US DoC SABIT Program announces 2005 SABIT Grant Program

The U.S. Department of Commerce, SABIT Program is pleased to announce
the 2005 SABIT Grant Program
SABIT
February 1, 2005
Please share the following information with U.S. companies and
organizations interested in building commercial partnerships in Eurasia
– Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan.
Applications are available by registering on SABIT’s website (an
automated response will provide a link to the 2005 SABIT Grant
Application to the registrant’s email address):

All applications and supporting documentation must be received by April
1, 2005.
To speak to a SABIT representative about the Grant Program, or to
request a hardcopy of the application, please contact:
Patrick Brennan
SABIT Marketing Coordinator
International Trade Administration
U.S. Department of Commerce
T-(202) 482-2077
F-(202) 482-2443
[email protected]
Visit

BBC TV documentary “Places that don’t exist” (Includes NK)

s/places-that-dont-exist.s
html
HOLIDAYS IN THE DANGER ZONE:
PLACES THAT DON’T EXIST
Part 1: Tuesday 1 February 2005 9pm-10.30pm; 12.30am-2am;
Saturday 5 February 7.30pm-9pm
Part 2: Wednesday 2 February 2005 9pm-10pm; 12.45am-1.45am; Sunday 6
February 11.40pm-12.40am; 2.40am-3.40am
There are almost 200 official countries in the world, but there are dozens
more breakaway states which are determined to be separate and independent.
All of the breakaway states have declared independence after violent
struggles with a neighbour. Some now survive peacefully, but others are a
magnet for terrorists and weapons smuggling, and have armies ready for a
fight.
In these two programmes Simon Reeve visits six such places: Somaliland,
Trans-Dniester and Taiwan (part one); Nagorno-Karabakh, South Ossetia and
Abkhazia (part two).
Interview: Simon Reeve
BBC Four: Was there one country that was the starting point for thinking
about these “places that don’t exist”?
Simon Reeve: Yes. A friend of mine mentioned that he was doing business with
some Somalilanders. I said, “Somaliland? Where’s that?” He said it was a
country in the north of Somalia and to my shame I didn’t know anything about
it. I found out that it’s a functioning state within Somalia. It seemed
extraordinary to me that there is no real government in Somalia but the
world recognises it as a country, and then there’s Somaliland which has
elections and a functioning democracy, but the world doesn’t recognise it as
a proper country. It just seemed a very strange situation. I discovered that
there were all these other countries, some of which I’d vaguely heard of,
some I hadn’t. Then of course there’s Taiwan, which everybody has heard of,
but not everybody knows isn’t recognised as a proper state. It has no seat
at the United Nations and no major countries have an embassy there.
BBC Four: What are the main negative factors affecting these countries
because they are not recognised?
SR: It leaves a lot of these people in limbo. Many people can’t get proper
passports and it’s difficult for them to travel because no other governments
recognise their country. To many of them I also think it’s a bit of an
insult that they’ve built a functioning state and yet the rest of the world
won’t recognise their existence. From our perspective I think it’s better to
bring them inside the international community. When they are outside it
doesn’t give international organisations the chance to keep an eye on what’s
going on. For example, Interpol can’t efficiently operate in Trans-Dniester
because it doesn’t recognise it exists. There are great concerns about the
risks of arms manufacturing there, but nobody can really find out the truth
because they can’t go there.
BBC Four: I got the impression that you enjoyed Trans-Dniester because it
was in such a Soviet time warp.
SR: All the places we went to were fascinating, but Trans-Dniester was very
unusual because it did feel like stepping back in time. I didn’t go to the
old Soviet Union, I was a bit too young then, but Trans-Dniester is how I
imagine it would have been. Indeed, people there said that they didn’t
really want to change when the Soviet Union collapsed, didn’t want to be
become a Western European state, and didn’t want McDonald’s and Starbucks.
They’d kept things pretty much the way they were, so it was a fascinating
place to visit precisely because of that.
BBC Four: Did you have a favourite?
SR: The whole thing was a great adventure frankly and a chance to go to
places that very few people get to visit, and to show people countries
they’ve never even heard of. Somaliland was perhaps the highlight because it
was incredible to see what the people had achieved with virtually nothing.
That was a very moving experience and the people were quite inspirational.
They rebuilt their country after a devastating civil war with very little
help from the outside world, but with sheer hard work and a belief in their
own national identity they’ve been able to build a functioning state.
Speaking on a personal level I find it very sad that their requests for
international recognition fall on deaf ears. This is a country which has
virtually no foreign debt. Now that’s rare in Africa and it’s primarily
because they aren’t recognised so the IMF won’t give them loans. It also
means that there’s not a lot of money sloshing around in the government
coffers so there’s not much corruption. We met the president of Somaliland,
which was quite interesting. He made the point that he runs the country on
just a few million pounds a year. It seems incredible to us that they can do
such things, but everybody accepts that they’ve got less money.
BBC Four: And a least favourite?
SR: Each country was very different and had something special about it.
Everywhere we went we met truly wonderful characters who were brimming with
hospitality. But Nagorno-Karabakh was a place that made me quite sad because
everywhere you went, on both sides, people loathed the other side. There
didn’t seem to be much hope for any improvement for the people there. With
people still in trenches facing the opposition in Azerbaijan – there’s the
threat of war there at any moment.
BBC Four: These programmes always have surreal moments, but this series
seemed to have even more than your last one. Are there any that stick in
your mind that were particularly bizarre or unexpected?
SR: I actually got quite emotional when I saw the Chinese tourists trying to
look at the Taiwanese propaganda. I was more emotional about it off camera
than I was on camera. It just seemed such an extraordinary situation. You
had tourists from a country which is emerging as one of the world’s great
economic, and potentially military, super-powers. They are very keen to find
out what’s happening in the rest of the world, including just over the water
in Taiwan. For years they’ve been able to see these small signs on the
horizon which have been spouting out Taiwanese propaganda, and then as soon
as they try to get close to the signs to see what they say, the Taiwanese
coast guard turns them back. It was a very weird situation.

