined as 27,936,730. This number is more than double the number of the populations of Azerbaijan and Armenia combined.

The report also revealed that the most common type of misinformation during the war was caused by improper association. For instance, 69,9% of the information and footage that are shared with the claim of coming from the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict were actually scenes from other places that were improperly associated with the war between Azerbaijan and Armenia.

“The periods of conflict and war, when the emotions are quite intense, enable a proper environment for the misinformation to spread in a very intense and fast manner. In this report, we wanted to show the 44-day-long conflict’s reflections on the digital media through misinformation,” Mammadova was quoted as saying by the Demirören News Agency (DHA). She added that the report shows the necessity of a new information ecosystem where media literacy is highly developed.

Relations between the former Soviet republics of Azerbaijan and Armenia have been tense since 1991 when the Armenian military occupied Nagorno-Karabakh, a territory recognized as part of Azerbaijan, and seven adjacent regions.

New clashes erupted on Sept. 27, and the Armenian Army launched attacks on civilians and Azerbaijani forces, violating several humanitarian cease-fire agreements.

During the 44-day conflict, Azerbaijan liberated several cities and nearly 300 settlements and villages from occupation.

The two countries signed a Russia-brokered agreement on Nov. 10 to end the fighting and work toward a comprehensive resolution.

Turkey and Russia signed an agreement for establishing a joint center to monitor the cease-fire in Nagorno-Karabakh immediately after the peace deal, and the two countries will work together there, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said on Nov. 11.

Around 2,000 Russian peacekeepers have been deployed to Nagorno-Karabakh under the terms of the deal and are expected to stay in the region for at least five years.

The Turkish Parliament overwhelmingly approved the deployment of Turkish peacekeeping troops to Azerbaijan. The mandate will allow Turkish forces to be stationed at a security center for one year as part of an accord between Ankara and Moscow to monitor the implementation of the cease-fire, which locked in territorial gains by Azerbaijan.

In this respect, the work of the Turkish troops in the region has already started. Turkey’s Defense Ministry said Wednesday that 136 members of the Special Mine Detection and Clearance Team (OMAT) began clearing mined areas in Nagorno-Karabakh that were liberated from Armenian occupation.

“Clearing of mines and handmade explosives continues in (territories of) Karabakh which were heroically and selflessly liberated from Armenian occupation by the Azerbaijani Armed Forces,” the ministry said in a statement on its website.

It said the Turkish specialist troops will also train Azerbaijani soldiers in mine detection and clearance techniques and tactics.

Promotion of anti-Armenianism in Azerbaijan led to atrocities against Artsakh Armenians – Ombudsman

Save

Share

 19:34,

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 15, ARMENPRESS. Human Rights Defender of Armenia Arman Tatoyan received today former Mayor of French Lyon city, doctor Georges Képénékian and head of the Mothers and Children program of Mérieux Foundation Khalil Etoui.

As ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the Office of the Human Rights Defender of Armenia, during the meeting Arman Tatoyan presented the atrocities committed by Azerbaijani armed forced during September-November against both servicemen and civilians.

According to the Human Rights Defender, targeting the civilian population of Artsakh and using banned weapons against them, involvement of mercenary-terrorists, Armeniaphobia and large-scale atrocities and inhuman treatment speak about Azerbaijani policy of carrying out ethnic cleansings using terroristic methods which continues up till now.

Arman Tatoyan emphasized his conclusion that for years anti-Armenianism and killing Armenians have been propagated in Azerbaijan for years, while the criminals who did it were awarded with state awards. All these are the factors that led Azerbaijani armed forces to grossly violate human rights in Artsakh, including by committing inhuman brutalities and atrocities, which has been reflected in the special report of the Defender.

The participants of the meeting stressed the importance of cooperation in the field of human rights protection and reached an agreement for cooperation.