BBC Four: I enjoyed your encounter with Mr Big Beard in Somalia.
SR: Yes, buying a Somali diplomatic passport from Mr Big Beard in a
Mogadishu back street market was a fairly weird experience.
BBC Four: Mogadishu did seem genuinely hairy.
SR: It is a very, very dangerous place. It seems to have been virtually
abandoned by the rest of the world precisely because it is so dangerous.
That just condemns the people who live there to almost perpetual suffering.
It actually made me think of Afghanistan in terms of how the rest of the
world was involved there at one point. There was foreign involvement in both
Afghanistan and Somalia in the 1980s and then in the early 90s the
international community pulled out of both countries. It was still pretty
bad when the rest of the world was in Somalia, but then they pulled out and
the inhabitants have been left to suffer on their own ever since. I think
there is the potential for similar problems to those in Afghanistan if the
rest of the world doesn’t get involved properly in Somalia.
BBC Four: There also seemed to have been a lot of instances when the camera
had to be pointed at the ground to avoid your filming being noticed.
SR: There were a few times when filming became dangerous. The countries we
were in are inherently lawless by their very nature. They exist in a vacuum
of their own. There is no British embassy you can turn to. You take
somewhere like Trans-Dniester, which is quite clearly functioning as a
country, but the international community does not operate there and there’s
no one to turn to if you get into trouble. So you are entirely dependent and
at the mercy of the local government and the local security people or secret
police. You do have to be responsible and careful. If someone points a gun
at you, you point your camera the other way, and if they tell you to stop
filming, then you have to make a judgement on whether you are going to get
into a lot of trouble if you do carry on.
BBC Four: I realise that they are all very different, but where do you think
these countries are going?
SR: All of these countries have sought independence after a war or major
conflict and the threat of a future war hangs over them. Taiwan is the most
serious for the rest of the world, because if Taiwan and China go to war, it
will drag in other countries in the region, and possibly even the United
States. I think Somaliland is a likely candidate for international
recognition. The government and the people there have done so much to build
a functioning country that it does make you wonder how the rest of the world
can ignore them. It’s a real African success story.

Prove Hitler wrong

Prove Hitler wrong
Remember Ottoman Turkey’s slaughter of Armenian Christians:
Saturday October 23rd, 2004
World Magazine

By Marvin Olasky

Editor’s warning: This article contains graphic material.

VAN, Turkey — As Turkey moves toward eventual membership in the
European Union (see Madisonian Turkey from this week’s issue), this
Muslim nation should also come to grips with a terrible crime that has
gone largely unpunished.
Armenians, many of them Christian, lived in this area of what is now
eastern Turkey for about 2,000 years. Despite suffering massacres in
1894 and 1895 at the hands of the Ottoman Turks, they still numbered
well over 1 million in 1914. Ten years later only scattered handfuls
were left.
Adolf Hitler used what is now called the Armenian holocaust as his
model for an even greater holocaust. Ottoman Turks developed
techniques later used by the Nazis, such as piling 90 people into a
train car with a capacity of 36, and leaving them locked in for days,
terrified, starving, and often dead.
Hitler was even more impressed with how the Turks got away with
genocide. When Hitler on Aug. 22, 1939, explained that his plans to
invade Poland included the formation of death squads that would
exterminate men, women, and children, he asked, “Who, after all,
speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?”
In recent years some have. Books such as Peter Balakian’s The Burning
Tigris (HarperCollins, 2003) tell of the Armenian tragedy in a way
that also helps us to understand radical Islam. That’s because the key
incitement to massacre came on Nov. 14, 1914, when Mustafa Hayri Bey,
the Ottoman Empire’s leading Sunni authority, urged his followers to
commence a jihad: One pamphlet declared, “He who kills even one
unbeliever . . . shall be rewarded by Allah.”
The jihad proclamation received wide dissemination. When a priest
asked a Muslim army officer how he could participate in killing
several thousand Armenian women, Captain Shukri’s answer was simple:
It was jihad time, and after the murders he could “spread out my
prayer rug and pray, giving glory to Allah and the Prophet who made me
worthy of personally participating in the holy jihad in these days of
my old age.”
The Ottoman Turk government set up and paid special killing
squads. The Ministry of the Interior gave instructions to “exterminate
all males under 50, priests and teachers, leave girls and children to
be Islamized.” Historians and journalists have estimated that Turks
killed 800,000 to 1 million Armenians in 1915 alone, and an additional
200,000 to 500,000 over the next seven years.
Here in Van 89 years ago, provincial governor Jevdet Bey gained the
nickname “the horseshoe master” because he nailed horseshoes to the
feet of Armenians. Henry Morgenthau, the American ambassador to
Turkey, described in 1918 testimony of torture he had heard: “The
gendarmes would nail hands and feet to pieces of wood–evidently in
imitation of the Crucifixion, and then while the sufferer writhes in
his agony, they would cry, ‘Now let your Christ come help you.'”
Aurora Mardiganian, the only member of her family to survive, told of
killing squads that planted their swords in the ground, blade up, at
intervals of several yards. Killers on horseback each grabbed a girl,
rode their horses at a controlled gallop, and tried to throw the girl
so she would be impaled on a sword: “If the killer missed and the girl
was only injured, she would be scooped up again until she was impaled
on the protruding blade.”
The silent film Ravished Armenia, based on Aurora Mardiganian’s
account, caused a U.S. sensation–but British officials demanded
before showtime in London the deletion of a scene of Armenian women
being crucified. Miss Mardiganian agreed that the scene, which showed
the women being crucified on large crosses with their long hair
covering their nude bodies, was inauthentic.
The scene was inaccurate, she said, because the crosses in the film
were large, but in reality they were little and pointed: “They took
the clothes off the girls. They made them bend down. And after raping
them, they made them sit on the pointed wood, through . . .”
Americans, she said, “can’t show such terrible things” (and I can’t
write about them in full detail).
After the World War ended in 1918 several Turks, including “the
horseshoe master,” were executed for war crimes. Hundreds of
perpetrators went free, and to this day Turkish textbooks cover up the
slaughter of Armenians, as they also cover up the slaughter of Greek
Christians in western Turkey during that same era.
Prove Hitler wrong.
Governments are to wield the sword to bring justice, so remember
Armenian and other victims of governments that killed their own
people, and thank God that the United States has worked to protect
innocent people in Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Sudan.
Copyright © 2005 Armenian National Committe of Australia

Alcatel launches its 3GRC in Moscow

Alcatel launches its 3GRC in Moscow
3GNewsroom.com
January 30, 2005
Alcatel announced the inauguration of its latest born 3G Reality
Centre (3GRC) in Moscow, Russia. The Moscow’s 3G Reality Centre,
powered by Alcatel’s industry-leading Evolium global mobile solution,
is using a fully open multi-standard infrastructure compatible with
all technologies. It will nurture local apprenticeship and research
for innovative 2.5G and 3G end-to-end mobile multimedia solutions in
Russia and other CIS countries.
This unique facility is part of the Alcatel’s worldwide 3GRC program
which offers to operators, content and service providers as well as
terminals manufacturers a live business environment for service
innovation, dedicated to the development, validation, testing and
demonstration of exciting next generation mobile applications and
services.
The Moscow’s 3GRC will present a large variety of broadband
user-centric audio, video, and messaging services:
— A broad range of mobile video solutions, spread over two segments:
video content delivery (video streaming, video downloading), and video
communication (video messaging, video telephony, video conferencing,
video mailbox).
— Personalized Ring Back Tone (PRBT) is a new music service available
for Russia and other CIS countries. Personalized Ring Back Tone
subscriber will be able to personalize the usual mechanical ring back
tone heard until the call is connected, by selected music tracks,
sound effects or personal messages.
— Furthermore, forecasting the future of multimedia mobile services
in Russia and other CIS countries, Moscow’s 3GRC will also be able to
showcase services such as video calls, video streaming, high-speed
Internet access and videoconference that require higher transmission
speeds.
“The growth in mobile communication market in the coming years will
depend on the development of multimedia services that can bring value
to all the relevant players in the new value chain,” stated Johan
Vanderplaetse, vice-president of Alcatel in the CIS countries. “The 3G
Reality Centre in Moscow will open new opportunities for introduction
of mobile multimedia services in the fast developing Russian and CIS
mobile market. The opening of this centre paves the way for the
development of 3G mobile services in Russia and is totally in line
with Alcatel’s world-wide user-centric broadband vision.”
* The Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) includes: Armenia,
Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Republic of Moldova,
Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan.

ASBAREZ Online [01-31-2005]

ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
01/31/2005
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP:// 1) OSCE Mission Inspects Occupied Azeri Lands 2) European Armenians Denounce Removal of Armenian Genocide from German Schools 3) Wales Community Commemorates 90th Anniversary of Genocide 4) Armenian Dram Again Rising against Dollar 1) OSCE Mission Inspects Occupied Azeri Lands STEPANAKERT (Combined Sources)--Officials from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) began on Monday, a first-ever international inspection of Armenian-controlled Azeri territories around Karabagh, aimed at investigating Baku's allegations that they are being illegally populated with Armenians. The fact-finding team, led by a senior German Foreign Ministry official Emily Habber, and accompanied by the French, Russian, and US co-chairs of the OSCE's Minsk Group visited the Kelbajar district west of Karabagh before arriving in Stepanakert later in the day. They met there with Mountainous Karabagh Republic President Arkady Ghukasian. "We have heard many interesting details and I am confident that those details will help us assess the situation correctly," Habber told local journalists afterward. Stating that their mission is technical and not political, she said the OSCE mission will spend ten days traveling around the occupied lands and submit a report to the Minsk Group later on. The fact-finding mission was sent to the region as a result of a compromise agreement between the conflicting parties and the mediators that prevented a vote in the UN General Assembly on an Azeri draft resolution that condemned the decade-long occupation of the seven Azeri districts seen by the Armenians as a vital buffer zone guaranteeing Karabagh's security. The resolution was endorsed by many Islamic nations but the United States, Russia, and France warned that it would hamper their peace efforts. Meeting with the OSCE officials, Ghukasian reaffirmed that his government is not encouraging the resettlement of Armenian families in those areas and said those Armenians who have moved there since the 1994 ceasefire are mostly former refugees from Azerbaijan. Ghukasian also urged the visitors to inspect Azeri-controlled areas of Karabagh that were formerly populated with Armenians. He expressed hope that the mission's report would contribute to forming a constructive environment for a peaceful settlement of the conflict, as well as conclusively dismiss the false claims of Azerbaijan. The OSCE delegation held talks with Azeri officials in Baku before traveling to Karabagh via Armenia. 2) European Armenians Denounce Removal of Armenian Genocide from German Schools BRUSSELS(Combined Sources)--Reacting to the eastern German state of Brandenburg's removal of a reference to the Armenian genocide from a German school curriculum, the European Armenian Federation denounced the unacceptable attitude of the state, expressing that the decision of the local German authorities is symptomatic of a lack of courage by a certain segment of European leaders in dealing with this critical issue. Following extensive pressure from Turkish authorities, the German state of Brandenburg eliminated half a sentence on the Armenians included in ninth and tenth grade history classes after a Turkish diplomat complained to state Prime Minister Matthias Platzeck, the newspaper Die Welt reported. Prime Minister Platzeck is a member of Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder's Social Democrats (SPD). Schroeder is a strong supporter of Turkey's bid to become a member of the European Union. The Federation explained that this position only encourages Turkey to export its denialist propaganda to Europe. It continued to deplore the deep consequences of the complicity between and European leaders and Turkey's historical revisionists on the European project. "How can we believe the goodwill statements made by German leaders when they allow genocide denial to be instilled in the minds of the German children?" asked Hilda Tchoboian, chairwoman of the European Armenian Federation. "The 90th anniversary of the Genocide must mark the end of European complicity, as shown by its silence during the extermination of the Armenians. We call upon all German political leaders to turn this regrettable initiative into an act of justice best representing this great nation," said Tchoboian. Brandenburg was the first German state in 2002 to include the Armenian genocide in its teaching guidelines. In October 2004, however, the Ministry of Education reversed a decision calling on Bochum's Institute for Genocides and Diasporas to prepare a book on the Armenian Genocide. The book would have been the first of a series of three on genocide related issues and collective violence in the twentieth century. The order was cancelled by incoming Minister of Education Holger Rupprecht (SPD), at the request of Prime Minister Platzeck, who had succumbed to Turkish lobbying efforts. Bochum University's Director of the Institute for Genocides and Diasporas, Prof. Mihran Dabag, denounced the decision, stating, "The Armenian genocide is inseparable from European remembrance. It is the first genocidal achievement of our common history." He continued to argue that, "At the very time when the world commemorates the victims of the Nazi camps, our country must, if we are sincere in our fight against negationism, and give a firm answer to Turkey's denial. The Brandenburg government must reconsider its decision and carry out its genocides teaching project." The Potsdam government's announcement provoked a chorus of protests in German television news shows and dozens of print articles, available on the European Armenian Federation's website-- Policy-makers from throughout the political spectrum denounced the unacceptable position of the state. The Christian Democratic Union (CDU), which serves as junior coalition partner in Brandenburg's government, is infuriated over the change to the state's schoolbooks. "The impression created is fatal," said Sven Patke, the state CDU secretary general. The head of the Central Committee of Armenians in Germany, Schavarsh Ovassapian, told Die Welt the move was "a scandal." "It is depressing, if what's in schoolbooks in Brandenburg can be dictated from Ankara," he said. 3) Wales Community Commemorates 90th Anniversary of Genocide LONDON (Combined Sources)--On Wednesday, January 26, the 90th anniversary of the Armenian genocide was marked at a commemoration held at the "Temple of Peace and Health" in Cardiff, Wales. Organized by the Welsh Center for International Affairs (WCIA), the event also commemorated the Holocaust perpetrated by the Nazi regime, and was attended by a number of government representatives, including the First Minister of the National Assembly of Wales, Rhodri Morgan. The commemoration drew the attention of the British government, which listed it on the website government sponsored site dedicated to the National Holocaust Memorial Day. During the commemoration, Jenny Randerson, a senior figure of the Welsh Liberal Democrats and a former minister in the Assembly, spoke about the Republic of Turkey's denial of the 1915 genocide and its policy of exerting pressure on all those who affirm the genocide. Randerson has been harassed by the Turkish government since 2001, when she made her first public statements about genocide. Established in 1973, the WCIA is organization dedicated to promoting world peace, securing human rights, and educating the public about atrocities of the past. 4) Armenian Dram Again Rising Against Dollar YEREVAN (RFE/RL)--The US dollar fell against Armenia's national currency, the dram, despite the dollar's rally in world financial markets this month. The dram gained 5 percent in value against the dollar over the past 10 days, approaching its three-year high registered in the middle of December. It was trading at an average of 473 against $1 on Monday, with a 20 percent increase in value from a year ago. The trend is surprising given the almost 5 percent increase in the dollar's value against the euro since the beginning of this month. Some economists speculate that the Central Bank is artificially bolstering the dram in an effort to benefit importers of key commodities. The Central Bank argues, however, that the stronger dram is the result of increased cash remittances from Armenians working abroad. An estimated amount of at least $760 million was sent to Armenia last month through banks and wire transfer networks. The bank's chairman Tigran Sarkisian insisted that the strong dram is a positive for the Armenian economy because of resulting low levels of inflation. "The dram's strengthening has had a major restraining impact on the prices of imported goods," he said in late December. All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and subscription requests. (c) 2005 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved. ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through mass media outlets.

WWW.ASBAREZ.COM
www.eafjd.org.
www.holocaustmemorailday.gov.uk–a

Brandenburg Endorses Turkey’s Policy of Genocide Denial

EUROPEAN ARMENIAN FEDERATION
For Justice and Democracy
Avenue de la Renaissance 10
B – 1000 BRUXELLES
Tel: +32 (0) 2 732 70 26
Tel./Fax: +32 (0) 2 732 70 27
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:
PRESS RELEASE
January 30th, 2004
Contact: Talline Tachdjian
Tel.: +32 (0)2 732 70 27
BRANDENBURG ENDORSES TURKEY’S POLICY OF GENOCIDE DENIAL
Brussels, Belgium – Following extensive pressure from Turkish authorities,
the German state of Brandenburg removed references of the Armenian Genocide
from its state education curriculum.
Brandenburg was the first German state to include the Armenian Genocide
within its teaching guidelines in 2002. However, in October 2004, the
Ministry of Education reversed a decision calling on Bochum’s Institute for
Genocides and Diasporas to prepare a book on the Armenian Genocide. The book
would have been the first of a series of three on genocide related issues
and collective violence in the twentieth century. The order was cancelled by
incoming Minister of Education Mr. Holger Rupprecht (SPD), at the request of
Brandenburg Prime Minister Mr. Matthias Platzeck, who had succumbed to
Turkish lobbying efforts.
Bochum University’s Director of the Institute for Genocides and Diasporas,
Prof. Mihran Dabag, denounced the decision, stating “The Armenian genocide
is inseparable from European remembrance. It is the first genocidal
achievement of our common history.” He went on to argue that “At the very
time when the world commemorates the victims of the Nazi camps, our country
must, if we are sincere in our fight against negationism, give a firm answer
to Turkey’s denial; The Brandenburg government must reconsider its decision
and carry out its genocides teaching project.”
The Potsdam government’s announcement provoked a chorus of protests in
German public opinion. In television news shows and dozens of print
articles, available on the European Armenian Federation website –
, policy-makers from throughout the political spectrum
denounced the unacceptable attitude of the state.
The European Armenian Federation considers the decision of the local German
authorities symptomatic of a lack of courage by a certain segment of
European leaders in dealing with this critical issue. This position only
encourages Turkey to export its denialist propaganda to Europe, explained
the Federation. It went on to deplore the deep consequences of the
complicity between and European leaders and Turkey’s historical revisionists
on the European project.
“How can we believe the goodwill statements made by German leaders when they
allow genocide denial to be instilled in the minds of the German children?”
asked Hilda Tchoboian, chairwoman of the European Armenian Federation. “The
90th anniversary of the Genocide must mark the end of European complicity,
as shown by its silence during the extermination of the Armenians. We call
upon all German political leaders to turn this regrettable initiative into
an act of justice best representing this great nation,” said Mrs. Tchoboian.
FEDERATION EURO-ARMENIENNE
Pour la Justice et la Démocratie
Avenue de la Renaissance 10
B – 1000 BRUXELLES
Tel: +32 (0) 2 732 70 26
Tel./Fax : +32 (0) 2 732 70 27
E-mail : [email protected]
Web :
COMMUNIQUE DE PRESSE
28 janvier 2005
Contact: Talline Tachdjian
Tel.: +32 (0)2 732 70 27
LE BRANDEBOURG AVALISE LA POLITIQUE NEGATIONNISTE DE LA TURQUIE CONCERNANT
LE GENOCIDE DES ARMENIENS
Bruxelles, Belgique – Suite aux pressions de la Turquie, le gouvernement de
l’Etat de Potsdam a ordonné la suppression de la mention du génocide des
Arméniens des directives pédagogiques de son Ministère de l’Education,
préparées à l’intention des enseignants de ce land allemand.
C’est en 2002 que le land de Brandebourg avait inclus l’enseignement du
génocide des Arméniens dans le cursus scolaire. Cependant, dès le mois
d’octobre 2004, le Ministère de l’Education avait décommandé un livre sur le
génocide des Arméniens que l’Institut des Génocides et des Diasporas de
Bochum avait préparé à la demande du même Ministère. Ce livre devait être le
premier d’une série de trois traitant de la question des génocides et de la
violence collective au XXème siècle. La commande avait été dénoncée après le
remplacement de l’ancien Ministre de l’Education par M. Holger Rupprecht
(SPD), obéissant ainsi aux injonctions du Premier Ministre de Brandebourg,
M. Matthias Platzeck à la suite des pressions de la diplomatie turque.
« Le génocide des Arméniens est inséparable de la mémoire de l’Europe ; il
est la première réalisation génocidaire de notre histoire commune » a
déclaré Mihran Dabag, le directeur de l’Institut des génocides et des
Diasporas de l’Université de Bochum.
« En ces jours de commémoration des victimes des camps nazis, si nous
sommes sincères dans la lutte déclarée contre le négationnisme, notre pays
doit donner une réponse ferme au négationnisme de la Turquie ; le
gouvernement de Brandebourg doit revenir sur cette décision et réaliser le
projet d’enseignement des génocides » a conclu le professeur Dabag.
La décision du gouvernement de Potsdam a provoqué un tollé général dans
l’opinion publique allemande ; des dizaines d’articles (disponible sur le
site Internet ) et d’émissions télévisées, des figures
politiques de tous bords ont dénoncé l’attitude inadmissible des autorités
du land.
La Fédération Euro-Arménienne considère cette décision des autorités locales
allemandes comme symptomatique du manque de courage d’une certaine classe
politique européenne : elle considère que cette attitude encourage la
Turquie à importer son négationnisme en Europe. Elle déplore les lourdes
conséquences que la participation de la classe politique au mensonge de
l’Etat turc aura sur la construction européenne.
« Comment croire aux déclarations de bonne volonté des dirigeants allemands
à Auschwitz lorsque ces mêmes dirigeants permettent d’instiller le
négationnisme dans les esprits des enfants allemands ? » s’est interrogée
Hilda Tchoboian, Présidente de la Fédération.
« Le 90ème anniversaire du génocide doit marquer la fin de la complicité par
le silence dont l’Europe a fait preuve pendant l’extermination des
Arméniens. Nous appelons l’ensemble des forces politiques allemandes à faire
de cet événement condamnable l’occasion d’un acte de justice digne d’un
grand pays » a déclaré la Présidente de la Fédération Euro-Arménienne.

www.eafjd.org
www.eafjd.org

Contradictory Statements by PACE Rapporteur Prevent Confidence

CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS BY PACE RAPPORTEUR ON NAGORNY KARABAKH
PREVENT CONFIDENCE BUILDING IN THE REGION
STEPANAKERT, JANUARY 28. ARMINFO. The statements by PACE rapporteur on
Nagorny Karabakh David Atkinson are contradictory and are not
contributive to the regional confidence building and Karabakh conflict
settlement, says NKR presidential executive David Babayan commenting
on Atkinson’s interview to BBC.
Babayan says that Atkinson’s statements contradict both one another
and PACE’s position on ethnic conflict settlement. Particularly
Atkinson says that the principle of a nation’s right to
self-determination cannot be applied in the Karabakh peace process and
this issue should be settled in the framework of Azerbaijan’s
territorial integrity. At the same time he hopes that the Azeri
authorities will start contacting with Nagorny Karabakh
representatives. It is not clear what they can discuss if the
settlement formula is already predetermined and is unacceptable for
all the conflicting parties.
Babayan sees no logic in assuming that Karabakh may have independence
in case of Azerbaijan’s consent and stating right away that Azerbaijan
will never give such a consent. Doesn’t this mean that PACE has no
clear position on the issue? Why is PACE based on Azerbaijan’s rather
than Nagorny Karabakh’s position? Doesn’t this mean that PACE is
partial? Babayan hopes that this is Atkinson’s personal opinion rather
than the stance of the whole European community whose policy is based
on the human values of equality and democracy.

Unique Ed Partnership Between AGBU and Lawrence Tech University

PRESS RELEASE
A.G.B.U. Alex & Marie Manoogian School
Lawrence Technological University
Contact: John Miskelly or Carolyn Assarian
Phone: (313) 982-1400
Unique Educational Partnership Begins Between A.G.B.U. Alex & Marie
Manoogian School and Lawrence Technological University
1/25/05
SOUTHFIELD, MI – At the A.G.B.U. Alex & Marie Manoogian School in
Southfield, an exciting partnership was officially formed as
administrators from the Manoogian School and Lawrence Technological
University participated in a signing ceremony (photo 1 attached). Titled
INSPIRE (Inspiring and Nurturing Students – A Partnership for Innovative
and Rewarding Education), the new program outlined in the signed
agreement offers Manoogian School seniors the opportunity to take
courses at Lawrence Tech for college credit.
In his remarks at the ceremony, Dr. Charles Chambers, president of
Lawrence Technological University, recalled a previous discussion with
Manoogian School founder Alex Manoogian. Dr. Chambers said, `(Manoogian)
believed in educational opportunities for young people,’ and he believes
the INSPIRE program follows the same lines Manoogian had intended for
the school. Dr. Chambers encouraged Manoogian students to apply for the
program in the future.
Dr. Nadya Sarafian, principal of Manoogian School, urged students to
take advantage of the chance to take courses at such an esteemed
university.
The ceremony also included the introduction of Manoogian’s three INSPIRE
students, who have already begun classes at Lawrence Tech: Vatche
Bassmagian, Avak Kahramanian and Mihai Untea. They were presented with
certificates and Lawrence Tech sweatshirts by Dr. Chambers.
In addition to Drs. Chambers and Sarafian, signing the agreement were
Dr. Lewis Walker, executive vice-president and provost, Lawrence
Technological University, Hosep Torossian, vice-principal, and Dr.
Richard Marburger, chair of the board of education, Manoogian School.
Also in attendance were several Lawrence Tech faculty members and staff;
Manoogian School board members, PTO members, parents, friends, faculty
and staff; and representatives from the Mayor of Southfield’s office and
Central Michigan University’s Charter Schools Office.
The Manoogian School is located in Southfield, Michigan. Established in
1969, the school was chartered by Central Michigan University in 1995.
Its curriculum follows the Michigan State Board of Education guidelines
for all schools, in addition to emphasizing the study of the Armenian
language, culture, history and arts.
Lawrence Technological University, also located in Southfield, is a
private university with a reputation for excellence. It boasts a
well-respected faculty in the fields of engineering, architecture and
design, arts and sciences, and management.
(1) Signing Ceremony Photo: Administrators from Manoogian School and
Lawrence Tech University sign the agreement outlining the new IGNITE
partnership, which allows Manoogian students to take college courses at
Lawrence Tech for college credit.
(2) INSPIRE Students Photo: Pictured with Dr. Nadya Sarafian, principal
of Manoogian School, and Dr. Charles Chambers, president of Lawrence
Tech University, are the three Manoogian students taking part in the
INSPIRE program: Vatche Bassmagian, Mihai Untea, and Avak Kahramanian.
Contact: John Miskelly or Carolyn Assarian
Phone: (313) 982-1400

BAKU: Think-tank predicts boost in Azeri-Iranian economic relations

Think-tank predicts boost in Azeri-Iranian economic relations
Zerkalo, Baku
25 Jan 05

Excerpt from CGR analytical group report by Azerbaijani newspaper
Zerkalo on 25 January entitled “Next stage of dialogue between Baku
and Tehran”, subheaded “Cooperation between Azerbaijan and Iran plays
pivotal role in maintaining balance of forces in the region”
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev started his official visit to the
Islamic Republic of Iran yesterday [24 January]. This visit should be
considered primarily as the next stage in the dynamic development that
has been observed in recent months in the Azerbaijani-Iranian
dialogue.
As the authors of this article have written in one of their previous
reports, cooperation between Azerbaijan and Iran plays a leading role
in maintaining the balance of forces between the power centres of the
South Caucasus, and is consequently of great significance for the
security of Azerbaijan and the whole region.
We would like to concentrate on another important component of
bilateral cooperation between Azerbaijan and Iran – namely, the
possibilities for transit alternatives and transport security for
Azerbaijan.
Azerbaijan has repeatedly come under pressure from neighbouring states
on the issue of importing oil and its transport via our territory and
access to world markets.
Problems triggered by Russia in the exploitation of the northern
[Baku-Novorossiysk] oil pipeline were a real headache for Azerbaijan
before the commissioning of the Baku-Supsa oil pipeline. [Passage
omitted]
Nevertheless, we should also bear in mind that we are in a region
where the interests of various force centres clash. Our country’s very
position at the point of contact of the interests of power centres
restricts its movements and compels us to take heed of the interests
of the opposing side in the course of cooperation with neighbouring
states. First of all there is the US factor, which has had an
influence on Azerbaijan’s relations with Iran. However, if we pay heed
to the fact that the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline is nearing
completion, that Azerbaijan is successfully continuing integration
into the west and is a partner in the antiterror coalition, led by the
USA along with Russia and the European Union, and that a strengthening
of our southern neighbour is being observed, then it is easy to
imagine that a favourable situation for this highly important
cooperation with Iran in transport has been established.
Activities in this direction are being carried out in principle. As
Zerkalo newspaper reported, the sixth session of the
Azerbaijani-Iranian intergovernmental commission on cooperation in
economic, trade and humanitarian fields was held in Tehran on 8-9
January 2005. A memorandum, signed at the end of the session of the
commission, envisaged the development of a feasibility study of a
draft project for the construction of an Alat-Astara road. The
document also stipulated the drafting of projects for the construction
of a Qazvin-Rasht-Astara (Iran)-Astara (Azerbaijan) railway. If these
projects are successfully implemented, then the reconstruction of the
Alat-Astara road, the implementation of the Qazvin-Rasht-Astara
(Iran)-Astara (Azerbaijan) railway, and the establishment of a single
railway junction between Azerbaijan and Iran will be conducive to the
realization of the North-South transport corridor by boosting railway
transportation between Europe and South Asia. [Passage omitted]
However, all this does not mean that the important Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
project will be put back. On the contrary, it will remain the main
export channel for Azerbaijani oil, and the Iranian route will play a
supporting role in force majeure circumstances. Such a position will
take into consideration both geopolitical factors, in particular, the
level and essence of US-Iranian relations. Thus, a marked
rapprochement and a striving for the implementation of fully-fledged
cooperation by both the Iranian and Azerbaijani sides is of
significance not only for political and economic relations between the
two countries but also for the resolution of the Armenian-Azerbaijani
conflict, securing energy and transit security for Azerbaijan, and
finally, for a strategy of maintaining a balance of forces in the
South Caucasus.

FM OSkanian’s speech at the 28th special session

PERMANENT MISSION OF ARMENIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS
Contact: Dziunik AGHAJANIAN
Minister-Counsellor
Deputy Permanent Representative
119 East 36th Street, New York, NY 10016, USA
Tel: 1-212-686-9079
Fax: 1-212-686-3934
Mobile: 1-917-940-5665
STATEMENT
by H.E. Mr. Vartan Oskanian
Minister of Foreign Affairs of Armenia
to the 28th Special Session
of the UN General Assembly
Mr. President
Your Excellencies
Dear Friends,
On behalf of the people and government of Armenia, and as a descendant of
genocide survivors, I feel compelled to be here today, to join other
survivors and descendants, of both victims and perpetrators, to take part in
this commemoration. I am also duty-bound to urge us all to confront more
effectively the threat of genocide anywhere, at any time, regardless of cost
and political discomfort.
The liberation of Auschwitz is, indeed, cause for commemorative celebration.
However, in this commemoration, with each uttering of the name Auschwitz, we
are forced to reflect: to look back, look around, look deep, look at the
other, but also look inward, at ourselves.
After 9/11 and reacting to the unusually high number of victims of a
singular event, an editorialist proclaimed “We are all Americans”. Sympathy,
solidarity, anxiety, and indignation bound us together. How much more
intense our feelings about Auschwitz and the singularity of its horror, its
synonymity with the technology of death-making, its eerily ordinary
commitment to efficiency, to pragmatic, effective, result-oriented
administration.
After Auschwitz, we are all Jews, we are all Gypsies, we are all unfit,
deviant and undesirable, for someone, somewhere. After Auschwitz, the
conscience of man cannot remain the same. Man’s inhumanity to men, to women,
to children, and to the elderly, is no longer a concept in search of a name,
an image, a description. Auschwitz lends its malefic aura to all the
Auschwitzes of history, our collective history, both before and after.
In the 20th century alone, with its 15 genocides, the victims have their own
names for places of infamy. What the French call ‘les lieux infames de
memoire’ are everywhere. Places of horror, slaughter, of massacre, of the
indiscriminate killing of all those who have belonged to a segment, a
category, an ethnic group, a race or a religion. For Armenians, it is the
desert of Deir-El-Zor, for Cambodians they are the killing fields, for the
children of the 21st century, it is Darfur. For the Jews and Poles and for a
whole generation of us growing up after The War, it is Auschwitz.
Mr. President,
Just as we all were, or are, or might be victims, we all were or are or
might also be guilty. It is only through the engagement of those who have
seen and done the unimaginable, and who have had the dignity, the grace, the
sensitivity, the decency and courage to acknowledge wrongdoing, that we may
achieve the requisite collective political will and its expression.
This is not as naïve, unrealistic, idealistic as some might wish to label
it, perhaps in order to dismiss it. Genocide is not about individuals who
act insanely, do evil, commit crimes, perpetrate irrevocable wrongs.
Genocide is the undertaking of a state apparatus, which must, by definition,
act coherently, pragmatically, with structure and organization.
Thus, this is not a plea to reform human beings, but an appeal to take
conscious account of the role of our national institutions and international
institutions must play to insure that no one can expect to enjoy impunity.
After Auschwitz one would expect that no one any longer has a right to turn
a blind eye or a deaf ear. As an Armenian, I know that a blind eye, a deaf
ear and a muted tongue perpetuate the wounds. It is a memory of suffering
unrelieved by strong condemnation and unequivocal recognition. The catharsis
that the victims deserve, which societies require in order to heal and move
forward together, obligates us here at the UN, and in the international
community, to be witness, to call things by their name, to remove the veil
of obfuscation, of double standards, of political expediency.
Mr. Presidents,
Following the Tsunami-provoked disaster, we have become painfully aware of a
paradox. On the one hand, multilateral assistance efforts were massive,
swift, generous and without discrimination. But, when compared and
contrasted with today’s other major tragedy, in Africa, it is plain that for
Darfur, formal and ritual condemnation has not been followed by any
dissuasive action against the perpetrators.
The difference with the Tsunami, of course, was that there were no
perpetrators. No one wielded the sword, pulled the trigger or pushed the
button that released the gas.
Recognizing the victims and acknowledging them is also to recognize that
there are perpetrators. But this is absolutely not the same as actually
naming them, shaming them, dissuading or warning them, isolating or
punishing them.
If these observations signal a certain naiveté that overlooks the enduring
structures of our political and security interests, then, on this occasion,
when we have gathered to commemorate this horrible event, then allow me this
one question: if not here and now, then where and when?
Mr. President,
The Spanish-American philosopher George Santayana, who has been quoted here,
admonished us to remember the past, or be condemned to repeat it. This
admonition has significance for me personally, because the destruction of my
people, whose fate in some way impinged upon the fate of the Jews of Europe,
should have been viewed more widely seen as a warning of things to come.
Jews and Armenians are linked forever by Hitler. Who, after all, speaks
today of the annihilation of the Armenians? said Adolf Hitler, days before
he entered Poland.
Hitler’s cynical remembrance of Armenians is prominently displayed in the
Holocaust Memorial in Washington because it is profound commentary about the
crucial role of third parties in genocide prevention and remembrance.
Genocide is the manifestation of the break in the covenant that governments
have with their peoples. Therefore, it is third parties who become crucial
actors in genocide prevention, humanitarian assistance and genocide
remembrance.
We are commemorating today, because the Soviet troops marched into Auschwitz
60 years ago. I am here today because the Arabs provided sanctuary to
Armenian deportees 90 years ago.
Third parties, indeed, can make the difference between life and death. Their
rejection of the behaviors and policies which are neither in anyone’s
national interest nor in humanity’s international interest, is of immense
moral and political value.
What neighbors, well-wishers, the international community can’t accomplish,
is the transcending and reconciling which the parties must do for
themselves. The victims, first, must exhibit the dignity, capacity and
willingness to move on, and the perpetrators, first and last, must summon
the deep force of humanity and goodness and must overcome the memory of the
inner evil which had already prevailed, and must renounce the deed, its
intent, its consequences, its architects and executors.
Auschwitz signifies the worst of hate, of indifference, of dehumanization.
Remembrance of Auschwitz and its purpose, however abhorrent, is a vital step
to making real the phrase “Never Again”.
Thank you.